“Now Going To Be Held To Account!” Dangerous Cyclists To Face Same Sentences As Motorists
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2024
- New Government rules will clamp down on cyclists by giving similar sentences to motorists for committing dangerous offences.
The law will see cyclists who kill or seriously injure a person because of dangerous cycling, face the same penalties as drivers and motorcyclists committing the same offence.
As it stands, a cyclist who kills someone can only be sentenced to a maximum jail term of two years, while a motorist can be given a life sentence.
Talk’s Mike Graham is joined by lawyer and road safety campaigner Nick Freeman to discuss the new legislation.
Nick says: “We are going to see a change in the behaviour of cyclists… because they are now going to be held to account with very serious consequences.”
Click here for more from Talk talk.tv
If you need any help visit: talk.tv/helplines
#cycling #motor #roads #crime
Watch the Deliveroo riders scatter
Cyclists are the scourge of every city in Britain. They never obey any of the road laws- and know that they don't need to, as they're unidentifiable.
All bikes should have number plates, pay road tax and be forced to take out insurance, like other road users.
If they don't like it, they can walk.
😂 a sweeping generalisation if there ever was one.
Road tax is based on emissions so they'll pay nothing.
Like in no other country.
You mean car drivers that can't can't drive
Uk road tax is from your council tax.
Most cyclists don’t have any driving licence, so how does that work? All cyclists over 16 should have to take a Highway Code test.
Good luck with enforcing cyclists over 16 to take a Highway Code Test. There are some cyclists who are responsible road users but there are more who don't care at all.
I think that you will find most cyclist also use a car too.
You don't know very much
Actually they have to pay road tax😊
@@rasheedkesington7506 no one pays road tax. vehicle excise duty, and not all cars pay that too.
Roads are for car not for non drivers....
I think that you will find that the horse and cart were first, then the cycle then the car. The car is the true menace. How many deaths, injuries per year are caused by motorised transport to that of a cycle? Your opinion is as valid as anyone else's, but the facts always outweigh opinion.
Thats not what the law says though is it?
No roads are for the movement of people
85% of adult cyclists are also drivers.
Road are for bikes, not for cars. U too fat can’t cycle can u
Its about time they think they own the roads and they still ride 2 abreast
We do own the roads the problem is you can't actually drive
@@wrightwoodwork 🤣🤣
2 abreast is the advice in the government cycling code actually. Stops drivers trying to squeeze through when they don’t have space. Try cycling in the uk and see how much you feel safe
@powdamunki I do cycle in the UK and there is a lot of lycia clad ponces who only abide by their own rules
Maybe also when the cyclists all jump, the red lights they should get a fine. Oh I forget, Khans got rid of all the police in London
There's a fascist
Khan?
I think they should be penalized when they are wrong and be forced to pay for third-party insurance, because many people run over pedestrians and drive away, leaving the pedestrian on the ground without assistance... They should definitely be penalized....
In the first few minutes of the video when the pedestrian wandered into the cycle lane the approaching cyclist,who collided with him, had plenty of time to brake but like a lot of cyclists he just powered along not looking out for obstacles and lots of cyclists are like that. As long as they ignore all the other people,cars etc around them so they can go on their way. Some cyclists just don't seem to be aware of everything around them and that's when accidents happen. Many videos on TH-cam show cyclists being in accidents because they don't read the road.They don't see vehicles indicating,they ignore traffic signals and sometimes even ride on the wrong side of the road and the wrong way down one way streets. They are in their own world and on their journey and nothing else matters as long as they can get to their destination as fast as possible. If it was law to take a riding test similar to the driving test about 75% of riders would fail .
What about cyclists who drive. What percentage of them would pass?
In the video you mention the cyclist was just going too fast near such dense pedestrians, which is his fault, but it is also the fault of the infrastructure. A fast cycle lane should not punch straight through a busy pavement. Cyclist totally wrong there though. It's a zebra crossing.
Neil, calm down.
Drivers killed or seriously injured last year was 30,000. Get some perspective
I cycle and I drive. When I'm doing either, I certainly don't ignore other road users or pedestrians. When I'm cycling I'm very much aware that in any collision with a pedestrian or a vehicle I'm going to be injured or killed. I had a cycling acquaintance who was killed in a collison with a pedestrian. So when I'm cycling I try to anticipate any potential situation that could lead to a collision. There are of course cycling accidents when a cyclist fails to anticipate a potentially dangerous situation, but that is also true for drivers.
You mention ignoring indicators. An indicator only shows an intention for a driver to move or turn in that direction. They still have to give way to any traffic inclusing cyclists whose path they would cross. That includes cyclists filtering on the inside of cars in a traffic queue as specifed in the highway code.
I am a carer ,the person i care for is wheelchair bound. Last August we were crossing at a pedestrian crossing, i pressed the button the lights went red.we were half way across when a cyclist over took the STOPPED TRAFFIC as the lights were RED and crashed into my client, as he went over his handlebar he hit him whith his helmet and feet leaving him with a gashed head wound a broken cheek bone black eye and abrasions to his body. He hit us at such speed he tipped the wheelchair over, GUESS WHAT HE SAID " YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN ME AND STOPPED LOOK AT THE STATE OF MY BIKE". He then disappeared car drivers got out helped us and his wheelchair upright and took us to hospital. If that had been a car driver he would have been charged. WE HAD NO WAY OF TRACING HIM, Surely this must CHANGE.
The arguement that cyclists take up too much road space is incorrect. A road is used to convey people and cars are the most inefficient way to do this. You can get 7 times as many people down a traffic lane per hour as you can in cars, which is why would space is being transferred from cars to cyclists, as it increases the carrying capacity of the road.
I didn't ask for bloody cycle lanes average speed in London 4mph . What a waste of time if you can't drive with other road users just hand your licence in
Agree, if there's a cycle lane use it. I travel into a big city most days for work and part of our dual carriageway is full of cyclists even though running parallel is a cycle path - you can see it from the road! It's bonkers! One cyclist even leant on a car at a roundabout when the traffic came to a halt! Talk about taking liberties?!
Cyclists do use cyclelanes, if they are safer than the road and not significantly slower. Sadly most cyclelanes in the UK are more dangerous than the road and are almost always slower, which is why cyclists don't use them. The government has recently consulted with cyclists to find out why they don't use them and has published a set of minimum standards for cyclelanes. That includes being segregated from both pedestrians and motor vehicles, equal prioirty to the road through road junctions and no obstacles such as stret furniture and chicanes. Hopefully therefore new infrastructure will be safer and quicker to use and in time, the exisitn cycle infrastructure will be brought up to the new standards. One problem that maybe more difficult to solve is that cyclepaths quickly become covered in debris including broken glass which easily causes punctures. One advantage of cycling on a road is that the road traffic sweeps debris away.
Two 'experts' playing 'Ain't it awful' and 'Something must be done'.
How are you going to write a ticket for a cyclist if they don't have to have a license and registration?
How are you going to regulate bicycles in any way while they have the same legality as pushchairs? They can't even stop cyclists and skateboarders stunt riding in designated pedestrian areas.
I think Nicks opinion on using the cycle lane is mandatory clearly shows he is not a cyclist, which is fair enough BUT what he fails to mention is in most towns (note towns not cities) the council provides a cycle lane/path (sustainable transport box ticked) and then completely fails to maintain them, they end up filled with all sorts of debris, glass, potholes etc actually making the roads safer.
Cycle lanes most are not up to scratch to narrow for 2 buy 2
so why are there no PO LICE at traffic lights stopping and fining those who go through red lights,
Outside cities the roads are so full of potholes that they are dangerous for anyone who uses them, cyclists ride close to the side of the road which seem to be worse. Agree that they do believe themselves above the law particularly following changes to the Highway Code.
@@Sparkly14 most of the changers were not changers cyclists have bee allowed to ride 2 by for many years
on pot holes I have had 2 crashes caused by pot hols I sued the council both times and won,
Mandatory insurance too.
They are actually, calmly debating, banning cycling!
What would you have to moan about next. It ain't ever happening.
In my town cars park in the cycle lanes on a daily basis, and cyclists generally go right down the centre of the roads, weaving in and out of traffic and ignoring traffic lights. 🤷🏻♀️
I passed my car driving test ,after 25 lessons ,the first time after riding a bike for 20yrs. Being aware of traffic and the highway code helped. Most cyclists are just people on bikes without any road knowledge or sense. For eample, the guy who was jailed for 2 years for riding a track bike without a front brake and a fixed rear wheel didn't know,allegedly, that if you ride a bike on the road you must have at least a front brake. He shouldn't have been on a public road with a fixed gear track bike without a front brake at all and now a person is dead.
There are lots of rules that drivers seem to be ignorant of too. e.g. Not using the handbrake when stopped in traffic queues. I agree that ignorance of the law is not an excuse, but I don't find it that surprising that a cyclist didn't know that he had to have brakes on both wheels and not just one. Many cyclists only use the rear brake, as using the front brake too aggressively can easily pitch the rider over the handlebars. You've also omitted the fact that the pedestrian killed in this incident was using a mobile and stepped out in front of the cyclist without looking.
Cyclists have not been held accountable since the 1850s. Time for a change.
There's an infamous case circa 1880 in which the judge declared cyclists must travel on the road.
This is an absolute non-story. The law was outdated as has been recently discovered due to deaths caused by cycling. There wasn't really an applicable law for which carried the gravitas to match the incident. Ultimately as a road user you are responsible for the more 'at-risk' road users which in the case of cyclists is pedestrians, and horse riders. The law is simply being updated.
Who's going to catch cyclists not using the cycle lanes!!!
At red lights, when I'm trying to cross ...I find a foot out does the trick 🤨😂
the bicycle fairy 🧚♂️
Why would anyone want to catch them, as there is no law requiring cyclists to use cyclelanes, anymore than there is a law that drivers must use motorways.
Now go and arrest “ the Jimmy Savile of Cycling please
Rage bait mates distraction 101 theres real issues they don't want us talking about.
About time too, they need to pay some road tax and be insured, they do some pretty stupid things whilst on the roads that takes my breath away but if you hit them you would be to blame.
You don't even pay road tax
We all pay road tax- it comes from your council tax. So the average cyclist causes far less damage and pollution than you do for their road tax. 30,000 uk deaths or injuries from motorists last year and this is the thing you loose your mind over?
@@wrightwoodwork don't I, I take it you have a crystal ball then but you don't either by the sound of you but I think you should, please don't fall off your bike
@angelafensom2941 you're not very clever road tax does not exist its called ved and is based on emesions nothing to do with roads
@@wrightwoodwork Cyclists are a menace on the roads in a busy city, and like any road user should be covered by insurance as cyclists have caused injury and deaths of pedestrians. I am sick of their get off free ticket, and please take into account the cost of putting in all those bloody bicycle lanes .
finally. especially for the cyclists that cycle next to each other and then you cant overtake.... while they have a chitchat
2 abreast is in the highway code- stops idiots trying to close pass when they don’t have room. Actually it doesn’t
In 2022 in the UK over 1700 deaths caused by motorists. That same year only 1 death was attributed to a cyclist.
It still won't please some
Cycle mikey he takes the law into his own hands he cycles dangerously.
I haven't seen any evidence that he cycles dangerously, but he does a superb job in sending footage of driving offences to the police so that they can prosecute. If te police weren't so undermanned, no doubt they would do it themselves.
Ban bikes.
Apart from medical supplies & hot fast food deliveries.
Ban you breathing
@@yamahajog04
Sounds like you've lost the argument, mate.
@@danielrawlings8355 i wasted your time
@@yamahajog04
Worry not.
Selfish bikers waste my time & endanger themselves & others every day.
@@danielrawlings8355 wasted more of your time
I jump every red light.
This won’t change anything.
It’s the youth who have powerful electric bikes which the government should have banned.
Our country sucks.
Cycling is selfish.
As Captain Mainwaring would say "Stupid Boy" lol..
@@davenicoll43
Cycling is selfish.
Lorries & coaches must be prioritised as they provide goods and services for multiple people.
@@danielrawlings8355 So car driving is selfish...you do not have a valid argument..
@@davenicoll43
Cycling is selfish.
Lorries & coaches must be prioritised as they provide goods and services for multiple people.
@@davenicoll43
Perhaps Captain Mainwaring was referring to bikers.
Yes, all we need is more regulation🙃