Equality, Diversity and Inclusion - NEW VIDEO
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ม.ค. 2016
- Don't miss our 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 • Diversity and Inclusio...
The video starts by showing that discrimination has links with heinous crimes that have been committed against people because they are different. It then goes on to look at the nine protected characteristics which offer legal protection under the 2010 Equality Act. These characteristics are then used to show how people are discriminated against either through direct, indirect or dual discrimination or discrimination through association or perception.
The video then goes on to show that differences are often used to mock, tease, harass and bully.
This is our updated version. Reference to: DDA and dual discrimination removed, added '(no faith) ...or philosophical belief'. On our web version, the typo in the centre of the mind map has been corrected to Characteristics.
Watch all our videos here www.whatyouneedtoknow.co.uk/s...
Subscribe to our channel here / @whatyouneedtoknow
#diversity #inclusion #equality
Have a look at our NEW video Diversity and Inclusion th-cam.com/video/LqP6iU3g2eE/w-d-xo.html
You can see all our videos on our website www.whatyouneedtoknow.co.uk/showreel
Do you have this available without the 'for demonstration only'. I was thinking about using this in my class - I will, of course reference you :-), Teresa
Hi it's on our website www.whatyouneedtoknow.co.uk
Sorry for late reply. Have a look at our website www.whatyouneedtoknow.co.uk for details or to get in touch
Equality of opportunity (good) or outcome (bad)
Diversity in charateristics (good) or group identities (bad)
Inclusion of quality no matter who you are (good) or by percentage (bad)
Hi Thank you for your comment. Have you seen our latest Diversity and Inclusion video? It covers some of the points you make th-cam.com/video/LqP6iU3g2eE/w-d-xo.html
finally someone that knows that men can also be discriminated against
Yes we need to keep everyone in mind.
@@whatyouneedtoknow You need to try MUCH harder than just keeping "men in mind"
As the response above says we need to keep everyone in mind - not sure what you're getting at here. BTW have you seen our other video on Diversity and Inclusion th-cam.com/video/LqP6iU3g2eE/w-d-xo.html it's talking about all the ways we're different.
KSA or DIE.
If you’re a government worker or a veteran that has applied for a government job your qualifications are based upon: KSA = Knowledge, Skills, Ability.
DIE = Diversity, Inclusion, Equity (Equity is not the same as Equality) does nothing to prove an individual’s Knowledge, Skills and Ability to do the job.
If a company feels compelled to add a DIE hiring manager or change their company logo to rainbow colors to pander to the LGBTQ group
or DIE group, it’s perceived as patronizing and thus that company may be suspect or actually guilty of past discriminatory hiring practices.
The bottom line…any Federal, State, public or private company that discriminates against a person’s race, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation, political affiliation, economic status, veteran status or disability is in violation of State and Federal employment laws.
Teach your children well.
What country was this video created in as you refer to gender nor sex as protected characteristic? In the UK it is sex.
Is this the part you're referring to? "Sex or gender is also a protected characteristic and this also applies to any gender reassignment. "
I noted in the diagram that expands on what each of the protected characteristics cover and it refers to gender not sex and then splits into male and female.
I'm not sure what the problem is - could you explain more.
It’s basically just normal sex.
@@LisaHandyRSEetc Male and female refer to the genders/sex of all species. Man and woman specifically refer to the genders/sex of humans.
So what if my belief system does not consider a person who has had a sex reassignment a real man or woman? Both their sex reassignment and my belief system fall under protected categories. Who takes priority?
It's not a case of a priority, but not discriminating against and excluding someone in the workplace. When would this situation occur?
I wonder if the Waldorf schools teach these ideas
These people that come up with these laws are so short-sighted they cannot see the immense conflicts of interest that will generate by protecting all kinds of characteristics that contradict each other. I would sure hope to see whoever made this video not discriminate against a doctor who has a zero experience or isn't even a doctor per say try to operate on him during a open heart surgery. in that kind of situation that's when you really show your colors and what you truly believe in. It's easy to say we believe in diversity and equality, then turn around and try to look for the best option in any field: best doctor or best plumber or best Carpenter or best server at a restaurant so on.
There's nothing wrong with choosing the best doctor etc. Why would there be?
The Equality Act 2010 takes those things into account. There is lawful discrimination where discrimination has to be justified by an employer, for example in the case of a "doctor" or any person trying to perform a serious task with no experience.
Thanks for your comment Annaleisha. We also have a new Diversity and Inclusion video which you might find interesting th-cam.com/video/LqP6iU3g2eE/w-d-xo.html
@@whatyouneedtoknow That's what the comment was meaning.
erwin james milca, kenneth sison, JM alva, danniel lleva mag aral kayong mabuti mga kapatid..
hahahahahahha
What? You wanted a serious comment on TH-cam?
That's up to you. Do you want to be taken seriously?
Fair enough.
c7042 haha what the hell
splendid
Glad you like it Corey
🧇