I tried it as well. It works in a very interesting way. I set up with my back line on IWB And on the wings where the DMs are I had them as complete wing backs. I came 6th with Liverpool second season
I’d love to see a tactic forcing in as many “unusual” roles as possible - Trequartista, Enganche, Wide Target Forward, Raumdeuter, Libero, Regista, Segundo Volante etc. no double roles anywhere in the team and see if you can get a team to win the Champions League
I actually think that extreme tactics like this are more suited for lower league since opposition is bad. It's like boxing with a hammer,if neither of you can throw punches, you can still blow him out with the hammer
I done something like this before, it was 5 treq i used, 1 up top 4 behind, 3 at the back with wide cb and ball playing defender on cover in the middle, 2 registas in cdm, basically just who can score most lol possession stats were fun too.
im playing fm12, and tried to re-create this, with my awful celta vigo side. its not actually going that badly. im playing four treqs, as you cant play them in the "winger" slots. its still quite attacking. ive only suffered one heavy 1-5 at home. drawn most, with goals being scored (2-2, 3-3). you never know quite whats gonna happen. i might move a treq to a centre def, so you have that 5-5 split, and see if its just a good attacking tactic
This "test" you made (if we can call it that) is very interesting, FM should add a roles that kinda play like trequartistas, in the sense of roaming from positions and go near the player that has the ball but that would actually defend like other "normal/standard" roles and with that we could finally create a tactic a lot more close and accurate to a "relationist" style of play. That would be my wet dream at least xD And also, make something so we can desable the new positional play they added in this fm or something like that, so that relationism would actualy happen
@@StingerNeilD maybe but I don't it will be now, I think we have to wait a bit more, relationism is not main stream yet and the FM team seems to be focused in the new engine updates for the 25 and maybe even 26, and these roles would be a kinda major change in the way the engine works so maybe in the future
We definitely need a tactic with 4 wing backs
🫡
Yes
Tried it, 2 wing back on de
2 other wing back on at, with 2 volante in a DEEP 442 ... definetly worth making a video on
And mezalas
I tried it as well.
It works in a very interesting way.
I set up with my back line on IWB
And on the wings where the DMs are I had them as complete wing backs.
I came 6th with Liverpool second season
3CBs, 3DMs, 2WBs, 2FBs. Any goal conceded is an instant loss
2:15 This geniuenly looks like what Southgate was doing at the last 10 minutes of England Slovakia game
😂😂😂😂
Bold of you to assume he was doing anything
@@somtooosmond9853 I mean tbf he did sub on like 3 or 4 10s
I’d love to see a tactic forcing in as many “unusual” roles as possible - Trequartista, Enganche, Wide Target Forward, Raumdeuter, Libero, Regista, Segundo Volante etc. no double roles anywhere in the team and see if you can get a team to win the Champions League
Automatic like on the video haha. So glad I made that comment cause this was so much fun to watch.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I was depressed for you when you got sacked, I was invested in the story of the 6 Treqs.
Thank you amigo
I actually think that extreme tactics like this are more suited for lower league since opposition is bad. It's like boxing with a hammer,if neither of you can throw punches, you can still blow him out with the hammer
😂😂👏 love that
Love the videos! I'd love to see a target man violence video, see how many headed goals you can get in a season
Can you make a formation work where 8 players occupy the flanks. So 4 players on each side occupying FB,WB, Midfield, Winger.
I've done something similar in the past
Let me see if I can redo it
We REALLY should be able to more specifically define in-possession and out-of-possession roles.
STOP GIVING GUARDIOLA IDEAS
😂😂😂
Feel like the tactic would've been better with either a regular back 4 or back 3 with wide cbs
Back 3 maybe but a back 4 would have meant zero midfield
Possibly back 4 with 2 inverted full backs and 2 liberos?
@@cade3911 or to cb and inverted wing backs
I love midfielders - so maybe a tactic where all outfield players are in the midfield
Something like 5 Mid (3 MC, ML, MR), 3 AM (AML, AMC, AMR), 2 DM
we definitely need 8 wings - backs
Let me know how that works out boss
I done something like this before, it was 5 treq i used, 1 up top 4 behind, 3 at the back with wide cb and ball playing defender on cover in the middle, 2 registas in cdm, basically just who can score most lol possession stats were fun too.
Yours sounds more sensible 😂
How do I follow 6 Trequartistas? With SEVEN trequartistas!
Im just gonna say Raumdeuters and leave
Hit and run
It's cool to see that one can use off-meta tactics and still achive good results! FM players are guilty of optimizing too much!
Yes, true, there's for sure nothing meta about this 😂
Brilliant 👏🏻
I am going try it With Wrexham see how it goes btw I like watching all your tactic videos 👍👍
Good luck! You're brave
This video STINGS!
We want this from Secondyellowcard
a real man wouldve used 8
Can't argue
try a 5-5 with 3 half backs
What's the player instructions
Treqs marking DMs and FBs
im playing fm12, and tried to re-create this, with my awful celta vigo side. its not actually going that badly. im playing four treqs, as you cant play them in the "winger" slots. its still quite attacking. ive only suffered one heavy 1-5 at home. drawn most, with goals being scored (2-2, 3-3). you never know quite whats gonna happen. i might move a treq to a centre def, so you have that 5-5 split, and see if its just a good attacking tactic
Fm12! Old school love that
@@StingerNeilD yeah, i play 10, 11, 12, sometimes 13. the versions after that, i dont like. PS, liked the david brent clip in this...oh ffs! 🤣
Honestly I don't like most of the memes in these videos, you could simply just not add them
It was just the video series type. They'll not be there in future vids. Thanks for the feedback
No Center back Challenge
Evil
Wild stuff ❤😂
i dont thin you need so many defensiv players get another trequartista in
You're right I should be ashamed 😂👍
trequartistas
tre
quart
quart is almost quatr
3 and 4
do 12 trequartistas
Pure evil....
Would love a double IWB (fullbacks) and WB/CWB (wingbacks) tactic
Try 3 CMs on attack. Or 3 Shadow Strikers.
Everyone is interchangeable and therefore disposable. A manager's dream!
This "test" you made (if we can call it that) is very interesting, FM should add a roles that kinda play like trequartistas, in the sense of roaming from positions and go near the player that has the ball but that would actually defend like other "normal/standard" roles and with that we could finally create a tactic a lot more close and accurate to a "relationist" style of play. That would be my wet dream at least xD
And also, make something so we can desable the new positional play they added in this fm or something like that, so that relationism would actualy happen
Maybe in 25?
@@StingerNeilD maybe but I don't it will be now, I think we have to wait a bit more, relationism is not main stream yet and the FM team seems to be focused in the new engine updates for the 25 and maybe even 26, and these roles would be a kinda major change in the way the engine works so maybe in the future
Maybe Sheffield United should had played with 6 trequartisters, they would have conceded less goals
😂😂😂
What skin do you use mate?
Tato 👍
Would playing a lower pace not have made way more sense?
Trying to avoid turnovers and counters?
Possibly mate yeah. There wasn't a lot of sensible thinking involved
Insanity. I feel lke this game doesnt punish reckless stupidity enough sometimes though. 😂
I would agree
They can't handle the truth
The most i used was 4... Lol
maybe 5 treqs with two half backs will give it the perfect balance for next time!
Far to sensible thinking that
I think marking certain areas like CMs would have promoted them to run back more. Going to try this myself with Rangers.
I did 😂 I said that in the vid
@@StingerNeilD I knew you did some positions but didn't realise you did centre of the park as well! Sorry was too busy thinking about my own save 😅
Madman!
recently discovered your channel and I’m loving it, it’s like a madman cooking
Welcome aboard!
use 8 playmakers
Great video!
Glad you enjoyed it
First