Michael Foot interview | Labour Party | Party Conference | TV Eye | 1981 | Part 2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
  • TV EYE's Llew Gardner interviews Michael Foot, leader of the Labour about unity, policies and the effectiveness of the Labour Opposition to the Tories in the year ahead. Including leaving the EEC, Nuclear weapons and the welfare state.
    First shown: 01/10/1981
    If you would like to license a clip from this video please e mail:
    archive@fremantle.com
    Quote: VT25538

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @zeddeka
    @zeddeka 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Michael Foot's nephew, the famous journalist Paul Foot, said that Michael Foot became a "kind of living parenthesis" during this period. He had to talk out interviews and waffle during replies to fill air time so that the interviewer wouldn't be able to pin him down on party divisions, because they were so bad.

  • @zeddeka
    @zeddeka 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Michael Foot being diplomatic about Tony Benn here. He was reported to have said to him in private 'You're nuts'.

  • @cactussauce3452
    @cactussauce3452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent. A tragic figure in Labour Party history. I honestly feel that Benn did as much damage as the SDP did to Michael Foot and he was his supposed ally!

    • @insertclevername4123
      @insertclevername4123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The more I watch news coverage and documentaries about the period, the more struck I am by similarities (certainly in terms of tactics) between Benn and people like David Owen, even though I tend to agree with Benn's politics much more.

    • @zeddeka
      @zeddeka 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@insertclevername4123the thing about Tony Benn is that he was pulling a direction totally different to the way the country wanted to go. As Denis Healey said of Benn "If he had been right, Thatcher would never have got elected in the first place". Interestingly, Tony Benn's legacy is perhaps most visible now in the Tory party. His arguments about Brexit were repeated verbatim by the Tory Brexiteers. Benn's changes in "internal party democracy" to make the unrepresentative and non democratically accountable party members decide who the leader is have also been adopted by the Tories - resulting in Truss and Johnson.

    • @insertclevername4123
      @insertclevername4123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zeddeka [ETA: After hitting post I realized just how long and rambling this is, so if you want to bail now, no-one--myself included--would blame you.]
      I think I largely agree with you. For me--especially after listening to clips from Benn's diaries on YT and seeing his interviews--it's weird to me that he either didn't recognize or didn't care how much the Overton window had shifted to the right under Thatcher (or Reagan for those of us in the US), or even how much it had started under Callaghan. And even if he did recognize it, he seems to have thought that the solution wasn't to learn the lessons of what had gone wrong and what the people who were winning general elections were doing so as to gradually shift things back in his direction, but rather to replace it all if people would just listen to his speeches (I think it was Kinnock who said that even if he never admitted it to himself, Benn felt like he had a birthright to be a leader).
      As for internal democracy, I don't think you could put the genie back in the bottle, but maybe there are ways to tweak it so as to avoid the outcomes of people who are or should be unelectable winning the leadership...maybe a modified electoral college--not like Labour had in the 80s, but something simpler, like the parliamentary party and the party membership both being counted, with the parliamentary vote being weighted so heavily that the party membership could only sway a close election rather than handing it to someone who managed to lose by less than all of the other also-rans.

  • @thelasttimelord7550
    @thelasttimelord7550 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This man would have made a fantastic Prime Minister. True socialist and Pragmatic

  • @buddha1736
    @buddha1736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Had to switch of early, the interviewer keeps butting in and not letting him get his point across, they never seem to do that with the conservatives. 😉

    • @zeddeka
      @zeddeka 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What utter nonsense.

  • @andybray9791
    @andybray9791 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A Michael Gove and someone else but different

  • @davelowe1977
    @davelowe1977 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    He was an interesting character.

  • @edwardalexander9486
    @edwardalexander9486 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think leaded fuel has had a major influence on children from the 60s/70s. Compare Foot's insight and articulate debate to Johnson now. Remember that Foot was a failed politician but still clearly towers over Johnson.

  • @stuartwilliams-fw4vo
    @stuartwilliams-fw4vo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The brilliance of Footie!

  • @sevenscounty409
    @sevenscounty409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The longest suicide note in history.....

    • @Da1Dez
      @Da1Dez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Until 2019

    • @christopheroshea9799
      @christopheroshea9799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well Blair caused the biggest homicide note in labours history

  • @AlJalandhari
    @AlJalandhari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    People forget how hated thatcher was in these days, and how well like foot was. Unfortunately Galtieri lost the Falklands war and made thatcher more popular than Foot.

  • @paulbrownrigg5109
    @paulbrownrigg5109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great historical material, thanks for uploading this

  • @danielmurray1490
    @danielmurray1490 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the orginal Brexiteers

    • @zeddeka
      @zeddeka 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He actually changed his mind in later years

    • @danielmurray1490
      @danielmurray1490 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @th8257 did he really this is not widely known

  • @wilsonfisk6626
    @wilsonfisk6626 ปีที่แล้ว

    Callaghan should have stayed on.

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 ปีที่แล้ว

      Callaghan was throughly disgusted with what had gone on at Party conference and wanted out

    • @wilsonfisk6626
      @wilsonfisk6626 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@briandelaney9710 I didn't know that. Care to expand?

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@wilsonfisk6626he was not in agreement to the changes in party governance (Electoral college , deselection of MPs ) and disgusted with the infighting in the party especially from the Bennite left and was saddened by the SDP split

    • @wilsonfisk6626
      @wilsonfisk6626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@briandelaney9710 I read up on it. I understand now. I'm a Benn fan, but the electoral college bullshit was ridiculous.

  • @sanchog5704
    @sanchog5704 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this Jeremy Corbyn??

    • @moran68
      @moran68 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s his dad .

    • @AlJalandhari
      @AlJalandhari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      00:42 you think Corbyn ever had those approval ratings? Bloody SDP split and Falklands war turned things around for thatcher