ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ต.ค. 2024
- The coronation of King Charles takes place in less than two weeks, with Prince William, Catherine and Prince Harry among those attending while Meghan stays in the US.
To gauge the public mood ahead of the event, Panorama commissioned a YouGov opinion poll which has suggested public opinion about the British Royal Family is changing.
The results suggest broad support for keeping the monarchy, with 58% preferring it to an elected head of state - which was supported by 26%.
But the results found less than a third of 18 to 24-year-olds in the UK want the monarchy to continue.
It also found that almost half of those asked who were from ethnic minority backgrounds believe the Royal Family has a problem with race and diversity.
Please subscribe here: bit.ly/1rbfUog
#BBCNews
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 3 | 6 ต.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fTfIMFVjt_8/mqdefault.jpg)
If you can’t afford a house and will never likely to own your own home and you support the Royal family, and this greedy establishment, well there’s very little hope for you.
@jordan-zx7ny How many years have you people been telling us the rapture will happen this year/next year/soon? You haven't got it right yet. In fact, the bible actually says that anyone who tells you they know when the rapture is coming is a false prophet
@jordan-zx7nythe fuck
This greedy establishment costs you less than a cup of coffee a year, in 2021-2022 it was £1.29 given how much revenue is generated on the back of that via tourism etc that goes into the countries coffers not theirs I don’t think investing that cup of coffee a year is a bad deal.
@sue mount Do some basic research and you'll find that the cost of keeping the royal family costs more to the taxpayer than the amount they bring in via tourism. Also, the price of a cup of tea isn't much on its own but it totals around four hundred million a year. Four hundred million donated to a family of free loading, over privileged parasites. Meanwhile, many ordinary hardworking people are having to rely on foodbanks so that their kids don't have to go to school hungry.
Infantile take. I'm not a monarchist but they literally have nothing to do with inflation or the affordability of homes. Blame the banks, and the people who flooded the country with immigrants, which increased the price and demand for homes.
You can still visit a palace if no one lives inside it
You can also visit a country outside Great Britain and stay there.
Versailles is far more popular than Buck House.
@@ronakio Or perhaps you could move to a country that retains a monarch?
@@ronakio at least I don't have to pay for a multi-billionaire family
@@ronakio keep yer knickers on Ron 🩲
I live in another monarchy here in Europe, and the public is slowly becoming aware that a royal court is nothing else than a glorified recipient of social benefits.
where do u live?
I am a Japanese living in Japan, people who support Emperor family is decreasing rapidly, because of Akishinomiya Fumihito ,Emperor's brother has many scandals, such as woman, financial, harassment to staff. Many Japanese refuse Akishinomiya family to succeed the throne, and want them to exit.
@狸山狸子 yeah in a modern world it is silly. And when you think about where it came from, it's not like they were chosen in some cave thousand and thousands of years ago.
@MR X haven't you learned by adults never to tell a stranger where you live? 😄
@@citizenVader Ah I do apologise. I just had a read of your yt page and you are one of those people. 😁
he is widely despised
I think it's pretty obvious what's going on here. Queen Elizabeth II was beloved by almost everyone. King Charles on the other hand just simply isn't, and that's partly because of what he did to Diana. Another factor is Queen Elizabeth kept her views Well hidden. That's the complete opposite with King Charles. And finally (cough cough) Camilla.
@@paul7TM and William is just there till George takes over. Even he knows that.
Honestly, I think he SHOULD show his opinions more. After all, the Queen was from a different generation. He should of course hold back on some, but he’s dealing with a different country now and people always want to know what is on everyone’s minds.
@@paul7TM president Blair or should i say president Thatcher to get it across to you
@@danielwhyatt3278 I have nothing against him showing his opinions. He is human after all. Especially on issues such as climate change since he is the reason it's become mainstream. In fact, I really do hope he does talk and express more of his views on climate change in the years to come. Politics on the other hand, probably not. I think history is pretty clear what happens to royals when they express political opinions. (Aka the abdication)
You have to admit, for the first time in his 70 years, his reign has been him being relatively quiet. The only time we knew what he thought was "dear oh dear".
4 millions children in UK in poverty, more that 10 millions adults in poverty not being able to afford the daily basis of survival needs!!!! WOW 😢
Thank you ❤️
@@matt01506 Look at the figures for asylum seekers arriving in the UK over the last two decades. Then look at the numbers processed each year. Then you can see how this "crisis" has been manufactured by the government
@@matt01506 why are the brisish people so easily wound up by the media. People are so angry about a couple they've never met and a book they never read
What have done ? Time to give give give with love jn their hearts ❤
@@matt01506 like you put that German family in Buckingham Palace.
Andrew had an amazing ability to reach teenagers too.
HAHAHAHA FACTS!
Apply ice and cold water to that burn.
😂😂😂
Hahaha
😂😂🍕
A family of billionaire oligarghs exempted from laws and taxes, having a private holiday at the public's expense, while there are no money to pay nurses and teachers and every third child lives in powerty - inconceivable!!😢
billionaires? the royals are poor compared to Elon Musk
@@galatheumbreon6862 What are your sources? The true extent of all the assets of this family is a national secret. They don't pay taxes, so many of their wealth goes unaccounted. Unlike Elon Musk, who still needs to pay taxes and abide by laws against racism and sexism. And when Elon Musk's offspring gets their inheritance, the public won't pay from their pockets to throw up a national holiday with gilded carriages and stolen diamonds.
Elon Musk didn't get rich by selling people for centuries, by putting 90.000 Kenyans into death concentration camps, by stealing every valuable piece of history from all over the world, etc.
The ways the royal family became one are heinous, and if they had been a half-decent people, they should have given up any connections to that crimes and become normal business family, controlled by laws and paying taxes.
I'm happy to see so many British people being skeptical of the monarchy. It reflects positively on them.
The British monarchy should be abolished IMO.
Life for us wouldn’t change just UK will not be seen as special anymore. That’s it !
In Japan, if Clown Prince Akishinomiya Fumihito will succeed the throne, most of the Japanese people think monarchy should be abolished.
Clown Prince ))
The Japanese people are very wise.
An amazing ability to reach teenagers? She's thinking of Prince Andrew
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Nice one Shaun. 😄😄😄😄
"Has an amazing ability to reach teenagers" His brother has that too.
🤣🤣🤣 Ye do these clowns really deserve their status? I think not.
😂😂😂😂😂
Sure!😂
Is that like how he reached out to his teenage son when his mother died in the most horrendous way imaginable?
😁
Rapidly declining in popularity - much like the BBC is. Jimmy Saville anyone?
Saville was also mates and RELATED(as a b astard offspring) ofthe Royal Family..
See Thomas Sheridan channel who exposes this
charlie's "marriage adviser" Good choice charlie.
I don't want the monarchy to continue. A lot people don't. It makes me so angry that Charles was the Prince of Wales and he's not even Welsh. Same with Prince William and Kate. Also the fact that Andrew isn't in prison. For the disgusting things that he has done.
Prince Andrew is not in prison because the woman didn't pursue the matter.
@@sanaaa7047yes because the royal family paid out 10million of tax payers money to the victims
@@sanaaa7047 Prince Andrew shout be in prison tho. He is absolutely disgusting 🤢🤮
@@sanaaa7047 maybe he should go to America and find out? 🤔
@@hanselmansell7555 she didn't file a case against him she settled the matter so nothing there 🤷♀️
I couldn't be less interested
But here you are commenting?
@@DaDoM123 Having an opinion on Satanists, doesn't make you a devil worshipper.
@@1SeanPG That doesnt make sense. Do you understand english
As if we care what you think
A poll has gound support for the monarchy has, for the first time ever, fallen below 50%, yet the BBC isn't reporting it. Why?
Kings & Queens have no real power like old times.
Now they just get MILLIONS handed to them and go cut a few ribbons.
But there's another point to be aware of. Something that many people who live in a Monarchy system often forget. Calling a head of state King/Queen, or President of the Republic, doesn't change absolutely anything! The same palaces used by a Monarchy, become the residences of state of an elected Republic leader. We can see this in many countries around Europe. I'm Italian, and Italy once was a Monarchy, until 1946. The same huge palace inhabited by the Savoia royal family in Rome, The Quirinale, (the double bigger than Buckingham Palace) is now the humble 'house' of our President of the Republic. But apart from that, nothing has changed in terms of the money we pay to keep his Palace, servants footmen, lackeys, guards of honour with their horses, cars and motorcades of state, ceremonial butlers and so on...so isn't that much different than having a Monarchy. And I can assure you that our Republic costs us a lot more of money, than your Monarchy in the UK. And the same is, for Instance in Russia, where Putin officially lives in a Palace once owned by the Tzar, the Kremlin, or in France where President Macron live at the Elisee Palace, built by King Louis XV as a gift for his mistress Madame de Pompadour. So, even though the guy who lives in these palaces is not called "King" or "Queen" the rest is just the same, in term of costs and money we have to pay for their way of life. And sometimes, as here in Italy for instance, Republics costs us the triple (to say the least) than the British Monarchy. So, UK keep your Monarchy where it is now, for if you should get rid of it, Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle, will continue to cost you exactly the same, if not much more, becoming Presidential Palaces, rather than Royal Palaces. If UK should have a President, he would of course need a Palace in the Capital fit for his role, and what better place in London for a Presidential Palace, but Buckingham Palace? That's what happened here in Italy, the Quirinale is no more a royal Palace, but a Presidential Palace. But everything else it's exactly the same than before...so if you think that the Monarchy and its palaces and ceremonies are too expensive for you, think on what I've written.
The difference is that you could be elected to sleep in that palace or anyone else. The palace is yours, not theirs
Italian Presindents are elected even if not directly by the people . And they may not be relected after 7 years if they haven't been up to the task. They can't serve more than two terms anyway. Besides the staggering cost of the British monarchy ( and I'm counting only what people are allowed to know) is in no way comparable to the cost of presidents.
Presidents don't own palaces and duchies . The Quirinal is a property of the State.
We pay security, staff etc all right but presidents limit their role in representing the Country.
We don't have to pay security all the time they go somewhere just to wave and shake hands. That's no job.
@@serenafoglietti1455 Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and Holyrood Palace (the Monarch official residence in Scotland, not to be confused with Balmoral, which is a private property of the Windsor's Family since the days of Queen Victoria, and paid by the Royal Family's private fund) are the official residences of the Monarch, but they're not private properties of the Crown, they are owned by the State. They are given to the Monarch as official residences, but the real owner is the British State.
@@leonardobd6472 I'm talking about the costs difference between a Monarchy and a Republic. Not about the ereditary or elected power. And in both cases it is not the King or the President who detains the real power. But the Prime Minister and the Parliament. Don't forget that the UK is a CONSTITUTIONAL Monarchy, so the democracy and freedom of the people is not at stake at all. This is not the middle ages and the Monarch has not absolute power. The fact that UK's head of state is not elected doesn't mean nothing in practice. The same in Italy, where our President is elected by the Parliament, who in its turn is elected by the people, but his functions are much the same. In the ordinary life of the people this doesn't change absolutely nothing. And, just to point out, the British Monarchy economically sustains and patronise many charities and cultural foundations. I don't recall that the President of the Republic does the same. The Monarchy is near to the people, the King and before him his mother have visited every corner of their Nation, the President of the Republic in Italy has never come to visit my town. You know, the big difference between a Monarchy and a Republic is right this: a Monarch knows well that he was born to do that job. He's got no other choice, it's the entire purpose of his whole life. And he knows as well that his job is life long. So this makes a Monarch nearer to his people, 'cause his role doesn't have an expiration date. He must serve his people and his Country until his death. A President who's in charge for some years, and then he can retire to his private life, can't feel the same concern about the people of his Country, exactly because he's perfectly aware that his charge is temporary. With bad and good exception to both the systems of course. But a Monarch is like a father to his people, a President is like a nanny. A father is a father forever, a nanny is just a passing through figure. Furthermore a Monarch is not a politician. Though obviously he's got his own political opinions, which he must strictly keep for himself, he doesn't have a political background, he's never been associated with some political party. This makes a Monarch absolutely 'super partes', neutral and unbiased. The President, on the other hand, is a politician, he's been associated with a political party, and once in charge he should be neutral too, but is much more difficult for a politician to be so impartial. He'll always have sympathies for the parties to which he belonged. There are always some skullduggeries around a President. While a Monarch has nothing to do with the intriguing of the political world. So, for him it comes much more natural to be unbiased and near to his people. And just to point out, Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle are paid by the citizens taxes because, in case you aren't aware, they belong to the State, they're not private properties of the Royal Family. These palaces are the official residences of the Monarch, but the actual property is of the UK State. Precisely like the Quirinale here in Italy. Other Royal Family residences aren't paid with the people's money, since they are private properties of the Windsor Family, and they pay for that properties with their own private fund. To make it easier, if the King should decide to sell Balmoral Castle or Sandringham he could be perfectly entitled to do that, and the money he'd earned by the selling would go to his private fund. Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle could never been put on sale, since the actual owner of this palaces is not the King, Charles Windsor, but the Nation. Of which the King is the Head of State, and the official residences are 'loaned' to him by the Nation.
@@maxiillesi6748 The U.K doesn't have a constitution
About as popular as a fart in a spacesuit round my way.
Now that the Queen has gone it is the right time to end this nonsense.
Go to America then.
He's a billionaire who could pay for his own wedding
Great to know he connects with convicts, offenders and the jobless. That’s gonna help.
Get rid of the parasites
With all due respect to the royal family. I have BIGGER more important things to be doing and worry about than the royal family, like my career.
@Jordan You lot said the same about us in WEU at the millennium, and it didn't happen. What you just said is contradictory, because in Jesus words, it'll be unsuspected, like a thief in the night. Woe is me, the End is nigh. Woe is me, the End is even nigher!
jesus couldn't evrn made vatican priest'S repent for their child abuse crimes lol
Paying the bloomin' bills too.
@Jordan is this still a thing? I've been told about the end times back in the 80s, and so far nothing has happened 😂
@@stationsixtyseven67 yup!
Get rid of them. A waste of tax payers money.
They say they have difficulty to reach teenagers. Time to bring Andrew back.
😂😂😂😂
😅😅😅😅😅
The answer is clear. Get a homosexual black king and a transgender queen-consort. Modern sensibilities so demand. Anything less than that is offensive.
The persistence of monarchies is a source of embarrassment.
2:23 so does Prince Andrew… and look how that turned out.
popular ALL INSIDE a huge 300ft WICKER MAN being built in HASTINGS
If you polled those in the Commonwealth, the polling numbers would be far worse.
100% agree there sir , we live under a relic that serves no purpose other than to prop up wealth
It's not up to the Commonwealth if the King remain head of state for the U.K. The majority have their own leaders.
@@emj3161 Charles despises the 'commoners' who he is supposed to serve.
@@JohnofthefamilySmith did he tell you that over a pint?
@@emj3161 and that ignorance is the reason we're in this mess
They will never say that they are racist . Behind closed doors is something different.
Oh shut up
Why is it always about bloody racism?
Sure!!!😅
And yet he couldn't connect with his grieving teenage son, when his mother died in the most horrendous way imaginable!
My family come first. That family come last.
Then you are a traitor to the nation
We don’t know about his own father, but king Camilla is definitely the wedge that drove a father, his family against his son….
Nobody cares, down with monarchy
Not my king.
"There's not a racist drop of blood in the King." -- So his ancestors, and the DNA that runs in and allows him to claim the Crown, that began enslaving West Africans is a myth? Like get real.
I bet Charles whishes his best mate jimmy savile was at the coronation…..
The court Jester
I want the monarchy gone, the uk is on its knees, the monarchy cost us a fortune, and I’m 61 years old,,,
Speak for yourself I don’t want an American system
King Charles the last 👑
NOT gonna happen
Not the same since Queen Elizabeth died
One less to distribute the looted billions with. Result.
The Queen Elizabeth II was the Crown. Charles believes people forget
Lol. Yeah, that was funny
Not very I'd think. Time to go im afraid
Extremely popular because they’re still around. It’s a disgrace.
The truth is, the monarchy is irrelevant to most Brits. They're a tourist attraction essentially. They create fodder for the tabloid media and help raise money and bring attention to charitable causes but that's about it. If you abolished the monarchy, they'd still be VERY wealthy people. The UK will still have their history and traditions. They'll still have the castles and jewels. They just won't have to spend millions of taxpayers dollars supporting them. But they'll still have to shell out millions to maintain all the properties, unless they turn Buckingham Palace into Graceland.
They should turn all the palace into a combo of museum and affordable apartments and make rf work for living for free no salary the rf should be made to greet all people at the museum enterance and take pictures with tourist
I don't know. I liked Lizzie, she was alright but this Charles fella just gives me the creeps with his Richmond Sausage fingers you know?
BBC : We polled 4800 “carefully chosen” people 😂😂😂😂
Yep. That is why the numbers are so low for the monarchy. You need to really do a poll from the entire country, or it’s not a fair result.
@@danielwhyatt3278wow. Thank you for pointing that out even though that was the EXACT point of my post.
In statistics, results from this sample size is big enough to obtain meaningful data.
I hate the BBC, but on this they're pretty much spot on, if anything the poll is far too generous.
It's yougov, not the BBC. They're completely independent from the BBC afaik.
NOT MY KING
Charles couldn't "reach teenagers" with a Javelin missile. 😂
The only one reaching teenagers is prince Andrew 💀
@@Harryjw67 😂😂 Love it
when she said that he was great at reaching teenagers i thought, tell me things that never happened 😂
The idea of a "royal" family in today's time is ludicrous.
its a Honorable title for being the biggest gangster in the country still seam valid to me
@Grave Peril Ahh, yes. Non-existent nobility and honor. What was I thinking.
@@jasonrobertson8487 thats the veneer you put on top after you have killed the rest off
@@graveperil2169 As is tradition.
@@jasonrobertson8487 which i why it should be left in ripping it off jut releases the bloodshed
The whole concept of monarchy is obscene.
So is an orange president
@@anthonyhulse1248 yes, I agree, not sure it’s relevant though.
I agree. I think they should be removed. By any means necessary
@@tabularasa7775 as if those things don't exist in other countries even after being republics
@@tabularasa7775 well that would be hard to erase as it is part of the planet for centuries or even before Christ. Many civilizations in history have invaded and colonized others. We can't judge the past based on 2023 values or ideas. Even now the USA invaded Afghanistan and Iraq 🤷♀️
I don't have a problem with a European style monarchy, but we have a full blown feudal monarchy, vastly wealthy and owning huge amounts of land - a lot of which was stolen off others in the UK. Its time Wales got the crown lands back as Scotland did. Utterly ridiculous that the profits from offshore wind are directed to an unelected monarch. England is welcome to a feudal system if they choose to vote for it (the Tories!) but Wales and Scotland don't want that here. Its time for change - people are struggling to eat and heat their homes. Enough is enough, we're not serfs!
Please let Wales become independent and watch it burn without the money the rest of the UK put into it
@@davidnoelfranks1124 All western countries are going into a feudal system with the UN and WEF at the top of the pyramid.
I know, I've got to go count grain in the Tithe barn with Baron Farquar in the morning.
The King holds a weekly Audience with the Prime Minister to discuss Government matters. The Audience is entirely private. Though The King remains politically neutral on all matters, he is able to 'advise and warn' his ministers - including his Prime Minister - when necessary.
@@cdean2789 Political neutrality? Please. Who still buys it in this day and age?
When Scotland leaves the UK I hope its a republic.
The monarchy is not going to make Britain 'great'. The people might do that, not the monarchy.
I trust the monarchy more than the government atm.
Yep. I have 400 bodyguards everywhere I go. People throw eggs at me. I wonder if they like me?
They need to start paying back some of the benifits they stole 😂
ATTENTION!!! ATTENTION!!!
PLEASE, VOTE!!!
MONARCHY OR REPUBLIC
1) IF YOU WANT TO VOTE FOR MONARCHY, SO PUT LIKE TO THIS COMMENT.
2) IF YOU WANT TO VOTE FOR REPUBLIC, JUST WRITE A COMMENT TO THIS COMMENT.
Down with the Crown.
Hello pretty 👋, how are you doing today. My pleasure connecting with you.
The crown always wins
Having a King is 10 better than having a complete nobody as President.
He’s not king he’s a member of the WEF, and head of the uk corporation. The man is a fraud
I always thought the Monarchy existed for the sole purpose of keeping a centuries long tradition, not because it is actually beneficial to economy or society. If they start changing and “adapting” to the modern times, that is literally breaking the tradition it kept for all these years. The Monarchy would immediatelly lose its only remaining reason for existing.
I mean the monarchy has changed a lot with history anyway. When the Normans first invaded there were no checks on the king's power until the Magna Carta. Then after the civil war and the death of Oliver Cromwell Charles II was only invited to return as long as he didn't interfere with parliament like his dad did before he was executed. A few decades later parliament installed an entirely new king with the glorious revolution and made it so the monarchs had very little political power. A few decades later again and George III made a deal with parliament where his debts would be paid in exchange for parliament receiving 3/4 of the income of the crown estate. Having the monarchy transition into more of a public institution than a private one has been entirely in keeping with tradition for centuries.
I mean the monarchy has changed a lot with history anyway. When the Normans first invaded there were no checks on the king's power until the Magna Carta. Then after the civil war and the end of Oliver Cromwell's republic Charles II was only invited to return as long as he didn't interfere with parliament like his dad did before he was executed. A few decades later parliament installed an entirely new king with the glorious revolution and made it so the monarchs had very little political power. A few decades later again and George III made a deal with parliament where his debts would be paid in exchange for parliament receiving 3/4 of the income of the crown estate. Having the monarchy transition into more of a public institution than a private one has been entirely in keeping with tradition for centuries.
The Monarchy no longer holds overt political power but it does serve as a unifying symbol for the country. Not something people will appreciate during times of peace but I suggest you listen to the Queen's WW2 speeches.
It's not the only reason
Stop paying taxes to these supremacists.
I didn't vote for him!
Give them Balmoral, cash in all their land and riches, build a few million affordable homes, turn Buck Palace into a highly lucrative museum and then let's all have a party 🥳 🎉 👍
Dont care for them dont give a toss about them
Monarchy is Disney for adults and should be abolished
I list in Western Canada and I can't even think of a time in my life the Royals visited here.
I really never got the idea of praising a family that enslaved your ancestors.
It's also funny how it's always the older people defending the family not being racist- very telling!
I never understood why after independence you kept the monarchy its along way to go to cut a ribbon
For starters they neeever enslaved Canada, and second they don’t have a racism problem. They’re a family, NOT A GOD DAMN GOVERNMENT THAT NEEDS TO FOLLOW SOME KIND OF A MANIFESTO.
Cringe
🙄🙄🙄
@@benwagner2000 Yes- defending the family is pretty cringe I must say.
SImping for millionaires with blood on their hands while we cant even afford to heat our homes
❤️❤️❤️
well that your hard luck
Pull yourself up by the bootstraps.
@@martin3203 yeah just like the king who was born into one of the most wealthy families around, makes sense
@@Blackfyre741 I suppose I should have added a "/s", my apologies.
A lot of people 😅 just don't get why we have royalty in the uk. " Democracy doesn't work sometimes." Sometimes, people need leadership without political ideologies ! History proves this a lot.
You know you are still a democracy? The royal family are just tourism grabbers.
yes, and thats why we have other means of getting shit done than by pure democracy. we have law and order and the people we elect should make sure that the people dont forget about said laws and orders
They say that the royal family might have a problem with diversity? Its because of the royal family this country is so diverse in the first place. Our colonial past was all in the name of the monarchy
Crooks and non achievers
Tell us about how close Charles is to Klaus Schwab… then ask us again.
Rid of the monarchy!! Get rid of these free loaders!!
And the award for "Most successful adulterous couple" goes to.. ☺️
how will they be popular there when bbc sent them overseas to make colonies and bring gold and stones?
Nah most colonisation was the fault of the government.
Charles will bring the RF down, he needs to start keeping his political views to himself , he needs to take a leaf out if his mum's book and stay neutral.
Almost as unpopular as the BBC and just as out of touch.
I think it's worth mentioning that for a lot of younger people, myself included, it doesn't really matter if Charles does or doesn't connect with us as a person or a monarch. The problem is that he's a monarch. It's not as easy to control information now the internet is around, and for me after seeing how things like the Duchy of Cornwall and Lancaster operate (predominantly as the primary funds for the King) and how exploitative those models are, as well as things like the paradise papers scandal, the whole issue with prince andrew, and the treatment of Harry and Meghan, it makes the monarchy seem dated, out of touch, and more than anything, functionally useless. Why have a king when you could have someone do the same job, only you get to choose them? I far prefer people like Michael D. Higgings to someone like the King.
It mattets when we pay for them to be carried in gilded carriages loaded with stolen diamonds across the closed London while nurses haven't seen pay rise for decades; when they don't pay taxes or don't abide by human laws, allowing them molest children with impunity and depriving their staff all normal human rights; when their palaces and stables and hunting dogs are maintained from our pockets. I don't want to pay for that!
Harry & Megan lied and now have made them more popular especially in America so it’s touch and go. If we had an elected head of stated it wouldn’t make a bit of difference to us. At least it keeps our country unique
India should rememberr the Atificial famine that took more than 10 million innocent people die of hunger.
This reality of barbaric rule of British monarchy. This is nothing less than holicaust vut never depicted in the same depth why?
Only because it happened in colony and people who perished are not white?
Btitish barbaric traditions continue but today it is the commin british poor who take the brunt of cruelty. 189 million for coronation..
Previouly Brttish had Indians africans to plunder loot and kill. Old habits die hard hard so they have kill someone bith brutality. So they chose British poor to perish in poverty. Holocaust of different proportion and dimension. Apartheid on poor Brithishers.
Sarve Janah Sukhino Bhavanthu 🙏
As popular as a pork chop at a ber mitzvah..if Charlie horse doesn't hand off to will and kate in the next few years then he will be the last monarch of England!!.♥️🇬🇧🇺🇦
Very, very popular with the silent majority .
bro you are literally from ''the people''
By the silent majority, you I would imagine you mean the Millions of Sheep.
52,000 views, 920 thumbs up. Yeah, real popular.
Let's stop keeping the royal family
Charles capable of making connections? BS! This is a royal spokes person. She has to say this. She’s paid to say this or at least obliged. If Charles had such a great charisma, he wouldn’t have lost Dianna. Dianna would not have shown brighter. If he had just Average charisma he could overcome the boo’s King Camilla gets. If he was smart, he would step aside and let his son ascend the throne instead of him.
You ,as a nation, you are moraly obliged to provide the essential food and standard of living for your citizen. Not doing it means that your propose as a ruler and governance is failed drastically!!! It is shame that you, as a nation , you don't have the capability to eradicate your poverty in your kingdom!!! It's a shame , it really sad...
I think it’s inevitable that a reckoning will come. William and maybe his son George will have to contend with a completely different world once or rather if they ever assume the throne.
Doubt it
Yes I think there might be a King George but in a much more low key form
I can understand why young people especially find the monarchy irrelevant. We live in unstable times politically, war has returned to the European continent, our NHS and public services have been slashed to expand a profiteering private sector, everything is so expensive and we're getting less in either quantity or quality for more money too. Unless you're very lucky to get a high-paying job, you can't live prosperously enough to buy a house, raise a family and make the same kind of money our parents made without hustling in content creation, successful crypto trading or being lucky to come from a family that can pass a lot of assets down to you. Who would want to celebrate a nation like that? There's also the anti-democratic nature of it. BUT, I do support the monarchy, because I think getting rid of it would be a similar expression of public frustration to Brexit. Yes it would upset some toffs, but it would strip us of a lot of our global soft power and it would hand power to an elected President who would no doubt end up being a corrupt Tory anyway. Is that really what we want? I'm grateful to have a head of state that can rise above all that, but they are essentially slaves to the pressure of newspapers and I want to see both them and us freed from that. The papers are the real entity running this country into the ground, and they don't tolerate us having the option to vote for a government that would go against their interests, so they slander them until they're ultimately rejected by the electorate.
I am a foreigner living in the uk. Let the royal family be, why should you lot stop your culture and your way because of us immigrants. That’s how I see it. That’s how I would see it if this was my country. Keep the royal family, embrace your culture, and don’t let non-natives decipher YOUR culture.
Charles wants to cull the world of what he calls 'useless eaters' Is that what you support?
It's a the same with other countries. I get why some cultural things can be problematic, but I don't want to go to a Muslim country and not feel Muslim influence or a Buddhist country and not experience Buddhist culture. If I ever go to Japan I wouldn't want volunteer Geisha's all banned just because they are misogynistic or old fashioned. I think representative kings and queens are quite interesting in the 21st century providing they have checks in power and don't interrupt fair elections.
It's not just immigrants...if you watched this video, young, white British people don't support the Royal Family. Spending so much money on the Coronation during a cost-of-living crisis seems obscene.
@@DrT0705 it’s mainly immigrants.
Im British and I hate em...
I disagree anyone should be born into Privilege like that while we are Gaslit and told we are "free and equal"..
Clearly some are more "free and equal" than others
What can you say about a family and relations of billionaires who do the bare minimum. They need to go the way of the do do bird. Enough already.
It's 2023 can we not leave princes and princesses to Disney?
Spongers and tax Dodgers
King Reset and the pizza gang 👑🦎🏴☠️
In this house, not popular at all. We're republicans. I'll be wearing my 'Not my king' badge, metaphorically if not all the time literally, on Black Saturday.
Isn't Charliie king of wef?
So after the last three years, do you think he is popular?
Unelected vanity group who have destroyed all countries they govern.
On purpose. The word for it is Treason.
Not very popular, I tell you.
we love the king but miss the queen
"We" ? Speak for yourself. Couldn't care less about any of these over privileged, pointless freeloading parasites, including the queen.
@@Mark.H3721 majority of english people loves royal family
@@mariaoh3167 And you know that because....??
Down with the monarchy!
Wait times spanning months and years for medical and mental health appointments. I know people struggling to get dentist appointments for their 3 year old children. All because there's just not enough money for funding.
But suddenly there's £50million in taxpayers money to put a HAT on a MAN.
Popular enough for certain people to be happy to pay for a coronation during a cost of living crisis.
Yes, Idiots.
Hire Charles Dance for the Trooping and State Opening. Keep Anne in a consultancy role and fire the rest.
Down with the crown, rotten to it's very core #NotMyKing #AbolishTheMonarchy
The time for kings and queens are over
The time for the BBC is over
They think the Royal family are racist and where has this come about from? Let me guess Megan's big mouth. The woman who was horrible to her own staff and they made multiple complaints against Megan about her attitude and the way she spoke to people was disgusting. And how can people say there are not enough ethnic minorities working in Buckingham palace. When have these people last walked inside Buckingham palace and had a look at the staff never but why is it when Prince Philip or the Queen died can't remember which one it was for a fact but I'm sure I remember seeing a man of collar with a woman bringing out the sign to say they had passed away. And the other people that work inside the palace that you don't see at all it aint the palace's fault if there is not any ethnic minorities applying for the job.
@Douglas Macgregor know thank you. The US can keep them both. She can run for president of the US in the next general election.