Just found your channel and i can legitimate say this channel feels like a youtube version of "Magics biggest secrets finally revealed" series and i love it By the way i definitely notice the pouring into the glass was incorrect before you explained it. It was coming out more like a batter/paste rather than milk which pours like water
Tbh the first trick was really obvious. Even I, someone without any expertise in illusions, was able to guess the solution. I'm honestly surprised, and a bit disappointed, that Penn said both tricks fooled them.
this is not the same version as the one done on fool us, in FU she inserted the rod vertically, I think it was made specifically to discard this method
I would get suspicious when the magician says she has to come back to that trick later. I believe many other people would be suspicious also. Why can't you do the trick now? Why are you going to come back to the trick later? When something is not how something normally happens (in this case delaying pouring the milk), you can guess that the trick needs it. A good trick is performed in a way that you would normally do that thing, in this case pour the milk in a glass without coming back later to pour more milk.
all these videos to explain are poor attempts, even if the glass had a hole, wouldn't the silicon spell? does it really harden in 1 min? or 1 hr? how come it didn't harden during in the jug etc etc. , also if there is a flap in the big jug, do you have any idea how to move a flap that can hold liquid (to solve this alone require you to be n inventor )
@@3dmagictricks The part about the silicon not hardening in the jug was clearly explained in the video. As for the silicon not spilling through the holes in the glass, you could avoid that with simple gaskets
@@2rare2die100 I guess I'm trying to say everyone overthink these . Its much simpler. The problem is the show edit out parts and add parts from pre show. So you get the impossible version on tv. Let me just say that he first vanishing milk jug is very similar in method to the glass , its more of craftmanship and less chemistry
well one thing u missed with the jug yes there is a flap but the flap is set loose by the handle if u look in slomo u see that the bottom connection is a bit thinker and looser then the top part , with the glass u are a bit right and a bit wrong , the glass looks like real glass but is in fact also a type of silicon , how do i know that a normal glass isnt that thick at the top part , and the glass doesnt reflect as much as normal glass , in fact just poor the glass in a mold with a rod in it then u have holes in there , the holes are cover with celofane , cause or else the silicon milk she puts in the glass would go thru the holes , the thing is with glass like silicon , if u put other silicon in it it reacts chemicly to it and hardens , the celofane is breached by the rod to let it pass the middle .
This was a cool trick and I think Helen's father came up with a new way to pass a rod through a glass. Penn & Teller respect new ideas and were fooled by the new way the trick worked.
There's hot milk in the other half of the pitcher keeping the silicon in liquid form. Once the silicon is poured into the room temperature glass it solidifies.
I'm with the people who don't think Penn and Teller were fooled. I have no problem with the video. If you take a trick or national TV, you know it will be broken down and analyzed.
It doesn't matter what you think. We saw the episode and know that Penn and Teller was fooled. In fact they were fooled all 5 times Helen did her magic.
For goodness sake people, Penn and Teller have to make an assessment of how they did it live, within a few minutes, with no re-watches, slow motion or zoom ins, or time to research and consult others. All of which are available to ACE and others who make such videos.
th-cam.com/video/akJ3an_DFWA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=is41Pyxd-fFvzANS But how does she do this one?! It’s driven me bonkers since that Fool Us episode. Is it the same kinda gimmick? With a ‘rod’ going vertical through not milk? Also, love this video. It’s an elegant concise description a skeptic magic judge like me needs when caught obsessing over a trick. Thank you for sharing ❤
I love all the people in the comments section that like to talk about how obvious and easy the trick was to figure out *on a video revealing it.* If it was that easy for you to figure out, _why are you here?_ You searched for a video revealing the secret to an obvious trick, and chose to view it, because it was so easy? What, was it that you wanted to check and see if you were right? If it's that easy, you should've been certain. Worse yet, did you do it specifically to post a comment about how obvious the trick was because you want people you don't know to think you're clever? Yeesh, is your self esteem that low? I mean... I'm honestly trying here, but I genuinely can't think of a single, logical reason that wouldn't mean you were either an insufferable tool or an outright liar...or possibly both.🤔😅 Either you didn't know how the trick was done until you watched this video, which would mean you're lying because you want to feel less dumb, and that's just sad. But, on the other hand, if you knew how the trick was done and you came here and to brag about it to strangers on the internet, that's even _more_ sad, and someone of your intellect should be secure and confident...and also ashamed of themselves for stooping so low to get a self esteem boost they shouldn't need. 🤦♂️ Either way...maybe review your choices in life, and consider getting a hobby. 👍😂
It is really sad that people try to spoil others work just for clicks, it is even worse when they almost always get it so very wrong (just like this time). Instead of trying to spoil others work, if you are really so very clever, why not create something from scratch.
They try very hard to not reveal the tricks, going to pretty crazy lengths some times to do it. I think this might be a case where if they had said anything about how it was done, or even what they wanted to check, then the trick would have been a very easy give away. So since they wouldn't do that out of professional courtesy, they had to say fooled us. Anything else would have ruined her trick on a nationwide scale. They for instance couldn't say, id like to look at the pitcher, or, ask, can you do the trick if the glass is turned by me randomly before you put the box sides on. Doing so would have completely given away the trick
That's not entirely true. They wouldn't simply choose to let her win "out of professional courtesy." She's a magician, going on a show attempting to fool magicians. Professional courtesy is a fine idea, but if you tell a magician "I'm going to do a magic trick, see if you can figure it out," you're issuing a challenge. Likewise, if you make that statement to a magician, then you _want_ them to tell you if they know how you did it. It's vital for a magician to know how effective their routines are - it's their livelihood. Additionally, your reasoning is flawed. I have seen Penn ask several performers if he could examine a prop to indicate that he knows how a trick was done. There's an important distinction that you're missing. There's no secret that she's using gimmicks and gaffs. That's obvious to literally everyone. Otherwise the trick would break the actual laws of physics. It's not about knowing that she's using a gimmick, they would have to know which items were gimmicked in exactly what way to say that they knew how the trick was done. That's a distinction I have also heard Penn make. So yes, the glass or the wand (or both) _had_ to be gimmicked. The same is true of the two pitchers, when she poured the milk from one to the other and back - one, the other, or both had to be a gimmick. In order to say that she didn't fool them, though, they would have to know which props, specifically, were gimmicked, and they would have to know how. The pitchers absolutely did not fool them, and I'm sure that they had some idea of how the glass trick works. But they won't deny her the victory unless they know exactly how every step was done. ...you don't have to agree with me, I'm just sharing information. You can do what you want with it. Please, though, don't think that I'm trying to insult, belittle or offend you. I'm genuinely just offering another point of view. The fact that I think you happen to be wrong in this set of circumstances doesn't mean that I'm insulting you. ✌️
@@SevenTheJester I believe the professional courtesy is for her father. He's in his 90s, is a famous magician, & is the one who creates the tricks. Penn & Teller know him professionally but also personally, enough to visit him at his home at least. So P&T might not scrutinize her act as much as they may scrutinize other's, in order to honor her dad. Like you said, they've often gone on stage to study magician's props, but they've never chosen to study hers.
I don’t believe these actually fooled penn and teller. Unless they gave it to her because they didn’t know it 100%. I knew basically the trick as soon as she said I’ll get back to this one later. Although I didn’t know the compound I thought it was some two part mixture that solidified. And on the second trick when the cylinder popped when she put her hand through it was so obvious. Penn and teller gave it to her.
11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3
The rules are that they are fooled if they don't know/guess 100% of the trick. They might have guessed another method of turning the glass for example ("she had no way of turning it with her hands, and must have used a mechanism under the table") and the judge in their ears told them that they were wrong and fooled. Also only seeing it once makes it easy to miss details that only become significant once you know how the trick ends.
Out of respect for her father, it's possible that they really have given it to her. But also bc it's TV, & ratings are important, the producers may be the ones who choose to let her win. They also know who her dad is, & her participation will bring in many viewers from Australia.
@@M.O.W. makes no sense, because P&T (two guys of tremendous integrity) have told again and again the awards are not faked, and also that the show is not really about fooling them but about showcasing cool magic and magicians. And they have more times than NOT guessed how an amazing trick was done, it has nothing to do with the magician. They've congratulated magicians on their acts that failed to win the prize. Producers cannot choose who wins because it's P&T, not the producers, the ones who do the guessing.
@@markjones5843Why is it sad? You literally have to go out of your way to see the secret. If you didn't want to know, you wouldn't click on the video. 🤡
@@dmontes133 to see if they get it right but hopefully they didn't. These tricks secrets showing how they are done is sad for future generations. I loved being fooled when I was a child but eventually all magic will be gone!
You lost respect for the show because some random YT channel explains, after the fact (and with some incomplete/dodgy explanations) something that cannot be guessed in real time while it happens?
Her Dad invents and builds all her tricks /props. He’s a genius. She performs them excellently. 🎉🎉
A wooden box made of wood.
An AI voice that use AI.
*Facial For The Face* 🤗
@@4saken404 A commenter that made a comment. #keepitgoing
A wooden response.
@@keithdow8327A solid response.
Just found your channel and i can legitimate say this channel feels like a youtube version of "Magics biggest secrets finally revealed" series and i love it
By the way i definitely notice the pouring into the glass was incorrect before you explained it. It was coming out more like a batter/paste rather than milk which pours like water
❤️
Tbh the first trick was really obvious. Even I, someone without any expertise in illusions, was able to guess the solution. I'm honestly surprised, and a bit disappointed, that Penn said both tricks fooled them.
this is not the same version as the one done on fool us, in FU she inserted the rod vertically, I think it was made specifically to discard this method
Yeah, there is no way the first trick fooled either of them. But I guess they gotta add some dramatic flair for tv?
I would get suspicious when the magician says she has to come back to that trick later. I believe many other people would be suspicious also.
Why can't you do the trick now? Why are you going to come back to the trick later?
When something is not how something normally happens (in this case delaying pouring the milk), you can guess that the trick needs it. A good trick is performed in a way that you would normally do that thing, in this case pour the milk in a glass without coming back later to pour more milk.
But how did she rotate back the glass though? 🤔
It's in the original position at the end.
A spring mechanism?
She simply pushes the screw back over...
You can see her tumb do it when she turns the box back. Right before that you can also see the screw.
all these videos to explain are poor attempts, even if the glass had a hole, wouldn't the silicon spell? does it really harden in 1 min? or 1 hr? how come it didn't harden during in the jug etc etc. , also if there is a flap in the big jug, do you have any idea how to move a flap that can hold liquid (to solve this alone require you to be n inventor )
@@3dmagictricks The part about the silicon not hardening in the jug was clearly explained in the video. As for the silicon not spilling through the holes in the glass, you could avoid that with simple gaskets
@@2rare2die100 I guess I'm trying to say everyone overthink these . Its much simpler. The problem is the show edit out parts and add parts from pre show. So you get the impossible version on tv.
Let me just say that he first vanishing milk jug is very similar in method to the glass , its more of craftmanship and less chemistry
Is it possible to reveal the cage trick shes done at fool us ?
"A wooden box made of wood"...
Please reveal her other 5 fool us tricks too.
well one thing u missed with the jug yes there is a flap but the flap is set loose by the handle if u look in slomo u see that the bottom connection is a bit thinker and looser then the top part , with the glass u are a bit right and a bit wrong , the glass looks like real glass but is in fact also a type of silicon , how do i know that a normal glass isnt that thick at the top part , and the glass doesnt reflect as much as normal glass , in fact just poor the glass in a mold with a rod in it then u have holes in there , the holes are cover with celofane , cause or else the silicon milk she puts in the glass would go thru the holes , the thing is with glass like silicon , if u put other silicon in it it reacts chemicly to it and hardens , the celofane is breached by the rod to let it pass the middle .
This was a cool trick and I think Helen's father came up with a new way to pass a rod through a glass. Penn & Teller respect new ideas and were fooled by the new way the trick worked.
The explanation just left me with more questions
So what kept the silicon from solidifying in the pitcher before she poured it into the glass?
There's hot milk in the other half of the pitcher keeping the silicon in liquid form. Once the silicon is poured into the room temperature glass it solidifies.
This was much more complicated than I thought brilliant
🙌
One piece missing. How did the cup get rotated back after the rod is removed?
That's why she doesn't let them see the props. Also, politics doesn't mean you have to win all the time
a wooden box made out of wood... who could have guessed :O
Watching this I realized I dont want to know how the sausage is made. I just want to enjoy the trick.
Ok
Asi Wind was right, after watching this trick I can no longer see magic 😭
Penn and Teller always let her win. Because of respect for her father who creates these tricks.
No way that fooled Penn and Teller.
seems like you got it right, but how did p and t not figure that out?
She places it in a wooden box, made of wood, eh?
I'm with the people who don't think Penn and Teller were fooled.
I have no problem with the video. If you take a trick or national TV, you know it will be broken down and analyzed.
They obviously just pick and choose who wins, like his daughter who apparently fooled them with an entry level trick.
It doesn't matter what you think. We saw the episode and know that Penn and Teller was fooled. In fact they were fooled all 5 times Helen did her magic.
It may be a professional courtesy, considering who her dad is. He's 91yrs old, & he's the one who creates the tricks.
For goodness sake people, Penn and Teller have to make an assessment of how they did it live, within a few minutes, with no re-watches, slow motion or zoom ins, or time to research and consult others. All of which are available to ACE and others who make such videos.
Kamala Harris?
th-cam.com/video/akJ3an_DFWA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=is41Pyxd-fFvzANS
But how does she do this one?! It’s driven me bonkers since that Fool Us episode. Is it the same kinda gimmick? With a ‘rod’ going vertical through not milk?
Also, love this video. It’s an elegant concise description a skeptic magic judge like me needs when caught obsessing over a trick. Thank you for sharing ❤
I love all the people in the comments section that like to talk about how obvious and easy the trick was to figure out *on a video revealing it.*
If it was that easy for you to figure out, _why are you here?_ You searched for a video revealing the secret to an obvious trick, and chose to view it, because it was so easy? What, was it that you wanted to check and see if you were right? If it's that easy, you should've been certain. Worse yet, did you do it specifically to post a comment about how obvious the trick was because you want people you don't know to think you're clever? Yeesh, is your self esteem that low?
I mean... I'm honestly trying here, but I genuinely can't think of a single, logical reason that wouldn't mean you were either an insufferable tool or an outright liar...or possibly both.🤔😅
Either you didn't know how the trick was done until you watched this video, which would mean you're lying because you want to feel less dumb, and that's just sad. But, on the other hand, if you knew how the trick was done and you came here and to brag about it to strangers on the internet, that's even _more_ sad, and someone of your intellect should be secure and confident...and also ashamed of themselves for stooping so low to get a self esteem boost they shouldn't need. 🤦♂️
Either way...maybe review your choices in life, and consider getting a hobby. 👍😂
But how is the road dry then?
I guess it hasn't rained...
It went through dry silicon, not milk.
The silicone was pushed inside the rod, and the metal tip where the hole was meant to be sealed the tip
Because too many people were driving on it.
not bad , but you are overthinking it. its much simpler. Its actually so simple you will be disappointed
??
@@Henry-yh5oo she uses a condom
It is really sad that people try to spoil others work just for clicks, it is even worse when they almost always get it so very wrong (just like this time). Instead of trying to spoil others work, if you are really so very clever, why not create something from scratch.
If it is explained wrong, then they have not spoiled anything.
😂😂😂😂
Ya i think peen and teller let her win
All of her tricks are simply gimmicks
They try very hard to not reveal the tricks, going to pretty crazy lengths some times to do it. I think this might be a case where if they had said anything about how it was done, or even what they wanted to check, then the trick would have been a very easy give away. So since they wouldn't do that out of professional courtesy, they had to say fooled us. Anything else would have ruined her trick on a nationwide scale.
They for instance couldn't say, id like to look at the pitcher, or, ask, can you do the trick if the glass is turned by me randomly before you put the box sides on. Doing so would have completely given away the trick
That's not entirely true. They wouldn't simply choose to let her win "out of professional courtesy." She's a magician, going on a show attempting to fool magicians. Professional courtesy is a fine idea, but if you tell a magician "I'm going to do a magic trick, see if you can figure it out," you're issuing a challenge. Likewise, if you make that statement to a magician, then you _want_ them to tell you if they know how you did it. It's vital for a magician to know how effective their routines are - it's their livelihood.
Additionally, your reasoning is flawed. I have seen Penn ask several performers if he could examine a prop to indicate that he knows how a trick was done.
There's an important distinction that you're missing. There's no secret that she's using gimmicks and gaffs. That's obvious to literally everyone. Otherwise the trick would break the actual laws of physics. It's not about knowing that she's using a gimmick, they would have to know which items were gimmicked in exactly what way to say that they knew how the trick was done. That's a distinction I have also heard Penn make. So yes, the glass or the wand (or both) _had_ to be gimmicked. The same is true of the two pitchers, when she poured the milk from one to the other and back - one, the other, or both had to be a gimmick. In order to say that she didn't fool them, though, they would have to know which props, specifically, were gimmicked, and they would have to know how.
The pitchers absolutely did not fool them, and I'm sure that they had some idea of how the glass trick works. But they won't deny her the victory unless they know exactly how every step was done.
...you don't have to agree with me, I'm just sharing information. You can do what you want with it. Please, though, don't think that I'm trying to insult, belittle or offend you. I'm genuinely just offering another point of view.
The fact that I think you happen to be wrong in this set of circumstances doesn't mean that I'm insulting you. ✌️
@@SevenTheJester I believe the professional courtesy is for her father. He's in his 90s, is a famous magician, & is the one who creates the tricks. Penn & Teller know him professionally but also personally, enough to visit him at his home at least.
So P&T might not scrutinize her act as much as they may scrutinize other's, in order to honor her dad. Like you said, they've often gone on stage to study magician's props, but they've never chosen to study hers.
@@M.O.W. Sorry they did, check it out, the cage that lock her.
I think your reveal is much more complicated that the real thing and not all practical. Nice try
I don’t believe these actually fooled penn and teller. Unless they gave it to her because they didn’t know it 100%. I knew basically the trick as soon as she said I’ll get back to this one later. Although I didn’t know the compound I thought it was some two part mixture that solidified. And on the second trick when the cylinder popped when she put her hand through it was so obvious. Penn and teller gave it to her.
The rules are that they are fooled if they don't know/guess 100% of the trick. They might have guessed another method of turning the glass for example ("she had no way of turning it with her hands, and must have used a mechanism under the table") and the judge in their ears told them that they were wrong and fooled.
Also only seeing it once makes it easy to miss details that only become significant once you know how the trick ends.
They pick and choose who wins. It has nothing to do with being fooled or not. It's just TV
Out of respect for her father, it's possible that they really have given it to her. But also bc it's TV, & ratings are important, the producers may be the ones who choose to let her win. They also know who her dad is, & her participation will bring in many viewers from Australia.
@@LunchMeatTrump this is false, they have to be genuinely fooled. And it's in front of a live audience. Why do people keep spewing this crap?
@@M.O.W. makes no sense, because P&T (two guys of tremendous integrity) have told again and again the awards are not faked, and also that the show is not really about fooling them but about showcasing cool magic and magicians. And they have more times than NOT guessed how an amazing trick was done, it has nothing to do with the magician. They've congratulated magicians on their acts that failed to win the prize. Producers cannot choose who wins because it's P&T, not the producers, the ones who do the guessing.
Who knows if your right. Its an incredible trick either way and just a little sad if your right you gave away the secret for clicks
A trick is burned as soon as it is performed in front of a national audience like this.
@@jeepdude7359 it's still sad
@@markjones5843Why is it sad? You literally have to go out of your way to see the secret. If you didn't want to know, you wouldn't click on the video. 🤡
Why are you watching?
@@dmontes133 to see if they get it right but hopefully they didn't. These tricks secrets showing how they are done is sad for future generations. I loved being fooled when I was a child but eventually all magic will be gone!
There is no reason why you should expose this. Except that you have no talent to go on the show.
Why are you watching?
I just lost a lot of respect for the show.
You lost respect for the show because some random YT channel explains, after the fact (and with some incomplete/dodgy explanations) something that cannot be guessed in real time while it happens?