2022 Outback Wilderness vs. 2022 Forester Wilderness | Subaru's battle in the wilderness

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Subaru's sneaking into the off-road game with two new Wilderness models
    Sell your car 100% online. Get the best offer instantly from thousands of dealers: cargur.us/PBmK_
    Subaru drivers have been kitting out their cars to go further off-road for years. Now, with the 2022 Outback Wilderness and the 2022 Forester Wilderness, the company will do it for you. Whether you prefer the smaller footprint of the Forester or demand the turbocharged engine in the Outback, these cars are great options for drivers looking for a vehicle that suits their adventure lifestyle.
    For more information on the 2022 Subaru Forester Wilderness, read our full review: cargur.us/QpZ3z
    For more information on the 2022 Subaru Outback Wilderness, read our full review: cargur.us/Qv57z
    Shop for a Subaru Forester on CarGurus: cargur.us/KgPSG
    Shop for a Subaru Outback on CarGurus: cargur.us/G_nwF
    Similar Test Drive Reviews:
    Subaru Forester Wilderness: • 2022 Subaru Forester W...
    Subaru Outback Wilderness: • 2022 Subaru Outback Wi...
    Jeep Wrangler Vs. Ford Bronco: • 2021 Ford Bronco Vs Je...
    Ford Bronco Sport: • 2021 Ford Bronco Sport...
    Hyundai Tucson: • Comfortable and compet...
    Jeep Compass: • An off-roading compact...
    Kia Sportage: • Kia's glow-up continue...
    Nissan Rogue: • 2021 Nissan Rogue Revi...
    Presenter: Clifford Atiyeh
    Cinematography: www.VennCreativeMedia.com
    #Subaru #Outback #Forester #Wilderness
    --------
    0:00 the Outback and the Forester
    0:36 Exterior Styling
    2:39 The Angles
    2:55 Forester Driving Dynamics
    7:24 Outback Driving Dynamics
    12:29 Drivetrain Stats
    13:42 Inside the Forester
    15:42 Inside the Outback
    16:59 Pricing
    17:18 Final Thoughts
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 254

  • @cocafan33
    @cocafan33 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Love my forester wilderness. While it’s not quick, I think you really over exaggerated it’s slowness.

  • @joshuamoninger2792
    @joshuamoninger2792 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    To say there is little difference vs your friend's old 2000 Forester is BS and overly dramatic. I just upgraded from a 2001 Forester to a 2022 Forester Wilderness and there the '22. is WAY faster, smoother, more refined, more fuel efficient, more comfortable, and better in every single measure by a HUGE margin. Would I prefer it be offered with the turbo? Sure, but it isn't nearly as slow as you suggest with your description.

  • @BrentODell
    @BrentODell ปีที่แล้ว +40

    It's important to remember that just because a car with more power exists, that doesn't make the less powerful car bad. I used to drive a 1975 BMW 2002 tii, which was a small, light, nimble car, and considered quite quick and sporty. I never tested 0-60 times, but according to those who did, it was about 9 seconds. I've seen other reviews of the Forester Wilderness do it in 8. So.... it's quick enough for me.

    • @jeebus022
      @jeebus022 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yeah, the guy was really overreacting, making it sound like the Forester is just a hair above a horse drawn carriage. Like fella, calm down.

    • @louis0187
      @louis0187 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seriously, this guy was an ass.

    • @AB-jk7tw
      @AB-jk7tw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We find the car OK around town but when the kids and luggage are in the car is very slow and almost dangerous when merging or trying to pass anything.

    • @johnw9177
      @johnw9177 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree. I’m inclined to purchase the Forester because I’m done dealing with turbo engines.

  • @mdhonze
    @mdhonze 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I got the Forester because if one is going to prioritize power and torque only, then Subaru is not the right choice. I had an Outback and it's too long and too wide and it's a sedan and a wagon and a SUV all at the same time and that's not a plus for me. The Forester in practical life if perfect for me. But that's me, I've had both. Thanks for the honest review.

  • @SD-lm1jy
    @SD-lm1jy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I'm an owner of a Wilderness OB. Its my 3rd OB and I'm loyal to the brand, Subaru has never let me down. I will say, the turbo is incredible on the OB. The acceleration and low end torque is amazing. I honestly could never get back in a 2.5 naturally aspirated again, the feel is night and day.

    • @Totosubie
      @Totosubie ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I did not believe it after I drove both, now I am strongly agreeing with you, 2.5 NA sucks no shitt, 2.4T is the king and always the priority

    • @SSemi1
      @SSemi1 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Those turbos put a lot of stress on the engine and are pain to maintain. For all cars really

    • @ericf5976
      @ericf5976 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@SSemi1 Definitely! It is a fact that a naturally aspirated engine will last longer and be overall more reliable than a turbo charged engine. Turbo’s put accelerated strain on an engine and internals will wear out faster than a naturally aspirated engine. If I invest in a car that I plan on keeping for a very long time you can bet it will never be a turbo!

    • @robob221
      @robob221 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SSemi1 technically true but it depends on your use case and how long you own your cars. Insignificant for lease or financing 3-5 years.

    • @xfozzypx115
      @xfozzypx115 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ericf5976 That’s incredibly false.. as a owner of multiple turbo vehicles that have made it over 200k it’s all about how you maintain said vehicle… this isn’t the 90s anymore turbo technology has come a long way and these engines are built for it. “Side note the 3 I’ve owned were Saabs all but one made it to 200k on original turbo”

  • @jeffer1101
    @jeffer1101 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I find most reviewers put too much weight in more powerful engines. While there's no doubt the 2.4T has much more power and torque, I never found the Forester "slow". I would say it is adequate. The turbo engine adds a lot of cost, complexity and fuel consumption to the ownership experience. Also, moving to the Outback means a completely different shaped vehicle that is also much larger (outside dimensions especially). Both are good vehicles, but kind of their own thing. We chose the Forester because it fits in the garage a bit better and we really liked the look of it, the visibility when in it, the more simple controls (I assume newer models may move to the large screen as that seems to be the way everything is going) and just the way it works as a daily driver. It's also well priced. We traded in our 2016 Kia Sorento Turbo, and while it had more power, we don't really miss it. Half the time, you're stuck in traffic anyway, so the extra cost is wasted. If you are shopping in this segment, ignore the power numbers on paper and just drive the vehicles and pick the one that matches your needs as a whole. Maybe you do like the extra power, but you like everything else in the a vehicle with less power. You'd likely be happiest in something that better matches your needs than sacrificing daily utility and enjoyment for extra power you may rarely use anyway.

  • @cujo8585
    @cujo8585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Just picked up the Outback Wilderness 2 weeks ago and I’m totally in love with it! The turbo was a definite for me, everything else that comes with it was icing on the cake.

  • @HomesteadOnThePreserve
    @HomesteadOnThePreserve 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love your videos especially anything Outback.
    It's been 3 months and my special order OBW in Geyser Blue is due any day now!
    Keep these fun and informative videos coming our way!

  • @user-jm5dw3gm8y
    @user-jm5dw3gm8y 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    You don’t want a Outback if its loaded up with people and equipment like he says. The Forester can carry 147 lbs more payload than the Outback.
    When I added up the passengers, equipment, etc I needed that extra 147 pounds. It drives fine in altitude and loaded… plus that turbo engine and oil runs hotter… would be concerned about engine in the long- run. The Forester also has a transmission water cooler, not sure about the Outback.
    Also watch sarah-n- tuned , she reviewed both 2022 models. And the Forester was able to climb the hill,right away,but the Outback tried several times and couldn’t do it. Maybe they fixed the issue on newer Outback models but it looked like the wheels quit spinning on the hill.
    Another thing it easier to load a bike into the back because it is a wider entry and taller, prefer the load ability of the Forester.

  • @trojanmoondoggie4582
    @trojanmoondoggie4582 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    The turbo definitely has its advantages, but Subaru drivers know that going in.
    I just had my Subaru Forester delivered, and I am very pleased with it.
    It accelerates perfectly fine getting onto the freeway, and does so without me having to floor it.
    Possibly it will be lacking some power when I head up into the mountains, but I have friends who have a Forester, and they said it's perfectly fine. Considering there are a ton of Foresters in the mountain communities, they can't be that bad.
    Furthermore, it feels way more solid on the road than I would gather it to be from this review. And I have none of that pitching and rolling mentioned either. In addition, the steering is perfectly responsive.
    Maybe I'm just lucky but it is a great ride, and very solid and connected to the road.
    As for the interior... it's great.
    I get why some people like the Outback. Some people, like this dude, need a more stylish interior, and having that large infotainment system gives him more of that Tesla-like, slab of a computer tablet slapped on the dash which so many want nowadays.
    But in all my investigating of both Subarus, most reviewers would disagree with what's being said here about its functionality, saying that the Outback infotainment center is way less responsive and more distracting to operate. It may "look good" for those who are looking for style, not function, but it doesn't quite measure up to the Forester with its more nostalgic knobs and controls, in addition to the touch screen.

    • @BaldKiwi117
      @BaldKiwi117 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I actually hopped on the 2023 forester because I knew the 2024 would come with the awful giant TV screen infotainment.

    • @azackmatoff2570
      @azackmatoff2570 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed, I own 2016 Forester, just love it. Yes, the HP is less, but it's OK, not too bad. Can go anywhere I wish though))

    • @Toffee99
      @Toffee99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Driving a car feel.. outback
      Driving an suv feel.. forester

    • @alankoszyk3656
      @alankoszyk3656 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Right on dude. I have 23 forester wilderness and I LOVE IT. I will say that traveling 70+ and trying to pass cars is tricky.
      Loved the Outback and forester but the na won me over

  • @AlaskaErik
    @AlaskaErik ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I have the Forester Wilderness and it works just fine for me. I thought I wanted the 12 inch screen, but many OB owners hate how you have to use the screen for so many adjustments. The 8 inch screen and knobs and switches/buttons works perfect. While it isn't a powerhouse, I've never felt like I needed a lot more power. The ride suits me just fine, but my other car is a pickup truck. And I just sold my Jeep Wrangler, so the ride is quite luxurious by comparison. My wife has an Outback Touring and I still like my Forester better. It sits higher up and is perfect for my 6' 2" frame. I have no regrets about getting my Forester Wilderness.

    • @MountainPerson
      @MountainPerson ปีที่แล้ว

      The engine is terrible. I can’t imagine anyone enjoying a forester without a turbo.

    • @AlaskaErik
      @AlaskaErik ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@MountainPerson I enjoy mine just fine.

    • @oscarchi6502
      @oscarchi6502 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The engine isn't terrible. Wife had a forester before her obw, I have an sti. The forester goes just fine with what it has.

    • @BaldKiwi117
      @BaldKiwi117 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@MountainPersonactually the engine is fine. Slow but fine.

    • @paktimkwan4203
      @paktimkwan4203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was a double deck bus driver in Hong Kong, now I own a Forester Touring . I find it is good in speed for me.

  • @Armondahad
    @Armondahad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One thing I'm surprised I don't hear many people talk about in these comparison videos is the extra headroom when you have the seats down in the Forester. My partner and I went with the Forester Wilderness in part for this reason (as well as price and other reasons) because we really want to get more into camping in our car and will really appreciate being able to sit up easier.

  • @sarahgonzales2104
    @sarahgonzales2104 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the reviews and in depth comparisons!! Got to ask, were you near Southbridge MA or Charlton MA power lines for the test ride off road? Looks just like some old stomping grounds of mine! 😁

  • @kuvtuagnoobs
    @kuvtuagnoobs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are absolutely right in that the Wilderness handles just like any Outback. I went from a 2017 3.6R to a 2020 Limited XT and then now I own the 2022 OBW. It takes a bit getting used to the lift on the OBW (you do definitely notice it right, but after a while, you don't notice it anymore). The lift definitely does give it a trucky feeling, which isn't bad. Still love the car.

  • @jonathanhansen1222
    @jonathanhansen1222 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have a 2021 Forester (base model) and love it. It's my first Subaru & previously I had a Toyota Matrix that I drove to 255,000 mi; it was roughly the same size as the Forester. But you're exactly right, the Forester is *slow* and not flashy. But I got it for the AWD, which has been fantastic. I live where there is a lot of snow and ice several months of the year, and it hasn't had a single problem navigating that kind of terrain. I've off-roaded some incredibly rocky terrain and it handled everything fine. The gas mileage is surprisingly pretty good, as I drive it to work a few days a week and average 31mpg. I've loaded up sheets of plywood and lumber on crossrails connected to the roof rack and even with freeway driving haven't had any problems. It's a great little crossover!

  • @hunterphan5506
    @hunterphan5506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just from the photos, the Forester is the winner for me due to the physical knobs for controls. It’s a wishful thinking, but if Subaru blessed us with a manual transmission, I’d buy it in a heartbeat. For now, I am stay with my 2018 Forrester MT until it gives up on me.

  • @raitis2112
    @raitis2112 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have a 2020 outback strange Ridge trim for a year now and I love it. Power is not the best with natural 2,5L but it is enough to get around.

  • @Brian_Fantastic
    @Brian_Fantastic ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I had an opportunity to take extended test drives of the 2021 Forester and Outback this year, and my money still goes to the Forester. I really hated how the climate controls were integrated in the infotainment system, I'd much rather have physical knobs that I can adjust without looking down. I ordered my '23 Forester Wilderness yesterday and I couldn't be more excited.

    • @Sawartist
      @Sawartist ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I just bought a new 2022 Forester Wilderness and I love it. I watched so many TH-cam reviews that mentioned that it was low on power. I bought it without a test drive and on the ride home from the dealership I was shocked by it's acceleration, quietness and responsiveness. I also found that I really like the CVT transmission as well. I'm glad that I didn't listen to all the negative comments that I found on so many of the TH-cam videos.

    • @Milosmetal
      @Milosmetal ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Sawartist same. Owned the Forester for 2 months and these reviews are terrible. I jump into fast traffic extremely quick and usually have to slow down. I’d say these reviewers are reading a boring script and are mediocre drivers. Forester tows 3,000 lbs and is geared for that. Amazing vehicle and DOES have great power.

    • @andersjeppsson8499
      @andersjeppsson8499 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Relieved to hear. Waiting on
      My Forrester W ‘23 with 4 weeks to go. :-)

    • @huazhang3013
      @huazhang3013 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      same here. I hate that stupid big screen.

    • @ajfam871
      @ajfam871 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I plan to do the same. I want the more basic car with non turbo engine. I know th poser is great. But like simplicity. Honda’s new CRV was and is great but now they only offer Turbo and Hybrid. I also like the Radio in the Forrester.
      I am now debating the Sport and the Wilderness.

  • @maximusaugustus6823
    @maximusaugustus6823 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic review! I enjoyed watching.

  • @bobonthis9520
    @bobonthis9520 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Have an Outback wilderness. This is my second Outback , first one had 230,000 mi, never let me down. Subaru FTW :-)

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว

    We get 5-6 feet of snow every winter and we live on a private road.
    When coming off the county road and into our road, we have to put our Outback into Xmode just to get up our road and into our garage.
    We have to engage our Rav and our 4X4 pickup as well.
    Sometimes when we have to go to either Seattle or Spokane in the winter at times the snow is so deep over Blewitt pass, everyone is driving 20-25mph so we put our Outback into Xmode

  • @rileyjones750
    @rileyjones750 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I test drove both cars and went with the forester wilderness. The infotainment and in the outback was annoying to use, small sunroof, and the extra 9 inches of length wasn’t worth it for the minimal increase in cargo capacity.
    I’ve had the forester wilderness loaded going through mountain passes in BC with no issues. It’s not fast at all but it has enough power.

    • @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020
      @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I agree the Forester fine it actually has more space than the outback due to design it has a sufficient amount of power that get the job done granted it's no sports car but it quick enough for most easy to drive because of it's size and gives and exceptionally smooth and just the right amount comfort this coming from someone who use to own a 6cylinder now proudly owns a Forester

    • @rileyjones750
      @rileyjones750 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@jeremyanddanaeferguson6020 bonus that the forester is built in Japan. I think it’ll be the more reliable option based on that and the non-turbo engine.

    • @mdhonze
      @mdhonze 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The Forester Wilderness has that Sport# mode that engages immediate and gives the torque needed to merge or pass. Forester just works for me when I look at the total package.

    • @bigmacdig7201
      @bigmacdig7201 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m looking at getting the forester wilderness and was wondering if you ever drove from van to Kelowna on the coquihalla with it or if you think a long trip like that would be fine to take with the forester. Plan on doing a lot of travelling like that/off roading so any thoughts helps

    • @rileyjones750
      @rileyjones750 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@bigmacdig7201 I drove to Kelowna and Kamloops with 5 people and luggage in the forester and it was fine. I was just under 4000 RPM on the big long hills with a little extra power in reserve. It’s not fast but it’ll do what you need. We averaged around 9 to 10 litres per 100km.
      The outback wilderness would be a lot more fun in the mountains but you’ll use a lot more fuel.

  • @polylight
    @polylight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I went with the Forester in part because I liked the predicable power. I'd rather keep my foot planted and know what I have to work with than the XT engine where the turbo + cvt is all over the place. Been driving "momentum" sports cars for years, so I suppose that helps. The greenhouse and traditional controls put it over the top. Tough decision though. The Outback drives really well and has useful long cargo space.

    • @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020
      @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I agree the power consistent in Forester plus the Forester actually has more space because it's built more like and suv and it has enough power for most drives excellent straight forward dashboard stick to the basics higher seating position I would have someone like review Subarus because he was overly critical

    • @Doc1855
      @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว

      I bought my wife a new Outback last November (2022) with the 2.5 liter naturally aspirated engine as she uses it to commute. We also use it as our road car for its comfortable ride and we need the extra room for our 120# Chocolate Lab.
      The best mpg that we’ve got was only 28-29 mpg.
      I’ll ad a K&N intake and a 3 inch Borla exhaust system. This will increase the mpg, torque and horsepower.
      I’ve had these 2 mods installed on our other vehicles and have noticed the changes listed above.

    • @oscarchi6502
      @oscarchi6502 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh stop with the turbo and cvt all over the place! I must have the unicorn obw, people need to learn how to drive.

    • @oscarchi6502
      @oscarchi6502 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Another Comment Giver I suppose that's possible the way you've explained it. I've never had any such issue. Maybe I'm just used to the throttle response of my STI.

  • @sonidosdeltrono1089
    @sonidosdeltrono1089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great review; good job 👍🏼

  • @PLefevre95
    @PLefevre95 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Practicality wins the say for me. That’s why I chose a Forester☝🏾

  • @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020
    @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like the Forester and have 21 at first I was skeptical but once I drove it fell in love it's practical straight forward has a higher seating position easy to drive , smooth has the right amount power that's consistent and linear. It's not fast but quick enough for most and I have no issues merging on the highway and easy to maneuver and has good steering and brakes

    • @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020
      @jeremyanddanaeferguson6020 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It also roomy and has more space then the outback because designed more like and suv

  • @ME-gr8hz
    @ME-gr8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Researched this car segment for the last 2 months, my findings, - 5th gen forester rated #1 in safety and readability over all others including RAV, trial hawk, honda and bronco. That said, it has been a long road for Subaru from the CVT tranny , oil consumption, head gasket issues of past generation vehicles. At 6'3, CR just announced the Forester is #1 with tall drivers as well, no surprise as the "green house" visibility is very attractive. All the safety dings can be disabled permanently, with the exception of engine on/off at stop. After market solution will solve that as well. So, I will be picking up my Subaru Forester Wilderness / pearl white next week. Comfortable driving on and off road, safety and readability, looks, honest service advisors that I have visited with during this time, all have pushed me this direction. And finally driving my daughters 2017 Forester premium, sold me on being a Subie owner. Suggested maintenance to ensure long life; 30k diff (F/R) service, 40k CVT Transmission service, and oil changes every 4k.
    Compared to the Outback, Off road analysis/videos show the turbo in the Outback gets totally in the way of performance when climbing, as the Forester's new gearing and software changes bring much more to the equation over the turbo, in my opinion. th-cam.com/video/ZF_JtgJ7aKQ/w-d-xo.html
    No rock climbing, but adventuring, all day long...
    HAPPY TRAILS

    • @AlaskaErik
      @AlaskaErik ปีที่แล้ว

      You can disable the auto stop/start. Autostop Eliminator costs $99.99 (even cheaper with discount codes) and allows you to turn auto stop/start on and off at your convenience. It's the only modification I made to my Forester Wilderness and I love it. I'm 6' 2" and I agree the Forester is perfect for taller people.

  • @folkmaster101
    @folkmaster101 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just wondering if you plan on drag racing to get groceries at your neighbourhood store or perhaps doing the Baja race with your new Outback. As a senior I do not plan on doing either. So why do I need all that extra power. Just asking for a friend.

  • @limpunsing2229
    @limpunsing2229 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video review

  • @zestycomps882
    @zestycomps882 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My forester wilderness is on order in BC Canada. Not the prettier one but I went with it because of better mpg, better approach/dep angles, bigger sunroof, less expensive MSRP, better infotainment, better sound system, and a lot less complaints vs. the outback wilderness online from other owners (cracking windshields, slow/non-tactile infotainment, suspension noises, unpredictable turbo boost, bad speakers, plastic cladding is different and fades/discolours quickly). The only thing that would've made the FW perfect is giving it 65 (comes with 60) sidewall size tires like the outback, to suck up bumps and protect the rims a bit. The FW wheels just seem a tab bit small stock eh?

    • @MrSmith-rk4jq
      @MrSmith-rk4jq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      interesting, ive got over 6k miles on my outback wilderness in the last 5 months and cant say suspension noises has ever been something I've noticed.

  • @sneakersonfeet9045
    @sneakersonfeet9045 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This guy really slams the Forester 😂 😂 #subieslow

  • @blackchristiangeek
    @blackchristiangeek ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a first-time viewer, but I must admit that you are one of the more entertaining reviewers I have watched 🙂and, yes, I Have subscribed. I'm in the market for a new car for the first time in almost 12 years and considering the Subaru Outback, compared to Nissan Rouge or the Mazda CX-5. Thanks for the review and God bless,

    • @MsLA-tz4si
      @MsLA-tz4si ปีที่แล้ว

      Which one did you end up getting?

    • @blackchristiangeek
      @blackchristiangeek ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MsLA-tz4si the all electric ⚡ Volkswagen ID.4 and love the car, but frustrated with charger options 😞

    • @RichardLScott
      @RichardLScott ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MsLA-tz4si The Volkswagen ID.4 All Eletric (EV) and 7 weeks later still love it.

  • @hukmai
    @hukmai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm gonna keep saying until subaru does it, put the Crosstrek PHEV hybrid system in the forestor there is enough room that it doesn't eat as much trunk space as the Crosstrek and the ability to run hvac efficiently when car camping not to mention adding a high wattage inverter like all those prius campers

  • @pnwadventurist
    @pnwadventurist ปีที่แล้ว

    Coming from a lifted 22 Tacoma, I'd like one of these, prob moreso the outback for more interior room

  • @EternityRecordsUSA
    @EternityRecordsUSA ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Thank you

  • @thebestphysician
    @thebestphysician ปีที่แล้ว

    How is the maintenance of subarus?

  • @fuzzytb
    @fuzzytb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I enjoyed the review but clearly value different things than Clifford. I ordered the Forester Wilderness a couple of months ago and get it in three weeks. The functionality and basics are far more important than aesthetics and flashy screens. This review reassured me in my decision.

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Researched this car segment for the last 2 months, my findings, - 5th gen forester rated #1 in safety and readability over all others including RAV, trial hawk, honda and bronco. That said, it has been a long road for Subaru from the CVT , oil consumption, head gasket issues of past generation vehicles. At 6'3, CR just announced the Forester is #1 with tall drivers as well, no surprise as the "green house" visibility is very attractive. All the safety dings can be disabled permanently, with the exception of engine on/off at stop. After market solution will solve that as well. So, I will be picking up my Subaru Forester Wilderness / pearl white next week. Comfortable driving on and off road, safety and readability, looks, honest service advisors that I have visited with during this time, all have pushed me this direction. And finally driving my daughters 2017 Forester premium, sold me on being a Subie owner. Suggested maintenance to ensure long life; 30k diff (F/R) service, 40k CVT Transmission service, and oil changes every 4k.
      Compared to the Outback, Off road analysis/videos show the turbo in the Outback gets totally in the way of performance when climbing, as the Forester's new gearing and software changes bring much more to the equation over the turbo, in my opinion. th-cam.com/video/ZF_JtgJ7aKQ/w-d-xo.html
      No rock climbing, but adventuring, all day long...
      HAPPY TRAILS

    • @joebuck4496
      @joebuck4496 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ME-gr8hz yeah I passed on Subaru because of their sketchy record with the transmissions, head gaskets, and oil consumption. I disagree with the video though about looks, I think they are great looking.

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@joebuck4496 Those issues were with past generations, as in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd, as Subaru has ZERO recalls in 2022 through May with their 5th generation vehicles (2019 and newer). they have made great strides to improve all their platforms, and the CR ratings show the results. PEACE

    • @fuzzytb
      @fuzzytb ปีที่แล้ว

      My Forester came in early so I’ve had it 3 months now. I haven’t done anything but commute and haul the kids around, but I love it. My son bought a Crosstrek Sport a month after me. It seems to be infectious as friends and family are starting to look at Subaru models.

  • @dylanblake7807
    @dylanblake7807 ปีที่แล้ว

    This review is why I subscribed! I also just bought an Outback Wilderness and a WRX. (as well as own stock in Subaru). Subarus are like Apple products. They just work!

  • @toutlaw983
    @toutlaw983 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question: Can any of these cars safely fit 3 carseats?

  • @Deetroiter
    @Deetroiter ปีที่แล้ว

    My biggest complaint is I can’t get the Harman kardon on the outback wilderness!

  • @kohort1
    @kohort1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm just wondering what company's AWD rivals Subaru?

  • @djmir4
    @djmir4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wanna see a turbo crosstrek wilderness, that would be neat. I just bought a '23 crosstrek sport as my first subaru. Going to kit it out for adventuring eventually.

    • @GS-jk4cs
      @GS-jk4cs 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Turbo crosstreks would sell too well so Subaru won't build them. And there's no way they'll build a "tall WRX" MT version because that would be way too popular.

    • @djmir4
      @djmir4 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GS-jk4cs less people would buy the outback no doubt

  • @sadlifesock8473
    @sadlifesock8473 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really get tired of people with their turbo hang ups. What is the obsession with getting 0-60 fast? You need to hit the speed limit faster than the other dude? I'm way more interested in how it handles off road. That's why I got a Wilderness.

  • @ijakdo
    @ijakdo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best comparison video of the two Subaru models

  • @hurstchiropracticinc.8098
    @hurstchiropracticinc.8098 ปีที่แล้ว

    what car would you compare to the Outback?

  • @Sirgromulus
    @Sirgromulus ปีที่แล้ว

    I would "consider" the Outback Wilderness over the Forester Wilderness if it had the smaller infotainment system and offered the HK premium sound system. I do find the Forester's higher interior capacity more useful then longer cargo length of the Outback for our uses though.

  • @derekfugate9052
    @derekfugate9052 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Kinda different review here as he mentions these forester wilderness models are not much different than the much older models? These vehicles have driver assist and are very advanced to basically drive themselves on nice painted roads. Also, the forester’s lower gearing allows for 0-60 at just under 8 seconds, which is really not that slow for a non-turbo suv. Thought he could’ve giving a more helpful review, just odd never mentions all the technology these vehicles actually have.

  • @jonlosito2004
    @jonlosito2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the Turbo in the Outback, but I like the system in the Forester more than the Outback. But overall.. I don’t like both of these. Mainly because of the CVT and maybe their laggy Starlink infotainment systems and their “updated” eyesight system. I don’t usually like CVTs that often, but they’re decent in most Subarus, but they suck. My moms Forester had an engine problem, a suspension issue, and a tire pressure issue 2 years ago. And the reason I mentioned the eyesight system because it beeps a lot and it’s kinda annoying in my opinion. The Forester is okay right now.
    Update: My moms Forester is getting the suspension fixed.

  • @seikocitizenwatches
    @seikocitizenwatches ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Subaru is one of the most lovable brands and Subaru is affordable for such capable vehicles especially for most outdoor enthusiasts.

  • @billcalnan5775
    @billcalnan5775 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow I just purchased a forester and looking at the reviews I thought I was at the race track just be glad it you hit a tree at high speed you were driving a Subaru because you will probably be alive to get some pictures

  • @justdafax
    @justdafax 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Worst issue with Subaru is glitchy screen, I had a 2020 forester sport until someone ran me off the road...The only other problem you will have is that the windshield breaks alot..i had two replacements in 1 year. The window repair said they were probably their #1 replacement window and thats all the models..also in rain the eyesight will not pick up the road sometimes..

  • @tapper701
    @tapper701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2022 Outback Wilderness vs. 2022 Forester Wilderness = Win Win as either is a capable people mover/off road vehicle ! Slainte' ! Cheers !

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Falken Wildpeak AT3s are awesome tires for all 4 seasons. They have excellent snow traction.
    We average 4-5 feet of snow every winter. Last winter we got 6 feet of snow and the Wildpeaks were awesome tires

  • @BuyFromNeil-CoreysCars
    @BuyFromNeil-CoreysCars 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We absolutely love our Outback Wilderness!!!

  • @Overitall805
    @Overitall805 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think Subaru could keep going in this direction and if they do it right, they could lead the market and make alot of people happy...XT engines for top models(all Wilderness models) , don't let the Forester be a lesser Outback(keep it fully developed) , rethink the CVT , keep developing serious offroad models etc. It isn't the racing direction like the wrx/sti direction...but it is the Outdoors market.

  • @roberterickson6331
    @roberterickson6331 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I own 2 subarus right now and want the outback wilderness next but I can't stand the full touch screen

  • @Bluegreenred
    @Bluegreenred ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you say Forester Sport is better than Forester Wilderness in your opinion?

  • @anthonyjulson8840
    @anthonyjulson8840 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought a Forester wilderness. Only a couple minor complaints. For example, can the power hatch button on the hatch be on the same side as the outback please???? Like seriously!!!!!!

  • @jonathanpaturalski7361
    @jonathanpaturalski7361 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I have a forester wilderness. I also sold Subarus. The forester wilderness is the best vehicle that Subaru makes hands down.

    • @650tonyd
      @650tonyd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is that?

    • @jonathanpaturalski7361
      @jonathanpaturalski7361 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@650tonyd Better off road gear ratio/ mpg, CVT turbos suck, Forester has better X-mode, better handling at low and high speeds/turning, it’s not a wagon, better visibility/ 4 inches higher in cabin seating, better moon roof, better body styling (in my opinion), lower price, body cladding goes up higher on forester without paying extra, Outback’s head unit clumsily adds digital climate control,

    • @650tonyd
      @650tonyd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jonathanpaturalski7361 but it lacks the power of the turbo. But I agree and am leaning towards the Forester wilderness. Do you think there will be an ascent wilderness in the future?

    • @jonathanpaturalski7361
      @jonathanpaturalski7361 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@650tonyd I am fairly certain there will be a Wilderness Ascent. It will not be released for at least 2-3 years and will probably be part of a larger remodel. The Crosstrek wilderness is the next to be released some time in 2023, none of this is for sure because of supply chain issues.

    • @alphawolfadventures1470
      @alphawolfadventures1470 ปีที่แล้ว

      Outback has the higher towing capacity though correct?

  • @wyattyarnell687
    @wyattyarnell687 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think the only thing they did wrong on the forester is not giving it the same engine as the Outback

  • @cathyling2015
    @cathyling2015 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m looking to getting a new car soon. Always wanted a Subaru for years.
    But everyone, literally everyone I talk to says don’t get it because of the CVT. Expensive to maintain and repair.

  • @Sonyyy871
    @Sonyyy871 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว

    The seats maybe comfortable, but the Gloomy Grey and the Death Coffin Black interior colors became popular in 1990.
    We are sick and tired of those dated colors.
    When we bought my wife her new Outback last year, we purposefully bought an exterior color so that we could have the Warm Ivory leather interior.
    I ordered my 11 Rav 4WD Limited new and purposefully bought the Gold exterior so that I could have the Ivory leather interior.
    We bought our 11 Ford Ranger XLT super cab 4X4 and the only interior color was Gloomy Grey and Coffin Black, so I had it reupholstered in Red and Tan, which matches perfectly with the 2 tone exterior colors

    • @FOZ23
      @FOZ23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cool story

  • @jameszottola9980
    @jameszottola9980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like the forester better I had 7subarus as far back as1979 had4 foresters had a head on collision with my 17 and I’m still alive

  • @fredastaire6156
    @fredastaire6156 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need to get me one of these "Far-esters" that this gentleman speaks of!

  • @bambamyong
    @bambamyong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subaru needs to bring back the turbo for the Forester, an XT or Wilderness

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My wife Loves her Outback and I Love my Forester

  • @kohort1
    @kohort1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder why they took the turbo from the Forester and shifted it to the outback.

  • @cyclonemagic
    @cyclonemagic ปีที่แล้ว

    Outside of the Forester Wilderness trim, the other Forester trims (Premium, Sport, Limited, and Touring) compete with the comparable models from other car brands such as the Toyota RAV 4, and Honda CR-V. The majority of car trims available in the small SUV class of cars are family vehicles and not considered to be speed demons. I just purchased a Forester Limited. I liked it better than the comparable OB trim because of its practicality and size (fits in our garage). I did not care much for the OB infotainment system as was distracting to use while driving compared to using the traditional knobs and buttons in the Forester. It was easier to step into the Forester as opposed to crouching down to enter the OB. The visibility in the Forester was far superior that the OB. My wife stated that the OB visibility was like going to a large-screen movie theater (very good visibility). In comparison, the Forester is like an IMAX theater (excellent visibility).

  • @TheBandit59
    @TheBandit59 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought a 2020 Outback XT turbo; and do like it; I bought my wife a 2021 Forrester Sport, and feel that it is much more smoother to drive , I like it better than my turbo, maybe I’m
    Just getting old , but the Forrester is just smoother all the way around . The XT is much faster , but not as smooth. I wanted to get my wife a new Forrester Wilderness, but was trying to justify the mileage compared to the Sport, my wife consistantly gets 34-35 mpg

  • @billyrock8305
    @billyrock8305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4x4 Topguns # 1.
    Iceman and Mav. Subbie versions.

  • @christopherguzzi1316
    @christopherguzzi1316 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For Loki, due to his special powers, everything that is yellow or gold, he sees as orange.😉😆🤗

  • @PaulHo
    @PaulHo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Love the Outback, but both of these really make a case for Honda to bring back the Element instead of that failure of a Passport.

    • @JamesSymmonds
      @JamesSymmonds 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I miss my Element but after a dabble with a small Mazda, I decided the Forester was the best replacement for the ol' E.

    • @MisterMister5893
      @MisterMister5893 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wasn't the Element the boxy urban vehicle? I don't think it would cut it very far in the wild. And AFAIK, they never offered it in an AWD configuration. There are many alternatives in the market. Namely, the Kia Soul.
      As far as the Outback vs Forester argument, they are both very capable cars. Many have chosen the Forester to be the better off roader due to its approach angle. I bought the Outback because it was a wagon and quite simply, wagons are cool. It's crazy how much it swallows in the back. I don't like the Forester for the simple fact that it is like any other SUVs on the market. During my commute, I will rarely see another wagon and it's usually another Outback or a Mercedes, Volvo and Audi. Very underrated platform and more love needs to be shown or the wagon.

    • @JamesSymmonds
      @JamesSymmonds 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MisterMister5893 It very much did come in AWD and I took mine on forest roads and even the Schafer Trail in Canyonlands National Park. I also drove it across mountain passes that were closed right behind me due to snow. It was pretty capable with the right tires and right driver. 🤷🏼 A newer version with an updated AWD and a bit more clearance would be great.

    • @brianmorton742
      @brianmorton742 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JamesSymmonds Glad to hear you say that about owning an Element. I've had a 2008 SC for the last 13 years and I love it. I have taken it on all sorts of trails, through muddy fields and on icy roads where many a truck was stuck. Mine wasn't even AWD but it never failed to get me to a trail head loaded down with gear. I just ordered the Forester Wilderness hoping it would be a worthy replacement. You're giving me hope!

    • @JamesSymmonds
      @JamesSymmonds ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brianmorton742 Whoa! I had to double check what you were replying to! Weird that I made no reference to the Forester in my comment but..... you know what? I bought a 2022 Forester Sport in February. Which I would put between the Element and Forester Wilderness. Not quite as off road capable stock as the Wildernes (obviously) but more so than the Element which already did decent. If I lived closer to places that would actually put the Wilderness trim to work, I would have totally gone for it. Being in KC, I have 8 hours of open interstate just to get to some place worthy of having a Wilderness or Jeep for actual trail driving. But I still have decent camping and off-road capabilties until I hit my warranty. And hopefully by then, I'll live close enough to some place that I can to a lift, tires, and be close enough to use everything when I want.

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have a 1-2 inch lift giving you more ground clearance

  • @palo1942
    @palo1942 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is a lot of empty space in the forester engine making it super easy to work with. Only that is a win win.

  • @AquaAmazake
    @AquaAmazake 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yeah idk about the engine. I went from a 2021 Chevy equinox to a 2024 sport forestor and I love the acceleration. I got from 0-30 in 2 secs and it pulls hard and fast. It’s not a fast car overall but acceleration is there.

  • @AJLeonardo84
    @AJLeonardo84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would go with the current Forester only if a PHEV was made.

  • @eskrima1
    @eskrima1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I own an out back. The fact that many basic controls like heater/ac , heated seats etc is on the touch screen is an accident waiting to happen. Forester has a much better set up.

  • @wanglee21
    @wanglee21 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a reason why Subaru is till the top loyalty brand for the last 4-5years now.

  • @gevorgnazaryan8720
    @gevorgnazaryan8720 ปีที่แล้ว

    Subaru should partner with garmin and get the overland map on their wilderness models. Having said that, I am torn between the two models

  • @widilbee
    @widilbee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The OB has more length inside to sleep comfortably. Living at elevation i couldn't imagine not having forced induction.

    • @ralphkeith2905
      @ralphkeith2905 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bill, what would you say is the maximum height someone could be in either vehicle to sleep comfortably? The ability to sleep inside is a major consideration for me. Thanks!

    • @widilbee
      @widilbee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ralphkeith2905 i can't speak to the Forester, but with a Luno Air matress there is gobs of room in an Outback. Well over 6' would be totally fine. The Luno website says both vehicles accommodate hoomans up to 6"2, but it's definitely more in the OB

    • @ralphkeith2905
      @ralphkeith2905 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@widilbee thanks!!

    • @leafyo123
      @leafyo123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ralphkeith2905 if you are even asking this question than you will have to count the forester out. Outback on the other hand can comfortably sleep me (5’10) my girlfriend and dog. You can probably be ok at a little over 6ft maybe more if you sleep diagonal.

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Subaru Eyesight works Great except for driving while it’s snowing

  • @grayman618
    @grayman618 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reviewing a slow car and then focusing on it isn't a good reviewer. And by the way a car that goes 0-60 in less than 9 seconds isnt slow, in the 70s and 80s and 90s that would've been a sports car. Get a grip the power is fine for this car.

  • @Dukiedukester
    @Dukiedukester ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does the turbo require premium fuel? These days, should be mentioned.

    • @FOZ23
      @FOZ23 ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn't. Both the Outback Wilderness and Forester Wilderness use 87 octane.

    • @Dukiedukester
      @Dukiedukester ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FOZ23 Even the turbo in the Outback? (forester doesn’t come in a turbo anymore).

    • @Dukiedukester
      @Dukiedukester ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FOZ23 I see at the website that you’re correct. It use to be 89 octane minimum requirement for the turbos.

  • @ngkrazian7502
    @ngkrazian7502 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the coolant control valve? Have they fix that problem like the 2020 outback? So many outbacks from that years is waiting to get the new part to replace the coolant control valve. I called 5 different dealerships and still can’t find one that have the valve, all told me back order and wait time is two months. Can’t drive, could get the car overheats.
    Subaru sucks.

  • @makiss.2597
    @makiss.2597 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was the best analysis on you tube. Thanks

    • @cargurus
      @cargurus  ปีที่แล้ว

      Appreciate that, thank you!

  • @jpshipwash6240
    @jpshipwash6240 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just wondering why you put so much emphasis on power, like the Forrester isn’t worth considering unless you take it to the drag strip.

  • @jeffmelodia2077
    @jeffmelodia2077 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the outback wilderness. Be aware the screen is very buggy and slow. When it goes out, and it does regularly, you lose everything. No radio, ac m gps or safety systems. The dealer experience in Northern California is awful. Buying was easy but the service is atrocious. Overall it’s a good car, just don’t expect good service and know the screen will go out while you drive on occasion.

    • @650tonyd
      @650tonyd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What part of Nor Ca

    • @jeffmelodia2077
      @jeffmelodia2077 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@650tonyd shingle springs

  • @Subie_OffXroad
    @Subie_OffXroad ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the diff limited slip?

  • @The_Hostile_Soldier
    @The_Hostile_Soldier 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also due to the better approach angle, that turbo engine wont get you everywhere, the Forester will get you further off road

  • @gordon3988
    @gordon3988 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both look like good soft roaders; great for a road like you were on and both great in snow. Forester obviously slightly better off road given specs. Both will do more than 90%+ of people will ever need. Have always wanted one or the other but honestly still hear longer term reliability isn’t near what I would expect (eg like Honda or Toyotas). Maybe I’m wrong though. A RAV 4 might be a better fit for me. None of these look good sadly, but that is low on my list!

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Researched this car segment for the last 2 months, my findings, - 5th gen forester rated #1 in safety and readability over all others including RAV, trial hawk, honda and bronco. That said, it has been a long road for Subaru from the CVT , oil consumption, head gasket issues of past generation vehicles. At 6'3, CR just announced the Forester is #1 with tall drivers as well, no surprise as the "green house" visibility is very attractive. All the safety dings can be disabled permanently, with the exception of engine on/off at stop. After market solution will solve that as well. So, I will be picking up my Subaru Forester Wilderness / pearl white next week. Comfortable driving on and off road, safety and readability, looks, honest service advisors that I have visited with during this time, all have pushed me this direction. And finally driving my daughters 2017 Forester premium, sold me on being a Subie owner. Suggested maintenance to ensure long life; 30k diff (F/R) service, 40k CVT Transmission service, and oil changes every 4k.
      Compared to the Outback, Off road analysis/videos show the turbo in the Outback gets totally in the way of performance when climbing, as the Forester's new gearing and software changes bring much more to the equation over the turbo, in my opinion. th-cam.com/video/ZF_JtgJ7aKQ/w-d-xo.html
      No rock climbing, but adventuring, all day long...
      HAPPY TRAILS

    • @650tonyd
      @650tonyd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Check out the rav 4 awd with he TRD package. It a beast for a little suv

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@650tonyd thanks, drove the rav, the handling not close to Subaru, not to mention the off road capacity, used to have a Land Cruiser, the TRD package on the rav, seems very low impact to me.

    • @joebuck4496
      @joebuck4496 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      All of these comments about the Subarus being ugly makes me feel like Jack Black in Shallow Hal. I think the Forester Wilderness looks awesome.

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joebuck4496 getting mine in a few months, if not sooner. :-)

  • @RandyAllen702
    @RandyAllen702 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jam the same tires on the Forester as the Outback and the Forester ground clearance beats it easily. For my money, the Forester wins out off-road. The Forester is made for off-road performance. I own and love my Forester Wilderness. The Forester has a different CVT and a transmission cooler which helps alot off-road.

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Researched this car segment for the last 2 months, my findings, - 5th gen forester rated #1 in safety and readability over all others including RAV, trial hawk, honda and bronco. That said, it has been a long road for Subaru from the CVT , oil consumption, head gasket issues of past generation vehicles. At 6'3, CR just announced the Forester is #1 with tall drivers as well, no surprise as the "green house" visibility is very attractive. All the safety dings can be disabled permanently, with the exception of engine on/off at stop. After market solution will solve that as well. So, I will be picking up my Subaru Forester Wilderness / pearl white next week. Comfortable driving on and off road, safety and readability, looks, honest service advisors that I have visited with during this time, all have pushed me this direction. And finally driving my daughters 2017 Forester premium, sold me on being a Subie owner. Suggested maintenance to ensure long life; 30k diff (F/R) service, 40k CVT Transmission service, and oil changes every 4k.
      Compared to the Outback, Off road analysis/videos show the turbo in the Outback gets totally in the way of performance when climbing, as the Forester's new gearing and software changes bring much more to the equation over the turbo, in my opinion. th-cam.com/video/ZF_JtgJ7aKQ/w-d-xo.html
      No rock climbing, but adventuring, all day long...
      HAPPY TRAILS

    • @RandyAllen702
      @RandyAllen702 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ME-gr8hz - one of the first things I installed was to cancel the engine start/stop. Totally worth the $100 price tag and it was a very simple install. Additionally - I made sure to get setup with the Subaru Factory trailer hitch. Enjoy your Wilderness! I love mine!

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RandyAllen702 THANKS for the heads up, was it the "Autostop Eliminator, that plugs into the module (reverse braking) under the drivers seat? Are you concerned about impacting the vehicle warranty? I am so impressed with what Subaru did with the Forester, and so tired of hearing it only has a 8.5 sec (fastest) time 0-60. The only hit the vehicle takes, and the new gearing deals with it, but some people, focus on the non - issues to make an issue. What color dod you get?

    • @ME-gr8hz
      @ME-gr8hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RandyAllen702 Oh, the car comes with the hitch, got lucky with the white color I got

    • @RandyAllen702
      @RandyAllen702 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ME-gr8hz - I am not concerned about the car and warranty / safety. The system works and works well. All it does is allow you to turn it off and not have it reset every time the car is turned off. - and yes - it is the autostart eliminator.

  • @Czer0001
    @Czer0001 ปีที่แล้ว

    A real pity Subaru just doesn't use the 2.4 litre engine from the BRZ in the Forrester and Outback. Naturaly aspirated, 174kw power (In Australia)
    183kw for the turbo 2.4 litre in Australia - what a joke.

  • @AB-jk7tw
    @AB-jk7tw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great comparison. Love the Forrester if it only had a more powerful engine.

  • @mlhbrx96
    @mlhbrx96 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks are subjective. I think the Forester looks terrific. The Outback looks Kim Kardashian to me (backside hanging out too far). Also, people, Americans especially, are getting spoiled on power. It seems everyone wants a vehicle that can accelerate like a Ferrari these days.

  • @MagnumoftheMountains
    @MagnumoftheMountains ปีที่แล้ว

    This is easily the best Wilderness model review I've seen. I own a 2015 OB so the Wilderness model intrigues me as a potential next vehicle before hopefully Subaru has a compelling all electric offering (the Solterra ain't it for me.) Based on what was said of the Forrester, I think the Outback Wilderness will be the way to go for me. Thank you!

  • @johanlabuschagne377
    @johanlabuschagne377 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I prefer the Forester because it's more basic, nobody needs a full sized iPad on the dashboard, and it's got shorter overhangs

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’d love to buy a Forester Wilderness but it’s painfully slow.
    Even the Outback Wilderness turbo isn’t as quick as my 11 Rav 4WD Limited with a 3.5 V6 with 269 horsepower and my Rav gets better mpg and it has a 5spd automatic geared transmission.
    Please don’t get me wrong, we LOVE our (my wife’s GUTLESS 2.5 naturally aspirated engine), but it too is, well, Gutless.
    I hope Subaru will have a hybrid for the Wilderness trim in the Forester when it’s time to replace our Rav.

  • @NarcyZG1
    @NarcyZG1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    9 inches means you'll either park or not park in New York City.

  • @mitchelljamieson4041
    @mitchelljamieson4041 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have an old 2002 outback.. threw on a home made Steel bash plate. And I do shit like this all the time