I love how in the comments people are mad that a chinese car got a better score than their favourite european cars. This car is very safe and you can’t deny that. edit: to the people who are saying the rollover from the side crash is really unsafe and shouldn’t deserve 96% 1. your just guy on the internet 2. doesn’t matter what happens to the car, as long as the people inside are good then it will get a good rating
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars суть в показе прохождения теста на максимум, т.е показать скорость на которой автомобиль останавливается гарантированно. а то сейчас вообще непонятно как сравнить машин. но у вас вообще никаких значений не видно. прилагайте каждое видео AEB с максимальной скоростью и указывайте её. спасибо!
Volvo once again proving to be the cornerstone of automotive safety, not even being bought by the Chinese managed to stray them away from their main principle.
@@Tom-tr4em it's not racism when actual vehicle tests from the past 20 years have shown that Chinese brand vehicles were straight up unsafe. partnership with Volvo also had this major concern. just because you hate what you heard, doesn't mean it's racist. get your head out of your ass.
@@derek400004 thats the past get out of your cave. China has been making impressive vehicles in the past 3 years and are set to dominate the ev market. What cars does your country make? Horse chariots?
@@Tom-tr4em lmao what are you even talking about dude? OP is saying he is glad that Volvo's partnership with Geely did not cause the vehicle safety to worsen, and that is exactly a partnership from 10+ years ago at the height when all data showed Chinese cars sucked. so what are you trying to say? are you saying people should be able to see into the future? are you saying these people from 10+ years ago were racist by responding to the data? you know, for a country with as long a history as China, you little pink reds certainly seem awfully touchy about your own history. Insecure much?
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars Great! Hope your partner Global NCAP tests the one we get here in India too. Unlike you they don't drop any hints about what models will be tested soon.
Acabo de tener un accidente con el lynk & co.. Coche trasero un coche que no prendo y se estampó a unos 80km.. El coche un Renault scenic quedo casi totalmente destrozado.. Menos mal no hubo heridos. Nosotros dentro dentro del vehículo estamos bien con algunos traumatismos dados por el movimiento del coche y el choque en cuestión. Pero en consecuencia el Lynk&co resistió muy bien y absorvio bastante bien el coche. Pudimos seguir con nuestra ruta dirección un garaje. El otro coche quedó como lentamente destroza lo la parte delantera. Constato que el Lynk&co absorbe muy bien el choque trasero y efectivamente freno automáticamente.
Lol and I survived crash that was frontal with another car, we both were going around 70kmh. Cars were destroyed. I bended steering wheel with a head even I was belted. Here 50 kmh crash looks scary but it isn't at all.
Euro NCAP does not perform small overlap tests for perhaps good reason. But the result is that car makers like this 'cheap out' by fitting curtain airbags that don't extend far enough forward. Just look at the puny little things. They don't fill in the gap between the front airbag and the corner of the dashboard. This bad news in a small overlap crash. You can bet that this car will get better curtain airbags if it goes through the IIHS tests in the US. So they'll get a safer version of the same car. It's just like Latin America getting less safe versions of cars Europeans drive. Is this the car maker's fault or NCAP's fault, or both? Where else has Link & Co saved money, apart from on somebody to choose a good name?
Euro NCAP looks at the safety performance of vehicles in a crash test, it is not part of our remit to consider specific elements of a car’s structure. The strength of the car structure is assured by other parts of the car rather than the roof (like the A, B and C pillars, door beams, sills, seam or spot welded door and window apertures and the floor structure) and the legislative type approval sets minimum standards for this (these type approval requirements define whether a car can be sold or not). In a roll-over, wearing seat belts is the best way of controlling occupant ejection, provided that roof pillars are doing the job.
Can you believe it? This car, which is claimed to be safe and of uniform global manufacturing standards, has taken a differentiated approach when it comes to actual production. The model sold in China was recently found to have been treated with a reduction in steel strength, which does not match the strength advertised earlier, and one guesses that this was done to reduce production costs, which is a serious fraud! And it cannot be ruled out that the vehicles used for testing are not of the same steel strength as the actual vehicles sold! NCAP should have taken anonymous purchases for secondary spot checks!
Maybe the result is 96% for the sensors, but visual for me is far from that. The center of gravity is to high, in both frontal and side impact the car jumped like it was empty box, even rolled... Again, I can see the structure of the car is good, even if the side pole was a little bit too deep into the drivers seat, that's why i wouldn't feel safe in it, not 96%.
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
This car shares a platform with the Volvo XC40 (they are from the same group, Geely). Now I understand everything 👍
I love how in the comments people are mad that a chinese car got a better score than their favourite european cars. This car is very safe and you can’t deny that.
edit: to the people who are saying the rollover from the side crash is really unsafe and shouldn’t deserve 96%
1. your just guy on the internet
2. doesn’t matter what happens to the car, as long as the people inside are good then it will get a good rating
Of course it’s gonna do well, it has a Volvo DNA
You mean copy
@@3.14name lynk & co is owned by geely, who owns volvo
@@3.14name This is not a copy, its the same platform and same owner. Geely, which owns parts of Mercedes too.
@@3.14name boo hoo you little 3rd worlder.
I like how the rims look like flowers lol
It would be helpful if you included the speed of the ABB tests, like you used to do and in both MPH and KPH
Hi, We do the AEB tests at every speed. It would become a very long and boring video ;) if we added all the captions.
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars суть в показе прохождения теста на максимум, т.е показать скорость на которой автомобиль останавливается гарантированно. а то сейчас вообще непонятно как сравнить машин. но у вас вообще никаких значений не видно. прилагайте каждое видео AEB с максимальной скоростью и указывайте её. спасибо!
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars i love you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am Indian but Indian people hate euro ncap and Latin ncap 😂😂
I can't believe this is a car made in China. At the same price, it is even safer than Japanese and Korean cars.
Your iPhone is also Made in China!!
@@vox_dei_365 my phone is huawei mate 60
Volvo once again proving to be the cornerstone of automotive safety, not even being bought by the Chinese managed to stray them away from their main principle.
The underlying racism in the comment…. Because they are chinese they cant make a safe vehicle?
@@Tom-tr4em it's not racism when actual vehicle tests from the past 20 years have shown that Chinese brand vehicles were straight up unsafe. partnership with Volvo also had this major concern.
just because you hate what you heard, doesn't mean it's racist. get your head out of your ass.
@@derek400004 thats the past get out of your cave. China has been making impressive vehicles in the past 3 years and are set to dominate the ev market. What cars does your country make? Horse chariots?
@@Tom-tr4em lmao what are you even talking about dude? OP is saying he is glad that Volvo's partnership with Geely did not cause the vehicle safety to worsen, and that is exactly a partnership from 10+ years ago at the height when all data showed Chinese cars sucked.
so what are you trying to say? are you saying people should be able to see into the future? are you saying these people from 10+ years ago were racist by responding to the data?
you know, for a country with as long a history as China, you little pink reds certainly seem awfully touchy about your own history. Insecure much?
@@derek400004 nah he is implying because they are chinese they cant make safe vehicles and thats just bruh
Brilliant. Thank you for doing these videos
Good work Lynk and Co
Your videos satisfy me everyday❤
We love you euro ncap!!
Euro NCAP test for the new Hyundai i20 when?
very soon :)
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars Great! Hope your partner Global NCAP tests the one we get here in India too. Unlike you they don't drop any hints about what models will be tested soon.
@@TicTechToe Once in a while we can drop a hint :)
Basically a xc40 underneath
Why don't you test the Kia Sedona 2021 car?
1:12 OMG Rollover
:v
do you test for potential hearing damage from the air bags?
Deaf is better than dead. 🤷
@@ThatDaltonGuyW true still they're ways around that
Acabo de tener un accidente con el lynk & co.. Coche trasero un coche que no prendo y se estampó a unos 80km.. El coche un Renault scenic quedo casi totalmente destrozado.. Menos mal no hubo heridos. Nosotros dentro dentro del vehículo estamos bien con algunos traumatismos dados por el movimiento del coche y el choque en cuestión. Pero en consecuencia el Lynk&co resistió muy bien y absorvio bastante bien el coche. Pudimos seguir con nuestra ruta dirección un garaje. El otro coche quedó como lentamente destroza lo la parte delantera. Constato que el Lynk&co absorbe muy bien el choque trasero y efectivamente freno automáticamente.
I am from Vietnam.And you? Where are you from?
Lol and I survived crash that was frontal with another car, we both were going around 70kmh. Cars were destroyed. I bended steering wheel with a head even I was belted. Here 50 kmh crash looks scary but it isn't at all.
96% really?
1:12 Is it safe?
I don't agree the score.
Why? The rollover? What is the problem with that ?
I wondered that because a Jeep was penalised for it in the IIHS tests and Jeep said they were looking at a solution.
@@androo4519 IIHS is way stricter and have way more power over automakers than the NCAP, unfortunately.
Excellent
When There Will Be Tested The 2021 Fabia? Its Allready On Sales!
Y’all they dropped a shipping container on it and it did well
so no more 64km/h 40% overlap test?
They replaced it.
@@artym5560 thank you captain obvious but why?
Euro NCAP does not perform small overlap tests for perhaps good reason. But the result is that car makers like this 'cheap out' by fitting curtain airbags that don't extend far enough forward. Just look at the puny little things. They don't fill in the gap between the front airbag and the corner of the dashboard. This bad news in a small overlap crash. You can bet that this car will get better curtain airbags if it goes through the IIHS tests in the US. So they'll get a safer version of the same car. It's just like Latin America getting less safe versions of cars Europeans drive. Is this the car maker's fault or NCAP's fault, or both? Where else has Link & Co saved money, apart from on somebody to choose a good name?
Euro NCAP looks at the safety performance of vehicles in a crash test, it is not part of our remit to consider specific elements of a car’s structure.
The strength of the car structure is assured by other parts of the car rather than the roof (like the A, B and C pillars, door beams, sills, seam or spot welded door and window apertures and the floor structure) and the legislative type approval sets minimum standards for this (these type approval requirements define whether a car can be sold or not).
In a roll-over, wearing seat belts is the best way of controlling occupant ejection, provided that roof pillars are doing the job.
Dovete rimettere la prova a 64kmh
Машина должна сминаться, чтобы гасить кинетическую энергию. В танке влети в бетонные плиты, танк будет целым а внутри фарш
This is what happens when the Chinese buy Volvo otherwise they would be at the bottom of the list
wut? 96 percent? sounds a lil sus
1:12 roll over
volvo
I'm sorry but you cannot give this thing 96% if it rolls over from a side crash test
Can you believe it? This car, which is claimed to be safe and of uniform global manufacturing standards, has taken a differentiated approach when it comes to actual production. The model sold in China was recently found to have been treated with a reduction in steel strength, which does not match the strength advertised earlier, and one guesses that this was done to reduce production costs, which is a serious fraud! And it cannot be ruled out that the vehicles used for testing are not of the same steel strength as the actual vehicles sold! NCAP should have taken anonymous purchases for secondary spot checks!
Do you have any source for that información?
Are you joking?? Adult Occupant 96% ??? See 1:17 👎
but thats a good result
Maybe the result is 96% for the sensors, but visual for me is far from that. The center of gravity is to high, in both frontal and side impact the car jumped like it was empty box, even rolled... Again, I can see the structure of the car is good, even if the side pole was a little bit too deep into the drivers seat, that's why i wouldn't feel safe in it, not 96%.
Only a Tank can be 100% 96% is perfect for a stupid little car XD
@@BogdanDuceac have a read of the full report on the website. The video doesn’t do it justice for why it got this score.
what’s wrong with 1:17 ? stop acting like these people from NCAP are stupid like you. They’ve went to college for years
3:00 What an a-hole 😆