Well i was talking about the value part that AMD brings to the table. Intel is still clinging on to the gaming crown until zen 3 ( I suppose ), but in the bang for the buck department it is clearly inferior to amd for now. It needs to come up with a good arquitecure and a improved node to compete, but until then ( and some Intel employees said as well ) that for now 14nm+++ is just simply not enough. I hope I answered the dilemma.
@@HardwareShenanigans My W-3175X beats the 3970X clock for clock with 4 less cores, TSMC's 7nm isn't enough to compete in workstation or gaming, maybe Cinebench which is useless.
That may be correct (I hope it is because I am in a way a Intel Fanboy) but the fact AMD has chips like the 3995WX on thr market and Intel does not makes a point in my view. I wasn't saying in the video that you should not buy intel I was just saying AMD is just the one to go with for consumers and super high end workstations. The W-3175X is a good chip but it still is expensive ( I think is more than the 3970X but i may be mistaken) and it lacks for example pcie gen 4 ( only is you use it ) and the platform (X599) has no future as Intel is not planning to release other cpus on that compared to trx40 which is suppose to support the 4th gen threadrippers with their ipc improvement. Hope I helped!
@@HardwareShenanigans AMD's architecture is unreliable and slow, also lacks AVX512 which is a massive help in alot of tasks. AMD has on average a 25-35ns higher memory latency, significantly slower L1 cache and worse IMC. TRX40 has around 20gb/s lower bandwidth than X299 at same frequencies, AMD is a joke. My L1 cache is 17tb/s, 3990X is barely 8-10tb/s... 3995WX is just Epyc with slightly higher clocks which as we know has barely any impact on performance due to AMD's architecture, AMD falls massively behind due to intercore latency which is higher than Intel's Xeon scalable and IF. In memory intensive applications AMD gets obliterated.
Sorry for answering so late, I had to do something. I see your point and I agree 100%. It is something that i missed in the video. I am no professional and just a computer geek and my opinion is mostly influenced by other youtubers. At the end of the day the consumer should buy what that makes the most sense for them and if that is intel then I am convinced it is a good buy. Thank you for the feedback. I will try to keep that in mind next time I do such video.
Good
It's clear you've never used a processor for anything other than Cinebench.
Well i was talking about the value part that AMD brings to the table. Intel is still clinging on to the gaming crown until zen 3 ( I suppose ), but in the bang for the buck department it is clearly inferior to amd for now. It needs to come up with a good arquitecure and a improved node to compete, but until then ( and some Intel employees said as well ) that for now 14nm+++ is just simply not enough. I hope I answered the dilemma.
@@HardwareShenanigans My W-3175X beats the 3970X clock for clock with 4 less cores, TSMC's 7nm isn't enough to compete in workstation or gaming, maybe Cinebench which is useless.
That may be correct (I hope it is because I am in a way a Intel Fanboy) but the fact AMD has chips like the 3995WX on thr market and Intel does not makes a point in my view. I wasn't saying in the video that you should not buy intel I was just saying AMD is just the one to go with for consumers and super high end workstations. The W-3175X is a good chip but it still is expensive ( I think is more than the 3970X but i may be mistaken) and it lacks for example pcie gen 4 ( only is you use it ) and the platform (X599) has no future as Intel is not planning to release other cpus on that compared to trx40 which is suppose to support the 4th gen threadrippers with their ipc improvement. Hope I helped!
@@HardwareShenanigans AMD's architecture is unreliable and slow, also lacks AVX512 which is a massive help in alot of tasks. AMD has on average a 25-35ns higher memory latency, significantly slower L1 cache and worse IMC. TRX40 has around 20gb/s lower bandwidth than X299 at same frequencies, AMD is a joke. My L1 cache is 17tb/s, 3990X is barely 8-10tb/s... 3995WX is just Epyc with slightly higher clocks which as we know has barely any impact on performance due to AMD's architecture, AMD falls massively behind due to intercore latency which is higher than Intel's Xeon scalable and IF. In memory intensive applications AMD gets obliterated.
Sorry for answering so late, I had to do something. I see your point and I agree 100%. It is something that i missed in the video. I am no professional and just a computer geek and my opinion is mostly influenced by other youtubers. At the end of the day the consumer should buy what that makes the most sense for them and if that is intel then I am convinced it is a good buy. Thank you for the feedback. I will try to keep that in mind next time I do such video.