How this new stealth plane keeps the US ahead of China

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @Search-Party
    @Search-Party  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Use code SEARCHPARTY at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan: incogni.com/searchparty

    • @sherlockmaverick
      @sherlockmaverick 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      When is Search Party coming to Nebula?

    • @StatusNull
      @StatusNull 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yessir!

    • @user-uy1rg8td1v
      @user-uy1rg8td1v 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great TH-cam video and channel, but I found the background music was a little too loud and distracting. I would strongly suggest you get rid of it altogether. I firmly believe that background music is distracting, annoying, and unnecessary (especially for educational or opinionated videos with lots of talking). I also believe that people want to hear you speak/get information/hear your opinions and not hear generic background music that doesn't really add anything useful and that people have to mentally filter out. Plus it will be one less thing you will have to do when making videos. Thank you for your consideration.

    • @juliane__
      @juliane__ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      8:46 What is about the H-20, does it not come close to the abilities? Is he that sure, because he has espionage information to proove that?
      I guess he moved the scales to come to the conclusion.

    • @badhan7878
      @badhan7878 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm amaze that it's cheaper then the Northrop B-2 Spirit

  • @chrism2465
    @chrism2465 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1635

    My father is retired USAF he had a saying: Fighters are propaganda Bombers set national policy.

    • @CouncilOfTheWolf
      @CouncilOfTheWolf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      Heh. Though I guess you also can't use your bombers if the air space is contested, so fighters are important too.

    • @mgboltstwitch6921
      @mgboltstwitch6921 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@CouncilOfTheWolf STEALTH BOMBER honestly no idea

    • @CouncilOfTheWolf
      @CouncilOfTheWolf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

      @mgboltstwitch6921 Stealth planes become more detectable as they approach their targets and enter the intersections of multiple radars, there's no such thing as perfectly stealthy. And bombers are slow. If they're physically seen in the sky, it's easy to shoot them. If the opposite was true of anything I just said, fighters or multi role jets like the F-22 and the F-35 would've never existed.

    • @RaNc0R
      @RaNc0R 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@mgboltstwitch6921stealth doesn’t mean plane is invisible, it still can be tracked using low frequency dual band radars, it still have IR signature, ofc the visuals.

    • @muhcharona
      @muhcharona 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@RaNc0R Yea Ukraine and Houthi's have called old assumptions into question, no doubt this applies with this one as well.

  • @Joy-e5m4v
    @Joy-e5m4v 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +880

    10:29 to everyone, that's confused about the 203 billion dollar evaluation. You're going to understand that it's over 30 years which includes maintenance and costs,

    • @conflictedthought1
      @conflictedthought1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

      This are the same people who freak out about the cost of f35 being over 1.5T but don't know it includes all the maintenance and support for the f35 life time. Also the US didn't spend 1.5T others countries also foot in the bill

    • @radustana
      @radustana 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      ​@@conflictedthought1not to mention that 1.5 trillion also include the technological upgrades that it will receive over its 50+ year service life

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I don't think this comment is right Are you serious that you think the B-21 can be manufactured and operated for at 30 years for only $200B? What do really think annual operating expenses will be over those 30 plus years? What do you think it costs to fly this aircraft per hour?
      Your math doesn't work out by a very, very long shot

    • @tjadams8
      @tjadams8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@conflictedthought1 Yea.. How dare people freak out about our Gov spending $1.5T on airplanes, since our healthcare system is great & vets are so well taken care of. We should be happy to pay $90,000 for $500 bearings, while tens of thousands of vets lay homeless, not getting the help they need because VA funding was cut. But hey, look at those pretty airplanes...
      & Enlighten me on how much our allies, that refuse to spend money on their own defense, footed of our $1.5T bill? What a joke.

    • @beepboop9848
      @beepboop9848 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@conflictedthought1 dude thats still a fucking crazy amount tho

  • @MaxxSkywalker
    @MaxxSkywalker 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1011

    I honestly prefer the geopolitical stories over the sports stories.

    • @StarKillerSK
      @StarKillerSK 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Yeah mee too

    • @zumabbar
      @zumabbar 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

      i prefer both since sports are often also political

    • @MaxxSkywalker
      @MaxxSkywalker 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      @@zumabbar I'm not a huge fan of sports so I have a general disinterest in that topic, but every video I've seen from this channel, regardless of the topic (sports or otherwise), has been topnotch.

    • @pauljewett8844
      @pauljewett8844 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I don’t, I’m the type of guy who likes to watch anime as much as they love to play football, and this channel scratches that incredibly nieche itch for nerdy politics and sports. Keep on rocking brother

    • @phrous
      @phrous 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is also good segment

  • @ChillTry26
    @ChillTry26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1101

    As a pilot, we are playing offense, not defense

    • @rat2244
      @rat2244 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +111

      The best defense is offense

    • @Frizzleman
      @Frizzleman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

      So you admit to being a warmongering empire?

    • @SuperRavensfan101
      @SuperRavensfan101 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

      @@Frizzleman I dont think any American *myself included* contests that the government likes to have the biggest stick and knows how to swing it. Brutal truth is as much as I hate how my country spends its budget, Either party we vote for spends it the same way so no matter which way we vote nothing changes in terms of defense policy. I hope you know that a countries people doesn't equal the feeling of its government.

    • @mjaraz5442
      @mjaraz5442 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      You must be a tree-hugging pacifist. I guess you never heard of shock and awe.

    • @joesanpatricio794
      @joesanpatricio794 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeahhh the US isn’t “playing offense”, it’s an empire. US foreign policy can best be compared to the machinations of organized crime. Except where the mob might dominate a neighborhood or a city, the mayonnaise mafia in control of the US has made a racket of the majority of the world

  • @enryumazino3939
    @enryumazino3939 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3080

    The actual reason why they don't have universal healthcare 💀

    • @conflictedthought1
      @conflictedthought1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

      Nah, not really

    • @Thisisntreal103
      @Thisisntreal103 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +465

      Crazy as it sounds. If you look at their budget they can actually afford both and still have money to spare. The U.S. is just stuck in a stupid self made either / or situation

    • @radustana
      @radustana 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      ​@@Thisisntreal103was about to say this

    • @jojonesjojo8919
      @jojonesjojo8919 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the US, corporations and billionaires have bought the politicians, so they set policy. Military Industrial wants these planes. The healthcare corporations like things the way they are.
      Couldn't really call it a democracy anymore.

    • @jaredj631
      @jaredj631 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      The real reason we don’t have Global Tierney

  • @fdangleshadang-a-lang7149
    @fdangleshadang-a-lang7149 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +303

    The B21 is actually a fairly bargain deal for such a prestigious aircraft. They’re actually coming in under budget and on time, which is the exact opposite of how the F35’s development took place. $700m for a stealth bomber is a good price when you consider a Boeing 787 is almost $250m

    • @shakiMiki
      @shakiMiki 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      A country where life expectancy is falling, people go hungry & many do not have access to health care. Yeah a bargain.

    • @gravoc857
      @gravoc857 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shakiMiki Bud, America entered the global hegemony game centuries ago. We’re stuck in a global chess match. What do you suggest? Focus on Americans and move towards isolationism? If that’s your desire or goal, then what’s your plan to off-ramp from the global stage? How do we ensure our economic powerhouse if we aren’t globally present? How do we stop ourselves from being subjugated by Russia or China, who both desire the power the US currently has.
      People who make the argument you’re making are generally passionate, moral finger waggers, who are both ignorant and naive to the nature of reality we find ourselves in.

    • @qorekt5169
      @qorekt5169 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      ​@@shakiMiki honestly could be worse compared to what other countries are doing. Not the best but not the worst

    • @imhimdk1785
      @imhimdk1785 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      @@shakiMikimany of those ppl in America has a chance to change there lives everyday. Ik America is worse off than before but being broke in America is far better than being broke in almost every other country

    • @davestopforth
      @davestopforth 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      ​@@shakiMiki if it bothers you so much why don't you move to China or Russia?
      I agree with your sentiment, the decline we are seeing right now is not good, but that is what people voted for, and military spending is not optional, so when the elected politicians are utterly incompetent then the budget cuts affect the people, not the military.
      If you want to cut military spending then you're giving the likes of China the green light to invade, and trust me, communism is infinitely worse than the free market. Communism doesn't cut welfare and public spending simply because there is no welfare and public spending.
      So if you don't like it, I suggest you move to a country with less military spending so that you can understand why its important in the first place.

  • @guykibler255
    @guykibler255 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Something that might be useful to mention is that bombers in modern US doctrine act more as mobile cruise missile platforms, rather than traditional bombers. B-52s are completely non-survivable in a modern conflict, but if you mount air-launched cruise missiles on them, that becomes a lot less of a problems. Some ALCMs have ranges of over 1,000km and newer ones themselves even have stealth features. You can essentially fire cruise missiles from outside detection range, and the launching aircraft or missiles can be stealthy themselves.

    • @silentblackhole
      @silentblackhole 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. They have also developed the ability to launch multiple missiles and even EW missiles by dropping a pallet of them off the back and then using a parracute to then drop many of them out of the pallet. A few planes with multiple pallets is going to creates LOTS of targets for their radars.

    • @gavinthecreator0435
      @gavinthecreator0435 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would it be a more efficient way of launching glide-missiles for re-entry?

    • @amosimo2870
      @amosimo2870 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you mount enough cruise missiles on a stealth bomber though ?

  • @bruno3
    @bruno3 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +249

    0:08 "This mysterious airplane took flight for the first time".
    And at least a dozen people who saw it added one more "UFO" to their list of sightings. "I'm telling y'all, I saw it with my own two eyes! That ain't no airplane!"

    • @GarciaDorelion
      @GarciaDorelion 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Was about to say the same. Isn't that the flying saucer ??

    • @RetroBlockade
      @RetroBlockade 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All a UFO is, is an Unidentified Flying Object, so if anything in the sky hasn't been identified by the viewer, it is a UFO. So if someone saw this in the sky and didn't know what it was, then it is a UFO.

    • @raspoie4915
      @raspoie4915 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      wouldn't be surprised if a portion of UFO sightings was just the nation's air force testing out their newest toy

    • @einautofan6685
      @einautofan6685 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This kind of shape is around since the reveal of B-2A...😜🤣

    • @einautofan6685
      @einautofan6685 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The good thing is, nobody believes in "Believers"! Soo, Area 51, keep going!😉😎👍

  • @gameboygamer6498
    @gameboygamer6498 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    "The B-21 is clearly inspired by the B-2" Probably because they were both made by Northrop Grumman? LOL

  • @flennboyd6413
    @flennboyd6413 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Please name the defense companies involved, in this case, it's Northrop Grumman.

    • @antonpavlov9019
      @antonpavlov9019 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Probably they had to sponsor the video for that lol

    • @abba-Flammenfresser
      @abba-Flammenfresser 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@antonpavlov9019 I’m sure the 500k+ dead Russians wish they had their own NG😹 but you already knew that Ivan. Congrats on the tactical shovels and the cope cages tho Mr.#2militaryinZaWrld!

    • @antonpavlov9019
      @antonpavlov9019 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@abba-Flammenfresser I'm from Ukraine actually, but I don't find anything funny in the fact that people are dying. I wish you never find out how it is be a citizen of a country at war

  • @kjv35
    @kjv35 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ad is from 4:40 to 6:28

  • @RenéSaussy
    @RenéSaussy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

    Considering another country’s strong air defense as a national security threat is kinda crazy if you think about it…

    • @great_aymen
      @great_aymen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      It really is yes, and no one has mentioned it in the comments so far

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      Thats how winners stay ahead tbh. If you dont consider all potential threats youll just fall

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Think about it. If war ever breaks out with the country that has the most advanced defense, you already want to know how to beat it.
      This goes for same countries to the US but they just dont have the money nor power

    • @proxy3386
      @proxy3386 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you can’t penetrate another country’s increasingly sophisticated air defenses - especially for a projecting superpower like the United States - then it is considered a national security risk, because you can’t operate with any MAD-like doctrine, and are just stuck with defending against [example nation]. If you can’t attack targets reliably, then… yeah.

    • @vinceszigetvari6137
      @vinceszigetvari6137 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is crazy, but it also make the most sense if we take mutually assured destruction into account. The guarantee that you won't get nuked is your capacity to nuke back. So another country's air defense is actually a big threat.

  • @DidierPeroni
    @DidierPeroni 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

    As expensive as these might be- this is the kind of technology that made America what it is today.

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      LOL, you are not wrong about that. But i think you should take a good look around, and see, just HOW SCARED people are.

    • @mikajarvio7489
      @mikajarvio7489 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Terror nation Nr.1

    • @PCLinke
      @PCLinke 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What make US today is its geolocation, it's so far away and so big to get invade.
      They know this ofcourse and only building such bombers to use them somewhere else to destroy any threat against their interest.

    • @anthonymako9784
      @anthonymako9784 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👏

    • @ChristoffelTensors
      @ChristoffelTensors 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Deluded? How is this the thing that beats China if we can’t even produce bombs to drop

  • @LeMatt87n
    @LeMatt87n 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

    Do one on Poland. Hear me out:
    A once major power in Europe got taken off the map for over 100years, then subjugated for a long time until its people deposed communist rule.
    Now they are on track to be Europe’s largest land army as they defend NATO on its eastern flank. Theyre proud of national hero’s like pope John Paul, Copernicus, Chopin, Mary Curie, jozef pilsudski, Witold Pilecki (the guy that broke into and back out of Auschwitz to provide intelligence to the Polish govt in exile).
    They tried to form a regional block called Intermarium during the interwar period and they may be trying to do that again.

    • @Mexalen81
      @Mexalen81 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      I'd love to see Poland dial down the nationalism and right-wing oriented politics. They could replace France and Germany as the leading force in europe in the long run.

    • @hordegaming4771
      @hordegaming4771 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes, but A the USSR is no more B the EU are more like them nowadays and C Poland gets the most money from the EU yet "hates them"
      If you hate them sooooooooo much? LEAVE THEN, do what we did. But they won't because they're hypocrites 😊

    • @LeMatt87n
      @LeMatt87n 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hordegaming4771 I agree, they should leave EU behind.

    • @Mexalen81
      @Mexalen81 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@hordegaming4771 i take it, that you're from the UK.
      If so: from what news comes across the channel, it doesn't look like the population actually benefited from Brexit or is actually happy about the outcome.
      I don't see how that counts as a success story for other countries to follow.

    • @mikoajm122
      @mikoajm122 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mexalen81​​⁠​⁠ 8 years of shameless corruption and propaganda by conservatives, people had enough. Opposition managed to gather centrists, liberals, leftists in huge compromise. 74% voter turnout. People won voting against previous gov.
      Nobody in Europe listened us when Russia started war in Georgia and years later in Donbas and Crimea. Unfortunately due to internal policies and years of negligence, Poland wake up too late with army spending.
      ~80% of Poles are in favour of EU. Don’t get distracted by loud minority.

  • @BreadyToCrumble
    @BreadyToCrumble 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    It's always a good day when Search Party uploads!

  • @philipwilliamson5332
    @philipwilliamson5332 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

    I'm all for thinking ahead for situations that can honestly impact national security. But I REALLY wish they thought ahead when it also came to healthcare, education, infrastructure and the everyday working person.

    • @randus7053
      @randus7053 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      In all fairness that is the job of your state, not the Federal government, constitutionally speaking, unless legally the feds can do almost anything under the pretense of the general welfare clause.

    • @samstromberg5593
      @samstromberg5593 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seriously like I’m all for helping out allies and everything but I’m sure we’re all familiar with how you have to put on your own oxygen mask first?

    • @Flightman453
      @Flightman453 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@randus7053 Uh, I’m sorry? It quite is the job of the federal government. They need to be investing in the country. That’s why everything is falling apart.

    • @Y2B123
      @Y2B123 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@randus7053 States cannot optimally implement many policies because they are forced to have free trade and movement with other states. So federal intervention is very much necessary.

    • @ElectronFieldPulse
      @ElectronFieldPulse 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@Flightman453- No, it isn’t falling apart at all. Have you looked at our economic data compared to peer nations? We are doing better than pretty much all of Europe. The NHS in Britain is falling apart while we are responsible for 50 percent of all global new drug discoveries. We have onshored things like chip production and given heavy tax breaks for things like green energy. This has drawn a lot of companies from Europe to the US. We spend nearly the most out of the world on education. What I suspect you mean is that you want more free services (well, free to you) provided by the federal government. It is almost a constant in young people, they think it is just as simple as having the government provide everything and the world would be so much better! It doesn’t work like that at all. We are doing very well right now, this country is not collapsing in the slightest.

  • @michaelcharles38
    @michaelcharles38 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Really love the style of these videos, they remind me of Explained on Netflix. Keep it up guys!

  • @johanngeustyn8068
    @johanngeustyn8068 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This production is insane, well done! Deserve more subs definitely

  • @teddies1992
    @teddies1992 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Looking forward to the Euro 2024 video. Should be a good tournament this year!

    • @solehsolehsoleh
      @solehsolehsoleh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Talking about Euro huh? I wonder if this channel going to talk about Eurovision too. It's, kinda, sport and geopolitical.

  • @EvilWey
    @EvilWey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Its hard to believe that its that’s stealthy that even modern air defenses will not detect it

    • @onemorechris
      @onemorechris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i guess you only need lay a few seeds of doubt for a short amount of time for it to be an affective killing machine.

  • @producedbypodcast
    @producedbypodcast 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Always interesting topics, great quality and well produced. Wouldn't mind more frequent videos, haha. Thanks and keep it up!

    • @Search-Party
      @Search-Party  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      we're publishing every 2 weeks this summer!

  • @xyzaero
    @xyzaero 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    B-21 is a smooth program, because it is basically improved F-35 technology in a large airframe.

  • @ephinem
    @ephinem 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A 737 is 300m so paying twice the price is not that crazy

  • @jonathannelson9765
    @jonathannelson9765 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    every single intro of this guy gives me chills, what in the world?

  • @IntegrandoConhecimento
    @IntegrandoConhecimento 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    2:20 Sonar sound. Radar emits electromagnetic waves. But I imagine it was a creative choice.

  • @BeastinlosersHD
    @BeastinlosersHD 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Btw there is a bomber vs fighter lobby and old vs new guard in the pentagon . The reality is you kinda need everything in order to be diverse enough to adopt whenever we enter a war and find out what does and doesn’t work

  • @joeyj9638
    @joeyj9638 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The fact that the Raider is being talked about, only mean there’s something scarier in the shadows, lurking, buying it’s time until it goes DOWN!

  • @Presprism
    @Presprism 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Always interesting topic, well crafted storytelling and production. 👍🏻

  • @zukacs
    @zukacs 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    It looks so sick. Cant wait until they declassify this and F35 in 50 years so my jaw drops

    • @Davethreshold
      @Davethreshold 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These are TH-cam/military who know where the secret airframes are buried. After watching these channels for a couple days, your head will spin! I get amazed every day learning about War-Tech. Please look up, F-35, F-22 Raptor, and RADAR. 🖤 www.youtube.com/@SandboxxApp www.youtube.com/@DefenseUpdates/videos

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ready for some Foot-in mouth then?

  • @cnkyy
    @cnkyy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    "worlds only stealth bomber"
    F-117 - "what am i"

    • @AfricanH3ro
      @AfricanH3ro 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Retired for over a decade lol

    • @MrAnt-sf2sk
      @MrAnt-sf2sk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A fighter that doesn’t fight, used for bombing when only carrying 2 bombs

  • @rumchjoe
    @rumchjoe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This video seems dated. The displayed video date is May 16, 2024 but what is the actual date?

  • @Mishn0
    @Mishn0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    @1:40 caption says P-51, image says P-40

  • @notarealperson9709
    @notarealperson9709 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

    meanwhile Russia is sending in meatwaves on top of chinese golf carts to the front line

    • @fivetimesyo
      @fivetimesyo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      And winning...

    • @hostedbysimples5416
      @hostedbysimples5416 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Those are two different philosophies for two very much distinct situations by two different players. Making a comparison as simple as that is pretty much pointless...
      Unless this is a joke and I don't have a good sense of humor... that too.

    • @invertedsounds8112
      @invertedsounds8112 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@fivetimesyo Winning against homemade Ukraine drones 💀

    • @burnttoast9890
      @burnttoast9890 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well one side is obviously winning against the other which is supported by multiple countries

    • @ANONPROFILE001
      @ANONPROFILE001 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@fivetimesyo I mean yeah they have a population 4x bigger...

  • @Fred-eg9sx
    @Fred-eg9sx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B52 is not just a bomber for undefended targets. The main purpose of a B52 is to launch extremely long range standoff missiles that can be launched far outside enemy air defences. The same goes for the B1 Lancer.

  • @Im_MrYaba
    @Im_MrYaba 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

    Maybe I’m missing something but how does 100 planes times $700M per plane come to $203B?

    • @CerebroJD
      @CerebroJD 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

      R&D costs before they actually start producing the actual planes.

    • @hostedbysimples5416
      @hostedbysimples5416 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      As said above: R&D...
      But I believe that the costs of the planes that are made first is way higher than those following it (in principle). They should be constantly tested, modified and well maintained, which implies new infrastructure being build.
      Plus the production and assembly is much more costly at first as it's inefficient.
      I think the 200 Billion is the expected price of all the endeavor, while the 700 Million is the ultimate price of the planes without considering all the caveats.
      Maybe, I'm not a millitary expert...

    • @shaneben8745
      @shaneben8745 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Unit price vs life cycle cost of the program. The 700m is the cost of purchasing the aircraft. The 200B is the projected cost of running the entire program over however many years its planned on operating for, including fuel, parts, salaries, ammunition ect. It's like say buying a car for 20k, but over the 5 years you own it, you'll pay additional money to insure, run, maintain, ans upgrade it, overall coming to a cost much more than the original 20k you bought it for

    • @You_are_Right_
      @You_are_Right_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@shaneben8745I always hated how people talk about what it “costs” and used that as a way to protest a military program. They include everything yet we never do it for a building. It’s called upkeep/running costs. It’s odd to me. everything you said it true.

    • @ricochettheprotogen4928
      @ricochettheprotogen4928 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      R&D costs,adjusting facilities,maintenance

  • @nolanmiller186
    @nolanmiller186 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i love the intro

  • @Cergun_
    @Cergun_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Imagine the amount of spending that could be prevented if humans weren’t hardwired to fight wars for economic, religious, political, ideological, etc… reasons.

    • @daviecrocket9160
      @daviecrocket9160 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That's a world without islam

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@daviecrocket9160 It goes way beyond Islam. It's about De-training people from Worshipping, Comparing to, and Ridiculing others. Basically : Let go of Competition. and start to embrace Cooperation. In ancient times "Cheap labour" was created by enslaving people. Do you want that, to become "Competetive" again?

    • @Mr.KARANI
      @Mr.KARANI 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Humans are not wired to fight but USA is.

    • @2x2is22
      @2x2is22 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, the American defense budget is 10% of all federal spending. So if you were able to get rid of the military entirely, you're really only saving 10%. It wouldn't even be enough to fund this universal healthcare everyone wants

    • @carholic-sz3qv
      @carholic-sz3qv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviecrocket9160 wooooow how pathetic is the comment?! what was the USA doing around the world, in the middle east for decades?! Irac, Syria, Vietnam..... all those useless wars for nothing at all!

  • @saadganie
    @saadganie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Search Party is amazing 🎉
    Can't wait to see the upcoming videos 🙌

  • @Davethreshold
    @Davethreshold 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    That money is NOT a risk. This design will work. Everything that we have designed in the last ten years works as planned.

    • @1ycan-eu9ji
      @1ycan-eu9ji 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Just like the Zumwalt, oh wait

    • @torresthemonster
      @torresthemonster 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Besides the helicopter

    • @2goober4u
      @2goober4u 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@1ycan-eu9ji Zumwalt was designed way more than 10 years ago

    • @robertharper3754
      @robertharper3754 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1ycan-eu9ji, that's the Navy, and they've been "touched in the head" for far too long. They got high on their own supply of BS thinking they're the best and can't be defeated ever, they, like the other branches as well as our government and populace need to wake up and deal with reality.

    • @Flightman453
      @Flightman453 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@2goober4u The point was it failed and wasted billions of dollars.

  • @mbz16v
    @mbz16v 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Fantastic piece of journalism...y'all
    are crushing it!!!

    • @heynicetomeetyou
      @heynicetomeetyou 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is poor journalism since they don't give us options to choose from or encourage us to think on our own, but they give us the answer instead

  • @shahinchoudhury8256
    @shahinchoudhury8256 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Stealth doesn't mean it can't be seen at all.
    Stealth is low observable, meaning hard to detect & very hard to track.
    but low frequency radars can see stealth at a sufficient range to send interceptors.

  • @FeRoOOo71
    @FeRoOOo71 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    10:20 this is how a 9 year old imagines stealth in a plane 😂😂😂

  • @Geremy2Taps
    @Geremy2Taps 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let’s not forget how the 35s price per unit has dropped and is now the most produced and used gen5 fighter

  • @Deshinbidesh
    @Deshinbidesh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Here’s an idea, design a program to analyze insect and bird flight patterns using AI and compare it to jets/bombers. Use it in conjunction with existing radar technology and there you go stealth technology obsolete. I read somewhere that radar picks up everything there’s nothing truly invisible. It’s just programmed to pick up on larger objects

    • @lucasjenkinson
      @lucasjenkinson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Really good idea.

    • @2goober4u
      @2goober4u 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      that's why we still use SEAD and EW systems

    • @chevalier5691
      @chevalier5691 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you can't just use the word AI and expect it to advance exponentially 🤦‍♂️ these things carry bombs and use advanced coating, why would we go back to copying birds

  • @joebangels1
    @joebangels1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is a disgusting us of money, the USA infrastructure is falling apart and people are broke.

  • @user-pp5or5og4k
    @user-pp5or5og4k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    There are way less than 62 operational B1-B. They are broke more often than not. It is also the most expensive aircraft to operate per hour in the Air Force.

    • @chriskerwin3904
      @chriskerwin3904 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They look phenomenal though, it's a shame we never built the Valkyrie for purely aesthetic reasons.

    • @FeRoOOo71
      @FeRoOOo71 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chriskerwin3904the look phenomenal? 😂

  • @DavidWoods255
    @DavidWoods255 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You're the best Sam! Thank you as always for new episodes of Search Party (and lest we forget Vox's Atlas.. you should be really proud of that series - I looked forward to every video and throughly loved them). Ty again Sam.

  • @mmeade9402
    @mmeade9402 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I see a lot of people complaining about this money not going towards infrastructure and schools etc etc
    Thowing money at problems isnt as effective in those fields as it is in the military typically. If they really need a new bomber, they can just print a few billion dollars and it gets done...
    If they however as an example need to replace the bridge to my south that they said needed replacing 30 years ago, they will spend 20 years in court debating whether its necessary, whether its going to be harmful to the weather, whether the slugs in that area are allergic to concrete etc etc etc
    Same goes for the schools. Its not a money problem. Ballou High School in Washington DC for example, in 2022-2023, the school had a chronic truancy rate of 88.5%, meaning 88.5% of the students missed at minimum 30% of the school year, minimum. Yet the schools graduation rate was 70%. How did 88.5% of the class get marked absent most of the school year and 70% of them still graduate?
    To fix stuff like that, money isnt going to help. The school isnt dilapidated and falling apart, and the students arent missing school to go to work the fields or the coal mines, you'd have to send in the national guard, confiscate peoples kids and put them in boarding schools, away from terrible parents and use state discipline. Good luck with that.

    • @historyandstuff16
      @historyandstuff16 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      We got so many shitty people who don’t want to take proper care of their kids these days. It’s really sad to see.

    • @almightysosa3007
      @almightysosa3007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Missing school for enough days will get child protective services called to the house and if they view the situation as unfit for a child they will take the child away. So yes that is the solution sadly, there’s consequences for a reason, when threatening them doesn’t work you have to enforce said consequences.

    • @grisellimay
      @grisellimay 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is such an uninformed view. Throwing money actually would help a lot of issues in this country from education to healthcare to infrastructure. Fun fact, infrastructure improvements can happen very quickly with money and political will but it doesn’t because those who benefit the most from it aren’t the ones making the decisions.

    • @mmeade9402
      @mmeade9402 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@almightysosa3007 Theoretically its supposed to work like that. But in reality that system doesnt function the way its supposed to
      The parents take no part in their education, and even when CPS shows up, the kids are out on the street doing whatever they're doing. Cant take the child away if the child isnt home.
      And somehow they still graduate high school, despite half of the adult American population reading at or below a 4th grade level.

    • @Alphacuremom55
      @Alphacuremom55 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you failed to mention is that Ballou High School is 98% black.

  • @xlostlovex
    @xlostlovex 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A great man once said..
    "Peace means having a bigger stick than the other guy".
    - Howard Stark
    - Father of Tony Stark

  • @Itsmarkyoung
    @Itsmarkyoung 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    “We just don’t have the budget to address homelessness in all major cities right now, we are working closely with local officials to come up with solutions”

    • @oeliamoya9796
      @oeliamoya9796 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was told the same thing here in Florida! I wonder where all the money went....

    • @johnmontag
      @johnmontag 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So much money gets stolen and mismanaged for homelessness and addiction. California has 10’s of billions “lost” that was earmarked for it

    • @IndigoSierra
      @IndigoSierra 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Perhaps the trillions in healthcare spending that disappear into insurance companies might have something to do with that.

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      When it comes to the US, there is always money. The scarcity is in political will.

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IndigoSierra Bingo! We care about insurance companies & health corporations, not people.

  • @michaelpilos
    @michaelpilos 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good analysis.US is brilliant at being proactively strategic!

  • @heynicetomeetyou
    @heynicetomeetyou 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    This video comes with a clear message: We need them. How is it different from propaganda?

    • @ExTern-nl4ov
      @ExTern-nl4ov 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      So every time a conclusion ends with a clear note, its propaganda? Get your definitions right dude

    • @heynicetomeetyou
      @heynicetomeetyou 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ExTern-nl4ov when they call themselves journalists, but in fact they form a specific opinion, this is propaganda.

    • @jakob8922
      @jakob8922 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Usually when people use the word "propaganda" they are referring to something that is trying to trick the viewer into believing something. Propagandists don't typically give a clear message.

    • @BarrenBones-t2h
      @BarrenBones-t2h 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The lack of braincells is quite evident with this one.

    • @Fractured_Unity
      @Fractured_Unity 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The message is clear from the defense department and industry. Unlike Johnny Harris, Search Party basically never tells us their opinions and leaves the viewers to decide on the facts themselves. That’s called journalism.

  • @Stuffaboutstuff555
    @Stuffaboutstuff555 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Every time and every where” made me rock hard ❤

  • @sashazach9387
    @sashazach9387 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    absolutely excellent production quality. Great topic too.

  • @jasongray797
    @jasongray797 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It'll be the perfect weapon forever because since when has technology ever advanced or changed.

  • @JtrainMedia
    @JtrainMedia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Mmm yes. A new Search Party video with my morning coffee. It's a good day!

  • @Lostlife656
    @Lostlife656 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Worth it. Love cool military tech

  • @BigBoiiLeem
    @BigBoiiLeem 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Ah yes, deterrence: the act of holding a gun to our heads and telling us we're safe

  • @MechAnonymous
    @MechAnonymous 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Talk about the tools and mechanics that keep things like tanks going

  • @RenéSaussy
    @RenéSaussy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    This country will do *anything* but give me healthcare 😢

    • @jamiemckenna1663
      @jamiemckenna1663 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The US spends more money on healthcare than the military

    • @TheCrouchingZebra
      @TheCrouchingZebra 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Just get a job looool it’s the responsibility of employers in this country

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheCrouchingZebra NO, their responsability is to make Profits. It's The value of Money over the value ofpeople. Capitalism in a nutshell. Even before USA claimed to be it's sole Servant.

    • @TheCrouchingZebra
      @TheCrouchingZebra 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Gunni1972 you want free healthcare but someone else to work for it… I get it.

    • @TheCrouchingZebra
      @TheCrouchingZebra 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And by the way… there literally is free healthcare

  • @gabriellupisan7003
    @gabriellupisan7003 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This vid came in clutch as I was about to eat dinner

  • @oskrm
    @oskrm 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    4:00 "To defend itself", Bombers, especially stealth ones, are offensive weapons.

    • @matahariamarulhaq4332
      @matahariamarulhaq4332 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Offense is the best defense

    • @lachlanchester8142
      @lachlanchester8142 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Okay? Everything in the military is offensive weapons

    • @thismanagain
      @thismanagain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the USA way.

  • @nicwolf1370
    @nicwolf1370 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not only is the B-21 an absolute steal at that price, but the F-35 is fully cost-competitive with other, non-stealth tactical aircraft. US airo manufacturers are stepping up to the plate. I wonder if they'll export though?

  • @Toes4life246
    @Toes4life246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Song from about 0:50?

  • @MrTrevortxeartxe
    @MrTrevortxeartxe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    $70,000 dollars is "too much," but now it's 92 MILLION. Car dependency is unreasonably expensive.

  • @SandyWolf-
    @SandyWolf- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    What I want is to be civilized and beyond war!

    • @__idan__
      @__idan__ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Tell that to the other guy 😅

    • @thismanagain
      @thismanagain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's bad for business.

    • @SandyWolf-
      @SandyWolf- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thismanagain reality sucks 🤦‍♀️

    • @thismanagain
      @thismanagain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SandyWolf- some have made it that way.

  • @hoovie109
    @hoovie109 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well done, thoroughly enjoyed watching. One small critic, at 1:40 a picture of a a P-40 fighter is flashed on screen and labeled as a P-51 mustang.

  • @hylimm
    @hylimm 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Deterrence? lol that’s more like threats!

    • @woehr6
      @woehr6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Best defence is a good offence

    • @DejiNova
      @DejiNova 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@woehr6you you admit the usa is a warmongering prick?

  • @alexbento3410
    @alexbento3410 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great videos

  • @LizardSpork
    @LizardSpork 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    If you can't speak softly while carrying a big stick then speak loudly and carry the biggest stick.

    • @fivetimesyo
      @fivetimesyo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      America doesn't understand the concept of speaking softly

    • @AnErrantPhoton
      @AnErrantPhoton 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@fivetimesyo The United States understates its capabilities every time they talk about a defense article. "This thing can go x miles per hour with a range of y nautical miles. I won't tell you what the max is though. If I do, I'm lying. It can do better."

    • @churblefurbles
      @churblefurbles 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@AnErrantPhoton Recuitment numbers and the Red Sea say otherwise, the specs are questionable and the stick is hollow.

    • @anon69_q
      @anon69_q 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@churblefurbles How are recruitment numbers correlated with the capabilities of hardware? Also, the bark was worse than the bite in the Red Sea.

    • @BOOZMadre
      @BOOZMadre 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Speak Japanese and Carry a Katana 🗾

  • @vincentx2850
    @vincentx2850 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To frame an extremely expensive offensive weapon as a "need" is really something.

  • @Alejandro.S.Rodriguez
    @Alejandro.S.Rodriguez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    And that’s how war becomes a very profitable business to us companies.

  • @niczim123
    @niczim123 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Continuing the upcoming sports subject that you mentioned, you should consider covering the Stanley Cup Playoffs. The most elusive trophy in all of sports! And this year they've been insane so far it has everything from compelling stories, bad officiating, intense rivalries, miraculous saves, shots, hits and of course fights!

  • @ruftime
    @ruftime 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The Cost over-runs alone will be 200B🙄

    • @IndigoSierra
      @IndigoSierra 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The B-21 program is under budget, ahead of schedule, and on a fixed price contract.
      Literally the one military program that went well budget-wise and people still spout nonsense like this about it.

    • @proxy3386
      @proxy3386 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      also the 200B apparent immediate price tag is not an actual immediate price tag, and is basically the cost of the B-21 Program over its projected lifetime. That includes maintenance, training, weapons, replacement parts, etcetera…

    • @proxy3386
      @proxy3386 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It is the same with the 1.5 Trillion*** dollar price tag with the F-35 Program. That is over its massive projected service lifespan (50+ years) which includes software updates, maintenance, training, and everything else…

  • @2x2is22
    @2x2is22 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:27 Your math seems off. 100 aircraft at $700 million each should be $70 billion

    • @krimozaki9494
      @krimozaki9494 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i think it's the maintenance cost

  • @MKALTRA
    @MKALTRA 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.” - MLK

  • @ThunderApache
    @ThunderApache 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly just leave out the sports bit man, calling Jos Verstappen an f1 legend was a bit weird.
    I love the advanced warcraft technologies or cyber security and electronic warfare, man. All the best!

  • @ericmartin5720
    @ericmartin5720 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It’s easy to waste other people’s money…..

  • @SytzeWiersma
    @SytzeWiersma 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All that effort into education and solving other issues would make murica such a happier place.

  • @Todosthememe
    @Todosthememe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Saying that they are used for U.S. Defense distracts from the fact that we’ve never been in a defensive war. This is for world domination and control not defense

    • @daseinzigwahrem
      @daseinzigwahrem 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Guess WHY you have never been in a defensive war. Everyone is afraid of the US striking back.

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Then you dont understand the art of war and lack foresight

    • @Todosthememe
      @Todosthememe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@diollinebranderson6553 war is peace said Orwell

    • @Todosthememe
      @Todosthememe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@diollinebranderson6553 world domination and control is defense Is your perspective

    • @Tonius126
      @Tonius126 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@TodosthememeThis self flaggulation is disgsting and the definition of weakness. You know what they say, good times creats weak men and you're weak. I'm proud of our military and hegemony.

  • @mike52689
    @mike52689 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is this Johnny Harris or what? Insane video

  • @agnosticbeliever138
    @agnosticbeliever138 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If you don't understand how this video is an advertisement for the defense industry then it was made for people just like you, so that worked out.

    • @jamiemckenna1663
      @jamiemckenna1663 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's literally just explaining US air force doctrine to allow it to maintain its current position

  • @dirkgoldman1155
    @dirkgoldman1155 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sam Ellis is god tier when it comes down to map animations and map aesthetics. When people talk about the so called Vox or Johnny Harris map style then what they actually mean is this guy's work.

    • @pizzaslice3891
      @pizzaslice3891 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The glazing is insane lmfao💀💀

  • @Gwallacec2
    @Gwallacec2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great, more useless posturing and military spending. God I’m so sick of this waste of money and time from our government.

    • @worldofdoom995
      @worldofdoom995 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Useless? To who? Don't like it move to europe for your socialist paradise

    • @juanquireyes6703
      @juanquireyes6703 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Commie propaganda bot 👆

    • @Gwallacec2
      @Gwallacec2 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ I ain’t a bot bish

  • @TravisW8mmck
    @TravisW8mmck 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We were willing to pay more for the B1 almost 30 years ago

  • @firehot427
    @firehot427 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Imagine minding your own business and having an impenetrable air defense and the US considers that a national security risk

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well thats how you stay in the lead🤷‍♂️. If you wanna easily win a 1 km race, train for 10km

    • @lachlanchester8142
      @lachlanchester8142 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You clearly haven’t been minding your own business if you think you need impenetrable air defence

    • @thismanagain
      @thismanagain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They wanna get into everything.

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think production of the B-21 could be a lot larger than people think. We could see as many as 200 planes built because even with the B-52 modernization program, the B-52 is beginning to be vulnerable to a new generation of very long range air-to-air missiles that could attack a plane as far as 400 km (248 miles) away.

    • @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368
      @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's why the next generation of stealth bomber is already being designed. These things take 15-20 years to go from concept to design to funding to development. There are also many phases and variants of the B21 Raider to incorporate new systems to deal with new threats as best as they can.
      For example, with the F35, they started being delivered about 10 years ago with the first block, but newer blocks of upgraded F35s are still being delivered. And the contract was won by Lockheed Martin in 2001. The concept and design phase was back in the early to mid 1990s.

  • @udoyxyz
    @udoyxyz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    isn't it $70 billion? $700 million each * 100 planes = $70 billion. You said $203 billion. If they buy 290 planes, then the math is correct. But they are buying 100.

    • @ZumokuYT
      @ZumokuYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      R and D costs added on

    • @TheDwightMamba
      @TheDwightMamba 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Total cost of operating them for their lifespan. Imagine buying a bicycle and running it for 50 years. You are going to buy some tubes and chains.

    • @Dingusdoofus
      @Dingusdoofus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      R&D and maintenance also contribute to the cost.

  • @MrRebelMan360
    @MrRebelMan360 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basque Nationalism and its ties to Athletic Club Bilbao in La Liga is one of the coolest stories out there and I think would be a great video idea

  • @jbp9653
    @jbp9653 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is why we have so many UFO sightings because planes like this exist for years or decades yet not released to the Public.

  • @wildweasel3001
    @wildweasel3001 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a very determined person, i built my own stealth bomber in the shed. Good luck finding it 🎉

  • @zackthebongripper7274
    @zackthebongripper7274 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People are dismissing this bomber as just a cheaper more modern B-2. NO. This thing has a lot of "special sauce" in every aspect of it's performance. The only thing that is more mundane will be it's engines, until the Adaptive engines become available.

  • @anothernumber9753
    @anothernumber9753 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the distinction between a fighter and a bomber is becoming semantic. Both are becoming stealth aircraft predominantly both can fire from more than 100 miles from the target. Both can hit air or ground targets. Yes fighters are fast but if you plan well the speed is not the most important thing.

  • @davidkeifert19
    @davidkeifert19 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    loving your channel. thanks!

  • @wildweasel3001
    @wildweasel3001 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I never really thought about it but radar is a very defensive posture where as a stealth plane is somewhat threatening by nature

  • @guitarninjarick8179
    @guitarninjarick8179 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We definitely do need it. It's a gamechanger in multiple ways tho more so than a traditional bomber. It's a stealthy sensor platform which translates into an intelligence collector and a targeting node. Also, from a logistical point of view it can operate in theater because the coating of the aircraft isn't as sensitive to the environment and doesn't require as much up keep. We need this plane!

  • @Dsmday
    @Dsmday 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the us spend its money to aerospace exploration rather than military, we would be in andromeda by now

  • @dsimpson530
    @dsimpson530 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The modern equivalent to "Carrying a big stick"

  • @ThunderApache
    @ThunderApache 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bombers are redundant when you have missiles.