Oh man. All three are great options. Idk about over a Beretta cuz I love me a 92. CZ are incredibly flat shooting too. IMHO the 92 still has a slight edge over the other two but I’m biased.
Your videos are very informative: I found your 92/FN/PO7/LT cool shooting video! There are so few videos on TH-cam comparing similar pistols back to back. Thanks for doing that! Your Beretta 92 is LT version and likely shoots very different from the regular 92. I own a regular 92x and 92 performance version, the performance version shoots totally different. If we exclude LT 92, which is honestly speaking is a different gun from regular 92x, then you were shooting FN more accurate and much faster the other pistols. You missed few times from FN only because you tried to do something impossible, like increasing your shooting and rotating speed simultaneously. Off course, eventually anybody will miss! The sights are black on black not fiber optic, which kinda sucks, but I am pretty sure that after you install fiber optic front and customize grips for yourself CZs will be no match to FN. I like CZs and 92s but objectively it seems like FN is more accurate gun. All of your guns are great (much better than glocks) but one is just better than the other.
@@6793student Thank you! Yeah the LT92 is a bit smoother than the traditional 92s. I’ve owned multiple 92/A3/A4/96 (.40 S&W) through out my years and still love the 92 models. Really enjoy the CZ 75 lineups. For sure the new (revamped) FN High Power is fucking tits though, very accurate!
Moreover you are very familiar with 92 and 75 platforms! Based on your videos and FN price tag I think FN is a really great buy. The accuracy is very close if not better than any good production 1911, but the capacity is much higher. It looks relatively slim, the weight of 40 ounces, well the good carry belt and holster definitely help. Heavier weight with precision at the high speed vs lightweight and mediocre accuracy. I would vote for speed and accuracy. The reliability seems very solid. Staccato does not count IMHO. it is $2500-3000 gun and I would not recommend to a regular working man go and spend 3000 on a gun… it is only for real fans of shooting who practice regularly. FN is 1100-1200 nowadays, it is still not cheap but it seems very enjoyable to shoot. For its price it seems optimal and it seems recommendable even to a guy who wants just one gun for fun at the range and self defence. I really want to buy one, the problem is I have too many guns… anyway, your selection makes sense 100%, to me i’s just seems that FN very well rounded quality vs price. Great video, great collection!
Mine quit locking to the rear after 20 rounds and the back plate that holds the firing pin flew out at the range. Sent it in to FN a week before thanksgiving and it’s still there. They said that the magazine followers have a design flaw. I called to check on mine last week and they told me that they were waiting on a third party to make the new followers….
Winchester white box is the worst american made ammo out there. Inconsistent, dirty, smoky, under powered, just junk. That is probably why you are having problems with your pistols.
They both shoot like a dream. The DA/SA trigger on the 75 is fantastic, but also the same with the SA pull of the FN. The FN, but only by a small margin? The reset, IMHO, on the FN is really short, I like that. The action on the 75 is just a tad bit smoother….
Nice shooting! Love the new FN Hi Power
Thank you!
great review
Thanks you!
Would you recommend FN over CZ and Beretta as a range gun? Thanks for the video!
Oh man. All three are great options. Idk about over a Beretta cuz I love me a 92. CZ are incredibly flat shooting too. IMHO the 92 still has a slight edge over the other two but I’m biased.
Your videos are very informative: I found your 92/FN/PO7/LT cool shooting video! There are so few videos on TH-cam comparing similar pistols back to back. Thanks for doing that! Your Beretta 92 is LT version and likely shoots very different from the regular 92. I own a regular 92x and 92 performance version, the performance version shoots totally different. If we exclude LT 92, which is honestly speaking is a different gun from regular 92x, then you were shooting FN more accurate and much faster the other pistols. You missed few times from FN only because you tried to do something impossible, like increasing your shooting and rotating speed simultaneously. Off course, eventually anybody will miss! The sights are black on black not fiber optic, which kinda sucks, but I am pretty sure that after you install fiber optic front and customize grips for yourself CZs will be no match to FN. I like CZs and 92s but objectively it seems like FN is more accurate gun. All of your guns are great (much better than glocks) but one is just better than the other.
@@6793student Thank you! Yeah the LT92 is a bit smoother than the traditional 92s. I’ve owned multiple 92/A3/A4/96 (.40 S&W) through out my years and still love the 92 models. Really enjoy the CZ 75 lineups. For sure the new (revamped) FN High Power is fucking tits though, very accurate!
Moreover you are very familiar with 92 and 75 platforms! Based on your videos and FN price tag I think FN is a really great buy. The accuracy is very close if not better than any good production 1911, but the capacity is much higher. It looks relatively slim, the weight of 40 ounces, well the good carry belt and holster definitely help. Heavier weight with precision at the high speed vs lightweight and mediocre accuracy. I would vote for speed and accuracy. The reliability seems very solid. Staccato does not count IMHO. it is $2500-3000 gun and I would not recommend to a regular working man go and spend 3000 on a gun… it is only for real fans of shooting who practice regularly. FN is 1100-1200 nowadays, it is still not cheap but it seems very enjoyable to shoot. For its price it seems optimal and it seems recommendable even to a guy who wants just one gun for fun at the range and self defence. I really want to buy one, the problem is I have too many guns… anyway, your selection makes sense 100%, to me i’s just seems that FN very well rounded quality vs price. Great video, great collection!
CZ75 for me!
Mine quit locking to the rear after 20 rounds and the back plate that holds the firing pin flew out at the range. Sent it in to FN a week before thanksgiving and it’s still there. They said that the magazine followers have a design flaw. I called to check on mine last week and they told me that they were waiting on a third party to make the new followers….
Damn l, that sucks bro. When I had to send my 509 back they took forever too, but they were also working with Winchester to resolve the issue.
Winchester white box is the worst american made ammo out there. Inconsistent, dirty, smoky, under powered, just junk. That is probably why you are having problems with your pistols.
Totally agree. I always have issues. I ended up buying a bunch around the pandemic because that’s what I cud get my hands on.
Which one do you feels shoots better/softer?
They both shoot like a dream. The DA/SA trigger on the 75 is fantastic, but also the same with the SA pull of the FN. The FN, but only by a small margin? The reset, IMHO, on the FN is really short, I like that. The action on the 75 is just a tad bit smoother….
Idaho!
Not a Hi-Power at all!