Was the Fatwa of Talibaan to Destroy the Bamiyan Buddha Statue Islaamic? - Dr Zakir Naik
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2020
- Was the Fatwa of Talibaan to Destroy the Bamiyan Buddha Statue Islaamic? - Dr Zakir Naik
TJIPQA-11
Questioner: Hello my name is B. Deepak. I’m a chattered accountant. Id like to ask you a question Sir regarding Taliban regime issued a fatwa for the destruction of Bahmian Buddhas turning it as unislamic. I would like to know whether it is really un Islamic and if it is one of the footsteps of which the Satan has laid and the Muslims should be aware of.
Dr. Zakir Naik: Brother has asked a question the same question was asked to me in Surat when I was giving a lecture in Surat just a couple of days after this issue It was very hot in the Owen Talibans were at were destroying at that time the statue of Buddha Bahmian. The brother asked a question that is it Islamic etc the same question was asked by a non Muslims to me in Surat that is it right or is it wrong and that time yet there were conflicting views whether they were destroying or not so again I said at that time that I don’t know whether they destroyed or not but today we know there are confirmed news that they have destroyed it whether right or wrong. What I can say...what I can say that I being a student of comparative religion whether right or wrong ill tell afterwards what I can tell that surely the Talibans if they destroyed the statue of Buddha what they were doing is actually they were educating the Buddhists. I’m a student of comparative religion I’ve read the Buddhist scriptures iv read Dhammapad I’ve read their scriptures, no where in any of the Buddhist scriptures did Buddha ever say that make a statue of myself...Buddha never said that the Buddhist should do idol worship. It is a later innovation what I could say as a student of comparative religion whether right or wrong we will come afterwards…what they were doing is surely they were educating the Buddhists and in none of the Buddhists scriptures it is mentioned that they should make the statue. Coming to the question and this question was asked to me even by the press even in Mangalore that
Just because Islam feels idol worship is not allowed there are other religions there is even Christianity if you read the Old Testament in the Book of Deuteronomy ch. no 5 verse no. 7 and 9 as well as the book of Exodus ch. no. 20 verse no. 3-5 it says
“Thou shall have no other image besides me, thou shall not make any graven images of me of any likeness of anything in the heavens above in the earth beneath on the water above the earth, Thou shall not bow to them nor serve them for I thy god thy lord is a jealous god.”
So even according to Christianity according to Judaism making images of anyone who says is god is prohibited, same it is prohibited in Islam.
So when I gave this reply that they were educating the Buddhists so what they said that but didn’t these Talibans didn’t they cause grief to millions of Buddhists I said yes, so does Islam allow anyone to cause grief to millions of human beings? I asked the journalist a question that what if suppose the Indian government catches a hall of drugs….Cocaine ….Brown sugar worth 10 Crore rupees, worth about 2 million dollars they catch a hall…drugs, what will the Indian government do? So the journalist told me that the Indian government will burn the drugs...I said good ….I said do you know for millions of human being in the world drugs is god for them, so will you agree with the Indian government or go against the Government that their destroying the god of millions ...
#Fatwa #Talibaan #Destroy #Bamiyan #Buddha #Statue #Islaamic #Zakir #Naik #Zakirnaik #Drzakirnaik #Fariq #Naik #FariqNaik #FariqZakirNaik #Dr #Drzakirchannel #Allah #Allaah #God #Muslim #Islam #Islaam #Comparative #Religion #ComparativeReligion #Atheism #Atheist #Christianity #Christian #Hinduism #Hindu #Buddhism #Buddhist #Judaism #Jew #Sikhism #Sikh #Jainism #Jain #Lecture #Question #Answer #QuestionsandAnswer #Logic #Reason #Science #Misconception #Misunderstanding #PeaceTV #Dawah #Muhammad #Mohammed #Hadeeth #Hadith #Saheeh #Sahih #Man #Woman #Human #Humanity #Problem #Solution #Rights #Media #War #Peace #Similarities #Debate #Lecture #Quran #Quraan #AlQuran #AlQuraan #Bible #Veda #Gita #Geeta #Baghwat #Upanishad #Purana #Terrorism #Terrorist #Universal #Brotherhood #Word #Purpose #Life #Jihad #Jihaad #Jesus #Christ #Jesuschrist #Church #Mosque #Masjid #Perspective #Ask #AskDrZakir #Seeking #Knowledge #Education #NonMuslim #Fundamentalist #Fundamentalism #Symposium #Dialogue #Salaah #Salah #Shariah #Scripture #Ahmed #Deedat #AhmedDeedat #Daee #Missionary #Concept #West #Family #Global #Ramadhaan #Ramadan #Tauheed #Tawheed #Monotheism #Zakaat #Zakat #Zakah #Hajj #Saum #Fasting #Makkah #Mecca #Madinah #India #Malaysia #Ummah #Unity #Importance #Date #Isamophobia #Understand #Deen #Fardh #Fard #Haraam #Haram #Sunnah #Mustahab #Waajib #Wajib #Compulsory #Prohibited #Encouraged #Permissible #Permitted #Prohibited #Sin #Sinful #Heaven #Hell #Hellfire #Jannah #Jahannum #Paradise
That statue was historically cherished around the world and the destruction caused grief not just for Buddhists but for people around the world and especially Afghans. By Zakir's logic, if the Egyptian government wanted to destroy the Pyramids then its their right to and we shouldn't object to it. Nothing historically significant should be destroyed period, idc about which religion or country.
Beautifully said 👏
That's upto the Egyptians not u.
No, we can object to it but we can't force the Egyptians not to since it's their country.
But he's a Medical doctor!
I am Egyptian, the pyramids are a 3D triangle which is actual just a huge grave under it, and no status in Egypt is worshipped but you know what is worshipped buddha, so yeah like all the prophets did you gotta destroy false idols.
By this logic, nobody should be outraged if France bans hijabs or makes cartoons, it's their internal matter who are we to say
But somehow they will get mad and say it “ddiFFeReNt!”😂😂😂😂
Your contradicting yourself, France promotes free speech and "diversity" however Islam does not tolerate everything, so our logic is abseloutely unchanged and non contradictory
@@KingAlternate 😂😂 so destroying budh idol is allowed according to islam.
@@KingAlternate get lost you MLECCHHA... UNCIVILIZED BARBARIANS.
Our scriptures have instructed us to not to be friends with MLECHHAS and eliminate them completely.
who are you to say that...we should slap them ....if somebody try to harass your sis....and local law forbid your defened ...until you sue them to the court...you go on wait to be civilization person ....or you go on and defend to be terrorist....hijab is same things...they were selling there women...get them naked in street...sell them like a sheep...for public....they would like us to do same for ours..that mean they been destroyed by there culture....women rights is western culture go on destroy them...and they know that...now it is our turn...after Moslems...will be Hindu turn...after Hindu will be Sikh...after that chinese....we should go in unite to defend our community....
France is nothing...do you know what I mean...but Arab political people they don't want to do anythings...they can but....exactly as Indian goverment when she gave shelter to Hindu boy when Norway took him away from his parents...they forced them to release the boy and they did...boy went back to India...by refusing to sign communication contract till Indian boy go back to India....it is not France internal issue...
This guy is juvenile middle school debator. What's scary is adults in hundreds of thousands are listening to him with such attention.
1. Taliban has no business educating Buddhists.
2. Bamyan Buddha may have had religious significance back in the day. Today it has historic significance. By same logic, if an Islamic government were to come to power in Egypt they should demonish the sphinx and the pyramids?
3. Sometimes a historic article takes significance beyond a geographic boundary. If tomorrow the BJP government decides to demolish the taj mahal there should be global outrage.
This guy is "juvenile middle school debater" EXACTLY..💯
U got no rights too.
Classic Naik. Answering the questions with conjectures, quoting other scriptures, comparing other incidents. But never actually condemning anything. He only condemns when gets pressed by the people and media, and claims 'misquote'.
by destroying the statue in one country, they made the lives of so many Muslims across the world so much more harder since 2001. That is the law of cause and effect. And as Buddhist, I'm not mad that its destroyed. Nothing is permanent. I hope one day innocent Muslims no longer suffer from islamophobia across the world, that had resulted from the actions of Taliban and other groups in 2001.
@@crewmatewillthrowthesehand7600 Well the Taliban are back in power and majority of the afghans are happy they suffered more for 20 years from the coalition force who caused much destruction and misery than the Taliban did.
@@Ajmolali82 feel free to go there.
@@Ajmolali82 IT'S NOT THEM MY FRIEND. IT IS THE WILL OF ALLAH. ALLAH WANTED THOSE AFGHANS TO SUFFER FOR MORE THAN 100 YEARS FOR THE BAD THINGS THEY DID. AND IT'S NOT OVER YET. FAMIN IS ON THE WAY. INSHA ALLAH!!🤣😆😆🤣
@@Ajmolali82
Why don't you live under Sharia Law of Taliban in Afghanistan if you love them so much ?
What I have to say about this:
1. The destruction of Buddha statues was vandalism and offensive to Buddhists.
2. Outside the abrahamic religions the word "idolatry" does not exist. Therefore Buddha and Hindu statues are not idolatry.
3. Who are the Taliban to "educate Buddhists" if they don't even understand Buddhism?
4. It doesn't matter if Siddhartha Gautama Buddha never asked for statues as it is not forbidden in Buddhist scriptures either. Prohibition of statues solely belongs to the monotheistic abrahamic religions anyway.
5. If Muslims oppose idolatry, why do they pray in the direction of Mecca and once if a life time walk around the Kaaba?
1. It’s really none of Muslims problems as long as it isn’t hurting people of the book.
2. This is just false lol and pure misinformed arrogance.
3. It’s their land
And most importantly the fifth question can be answered with a quick google search 😊
Fake Buddhist, it's an illusion. Go & meditate.
What I can understand is, Mr. Naik will say It's ok if another government of a country chooses to destroy all the Mosqs and Qurans in it's country by thinking as they are its property.. He sets an good example for the people who have such intentions..Thank you for making it very very clear...
But the Bamyan buddhas were not a temple nor a book, nor did it have any active worshippers. So it cannot be compared to a mosque or a Quran or a temple or Geeta. By Dr. Zakir's policy, if the Indian govt. wants to destroy the Taj Mahal, Muslims can't do any objection because it's the property of the Indian govt. But mosques and Qurans aren't govt. property so they have no right to destroy them.
@@faisal-nl2vf ok i will buy quaran, then it is belonged to me, so I will burn and destroy it? Is it correct, how would u feel?
Facts 💯
@@faisal-nl2vf No they do, especially if its an ancient mosque because the government can pursue their own interests. No historical structure on Earth should be kept safe under Zakirs logic tbh, whatever the government wants to destroy, they can. The Egyptian government can destroy the Pyramids and we all have to be silent 🤫 and accept it.
@@faisal-nl2vf We have a mosque 50 years old, in my place and no Muslims come to that. Place is owned by local gov. Tell me what should we do, because we can really use that land for a public toilet.😝🤭
I took a pic of my grandma before she pass away. If i miss her, i can see this photo. My grandma never told me to take her photo. I know photo is just a piece of paper. I won't destroy this pieces of paper forever. Because I can see her love, care, words from her photo. Buddha statues are the same way.
You don't live forever right, who needs pic of your grandma after you die?
Make another in your country
@@ZahirSayed-vz1hd I am not interested in making or destroying any statue. I only love make truth and peace in my country.
@@kokoaung2914what have you done for your country.
Nothing bad. @@nadimovitch9237
Imagine comparing drugs with Buddhism holy moly
As a buddhist this is dumb logic. but no wonder .
Everything is a play of words with this guy. He can make anything he wants sound right and anything he want wrong by just verbal gymnastics and twisted logic. Its a pity so many are brainwashed into following him
Prove wrong than,, if you are so truthful and peaceful why don't you give us a better answer??
😂thats what America and western media do
@@toms116He finds other contradiction of other religions but hé doesnt find anything contradiction about Islam what we finds, like mohomad marry 6.yrs old...Even children know she was a child, but Islam suggust that 9yrs can understand the love sex and marriage with old man...This guy doesnt feel Mohomad wss Peadophilist. hé is just blind of Islam and nothing else...You believe anything hé pushes to believe in the name of god 😂😂😂😂
@@toms116can you prove winged horse with women face
@@AnujSharma56262 can you provide logical respectful reply without insulting? Or whining and crying is all you can be good at yes we muslims hate statues and it paganism if it in our country regardless it budah or whatever the heck it is it our land we do what we want and we will destroy it you people invade and kill real people and bunch of rocks is too hard for you
Absoulty pathetic
Very illogical answer!
I am from Afghanistan and alhamdulillah I am a Muslim, surely I can say that majority of Afghan nation doesn't support Taliban destroying Budha as we Afghans don't worship Budha but we just use the statues as historical sites.
Bro can u tell me how u feel about the Taliban.Both sides keep telling me soemthing else.I wanna hear from San Afghani
So you are condemning breaking of Idols by Prophet Abraham. Then you must also be condemning prophet Muhammad for breaking the statues in Kaba?
The majority support Taliban, Don't lie.
Answer is more logical than you think.
@@kodvavi150 Are your from Afghanistan or any other country ?
@@satguy145 I'm from Afghanistan but now I'm not in Afghanistan.
So, in short, Zakir Naik refrained from condemning the Taliban. Nice.
You want the truth? I am a Muslim, and many Muslims believe that it is our obligation to destroy idols. Yes, this is classified as vandalism. No, the majority of Muslims do not destroy idols unless they are present in predominantly Muslim countries governed by Sharia. There is also some disagreement among Muslims as to whether we have the right legally to destroy people’s idols as they are not our property, so the majority of Muslims do not act on this without Islamic majority rule because we did not purchase or construct the idols and therefore cannot destroy them legally.
@@DBUification by destroying the statue in one country, they made the lives of so many Muslims across the world so much more harder since 2001. That is the law of cause and effect. Eg. France hijab ban, xinjiang concentration camps, Rohingya crisis. And as Buddhist, I'm not mad that its destroyed. Nothing is permanent. But it's destruction has indeed given Muslims a bad reputation to other religious countries. I hope one day innocent Muslims no longer suffer from islamophobia across the world, that had resulted from the actions of Taliban and other groups in 2001.
Talibans are soldiers of allah
@@mizi6899 might wanna check out the Ben Shapiro video after that statement.
" Your job is to convey, granting hidayah is in the hands of Allaah(SWT)".
(Surah Ghashiah ch:88,V/s:21)
Lol ,,, “they are destroying Buddha in Afghanistan in their own country, what is your problem??” 😂 by the exact same logic, why do muslims get angry over charlie hebdo’s cartoon of Muhammad ??? They make cartoons in France ,,, what is your problem dear Muslims ?? You also can’t be double standard !!!
Making and destroying idols is different from mocking the prophet
Oh yeah ,,, tell that to a Buddhist or a Hindu ,,, Mocking prophet is a sensitive issue to you just like destroying idols could be a sensitive issue to others !!! You don’t have to value idols just like others don’t have to value your prophet !!! Only a hypocrite can’t understand this basic logic
@@toms116 Oh yeah ,,, tell that to a Buddhist or a Hindu ,,, Mocking prophet is a sensitive issue to you just like destroying idols could be a sensitive issue to others !!! You don’t have to value idols just like others don’t have to value your prophet !!! Only a hypocrite and a selfish bigot can’t understand this basic logic
@@toms116 Oh yeah ,,, tell that to a Buddhist or a Hindu ,,, Mocking prophet is a sensitive issue to you just like destroying idols could be a sensitive issue to others !!! You don’t have to value idols just like others don’t have to value your prophet !!! Only a hypocrite and a selfish small minded bigot can’t understand this basic logic
@@toms116 Oh yeah ,,, tell that to a Buddhist or a Hindu ,,, Mocking prophet is a sensitive issue to you just like destroying idols could be a sensitive issue to others !!! You don’t have to value idols just like others don’t have to value your prophet !!! Only a hypocrite and a selfish small minded bigot can’t understand this basic logic
Hes very good at making the wrong deeds look right .
Yes,he is very good in that..
Try refuting his points.
Thanks for making it clear, people can destroy other culture or religious statues or temples or mosques if they are not inline in with their culture.
Then why babri masjid or other maids in india.
Happens that there are no more buddhists in Afghanistan and since they own the land they have 100% right of destroying it.
They destroy mosques maybe not okay.
@@le2r if there an ancient mosque in india where no muslim perform salat. Then will you come with same logic?
You don’t have logical mind. You just blindly support zakir nayek's statement. Because in your mind zakir nayek is always right.
I believe that what the Taliban did was a grave mistake. This action did not help the Buddhists to learn any lesson nor did it spread any great lesson about Islam. On the contrary, it contributed well to harm the Muslim community and Islam in many ways. The Taliban is not representing the Muslim community nor are they the saviours of Islam. So when they do such a barbaric act the world won't accept it. As long as the non-Islamic world does not consider Islam to be superior, how can we teach them good lessons of such a global scale? We need to gain acceptance first. Else don't complain when others do untold cruelty to us. e.g. Chinese claiming that they are teaching Uigur Muslims to be civilised. Please understand the world we are living in. It is highly connected and misinformation can spread all around the world in seconds. Your intentions are nothing...and Islam and Muslims are not frozen in time. We need to learn to adapt to the changing world within the limits of Islam. Or lose it.
no idol worship allowed. you are incorrect.
@@birdnestratfest so you go around destroying other people's stuffs. Idol worship is haram and prohibited in ISLAM. Not for others and their beliefs. We can propogate Islam, spread the message of peace and truth and tolerance. Never spread hatred. It's haram and it is this attitude which made life of Muslims hectic all over the world. Sorry bro.. you are incorrect.
@@azeemsoona Dr Zakir Naik told you it's a muslim country so they removed the satanic idol
@@birdnestratfest Dr. Naik is a scholar. Very learned person. Agreed. His advice and analysis related to Islam is among the best. But as Muslims we follow the Quran and Hadith. Destroying a historical statue has global implications. There are even now thousands of historical statues and Idol worshipors in Muslim countries. Even this destroyed statue is restored with help from many countries. Think with a broader mind. May Allah guide us all.
@@azeemsoona if Allah soobhaana wattallaa asks you " did you help them build a statue or didn't warn them against worshipping statues " what are you going to do ?
According to this explanation the destruction of the Bhamian statue was the correct thing for 2 reasons the first being that the Buddha never condoned idolatry so to make Buddhists aware of that fact , the destruction was fair. The second is that, as it was the Taliban that governed Afghanistan it was their prerogative to destroy it if they wished so.
If you use the same argument (the second one) is it fair to destroy all mosques in non majority islamic countries? because it is within the right of that government to do so if they wish to and no one in that country or any islamic majority country has no right to protest against that. Do you agree with that argument which is fair as an argument while i never would subscribe to it. Because i believe in religious tolerance and anyone is free to believe in any religion of their choice.
What type of tolerance is this. While i do not agree with the second imaginary event of destroying mosques in non majority islamic countries, at the same time i can't condemn it, if i agree with his second reason given for the destruction of the Bhamian statues because it is within the right of the government of that country if it wishes to do so.
Most people of the world considered the
Bhamian statues as marvels and a world heritage of the creative skills of a people who lived in the past and not as an icon of a religion. So where is the so called tolerance which Islam espouses so much about to the rest of the world even if the statues were considered as idols of the Buddha .
Please also be aware that prophet Mohammed in his wisdom prohibited Allah, or Almighty god being depicted in a caricature or made in to a statue because the entire world is Allah, Almighty god or nature and is present everywhere and so cannot be made into one small caricature, statue, icon or idol.
On the other hand most Buddhists consider that by creating an icon of thier messiah (as the prophet Mohammed and Jesus were messiahs ) the people will have some allegiance to the message conveyed by him although i agree that the Buddha never condoned idolatry and Just like the Muslms are asked to pray five times a day which is to make people aware about islam so that more people will be naturally inclined towards following the
religion and making this world a better place to live for the people. Allah in Islam or Almighty god in Christianity which is none other than nature(if you want to call it Allah by all means do so) to which all of us have to subjugate ourselves willingly or unwillingly. (Insha Allah), The Buddha never dictated a set of precepts to follow blindly but to use your own wisdom to realise that there is a set of rules in nature(call it Allah if you wish so) that cannot be avoided by praying, worshipping or by way of offerings (pleading, submitting or offering bribes to nature or Allah or Almighty god) but to realise that, that is the way it is and if you have wisdom you can escape the suffering that is only a mind made illusion. May Allah help you realise that the whole world is an illusion of the mind and that is why when you are fast asleep there is neither the world nor you. That is equal to death in which neither you nor the world exist. You are not aware of your heart beat etc when you are aseelp but become aware of them only when you are awake and think that you were alive during your sleep only after you wake up from your sleep. May Allah help you realise this! and let there be peace in this illusory material world which in truth is an illusion of the mind.
Destroying a statue in the middle of nowhere that serves no religious purpose (not even allowed in Buddhism) is not the same as destroying mosques that serve an active religious purpose and are places of worship for Muslims every day.
To put this in another way, it is not okay for a state to destroy a place of worship like a Church or Synagogue that is actively used, but there is no problem with destroying a giant statue of Jesus or Moses which has no place in Christianity and Judaism and also makes the majority of the people uncomfortable.
@@Handle0108 There were offers to remove them and relocate them as well to places where they would be appreciated and yet those offers were rejected
There are no buddhists or any person worshiping those in afghanistan, their predecessors converted to islam. same happened in indonesia and malaysia.
@@arshmash5340 There are plenty of Buddhist in Malaysia and many Buddhist temples as well. There were offers to move the statues abroad but they were rejected
Dr. Naik is a respected comparitive studies scholar and answers questions were satisfactorily but I am not sure what he is doing here.
This should have been a straight yes or no answer backed by what's in scripture but he has gone into some twisted logic of his own which I find hard to buy.
This is no way of educating anyone as he claims. The blowing of the statues was taliban's pandering to their massive egos n bigotry. This can't not be called educating, you don't educate people by heaping humiliation on them. Dr. Naik is very much out of depth here.
I don’t understand how Muslims cannot condemn such acts or are there any Muslims with rationality or common sense
I condem it, this just just Zakir Naik.
@@sameedstien6118 i don't. We will destroy this idols. There is only one God. Shut up with your weak iman
More people care about people rather than statues.
Are you Muslim?
Sir where is your Instagram id I didn't found it as well as your TH-cam channel it is not showing any of your videos
His channel and all social media is block by Indian government. His channel will not get in India. Just change region in TH-cam to watch his videos
@@farhanimthiaz5041 brother how can I follow him in social media or any other place.??? I didn't found him anywhere
@@farhanimthiaz5041 ok in TH-cam I'll change it but what about in other places like social media and all
The Noble Quran is the guidance of a muslim,
He who recites the Quran, their status in this life will be raised,
Everlasting reward they will gain.
I invite you to join and see some miracles in the holy Qur'an.
👉 th-cam.com/channels/cWdFNFShPFLBv7-AlsdVGw.html 👈 😌
@@fahaidkhan7804 use VPN
The Qur’an identifies the ruler of Egypt as “Pharaoh” sixty-five times, but only in the story of Moses (peace be upon him).
Not a single time is Egypt’s earlier king during the time of Joseph (peace be upon him), called a “Pharaoh” in the Qur’an. This differs from the Old Testament which uses the label for both of these rulers (see: Genesis 40:7, 41:15/31/46, 50:7), though it has since been established that the term “Pharaoh” was first coined during the reign of Thutmose III (d. 1436 BC), the 18th dynasty of ancient Egypt.[16] Historians have further discovered that during the era of Joseph, the 15th to 17th dynasties of Egypt were an invading force from Palestine, and hence they were called the Hyksos (literally: foreign kings). Since “Pharaoh” meant “great house” or “elite bloodline,” and since the Hyksos were occupiers and not indigenous rulers, they were naturally ineligible for the honorific title-had it even existed.[17] Dr. Bucaille writes,
I must confess that when the Qur’an was first being conveyed to people, the ancient Egyptian language had vanished from the collective memory of humanity for over two centuries, and remained that way until the nineteenth century. Therefore, it was impossible for us to know that the king of Egypt should be called anything other than the title mentioned in the Holy Bible. The subtle word choice of the Qur’an on this matter is thought-provoking.[18]
The historical accuracy of the Qur’an is not just confirmed by recent archeological excavation; it astonished many early Jews and Christians just the same. The fact that Muhammad ﷺ could simply speak of personalities across different cultures like Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Jesus, Dhū al-Qarnayn, and others, with such detail was inexplicable. Similarly, the fact that he ﷺ could extensively illustrate scenes from the hereafter just as their earlier scriptures did was unbelievable for them, as Allah said, “Over it (Hellfire) are nineteen. And We have not made the keepers of the Hellfire but angels, and We have not made their number except as a trial for those who disbelieve (i.e., will they mock nineteen as few?), and so that those who were given the Scripture [prior] would be certain...” (74:31).
Some Jews in Madīnah conceded that Muhammad ﷺ was, in fact, a true prophet, then resisted his message under the indefensible claim that it only applied to the Arabs. This was due to their inability to contest its divine origin, for they knew there was no access to any semblance of this history in the Arabic language whatsoever. As Allah says, “That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. You knew it not, neither you nor your people, before this” (11:49). Some of the toughest critics of the Qur’an today, like William Tisdall, confirm this: “There seems to be no satisfactory proof that an Arabic version of the New Testament existed in Muhammad’s time.”[19] In a similar vein, Pope Tawadrus II of Alexandria writes, “The first Arabic translation surfaced towards the end of the eighth Gregorian century and more than one hundred years after Islam. It was done by Bishop John of Seville in Spain. It was a partial translation that did not include the entire book, and was insufficiently circulated.”[20] As for the Torah, there is near consensus among Orientalist scholars that even incomplete translations of the Old Testament into Arabic did not exist until the 10th century.[21]
Some detractors of Islam argue that none of this history is remarkable, let alone miraculous. They claim Muhammad ﷺ either learned these accounts directly from the mouths of his contemporaries or that he plagiarized them from manuscripts of the Bible that have since been lost. The accusation of being spoon-fed by others existed during the Prophet’s ﷺ life, but it quickly disappeared, and until today most serious Qur’an critics avoid citing such a ludicrous proposition because it risks their being perceived as desperate. First of all, this would be contrary to the historically indisputable integrity of Muhammad’s character. Secondly, the suggestions that Muhammad’s ﷺ knowledge of previous prophets and nations came from a Roman blacksmith in Mecca (a layman), or from a passing midday encounter with Baḥīrah the Monk, or to a single conversation with a dying Waraqah ibn Nawfal, are simply implausible. Sensible people realize that the bulk and veracity of what the Prophet ﷺ brought could only be attained with decades of apprenticeship that would be impossible for him to hide. “Say, ‘If Allah had willed, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have made it known to you, for I had remained among you a lifetime before it. Then will you not reason?’” (10:16). As for the second accusation, that of plagiarism from the texts of Judeo-Christian scholars, only someone with a strong confirmation bias would consider this possibility, for two major reasons:
As shown earlier, the Qur’an escapes the Bible’s minefield of historical inaccuracies unscathed. Therefore, in order for the unique Qur’anic narrative to be plagiarized from an earlier scripture, this would necessitate that the Prophet ﷺ somehow had access to the accurate version from the thousands of variant manuscripts. Moreover, this version would have existed only in 7th-century Arabia of all places, in a foreign language Muhammad ﷺ secretly learned, then vanished without a trace, never to be recovered again.
Even if this bizarre hypothetical were true, it only accounts for the source of this incredible precision and ignores the miraculous nature of the end-product. The Qur’an responds to this notion, asserting, “And We certainly know that they say, ‘It is only a human being who teaches him [the Prophet].’ The tongue of the one they refer to is foreign, and this Qur’an is [in] a clear Arabic language” (16:103
Completely destroyed the questioner, Zakir is right people have double standards especially hindus.
What a chutiya answer. It's good that we got rid of him from India.
I,m Afghan i have to say that the Taliban did destroy the boddah it was totally a wrong decision. I am not agree with their idee.it was just our manifestation of ancient civilization.
It was Afghans heritage. The hazara looked after these beautiful statues for many centuries.
i am not agree with his statement. what ever done in Bamiyan Buddha Statue was not good. Also is not good some people burning holy book in Denmark and Sweden."Property concept" is not making sense.
Good morning everyone 👏
Never lose hope in the mercy of Allah
@@allah547 Allah is Almighty n we are servants of Allah
@@allah547 Mohammad is prophet of Allah
@@allah547 May I know the punishment for rape and murder according to your Bible?
@@allah547 Allah means God in Arabic even some Arab christians use the word Allah you're just a troll who doesn't have a life.
@@allah547 Did you study first?
This logic is absolutely disgusting! He is pretty much asking Islamic Government everywhere to destroy statues of other religions.
ISIS uses the same warped logic as Zakir to justify their intolerance
It's none of your business really. Go look after your family & stop crying about statues. 🤣🤣😭
@@nadimovitch9237Why destroying the heritage of the people that was previously there?, some of them are now in other countries because they have to exit their homelands. Is a question of humanity, to preserve and acknowledge different cultures
@@martillodelajusticia7211 those ppl are long gone. Pls stop living in the past.
@@nadimovitch9237the only person living in past are you. Living in 1400 years ago
Afghani don't understand that there ancestors built it. And had respect towards Buddha. And Mr Naik we don't worship buddha statue. We just show respect.
Love & respect Dr Zakir naik from #Bamiyan Province of Afghanistan
@@allah547 Afghanistan is the third growing fast country in the world
The Noble Quran is the guidance of a muslim,
He who recites the Quran, their status in this life will be raised,
Everlasting reward they will gain.
I invite you to join and see some miracles in the holy Qur'an.
👉 th-cam.com/channels/cWdFNFShPFLBv7-AlsdVGw.html 👈 😌
By the help of Allah (swt) May my brothers and sisters live peacefully there and become successful in this life and hereafter. Insha'allah ameen.
@@allah547 get well soon brother. 😇❤
Please Subscribe to our channel of
"DAWAT FOR ISLAM"
th-cam.com/channels/UTFneIT5AhgsyNT3XHeycw.html
Can any one help me...
How can I ask question to Dr Zakir Naik via whatsapp....?
1st you call the Taliban if they did not pick up keep waiting, and your call will be automatically diverted to him.
Then don't cry when the babri masjid is destroyed. And thanks for educating us about this evil.
May Allah continue to bless you brother Naik. And to everyone here 🙂
Brother Zakir Naik please dua for me I am in so much problem😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
What are you doing here man?
@@ridoanirfan5162 we will all make dua for you. If you have any problems you can always message me 😎
@@ABMRefutes 😂 I always Hang around this side of TH-cam 😎
@@halalhomer hehe😂
Oddly enough, these statues were actually built during the 6th-7th centuries, when a Turkic empire called Hephtalites aka White Huns ruled this area. There was a turkic tribe called Kalaj amongst them. This empire practised buddhism before they were conquered by Muslims. After a long period of time these Kalajis intermixed with the local population and become pashtunisized. Today their heirs are called Ghilzai or Ghilji, from Kalaj-zai = sons of the Kalaj.
The Taliban leader who gave the order to destroy this statues was from the Ghilzai tribe himself (of the Hotaki subgroup). Mullah Omar Muhammed.... history is mindblowing...
The Statue was their even before Islam 😢
People taking drugs is very different from those who build a replica of the person whom they revier. If something is wrong as per your faith does not mean it is wrong as per anothers faith. If the Buddhist scriptures does not say that they should build a statue it also does not say that they should not either. If the Buddhist scripture said that they could build a statue, would you still destroy it then since you scripture says you should not build any statues? Why are you, and who are you to correct someone else about their faith. According to them they think they are right just as much as you think you are right. If according to some other religion, building a place of worship is wrong as per their scripture and the land becomes theirs. Would you be okay if they started demolishing all the mosques in the land? This man is just twisting wrong deeds to make them look right.
Drug addicts have rights too, so get off ur high horse (pun intended)
Similarities between Hinduism and Islam
So the major difference between the Hindu and the Muslims is, the common Hindu says that everything is God, we Muslim say everything is God’s. ‘G’ ‘O’ ‘D’ with an apostrophe ‘S’. The major difference is the apostrophe ‘s’. If we can solve this difference of apostrophe ‘S’, the Hindus and the Muslims will be united. How would do you do it? As the Qur’an says, “Ta`alaw 'Ilá Kalimatin Sawa'in Baynana Wa Baynakum” “Come to common terms as between us and you” Which is the first term? “Alla Na`buda 'Illallah” “That we believe in only One Almighty God” Let us try and understand what the Hindu scriptures have to speak about Almighty God. It is mentioned in the
Chandogya Upanishad,
Chapter No. 6, Section No. 2, Verse No. 1, it says, “Ekam Evadvitiyam” It’s a Sanskrit quotation which means, “God is only one without a second.”
It is mentioned in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, Chapter No. 6, Verse No. 9, “Na casya Kascij janita na Cadhipah.” “Of Him there are no parents, he has got no lords, Almighty God has got no mother, he has got no father, he has got no master, he has got no superior” It’s mentioned in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, Chapter No. 4, Verse No. 19, “Na Tasya Pratima Asti” “Of Him there is no likeness” It’s further mentioned in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, Chapter No. 4, Verse No. 20, that “His form cannot be seen. No one can see Him with their eyes.” Amongst all the Hindu scriptures the most widely read and the most popular is the Bhagavad Gita. It’s mentioned in Bhagavad Gita Chapter No. 7, Verse No. 20, “All those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires, they worship demi Gods.” Which means all materialistic people, they worship demi gods, that is the false gods besides the one true Almighty God. It’s further mentioned in Bhagavad Gita Chapter No. 10, Verse No. 3, that “He who knows me as the unborn, the beginning less, the supreme Lord of all the worlds.” Amongst the Hindu scriptures, the most sacred are the Vedas. It’s mentioned in the Yajurveda Chapter No. 32, Verse No. 3, “Na Tasya Pratima Asti” “Of Him there are no images.” Almighty God has got no images, and it further says that he’s unborn, he alone only should be worshipped. It’s mentioned in Yajurveda, Chapter No. 40, Verse No. 8, that “Almighty God is imageless and pure.” It’s mentioned in Yajurveda Chapter No. 40 Verse No. 9, “Andhatma Pravishanti ya Aasambhuti mupaste.” ‘Andhatma’ means darkness. ‘Pravishanti’ means entering and ‘Asambhuti’ means the natural things like fire, water, air. It means, “They are entering darkness those who worship the natural things like fire, water, air and the verse continues, they are entering more in darkness those who worship the created things” Like table, chair, idols etc. Who says that? Yajurveda Chapter No. 40 Verse No. 9. It’s further mentioned in the Atharvaveda, Book No. 20, Hymn No. 58, Verse No. 3, “Dev maha Asi” “Verily great is Almighty God.” And amongst the Hindu scriptures, the most sacred are the Rigveda. It’s mentioned in the Rigveda, Book No. 1, Hymn No. 164, Verse No. 46, the Shlokas which were recited by the respected Pandits, it says, “Ekkam sad vipra bhudha vidante” “Ekkam sad vipra bhudha vidante” Which means, “Truth is one, God is one, sages call him by various names.” And the same message is repeated in Rigveda, Book No. 10, Hymn No. 114, Verse No. 5, that God is one but sages call him by a variety of names.” And in Rigveda alone, in Book No. 2 Hymn No. 1 there are no less than 33 different attributes given to Almighty God, many of which were recited by the respected Pandits. One amongst them in Rigveda, Book No. 2, Hymn No. 1, Verse No. 3 is Brahamma. Brahamma is called the creator. If you translate into Arabic, it means Khaliq. We Muslims have got no objection if someone calls Almighty God as Khaliq or the Creator, but if someone says the creator is Almighty God who has got four heads and on each head is a crown, we Muslims take strong exception to it. More over, you are going against Shvetashvatara Upanishad Chapter No. 4 Verse No. 19 which says, “Na Tasya Pratima Asti” “Of Him there is no likeness” Another attribute given in Rigveda, Book No. 2, Hymn No. 1, Verse No. 3 is ‘Vishnu’. Vishnu is called the Sustainer, the cherisher. If you translate into Arabic, it is somewhat similar to Rabb. We Muslims have got no objection if someone says Almighty God is Rabb or Sustainer or Cherisher. But if someone says Sustainer, he’s Almighty God who has got four hands, one of his right hand is the Disc, the Chakra, the other hand he has the conch, he’s traveling on the bird by the name of Garuda or reclining on couch of snakes, we Muslims take strong objection to it. Moreover you are going against the Yajurveda, Chapter No. 32, Verse No. 3 which says, “Na Tasya Pratima Asti” “Of Him there are no images” If you read Rigveda, all these descriptions are not given, the attributes are given that Almighty God is creator, he’s sustainer, he’s cherisher. We have no objection with attribute, but these images are not given because it is mentioned in the Veda’s that Almighty God has got no images. It’s further mentioned in Rigveda, Book No. 8, Hymn No. 1, Verse No. 1, “Ma Chidanyadvi Sansad” “Ma Chidanyadvi Sansad” Which means, “Do not worship anyone except the one God.” It’s mentioned in Rigveda, Book No. 6, Hymn No. 45, Verse No. 16, “Ya Ekit Mushtihi” “Praise him alone, the one true God” And the Brahma Sutra of the Vedanta is “Ekam Brahm, dvitiya naste neh na naste kinchan” Which means, “Bhagwan ek hi hai doosra nahi hai, nahi hai, nahi hai, zara bhi nahi hai.”
You will find Messages on my facebook page
facebook.com/CureforIslamophobia
To see Debate between - Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar vs Dr Zakir Naik concept of God in Hinduism and Islam according to scripture Part1
facebook.com/CureforIslamophobia/videos/4745927988781088
Part2
facebook.com/CureforIslamophobia/videos/4741366045903949
As salam aleyküm ve rahmetullah from Turkey everyone. Maşallah ustaz Zakir . Allah bless u inşallah 👍
Walaikum Assalam.
@@ghufrananaqvi9031 ☺👏👏
@Khfsf Sağol kardeş
I have a question dr sahb is drawing pictures haram in Islam please reply
Yes
جزاكم الله خيرا
Muhammad commanded his followers NOT to build a tomb for him after his death. They built it anyway and it remains one the most holy sites in Islam. By Naik's logic if another country, say the U.S., were to destroy Muhammad's tomb that would not be wrong because they are merely "educating" Muslims on what Muhammad commanded....
Source?
@mijiihh genauere Quellen ?ich hab den hadith gelesen und da stand nix
Which tomb are you referring to??
Still waiting for your sources 🤣🤣😭😭😭
The mahavir statue still exists outside the hotel , the hotel ha suffered losses and the statue is in wants of repairs alongwith the hotel blldg. Seems the statue didn't bring any good fortune to the owner.
What if this happened to mosques or black cubes how would yall feel
Love from Kashmir
What's is the condition of Kashmir now ...?
Indian soldiers till attacking you....?
@@muhammedrashid8466 the bad situation will continue till freedom
Masha Allah
god work i old stay conniactd nice sharing but ithanks al fridاگر اپ بھی اسٹیٹ شاٹ وکٹ پہ کھیلے
May Allah bless you all
الحمدلله رب العلمين
Allah is One
إن الدين عند الله الإسلام
Alhamdulillah. Allah is none.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iah
صلى الله عليه وسلم 💖💖☝️
Refuting Allegations and anti-islamic polemics like DAVID WOOD. Clear your misconception and know truth about Islam. I ask you to join me.
👆
@Ahmayoh's bro thank you akhi.😊❤️
MashaAllah
Nice
4:24 mahavir statue outside airport wasn't destroyed, but relocated with 0% loss in integrity
Sun Setting in Murky Water❓
Refuting a repetitive missionary allegation
by
Hesham Azmy
Although we keep answering accusations of Christian missionaries against our religion and Scripture, they vehemently keep parroting them again and again as if we have not answered them already!! Jesus is reported to have said,
"Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"
(Matthew 7:1-3)
We will show here that what is in their eye is not just a beam, but a big wedge! Well, among the issues whom Christian missionaries use to object against the Holy Qur'an is the following passage,
"They ask thee concerning Zul-Qarnain. Say, I will rehearse to you something of his story. Verily we established his power on earth, and we gave him the ways and the means to all ends. One (such) way he followed. Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it set in a spring of murky water: near it he found a people." (Holy Qur'an 18:83-86)
Their objection is that how sun could set in a spring of murky water while it is over billion times greater than earth and can never set in a spring of a murky water! They persistently confront us with this objection in all their arguments concerning scientific aspects of the Qur'an.
Well, we are going, insha'Allah, to answer them. I begin and quote the following biblical verse,
"Are they not on the other side Jordan, by the way where the sun goeth down, in the land of the Canaanites, which dwell in the champaign over against Gilgal, beside the plains of Moreh?"
(Deuteronomy 11:30)
As we all know there is no way where the sun goes down because the sun is over billion times greater than earth . etc.. while if the meaning is that it is the way where it appears to people that sun goes down in, the objection will be solved. But certainly they accept such explanations for their Scripture, not for ours! Moreover, the verse is very clumsy as one of our Arab brothers notes ,
The text as you see is extremely clumsy as if he describes the address for a lost person: Where-the-sun-goeth-down St., Canaanites' City, leave the first plain of Moreh, right against Gilgal!
Let's move on to another verse,
"The sun shall not smite thee by day, nor the moon by night."
(Psalms 121:6)
We quite understand what is meant by the sun smiting someone, but what is meant by moon smiting?! Is there anything known - for example - as moon stroke?! Perhaps we should know!
Our last biblical quotation is this,
"And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars." (Revelation 12:1)
How can a woman be clothed with the sun which is over billion times greater than earth?!! This is indeed mythical!
Now, we leave the Bible to discuss the objection of the missionaries. The verse says, "he found it set in a spring of murky water" i.e., according to his vision and sight that's why Allah does not say "it is setting".
Imam Al-Baidawi notes,
He probably reached shore of the ocean and saw it like that because there was but water at the furthest of his sight that's why He says "he found it set" and does not say "it sets". (Al-Baidawi, Anwar-ut-Tanzil wa Asrar-ut-Taw'il, Volume 3, page 394. Published by Dar-ul-Ashraf, Cairo, Egypt)
Imam Al-Qurtubi states,
Al-Qaffal said: It is not meant by reaching the rising or setting of the sun that he reached its body and touched it because it runs in the sky around the earth without touching it and it is too great to enter any spring on earth. It is so much larger than earth. But it is meant that he reached the end of populated land east and west, so he found it - according to his vision - setting in a spring of a murky water like we watch it in smooth land as if it enters inside the land. That is why He said, "he found it rising on a people for whom we had provided no covering protection against the sun." (Holy Qur'ân 18:90) and did not mean that it touches or adheres to them; but they are the first to rise on.
Al-Qutabiy said: Probably this spring is a part of the sea and the sun sets behind, with or at it, so the proposition takes the place of an adjective and Allah knows best. (Al-Qurtubi, Al-Game' le Ahkam-el-Qur'an, Volume 16, page 47. Published by Dar-ul-Hadith, Cairo, Egypt. ISBN 977-5227-44-5)
Imam Fakhr-ud-Deen Ar-Razi states,
When Zul-Qarnain reached the furthest west and no populated land was left, he found the sun as if it sets in a dark spring, but it is not in reality. The same when sea traveler sees the sun as if it sets in the sea if he cannot see the shore while in reality it sets behind the sea. (Ar-Razi, At-Tafsir-ul-Kabir, Volume 21, page 166)
Imam Ibn Kathir states,
"Until, when he reached the setting of the sun" means he followed a certain way till he reached the furthest land he could go from the west. As for reaching the setting of the sun in the sky, it is impossible. What narrators and story tellers say about that he walked for a period of time in earth while the sun was setting behind him is unreal, and most of it is from myths of People of the Book and inventions of their liars.
"he found it set in a spring of murky water" means he saw the sun according to his vision setting in the ocean and this is the same with everyone ending to the shore seeing as if the sun sets inside it (i.e. the ocean).
(Ibn Kathir, Tafsir-ul-Qur'ân Al-'Azim, Volume 5, page 120. Published by Maktabat-ul-Iman, Mansoura, Egypt)
Good
Sir i had a question that why Prophet Muhammad(saw) had a 2nd mother(to drink milk) when he had his real mother amena still alive. Other then that back then lots of people did this, giving ther child to drink milk from another mother.
My question is Why did they do that? Hope you'll reply.❤️
EXPIRED MILK.. I GUESS..
Nobody goes there to kneel and worship the statue. This is a historical statue that should not be destroyed in this manner! Why do you always take sides with the inhumane terrorists?
I love the program of doctor zakir naik ,God will bless you at the intermediate place ✔
I see no difference with the ideology of ISIS but perhaps that was the point of this extremist hate preacher
Is that intermediate place you talk of Tihar Jail. 😅😅🤣🤣🤣
As a non god believer and Religions...
I find Zakir is irresponsable guy when he talk comparative Religions...
If you study or follow comparative Religions, then your address should respect these things instead of Destruction....Because this is world heritage site and ancienne one,...You should have a knowledge about what is meant about World heritage site, it is not a statue that you are talking about newly built Mahawira statue.....
Zakir contradicts own logics but poor uneducated Muslims believe that this guy is smart Because he find something in books...😅😅
According to.Zakir Logiques..
Non Muslims countries should not allow to build new mosquée, or remove those already built ...Because it is gouvernement property and majority accpets it to destroy all Mosques....
We should try at least..😂😂😂😂
One time in western country a man asked Swami vivekanand " in ur holy book it is written what ever happened all things r good" how u explain it ? Swami vivekanand explained " what ever do you feel good for whole world it must be bad for any time or any place & vice versa" Nothing is good or bad. Only the situation decide what is good or what is bad.
Ur explanation must be right at some point but at other point it must be wrong.
Dr. Naik is a respected comparitive studies scholar and answers questions were satisfactorily but I am not sure what he is doing here.
This should have been a straight yes or no answer backed by what's in scripture but he has gone into some twisted logic of his own which I find hard to buy.
This is no way of educating anyone as he claims. The blowing of the statues was taliban's pandering to their massive egos n bigotry. This can't not be called educating, you don't educate people by heaping humiliation on them. Dr. Naik is very much out of depth here
This is also called Al-Hikmah in Islam and it is gifted by Allah to whoever He wills to gift. Allah states in Quran:
(هُوَ ٱلَّذِی بَعَثَ فِی ٱلۡأُمِّیِّـۧنَ رَسُولࣰا مِّنۡهُمۡ یَتۡلُوا۟ عَلَیۡهِمۡ ءَایَـٰتِهِۦ وَیُزَكِّیهِمۡ وَیُعَلِّمُهُمُ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ *وَٱلۡحِكۡمَةَ* وَإِن كَانُوا۟ مِن قَبۡلُ لَفِی ضَلَـٰلࣲ مُّبِینࣲ)
[Surah Al-Jumu'ah 2]
He (Allah) it is Who sent among the unlettered ones a Messenger (Muhammad SAW) from among themselves, reciting to them His Verses, purifying them (from the filth of disbelief and polytheism), and teaching them the Book (this Quran, Islamic laws and Islamic jurisprudence) and *Al-Hikmah (The Wisdom*, the Sunnah: legal ways, orders, acts of worship, etc. of Prophet Muhammad SAW). And verily, they had been before in mainfest error.
Did Allah create the Universe in 6 days
Say: Is it that ye Deny Him Who created the earth in two Days? And do ye join equals with Him? He is the Lord of (all) the Worlds. (Fussilat 9)
He set on the (earth) mountains standing firm, high above it, and bestowed blessings on the earth and measured therein all things to give them nourishment in due proportion, in four Days, in accordance with (the needs of) those who seek (sustenance). (Fussilat 10)
So He completed them as seven firmaments in two Days, and He assigned to each heaven its duty and command. And We adorned the lower heaven with lights, and (provided it) with guard. Such is the Decree of (Him) the Exalted in Might, Full of knowledge. (Fussilat 12)
When God Almighty willed to create the universe, He produced an indefinite amount of energy by showing His endless power; that energy condensed in time and turned to gas. Then it condensed again and turned to its present solid state. The earth formed in two geological eras and then the sources there were determined; it reached its present state by forming in four geological periods eras based on the plan. The word yawm (day) in the verse means a long period whose beginning and end is not definitely known (...) The skies formed seven layers together with the earth in seven long periods. They were all in the state of gas. It took them two periods to concentrate and solidify.
According to the analysis of the first sentence, the meaning is He created the earth in two days. When the earth was created, there was no “day” in the sense we know yet; so, day means time, that is, in two periods; Allah knows the best. One of them is the day when the sky was separated from the earth as it is stated in this verse: " Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of Creation), before We clove them asunder? " (al-Anbiya, 21/30), and the other is when the crust of the earth was started to be placed in the form of a cream layer as it is stated in this verse: “And it is He Who spread out the earth." (ar-Ra'd, 13/3). According to the second analysis, the meaning is He created the earth in two days. In this case, it is not mentioned in how many days the earth was created but its state in two days after it was created is mentioned; it means the two solstices that divide the year into two. The earth was created in a form to cycle between those two periods.
He pressed onto it; the mountains nail the crust of the earth to its base. That "waw" is used for the beginning; it does not refer to the verb because there is an interval. He brought about abundance in it. He produced good things, and sources of abundance like water sources, mines plants and animals with their power to be born and die. He ordained their sustenance in it; that is, He determined the amounts of rain and other things that plants and animals needed in order to live and arranged them in the form of earth. He did all of them in four days. Including the previous two, it is four days; there are two meanings in it like the others. One is the creation of the mines and the mountains; the other is the creation of the plants and animals, which amounts to four with the previous two. The other is the state, which shows the four seasons; thus, the previous two are included here. In my opinion, this meaning here is more in the foreground and more appropriate in terms of the coherence of the expression. The bounties and sustenance of the earth grow in the four seasons every year. Their number, amount and shape form in them; therefore, attributing them to the verbs may express the same meaning. Then, in terms of that meaning, this sentence becomes clear: four days equally for all researchers because all of the sustenance of those that seek sustenance grows in those four seasons; even if the sustenance is not equal, the days are equal. The number of the four seasons for each of them is four. It may be thought to mean those who ask about it.
Then, the skies are dealt with and it is stated that they were completed to seven strong skies in two days. One of those two days is for the creation of matter and the other is for the formation of things, which form the two days of the six days stated in the chapter al-Araf. Or, one of them is before the creation of the earth and the other is after. The creation of some celestial bodies like the moon, Venus, Mercury, etc is after the creation of the earth.
In my opinion, it is probable that one of those two days is the world and the other is the hereafter. He made them strong and completed them. He gave each sky the command related to them in the form of revelation. He gave the angels in each sky the command of the events to take place there, which is included in the completion. Since the evidence of the power of the Creator has become manifest and appeared in the creation and completion of them, the subject of the sentence is transformed into the first person singular from the third person singular, and the following is stated: " We have indeed decked the lower heaven with beauty (in) the stars." (as-Saffat, 37/6) . And we have protected them. The devils cannot approach them. It is the determination of Allah, al-Aziz (the Mighty and Strong) and al-Alim (the Knower of All).
Your Guardian-Lord is Allah, Who created the heavens and the earth in six Days, then He established Himself on the Throne (of authority) … (al-Araf, 54)
An example of the harmony between the Quran and modern science is the issue of the age of the universe: Cosmologists calculated the age of the universe to be 16-17 billion years. It is stated in the Quran that the whole universe was created in 6 days. There is a surprising harmony between those figures that seem different at first sight. As a matter of fact, both of those figures related to the age of the universe are correct. That is, the universe was created in 6 days as it is stated in the Quran, and that period corresponds to 16-17 billion years in our perception of the time.
In 1915, Einstein put forward that time was relative and that the flow coefficient of time changed based on the place, the speed of the traveling person and the force of gravity at that time. It is seen that the duration of the creation of the universe stated in 7 different verses of the Quran is greatly parallel to the calculations of the scientists when the differences in the flow coefficient of time is considered. We can consider the 6 days mentioned in the Quran as 6 periods. When the relativity of time is taken into consideration, “day” expresses the 24-hour period only as perceived in the world under the circumstances of today. However, in a different place of the universe, at a different time and under a different condition, “day” is a much longer period of time. As a matter of fact, the word ayyam (days) in the phrase “6 days” (sittati ayyamin) also means era, period, duration apart from meaning days in the following verses: (as-Sajda, 4; Yunus, 3; Hud, 7; al-Furqan, 59; al-Hadid, 4; Qaf, 38; al-Araf, 54).
In the first periods of the universe, time flowed. Much faster than the pace that we are used to today. The reason is this: during the Big Bang, the universe had been condensed into a very small point. The expansion of the universe since that big bang and the tension in the volume of the universe expanded the borders of the universe to billions of light years away. As a matter of fact, the fact that the space has been tensioning since Big Bang has played an important role on the time of the universe.
The energy during the moment of Big Bang slowed down the flow of the time of the universe million by million times (1012). When the universe was created, the flow coefficient of the time of the universe, as it is perceived today, was a trillion times bigger, that is time flowed faster. Thus, during the time when we live a trillion minutes in the world, only one minute passes in terms of the time of the universe.
When the period of 6 days is calculated by taking the relativity of time into consideration, it corresponds to 6 trillion. It is because the time of the universe flows a trillion times faster than that of the world. The number of years corresponding to 6 trillion days is about 16,427 billion. That figure falls into the interval of the estimated age of the universe.
6.000.000.000.000 days / 365,25 = 16.427.104.723 years
On the other hand, each one of the 6 days of the creation corresponds to different time periods from one another - in terms of our perception of time. It is because of the fact that the flow coefficient of time decreases inversely proportional to the expansion of the universe. Every time the size of the universe doubled since Big Bang, the flow coefficient of time decreased in half. As the universe got bigger, the doubling speed of the universe slowed down increasingly. That expansion rate is a scientific reality that is explained in the textbooks “the Fundamentals of Physical Cosmology” and that is widely known all over the world. When we calculate each day of the creation in terms of the time of the world, the following state appears:
* When the moment that time started is taken into consideration, the 1st day (1st period) of the creation lasted 24 hours. However, that period corresponds to 8 billion years to the time as we perceive in the world.
* The 2nd day (2nd period) lasted 24 hours. However, that period lasted half as much as the 1st day, that is 4 billion years in terms of the time we perceive in the world.
* The 3rd day (3rd period) lasted half as much as the 2nd day, that is, 2 billion years.
* The 4th day (4th period) lasted 1 billion year.
* The 5th day (5th period) lasted 500 billion years.
* And the 6th day (6th period) lasted 250 billion years.
Cure4islamophilia: What is the source of this complete nonsense?
@@AS-jj4dv what's used to you
@@AS-jj4dv on Friday 9PM Hamzas den live stream Atheism your invited
Afghanistan was so peaceful untill the religion of peace attacked 😂
Supported by the USA during the '79 war with Russia. Keep up or clear off.
@@nadimovitch9237 k the main topic is the attacker not the supporter lil bro
@@sewiim3612 Wwwooosssh, regime installed by a foreign entity for it's own geo political reasons. Not for the sake of the country or it's ppl. If the yanks hadn't stuck their beak in, it was much less likely to happen.
Good reply brother Zakir Naik.
Btw Taliban destroyed the whole country for us not just one statue and it wasn't an Afghan government rather a foreigner one hence they destroyed our history.
Why cud they not preserve history??..Those statues were built thousand of years ago. Cud they not be appreciated as art?? Work of the past ..
Nothing to do with Buddhism.
Not a practical man at all. Heart ache listening to him.
Art for Muslims nowadays ? You must be joking.
@@arthurfleck8862there is plenty of art u philistine.
That's the same thing I've been telling people at that time
In that case you are totally wrong ... change your perception and thoughts for your and other’s better future
@@satguy145 what's wrong?
@@alfaaz135 Naik’s support to demolition of statues is totally wrong ... if you support that I say that your thoughts are wrong too
@@satguy145 according to u it's wrong not religion
@@alfaaz135 Islam is against Idol worship that means Muslims should not do the idol worship ..... we will not force you to do the same bcoz I don’t have right to do that .... Similarly you don’t have right to stop us doing the idol worship ... you ppl don’t have the right to demolish the idols of the other religions
Sir your channel is removed,, please make another channel 🙏🙏🙏
Change the TH-cam location from India to other country and you will get it back
Brother plz change your TH-cam location ...go to Utube setting - general setting- Location
may karma take care of him in this cycle of life and may he suffer for the rest of his sansara RIP D.I.C.K. ZAKIR ZAIPAIYA
Islam is the true religion.
I invite you to learn more about your faith :)
@@apoorva4346 unlike christianity if it is against the teaching of the prophets, the book that you said islamic is false book and we reject it
@@apoorva4346 What is wrong with hadiths?
@@amsyar4223 He is hindu I reckon
@@allah547 On what basis did you say that? Why do you believe prophet Jesus pbuh is your God in flesh?
@@allah547 I don't see any difference between the kkk and Christians.
DEMONSTRATION OF THE EXISTENCE AND ONENESS OF GOD
1- introduction and divine uniqueness
2-existence of God
3-rules of application.
1- First of all, let us define reason and see its reliability: reason consists in understanding, ordering, prohibiting or administering through its distinction between good and evil to reach the reasonable one who serves and does not serve.
Let's see if reason is reliable:everyone of good reason confirms that reason is educated by its environment from a young age in order to distinguish good from evil,true from false,it starts with: fire or needle hurts, milk makes good, then truth and lie, with internal and external verification by experience, then we generalize to the extension of reason (like happiness and unhappiness) and to the abstract by returning from time to time to the experience of reason by recognized examples, so we can say that reason is reliable.
As for the ego, the self, it has its importance in my subject, because it compares and seeks (in cooperation with the reason) the ideal, the most powerful because the top is the most reasonable for him otherwise if a strong thing is not enough for him,he will get tired of it and look for something stronger than it, he'll be unhappy, in relative insecurity, because he's looking for the solid pillar, hence the expression "in myself something" to say that it's not satisfactory.
Definition of worship in religion: to submit oneself to a being or a thing by love and veneration, to believe that it is useful and harmful (we see the link with the definition of reason and its combination with the ego and that then we live to worship anything and in a correct and reasonable way we seek "summit" happiness (for the ego, the summit is the most satisfying for the heart-ego) through that being or that thing since we take the reasonable).
Definition of a god:a god is a being or a thing that we worship or is worshipful (worshipful=which deserves to be worshipped),we will be satisfied (this is the goal) to take the definition of a god as a being or a thing that is worshipful
Equivalence "a god" and "he is a creator (from nothing)":
A creator (from nothing) is a god: everything around us is made up of already existing elements, so creation from nothing is superior and it is the most impressive form of creation so it is summit (the heart and the ego confirm), so any creator from nothing is a god.
Every god is a creator: if a god was not a creator then he would not deserve to be a god because God the Necessary Being (see part 2) is a creator (the creator see 2), therefore superior to that god, therefore that god does not deserve (for reason and ego) to be a god, he does not bring anything more, hence every god is a creator.Hence the equivalence.
God the creator, the necessary being is the summit for the heart-ego: if he had a superior then that superior would be unknown, erased, moreover for the heart-ego it would imply that the necessary being is no longer a god (the heart-ego sees higher) therefore no longer a creator whereas it is the necessary being (contradiction) therefore that superior is not a god therefore is not a creator therefore God is uncreated and is at the summit.
God is unique: if there were two different gods (at the summit), then either their will is different, then either each god applies his will (as they are gods it applies to the whole universe (not erased god)) then it is impossible (if their will is different at the same point),seeing the universe as it is without defect, and it is harmonious( else:if the different will of each god at a same point applies we then have a form of contradiction, from which we have the same will (contraposition)) and If one of the two gods imposes his will on the other, then the other is weak and therefore is no longer a god (contradiction), so their will coincides on everything, so it means that one flatters (strokes) the other, so it makes the ego-heart feel a weakness of this god in its power, so is no longer a god, so there is only one god, or again: if the two gods have their will which coincides in every point ,then they constitute a god of their union but God being at the top (the ideal), an indivisible god who creates, possesses and administers everything by himself is more impressive than several gods together, hence God is unique in every case. This reasoning applies even if there is a universe we do not know, because God (worshipful) must act everywhere otherwise he is no longer a god.
2-existence of God:
There is an administrator for the universe:any example:a palace hyper organized in decorations,arrangements,household,if you are told:this palace does not have a butler(administrator),you will answer:it is not possible that it happens by itself without anybody,your distinctive healthy reason rejects it (you are not crazy),therefore all the more so (a fortiori): (organization much, much better than the palace) all the organization and harmony of nature and the universe make you reject that there is no administrator for the whole universe (we can already say that it is unique, the cycles and others are the mark of the same author, for example nike is the mark of a single manufacturer, example of all the atoms of the universe same process therefore same mark therefore same author), so there is an administrator for the whole universe, and even it is obliged to think that otherwise it is chaos,. ..and many many other examples like the ship without a captain,... there is a creator of the universe: You see a humanoid walking around and you're told no one created him. You're not crazy. Your reason will reject that.So a fortiori,all the more so Your good reason will reject that man has no creator.So There is a creator of the universe, and so on throughout creation, but again the whole universe has the same mark (like nike), so the same author, so the creator is unique and the administration of his creation is the same (layout, arrangement of the way of creating) so the creator is the administrator. As He is unique, He is the great owner of the universe, and He is the one who makes the rules of the universe (such as the instructions of the electrical appliances (operation, maintenance), so it has been proved that the universe has one Lord (the Creator, the owner and the administrator) and He is the only one who deserves to be worshipped, so He is the only God. Otherwise, as God the Creator is at the top, He is also the owner and the administrator. All this is the domain of the reasonable and if you come out of it you are no longer in the reasonable (chaos).
Conclusion: Divine existence and oneness are then demonstrated by reason, but reason does not say everything that God wants from us, hence the prophets and messengers.
3- Application: The verse of the Qur'an that says that there is no god except Allah means that there is no one worthy of worship except Allah, so it means that there is no imperfection on any face, so the Qur'an, its word, has no imperfection since it is one of its characteristics and therefore one face of its perfection, Therefore, by the perfection of the Qur'an (read it in Arabic to see this reality and its explanation) and the uniqueness of the true (you must respect the rules of this book if you are honest) you must take the best interpretation of the verses and the Sunnah (path) of the Prophet (the Qur'an calls to follow the Prophet therefore apply his hadiths (hadiths=words in Arabic) and you must reconcile between the verses (of the Qur'an) and the verses, and verses/hadiths hadiths/hadiths (authentic) because the truth is quite unique and the best sought after is perfection (so correct yours intentions), for example the thief the penalty starts at 1/4 gold dinar, it costs (recently) 39€ for its weight in gold whereas a meal costs 5€, source: the pious predecessors (rule: the Koran says to follow the prophet and the prophet spoke of the first three generations which are the best and he said (ask your heart for clarification), and Allah calls in the Koran to the good and known between the good people (conciliation), etc,. .go on with the rest of the rules of Islam if you are honest (seek the best, perfection, truth, conciliation).
There are rules in Islam and if you don't follow them you find imperfections (which reflect your bad intention), while when you correct your intention you find perfection (it exists, scholars communicate it to each other, I have been reading books about Islam in Arabic for a long time, I testify and I testify that this perfection exists. Why don't you take it if it is possible and the rules of Islam are to take it, hence your attacks are unfounded since this is not what God and his prophet mean (i.e : your words that it is imperfection). ..
Did the caliphs destroy statues in cities they took control of?
accounting to this logic . I must started to destroy mosques and islamic things . Thanks for your explanation
Go on then. I bet u don't despite the logic. 🐔
JAZAKALLAH
It took years to build them and seconds to destroy them. Keeping aside the religious beliefs, at least one should acknowledge the hard work they did long ago without sufficient technology. Religion should be constructive not the other way around.
*Muhammad Nabina Vocals Only No Music With Lyrics - Hamada Helal حمادة هلال - محمد نبينا*
th-cam.com/video/dzZUAsmWxrM/w-d-xo.html
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
די סטאנציע געפינט מען מערסטנס אביעקט פון די גרעסטע אין אפריקע און די אנדערע זייט איז עס געווארן דער ערשטער העלפט רויז אין סעפטעמבער און אפילו אין די אנדערע צוויי מענטשן פון די סטאנציע געפינט זיל באטייליקט די סטאנציע איז אין די גרעסטע שטאט אין אפריקע איז עס געווארן דער רובֿ مي في كل مرة ان اكون الشخص في العالم مشهور في كل مرة كنت مع اعز في كل شيء جيد جدا حيث كل شيء في حياتنا مو كل مكان من المور الجيدة ل اأحب الشهرة كل شيء جميل في الصور في الجوار كل شي من البيت و سيكون في الجوار كل مكان
Ma Sha Allah
THE DIDNT DESTROY IT FOR ISLAM..THEY DESTROYED HUNDREDS OF SAME LIKE PLACES TO LOOT.. ....if it was unislamic ...Ghorids Empire..Ghaznavid Empire.. Ahmad Shah Baba etc etc would have destroy it..whom were known to do such acts.....
then the demolished of babari masjid in india was not wrong according to zakir naik ??
Correct
Hadalka ilaahay wax ka wanaagsani ma jiro
Hadaba ku baro kuna xifdi muddo kooban
Hadii aad u bahantahy inaad ka faa,ideysto wakhtiga ilaahy ku siiya ku soo biir group whatsApp kan chat.whatsapp.com/FuJpTRHyr056nS0y9zeIP3
Muslims educating BUDDHISTS...
IN WHICH BUDDHISTS SCRIPTURES IT'S WRITTEN THAT NOT TO BUILD STATUES FOR BUDDHA???
Yes that's right. State ur sources pls.
بارک اللہ فیک یا استاذ
And thus it was islamic and pious to destroy Babari structure
The opulent bungalows give way to smaller dwellings. The towns no longer look prosperous, though the paddy fields, the coconut groves and the fruit orchards look productive enough. A careful look at the creased faces of the people reveal the decades of hardships and humiliation, despondency and acute discrimination, bloodshed and banishment.
The countryside, once littered with bodies, now tells the heart-rending tales of broken families and lives, of torture and deaths and of a genocide that few outside the country know about. Fewer still know about the Taliban-like destruction of Hindu temples by the Sri Lankan army and Sinhalese Buddhist mobs, especially during the 26-year-old war between the Tamil militants and the Sri Lankan government forces.
According to Sri Lanka’s Department of Hindu Religious and Cultural Affairs, 1,479 temples were destroyed in eight war-affected districts of the country’s northern and eastern provinces between 1983 and 1990. But that, say many, is a conservative estimate and the actual number of temples damaged and desecrated by the Sri Lankan armed forces till the end of the war would number around 10,000. While some are being restored, most are still in ruins and a few have even been converted into Buddhist viharas and temples.
Jaffna town itself has some small temples which are in ruins. Sri Lanka’s armed forces did exactly what the Taliban did to the Bamiyan Buddhas in March 2001 - they fired mortar shells at the temples, blew off their roofs and relented only after the garbha griha (or sanctum sanctorum) of the temples stood completely damaged. Not content with that, they destroyed the idols in the temples and desecrated the places of worship. While the world condemned the Taliban, the Lankan army’s abominations went largely unreported.
Large swathes of the northern and eastern provinces are still pockmarked by remnants of the war - shelled-out houses and temples, devastated families living in squalid refugee camps, a large presence of Lankan armed forces, fear writ large on the visages of a beaten people. Many areas are still out of bounds for civilians. Even in areas “released” by the armed forces, the forces occupy the best private houses that they rebuilt after they had destroyed them. The owners of the houses do not dare lay claim over their properties
I do not agree with Dr zahir naik on this Topic he is just student nit a mufti aleem or high islamic scholar islam and hadith clearly mentioned not to harm other religion sentiments even in the time of hazrat Usman and other sahabas where they spread Islam and came to Afghanistan and other countries they didn't destroyed Buddha's and other religions temple
This argument is giving the RSS a free pass to destroy all mosque in India. If this happens, please thank Dr. Naik for his contribution.
Sr apse bt ho skti ha kuch btana ha apko or kuch poochna ha Allah insan Islam alquran☑☑☑☑☑💯
الله يرحم والديك
Mashallah
Peace
Dr. Zakir Salaam, Just because you are on a stage it does not mean you should talk about any topic. Sir, to anyone who knows Taliban you just embarrassed yourself. You tried to justify their terroristic actions by giving it a Islamic cover.
You should be ashamed of yourself by calling the Taliban the Afghan government. Taliban has and are still killing more Muslims than any non muslim forces in Afghanistan.
You praised a terrorist group and justified their actions as the government of Afghanistan. It is true that Taliban took control of most of Afghanistan via war and force not election but they were only recognized as Afghan government by three terroirst sponsor countries such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and UAE.
Remember sir, we all have to answer to Allah one day. How are you going to justify Taliban's actions to the Afghan orphans, widows, mothers, and fathers that have lost and or still loosing their innocent loved ones? How are you going to justify Taliban's actions to Allah?
You spoke about the Taliban as if they were the legitimate government of Afghanistan and as if they committed an Islamic act. By doing so you legitimized all of their actions since a government is the legitimate establishment of a country. You need to apologize to the Afghan people and ask Allah for forgiveness.
99% of Afghan have been muslims for well over a 1000 years and most are practicing muslims. They did not need to wait for Taliban to destroy the buddha statues. Furthermore, when the sahaba kiram brought Islam to Afghanistan they could have destroyed the statues if the statues would have harmed the muslim faith.
Therefore, there is no justification in Islam about destroying the buddha statues unless you know more the the first generation of Sahabas.
Finally, sir it is these types of talks that has confused the uma because our scholars want to show off and protect their egos and most of them have turned the religion into their full time business for the wrong reasons. Sometimes in order to protect their business they have to save face.
Please do not get me wrong. I respect your over all religious knowledge. I appreciate your hard work and apologize in advance if I have miss spoke but we all need to be careful and speak only on subjects that we have knowledge of. Islam is a very simple religion and the lines between right and wrong is very clear. Whoever tries to blur the lines looses face. This video is extremely offensive to Afghans. I hope it is either taken down or supported by your new video apologizing to Afghans and the muslim uma as it is a misleading video.
Excellent answer !!
Who made u the censorship police. Stop crying about statues in comments
According to this guy's same logic its okay to destroy mosques in a christian country because its their countries property like taliban did with bhamian😂
Go on then, do it. After all, you've got logic on ur side.
Bhagwan Buddha came before Jesus and Mohammad and very high level of knowledge and you can’t understand
They distroy it for jealous because they wonder the talent of ancient buddhist ,hindu artists which gave life to rock.
Jealous 🤣🤣🤣😭😭
Loads of love from India ❤️❤️
I am Hazara from Afghanistan, Bamiyan and it was part of our history like Qurans for Arabs. His words are very poor and that's why people started burning Qurans. Do not respect other religion and others do not yours. Very very poor.... I can happily live with any religion.
SANATAN DHARAM ME 4 SAWAL KIYE MENE ARYA GURUO SE ..
1 BRAMHA APNI BETI SARAWATI PE MOHIT HOGAYE ..FIR SARASWATI CHIPI JAKE UNIVERCE ME..
2. KRISHN KO RASIYA OR AIYYASH VARNAN AYA H ..
3. SHIV LING ISILIYE KATA THA KYUKI SHIV NE ..SABHU KA ROOP LEKE USKI BIWI SE BALATKAR KIYA TO SADHU NE USE SHARP DE DIYA THA .
4. RAM NE 6 SAL KI SITA SE SHADI KI OR SITA RAM KO SHRAP DEKE MARGAYI .RAM NE DALIT RISHI SABOOK KI HATYA KI.TO RAM MAHAPURUSH KESE
TO BOLNE LAGE SANATAN DHARAM KI KITABE BIGADI JA CHUKI H .. OR BHAGWANO KO AIYYASH OR ASHLIL BATAYA GAYA H..
TO AB SAWAL YE BANTA H BIGADI GAYI KITABO SE MANA GAYA DHARAM SAHI KESE HUA AMAL SAHI KESE HUE MANYATAE SAHI KESE HUI..
YAHI BIGDI HUI KITABE TO INKE MANDIRO ME POOJA PATH KE KAAM AATI H ...
ABTAK KOI SAHI JAWAB NAHI DE PAYA
Рус: Комментарий может помочь в продвижении данного видео, и в зависимости от намерения будет награда.
Чеч: Хьан комментарий бахьан оьттан хIара видео нахан ган мег, тIаккха хьан нияте хьаьжжан хьун мел а хир бу Дал мукълахь.
🙏 With great respect to All Sides , we mortal humans can't even compared with Angels , much less to Gods , Goddesses or the Enlightened Beings! Humans should know their puny place in the Universe , humans should Not Play God! We must respect others' way of praying to the God , just like we like others to respect our Holy Ka'abah in Mekkah! ... True disciples of True God should meditate & pray to True God for guidances , instead of following & listening to politically motivated people whom only know how to used & exploited us! True God sees & knows Everything! 🕯🌏
اللهم صل علی محمد و علی آل محمد
So what about the morality and respects for other humans believe and history.
It’s an absolute insult to many billions of human and their believes.
Religious property dose not belong to the state.
Taliban was never owned afghanistan nor recognised by other communities in the world as a state.???
It’s clear you have extreme heart and feeling.
You clearly support and recognize taliban.
Ali J. He isn't supporting neither disrespecting.
I like you DR. ZAKIR NAIK ❤
Assalamualaikum