Prithvi Raj defeated Mohd Ghori 16 times and on every occasion Mohd Ghori prayed Prithvi Raj for pardon and Prithvi Raj let him go. Many soldiers of Prithvi Raj must have become martyrs in these 16 battles. Only once PritviRaj was defeated, on 17th battle by Mohd Ghori and then there was no action replay. Pruthviraj was killed brutally by Ghori and Ghori made footware from his skin and wore it with pride. Sanyogita was reportedly let in the hands of men from jungles who raped her repeatedly before dying miserably. The story that Prithviraj killed Ghori despite being blinded is a pure myth. Even if it is assumed that the said story is true, still , it can be said that he was , at the most, a good sharp shooter but certainly not a responsible king who did not respect blood of his own soldiers. After his defeat, India was ruled by Muslims for next 800 years. No need to eulogize this irresponsible king. The real Hindu King was Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Maharana Pratap who really deserves eulogies..
If Ram puniyani said something it must be fake.. Even without listening him I m confirm about it.. He's a crypto-islamic.. We need to recognize these people..
History is not clear . But one thing is certain, Islamic invaders did it to spread Islam. 8 cr hindus were killed. Persia, Egypt were unislamic, now they are Islamic. This is also history
बहुत ही शानदार और संतुलित आधार पर चर्चा की गई है। मुकेश सर और पुनियानि सर आप दोनों के इस कार्यक्रम से बहुत ही सच्चा इतिहास जानने को मिलता है।आप दोनों का बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद।
उन्ही राजाओं की प्रशंसा की जानी चाहिए, जिन्होंने अपने राज्य में संस्कृति का विकास किया, लोक हित के कार्य जैसे अच्छा प्रशासन, सुदृढ न्याय व्यवस्था , बावड़ियों जलश्रोतों का विकास , आम जनमानस के जीवन स्तर को कितना ऊँचा किया । बाकी 90 % सामंत भोग विलास का जीवन जीते थे गरीबों के खून पसीने की कमाई से । कपोल काल्पनिक कहानियों से भरा पड़ा है इतिहास, जो तर्कहीन, विज्ञान विहीन हैं ।
How many kings built schools where children of all Varnas could study together and teachers from all Varnas were teaching. How many hospitals were built where people of all Varnas could be treated and the doctors of all Varnas were involved. Same with roads, wells, temples, public transportation etc.......by "these so called great rulers"?
@@jhakkuagadhi842 please mention any of them. The story of Eklavya and Dronacharya is in front of us. When did social reformation begin in present physical India, and by whom...
@@samstollan13 हा अंधभक्त ... भाई पृथ्वी गोल होती हे ..चपटी नही 😅😅😅 कही पर लिखा हे चपटी हे तो मान नही लेते आप जैसे ....इतिहास देख लो ...और बेहतर होगा आप अपनी उपाधी हमे ना दे ... "अंधभक्त "
@@saurabhparmar97 bandar. sooraj nigal Leta hai ek aadmi ka 10 sar ek aurat khet jotne se. ek admi kheer khaane se. Paisa hua ek haathi ki. chooha sawari. 😅😅😅😅 ye kis kitaab me hai ??????
आपके जैसे और पुनियानी जैसे समृद्ध इतिहास कारों को मेरा हार्दिक नमन और आभार। आप से ,ऐसे ही आमजनता को जागरूक करने वाले विषयों को लेकर खुले दिल से व्याख्यान करने कराने के वीडियो बनाने की उम्मीद करते हैं।
कनाडा की नागरिकता के मोहताज जिन्होंने 10विन कक्षा तक की इतिहास की किताब पढ़ने की ज़रूरत नहीं समझी, जिन्हें सम्राट और राजा के बीच का फर्क नहीं पता वो इतिहास पर फ़िल्म बना रहे हैं और आज के राजा लोग उसे देख कर प्रसन्न हो रहे हैं। इससे अच्छा मज़ाक क्या होगा?
मुकेश कुमार जी, आप बहुत अच्छा प्रोग्राम करते हो इंडियन हिस्ट्री पर. अगर एक प्रोग्राम महाराजा सूरजमल पर भी बन जाता तो बहुत अच्छा होता. आप प्रोग्राम फैक्ट पर बनाते हो. धन्यावाद
@@rationalhuman3557 सूरजमल ने सुझाव दिय थे, कि कैसे नॉर्थ भारत में सर्दियों में युद्ध करना है, मराठों को बोला था कि अपनी पत्नियों को युद्ध के समय में भरतपुर भेज दो, और भी बहुत कुछ. पर मराठों ने उसका अपमान किया. राजस्थान के दूसरे राजा तो पहले से अलग हो गए थे उनके उप्पर कोई सवाल नहीं करते. मराठों में बहुत over confidence हो गया था. इसीलिए हार गए. कोई jaeda दिन नहीं चली था युद्ध. युद्ध के बाद मराठों सेना का इलाज भी सूरजमल ने ही किया था, जो बच गए थे, और उनको सुरक्षित उनके घर तक पहुंचाया था.
@Sudeep Ohlayan ,,,,,,, magar history ke sources se pata lagta hai ki surajmal ki demaand thi marathao se ki delhi ki satta use mile ,,,,,,,,,maratha is baat se sehmat nahi the ,,,,,
@@rationalhuman3557 हर राजा की इच्छा होती है कि उसका राज्य बढ़े. अगर मराठा जीत जाते तो वो सही होते पर वो हार गए. बहुत बुरी हार हुई थी. इसका मतलब वो इतने तैयार नहीं थे, अगर मान लेते सूरजमल की बात क्या पता भारत का भविष्य कुछ और होता. 99% sources को counter check करना चाहिए. डॉ Ram Puniyani जी इस विषय पर कोई answer दे सकते हैं. उनको इतिहास की अच्छी जानकारी है.
@@rationalhuman3557 ओ भाई जरा पढ़ के आओ मराठाओं ने हिंदुओं पर कितना कर्जा प्रति वर्ष मांगा था अरे आधी रियासते बर्बाद हो गयी थी कर्ज की वजह से तो कोई भी हिंदू क्यों साथ देता मराठों का में राजपूत हु पर मैं महाराजा सूरजमल जाट के बारे में एक भी उपसब्द नहीं सुन सकता हिंदुओं पर अत्याचार किये थे लगान के नाम पर मराठों ने एक बार जरूर पढ़ो भाई राजस्थान और मराठों के बारे में फिर अपने आप समझ जाओगे क्यों कोई राजा मदद करने नहीं आया
इन वामपंथियों ने सारा इतिहास उल्टा पुल्टा पढ़ाया । इनके लिए महोमद गौरी महान औरंगजेब महान अकबर महान जिन्होंने हिंदुओ को मुसलमान बनाया , जो आज मुस्लिम ठेकेदार है वो सब पहले हिंदु थे ।
Ek bar bhi zikr nhi kar sakte ye unka qki alah Udal khand mai khud kai bar aya hai ki prithviraj shabd bhedi ban chalate the.. fir inhe kehna padega ki dekhiye Alha Udal khand bhi jhootha hai aur prithviraj raso bhi. bas inke al masir sahi hai jis mai toh ye chutiyapa tk likha hai ki Chishti aya hindustan, prithviraj ko shraap diya blah blah.. jiska zikr aur kahin nahi milta. Fictional inka ye poora nazariya hai history ko todh marodkar muslims ko mahaan batane ka aur hamare mahan Hindu rajaon ko neecha dikhane ka. Q koi khud ka dimag nahi lagata bas sab inke behkave mai a jate hain
@@jaisinghkhangarot6774 bhaiya ji ye sab batein karna ab toh chordh do Tum sab. Ahir ya rajput. Jo bhi ladhta hai.. woh ek khsatriya hai. Veer bhogya vasundhra ko bhool gaye kya
During the times of Prithviraj Chauhan, there was no concept of a nation-state. There was no India. It was a vast geographical region that was ruled by numerous independent kingdoms. He was a regional ruler based in Ajmer who ruled over areas that were adjacent to Ajmer. So when he fought against Muhammed Ghori, he was NOT fighting to save Hindus or India; instead, he was trying to SAVE his own kingdom. He was not a capable ruler either, as after winning the first battle against Ghori, he did not pursue them and let them march back to Afghanistan. Moreover, against the advice of his own officials, he did not prepare his army for the possibility of Ghori coming again with better force. Finally, he also had bitter disputes with other Hindu rulers. All these factors led to his defeat and ultimately to his demise.
Ya . But many thing you forget. 1 His love for his empire (or dynasty) 2he made many mistakes. But he is still a great King . Because he stood as a bulwark against Muhammad Ghori till his heroic death.3 He was a born solider and courageous and fearless warrior . He has one fo fearless warrior in Indian history .
हमारे हिंदी राज्यों में, आल्हा गया जाता था। जिसमे दो भाईयों, आल्हा और उदल की बहादूरी के किस्से हैं। येह बुंदेलखंड और पृथ्वीराज से संभंदित् हैं। आप इस पर कुछ तथ्य बताएं। शुक्रिया
बचपन में ,, आल्हा ऊदल पर लिखी गई पोथी थी जो वर्षा काल में बहुदा सुनाई देती थी ,,कानौं में मनमोहक वातावरण प्रस्तुति ,, आल्हा ऊदल बड़े,,लड़ईय्या जिनकी मार सही ना जाये ,,,,,, आश्चर्य है वो हिन्दू मानस संस्कृति सुहावना समय सब समाप्त हो गया , कोई उसपर टीका टिप्पणी करने पर भी नहीं सोचता ,, आल्हा ऊदल सम्बंधित पुस्तकों का प्रकाशन , पाठ्यक्रम सब समाप्त हो गया ,,, आल्हा ऊदल ,, पृथ्वीराज प्रसंस्करण किसी हिन्दू को ज्ञात नहीं ,,अब हिन्दूओं को केवल औरंगजेब का ही ज्ञान दिया जा रहा ,,
अजीब तरीका आपका इतिहास बताने का, जब शब्द भेदी बाण की बात आये तो चन्द्र बरदायी ने कल्पना कर के लिखा है लेकिन जब संयोगिता की बात आये तो चन्द्र बरदायी का चित्रण सही है?
Prithviraj Chauhan gave a tough fight to Momd Ghauri seems to an accepted historical fact in this programme. Also that he expanded his kingdom from Ajmer to Delhi in between defeating several princely states in modern Rajasthan and adjoining areas and that there were two Hindu rulers of his contemporary times, who aligned with Ghauri to fight him and that Raja Jaichand was opposed to Samrat Priviraj Chauhan and also the episode of Sanyongita...and that Chandbardai wrote this 12th Century saga in 16th Century mostly as glorified character of Prithviraj Chauhan , his fight with Ghauri, Jaichand and romance with Samyogita....but the question is why Chandbardai chose Prithviraj as his protogonist and not Jaichand or any other his contemporary ruler for his poetic work unless there was something special or great about him remembered by the masses even after more than three hundred years after his reign and that he got so inspired to write a great poetic work on him to seek acceptance for it among masses...just because many Indian rulers in pre Sultanate period didn't have that professional practice of writing history and anecdotes , Chronicles of their times in a very organized manner by the professional writers, we cannot completely ignore the Indian tradition of ballads , charans which may identified with much later traditions of kissagoes, through which great stories were kept alive among people.....so please don't completely disown the efforts which are aiming to look at history with another/ different perspective just because the founder of this platforn nurture a political ideology...balance is and objectivity is required from those who practiced journalism...thank you..
Dear Srivastva ji, After the death of Samrat Harshavardhan , the Manuvadi forces created and supported smaller kingdoms for their vested interests. From Samrat Bimbisar to Samrat Ashok and upto Samrat Harshavardhan, Buddhism was the main religion. The brahmanical forces got a chance of spreading their religion after the death of Harshavardhan in 647 CE. They supported a bunch of newly anointed rulers who in their turn agreed to follow and promote Brahmanvadi religion. Later on, some of these rulers were christened as Rajputs. It may be noted here that from Bimbisar in 6th century BCE to Harshavardhan in 7th century CE, none of the kings was a Kshatriya or Rajput in the brahmanical sense. In 16th century, the Brahmins realised that although they eulogised and propagated the Kshatriyas as Kings in their scriptures yet in recorded history, none of the rulers was from a Kshatriya clan as defined by them. Hence , they started calling the rulers propelled by them during 700 CEto 1200 CE as Rajput or neo Kshatriya. In order to establish this they chose Prithviraj as their one of the hero and wrote an imaginary story of his valour and romance in Prithviraj Raso. The Delhi rulers of the time were ignored due to being secular and patronising Jains and Buddhist equally. The Raso author even got the Delhi rulers, the Tomaras dethroned by Prithviraj Chauhan whereas upto 1192, they were the sovereign kings. It was the Tomar king Chahad Pal Tomar who faced the Mohammed Ghauri in both the battles of Tarrain in 1191 and 1192. There is a seminal book written by Harihar Niwas Dwivedi of Gawaliar Dilli Ke Tomar, available on internet in PDF form free of cost . You wii find the answers to your queries in the said book in detail and authoritatively. Regards.
सत्य हिन्दी को तो अक्षय कुमार से ही इतनी नफरत लग रही है वैसे भी इन समाज सेवी जी कई जगह मेरी शंका है ,मेरी शंका है शब्द उपयोग किया है तो उन्की बातों पर हमे भी शंका है अच्छे इतिहास कारों को आगे आकर शंका समाधान करना चाहिये
This is a correct interpretation. What Chand Vardai has written is largely fictional. What Malik Muhammad Jaiysi wrote in Padmawat is largely fictional. We must rely more on historical records in the form of books, coins, inscriptions etcetera.
@@CreditCounseller Ofcourse I love my civilization. Prithviraj Chauhan, Rana Sanga, Rana Pratap, Shivaji, Guru Govind Singh, Maharaja Ranjeet Singh and Jhansi Ki Rani were the bravest Indian warrioles. Every Indian must respect them. Howver we must be objective in our history.
@@jayantanag7736 Sir absolutely they were. But unfortunately in our country political parties are using them as per their religious vote bank. I fear someday they will change our history book as well. 😔
Maan lo Tumare pass 2 histry book hai ek me asambhab impossible baate likha ho aur dusre pe normal baate Likha ho to Normal wali book real mana jayega Bharat me to maximum Granth farzi likha gaya hai urankhotola, astra sasta ye sab reality me nhi hota
Dimag main dahi jama hua hai Chand Bardai unka dost tha woh to marr gaya thana to Marne wala kaise likh sakta hai uska bhoot aaya tha kya likhne chal ye bata?
Charan tribe singing near a fort in Rajasthan,told this story.after few years of war,Chand bardai got to know that samrat is in ghazni prison,he went there.n than sultan gyasuddin was killed by samrat with shabdbhedi baan.shahabuddin ghoris elder brother gyasuddin ghori was sultan.
Pirthivraj Chouhan Died in 1192 Ajmer,Muhammad of Ghor (मोहम्मद ग़ोरी) Full name: Shihab ad-Din Assassinated by jat's khokher on 15 March 1206, Dhamiak, Kot Dhamiak, Pakistan, Dhamiak, Pakistan Buried: 10 April 1206, Dhamiak, Kot Dhamiak, Pakistan! Jat's revolt against Ghori!
Ram punyani is a very biased, leftist and communist person. He keeps on just presenting one side simultaneously hiding the other side. He is very sympathetic about Mughals and Turks while very critical and harsh towards Hindu kings.
Disagree , जो एतिहासिक साक्ष्य है पृथ्वीराज रासो , उसको नकार रहे है पुनिया साहब , तो इनकी बोली हुई कहानी का आधार क्या है , यह तो बस सभी एतिहासिक तथ्यों को नकार रहे है बस .... सुनकर दुख हुआ की पुनिया साहब क्या इतिहास ही बदल रहे है
पृथिवीराज की कहानी नहीं वास्तविकता है। आपके और पुनियानी द्वारा परोसे जाना वाला सत्य, दरअसल हिंदू राजाओं को कमतर और मुस्लिम राजाओं को महान दिखाने के एजेंडा है।
Prathvi and Jai Chand was mosre bhai.Prathvi faught with Alha Udal and Malkhan .Prathvi Raj Chauhan defeated from vanafers.There was no any development in his rule.
Prathviraj Chauhan was never defeated except second battle of tarain, he even defeated Chandel - Banaphar's and appointed his general Pajawan as governor of Mahoba Also there is no such relation between Prathviraj and Jaichand, there is no contemporary proof of that
Charan tribe singing near a fort in Rajasthan,told this story.after few years of war,Chand bardai got to know that samrat is in ghazni prison,he went there.n than sultan gyasuddin was killed by samrat with shabdbhedi baan.shahabuddin ghoris elder brother gyasuddin ghori was sultan.
आदरणीय मुकेश जी एवं पुनियानी साहब, सादर प्रणाम। चंदबरदाई रचित पुस्तक पृथ्वीराजरासो को आदिकाल अर्थात वीरगाथा काल की रचना मानी जाती है जिसे हम हिंदी साहित्य के इतिहास की पुस्तकों में देख सकते हैं। ऐसे में यह कहना की पृथ्वीराजरासो सोलहवीं सदी में लिखा गया, तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही नही प्रतीत होता है। इतिहासकारों का एक वर्ग पृथ्वीराज चौहान की हार और उनकी मृत्यु का विवरण तराइन की दूसरी लड़ाई (1192) के बाद देते हैं जिसमे तर्क भी सही प्रतीत होते हैं। चंदबरदाई की पृथ्वीराजरासो में कुछ अंश बाद में भी जोड़े गए आगे के वर्षों में, क्योंकि उस पुस्तक में वाक्य विन्यास और बिंब रचना से समझा जा सकता है। बॉलीवुड समाज के हिसाब से सिनेमा बना रहा है। आप दोनों का धन्यवाद। सत्य हिंदी का सब एपिसोड देखा है मैंने। पुनः धन्यवाद।
Ram puniya is completely wrong ,Prithivraj defeated mohmed gori 17 times . Ist battle of tarien 108 Raja were along with pirthivi raj and in 2nd battle of tarien jaychand suceeded to seperate 44 kings from pirthivi raj and also bought his two army commanders (1) Pertap Singh and one other not remember. It is true he killed gori by arrow (2) and kutbuddin killed by subhark the horse of king of mevad Rawal Keran Singh . Ram puniya is a vampanthi , Romila Thaper type historian and he speak through the references of muslim historian. The true history with true evidences were kept in Nalanda and dhyai din ka jhopra Vikramshila unversity in Ajmer Rajasthan and these universities were brunt by muslims and all true history books with true incidents were brunt by muslims invaders so that the next generations of Bharat compell to read only muslim refercences and never aware about the truth and make faith on fake history whiich is based on muslim references and written by muslim , vampanthi ,and congress mentality historians
Dusri bat tu jis subhrak ghode ( horse 🐎) ki bat kara raha hai vo mewad ke raja karan singh-1 ke bare unki death 1168 me hui thi jabki kutubuddin ki death 1210 me 😂😂😂 Phir ye WhatsApp University ka gyan kaha se prapt kiya bete😂😂
The way the narrative generated it appears that we are still living in Mugal era and suffering badly under Muslim rulers atrocities. It's a wake-up call that united we stand and all religions are equal in every aspect. Our strength lies in diversity
Hope all citizens like you understand because every day there is no peace but war. They want to make the democratic country into dictator rule so everyday new muddas. Ppl are diverted mean while the actual plans are executed while they manipulate citizens with news. The muddas are only for communal disputes by these devils. They enjoy the luxury and citizens suffer the bloodshed. Taj Mahal is in seven wonders of the world, lucknow historical name, coins are with historical marks and so on… citizens are diverted for these reasons.
Don't try to teach false history to glorify the Muslim rulers who left no stone unturned to destroy everything Hindu or sanatan .14 hundred years of Muslim history is known to the whole world.
Aap bol rahe hai ki prithviraj raso jo ki ek poetry hai ki rachna 16th century me Chandbardai ne ki par Wikipedia ke hisaab se Chandbardai ka dehavasan 1200 esvi me ho gaya tha. Toh kya bhoot ne iski rachna ki. Kripya prakash daale Puniyani ji
Ram puniyani humne bhi aapke lecture attend kiye hai, history me aap left wing hai sir, agar aap rajasthan jaye to har gaon me es veer ki kahani hai 🙏❤️
Ye Islam ka prachar kar rahe hai. Arab se paisa aata hai bhai.. usko puchho. Delhi (Indraprastha ) ek bhi purana mandir kiyun nenhi. Mughal itne achhe the to Pandav logo ka mandir kanha gaya ?
Ek din ye budhau ye bhi sabit kr dega ki nalanda university ko harshvardhan ne jalaya tha ... Muslim bachane aaye the ... Baad me badnam unhi ko badnam kiya gya ...
Actor Prithvi Raj played Akbar in Iconic movie Mugul-e-Azam powerfully with unfogetting impact on audience,even now....has Akshay kumar really done justice to the royal character of PRC with incredible acting n powerful dialogue delivery., it is questionable?,he surely falls short of that high calibre of acting, parallels needs to be made..
Yes mukesh ji u r right, this type of history given in ncert ancient history but current generation is mostly in andhbhakti... If you want to know history go to Historical prospect rather being struck in WhatsApp University and Facebook etc. be rationale history is history we need to focus on future but current situation is very pathetic Rampant unemployment, Soaring poverty, Mounting Inflation, Education and Health etc...
यही तो गद्दार जैचंद वाली सोच है अगर राजपूत वीर नही होते तो इस देश में आज भी मुगलो का राज होता आप जैसे लोग ही माँ भारती के सपूतो का और माँ भारती का अपमान कर रहे हो हमे गर्व है की हम ऐसी महान शक्तियों की संतान है जय राजपुताना 🚩🚩
@@Rajesh_singh_manhas bolne ka ek tarika hota hai agar hum tumhari sab sacchayi batane Lage fir mirchi lagti hein reference ke sath jawab milta hai fir tum jalte ho.
@@Rajesh_singh_manhas Jinko aaz tak apna itihas nhi pta chala oh Kuran ky Bary me bolne ka haq rakhty hain kya Nupur Sharma Ko puchhlo 4 veed me se kitna giyan hai use apne Dharam ky Bary kya pta hai usko jinko Hindustan ki hindi nhi aai azztak samajh me oh Hume Arab ki Arabi sikhengy Humne kab tumhary Dharam guruon Ko gali di ya Bura kaha tumhara Dharam tumhe Mubarak ho Hara Islam hame Mubarak Dharmik Wahi hai jo apne burai Ko khatam Kary naki dusron me burai nikale or apna khabar nhi
Coins depicting two kings on its two sides speaks volumes about the relation between the two. Imagination of a poet can not be called history, just like Anarkali is a Imagination of a writer made into a famous movie.
@@deepaksawlani5516 ghanta. Most of them were flawed when seen through lens of Islam Many of them enjoyed women and wine and never cared for their subjects
राम पुनियानी जी की बात अवश्य हिन्दू धर्माधों की आस्था पर चोट करेगी इतिहास हमेशा इन बातों से बेपरवाह अपनी चाल चलता रहता है, चाहे भाजपा हो या कोई निक्कर धारी
सर मैंने जहां तक इतिहास को सुना है पृथ्वीराज और राजा जयचंद सौतेले भाई थे राजा जयचंद की पुत्री संयोगिता पृथ्वीराज की कुछ रिश्ते में लगती है तो फिर पृथ्वी राज चौहान कैसे संयोगिता को भगा ले जाएगा बात कुछ समझ में नहीं आती है
Prithvi Raj Chauhan was great . But Hindus are great for criticising Hindus.
Stop being blind followers start reading
Prithvi Raj defeated Mohd Ghori 16 times and on every occasion Mohd Ghori prayed Prithvi Raj for pardon and Prithvi Raj let him go. Many soldiers of Prithvi Raj must have become martyrs in these 16 battles. Only once PritviRaj was defeated, on 17th battle by Mohd Ghori and then there was no action replay. Pruthviraj was killed brutally by Ghori and Ghori made footware from his skin and wore it with pride. Sanyogita was reportedly let in the hands of men from jungles who raped her repeatedly before dying miserably.
The story that Prithviraj killed Ghori despite being blinded is a pure myth. Even if it is assumed that the said story is true, still , it can be said that he was , at the most, a good sharp shooter but certainly not a responsible king who did not respect blood of his own soldiers. After his defeat, India was ruled by Muslims for next 800 years.
No need to eulogize this irresponsible king.
The real Hindu King was Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Maharana Pratap who really deserves eulogies..
If Ram puniyani said something it must be fake.. Even without listening him I m confirm about it.. He's a crypto-islamic.. We need to recognize these people..
History is not clear . But one thing is certain, Islamic invaders did it to spread Islam. 8 cr hindus were killed. Persia, Egypt were unislamic, now they are Islamic. This is also history
महाराजा रणजीत सिंह ..... एक लोकप्रिय और साहसी दूरदर्शी राजा थे ..... जिनके यहां अंग्रेज भी नौकरी करते थे ....🤷
Well said
बहुत ही शानदार और संतुलित आधार पर चर्चा की गई है। मुकेश सर और पुनियानि सर आप दोनों के इस कार्यक्रम से बहुत ही सच्चा इतिहास जानने को मिलता है।आप दोनों का बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद।
महान तो वहीं हो सकता है जो अपने प्रजा का ख्याल रखता हो ।
और साथ ही महान राजा वह भी होता है जो अपने देश की सीमा को सुरक्षित रखता है...
सम्राट अशोक
शिवाजी महाराज
Samrat Prithvi Raj Chauhan aur Maharana Pratap ye mahan Raja the
Isiliy rajput hmesa mahan the kbhi bhi rajasthan jake puchlo aam logo se
उन्ही राजाओं की प्रशंसा की जानी चाहिए, जिन्होंने अपने राज्य में संस्कृति का विकास किया, लोक हित के कार्य जैसे अच्छा प्रशासन, सुदृढ न्याय व्यवस्था , बावड़ियों जलश्रोतों का विकास , आम जनमानस के जीवन स्तर को कितना ऊँचा किया ।
बाकी 90 % सामंत भोग विलास का जीवन जीते थे गरीबों के खून पसीने की कमाई से ।
कपोल काल्पनिक कहानियों से भरा पड़ा है इतिहास, जो तर्कहीन, विज्ञान विहीन हैं ।
सराहनीय टिप्पणी है आपकी👍🙏
🙏🏼🙏🏼👌🏻
How many kings built schools where children of all Varnas could study together and teachers from all Varnas were teaching. How many hospitals were built where people of all Varnas could be treated and the doctors of all Varnas were involved. Same with roads, wells, temples, public transportation etc.......by "these so called great rulers"?
@@thankskads6215 Very few. Whatever they did it was more to consolidate their kindom.
@@jhakkuagadhi842 please mention any of them. The story of Eklavya and Dronacharya is in front of us. When did social reformation begin in present physical India, and by whom...
पृथ्वीराज चौहान के वक्त हिंदू नाम का कुछ था ये इस पर संदेह है ...
नहीं था
आप जैसे लोग ..कीतना भी जोर लगा लो .... साचा इतिहास साचा हि रहेंगा ... जय भारत ...जय सम्राट पृथ्वीराज चौहान
Bhai jise tum sach man kr baithe ho tumhe kese pata ki wo hi sach hai
Aa गया andhbhgt,😜😜😜😜
@@samstollan13 हा अंधभक्त ... भाई पृथ्वी गोल होती हे ..चपटी नही 😅😅😅
कही पर लिखा हे चपटी हे तो मान नही लेते आप जैसे ....इतिहास देख लो ...और बेहतर होगा आप अपनी उपाधी हमे ना दे ...
"अंधभक्त "
@@hiteshjijotiya2083 यही प्रश्न हमने आप से पूछा तो ... आप क्या कहेंगे ...
@@saurabhparmar97 bandar. sooraj nigal Leta hai
ek aadmi ka 10 sar
ek aurat khet jotne se. ek admi kheer khaane se. Paisa hua
ek haathi ki. chooha sawari. 😅😅😅😅 ye kis kitaab me hai ??????
आपके जैसे और पुनियानी जैसे समृद्ध इतिहास कारों को मेरा हार्दिक नमन और आभार। आप से ,ऐसे ही आमजनता को जागरूक करने वाले विषयों को लेकर खुले दिल से व्याख्यान करने कराने के वीडियो बनाने की उम्मीद करते हैं।
In dono ki funding kaha se hoti vo bhi puchhiye ji🙏
Punyani ji koi itihaskar nahi hai. Itihas ko galat tarike se pesh karne me mahir hai yah
बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएं प्रभु श्री राम पुनियानी जी आप हमेशा सत्य से रू-ब-रू करवाते रहे
इतिहास की सच्चाई को दरकिनार कर उसे आज की सांप्रदायिकता की राजनीति का रंग दिया जा रहा है । यह सारी कवायद बीजेपी को चुनाव जिताने की है।
Jab kabhi sach bhaher nikl ker aata hain to Mahan log BJP ki sajis batane lag jate hain
चारण,भाट इनाम,इकराम पाने के लिए बढ़ा चढ़ाकर गुणगान किया गया है और कुछ नहीं
Ha andekaar ka bhi
कनाडा की नागरिकता के मोहताज जिन्होंने 10विन कक्षा तक की इतिहास की किताब पढ़ने की ज़रूरत नहीं समझी, जिन्हें सम्राट और राजा के बीच का फर्क नहीं पता वो इतिहास पर फ़िल्म बना रहे हैं और आज के राजा लोग उसे देख कर प्रसन्न हो रहे हैं। इससे अच्छा मज़ाक क्या होगा?
ऐतिहासिक तथ्य ये है कि राजा जयचंद ने पृथ्वी राज चौहान और मोहम्मद गौरी के बीच तराइन के दूसरे युद्ध में गौरी का साथ बिल्कुल भी नहीं दिया था।
Respected Mukesh sb. and Dr. Saheb you are great.
मुकेश कुमार जी, आप बहुत अच्छा प्रोग्राम करते हो इंडियन हिस्ट्री पर. अगर एक प्रोग्राम महाराजा सूरजमल पर भी बन जाता तो बहुत अच्छा होता. आप प्रोग्राम फैक्ट पर बनाते हो. धन्यावाद
@@rationalhuman3557 सूरजमल ने सुझाव दिय थे, कि कैसे नॉर्थ भारत में सर्दियों में युद्ध करना है, मराठों को बोला था कि अपनी पत्नियों को युद्ध के समय में भरतपुर भेज दो, और भी बहुत कुछ. पर मराठों ने उसका अपमान किया. राजस्थान के दूसरे राजा तो पहले से अलग हो गए थे उनके उप्पर कोई सवाल नहीं करते. मराठों में बहुत over confidence हो गया था. इसीलिए हार गए. कोई jaeda दिन नहीं चली था युद्ध. युद्ध के बाद मराठों सेना का इलाज भी सूरजमल ने ही किया था, जो बच गए थे, और उनको सुरक्षित उनके घर तक पहुंचाया था.
@Sudeep Ohlayan ,,,,,,, magar history ke sources se pata lagta hai ki surajmal ki demaand thi marathao se ki delhi ki satta use mile ,,,,,,,,,maratha is baat se sehmat nahi the ,,,,,
@@rationalhuman3557 हर राजा की इच्छा होती है कि उसका राज्य बढ़े. अगर मराठा जीत जाते तो वो सही होते पर वो हार गए. बहुत बुरी हार हुई थी. इसका मतलब वो इतने तैयार नहीं थे, अगर मान लेते सूरजमल की बात क्या पता भारत का भविष्य कुछ और होता. 99% sources को counter check करना चाहिए. डॉ Ram Puniyani जी इस विषय पर कोई answer दे सकते हैं. उनको इतिहास की अच्छी जानकारी है.
@@rationalhuman3557 ओ भाई जरा पढ़ के आओ मराठाओं ने हिंदुओं पर कितना कर्जा प्रति वर्ष मांगा था अरे आधी रियासते बर्बाद हो गयी थी कर्ज की वजह से तो कोई भी हिंदू क्यों साथ देता मराठों का में राजपूत हु पर मैं महाराजा सूरजमल जाट के बारे में एक भी उपसब्द नहीं सुन सकता हिंदुओं पर अत्याचार किये थे लगान के नाम पर मराठों ने एक बार जरूर पढ़ो भाई राजस्थान और मराठों के बारे में फिर अपने आप समझ जाओगे क्यों कोई राजा मदद करने नहीं आया
💗
इन वामपंथियों ने सारा इतिहास उल्टा पुल्टा पढ़ाया ।
इनके लिए महोमद गौरी महान औरंगजेब महान अकबर महान जिन्होंने हिंदुओ को मुसलमान बनाया , जो आज मुस्लिम ठेकेदार है वो सब पहले हिंदु थे ।
Hi
मेरा सत्य हिंदी से अनुरोध है कि,
कृपया वीर अहीर आल्हा उदल के बारे में भी सच का सामना में कहानी दिखाएं
Ek bar bhi zikr nhi kar sakte ye unka qki alah Udal khand mai khud kai bar aya hai ki prithviraj shabd bhedi ban chalate the.. fir inhe kehna padega ki dekhiye Alha Udal khand bhi jhootha hai aur prithviraj raso bhi. bas inke al masir sahi hai jis mai toh ye chutiyapa tk likha hai ki Chishti aya hindustan, prithviraj ko shraap diya blah blah.. jiska zikr aur kahin nahi milta. Fictional inka ye poora nazariya hai history ko todh marodkar muslims ko mahaan batane ka aur hamare mahan Hindu rajaon ko neecha dikhane ka. Q koi khud ka dimag nahi lagata bas sab inke behkave mai a jate hain
Nhi dikhyenge kyuki kuta us k liye hi bhonkta hai jo usko tukda dalta hai
Alha Udal Ahir kbse hogye vo to rajput tai
जय वीर अहीर आल्हा उधल 🙏
@@jaisinghkhangarot6774 bhaiya ji ye sab batein karna ab toh chordh do Tum sab. Ahir ya rajput. Jo bhi ladhta hai.. woh ek khsatriya hai. Veer bhogya vasundhra ko bhool gaye kya
बहुत बढ़िया टोपक है इतिहास का धन्यवाद मुकेश भाई
अलबरूनी ने पृथ्वीराज चौहान नहीं बल्कि अनंगपाल का वर्णन किया है,और कहा है कि महमूद से लड़ने वाला एकमात्र राजा था, जयचंद का कोई चरित्र नहीं
Bhai vo ghaznavi ke time hua tha 😂
Btw ghaznavi aur ghori dono alag alag hai 😂
During the times of Prithviraj Chauhan, there was no concept of a nation-state. There was no India. It was a vast geographical region that was ruled by numerous independent kingdoms. He was a regional ruler based in Ajmer who ruled over areas that were adjacent to Ajmer. So when he fought against Muhammed Ghori, he was NOT fighting to save Hindus or India; instead, he was trying to SAVE his own kingdom.
He was not a capable ruler either, as after winning the first battle against Ghori, he did not pursue them and let them march back to Afghanistan. Moreover, against the advice of his own officials, he did not prepare his army for the possibility of Ghori coming again with better force. Finally, he also had bitter disputes with other Hindu rulers. All these factors led to his defeat and ultimately to his demise.
True...he was a regional king like 2 or 3 states...he had not large area or large army
Dispassionate post- mortem par excellence.
Ya . But many thing you forget. 1 His love for his empire (or dynasty) 2he made many mistakes. But he is still a great King . Because he stood as a bulwark against Muhammad Ghori till his heroic death.3 He was a born solider and courageous and fearless warrior . He has one fo fearless warrior in Indian history .
At that time rajputs were brave it was jaichand, prithvi raj
@@studywithrajat3270 bro ghori was not a born soldier he was defeated by woman when he invaded Gujarat
मुकेश जी और पुनियानी,, सर 🙏🙏
ऐतिहासिक तथ्यों को सामने रखने के
लिए बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद 🙏🙏 सत्य हिन्दी 👍
हमारे हिंदी राज्यों में, आल्हा गया जाता था। जिसमे दो भाईयों, आल्हा और उदल की बहादूरी के किस्से हैं। येह बुंदेलखंड और पृथ्वीराज से संभंदित् हैं। आप इस पर कुछ तथ्य बताएं।
शुक्रिया
बनाफर वंश के राजपूत सेनापति थे।
जो चंदेल राजपूत थे उनके यहां
बचपन में ,, आल्हा ऊदल पर लिखी गई पोथी थी जो वर्षा काल में बहुदा सुनाई देती थी ,,कानौं में मनमोहक वातावरण प्रस्तुति ,,
आल्हा ऊदल बड़े,,लड़ईय्या जिनकी मार सही ना जाये ,,,,,, आश्चर्य है वो हिन्दू मानस संस्कृति सुहावना समय सब समाप्त हो गया , कोई उसपर टीका टिप्पणी करने पर भी नहीं सोचता ,, आल्हा ऊदल सम्बंधित पुस्तकों का प्रकाशन , पाठ्यक्रम सब समाप्त हो गया ,,, आल्हा ऊदल ,, पृथ्वीराज प्रसंस्करण किसी हिन्दू को ज्ञात नहीं ,,अब हिन्दूओं को केवल औरंगजेब का ही ज्ञान दिया जा रहा ,,
Rasput nahi the, ahir vansh se the
Rajput Raja ke ghar per Unki Shiksha hui thi
लगता है जयचंद अभिभी मरा नहीं हैं.. वह जहा जहा से भी गुजरा होगा उसने अपना खून छोड ही दिया.. वरणा इतणे वर्शो बाद बडे प्यारसे तुष्टीकरण क्यो?..
Mukesh Kumar, ye hindu dharm ka durdaivya hai ki aap jaise log humare Dharm me paida huye.....
Best research by far on Prithviraj is by Virendra Singh Rathore. I urge the viewers to read his book or see his presentation.
किताब का नाम?
The best book is Prithvi raj raso
माना हम हिन्दू खराब है लेकिन मुस्लिम इज़राइल,फ्रांस, अमेरिका में क्यों धर्म के प्रति हिंसा करते हैं??
😅😅 couldn't stop laughing when the host mentioned about Akshays intelligence.
Akhchay ne to sb badal dala,, histry man bn jayega ab,,,
अजीब तरीका आपका इतिहास बताने का, जब शब्द भेदी बाण की बात आये तो चन्द्र बरदायी ने कल्पना कर के लिखा है लेकिन जब संयोगिता की बात आये तो चन्द्र बरदायी का चित्रण सही है?
Prithviraj Chauhan gave a tough fight to Momd Ghauri seems to an accepted historical fact in this programme. Also that he expanded his kingdom from Ajmer to Delhi in between defeating several princely states in modern Rajasthan and adjoining areas and that there were two Hindu rulers of his contemporary times, who aligned with Ghauri to fight him and that Raja Jaichand was opposed to Samrat Priviraj Chauhan and also the episode of Sanyongita...and that Chandbardai wrote this 12th Century saga in 16th Century mostly as glorified character of Prithviraj Chauhan , his fight with Ghauri, Jaichand and romance with Samyogita....but the question is why Chandbardai chose Prithviraj as his protogonist and not Jaichand or any other his contemporary ruler for his poetic work unless there was something special or great about him remembered by the masses even after more than three hundred years after his reign and that he got so inspired to write a great poetic work on him to seek acceptance for it among masses...just because many Indian rulers in pre Sultanate period didn't have that professional practice of writing history and anecdotes , Chronicles of their times in a very organized manner by the professional writers, we cannot completely ignore the Indian tradition of ballads , charans which may identified with much later traditions of kissagoes, through which great stories were kept alive among people.....so please don't completely disown the efforts which are aiming to look at history with another/ different perspective just because the founder of this platforn nurture a political ideology...balance is and objectivity is required from those who practiced journalism...thank you..
Dear Srivastva ji, After the death of Samrat Harshavardhan , the Manuvadi forces created and supported smaller kingdoms for their vested interests. From Samrat Bimbisar to Samrat Ashok and upto Samrat Harshavardhan, Buddhism was the main religion. The brahmanical forces got a chance of spreading their religion after the death of Harshavardhan in 647 CE. They supported a bunch of newly anointed rulers who in their turn agreed to follow and promote Brahmanvadi religion. Later on, some of these rulers were christened as Rajputs. It may be noted here that from Bimbisar in 6th century BCE to Harshavardhan in 7th century CE, none of the kings was a Kshatriya or Rajput in the brahmanical sense. In 16th century, the Brahmins realised that although they eulogised and propagated the Kshatriyas as Kings in their scriptures yet in recorded history, none of the rulers was from a Kshatriya clan as defined by them. Hence , they started calling the rulers propelled by them during 700 CEto 1200 CE as Rajput or neo Kshatriya. In order to establish this they chose Prithviraj as their one of the hero and wrote an imaginary story of his valour and romance in Prithviraj Raso. The Delhi rulers of the time were ignored due to being secular and patronising Jains and Buddhist equally. The Raso author even got the Delhi rulers, the Tomaras dethroned by Prithviraj Chauhan whereas upto 1192, they were the sovereign kings. It was the Tomar king Chahad Pal Tomar who faced the Mohammed Ghauri in both the battles of Tarrain in 1191 and 1192. There is a seminal book written by Harihar Niwas Dwivedi of Gawaliar Dilli Ke Tomar, available on internet in PDF form free of cost . You wii find the answers to your queries in the said book in detail and authoritatively. Regards.
पृथ्वीराज का हमने पढाई की है पर
पृथ्वीराज चौहान एक गदा इसम था
महमद गौरी द बेस्ट लिटर है
सत्य हिन्दी को तो अक्षय कुमार से ही इतनी नफरत लग रही है वैसे भी इन समाज सेवी जी कई जगह मेरी शंका है ,मेरी शंका है शब्द उपयोग किया है तो उन्की बातों पर हमे भी शंका है
अच्छे इतिहास कारों को आगे आकर शंका समाधान करना चाहिये
महान स्वयम्भू इतिहासकार मनोज मुन्तशिर और सुधीर चौधरी से आप सबको इतिहास के बारे मे सीख लेना चाहिए ।
This is a correct interpretation. What Chand Vardai has written is largely fictional. What Malik Muhammad Jaiysi wrote in Padmawat is largely fictional. We must rely more on historical records in the form of books, coins, inscriptions etcetera.
Do you love your civilisation,? Do you think Ghouri was a brutal invader?
@@CreditCounseller Ofcourse I love my civilization. Prithviraj Chauhan, Rana Sanga, Rana Pratap, Shivaji, Guru Govind Singh, Maharaja Ranjeet Singh and Jhansi Ki Rani were the bravest Indian warrioles. Every Indian must respect them. Howver we must be objective in our history.
@@rebasingh258 ,,, 😂😂 aren't Md Akbar Jahangir Tipu sultan Haidar ali Indian
@@jayantanag7736 I did not understand uour question.
@@jayantanag7736 Sir absolutely they were. But unfortunately in our country political parties are using them as per their religious vote bank. I fear someday they will change our history book as well. 😔
बहुत ही सारगर्भित जानकारी... धन्यवाद मुकेश जी एवं पुनियानी जी..। 🙏
यह फिल्म मात्र एक काल्पनिक कविता का चित्रण है जोवास्तविक इतिहास से भिन्न है ।
मुग़ल इतिहासकार लिखेगा तो हम उनकी सारी बात मानेंगे पर हमारा कोई कवि लिखेगा तो हम कभी नही मानेंगे।
करेक्ट
Bhai ek dam sahi baat boli tumne
आप ने बिल्कुल ठीक कहा
Maan lo Tumare pass 2 histry book hai ek me asambhab impossible baate likha ho aur dusre pe normal baate Likha ho to Normal wali book real mana jayega
Bharat me to maximum Granth farzi likha gaya hai urankhotola, astra sasta ye sab reality me nhi hota
Dimag main dahi jama hua hai Chand Bardai unka dost tha woh to marr gaya thana to Marne wala kaise likh sakta hai uska bhoot aaya tha kya likhne chal ye bata?
आप दोनों महान इतिहास कार प्रतीत होते हैं कृपया अपने अपने परिवार के बारे में भी पता करे शायद किसी राजपरिवार से जुड़ जाए.
@@adv.kirankumarsingh7134 ye converted hai
एक दिन ये बुढ़ऊ ये भी सिद्ध कर देगा कि नालंदा तक्षशिला जो भी यही के राजाओं ने और फुट में जला दिया और सोमनाथ और बाकी मंदिर भी यही के लोगों ने गिराए
Charan tribe singing near a fort in Rajasthan,told this story.after few years of war,Chand bardai got to know that samrat is in ghazni prison,he went there.n than sultan gyasuddin was killed by samrat with shabdbhedi baan.shahabuddin ghoris elder brother gyasuddin ghori was sultan.
Sad Reality of India is that they can't even praise their own Brothers and Sisters
Pirthivraj Chouhan Died in 1192 Ajmer,Muhammad of Ghor (मोहम्मद ग़ोरी) Full name: Shihab ad-Din
Assassinated by jat's khokher on 15 March 1206, Dhamiak, Kot Dhamiak, Pakistan, Dhamiak, Pakistan
Buried: 10 April 1206, Dhamiak, Kot Dhamiak, Pakistan! Jat's revolt against Ghori!
मुकेश जी की नजर में आमिर खान,सलमान खान और शाहरूख खान का बौद्धिक स्तर जरूर ऊँचा होगा। 🤔😃😎
बहुत ही महत्वपूर्ण तथ्य बताए सर। आपको सादर नमन।🙏
क्षत्रियपति शिवा जी महाराज पर भी फिल्म बननी चाहिए।
very good information sir ji
Prathviraj chouhan great hindu king.
क्षत्रिय राजपुत्रस्यो सम्राट पृथ्वीराज चौहान
राजपूत सम्राट पृथ्वीराज चौहान की जय🙏⚔️🚩
May be
Ram punyani is a very biased, leftist and communist person. He keeps on just presenting one side simultaneously hiding the other side. He is very sympathetic about Mughals and Turks while very critical and harsh towards Hindu kings.
I am totally agree with your statement. He just so biased. Just keep telling the good things about mughlas.
मैंने आपकी वीडियो देखी मुझे जो लगा मैंने cumments ke द्वारा कह दिया
🇮🇳🇮🇳
Ram Puniyani always eager to destroy the brave history of Hindu community
He always appreciate Muslim dynasties
Kal ko tum Ye b kahdoge ki angrezone bharath me hukumat nahi ki . 😐
History kabhi change nahi hogi chase kitne b films panne badal do
Itne hi mahan the Hindu Raja tu 600+200 saal q pitte rahe
Kal jaichand ek thaa - aaj jaichand bahut hain👹👺👿😈
Vo sach bolta hai, islye kadva hai
@Jonty Mol tukde tukde gang hamesha abusive hota hai - kyonki sach se vaasta nahi hota - what a shame
Punani ji is great scholar.
पदमा खांन और जौद्धा बानों के नाम सें ही अंधभख्त भङक जातें हैं 😂😂
क्यों लम्पट मोहमद ने 6 की आयशा को चोदा इसपर तुम अंधनामाज़ी को बुरा क्यों लगता है
Randi Ayesha aur lampat Muhammad ke naam se chamche bhrak jate hai 😑 😅
😀😀😀😀😀
@@rejakulahmed8858Hata atannakwaadi
😂😂😂😂
Ajeeb baat hai 2400saal pahle lagbhag. Samrat Ashok kaa itihaas spasht hai.. Par 800 pahle ka prithviraj ka itihaas spasht nhi hai... Saajeesho ke badal se satya kaa surya nhi chuptaa..
Ha too bata bete koi avidance hai 😂😂 iska
🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🌹🌹👍👍Babar, Humaayun, Aurangzeb, Ahmad shah Abdaali ,Nadir shah, Meer Quasim, Jaisey Mahaan dayalu, daanveer, kings k baarey mein aap logon k kya khayaal hein Jaichandon🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🌹🌹👍👍Aapko aur Ram punyaani ko acchey sey pahchaan chuka hoon🌷🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🌹🌹👍👍
Thanks a lot❤❤🙏🙏
Sach sach hota hai...Hindu ya muslim nahi
@ Yash Shrivastav aapke pehchanne se itihas nahi badal jayega wo to wahi rahega Jo hai.
टिप्पणीकारों से एक विनति है राष्ट्रभाषा हिन्दी का ही प्रयोग करें।
इतिहास में जाना अंधेरों में भटकने जैसा है इसमें सत्तीय की प्राप्ति 5% भी मुश्किल है
Dr Saab …हमेशा स्वस्थ रहो ..🌹🇮🇳🇮🇳👍
मैं एक Sports Man हु । पिछले 3 yaa 4 साल से आपको सुनता हूँ ।
इतिहास आप से सुनकर एक समझ बन ने लगी है ।
शुक्रिया 🙏 🙏
Dr.Mukesh Kumar Sir and Ram Puniyani Sir thanks a lot for bringing such topic and for clarifying the truth with historical facts 👍
Akshay kumar ne sahi kaha ki mughal history history books mein maximum hoti hain hindu kam
पृथ्वीराज वाले विषय पर तो लग रहा था पुनियानि जी को कम पता था और मुकेश जी को ज़्यादा जानकारी थी...
😁😁👍
ये दोनों रट कर आये थे । historian my foot
Your saying about Akshay Kumar is 1000% right
Puniyani himself doesn't claim he is a Historian
But for SATYA HINDI he is a Historian 😂
Actually he is electrical engineer.
Tere ko itihas ki zarurat nahi he
Tu akshay ko dekh le , bohot he tere liye
@@Islaamhuq Tu pehel aake ek Chawal Bori collect karle Dihadi
Uske baad tu Apna Yessu Yessu comedy show mein naachle
@@Islaamhuq Kyu bey gasdu Punyani ko bol ne sei tereko kuch ho raha Hai.
@@Islaamhuq 😃
Mai aaj tak Prithviraj Chauhan ko Raj Kapoor ka father samajhta tha 😢
Allah Ram Puniani ko lambi umr de. Yese sakhs bahot kam milte hai jo sahi history batate hai.
Jo tumara liya sahi bola unha Allah sahi rakha jo na bola unhe 72 hura na mila ,🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why to believe that your version of history is right???? You have your opinions.
जय गुर्जर सम्राट पृथ्वीराज चौहान
😜
@@king11in 😩😩😩😩😩😩😩🥸🥸🤣🤣🤣🤣🤩
Jai Mohammad gauri
जै गोबर सम्राट
Porf . Ram
Jai Chand Punainey
Read Indian history by Dr Iswari Prasad to clarify yourselves.
Disagree , जो एतिहासिक साक्ष्य है पृथ्वीराज रासो , उसको नकार रहे है पुनिया साहब , तो इनकी बोली हुई कहानी का आधार क्या है , यह तो बस सभी एतिहासिक तथ्यों को नकार रहे है बस .... सुनकर दुख हुआ की पुनिया साहब क्या इतिहास ही बदल रहे है
पत्रकार महोदय भी अपमान जनक बाते कर रहे है एक भारतीय गौरव सम्राट पृथ्वीराज चौहान के बारे में
Aap ki her baat sacchi hoti hai salute u and puniyani saheb
पृथिवीराज की कहानी नहीं वास्तविकता है। आपके और पुनियानी द्वारा परोसे जाना वाला सत्य, दरअसल हिंदू राजाओं को कमतर और मुस्लिम राजाओं को महान दिखाने के एजेंडा है।
Kal ek jaichand thaa aur aaj bahut jaichand hain 😈👹
Prathvi and Jai Chand was mosre bhai.Prathvi faught with Alha Udal and Malkhan .Prathvi Raj Chauhan defeated from vanafers.There was no any development in his rule.
Prithviraj 3 was a king of a small kingdom not an emperor like chandragupta, ashoka, samudragupta, akbar..
1990 मे कश्मिरी पंडित ओंको भागाया यह भी साच या गलत फहमी है यह भी एक बार बाताई ए
Prathviraj Chauhan was never defeated except second battle of tarain, he even defeated Chandel - Banaphar's and appointed his general Pajawan as governor of Mahoba
Also there is no such relation between Prathviraj and Jaichand, there is no contemporary proof of that
Abe kaha padh ke aaye ho Yar dono mosere Bhai the,jaichand kannoj ka raja or prithvi Raj Rajasthan ka.yar kaha se late ho ye jhantu facts🤣🤣🤣
Charan tribe singing near a fort in Rajasthan,told this story.after few years of war,Chand bardai got to know that samrat is in ghazni prison,he went there.n than sultan gyasuddin was killed by samrat with shabdbhedi baan.shahabuddin ghoris elder brother gyasuddin ghori was sultan.
"अक्षय कुमार पर की गई व्यक्तिगत टिप्पणी बड़ी कुरुचिपूर्ण लगी ।
❤❤❤ sahi baat uthai bhai aapne, sach kya h, Pata hona chahiye 🎉🎉🎉congrats bhai good video
Sir you are great 👍
आदरणीय मुकेश जी एवं पुनियानी साहब, सादर प्रणाम। चंदबरदाई रचित पुस्तक पृथ्वीराजरासो को आदिकाल अर्थात वीरगाथा काल की रचना मानी जाती है जिसे हम हिंदी साहित्य के इतिहास की पुस्तकों में देख सकते हैं। ऐसे में यह कहना की पृथ्वीराजरासो सोलहवीं सदी में लिखा गया, तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही नही प्रतीत होता है। इतिहासकारों का एक वर्ग पृथ्वीराज चौहान की हार और उनकी मृत्यु का विवरण तराइन की दूसरी लड़ाई (1192) के बाद देते हैं जिसमे तर्क भी सही प्रतीत होते हैं। चंदबरदाई की पृथ्वीराजरासो में कुछ अंश बाद में भी जोड़े गए आगे के वर्षों में, क्योंकि उस पुस्तक में वाक्य विन्यास और बिंब रचना से समझा जा सकता है। बॉलीवुड समाज के हिसाब से सिनेमा बना रहा है। आप दोनों का धन्यवाद। सत्य हिंदी का सब एपिसोड देखा है मैंने। पुनः धन्यवाद।
Apne bhaut hi acchi history ki jaankari di hai👍
तो क्या "एर्तुगल आफ गाजी "सही है ??जिसमें इस्लाम धर्म न मानने पर लोग का सिर काटना दिखाया गया??
Ram puniya is completely wrong ,Prithivraj defeated mohmed gori 17 times . Ist battle of tarien 108 Raja were along with pirthivi raj and in 2nd battle of tarien jaychand suceeded to seperate 44 kings from pirthivi raj and also bought his two army commanders (1) Pertap Singh and one other not remember. It is true he killed gori by arrow (2) and kutbuddin killed by subhark the horse of king of mevad Rawal Keran Singh .
Ram puniya is a vampanthi , Romila Thaper type historian and he speak through the references of muslim historian.
The true history with true evidences were kept in Nalanda and dhyai din ka jhopra Vikramshila unversity in Ajmer Rajasthan and these universities were brunt by muslims and all true history books with true incidents were brunt by muslims invaders so that the next generations of Bharat compell to read only muslim refercences and never aware about the truth and make faith on fake history whiich is based on muslim references and written by muslim , vampanthi ,and congress mentality historians
Ram Puniya is someone who is more dangerous than the invaders.
Ram puniya is clearly true
@@gebriallogisticslogistics5668 ۱۰۰%
Dude konse 17 yudh hue jara nam bata 😂😂😂
Dusri bat tu jis subhrak ghode ( horse 🐎) ki bat kara raha hai vo mewad ke raja karan singh-1 ke bare unki death 1168 me hui thi jabki kutubuddin ki death 1210 me 😂😂😂
Phir ye WhatsApp University ka gyan kaha se prapt kiya bete😂😂
Ram puniya ji namaskar apke Jo sachi history bolte hai bahut acha lagata hai
The way the narrative generated it appears that we are still living in Mugal era and suffering badly under Muslim rulers atrocities. It's a wake-up call that united we stand and all religions are equal in every aspect. Our strength lies in diversity
You are absolutely right.
Strength lies in unity, what unites us? Cast division magnifying by these fake seculars
Hope all citizens like you understand because every day there is no peace but war. They want to make the democratic country into dictator rule so everyday new muddas. Ppl are diverted mean while the actual plans are executed while they manipulate citizens with news. The muddas are only for communal disputes by these devils. They enjoy the luxury and citizens suffer the bloodshed. Taj Mahal is in seven wonders of the world, lucknow historical name, coins are with historical marks and so on… citizens are diverted for these reasons.
Very good video I laik vedeo Thanku you Sir Anil Kumar mishra Giaatganj Raisen Mp
Don't try to teach false history to glorify the Muslim rulers who left no stone unturned to destroy everything Hindu or sanatan .14 hundred years of Muslim history is known to the whole world.
बहुत अच्छी जानकारी है।
Aap bol rahe hai ki prithviraj raso jo ki ek poetry hai ki rachna 16th century me Chandbardai ne ki par Wikipedia ke hisaab se Chandbardai ka dehavasan 1200 esvi me ho gaya tha. Toh kya bhoot ne iski rachna ki. Kripya prakash daale Puniyani ji
Samrat Prithviraj Chouhan Was great & brave king of Asia
Ram puniyani humne bhi aapke lecture attend kiye hai, history me aap left wing hai sir, agar aap rajasthan jaye to har gaon me es veer ki kahani hai 🙏❤️
Ye Islam ka prachar kar rahe hai. Arab se paisa aata hai bhai.. usko puchho. Delhi (Indraprastha ) ek bhi purana mandir kiyun nenhi. Mughal itne achhe the to Pandav logo ka mandir kanha gaya ?
Ek din ye budhau ye bhi sabit kr dega ki nalanda university ko harshvardhan ne jalaya tha ... Muslim bachane aaye the ... Baad me badnam unhi ko badnam kiya gya ...
Actor Prithvi Raj played Akbar in Iconic movie Mugul-e-Azam powerfully with unfogetting impact on audience,even now....has Akshay kumar really done justice to the royal character of PRC with incredible acting n powerful dialogue delivery., it is questionable?,he surely falls short of that high calibre of acting, parallels needs to be made..
Superb👍 it's a most knowledgeable topic
Yes mukesh ji u r right, this type of history given in ncert ancient history but current generation is mostly in andhbhakti... If you want to know history go to Historical prospect rather being struck in WhatsApp University and Facebook etc. be rationale history is history we need to focus on future but current situation is very pathetic Rampant unemployment, Soaring poverty, Mounting Inflation, Education and Health etc...
यही तो गद्दार जैचंद वाली सोच है अगर राजपूत वीर नही होते तो इस देश में आज भी मुगलो का राज होता आप जैसे लोग ही माँ भारती के सपूतो का और माँ भारती का अपमान कर रहे हो
हमे गर्व है की हम ऐसी महान शक्तियों की संतान है
जय राजपुताना 🚩🚩
Sachhai ka koi dharam nahi hota sachhai khud ek dharam hai. Professor sahab sachh bolte hai isliye unki izzat sachhe log karte hai.
Tab tak hi sirf jab tak woh islam ki sacchai na bole.... Nupur sharma ne to sirf Qur'an ko quote kiya tha.... Kya hua tab?
Chandbardai ne jo prithvi raj ke bare me likha vo kalpnik tha lekin sanyogita ke bare me Jo likha vo Satya. Ye kaise ho sakta hai?
@@Rajesh_singh_manhas bolne ka ek tarika hota hai agar hum tumhari sab sacchayi batane Lage fir mirchi lagti hein reference ke sath jawab milta hai fir tum jalte ho.
@@Rajesh_singh_manhas
Jinko aaz tak apna itihas nhi pta chala oh Kuran ky Bary me bolne ka haq rakhty hain kya Nupur Sharma
Ko puchhlo 4 veed me se kitna giyan hai use apne Dharam ky Bary kya pta hai usko jinko Hindustan ki hindi nhi aai azztak samajh me oh Hume Arab ki Arabi sikhengy
Humne kab tumhary Dharam guruon Ko gali di ya Bura kaha tumhara Dharam tumhe Mubarak ho Hara Islam hame Mubarak
Dharmik Wahi hai jo apne burai Ko khatam Kary naki dusron me burai nikale or apna khabar nhi
This channel name should be -jhoot Hindi.👍👍
Coins depicting two kings on its two sides speaks volumes about the relation between the two. Imagination of a poet can not be called history, just like Anarkali is a Imagination of a writer made into a famous movie.
For Muslims Mughals were flawless,isn’t it😀😀
@@deepaksawlani5516 ghanta. Most of them were flawed when seen through lens of Islam
Many of them enjoyed women and wine and never cared for their subjects
@@deepaksawlani5516 and for you your modi ji is flawless right ? 🤡
Fine conclusion.
Professor puniyaniji to prithviraj Chouhan ko zero aur Mohammad Ghouri ko hero bana diya.
ji Satya hai wahi batayenge na? ya ab achha lagne ke liye balance kar de🤔
राम पुनियानी जी की बात अवश्य हिन्दू धर्माधों की आस्था पर चोट करेगी
इतिहास हमेशा इन बातों से बेपरवाह अपनी चाल चलता रहता है, चाहे भाजपा हो या कोई निक्कर धारी
सर मैंने जहां तक इतिहास को सुना है पृथ्वीराज और राजा जयचंद सौतेले भाई थे राजा जयचंद की पुत्री संयोगिता पृथ्वीराज की कुछ रिश्ते में लगती है तो फिर पृथ्वी राज चौहान कैसे संयोगिता को भगा ले जाएगा
बात कुछ समझ में नहीं आती है