not really. If they wanted to they should issue a M&P 10mm pistol to compete with glock 20. I think they should just stop producing the M&P 40 and 357 sig versions and just make an M&P 10mm fullsize pistol and then sell the barrels and mags for the other two. They'd make alot more money and THEN give the people what they want.
ZFlyingVLover, judging from empirical evidence, in this case first-place sales numbers for the M&P, I'd say Smith & Wesson is doing quite well. Marketing a niche caliber like the 10mm exclusively, and then making the consumer buy additional parts to assemble a .40 S&W or .357 Sig pistol, however, is not a viable strategy. Which is likely why S&W doesn't do it.
@@ZFlyingVLover u 10mm guys always crack me up. So u think Smith should "stop Making 40 s&w and 357 sig". ok I could see your logic. Smith should just make the 10mm. wait what??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I agree. The only possible thing I could ask for in the shield is reversible mag release for us lefties. Yeah I can use a little manipulation but for the #1 selling CCW I feel like it should’ve always been there.
@@amineaitsadiq69 academy sports is having a sale starting tomorrow with $50 rebate and $50 academy gift card the price comes out to $229 before tax and fees.
Excellent review, I have a Shield in 9mm w/o thumb safety, I really like the pistol and was curious as to what the 2.0 offered and you did a great job explaining it. However, I wouldn't trade my original for the newer offering. Thanks.
As somebody who very recently purchased the Shield and wants to know every aspect about the gun, inside and out, this video has been extremely helpful and im very grateful to you for it! So far, wonderful gun and will most likely be my EDC at least for now
I got mine chambered in .40 a few years ago and porting it was one of the first upgrades I did. A few years later and recently, I upgraded the guide rod spring system to one by Zahal, and it actually makes it easier to rack the slide. Then I got a Crimson Trace light/laser combo that looks like a small block and is very intuitive and easy to operate. I don't think I'll upgrade the sights or the trigger. The laser will compensate for other things like managing a less-than-sastisfactory trigger. And since I can't conceal carry, a premium trigger system and sights would be overkill for home defense. Glad that I watched this video because I used to regret not waiting for the newer Shield. Not anymore.
@@HWG-wm8ld You're ignorant about me and my situation. You don't even know the additional reasons why I did upgrades to that particular gun. Not all of us have good vision and some of us may have disabilities, or we may be less agile and alert because of our age. One person is partially handicapped, so they need all the advantages they can get. There's other people in the house who would benefit from a gun with upgrades who are much older. I've already experienced an attempted home invasion by 4 ex-cons, and later two attempted burglaries. A CCW was denied to me because of politics and because I can't "donate" lots of money to the Sheriff. I would have had a chance if I was an actor, even an anti-2A one.
Once you have enough firearms.... and actually shoot them frequently..... you can start to get picky about triggers. I’m certainly guilty about it now but years ago I could care less. I always give a factory trigger on a new firearm some time before swapping it out but 9/10 times I see obvious enough accuracy improvements. Not only for myself but new shooters as well.
Been carrying the original shield 13 years in. I just can’t seem to get away from it. It’s just the perfect EDC carry gun. Near 3000 rounds over those 13 years and 1 stove pipe. And only 5 jams. This gun is a Gem. With proper cleaning after a good day at the range. It’s a workhorse that keeps on working. I did end up putting Trijicon Day and night sights and Apex 2.0N trigger with only 3.4 lb trigger pull. Also carry a diamondback DB9 in the pocket or usually on the ankle as a back up. Also a darn good gun. 2000 rounds about 10 hang ups. But some my fault. Awesome video even though old it’s a true goodie. Now subbed.
Either the original or 2.0, both are very nice sturdy pistols that you can't go wrong with. I have the original and never experienced the "gritty trigger" people talk about. My trigger is quite smooth without any mods. Its been a very solid pistol and has never misfired or jammed.
On my Shield 9mm, with the original trigger there was basically no audible or tactile reset. The trigger was just ok. I put in the Apex Duty/Carry kit and I think Apex uses the sear from the 2.0 in their kit for the Gen1 Shield because the trigger on your 2.0 seams to be exactly like mine with the Apex kit, minus the Apex return spring (explanation below). Originally with the stock set up I was getting 6.2lbs. I installed the full kit and even though the trigger felt better, it actually made the pull weight heavier at 6.6lbs. I did some reading online and the S&W return spring was lighter so I reinstalled it and now I get 5.5lbs and the trigger is perfect. Not to heavy, not to light, very crisp, audible/tactile reset that is decent (could be a little better as it's just a bit soft). But fantastic over all for a striker fired gun. If you have a Gen1 Shield and don't want to trade it for the 2.0 just upgrade the trigger and your good. IMO
$579 is the MSRP with Tritium night sites, the base model is $479. With INTEGRATED CRIMSON TRACE® RED LASER the MSRP is $499... Great video!! Thank you for making it and sharing it!
Got a M&P 45 Shield with the Performance Center upgrades about 2 weeks ago As a left handed shooter, I have no problem with the magazine release. My left hand index finger hits it quickly & nicely. Now, locking the slide back isn't as smooth yet. All in all, I'm very happy with this weapon. Size, fit, accuracy, all acceptable for what it's designed for.
@@macross7kI bought the original about 2 years ago and have been very happy with it. I see no reason to upgrade to the 2.0. I was looking for a pocketable 9mm and first bought the Kahr cm9. What a mistake! Failures to feed, trigger guard too small which tore up my trigger finger, take down was a real pain. The shield fits in the same desantis nemesis holster I got for the kahr. I added the magguts +2 kit to the 7 round mag, giving me 9+1. The magguts baseplate adds just enough length to allow me to get a full three finger grip while still able to conceal in the pocket. I cannot conceal the 8 round mag in the pocket. The shield has been 100% reliable. Definitely a big s and w fan, I sometimes carry the m and p bodyguard .380 and it's also been problem free. Also have the m and p sport 2 ar-15. Modded it quite a bit with magpul accessories and love the rifle. Only other firearm I own is a Remington 870 magpul tactical. Covers all my bases. Knives on the other hand, are something I can't have enough of.
Will be picking up my new S&W Shield 2.0 9mm this week. Great price at $335. Wanted the Shield for better IWB concealment at 4 o'clock. I felt my .380 just wasn't enough stopping power (psychologically) and my Sig SP2022 9MM just wasn't concealable enough. I noticed many times I was printing to much. Will probably still utilize my .380 as a boot gun for backup only. Went with a BraDec IWB holster for my new Shield 2.0 we'll see how it feels and works out. Great video. Be safe and EDC
Thanks for the video. I just purchased the M&P Shield 9. I did look at the M2 and decided that it was not worth the extra cost. My local gun dealer also had the 10 round magazine in stock from pro mag that fits the pistol perfectly.
Very well explained, I enjoy how you actually explain how the firearm works. This is a strong contender for my first EDC and after this video and the comments I feel a when 1 would be best.
I own the original Shield 9mm and I am looking to get me a 2.0 9mm I've been carrying my shield 9 for years and I love it can't wait to try out the 2.0 9 Shield
This is 2024 now and I just bought a brand new M&P 45 shield, but I had to pay $500 for it. I do not regret it though, I've been carrying it for over a week now and I think I'm in love haha. It replaces a Phoenix arms hp22a which I carried on me at work since it was easily concealable but ridiculously underpowered, and I was carrying a full size Taurus PT 24/7 Pro 40 S&W when I would go to larger stores but it was very difficult to conceal. This Shield has been a dream for me already to conceal carry because I forget it's even there all day while I'm at work. 🙂
Just purchased a 2.0 for $299. They are all over GB for $500-$569. Found a place in Minnesota that has them very cheap. Just got my LTC, so watching all kinds of vids on here these days. Great video, thank you. Very happy with my purchase.
I have had 3 of the original 9mm Shields and 1 of them in 40. I have carried and practiced with the 9mm since 2014. I love this gun and the price point compared to most other guns is another reason it’s such a popular carry gun.
I bought mine back in 2015 (Gen 1) and has been [imo] one of my best firearm purchases, by far. This was a very well detailed explanation of the differences between the two models, however I [personally] prefer my Gen 1 model over the "2.0". I would also like to point out, that on my Shield®️, I have the "sharper" 9mm stamping on the barrel, opposed to what you detailed in your differences (not that it really matters! 🙄) and by it being a "California issue", mine doesn't have the topside "peephole", but a "when loaded" (red) raised indicator instead! 😉👌 Outside of that, you were spot on!..💯% #LoveMyShield!..🛡🥰
On a side note the 9mm font on the barrel probably has more to do with production date than 1.0 vs 2.0 as my original shield has the newer font. As for changes, your basically paying an extra $50 for a stipple job and a very MINOR trigger lightening. Changes are very minimal compared to the larger 2.0's. This is more like 1.2, they are the same damn gun. 2.0s are going for $429 here and regular shields $375 (except 40 cal which I guess are unpopular enough to sell for $299).
The print on the barrel is what caught my eye in the video, I looked at my 1.0 and the font is the same as the 2.0 he was shaking around, so I was wondering if the guy who had it before me switched barrels or something. It's definitely a 1.0 slide and frame.
I bought my 1.0 shield a couple months ago at academy for 329.00 I don't see anything I'm missing out on very happy with it I put a rubberized talon grip I ordered from talon gun grips that made the grip very nice got the grips for my 3 mags also
Does anybody know if Shield 1.0 mags service 2.0’s? I can’t find OEM mags anywhere for the 2.0 right now and I see what look like a lot of double stack mags available but not for the 2.0..
I own a 1. 0 shield 9mm and a .45 shield. The .45 is not called a 2.0 but it has the aggressive texture and better / lighter trigger. I shoot the .45 a little better than the 9mm due to the upgrades. But if you already own a 1.0 9mm I'm not sure its worth the extra money.
I'm putting it in rotation this winter as a pocket fire extinguisher! So many people loving the Shied, they can't be wrong! My local shop didn't have much to say good and said "the Shield is a weak handgun" !!! I laughed because they know me well (we're gun snobs) but I have complete faith in the little Shield to get it done! Thank you very much for your contribution on TH-cam! Your videos are very professional and well done.
Probably a better choice to get an original (while it was on sale) and upgrade to an apex carry duty trigger and talon grips. Would have been nice if the 2.0 had a lower rail for a light
Julie goulob did a test and the compensator didn't do much of anything... The shirt barrel is so close to rotational axis that it would take stouter or longer barrel for it to work... But u also get the trigger... I tried for one... But I'm not paying the extra money for a vented barrel that does no good... And they say u lose velocity no much but still... It's a short barrel
So if the biggest difference is the trigger then why shouldn’t I buy the v1 for $250 and add an apex trigger for like $100? That would put me way under the cost of the 2.0 which goes closer to $425ish.
@@YouWhatMate_Official The only worthwhile ergonomic upgrade to me are the fish scales on the front near the muzzle. I hate the aggressive grip texture honestly. I prefer the original's much more.
If I had the original Shield, I would not bother to upgrade, but I didn't have one. I bought the 2.0 and it's my favorite gun to shoot. The Shields are the best value of any on the market imo.
@@AxcelGamer97 I took some 100 grit (on the seems) and sanded it down some. I also did work on the beavertail and trigger area inside and out. Looks and feels nice now.
as a shield 2.0 owner, ill say this: super reliable, accurate, small, light and budget friendly gun. As far as negatives: the grip does snag on clothing pretty badly, I added the hogue over grip sleeve, and it cured any gripe I have had with the firearm. trigger is excellent for what it is, its not a 1911 or a single action revolver... capacity is adjustable with magazine extenders if you wish. overall excellent choice for edc, cc.
I recently purchased the 2.0 and I love it. I feels well balanced and is far superior to the Glock 43. My only issue is that the magazines are stiff as heck! I have to push the follower with a pen because I cannot with my thumb.
@DR Dan amen to that man. Yes, that is a good solution. After a trip to the range and about 200 rounds later, the mag springs have gotten less stiff as well as the slide stop. Guess it takes time. Also, I loaded both mags to full capacity and let them sit with the rounds for a few days and that has helped a lot. Just out of the box they are insanely difficult. I'm just glad i didn't get the mags with the springs that bend and warp inside the magazine and creates a tangled mess. But when i took apart my 8 round mag the spring looked differently from the ones that warped. Must be new from Smith and Wesson.
They are almost exactly the same. Grip texture slight change. Trigger slight change slide front serrations slight change. All in all I can change all of these on my original shield.
This is a very informative video. However, when viewing a comparison video such as this, one would expect a more side by side comparing of the two firearms. (First one then the other you miss a little) All of this information that you provided could have been easily obtained from S&W website. After watching your video, the only difference in the two that I see, is the stippling on the grip, the front slide serrations, and the 2.0 markings. Oh, of course the price difference. Maybe I missed something after 18 some odd minutes of watching...
Seems like no real differences. Glad I got another of the originals on deep discount and the rebate. Would have been helpful to note what parts are interchangeable and if the APEX upgrades are the same for both. Thank goodness S&W isn't following the path of Glock with a new version every year..... sheesh.
These are made in Massachusetts, funny thing is you can't legally buy anything without a load indicator in MA (Also must have safety switch, and 10 lbs trigger pull, lol, yes, 10 lbs!)
I have the 1.0 I bought for $225. Just got the 2.0 with integrated laser for $335. I like the idea of having a factory laser and not a bulky add on. Almost identical in every way. Triggers are exactly the same. Weight is suppose to be lighter in the 2.0 for some reason. Can’t really feel it. Finish on frame is more smooth on the 1.0 and grip is more aggressive on 2.0. Says new audible reset on 2.0 but my 1.0 sounds exactly the same. I’ve owned close to 30 carry guns and I feel the shield is the best for what it is. Now with the Plus version out I would consider that over the 1.0. Only thing I’m not crazy about is the cheap looking flat trigger it comes with. Add some Trijicon HD’s on these and your good to go
I just recently bought a used gen 1 shield. Haven't shot it yet, thanks bills for existing so I can't buy ammo lol, but it will be my carry gun for the foreseeable future
I may have missed it but did they beef up the slide rails on the 2.0 Shield like they did on the 2.0C? anyone that pays over $500 for a Shield is out of their mind. I'd buy a PPS M2 first.
The pps m2 looks like it was built from a lego set to blocky and heavy did they fix the problem with barrel penning chipped barrel problem on the pss m2 yet i wonder.
@@brucedon1951 no they didnt fix it. Bought one a week ago. It's really bad. Haven't even shot it, just racked the slide about 20 times and dry fired about 20 times and its showing the peening in 2 places
I picked up my original 9mm shield at Cabella’s with vets discount, Smith &Wesson factory rebate, tax and additional approval cost $250 out the door about 6 months ago.. It’s almost identical to my Taurus slim 709 which I’ve had for years. They both use the same holster and shoot about the same. Don’t know if I can give the edge to either one over the other. Nice gun for conceal carry.
I actually prefer the lighter weight original M&P Shield. An important point for compact guns in the first place. If you think every ounce doesn't make a difference, hold a one-ounce coin in your hand.
The shield is the only model since the 2.0 came out that i like the 1.0 better...but the full sized 2.0 is a huge improvement over the 1.0. especially the trigger..my 2.0 4.6 barrel 45 is one smooth operator!
Roadrider19119 my buddy just bought the original shield and I shot the pistol and it was dead on for me and I am not a great pistol shooter but the gun fells great in hand
This is a very nice side by side. Thanks for doing it. i got the shield 40 for 279 when the $75 rebate was going on. i carry this and I’m used to the trigger and wondered if the 2.0 was worth getting. I’m thinking now if i did anything it would be to find a gen 1 performance center model for less than the 2.0 since it has a “better” trigger than what i have now. Thanks again for the video. It helped me make up my mind.
Dont forget, you can also make your.40 shield to a 9mm just with the barrel swap, and the .40 mags will still shoot 9mm so in my opinion you get both worlds in one GREAT TOOL. God bless.
Also... The Gen 1 shield you have is a gen1.5 the very first releases literally had no tactile or audible reset. Watch colion noirs video you'll see the lack of a reset. They actually worked with Apex to improve it before the official 2.0 release.
No. $299.00 is a great price. Get the 1.0. For $80 you can get an Apex trigger which is nicer than the 2.0. For alittle more you can get Talon grips. You will come out ahead.
B Law95 If you look around you should be able to find a better price than $469. The actual difference in price between the original and the 2.0 at the wholesale level is about $43 as of 5 mins ago.
Got my gen 1today❤️came with green&red sights Don’t like the flush mag, had to get a tyrant designs +2 extension and put mag guts in the 8 for +2. Now to port the slide & barrel😁 Edit: Don’t get tyrant mag extension they do not include a spring which is needed. Go with Xtech👍theirs come with a spring
@@scottk1562 come on bud drop the anal retentalness. Let's all not be so politically correct. Mags clips there called both. They are what we call them. I'm sure the point was made
Basically the same exept for a lil better trigger, grip and mini front slide serrations. I love my 2.0 but not sure if it was worth spending like 200 more than the original
Also if you change or alter you're gun in any way. If you have to use it for protection, when u go to court, prosecuting attorney will use that against you. (On the trigger part)
I own the original Shield and I feel it’s not worth the upgrade to switch. I mean my grip feels fine to me and I know for a fact that the 2.0 tigger might be a hair smoother but it’s not a major difference. I’m super happy with my Shield and funny thing is, my son in law bought it just 4 months ago brand new, he put around 400 rounds through it, he doesn’t think is compares to his Glock 26, so he sold it to me for $150.00....For real...I always pay for his range fees though so Maybe he felt to bless me this time around. There’s not a scratch on it..
The gen 1 is probably my favorite gun I own. I shoot it really well and I carry it often. I see no need to upgrade, honestly.
What kind of clip u use I been tryna get the right clip for mines
@@rvgcwade1541 They don't take clips
Add in maggutz springs and you get +1 with the stock 7 round mag and a +2 for the 8 rounder.
Smith and Wesson is kicking all kinds of ass with keeping the crowd happy!
Kevin Wise agreed I’m picking up the .45 today myself
not really. If they wanted to they should issue a M&P 10mm pistol to compete with glock 20. I think they should just stop producing the M&P 40 and 357 sig versions and just make an M&P 10mm fullsize pistol and then sell the barrels and mags for the other two. They'd make alot more money and THEN give the people what they want.
ZFlyingVLover, judging from empirical evidence, in this case first-place sales numbers for the M&P, I'd say Smith & Wesson is doing quite well. Marketing a niche caliber like the 10mm exclusively, and then making the consumer buy additional parts to assemble a .40 S&W or .357 Sig pistol, however, is not a viable strategy. Which is likely why S&W doesn't do it.
@@ZFlyingVLover u 10mm guys always crack me up. So u think Smith should "stop Making 40 s&w and 357 sig". ok I could see your logic. Smith should just make the 10mm. wait what???
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I agree. The only possible thing I could ask for in the shield is reversible mag release for us lefties. Yeah I can use a little manipulation but for the #1 selling CCW I feel like it should’ve always been there.
Excellent video. I just purchased the original (unused and still in original packaging for $240.) I am very happy with it.
Where did you buy it for this price ?
@@amineaitsadiq69 academy sports is having a sale starting tomorrow with $50 rebate and $50 academy gift card the price comes out to $229 before tax and fees.
@@ratha8665 Now $189 with Hot Deal + S&W rebate + Academy gift card.
@@ratha8665
For the original or the 2.0?
@@jshepard152 original
Excellent review, I have a Shield in 9mm w/o thumb safety, I really like the pistol and was curious as to what the 2.0 offered and you did a great job explaining it. However, I wouldn't trade my original for the newer offering. Thanks.
I would like to see an ambidextrous safely
I love my original shield. I am a glock fan boy but I now own a shield and M&P 45c starting to forget about glocks.
I keep telling all my Glock boys to hop on the M&P train. Lol
I just purchased a 2.0 compact and carry that now.
In my opinion, you do the best tabletop reviews on TH-cam.
I'm satisfied with my Gen. 1. Taking it to the range tomorrow morning.
As somebody who very recently purchased the Shield and wants to know every aspect about the gun, inside and out, this video has been extremely helpful and im very grateful to you for it! So far, wonderful gun and will most likely be my EDC at least for now
just stipple the original and you'll have the 2.0 lol
6:04 Trigger changes discussed here.
Great review, btw.
so more aggressive grip and a slight trigger job for an extra Benjamin? gotcha - keeping the gen 1
In his demonstration of the triggers I don't see or hear any difference like most reviews he spent too much time on triggers in my opinion
I was going to get gen 2. My dealer talked me into gen 1. I'm happy! Saved me extra money for not much in return.
The grip difference is night and day personally I'll drop the extra hundred for a not gross grip
I've shot both. I'll pay the extra money for the 2.0
That's just a personal opinion. They're both excellent firearms.
Amen. My conclusion as well
I got mine chambered in .40 a few years ago and porting it was one of the first upgrades I did. A few years later and recently, I upgraded the guide rod spring system to one by Zahal, and it actually makes it easier to rack the slide. Then I got a Crimson Trace light/laser combo that looks like a small block and is very intuitive and easy to operate. I don't think I'll upgrade the sights or the trigger. The laser will compensate for other things like managing a less-than-sastisfactory trigger. And since I can't conceal carry, a premium trigger system and sights would be overkill for home defense. Glad that I watched this video because I used to regret not waiting for the newer Shield. Not anymore.
Can’t carry concealed but buys a gun that is designed to be a back up gun. Your “upgrades” show you are an amateur
@@HWG-wm8ld You're ignorant about me and my situation. You don't even know the additional reasons why I did upgrades to that particular gun. Not all of us have good vision and some of us may have disabilities, or we may be less agile and alert because of our age. One person is partially handicapped, so they need all the advantages they can get. There's other people in the house who would benefit from a gun with upgrades who are much older. I've already experienced an attempted home invasion by 4 ex-cons, and later two attempted burglaries. A CCW was denied to me because of politics and because I can't "donate" lots of money to the Sheriff. I would have had a chance if I was an actor, even an anti-2A one.
I love the obsessing over the need for an audible click that will mean nothing when shots are fired to defend one's life.
Right, people get so anal.
Yeah I have no problem with the original
Once you have enough firearms.... and actually shoot them frequently..... you can start to get picky about triggers.
I’m certainly guilty about it now but years ago I could care less. I always give a factory trigger on a new firearm some time before swapping it out but 9/10 times I see obvious enough accuracy improvements. Not only for myself but new shooters as well.
I don't think it's about the noise. Just that the noise tends to represent a more crisp reset
Gun Weinie talk.
Been carrying the original shield 13 years in. I just can’t seem to get away from it. It’s just the perfect EDC carry gun. Near 3000 rounds over those 13 years and 1 stove pipe. And only 5 jams. This gun is a Gem. With proper cleaning after a good day at the range. It’s a workhorse that keeps on working. I did end up putting Trijicon Day and night sights and Apex 2.0N trigger with only 3.4 lb trigger pull. Also carry a diamondback DB9 in the pocket or usually on the ankle as a back up. Also a darn good gun. 2000 rounds about 10 hang ups. But some my fault. Awesome video even though old it’s a true goodie. Now subbed.
Is Jiffy Lube packing the shield for S&W?
No kidding- I've never had a firearm come out of the box looking it was dropped in a barrel of 5w/30.
I have 2 M&P's and they didn't look like that. He must have oiled them. Rather sloppilly.
Country Crock cleans *and* protects.
This guy dropped it in K.Y jelly for maximum bullet penetration.
Really? Mine wasn’t like that, my Walther P22 was!
I have the first gen....love it!
Either the original or 2.0, both are very nice sturdy pistols that you can't go wrong with. I have the original and never experienced the "gritty trigger" people talk about. My trigger is quite smooth without any mods. Its been a very solid pistol and has never misfired or jammed.
On my Shield 9mm, with the original trigger there was basically no audible or tactile reset. The trigger was just ok. I put in the Apex Duty/Carry kit and I think Apex uses the sear from the 2.0 in their kit for the Gen1 Shield because the trigger on your 2.0 seams to be exactly like mine with the Apex kit, minus the Apex return spring (explanation below). Originally with the stock set up I was getting 6.2lbs. I installed the full kit and even though the trigger felt better, it actually made the pull weight heavier at 6.6lbs. I did some reading online and the S&W return spring was lighter so I reinstalled it and now I get 5.5lbs and the trigger is perfect. Not to heavy, not to light, very crisp, audible/tactile reset that is decent (could be a little better as it's just a bit soft). But fantastic over all for a striker fired gun. If you have a Gen1 Shield and don't want to trade it for the 2.0 just upgrade the trigger and your good. IMO
$579 is the MSRP with Tritium night sites, the base model is $479.
With INTEGRATED CRIMSON TRACE® RED LASER the MSRP is $499...
Great video!! Thank you for making it and sharing it!
Thank you for such a complete description of the differences of these iterations.
Have a shield 9mm performance center. Absolutely no complaints. Accurate and feels good in hands especially since I added a houge rubber grip.
Got a M&P 45 Shield with the Performance Center upgrades about 2 weeks ago
As a left handed shooter, I have no problem with the magazine release. My left hand index finger hits it quickly & nicely.
Now, locking the slide back isn't as smooth yet.
All in all, I'm very happy with this weapon. Size, fit, accuracy, all acceptable for what it's designed for.
I just bought the S&W MP Shield original 9mm. I don't see any significant differences between the two except for the trigger.
I agree.. i was expecting something way different designs.. i bought the original gun also..
I got the Apex duty carry lowers trigger weight to 5lbs
@@macross7kI bought the original about 2 years ago and have been very happy with it. I see no reason to upgrade to the 2.0. I was looking for a pocketable 9mm and first bought the Kahr cm9.
What a mistake! Failures to feed, trigger guard too small which tore up my trigger finger, take down was a real pain. The shield fits in the same desantis nemesis holster I got for the kahr. I added the magguts +2 kit to the 7 round mag, giving me 9+1. The magguts baseplate adds just enough length to allow me to get a full three finger grip while still able to conceal in the pocket.
I cannot conceal the 8 round mag in the pocket. The shield has been 100% reliable. Definitely a big s and w fan, I sometimes carry the m and p bodyguard .380 and it's also been problem free.
Also have the m and p sport 2 ar-15. Modded it quite a bit with magpul accessories and love the rifle. Only other firearm I own is a Remington 870 magpul tactical. Covers all my bases. Knives on the other hand, are something I can't have enough of.
@@abc456f thanks foe your feedbacks..👍👍👍
The trigger is a significant part of the gun.
Will be picking up my new S&W Shield 2.0 9mm this week. Great price at $335. Wanted the Shield for better IWB concealment at 4 o'clock. I felt my .380 just wasn't enough stopping power (psychologically) and my Sig SP2022 9MM just wasn't concealable enough. I noticed many times I was printing to much. Will probably still utilize my .380 as a boot gun for backup only. Went with a BraDec IWB holster for my new Shield 2.0 we'll see how it feels and works out. Great video. Be safe and EDC
Where are you and people finding the 2.0 for under $350? Everywhere online I see it for like $450+
Try Buds
Thanks for the video. I just purchased the M&P Shield 9. I did look at the M2 and decided that it was not worth the extra cost. My local gun dealer also had the 10 round magazine in stock from pro mag that fits the pistol perfectly.
After 200 rounds on my s&w shield the trigger is as smooth as a baby's butt. (Original Shield)
@JKay11235 any jams or malfunction?
I have well over 2,000 rounds on my Gen 1, and my trigger still feels crunchy. I don't like it.
@@thefitgm335 upgrade to APEX trigger.
@@gutadin5 Can't unfortunately, or I would. Law enforcement policy that I can not alter my off duty.
@@thefitgm335 trade to the Gen 2, I heard the Gen 2 2.0 has a lighter trigger pull.
Very well explained, I enjoy how you actually explain how the firearm works. This is a strong contender for my first EDC and after this video and the comments I feel a when 1 would be best.
I just bought a original Shield 9mm this weekend and loving it so far
Thinking about doing the same thing. The original one is at a great price compared to the 2.0.
@@signsofthetimes886 I paid 299.99 on sale two weeks ago at Scheels sporting goods
I own the original Shield 9mm and I am looking to get me a 2.0 9mm I've been carrying my shield 9 for years and I love it can't wait to try out the 2.0 9 Shield
It tears shirts like crazy just heads up I sold mine and got the OG.
Matt Soares ty for the information on that isn't that aggressive to wear actually tear shirts that much
This is 2024 now and I just bought a brand new M&P 45 shield, but I had to pay $500 for it. I do not regret it though, I've been carrying it for over a week now and I think I'm in love haha. It replaces a Phoenix arms hp22a which I carried on me at work since it was easily concealable but ridiculously underpowered, and I was carrying a full size Taurus PT 24/7 Pro 40 S&W when I would go to larger stores but it was very difficult to conceal. This Shield has been a dream for me already to conceal carry because I forget it's even there all day while I'm at work. 🙂
The M&p 45 is not labeled as a shield 🛡️
Just purchased a 2.0 for $299. They are all over GB for $500-$569. Found a place in Minnesota that has them very cheap. Just got my LTC, so watching all kinds of vids on here these days. Great video, thank you. Very happy with my purchase.
New or used ?
@@yanaa.1712 Brandy new.
@@fiddy_watchguy nice 👌
Hands are gonna slip with that much oil jeeez!
I have had 3 of the original 9mm Shields and 1 of them in 40. I have carried and practiced with the 9mm since 2014. I love this gun and the price point compared to most other guns is another reason it’s such a popular carry gun.
Based on your review, I would call the newer version a 1.02 as it is little changed.
To me, 2.0 would mean bigger changes.
I had my carry shield for 3 1/2 years. Great gun for the price.
Do you still carry it?
I bought mine back in 2015 (Gen 1) and has been [imo] one of my best firearm purchases, by far. This was a very well detailed explanation of the differences between the two models, however I [personally] prefer my Gen 1 model over the "2.0". I would also like to point out, that on my Shield®️, I have the "sharper" 9mm stamping on the barrel, opposed to what you detailed in your differences (not that it really matters! 🙄) and by it being a "California issue", mine doesn't have the topside "peephole", but a "when loaded" (red) raised indicator instead! 😉👌 Outside of that, you were spot on!..💯%
#LoveMyShield!..🛡🥰
How’s it run? Any mis feeds hear and there or flawless ?
On a side note the 9mm font on the barrel probably has more to do with production date than 1.0 vs 2.0 as my original shield has the newer font. As for changes, your basically paying an extra $50 for a stipple job and a very MINOR trigger lightening. Changes are very minimal compared to the larger 2.0's. This is more like 1.2, they are the same damn gun. 2.0s are going for $429 here and regular shields $375 (except 40 cal which I guess are unpopular enough to sell for $299).
The print on the barrel is what caught my eye in the video, I looked at my 1.0 and the font is the same as the 2.0 he was shaking around, so I was wondering if the guy who had it before me switched barrels or something. It's definitely a 1.0 slide and frame.
Talon Grips work well on my Gen 1 Shield. I do love mt 2.0 Compact though. Great comparison...thanks!
Put them on my 2.0 as the stippling was too rough on my old side when carrying.
@@oldgoat50 I thought about it, but decided to take some 320 grit automotive sandpaper to it...worked great.
I had my m&p shield for 2 years, fired a 1000 rounds though it, no issues what so ever, am Very Happy with it 😍🔫💎
@Maurice Haynes Yes, it was Excellent...
Excellent review👍👍👍👍 looking at purchasing this pistol for my daughter.. This was a big help..✌
I bought my 1.0 shield a couple months ago at academy for 329.00 I don't see anything I'm missing out on very happy with it I put a rubberized talon grip I ordered from talon gun grips that made the grip very nice got the grips for my 3 mags also
Does anybody know if Shield 1.0 mags service 2.0’s? I can’t find OEM mags anywhere for the 2.0 right now and I see what look like a lot of double stack mags available but not for the 2.0..
Excellent review on both!! Thanks on the insight n information, doesn't get easier than that in making a decision..
I own a 1. 0 shield 9mm and a .45 shield. The .45 is not called a 2.0 but it has the aggressive texture and better / lighter trigger. I shoot the .45 a little better than the 9mm due to the upgrades. But if you already own a 1.0 9mm I'm not sure its worth the extra money.
Excellent review and comparison!
Thanks! Just picked up the original Shield tonight for $349. Great comparison review.
Thanks for watching! Enjoy your Shield - its a good choice
I'm putting it in rotation this winter as a pocket fire extinguisher! So many people loving the Shied, they can't be wrong! My local shop didn't have much to say good and said "the Shield is a weak handgun" !!! I laughed because they know me well (we're gun snobs) but I have complete faith in the little Shield to get it done! Thank you very much for your contribution on TH-cam! Your videos are very professional and well done.
Just bought the shield original from Academy. After in store $50 gift card and factory rebate my price was $213 with taxes.
Crazy good deal.
Evers Irias i got 40ty with lock for 420 USD
Probably a better choice to get an original (while it was on sale) and upgrade to an apex carry duty trigger and talon grips. Would have been nice if the 2.0 had a lower rail for a light
Would love to see maybe just a quick video of 2.0 vs Performance Center Shield.
Julie goulob did a test and the compensator didn't do much of anything... The shirt barrel is so close to rotational axis that it would take stouter or longer barrel for it to work... But u also get the trigger... I tried for one... But I'm not paying the extra money for a vented barrel that does no good... And they say u lose velocity no much but still... It's a short barrel
So if the biggest difference is the trigger then why shouldn’t I buy the v1 for $250 and add an apex trigger for like $100? That would put me way under the cost of the 2.0 which goes closer to $425ish.
Basically it's the same gun.. I thought some of the design itself might have changed.. no big deal.. not buying the same gun over again.
Right? Having some ergonomic upgrades does not seem to be worth the increased price. Which is why I have the 1.0 and not the 2.0
@@YouWhatMate_Official The only worthwhile ergonomic upgrade to me are the fish scales on the front near the muzzle. I hate the aggressive grip texture honestly. I prefer the original's much more.
If I had the original Shield, I would not bother to upgrade, but I didn't have one. I bought the 2.0 and it's my favorite gun to shoot. The Shields are the best value of any on the market imo.
@@AxcelGamer97 I took some 100 grit (on the seems) and sanded it down some. I also did work on the beavertail and trigger area inside and out. Looks and feels nice now.
I only see a difference in the grip and those tiny front slide serrations. Who really needs those?
I got mine on a military base exchange for $283 after a discount and general sale going on at the time 👌👌
Original or 2.0?
Just bought the model 2.0 9mm with the red Crimson Trace integrated for $349! I absolutely love this weapon!
The shield has always had the steel mag release. It's never been all polymer......
as a shield 2.0 owner, ill say this: super reliable, accurate, small, light and budget friendly gun. As far as negatives: the grip does snag on clothing pretty badly, I added the hogue over grip sleeve, and it cured any gripe I have had with the firearm. trigger is excellent for what it is, its not a 1911 or a single action revolver... capacity is adjustable with magazine extenders if you wish. overall excellent choice for edc, cc.
Do the 2.0's take double stacked magazines?
@@donsal.t.1765 nope. Still single stack.
@@beastcarsnj868 ah ok. thanks
So what oil do you recommend? 5w-30 in a 55gal barrel?
Lmfao
Bass Pro has the Original 9mm or 40, with thumb $289 + $50 instant rebate + $50 mail in rebate = $189 !
I thought 299 was a decent deal wow. They almost gave you that thing.
I have an original and would like to point out that the originals do have an over travel trigger stop although it is smaller and placed differently.
17:57 just to tell us the diff? I have a 5min attention span pal!
I recently purchased the 2.0 and I love it. I feels well balanced and is far superior to the Glock 43. My only issue is that the magazines are stiff as heck! I have to push the follower with a pen because I cannot with my thumb.
@DR Dan amen to that man. Yes, that is a good solution. After a trip to the range and about 200 rounds later, the mag springs have gotten less stiff as well as the slide stop. Guess it takes time. Also, I loaded both mags to full capacity and let them sit with the rounds for a few days and that has helped a lot. Just out of the box they are insanely difficult. I'm just glad i didn't get the mags with the springs that bend and warp inside the magazine and creates a tangled mess. But when i took apart my 8 round mag the spring looked differently from the ones that warped. Must be new from Smith and Wesson.
excellent video! subbed! Did you write out what you were going to say in order to maintain the narrative, or were you winging it? You did good
Really good review. Thank you.
They are almost exactly the same. Grip texture slight change. Trigger slight change slide front serrations slight change. All in all I can change all of these on my original shield.
A section of bicycle tire innertube works great stretched around the grip.
good and thorough explanation. I went to your site. you don't have any for sale.
The M&P shield 380 2.0 is really a nice piece as well❤
Hyve makes a nice extended mag. Kit For this.
This is a very informative video. However, when viewing a comparison video such as this, one would expect a more side by side comparing of the two firearms. (First one then the other you miss a little) All of this information that you provided could have been easily obtained from S&W website. After watching your video, the only difference in the two that I see, is the stippling on the grip, the front slide serrations, and the 2.0 markings. Oh, of course the price difference. Maybe I missed something after 18 some odd minutes of watching...
supposedly better trigger
Seems like no real differences. Glad I got another of the originals on deep discount and the rebate. Would have been helpful to note what parts are interchangeable and if the APEX upgrades are the same for both. Thank goodness S&W isn't following the path of Glock with a new version every year..... sheesh.
Well you’ll never have to oil them again, that’s for sure
I always have a round in the chamber..I don’t need to look.
These are made in Massachusetts, funny thing is you can't legally buy anything without a load indicator in MA (Also must have safety switch, and 10 lbs trigger pull, lol, yes, 10 lbs!)
Is this an Armor All tire dressing commercial ? Good video , none the less
I have the 1.0 I bought for $225. Just got the 2.0 with integrated laser for $335. I like the idea of having a factory laser and not a bulky add on. Almost identical in every way. Triggers are exactly the same. Weight is suppose to be lighter in the 2.0 for some reason. Can’t really feel it. Finish on frame is more smooth on the 1.0 and grip is more aggressive on 2.0. Says new audible reset on 2.0 but my 1.0 sounds exactly the same.
I’ve owned close to 30 carry guns and I feel the shield is the best for what it is. Now with the Plus version out I would consider that over the 1.0. Only thing I’m not crazy about is the cheap looking flat trigger it comes with. Add some Trijicon HD’s on these and your good to go
I just recently bought a used gen 1 shield. Haven't shot it yet, thanks bills for existing so I can't buy ammo lol, but it will be my carry gun for the foreseeable future
I may have missed it but did they beef up the slide rails on the 2.0 Shield like they did on the 2.0C? anyone that pays over $500 for a Shield is out of their mind. I'd buy a PPS M2 first.
The pps m2 looks like it was built from a lego set to blocky and heavy did they fix the problem with barrel penning chipped barrel problem on the pss m2 yet i wonder.
Yes, the slide rails are solid steel in the 2.0 Shield 9 like the 2.0C version. Jerry Miculek mentions it in his review.
@@brucedon1951 no they didnt fix it. Bought one a week ago. It's really bad. Haven't even shot it, just racked the slide about 20 times and dry fired about 20 times and its showing the peening in 2 places
I just got the original. Love it.
I picked up my original 9mm shield at Cabella’s with vets discount, Smith &Wesson factory rebate, tax and additional approval cost $250 out the door about 6 months ago.. It’s almost identical to my Taurus slim 709 which I’ve had for years. They both use the same holster and shoot about the same. Don’t know if I can give the edge to either one over the other. Nice gun for conceal carry.
Very informative! Great job with this video.
Thanks I really appreciate it!
I only paid 279.00 for my shield I bought it from buds all you people are getting ripped off if your paying more
Curtis Napier paid 260 for mine, basspro shop has them on sell
If you can't find a sale at your local retailer, i can attest that Buds is the best. Fast shipping, great prices, great customer service.
I just paid the same at Academy today for the 1.0 plus it came with a free extra extended magazine.
Thanks. Never heard of buds until now! Its crazy how reasonable their prices are.
@@Geecheeman palmettoarmory has it for 250 right now
Smith & Wesson great customer service !!
I actually prefer the lighter weight original M&P Shield. An important point for compact guns in the first place. If you think every ounce doesn't make a difference, hold a one-ounce coin in your hand.
Information on those two pistols very informative
Thanks for your comparison video. Was wondering what was the upgrade difference. Thanks
Nice thorough review. I was going to pick up an older version but I think I'll go with the 2.0.
The shield is the only model since the 2.0 came out that i like the 1.0 better...but the full sized 2.0 is a huge improvement over the 1.0. especially the trigger..my 2.0 4.6 barrel 45 is one smooth operator!
If never understood why people complain about a trigger on gun. If it's for self defence last thing id think about is how gritty or heavy it is
Roadrider19119 my shields 6 pound trigger would turn into a 1 pound trigger in self defense setting
People like to be able to make accurate shots. You may have to shoot at greater than 3 yards.
Roadrider19119 my buddy just bought the original shield and I shot the pistol and it was dead on for me and I am not a great pistol shooter but the gun fells great in hand
Enduro EPICHUGGYBEAR must be nice.
Seriously.... and its pretty damn easy to change the trigger if it is that big of an issue
Why so much oil on the gun? Nice comparison btw..👍
I was thinking the same thing!
This is a very nice side by side. Thanks for doing it. i got the shield 40 for 279 when the $75 rebate was going on. i carry this and I’m used to the trigger and wondered if the 2.0 was worth getting. I’m thinking now if i did anything it would be to find a gen 1 performance center model for less than the 2.0 since it has a “better” trigger than what i have now. Thanks again for the video. It helped me make up my mind.
Dont forget, you can also make your.40 shield to a 9mm just with the barrel swap, and the .40 mags will still shoot 9mm so in my opinion you get both worlds in one GREAT TOOL.
God bless.
Interesting
Also... The Gen 1 shield you have is a gen1.5 the very first releases literally had no tactile or audible reset.
Watch colion noirs video you'll see the lack of a reset. They actually worked with Apex to improve it before the official 2.0 release.
40s&w shield 1.0 couldn’t be happier
If you take a look closely the groove inside the barrel the 2.0 is thicker than the original.
Is the 2.0 worth the extra $169? My local stores have the 1.0 for $299 and the 2.0 $469, I might have to jump on the 1.0 and get some talon grips
No. $299.00 is a great price. Get the 1.0. For $80 you can get an Apex trigger which is nicer than the 2.0. For alittle more you can get Talon grips. You will come out ahead.
I put talons on mine. It's like different gun. The trigger on the 1.0 is really good for the money.
B Law95 If you look around you should be able to find a better price than $469. The actual difference in price between the original and the 2.0 at the wholesale level is about $43 as of 5 mins ago.
I’m buying talon grips for my 2.0 because the texture is too rough for IWB carry. Good for shooting. Horrible for carry
Will the 2.0shield fit in a holster for an original shield
Yes
Apex trigger and talon grips on my shield gen 1 and I'm a happy shooter :)
same here + TruGlo TFX Pro sights.
Got my gen 1today❤️came with green&red sights
Don’t like the flush mag, had to get a tyrant designs +2 extension and put mag guts in the 8 for +2. Now to port the slide & barrel😁
Edit: Don’t get tyrant mag extension they do not include a spring which is needed.
Go with Xtech👍theirs come with a spring
Will the shield 2.0 mags work in the original shield ?
Bobby Powell pretty sure they’re inner changeable
I wish shield came with three clips like the Walther. Making grip shorter. 6,7,8 round magazinzes
Mine did not come with any clips at all!
@@scottk1562 come on bud drop the anal retentalness. Let's all not be so politically correct. Mags clips there called both. They are what we call them. I'm sure the point was made
Really? My PPQ only came with 2 mags.
Nice video, I'm happy with my gen 1. If I want a better trigger, it's cheaper to go with the Apex system.
Love my gen 1 also.
Good job cutting to the chase regarding the differences. Certainly not worth upgrading to the 2.0 if you already have the original.
Basically the same exept for a lil better trigger, grip and mini front slide serrations. I love my 2.0 but not sure if it was worth spending like 200 more than the original
Also if you change or alter you're gun in any way. If you have to use it for protection, when u go to court, prosecuting attorney will use that against you. (On the trigger part)
No they won't. Zero cases of that actually happening and someone getting in trouble due to a trigger.
@@Christian-Espinoza that's not what the gun attorneys say...
The original shield is about a 100 bucks cheaper. Shield 1.0 For the win!
I own the original Shield and I feel it’s not worth the upgrade to switch. I mean my grip feels fine to me and I know for a fact that the 2.0 tigger might be a hair smoother but it’s not a major difference. I’m super happy with my Shield and funny thing is, my son in law bought it just 4 months ago brand new, he put around 400 rounds through it, he doesn’t think is compares to his Glock 26, so he sold it to me for $150.00....For real...I always pay for his range fees though so Maybe he felt to bless me this time around.
There’s not a scratch on it..