Are all Bibles the same? ...this is eye-opening
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- The shocking 3.16 Bible Test
Prefer no music & longer on-screen text? • The 3:16 Test [No Music]
Donate / Support Us (help us make new videos!)
linktr.ee/trut...
Get in Touch
peterson6x@gmail.com
Are you new to the Bible issue?
You may already know that there are people who believe the King James Bible is the inspired word of God. These "KJV-onlyists" are debated, mocked and scorned every single day in both real life and online by other Christians.
Why is there a debate?
Why do so many versions of the Bible exist today? And why do some, such as myself, believe they are ungodly corruptions of His word?
I have a question for you that most will answer quickly, but not meditate on for more than 2 seconds: Is it too hard for God to perfectly preserve (through imperfect men) His words, as He said He would? Think about it. If God can INSPIRE His perfect word through men... why wouldn't He PRESERVE it as well?
The root of the problem is this: most Christians today are enamored by myths and unbiblical beliefs taught by scholars, such as:
1. Only the originals were inspired by God
(The opposite is found in scripture)
2. You must look at different translations to get a better understanding
(Nowhere taught in the Bible)
3. Translations can all be nicely placed on a scale of literal vs figurative
(Completely deceptive since modern versions don't even come from the same line of manuscripts as the King James Bible. Also, the Bible says God's WORDS- not MESSAGES - are very pure)
I encourage you to stop and consider why King James only advocates are so adamant about their belief in a perfectly pure and inspired Bible.
The strange thing is- King James Bible believers actually believe God when He says His words are pure, inspired, preserved and incorruptible.
But- those who mock KJB believers say they believe all those things as well, they just cannot show you or I any Bible in any language as the object of their so-called beliefs. Because they really don't believe God preserved his WORDS.
They believe they have textbooks that can help point them to the truth. We believe we HAVE THE TRUTH in our hands.
The serpent is subtil. And the first thing he does in the Bible (Genesis 3) is question and distort the word of God to mankind. He makes himself the textbook. He confuses you and attempts to cut you off from believing what God actually said.
May I suggest: he is still doing the same thing today. On a much larger scale.
Once you actually look at the differences in the text of the King James Bible (and all Bibles preceding it) vs the modern versions in stores today, only a fool would think newly translated Bibles are "better" because they are "easier to read." They don't even come close to each other in thousands of places. It becomes mass confusion, sometimes saying the complete opposite. And again, modern versions are NOT from the same line of manuscripts as the King James Bible. They are NOT the same bibles.
This video will open your eyes to see how many differences there really are. Using only one reference: 3.16
If you want a deeper study on this topic, I encourage you to watch the following Bible-study/documentary which shows how severe this issue really is: • THE WORDS OF GOD: KJB ...
Thank you for reading, and may the Lord bless you with all wisdom and spiritual understanding as you seek HIM over this matter. And may the Lord Jesus Christ receive all the glory for His perfect word.
Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. - John 15.3 KJB
Reach out anytime!
Brandon P
peterson6x@gmail.com
Reuploaded with a one-letter correction to Nahum 3.16
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Tyndale's bible is purer than KJV.
Why is Tyndale’s Bible more pure then the KJB 🤔
@@wheeliewadethiesen2946 Tyndale paved the way, iirc, enabling the 1611 KJV
@@777-Phil Both of them have thousands of errors as they have removed the name of YHWH from it and the name of his son, Yehsua
@@SG-jv5zi
They didn't really "remove" the name of YHWH, They substituted the name of God with the word Adonai according to Jewish custom. Apparently Jesus had no problem with that custom. Most people were aware of why it was done and had no problem.
In the English translations this translated into the English word "LORde" (Tyndale Bible) or LORD (KJV).
The name of Jesus is present in both translations, The idea that they removed The name of Jesus is a misconception.
Thank you brother for sharing these videos with me. My daughter is 16 and I am trying to teach her that the Bible is not just stories, but the actual Word of the Living God! I don't belong to a church. I have been living a lukewarm believers life and I am changing that. At her age, the world has many distractions and I am up against a lot, but greater is He that lives in me than he that lives in the world! Hallelujah!!!
Oh yeah, my daughter got a little tattoo and I was upset until she showed it to me. To my relief it was 777. I was full of mixed emotions. Anyways, I showed her a video of 777 in scripture. Hallelujah!!! She now knows the Bible is not just stories written by men. All Glory to God in Jesus Christ's mighty name!!!
I love your videos! I have never read any other "version" of the Bible but only to read how corrupt and twisted some of their verses are. So glad I've only read the King James Bible, The Authorized Bible, THE HOLY BIBLE! Amen.
Amazing. The King James Bible will never come back void. All other perversions trace back to the Vatican
How can you, living with so much prejudice, call yourself a Christian?
Nonsense
@@DMScholfieldMost modern bible versions (like ESV, NIV, NASB, etc) are based on the Alexandrian manuscripts (less then 50 manuscripts, mainly codex Vaticanus and codex Sinaiticus) that alter and omit many verses and even contradict each other. The AV/KJV however, is based on the traditional majority text from Antioch; 6000+ manuscripts that all agree in their reading.
Modern versions based on the nestle-aland/ubs text are corrupt.
Dear @@EdwinDekker71 , Hello !
The ESV, NIV, NASB, are not based on the Alexandrian manuscripts. In fact there are no English translations based on the Alexandrian manuscripts. The only Text Type priority NT Manuscripts that have a specific English translation based on them is the Textus Receptus The Majority Text and I think there is a translation based on the old Westcott and Hort Text. I am aware of Most modern translations are based on an Eclectic Greek Text (which is emphatically not an Alexandrian Priority text). The Eclectic Text is based on The Majority texts , The Alexandrian Texts, The Western Texts, Caesarean Texts and the Mixed Texts.
It is a KJV Only talking point, that the the Modern Translations of God's Word use the Alexandrian manuscripts as their source text, but this is a misconception.
It is also a misconceived KJV Only, talking point, that the Modern translations use a corrupt textual source.
The essence of the reasoning for this assertion is that
1. The KJV is the perfect Word of God (a Philosophical Assumption) and uses a perfect textual source text (a false premise),
2. The modern translations do not agree with the KJV, nor do their textual sources agree (their are disagreements between both the English translations and the text sources).
3. Therefore the Modern translations and their Text sources are corrupt because they don't agree with the KJV and the KJV Text Sources (a false conclusion).
Result - Circular reasoning. The syllogism is invalid because premise # 1 in invalid; it is an assumption based upon presumed predetermined philosophical ideology.
No objeciive evidence is presented to conclude that these textual sources are corrupt other than unsupported assertions, ... and nearly all Christian Greek and Hebrew scholars disagree.
The KJV did come from a Greek Text (Basically The Textus Receptus) that used several Greek manuscripts from the Majority Text Family. However, the Textus Receptus is not an accurate representative of the Majority Text Manuscripts, since the manuscripts used for the Textus Receptus were of late origin and poor quality.
There are a couple of Greek Texts made from the Majority Text Manuscripts that better reflect the Majority Text Family, than the Textus Receptus. Those two are the Hodges & Farstad 1982 and Pierpont & Robinson 1991. There have been some English translations made on these Greek texts, and these English translations better reflect the Majority Text than the KJV does. Example: The World English Bible and the Majority Text Interlinear.
There are a great number of differences between the Majority text and the Textus Receptus. A complete list of differences between the Robinson-Pierpont Majority Text and the Scrivener Textus Receptus is listed here:
(www.bible-researcher.com/robinson-scrivener.html
I have not counted them, but there may be over a thousand differences.
The Hodges-Farstad Majority Greek Text differs from the Textus Receptus in over 1005 places. Basically the Textus Receptus is an inferior representative of the Majority Text Family. If you want a true Majority Text Bible Translation, The World English Bible is a much better representative of the Majority Text than the KJV.
You said, "6000+ manuscripts that all agree in their reading."
I assume you are speaking of Greek Manuscripts. There are several problems with that assertion.
1. Currently we do not have that many Greek manuscripts, even if we combine ALL the Greek Manuscripts of all the text families.
In other words, if we add up all the Greek Manuscripts from the the Majority texts , The Alexandrian texts, the Western texts, Caesarean texts and the Mixed texts, we still don't have 6,000 manuscripts.
Dr. Daniel Wallace, director of the "Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts" (CSNTM), just recently said it is hard to get an accurate count (for various reasons) but there are somewhere around 5860 Greek Manuscripts registered at the Institute for New Testament Textual Research at the University of Münster, Germany.
So it there are not 6,000 Greek manuscripts altogether, there are certainly not 6,000 Greek manuscripts in The Majority Text Family.
2. "all agree in their reading".
This is a completely false and very naive statement. There are hundreds of variations among the various Majority text manuscripts. Of course, many may not be very significant variants, but to say they "all agree" is misleading and absurd ! You can use apparatus in the UBS5 to look up all the variations of the manuscripts in the Majority Text Manuscripts. That is what the textual apparatus is for.
You said, "Modern versions based on the nestle-aland/ubs text are corrupt."
That is a KJV Only talking point that is essentially a typically expressed opinion.
Someone could just as easily make the claim that the KJV is corrupt. However with the KJV, there would be sound evidence to support that claim because of the presence of many translation errors in the KJV where the text of the KJV does not accurately translate the Greek text of the Textus Receptus into English. Many of these translation errors are easy to find when one compares the text of the KJV against the Textus Receptus.
If you want examples of translation errors in the KJV, I would be happy to give you an example if you agree to give a response and evaluation of the error.
Be Well, DZ
Another great video by Brandon showing the superiority and inspiration of the KJB over all other corrupt, counterfeit bibles. Excellent job Brandon. I actually preached a sermon before on the 3:16 verses in scripture. Those verses just by themselves as you know are powerful.
YOU SHOULD ALLOW A FEW MORE SECONDS IN BETWEEN TO ALLOW US TO READ THE WRITTEN SCRIPTURES WHEN COMPARING WITH 3 BIBLES....GIVE AT LEAST 5 MORE SECONDS IN BETWEEN.
GREATLY APPRECIATED BROTHER.....LOVE YOUR WORK BROTHER...
I don't want to ever read the devils lies
Thank you for not slowing the video down
Pause it!
@@user-sn5zs9qh4w ARE YOU OK ????
ARE YOU DEMON POSSESED ???
LET THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST HEAL YOU FROM THE EVIL SIRITS THAT ARE IN YOU .........
IN THE HOLY NAME OF YASHUAH .....AMEN....
Amen brother. Love these videos!
One other reason that the KJV uses "begotten" is because Israel is called God's first born son in Exodus:
Exo_4:22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn:
Exo_4:23 And I say unto thee, Let my son go, that he may serve me: and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, even thy firstborn.
So therefore Christ is God's only BEGOTTEN Son...
The false translations have a clear contradiction (as usual) by saying "His only Son".
Love it
And Jesus is the only "direct descendent" (after Adam) of God.
This is such a great ministry! Defense of the KJV is much needed today. The KJV is the infallible, inspired word of God. Another proof in my mind is that the KJV is the only inspired word is that the Holy Ghost would never diminish the deity of Jesus Christ like all the modern versions do.
Amen!! I felt a stab in my heart when I saw what satan had done to the deity in the corrupt versions. There is a King James Bible website that shows many of the perverted verses side by side.
Dear @truthistheKJV, Hello !
How can the "infallible, inspired word of God" have translation errors ?
Actually the KJV is an English translation of the Word of God made by men who did make some mistakes in translation.
I refuse to accept that God made mistakes !!
During the 1600s The Conservative Christians refused to used the KJV preferring the Geneva Bible and they were willing to be persecuted by King James and the other Anglicans . This is why the Pilgrims left England and Kings James' persecution and the persecution of the Anglican Church. They did not agree with infant Baptism and and other doctrines of the Anglican Church. They went to America fro religious freedom from King James and they took there Geneva Bible with them refusing to bring the State produced, denominational Bible of the Anglican Church with them (the KJV).
Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul and the others did not write the KJV. The Holy Spirit moved them to write God's perfect Word. It was the Anglicans that made the KJV.
Be Well, and learn the truth about God's Word verses the translations the traditions of Men of the Anglican Church DZ.
Glory to our Lord Jesus! This is truly eye opening. May God keep unveiling His truth to us because His word is a lamp to our feet.
What audio Bible are you using in this video? I would like to download one for myself.
Much love from Nairobi, Kenya 🇰🇪
KJB = King 👑 Jesus' Bible
Dear @boldasalion6436,
The KJB was authorized by the head of the Anglican Church, King James of England,to be a revision of the Bishop's Bible, using the Hebrew (Masoretic Text) and Greek (Textus Receptus) of God's Word, to become the official Bible for use in the Anglican Church. Those Anglican Bishops did a good job for that day but there are problems in the text of the KJV. If anyone compares the text of the KJV against the text of the Greek Textus Receptus you will notice quite a few translation errors.
I think it is proper to recognize the work of these Anglicans in making the King James Translation of God's Word, But I certainly would not try to make such a comparison of the KJV with Jesus, because Jesus was perfect, but the KJV is not completely perfect.
Be Well, DZ
@@Silverheart1956 I'll go a step further and say NO Bible is "perfect". It is has been elevated to an god-like status. And sadly, satan is laughing at all Churches on earth!
The ONLY inerrant, infallible Word of God is JESUS. His Holy Spirit was sufficient for Noah, Moses, Daniel, Paul, John "the Revelator", etc. He hasn't changed for 6,000 years. There is NO reason we can't rely on the Holy Spirit for Wisdom and Understanding. But, satan doesn't want us to do that. So, he causes Christians to idolize a book written by fallible men; where each Church says, "We interpret it correctly, those guys over there are doing it wrong!".
And may JESUS have mercy on us ALL; for what we are/have allowing/allowed to happen!
Yes the word of God is perfect and that's his book the KJB @@Silverheart1956
@@Silverheart1956 Can you name a few errors in translation, that you mentioned?
Dear@@SlowoZycia. , Hello !! Thank you for the response !
You asked, "Can you name a few errors in translation, that you mentioned ?"
Sure, of course ! I will give you one and you read about it and Check Behind ME ! DON'T believe My words ! It is important fro you to check so you can see it on you own.
Then tell me what you think and I will give you another one. OK !
What I mean by Translation Error
When the text of a translation does not accurately reflect and translate the meaning or literal words, used in the source text.
In this case, the Texts Receptus was used as the primary Greek source text of the NT, to translate the NT into the English text of the KJV.
Gal. 2:21c says"
" ἄρα Χριστὸς δωρεὰν ἀπέθανεν". (Textus Receptus)
Then Christ needlessly died (Literal translation of each word)
Other English Translations
"then Christ dyed in vayne." (Tyndale Bible)
"then Christ dyed without a cause." (Geneva Bible)
"then Christe is dead in vayne. (Bishop's Bible)
"then Christ is dead in vain." (KJV)
"then Christ died needlessly". (NASB)
"Christ died for nothing!”" (NIV)
"then Christ died in vain.” (NKJV)
"then Christ died for no purpose." (ESV)
The issue in this verse is that the Greek verb " ἀποθνῄσκω" (to die) is in the Aorist Past tense in the Texts Receptus, therefore it is necessary to translate the word with the appropriate English word in the past tense in order for it to be an accurate translation of the Greek text.
Of the translations listed above, the KJV, and it predecessor English source text, the Bishop's Bible have translated this Greek verb using the wrong tense. Both of these use the present tense which is not only a translation error, but also changes the meaning in such a way that induces a theological error - Christ is emphatically, NO DEAD ! As Christians we agree that Christ "died", but Christians universally reject the idea that Jesus "is dead", We affirm that Jesus was resurrected !
Translating this verb in the present tense also creates an internal contradiction within the text of the KJV, because there are many places where the KJV affirms the resurrection of Jesus, but because of this translation error in Gal. 2:21c, it contradicts the verses where the KJV rightfully affirms the resurrection.
In defense of the Textus Receptus, the Textus Receptus is in agreement with EVERY Greek manuscript of Galatians we know of, so we have very strong certainty that in God's Word, God said "died"
Bottom Line: Translators do not have the right or authority to change the specific text that "God breathed out" (2 Tim 3:16), including verb tenses, particularly when it changes the meaning of the text, violates primary theological truths and induces contradictions in the Biblical Texts.
This is only one of the many translation errors in the text of the KJV.
We measure the accuracy and validity of Man's Translations against the Word of God.
Be Well, DZ
Awesome! Appreciate it.
Very well done. Right to the point. The King James Bible does not mess around with scripture.
Excellent video brother. The church I got saved in many years ago was KJV only, and I am so grateful and thankful to GOD for that. Blessings from New Zealand
I love this brother's research. I'm gonna buy a lot of his books and deliver them out.
Someone wanted me to watch this video, but right at the beginning the video makes such a mistake, that I could see the creator of the video does not know much about the Scriptures.
He goes to 1 John 3:16 and makes the claim that the other translations are wrong because they are leaving out the deity of Jesus Christ, because they leave out the words "of God".
I guess he does not understand why those words are in italicize in the KJV (I suppose he never read the preface of the KJV).
Read the translation notes so you will not make such foolish mistakes. You will usually find this in the first pages of your KJV Bible (unless it is a cheap, cost cutting printing of the KJV).
Italicized words in the Text of the KJV are interpolations, words that were not in the original documents but were added to the English text. The translators Italicized these words so the reader will know that they are not literally in the text of God's Word.
Most of these words are added to the text of the KJV to make better grammatical and contextual sense in English, but it is important to understand those words are not actually in the Greek (and Hebrew) text of God's word
I though everyone who read the KJV knew this. I learned that in my middle school Sunday School class.
Apparently the creator of the video has very little understanding of the KJV. Teachers should be competent and knowledgable about the subject matter they are teaching !!!
If you the one who watches this video did not know this then you are probably not very familiar with the history of translation of the KJV.
All the translations that he showed that did not have the words "of God", are actually a more literal, and accurate, word for word translation, of God's Word.
Be Well, DZ
@@Silverheart1956 Lol you hate the truth🤪😜
@@Silverheart1956 # 7 Terrifying Patterns ONLY Found in the King James Bible🔥✝️🙌
King James Version:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Genesis 1:1
~First Verse of the Bible - 44
letters, 17 vowels/27
consonants~ First + Last word =7 letters
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.
Revelation 22:21
~Last Verse of the Bible - 44
letters, 17 vowels/27
consonants~ First + Last word
=7 letters
Genesis 2:1-3
King James Version
Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
2 And on the [ SEVENTH ] day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the [ SEVENTH ] day from all his work which he had made.
3 And God [blessed] the [ SEVENTH ] day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
*God blessed the kjv ,God showing the number 7 is Perfect and Holy on his words,Kjv is mathematically perfection and pure word of God without error🔥✝️
*the number seven 7 to God is special because he create heaven and earth 6 and God rest in 7th it is a symbol of holiness, seven main languages the bible has gone through
1.hebrew
2.aramiac
3.syriac
4.greek
5.old latin
6.german
7.ENGLISH
*#7 The English language is the seventh in the translation of the Bible
* #7 The KJV Bible is the seventh of the English Bible
1. Tyndale
2. Matthew
3. Coverdale
4. Great Bible
5. Geneva
6. Bishops
7. Kjv Bible
#7 Kjv it’s so special to God🔥✝️
*#7Bible verse, God Purified his word 7 times and Preserve his word from this generation for ever . God promises to us he Preserve his word on Kjv english language 🔥✝️
* Psalm 12:6-[ 7 ]KJV
The words of the LORD are pure words: As silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified [ SEVEN ] times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, Thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
Psalm 12:6-[ 7 ]KJV
The words of the LORD are pure words: As silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified [ SEVEN ] times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, Thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
* 2 Timothy 3:16-17
King James Version
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
#Pattern (Pure Mentions)
1.JESUS*+ Christ* = 777+777
2.JESUS*+ GOD [uppercase] = 7777
*LORD,JEHOVAH, IM AM,
JEHOVAH, JAH
3.JESUS* #77 [CHRIST#7]…#70x7 [ FATHER & SON ]…#777 [HOLY GHOST #77]
4.FATHER + SON = 70x7 [ BIBLE ]… 7x7x7 [ GOSPELS ]
5.JESUS SIGNATURE PHRASE [ “ Verily I say unto…”] = 77
6.First & Last Words = Amen = 77/ In Amen 777 / In,Earth,The,Amen
7.Words of God =7x7x7 [Genesis 1]…7x7[Matthew 1]
* PRAISE TO THE LORD JESUS CHRIST FOR HIS REVEAL PURE WORD WITHOUT ERROR AND MATHEMATHICALY PERFECTION HE PRESERVE HIS WORD PURE AND PERFECT FOR EVER,KJV AROUND THE WORLD🌍 🌏🌍🇨🇦🇧🇷🇯🇵🇵🇭🇮🇪🇮🇷🇨🇫🇰🇲🇬🇩🇧🇫🇺🇸🇨🇨🇬🇩🇯🇲🇬🇭🇩🇪🇬🇪🇬🇲🇬🇷🇱🇷🇳🇪🇰🇪🇬🇦🇧🇦🇨🇺🇨🇺🇧🇯🇧🇲🇨🇷🇨🇮🇬🇷🇮🇱🇿🇼🇻🇳🇪🇭🇸🇩🇻🇺🏴🇺🇬🇹🇷🇨🇭🇹🇲🇸🇷🇹🇯🇰🇷🇵🇰🇵🇼🇵🇸🔥✝️🙌.
I noticed that as well…
😇😇😇GOD BLESSED ALL
Well, so already the first example strikes me as dishonest.. I hope there's something I'm missing. But when I look at the King James rendition of that verse I see that "of God" is italicized, indicating that those words were inserted by the translators and not present in the original greek. Cross referencing with an interlinear shows the same thing.. so to fault other translations for not including those words doesn't make sense...
Dear @dillxn554
You are correct. Apparently the presenter in the video has failed to conduct due diligene in research to be aware of the misinformation he is presenting.
Usually reaching for a pen comes with the thought of it perhaps not working, but when I see this BiC, I just know it's gonna work. I can see the ink, and I know the ink will come out.
Thank you for all your work teaching us . I love learning more about Gods Word. Which audio do you use for the bible verses please? God bless you Brandon
The best way to translate john 3:16 is "For God loved the world this way: that he gave his unique son"
🤔 AREN'T YOU DOING EXACTLY WHAT HE'S "TRYING" TO POINT OUT? CHANGE THE WORDING? 🤦♂️🤷♂️
@@nicsmada the video is silly.
Any text of John 3:16 other than...
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον ὥστε τὸν υἱὸν τὸν μονογενῆ ἔδωκεν, ἵνα πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων εἰς αὐτὸν μὴ ἀπόληται ἀλλὰ ἔχῃ ζωὴν αἰώνιον.
Is technically changing. Translation requires change of some kind or other.
@@nicsmada or if you prefer an even older Bible in English than the KJV, here's the Tyndale.
For God so loveth the worlde yt he hath geven his only sonne that none that beleve in him shuld perisshe: but shuld have everlastinge lyfe.
@@vedinthorn 1611
@@nicsmada that's certainly a number
I noticed you quoted "17" 3:16s! There is that #17 again!
It is amazing to see how they decided to change the words even though the verses were written in simple, plain English in the KJB. For instance, Joel 3:16
This is evil.
I remember studying the Book of Job not so long ago and getting shocked to see that the NIV had replaced the word "dragon" for the word "jackel."
Bro, that's not even close. 😂
Yes and amen!!!
I truly believe this!
Oh god such a wonderful revelation of holy spirit
I have two KJV Bibles a big one for Home and a pocket travel size that has a zipper for easy open and close.
Alleluia Lord Jesus Christ My Saviour.
What about the greek septuagint the new testament follows the wording of that more so than the kjv old testament
If all the Bibles were the same, they wouldn't have produced. One is all that would be needed.
1. For a new translation to come forth, it must be at least 10% different from the original and all other Bibles.
2. Since 1965, there has been at least 70 modern translations. Imagine the difference each must be not to infringe on another's copyrights.
3. All modern translatons are based from the Alexandrian Texts and Westcott and Hort's "revision" of the Greek New Testament. (Both were secret occultists.)
4. Many are from Nestle and Eland's Graece Novum Testamum, which is now on its 27th revison.
5. The Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, presumably written by the same scribes at the same time, do not agree over 3000 times in the gospels alone.
6. Westcott and Hort made over 8000 changes to their "revision" of the New Testament. Why?
6a. They denied the atonement of Christ at Calvary.
6b. They denied miracles and healings.
6c. They hated the Textus Receptus and King James, admitting they never really studied it.
6d. They were critical textualists.
I truly believe all these translations causes confusion and dumbs down the gospel. I am not against the intention fo these many modern scholars. I believe they have been duped into believing "older is better". What makes it worse is why God would keep His "true Word" buried in archives for a thousand years, denying those Christians the truth?
He didn't.
The devil is subtle. Hath God said was used in the garden and it is used today.
i was going to leave a comment saying that i feel that with most of these verses, you are really just splitting hairs, BUT im beginning to see just how important "WORDS" are!!
Amen. Thank you for your comments as you look into these things.
2 Corinthians 3:16 is one of the greatest examples of the importance of words. Just by changing the word "it", the entire meaning of the text is altered. Your cross-references to Hosea 3:5 and Romans 11:23 are broken. You are left in total uncertainty about what the Holy Ghost declared through Paul.
May the Lord Jesus Christ bless you with His perfect wisdom and grace.
Psalm 12:6
Psalm 119:140
Proverbs 8:8
Proverbs 30:5
Matthew 4:4
Psalm 33:11
Amen. Also keep in mind brother he is only using verses of 3:16. There are 1,000’s of verses that have changes that very often effect doctrine or cause doubt at best.
I'm loving these videos lately. But the John 3:16 verse, the word "begotten." I know a lot of people use that against Jesus and say it means he was a created being. And I only learned this a few months ago, but apparently the Greek word "monogenes" was translated into English as "begotten." But the word monogenes in Greek means "one and only" or "one of a kind." So the translations that say "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son" I think actually have it right. We are all God's sons and daughters by adoption, but Jesus is truly God's one and only Son.
It means only begotten. You don't know Greek.
@David Love More You're right: I don't know Greek. That's why I looked into it. It means one of a kind but you can believe what you want to believe. Have a nice day.
@@Derek-Beaucage There's something wrong with your -genes.
@@Derek-Beaucage I see your point, however; I believe the Holy Spirit moved the KJ translators to include the word "begotten" for best full clarity, so as to emphasize that God through His Holy Spirit is DIRECTLY the paternal father. . . . otherwise, [re: monogenes in Greek meaning "one and only"] could also mean that God had a "one and only" son but that son might have been adopted from somewhere. . . . . which could weaken the fact that the Son was born SINLESS.
Only begotten is the correct one. Without it you have no salvation because then you cannot be an adopted son of God because now you got a contradiction, if God only has one son. You been decieved hunter, you as a hunter were trapped in someones snare. Theres enough in the Bible to prove the divinity of Jesus.
Love the work you do Brandon. Wish I could switch the music off.
Is this word's added in The Bible " yell shell be babtize in the name of The Father, and of The Son and The Holly Spirit " Why I ask is that in The Bible they all babtize in Jesus name only ,because God can not die that is why he send is only Begotten Son Jesus to die for as all .
THE WORD OF GOD
ETERNAL
PERFECT
SPIRITUAL
CREATOR
QUICKENING
WITH THE FATHER & SPIRIT
CAME DOWN WENT BACK UP!
🔥JESUS CHRIST THE LORD 🔥
You had it right about begotten that that word shows that Jesus is the literal Son of God that is removed in most of the counterfeit bibles. It is the man who passes along sin and Jesus had God the Father for his Father and thus he knew no sin.
God inspired and preserve his word on kjv bible on english language 🔥✝️
Dear @johnnyvans_77
If that were true, then why all the translation errors in the KJV ????
KJV Onlyists need to explain that problem !!!!
God does not "inspire" and "Preserve" errors !!
Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Excellent research!
This is upsetting...we're told that some of these translations are word-for-word, and that they have preserved the meaning, and the message...but they are not, and they have not 😢
Here is why...Most modern bible versions (like ESV, NIV, NASB, etc) are based on the Alexandrian manuscripts (less then 50 manuscripts, mainly codex Vaticanus and codex Sinaiticus) that alter and omit many verses and even contradict each other. The AV/KJV however, is based on the traditional majority text from Antioch; 6000+ manuscripts that all agree in their reading.
Modern versions based on the nestle-aland/ubs text are corrupt.
@@EdwinDekker71 thanks for the info. What about the NKJV though? Isn't that supposed to be the KJV with modernized language?
@@EdwinDekker71
Sorry but you need to check your sources of information. Much of what you said in incorrect.
@@Hawke301 Hello !
The NKJV does affirm the Textus Receptus as it's NT source text, and does a fairly good job of replacing obsolete words and correcting some of the translation errors in the KJV. If one really likes the KJV, then the NKJV is a really great improvement over the standard 1769 edition of the KJV, that the vast majority of people use.
Someone who has spent time memorizing the KJV and they don't what to go to another completely different translation of God's Word would be wise to move to the NKJV. For the most part the differences are improvements.
Be Well, DZ
@@Silverheart1956 please explain what was incorrect and what the correct information is, if it is not too much trouble.
Some of these are translational issues where there is genuine linguistic justification for the choices that are made by the non-KJV translators.
Do you understand that most of the new versions are translated from different sources than the KJV? They are not simply taking the KJV and rewording it.
@@lunarrn Yes, I'm quite aware. I've looked into this issue extensively. Many spots where there is a translation difference, however, are not due to textual differences but due various ways where the Hebrew or Greek can be translated into English.
@@sorenpx so you don’t believe God would preserve his Word?
@@lunarrn Straw man argument! We are talking about the Hebrew and Greek grammar.
@@sorenpx No we are talking about how Gods Word was translated from the Textus Receptus and masoretic manuscripts into the King James Bible and it is the preserved word of God in English. If you know Greek then read Greek. If you know Hebrew then read Hebrew. If all you know is English then read the KJV Holy Bible and revel in the living word of God.
I am sorry that I have no money to donate right now but I am grateful for your videos my brother.
4:50
2 Corinthians 3:16
Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.
Nice 😮
I have observed for decades now, how almost without exception mainstream Christianity has ignored Paul's epistles. Not even comprehending rightly dividing 2 Tim 2:15 .
Have you ever done a pattern search on just the Pauline scriptures?
Dear @timamyett9679
Most Christians are never taught hermeneutics and exegetical principles (some don't even know what these words mean). They have never been taught the skills to "rightly divide the Word"
Hey brother, I like the info/video, but the hypnotic music is unnecessary. Its very much like a Pagan Om. Christians ofen find it epic, but its been an occult religious tool for a long time. I don't recommend it. The word of God should produce its own response, not be overpowered with vibration. I came out of EDM music--it is addictive. Bro Spencer Smith hits this hard in his Third Adam documentaries.
ONE OF THE TRANSLATION ERRORS IN THE KJV
I firmly believe we should not change God's Word, So when the KJV changes God's Word I will speak out for God's Truth !
What I mean by "Translation Error"
When the text of a translation does not accurately reflect and translate the meaning or literal words, used in the source text.
In this case, the Texts Receptus was used as the primary Greek source text of the NT of the KJV, to translate the NT into the English text of the KJV.
Gal. 2:21c says"
" ἄρα Χριστὸς δωρεὰν ἀπέθανεν". (Textus Receptus)
Then Christ needlessly died (Literal translation of each word)
Other English Translations
"then Christ dyed in vayne." (Tyndale Bible)
"then Christ dyed without a cause." (Geneva Bible)
"then Christe is dead in vayne. (Bishop's Bible)
"then Christ is dead in vain." (KJV)
"then Christ died needlessly". (NASB)
"Christ died for nothing!”" (NIV)
"then Christ died in vain.” (NKJV)
"then Christ died for no purpose." (ESV)
The issue in this verse is that the Greek verb " ἀποθνῄσκω" (to die) is in the Aorist Past tense in the Texts Receptus, therefore it is necessary to translate the word with the appropriate English word in the past tense in order for it to be an accurate translation of the Greek text.
Of the translations listed above, the KJV, and it predecessor English source text, the Bishop's Bible have translated this Greek verb using the wrong tense. Both of these use the present tense which is not only a translation error, but also changes the meaning in such a way that induces a theological error - Christ is emphatically, NO DEAD ! As Christians we agree that Christ "died", but Christians universally reject the idea that Jesus "is dead", We affirm that Jesus was resurrected !
Translating this verb in the present tense also creates an internal contradiction within the text of the KJV, because there are many places where the KJV affirms the resurrection of Jesus, but because of this translation error in Gal. 2:21c, it contradicts the verses where the KJV rightfully affirms the resurrection.
In defense of the Textus Receptus, the Textus Receptus is in agreement with EVERY Greek manuscript of Galatians we know of, so we have very strong certainty that in God's Word, God said "died"
Bottom Line: Translators do not have the right or authority to change the specific text that "God breathed out" (2 Tim 3:16), including verb tenses, particularly when it changes the meaning of the text, violates primary theological truths and induces contradictions in the Biblical Texts.
This is only one of the many translation errors in the text of the KJV.
We measure the accuracy and validity of Man's Translations against the Word of God.
Be Well, DZ
Lol you hate the truth😂
# 7 Terrifying Patterns ONLY Found in the King James Bible🔥✝️🙌
King James Version:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Genesis 1:1
~First Verse of the Bible - 44
letters, 17 vowels/27
consonants~ First + Last word =7 letters
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.
Revelation 22:21
~Last Verse of the Bible - 44
letters, 17 vowels/27
consonants~ First + Last word
=7 letters
Genesis 2:1-3
King James Version
Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
2 And on the [ SEVENTH ] day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the [ SEVENTH ] day from all his work which he had made.
3 And God [blessed] the [ SEVENTH ] day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
*God blessed the kjv ,God showing the number 7 is Perfect and Holy on his words,Kjv is mathematically perfection and pure word of God without error🔥✝️
*the number seven 7 to God is special because he create heaven and earth 6 and God rest in 7th it is a symbol of holiness, seven main languages the bible has gone through
1.hebrew
2.aramiac
3.syriac
4.greek
5.old latin
6.german
7.ENGLISH
*#7 The English language is the seventh in the translation of the Bible
* #7 The KJV Bible is the seventh of the English Bible
1. Tyndale
2. Matthew
3. Coverdale
4. Great Bible
5. Geneva
6. Bishops
7. Kjv Bible
#7 Kjv it’s so special to God🔥✝️
*#7Bible verse, God Purified his word 7 times and Preserve his word from this generation for ever . God promises to us he Preserve his word on Kjv english language 🔥✝️
* Psalm 12:6-[ 7 ]KJV
The words of the LORD are pure words: As silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified [ SEVEN ] times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, Thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
Psalm 12:6-[ 7 ]KJV
The words of the LORD are pure words: As silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified [ SEVEN ] times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, Thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
* 2 Timothy 3:16-17
King James Version
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
#Pattern (Pure Mentions)
1.JESUS*+ Christ* = 777+777
2.JESUS*+ GOD [uppercase] = 7777
*LORD,JEHOVAH, IM AM,
JEHOVAH, JAH
3.JESUS* #77 [CHRIST#7]…#70x7 [ FATHER & SON ]…#777 [HOLY GHOST #77]
4.FATHER + SON = 70x7 [ BIBLE ]… 7x7x7 [ GOSPELS ]
5.JESUS SIGNATURE PHRASE [ “ Verily I say unto…”] = 77
6.First & Last Words = Amen = 77/ In Amen 777 / In,Earth,The,Amen
7.Words of God =7x7x7 [Genesis 1]…7x7[Matthew 1]
* PRAISE TO THE LORD JESUS CHRIST FOR HIS REVEAL PURE WORD WITHOUT ERROR AND MATHEMATHICALY PERFECTION HE PRESERVE HIS WORD PURE AND PERFECT FOR EVER,KJV AROUND THE WORLD🌍 🌏🌍🇨🇦🇧🇷🇯🇵🇵🇭🇮🇪🇮🇷🇨🇫🇰🇲🇬🇩🇧🇫🇺🇸🇨🇨🇬🇩🇯🇲🇬🇭🇩🇪🇬🇪🇬🇲🇬🇷🇱🇷🇳🇪🇰🇪🇬🇦🇧🇦🇨🇺🇨🇺🇧🇯🇧🇲🇨🇷🇨🇮🇬🇷🇮🇱🇿🇼🇻🇳🇪🇭🇸🇩🇻🇺🏴🇺🇬🇹🇷🇨🇭🇹🇲🇸🇷🇹🇯🇰🇷🇵🇰🇵🇼🇵🇸🔥✝️🙌.
@@johnnyvans_77 You are a troll and your numerology is occultic.
I want to add an important comment to what our dear brother is so very, very good, and all the things. That is research. All the letters in the first verse of the Bible. Add it up plus all the letters of the last verse of the Bible added up. Do that with the vows. The consonants and the words they are all equal except one of those 4 just mentioned now. Add them combining the verses together. All the letters, words vows and consonants of verse one of Genesis last verse of revelation and then go to 1 John 57. And add all the letters address vowel's consonants and words. And first John 5:7 and it will match the sum of the first verse and the last verse of the Bible. Which adds credibility that 1 John 5:7 belongs in the word of God.
1jn3:16 has of God in italic, it's not there in the greek txt. dutch reformation bible doesnt have of 'God'.
θεοπνευστος means God breathed, theo pneustos.
i'm TR only.
to be fair on the first one "of God" was added by the king james translators, it's not in the original texts.
CORRECT !
Amen!
Although i only read KJV, this video confused me more ..lol
So again, take the first verse of the KJV Bible. Take the last verst of the KJV Bible. And add all the letters, all the words. All the vows all the consonext and compare them results with 1 John 5:7, and it will match 100%. God showing you 1 John 5:7 belongs in the word of God.
@brucecummings514
WHAT !!!!
1 John 5:7b in in very few Greek Manuscripts and the ones it is in are late manuscripts of poor quality. 1 John 5:7b is not an authentic part of God's Word, it was added at a later time Under the influence of the Roman Catholics.
You make great videos brother. Come back 😢
Amen
Got it thanks❤
How about Titus 2:13 KJV Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;
but compare virtually EVERY OTHER version;
waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,
Jesus is called God in the ESV, NIV, NKJV.. but the KJV removes Jesus' deity! And it's not the only place where this happens! But the KJV-onliers always quote the verses THEY want to promote.
Dear @tomhanrahan4157. Hello ! Great Point !!
DO you really expect a KJV Only Supporter to bring up the problems in the KJV ?
Like in Titus 2:13, 2 Peter 1:1b is also a similar situation where Granville Sharp's Rule comes into play:
"To those who have obtained a faith of equal standing with ours by the
righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ:" (ESV)
Incredible reveal!
What’s the name of the music please 👍🏽
1 john 3v16 _of God_ is italicized. Its not there in the Greek
Who ever made this obviously doesn’t read Greek nor does he understand how translation should work.
AGREE !! Spreading Biblical Illiteracy !
James wasn’t Jesus brother for no reason. James mean to follow, or to come after. A reference to King James.Let’s go family.
Romans 10:1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Hebrews 1: God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
Hebrews 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
No one can be saved by observing the law.
James 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Who voice is that?
You know I don’t bite
Jesus Christ Almighty God is the King James Bible
Begotten
DOES NOT MEAN PATERNAL
**Please Read this and consider:
One of the greatest travesties of all time is the Translators (including in the KJV) removing the name of the Father YHWH/Yahuah and the son Yeshua...
They replace the name YHWH for lord and Elohim with God
Elohim (god) can refer to YHWH (the Father), Yeshua/Jesus (the Son), angels, or even human rulers as is simply means mighty one.
So, yes, Yehsua/Jesus is God or Elohim, because he is the Son of YHWH...But Yeshua(the son) is not YHWH (the father) He was brought forth from the father and is perfect just like his father.
Consider the term diety is similarity with Royalty. If YHWH is the King and Yeshua is his son (a prince) then of course the son is also known as Royalty
In the same manner Yehsua/Jesus is also diety as he is the son of the Almighty God/Elohim
Take scriptures for what they are, but do not try to conform them to a man made trinity doctrine... it is not biblical and Yeshua himself, of whom we are disciples did not teach this. He is serving the will of his father and even now is serving as our high priest, our mediator between the Almighty God (YHWH) and his creation.
Most modern bible versions (like ESV, NIV, NASB, etc) are based on the Alexandrian manuscripts (less then 50 manuscripts, mainly codex Vaticanus and codex Sinaiticus) that alter and omit many verses and even contradict each other. The AV/KJV however, is based on the traditional majority text from Antioch; 6000+ manuscripts that all agree in their reading.
Modern versions based on the nestle-aland/ubs text are corrupt.
You have proven nothing more than translations differ between them.
Your video does not prove that kjb is a better translation than the others.
This is exactly why "bible study" is so important. It allows you to read any version and still understand His message as opposed to just "reading" the words...
Changing the words changes the message, as you just saw in this video over and over again.
Interesting you say study. Because the King James Bible is the only Bible (because it's God's preserved words) that says we are to study. 2 Timothy 2:15.
All other perversions change that verse and take out study.
Also Jesus emphasized words not the message.
Matthew 24:35 KJB
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
Matthew 16:11 How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?
Psalms 19:7 The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.
Ezekiel 4:12 And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight.
4:13 And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them.
One set of scriptures badly translated in the NIV and many other translations is Daniel 3:18.
Daniel 3:17 of the KJB it says, "If it be so" then verse 18 begins with, "But if not". The NIV's translation of verse 18 says, "But even if HE does not,.."
"But if not," as translated by the KJB is not saying, if God does not deliver us, it is saying, even if you don't throw us into the fiery furnace, we won't worship you!
It's awful that whole doctrines have been made around this mistranslation of this verse!!!
I have a video on my channel that goes into this more in depth called, "An Urgent Message For the Body of Christ!," if anyone is interested 😊❣️
Amen. KJV? No - rather KJB.
The only Holy Bible still being attacked from without and within, and also the believers of it.
KJV only, Amen
KJB only.
The KJV is the only Bible-THE TRUE WORD OF GOD I use and trust-INSPIRED, INFALLIBLE, INERRANT, PERFECT, PRESERVED WORD OF GOD. and not those modern corrupt perversions.
Dear @kjvbiblebelievertal7431
If that were true then why doe the KJV have translation errors in the text ???
That is a problem very few KJV Only Supporters want to come face to face with. They usually go into denial mode without ever honestly looking and the strong evidence.
They affirm their philosophical ideas, above the evidence and facts.
They have the attitude of "don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up". DZ
@@Silverheart1956 LOL, There are no errors in the KJV text. The KJV is the true word of God, you just can't see it because you are blind to the truth and can't see that those modern bible perversions have verses missing and they all don't say the same thing as well as teaching works for salvation. You are confused about the facts and your mind is made up.
@@Silverheart1956 There are no errors in the KJV text. Your attitude is that you are confused about the facts and your mind is made up as well as being in denial. Those modern corrupt bible versions have verses missing and all don't say the same thing as well as they teach a works based salvation which is a false gospel.
Dear @@kjvbiblebelievertal7431 , Hello !
Rather than trading claims and assertions, and making listening to KJV Only Supporters make up doctrines and philosophizing it is probably best to look at the facts.
As they say, "The Proof in in the Pudding" !!
Or as more crudely said (no offense intended), "shut up and put up "
So I will shut up and put up.
Here is one of the errors that you claim does not exist.
Gal. 2:21c says"
" ἄρα Χριστὸς δωρεὰν ἀπέθανεν". (Textus Receptus)
Then Christ needlessly died (Literal translation of each word)
Other English Translations
"then Christ dyed in vayne." (Tyndale Bible)
"then Christ dyed without a cause." (Geneva Bible)
"then Christe is dead in vayne. (Bishop's Bible)
"then Christ is dead in vain." (KJV)
"then Christ died needlessly". (NASB)
"Christ died for nothing!”" (NIV)
"then Christ died in vain.” (NKJV)
"then Christ died for no purpose." (ESV)
The issue in this verse is that the Greek verb " ἀποθνῄσκω" (to die) is in the Aorist Past tense in the Texts Receptus, therefore it is necessary to translate the word with the appropriate English word in the past tense in order for it to be an accurate translation of the Greek text.
Of the translations listed above, the KJV, and it predecessor English source text, the Bishop's Bible have translated this Greek verb using the wrong tense. Both of these use the present tense which is not only a translation error, but also changes the meaning in such a way that induces a theological error - Christ is emphatically, NO DEAD ! As Christians we agree that Christ "died", but Christians universally reject the idea that Jesus "is dead", We affirm that Jesus was resurrected !
Translating this verb in the present tense also creates an internal contradiction within the text of the KJV, because there are many places where the KJV affirms the resurrection of Jesus, but because of this translation error in Gal. 2:21c, it contradicts the verses where the KJV rightfully affirms the resurrection.
In defense of the Textus Receptus, the Textus Receptus is in agreement with EVERY Greek manuscript of Galatians we know of, so we have very strong certainty that in God's Word, God said "died"
Bottom Line: Translators do not have the right or authority to change the specific text that "God breathed out" (2 Tim 3:16), including verb tenses, particularly when it changes the meaning of the text, violates primary theological truths and induces contradictions in the Biblical Texts.
This is only one of the many translation errors in the text of the KJV.
We measure the accuracy and validity of Man's Translations against the Word of God. Do you want to see some more translation error in the KJV.
Be Well, DZ
Dear @@kjvbiblebelievertal7431
"No errors in the KJV text."
Well, ... here is one of the Translation error that you claim does not exist.
Gal. 2:21c says"
" ἄρα Χριστὸς δωρεὰν ἀπέθανεν". (Textus Receptus)
Then Christ needlessly died (Literal translation of each word)
Other English Translations
"then Christ dyed in vayne." (Tyndale Bible)
"then Christ dyed without a cause." (Geneva Bible)
"then Christe is dead in vayne. (Bishop's Bible)
"then Christ is dead in vain." (KJV)
"then Christ died needlessly". (NASB)
"Christ died for nothing!”" (NIV)
"then Christ died in vain.” (NKJV)
"then Christ died for no purpose." (ESV)
The issue in this verse is that the Greek verb " ἀποθνῄσκω" (to die) is in the Aorist Past tense in the Texts Receptus, therefore it is necessary to translate the word with the appropriate English word in the past tense in order for it to be an accurate translation of the Greek text.
Of the translations listed above, the KJV, and it predecessor English source text, the Bishop's Bible have translated this Greek verb using the wrong tense. Both of these use the present tense which is not only a translation error, but also changes the meaning in such a way that induces a theological error - Christ is emphatically, NO DEAD ! As Christians we agree that Christ "died", but Christians universally reject the idea that Jesus "is dead", We affirm that Jesus was resurrected !
Translating this verb in the present tense also creates an internal contradiction within the text of the KJV, because there are many places where the KJV affirms the resurrection of Jesus, but because of this translation error in Gal. 2:21c, it contradicts the verses where the KJV rightfully affirms the resurrection.
In defense of the Textus Receptus, the Textus Receptus is in agreement with EVERY Greek manuscript of Galatians we know of, so we have very strong certainty that in God's Word, God said "died"
Bottom Line: Translators do not have the right or authority to change the specific text that "God breathed out" (2 Tim 3:16), including verb tenses, particularly when it changes the meaning of the text, violates primary theological truths and induces contradictions in the Biblical Texts.
This is only one of the many translation errors in the text of the KJV.
We measure the accuracy and validity of Man's Translations against the Word of God.
Be Well, DZ
When people make statements regarding the KJB as being the only inspired word of God, they are inadvertently placing God in a box of limitations. God is far greater than all of your religious, mental limitations. It reminds me of those who are so narrow-minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes at the same time.
So are you advocating for the modern translations, that they too are accurate and inspired, when they clearly contradict the King James .
@@nzbrotrev9028 I fail to see where these "contradictions" appear. The essence of the Gospel message is replete throughout the vast majority of translations.
@CanadianAlieninthePhilippines But I say unto you , That whosoever is angry with his brother WITHOUT A CAUSE shall be in danger of the judgment: Matthew 5 v 22 KJV .
WITHOUT A CAUSE , is missing from the modern translations, my king James tells me that I can be angry with a brother so long as I have a reason , your modern translations says you can't be angry, and if you are your in danger of the judgment , so one says you can the other you can't, that's a basic contradiction, my Bible teachers us the Jesus never sinned , the modern versions sew doubt by removing WITHOUT A CAUSE , because Jesus gets angry in Mark 3v5 , my Bible tells me that Jesus is the : only BEGOTTEN son , your Bible contradicts that and says : only son , that is a lie , a lie that robs me of who I am in Christ , because Roman's 8 v14 says we are sons of God , I could go on like this all day , the Modern translations are rubbish.
Woe, did you watch the video? Clear doctrines are changed throughout. God is not the author of confusion.
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 is the gospel (good news). John 3:16 does not have the RESURRECTION. Without the resurrection you are a saducees (sad you see).
Different versions and wordings same meaning
All other versions will lead you to hell.
Don’t be silly 🙏🏼
Strobes to much. Can't watch.
Put an epilepsy warning Damn!
Some say the KJV Bible is hard to understand... But it's not meant to be easy to understand... Search the scriptures.
The problem with monetizing your channel is that you just promoted Mormonism. Indeed. Don't be a hypocrite - demonetize today and count the cost of your love for Him.
Did you have to pay to watch this? I did not.
@@lrwhit6456 Yes, it was a Mormon ad.
@@desertdinghy9833 There was an ad before the video - an ad promoting the Mormon Church.
@desertdinghy9833 That's good for you, but I got a Mormonism ad. I'm not lying.
@desertdinghy9833 I'm very, very calm. But thanks for the clarification.