🚩 Click betterhelp.com/historymarche for 10% off your first month of therapy with our sponsor BetterHelp. 🚩 Join over 4 million people who’ve met with a therapist on BetterHelp and started living a healthier, happier life. 🚩 Agricola is a fairly unknown figure, yet he was one of the most competent Roman commanders of his time, remembered for his decisive campaigns in Britain. Mons Graupius (AD 83/84) was his crowning achievement. The battle broke the army of the Caledonian Confederacy and it seemed that Rome was finally on the brink of conquering the whole of Britain... This was a very fun topic to research and piece together. Capable commanders winning victories in spite of the political intrigue, crisis, and turmoil disrupting their efforts. Roman empire brimming with power. Fun times.
Agricola was like the "2nd Germanicus" and the only man who almost had the complete "Romanization" of Britannia. Imperial politics and rivalries, alongside strategic risk & the drain of resources and manpower for Rome, ultimately won.
plus history didn't look with favour on Rome or Italy it's barely recognisable today and has one of the lowest birth % in the western hemisphere. Soon to be forgotten. 100 years or so.
@@Nozylattenwhen on earth did Wales invade Scotland... Welsh bowmen were pressed into the English army by longshanks after the conquest but they didn't want to be there. In fact they mutinied so much and threatened to go over to Wallace to the point that he never used them in his Scottish invasions again
Feet up on a lazy Saturday afternoon with a cold beer and about to play Rome Total War, so what a nice treat this post is to put me in the mood. This channel is addictive viewing and such a informative insight into battles we could only understand through history books.
Few conflicts in human history have shown better the absolutely devastating power of heavy infantry. The Roman equipment, tactical drill and professional discipline made them a near unstoppable force, regardless of the number of the enemy.
The talk about "Ordivices" and "Silures" makes me feel like I'm going through the various periods of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic Eras. I'm half expecting to hear about the Romans fighting the Carboniferous, Jurassic and Cretaceous tribes next...
Those periods were in fact named after these tribes, or more specifically the geological strata that were first found in Wales in the old lands of these tribes. See also: Cambrian period
Have been anticipating this one . Not much coverage anywhere but you did it. Thank you much!!!
7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12
This battle is an example of the effectiveness of the Roman war machine, to the point that they were able to defeat their enemies only using their auxiliaries (if Agricola had sent his veterans before, it would have been a greater massacre, but that was not the objective that he was pursuing, nor was it worth risking his legions).
History Marche is my favorite history channel! This channel has just as good info as Kings &Generals but HistoryMarche has the edge because of the narrarator. His voice has a haunting tone to it which makes it more immersive!
It’s interesting by itself that Tacitus would write those words about his own country through the mouth of an imagined enemy chief. He obviously believed some of it himself.
A lot of the writers and historians of that era were senators or related to them, plenty of them held the Republic in a extremely high regard even to the point of having an idealized view of it which they compared negatively with their then-current goverment, in particular the figure of the Emperor, which is fair considering figures like Tiberius, Caligula, Nero and Domitian, but not all were bold enough to express it directly, Calgacus' words here easily could be Tacitus' own towards the system itself or the head of state. Historians with more direct criticisms against the Princeps often were forced to open their veins and their works would be destroyed so is natural to find this sort of indirect approach towards the matter from those with better sense of self-preservation.
Imagined enemy? The 'speech' was certainly written by Tacitus but the enemy was real enough. Galgach, latinised to Calgacus was the war leader (probably not political head) of the Caledonii, one of the northern 'Pictish' tribes. The Brythonic ('Pict' was a Roman nickname) tribes facing the Roman invaders had formed an alliance, possibly even a confederation, to oust the Romans and Galgach was the elected war leader of that alliance. According to Tacitus, despite overwhelming odds, the might of Rome vanquished the barbarian enemy - strange that the Romans didn't stick around however!
Centuries later, the descendants of the caledonians, the picts would keep harassing and tormenting roman britain, the constant pictish and later irish raids would cause the britons to hire the angles and the saxons as mercenaries to fight off the other celts, but instead of going away they'd stay. The legendary king Arthur and other briton kings would stall their invasion for a few decades, but not that long after, britain would fall, and the anglo-saxons would rise in it's place.
Re: Site of Battle of Mons Graupius. I am about to publish online my translation of the Pictish language (in about 8 weeks time) which graphemics proves, unquestionably, to be an isolating creole language (advanced pidgin) that uses the Old Irish lexicon as the lexifier. Included in this work is the translation of Bennachie, one of the contender sites of the battle, at the foot of which hill is a Roman fort. Bennachie supposedly means, in Gaelic, "Hill of the Breast" from the shape. However, the Gaelic word for "breast" is 'chiche', and not 'chie' as it's been written since the 14th. century. There is an Old Irish word, 'chīe', (ref: eDIL), the intransitive form of the verb 'ciid' meaning "cries, weeps, laments, lamenting." Benn na chie = Hill of Lamentation. This ties in perfectly with Tacitus' description of the battle in which he describes the Caledonian tribes weeping and lamenting. Co-incidence? I have also got startling new linguistic evidence for the Battle of Dunnichen plus a complete translation of the ogham inscriptions and wholesale revision of Pictish place-names, all in keeping with the Five Components of Language. The Pictish language is dated with reference to Tacitus to the 1st. century A.D. Get ready... History is about to be changed.
When I lived just near Bennachie (Sauchen, inverurie) the locals attributed the battle to being there as did the local tourist board, nobody actually said why! so thanks, I did like the fact Calgacus is likely to be the first Scottish chap actually named in written history
I generally don't skip the sponsored segments of videos to show support, but I always skip BetterHelp. I won't lecture so ill just say this, BetterHelp is the only sponsor I skip every time no matter what channel; I would love to support otherwise.
The Highland people put up a good fight but nothing they had could match the arms and armour of the Romans. Later on they would make life untenable for the Roman, through hit-and-run attacks and raiding, forcing them to leave.
@@ninjay2k317 Someone makes a comment and you equate the person with being scottish or of any political affiliation? Whats wrong with you? Stop projecting ur insecurities immigrant
Another wonderful historical coverage video shared by an amazing ( history Marche) channel. Video about conflict between chaladonian tribes warrior's and Roman legions at 74 AD on Britain 🇬🇧 island ..thank you for sharing
"They create desolation and call it peace" words that echo down the ages. Tacitus could get away with a lot by putting words into the speeches of Rome's enemies.
If a people does not understand that streets, peace and bathrooms, cleanliness and justice in written form, Roman law are progress, they deserve to continue grazing the grass with b.....t. Not recognizing civilization is worse than being uncivilized and in any case Rome was often lenient, leaving ancient religions to the conquered peoples without imposing its own. In fact, I'm amazed that they went there and did nothing in those useless and desolate lands, only cold, damp meadows, not even the trees want to grow there. One of the most useless places on earth....Anyway there are people who don't understand progress and for example still live under sharia and prefer to graze goats than let their children and women study...... they prefer to remain primitive ( Afghanistan maybe? ). In the Ages we ear the glory of Rome and the monument at civilization , water street etc. etc.
@NourishyourBeauty2027 lmao and would you say these same things to the African peoples ? I bet not right little modernist. Also Roman's were not feminists so don't put that in their mouths At the end of the day people (especially historically who were saner) wished to be ruled and controlled by themselves or people they share commonality with
One does not simply walk into Mon.....unless it's low tide. .but holy crap swimming over the menai straights even if its at baumeris is an achievement in military history that's not really talked about in north Wales! It's still as wide if not wider than the Hydaspes and the widest is point 3km! but I reckon it would be a bit silly to swim there, ...I love these vids, makes me realise how much history is on my doorstep!!!
Our Highlands have a strange feeling to them. A lot of war, death and battle has taken place. Not just this battle but clan warfare. The blood is in our soil and you can almost smell it when it rains.
"The legions came, hard hawkeyed men, war-wise in march and fray But we rushed like a whirlwind upon their ranks, and swept their lines away Army and consul we overthrew, staining the trampled loam Horror and fear like a lifted spear lay hard on the walls of Rome"
There's no evidence to suggest scythed chariots were ever used in Britain. This is how chariots were used: "In chariot fighting the Britons begin by driving all over the field hurling javelins, and generally the terror inspired by the horses and the noise of the wheels are sufficient to throw their opponents' ranks into disorder. Then, after making their way between the squadrons of their own cavalry, they jump down from the chariot and engage on foot. In the meantime their charioteers retire a short distance from the battle and place the chariots in such a position that their masters, if hard pressed by numbers, have an easy means of retreat to their own lines. Thus they combine the mobility of cavalry with the staying power of infantry; and by daily training and practice they attain such proficiency that even on a steep incline they are able to control the horses at full gallop, and to check and turn them in a moment. They can run along the chariot pole, stand on the yoke, and get back into the chariot as quick as lightning" (Gallic War, IV.33)
I'd be careful doing sponsorship ads for BetterHelp. They had a history of selling custom medical information to 3rd party advertisers as well as having terrible customer service and some of their "therapists" had no actual licenses. Something a therapy service definitely shouldn't be having issues with.
I found Agricola's tactics interesting. Holding back his best guys like that, it makes me think he was very wary of another force suddenly showing up. Or just a strong awareness that he was at the very end of his logistical tether and couldn't afford a decisive loss, so he'd only risk auxiliaries.
Not even necessarily another force; I'd imagine he was wary of elements of the enemy force lying in wait on the flanks, waiting for him to commit his full force. Considering that would seem to have been a pretty common tactic in medieval and prior eras, wouldn't surprise me if that concern was on his mind and made him a bit more cautious.
Many indecisive, or even losing, battles, had been decided by the timely use of even small reinforces. Furthermore, by employing all of his forces at first, Agricola would have had a river on his back, that was a particularly dangerous situation (think of the Battle of the Trebia, or that of the Milvian Bridge).
@@neutronalchemist3241 You mention small groups of reinforcements... I am reminded of the battle of Zama, where it all hung into the balance until the Roman cavalry reappeared (after chasing off the Carthaginian cav) behind the Carthaginian infantry and attacked them from behind.
@@hoi-polloi1863 Think also to the same battle of the Trebia, where Hannibal prepared a small detachment to appear at the right time (and surely Agricola knew of that instance), or the battle of Marignano, the "battle of the giants", where the balance of a two-days battle had been finally broken by the timely arrival of a force of 400 light cavalrymen.
As to battlefield orations... the Romans were actually really good at this. They deliberately chopped up their speeches into small, "punchy" segments which would be repeated by officers to reach all the ranks. It was a sequence: deliver 2-3 good sentences; wait for officers to retransmit; move on to the next piece.
I think any speeches from a head commander to large bodies of troops without amplification would be just 1 to 3 words. The further down the rank of command, the speeches might progressively add more words haha.
I’ve always shaken my head when empires kept expanding territory without stopping to build fortifications and infrastructure. A great way to lose it and get destroyed or need to keep coming back to pacify the lands.
A Gwynedd man once told me that the legions couldn't face the terrifying sight of the Welsh waiting for them on the other side of the Menai Strait. So they were ordered to wade across the strait backwards. And this freaked out the Celts.
@@00Andreas00 true. Many Roman historians like Tacitus had issues with emperors like Domitian for their autocratic & tyrannical rules. The senate during that time still had problems with the emperors shortly after the birth of the Roman Empire, and they tried to change things after Tiberius
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
🚩 Click betterhelp.com/historymarche for 10% off your first month of therapy with our sponsor BetterHelp.
🚩 Join over 4 million people who’ve met with a therapist on BetterHelp and started living a healthier, happier life.
🚩 Agricola is a fairly unknown figure, yet he was one of the most competent Roman commanders of his time, remembered for his decisive campaigns in Britain. Mons Graupius (AD 83/84) was his crowning achievement. The battle broke the army of the Caledonian Confederacy and it seemed that Rome was finally on the brink of conquering the whole of Britain...
This was a very fun topic to research and piece together. Capable commanders winning victories in spite of the political intrigue, crisis, and turmoil disrupting their efforts. Roman empire brimming with power. Fun times.
Amazing work! Love your content 😊😊😊❤❤❤
I'm enjoying this video but please do more on the US Civil War. The epic battle between Grant and Lee in the Overland Campaign is a must
STOP ADVERTISING THE BETTERHELP SCAM
THERE'S NO REASON NOT TO HEED YOUR SUBSCRIBERS' WARNINGS!!!!
finally more real roman (as opposed to fake eastern romans) content!
@@Hello-ig1px stop roleplaying on TH-cam comment sections
I should admit that your content is addictive
I will die but you will never make Hannibal part 20 and more.
Humanity will colonize mars before another hannibal video is uploaded.
Hannibal will come just be patient
Haniball dude....
maybe because of Hannibal's tragic end?
Thought this was part 20 🤦🏻♂️
History marche always gives us brilliant documentries. Love from Sri Lanka. ❤
Agricola was like the "2nd Germanicus" and the only man who almost had the complete "Romanization" of Britannia. Imperial politics and rivalries, alongside strategic risk & the drain of resources and manpower for Rome, ultimately won.
Yes,and also other invasions from dacia and germany
didn't win, We still speak gallic in scotland! no one could stop us =) not Even England and wales at the same time.
plus history didn't look with favour on Rome or Italy it's barely recognisable today and has one of the lowest birth % in the western hemisphere. Soon to be forgotten. 100 years or so.
@@Nozylattenwhen on earth did Wales invade Scotland... Welsh bowmen were pressed into the English army by longshanks after the conquest but they didn't want to be there. In fact they mutinied so much and threatened to go over to Wallace to the point that he never used them in his Scottish invasions again
@@alessandrogini5283 Those invasions were very much later.
Feet up on a lazy Saturday afternoon with a cold beer and about to play Rome Total War, so what a nice treat this post is to put me in the mood. This channel is addictive viewing and such a informative insight into battles we could only understand through history books.
Original Rome or 2?
@@riverraven7359 " 2 ".. Iceni Tribe will conquer the world tonight...lol
Sounds like paradise
Have fun man! I like to hear that. There are not many better things than some wine and Rome 2.
By Mars and Minerva Rome will conquer!
Few conflicts in human history have shown better the absolutely devastating power of heavy infantry. The Roman equipment, tactical drill and professional discipline made them a near unstoppable force, regardless of the number of the enemy.
Ur voice is soo mighty, I could spend the rest of my life just you narrating me.
Its refreshing to hear of a experienced general who knew how to use his forces efficient and read the enemy.
The talk about "Ordivices" and "Silures" makes me feel like I'm going through the various periods of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic Eras. I'm half expecting to hear about the Romans fighting the Carboniferous, Jurassic and Cretaceous tribes next...
Those periods were in fact named after these tribes, or more specifically the geological strata that were first found in Wales in the old lands of these tribes. See also: Cambrian period
I thought the Romans handily defeated the Tyrantosorus Rexus after surviving a fierce charge from the Triceratopus cavalry.
😂😂😂😂@@eelchiong6709
ITS TIME FOR A NEW VIDEOOO, and its about Rome, My favorite! Thanks HostoryMarche.
Have been anticipating this one . Not much coverage anywhere but you did it.
Thank you much!!!
This battle is an example of the effectiveness of the Roman war machine, to the point that they were able to defeat their enemies only using their auxiliaries (if Agricola had sent his veterans before, it would have been a greater massacre, but that was not the objective that he was pursuing, nor was it worth risking his legions).
History Marche is my favorite history channel! This channel has just as good info as Kings &Generals but HistoryMarche has the edge because of the narrarator. His voice has a haunting tone to it which makes it more immersive!
Duuuuude exactly this guy just makes everything sound so epic
And because HistoryMarche also posts videos that premier on TH-cam publicly that premier on Patreon. K&G doesn't do that. Cheers from Tennessee
@@Hillbilly001 Yeah, if you want good content by K&G, you have to be a channel member or wait a year or so until they make a series free to watch...
The one from epic history is also good. They make these docs so intense
@@AutonomousUltraInstinct69 Really? And why would you say that?
Great job as always. I hope you will support the Roman campaign against Parthia, especially the battle of Carrhae
It’s interesting by itself that Tacitus would write those words about his own country through the mouth of an imagined enemy chief. He obviously believed some of it himself.
A lot of the writers and historians of that era were senators or related to them, plenty of them held the Republic in a extremely high regard even to the point of having an idealized view of it which they compared negatively with their then-current goverment, in particular the figure of the Emperor, which is fair considering figures like Tiberius, Caligula, Nero and Domitian, but not all were bold enough to express it directly, Calgacus' words here easily could be Tacitus' own towards the system itself or the head of state. Historians with more direct criticisms against the Princeps often were forced to open their veins and their works would be destroyed so is natural to find this sort of indirect approach towards the matter from those with better sense of self-preservation.
Imagined enemy? The 'speech' was certainly written by Tacitus but the enemy was real enough. Galgach, latinised to Calgacus was the war leader (probably not political head) of the Caledonii, one of the northern 'Pictish' tribes. The Brythonic ('Pict' was a Roman nickname) tribes facing the Roman invaders had formed an alliance, possibly even a confederation, to oust the Romans and Galgach was the elected war leader of that alliance.
According to Tacitus, despite overwhelming odds, the might of Rome vanquished the barbarian enemy - strange that the Romans didn't stick around however!
Thanks a bunch for sharing this with us Big Dog!
No one has ever conquered all of Scotland.
@@julianshepherd2038 except the Picts…
Centuries later, the descendants of the caledonians, the picts would keep harassing and tormenting roman britain, the constant pictish and later irish raids would cause the britons to hire the angles and the saxons as mercenaries to fight off the other celts, but instead of going away they'd stay. The legendary king Arthur and other briton kings would stall their invasion for a few decades, but not that long after, britain would fall, and the anglo-saxons would rise in it's place.
Very interesting period
Romano-Britons* . . .
Except Wales or? I think the Saxons never conquered Wales and their culture remain celtish.
@@timiturret148I mean to be honest, celtic culture doesn‘t include Christianity though, does it?
Without the the Roman invasion we wouldn't have Wimbledon and Ascot
Re: Site of Battle of Mons Graupius. I am about to publish online my translation of the Pictish language (in about 8 weeks time) which graphemics proves, unquestionably, to be an isolating creole language (advanced pidgin) that uses the Old Irish lexicon as the lexifier. Included in this work is the translation of Bennachie, one of the contender sites of the battle, at the foot of which hill is a Roman fort. Bennachie supposedly means, in Gaelic, "Hill of the Breast" from the shape. However, the Gaelic word for "breast" is 'chiche', and not 'chie' as it's been written since the 14th. century. There is an Old Irish word, 'chīe', (ref: eDIL), the intransitive form of the verb 'ciid' meaning "cries, weeps, laments, lamenting." Benn na chie = Hill of Lamentation. This ties in perfectly with Tacitus' description of the battle in which he describes the Caledonian tribes weeping and lamenting. Co-incidence? I have also got startling new linguistic evidence for the Battle of Dunnichen plus a complete translation of the ogham inscriptions and wholesale revision of Pictish place-names, all in keeping with the Five Components of Language. The Pictish language is dated with reference to Tacitus to the 1st. century A.D. Get ready... History is about to be changed.
Very funny.
When I lived just near Bennachie (Sauchen, inverurie) the locals attributed the battle to being there as did the local tourist board, nobody actually said why! so thanks, I did like the fact Calgacus is likely to be the first Scottish chap actually named in written history
I enjoy the way you conduct your presentation and the animations are very nice
Thank you so much 😀
This should be on the history channel on tv! The edits voice acting and well spoken gentlemen it’s all so perfect! Thanks for the upload!
Forget the History Channel, it's dead and has been a long time. It's not coming back.
This is brilliant. Contributions like this make TH-cam watchworthy.
The narrators voice makes these even more enthrawling.
I generally don't skip the sponsored segments of videos to show support, but I always skip BetterHelp. I won't lecture so ill just say this, BetterHelp is the only sponsor I skip every time no matter what channel; I would love to support otherwise.
The Highland people put up a good fight but nothing they had could match the arms and armour of the Romans. Later on they would make life untenable for the Roman, through hit-and-run attacks and raiding, forcing them to leave.
They weren’t the reason they were forced to leave.
Forcing them to leave😂
@@ninjay2k317 Someone makes a comment and you equate the person with being scottish or of any political affiliation? Whats wrong with you? Stop projecting ur insecurities immigrant
The romans left because there was nothing to stay for. There were no riches, good farmlands, nothing.
@@ninjay2k317 Your pfp and thinking someones SNP, as if its an issue 1+1=2
Your romam videos are awesome! Historymarche is the BEST source of documentaries! Your work is top notch! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Another great video as always HM!
Another wonderful historical coverage video shared by an amazing ( history Marche) channel. Video about conflict between chaladonian tribes warrior's and Roman legions at 74 AD on Britain 🇬🇧 island ..thank you for sharing
I have read that Agricola thought Ireland could be conquered by one legion. Seems unlikely, given how the Irish defended themselves in later times.
Romans were famously arrogant when it came to fighting because they conquered the entire Mediterranean.
The Irish stopped the Norman's.
@@patrickporter1864 And the Vikings.
@@patrickporter1864 When? The Normans conquered Ireland quite easily, without even committing a major force.
thx for your work guys, amazing video
Excellent description of a battle I did not know. You explained it perfectly
Toujours la même qualité, vos vidéos sont passionnantes et instructives. Merci.
Favorite Channel...Love from Sri Lanka❤
Ah another masterpiece, well done...
Excellent post, thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it
Your channel is FANTASTIC! Down vote for the sponsor thou.
My account works again! Loved the video! You're amazing 😊😊😊❤❤❤❤
"They create desolation and call it peace" words that echo down the ages. Tacitus could get away with a lot by putting words into the speeches of Rome's enemies.
If a people does not understand that streets, peace and bathrooms, cleanliness and justice in written form, Roman law are progress, they deserve to continue grazing the grass with b.....t. Not recognizing civilization is worse than being uncivilized and in any case Rome was often lenient, leaving ancient religions to the conquered peoples without imposing its own. In fact, I'm amazed that they went there and did nothing in those useless and desolate lands, only cold, damp meadows, not even the trees want to grow there.
One of the most useless places on earth....Anyway there are people who don't understand progress and for example still live under sharia and prefer to graze goats than let their children and women study...... they prefer to remain primitive ( Afghanistan maybe? ). In the Ages we ear the glory of Rome and the monument at civilization , water street etc. etc.
@NourishyourBeauty2027 lmao and would you say these same things to the African peoples ? I bet not right little modernist. Also Roman's were not feminists so don't put that in their mouths
At the end of the day people (especially historically who were saner) wished to be ruled and controlled by themselves or people they share commonality with
This channel always wins the Battle of Entertainment by a wise strategy called : 'Making Masterpieces'.
Love your work (Daniel here)
I never Imagined that i will glad to see some red and blue square box fighting make me exciting
Excellent work, it’s informative and entertaining.
I love your intros! The build up gets you soo hyped to watch the battle with squares!
Better help is a scam! DO NOT use that "service".
Obviously
Duhhh it’s an ad you never go for whatever that ad is it’s an ad and ads are aids
Always written and narrated exactly as it should be told.
Man these graphical representations just keep making me happier and happier. Great work as always. I feel like I don't say it enough.
Much appreciated!
Thank you, once again.
One does not simply walk into Mon.....unless it's low tide.
.but holy crap swimming over the menai straights even if its at baumeris is an achievement in military history that's not really talked about in north Wales! It's still as wide if not wider than the Hydaspes and the widest is point 3km! but I reckon it would be a bit silly to swim there, ...I love these vids, makes me realise how much history is on my doorstep!!!
Thank you for your efforts!
Good. Concentrated and visually understandable information, professionalism detected. Thank you!
4:20 always have to appreciate a Monty Python reference!
They snuck that little reference into the video so well
I’m sorry I’ve watched your content for years but I just realized I wasn’t subscribed, that has been remedied.
Love the Life of Brian reference
Thanks. Love the research and content.
Our Highlands have a strange feeling to them. A lot of war, death and battle has taken place. Not just this battle but clan warfare. The blood is in our soil and you can almost smell it when it rains.
Another awesome Video, Thank You for doing this! 😃
Thanks for the video
"The legions came, hard hawkeyed men, war-wise in march and fray
But we rushed like a whirlwind upon their ranks, and swept their lines away
Army and consul we overthrew, staining the trampled loam
Horror and fear like a lifted spear lay hard on the walls of Rome"
Thanks for more !! History
“I did great. My arch says so!”:… classic… love the pop ups.
There's no evidence to suggest scythed chariots were ever used in Britain. This is how chariots were used:
"In chariot fighting the Britons begin by driving all over the field hurling javelins, and generally the terror inspired by the horses and the noise of the wheels are sufficient to throw their opponents' ranks into disorder. Then, after making their way between the squadrons of their own cavalry, they jump down from the chariot and engage on foot. In the meantime their charioteers retire a short distance from the battle and place the chariots in such a position that their masters, if hard pressed by numbers, have an easy means of retreat to their own lines. Thus they combine the mobility of cavalry with the staying power of infantry; and by daily training and practice they attain such proficiency that even on a steep incline they are able to control the horses at full gallop, and to check and turn them in a moment. They can run along the chariot pole, stand on the yoke, and get back into the chariot as quick as lightning" (Gallic War, IV.33)
Am I the only one cheering for the Scottish even though I know the Romans won?
These were not Scots.
Scots come from Ireland. These were their predecessors.
They were the same people , just a change of name
Their pics
Thanks a lot
I'd be careful doing sponsorship ads for BetterHelp. They had a history of selling custom medical information to 3rd party advertisers as well as having terrible customer service and some of their "therapists" had no actual licenses. Something a therapy service definitely shouldn't be having issues with.
Solid work, as always
I found Agricola's tactics interesting. Holding back his best guys like that, it makes me think he was very wary of another force suddenly showing up. Or just a strong awareness that he was at the very end of his logistical tether and couldn't afford a decisive loss, so he'd only risk auxiliaries.
Interesting point about suspecting a possible second army. That hadn't occurred to me, despite it being an obvious thing to worry about.
Not even necessarily another force; I'd imagine he was wary of elements of the enemy force lying in wait on the flanks, waiting for him to commit his full force. Considering that would seem to have been a pretty common tactic in medieval and prior eras, wouldn't surprise me if that concern was on his mind and made him a bit more cautious.
Many indecisive, or even losing, battles, had been decided by the timely use of even small reinforces. Furthermore, by employing all of his forces at first, Agricola would have had a river on his back, that was a particularly dangerous situation (think of the Battle of the Trebia, or that of the Milvian Bridge).
@@neutronalchemist3241 You mention small groups of reinforcements... I am reminded of the battle of Zama, where it all hung into the balance until the Roman cavalry reappeared (after chasing off the Carthaginian cav) behind the Carthaginian infantry and attacked them from behind.
@@hoi-polloi1863 Think also to the same battle of the Trebia, where Hannibal prepared a small detachment to appear at the right time (and surely Agricola knew of that instance), or the battle of Marignano, the "battle of the giants", where the balance of a two-days battle had been finally broken by the timely arrival of a force of 400 light cavalrymen.
Bennachie = Be-na-hee
I'm honestly impressed at how close you were to getting that right.
Thanks for a fascinating look of one of the more interesting campaigns in Brittania!🔥⚔👏
I love all the literary references!
Single best channel on TH-cam
Very informational and entertaining❤❤❤
Note , caesar calculated logistics were not ready to push into britain, he made a sound jugdement
I've always loved Agricola since playing Imperivm III.
Thank you
Thanks🎉
Thank you for sharing
Great video. Congrats!
As to battlefield orations... the Romans were actually really good at this. They deliberately chopped up their speeches into small, "punchy" segments which would be repeated by officers to reach all the ranks. It was a sequence: deliver 2-3 good sentences; wait for officers to retransmit; move on to the next piece.
I think any speeches from a head commander to large bodies of troops without amplification would be just 1 to 3 words. The further down the rank of command, the speeches might progressively add more words haha.
Lol, interesting way to look at it.
Awesome as always
Interesting as per usual from this channel.
Love the genius of the mid-era roman generals.
I’ve always shaken my head when empires kept expanding territory without stopping to build fortifications and infrastructure. A great way to lose it and get destroyed or need to keep coming back to pacify the lands.
Nice Video. Where did you get the voice over from? Its great
In the description
Thats so interesting that Tacitus wrote out a speech for Calgacus, fictitious or not, that gave a fair counterperspective to the Pax Romana.
We offer up this most precious sacrifice to the almighty algorithm.
It's amazing, Romes' commitment in these far flung areas. Even much later, as stated, Septimius would launch a basic genocide in Caledonia.
This is awesome 👏
Can you do the battle of velde in 1330 please. And also incredible the video👍.
A Gwynedd man once told me that the legions couldn't face the terrifying sight of the Welsh waiting for them on the other side of the Menai Strait. So they were ordered to wade across the strait backwards. And this freaked out the Celts.
It would be very helpful to have a scale on maps... Hard to get a sense of the size of battlefields
Thanks from Brazil and for. Subs in portuguese. 😊
Welcome!!
The Farthest Roman Drive of Conquest of the North of Scotland known as Caledonia...
Thanks for leaving note for a good amount of time for us slow readers. 😅
Hey! Love your content! (My account got troubles again, gonna comment as soon as i get it back)
Great video
The Romans are truly outstanding
It’s possible that this battle never even happened.
@@00Andreas00 true. Many Roman historians like Tacitus had issues with emperors like Domitian for their autocratic & tyrannical rules. The senate during that time still had problems with the emperors shortly after the birth of the Roman Empire, and they tried to change things after Tiberius
Great job
Great stuff.
"SCOTLAND FOREVER!"