Historical Significance: Maurice Brumer was known for his vigourous and sustained advocacy of using plus lenses for the control of myopia, so vigourous that he disrupted the optometry section Presidential address at the 1978 ANZAAS meeting in Melbourne in a way that attracted local TV stations. He was protesting the refusal of the optometry ANZAAS committee to accept his paper. He also represented his views to the Federal Minister for Health. He was so disputatious that he was expelled from membership of the AOA and became engaged in legal dispute with it. His campagn for his views was certainly sustained: it began in 1977 and continued to at least 2008, some 30 years, during which time he practised various forms of harassment of the optometrists who has opposed his views. These included faxing long documents overnight to exhaust the ink and paper in the recipients fax machines. Brumer is now retired. See Cat No 887 and 1682 for additional documentation of this dispute. See also the book The therapeutics of ocular refraction 1942 written by his father, Victor Brumer, also an optometrist, who expresses similar views on the treatment of myopia (Cat N
Historical Significance: Maurice Brumer was known for his vigourous and sustained advocacy of using plus lenses for the control of myopia, so vigourous that he disrupted the optometry section Presidential address at the 1978 ANZAAS meeting in Melbourne in a way that attracted local TV stations. He was protesting the refusal of the optometry ANZAAS committee to accept his paper. He also represented his views to the Federal Minister for Health. He was so disputatious that he was expelled from membership of the AOA and became engaged in legal dispute with it. His campagn for his views was certainly sustained: it began in 1977 and continued to at least 2008, some 30 years, during which time he practised various forms of harassment of the optometrists who has opposed his views. These included faxing long documents overnight to exhaust the ink and paper in the recipients fax machines. Brumer is now retired. See Cat No 887 and 1682 for additional
paper written by Melbourne optometrist, Maurice Brumer on the subject of control of myopia by prescription of bifocal lenses and the history of his dispute with the AOA and optometric academia. Also in the file are: (1) copy of an editorial in Insight September 2008 on Maurice Brumer about his dispute with the AOA and academia, (2) Extracts from Hansard in the Australian Parliament recording questions asked on behalf of Mr Brumer by Douglas Everingham MP on June 4 1979, by Dick Klugman MP on March 6 1979 and remarks made by Bob Chynoweth MP, member for Dunkley, in an adjournment debate on June 22 1995, (3) a photocopy of a letter dated 5 April 1993 written by Maurice Brumer to the Victorian Division of the AOA stating he will not resign, and (4) a photocopy of an article in Insight (copy undated) headed 'I am proud to be expelled'
Using the monitor that checks your visual field that flashes dots on the screen, can you see if my eyes move? Asking as I have a brain injury and I may move my eyes forgetting I’m not meant to be moving them
For his efforts, Maurice Brumer was expelled from the Victorian division of the Australian Optometrical Association, a first in history. He dared challenge the cabal that rules optometry in Victoria when he spoke out at a 1992 annual meeting of the Victoria AOA and the national AOA. An extensive body of theoretical and clinical evidence already exists to show the harmful effects of current optometrical practices. The analogy could be made to tobacco companies, where no amount of research and evidence will convince them of the health related problems of smoking and to the scandal it would be if they could successfully suppress such evidence. In the belief that the burden of proof lies with the profession to show that its current standards of practices are in the best interests of its patients, Maurice presented a paper before 400 optometrists. The only response since was for the Australian Optometrical Association to make him the first member ever expelled from the association. The Australian Optometrical Association rigidly enforces the code that the first obligation of the optometrist is to his professional colleagues. Maurice insists it is to his patients. 38 People Reached 1 Engagement Boost Post 11
Spec savers is about selling glasses . You do the refraction test , they then tell you yes you need glasses . You go out to the front of the shop and pick your frames , then they tell you two weeks they will be ready . However they do have a trick and the trick is they don’t tell you after the refraction test what your prescription is because they don’t want you to go anywhere cheaper to get those strength glasses for a fraction of the price . My advice is ASK what is my prescription after the refraction test ? Then go get them else where . How do I know ? Because I did this on advice from someone else and I saved hundreds of dollars . Go the the warehouse get glasses for 20 bucks job done . Even spec savers have Chinese products . It’s a con job .
(5.34 p.m.) -In the adjournment debate this evening, honourable members may be surprised that I will speak not on Jeffrey Kennett but on a constituent of mine, Mr Maurice Brumer. Maurice is a qualified second generation optometrist who has had continuous sole practice in Frankston for over 25 years. He is actively campaigning on behalf of children who, through no fault of their own, are condemned to a life of reading difficulties and early departure from the education system.
paper written by Melbourne optometrist, Maurice Brumer on the subject of control of myopia by prescription of bifocal lenses and the history of his dispute with the AOA and optometric academia. Also in the file are: (1) copy of an editorial in Insight September 2008 on Maurice Brumer about his dispute with the AOA and academia, (2) Extracts from Hansard in the Australian Parliament recording questions asked on behalf of Mr Brumer by Douglas Everingham MP on June 4 1979, by Dick Klugman MP on March 6 1979 and remarks made by Bob Chynoweth MP, member for Dunkley, in an adjournment debate on June 22 1995, (3) a photocopy of a letter dated 5 April 1993 written by Maurice Brumer to the Victorian Division of the AOA stating he will not resign, and (4) a photocopy of an article in Insight (copy undated) headed 'I am proud to be expelled'
He was protesting the refusal of the optometry ANZAAS committee to accept his paper. He also represented his views to the Federal Minister for Health. He was so disputatious that he was expelled from membership of the AOA and became engaged in legal dispute with it. His campagn for his views was certainly sustained: it began in 1977 and continued to at least 2008, some 30 years, during which time he practised various forms of harassment of the optometrists who has opposed his views. These included faxing long documents overnight to exhaust the ink and paper in the recipients fax machines. Brumer is now retired. See Cat No 887 and 1682 for additional documentation of this dispute. See also the book The therapeutics of ocular refraction 1942 written by his father, Victor Brumer, also an optometrist, who exp
There glass is from china & philpines well they are from emerald. And the amount of money they charge. U better off with lazor. Never need glasses again. And glasses these days are just as much as eye lazor
This man forgot his patient who had to listen to him with her jaw resting on the machine the whole time ha ha... 😂
When I was a kid I used to think id get told off if I couldn't read the letters or if I got them wrong
I'm going to Specsavers and I'm not nervous at all even before I watch this video 👓👍👍
mypization.net MAKE MYOPIA WORSE
Historical Significance: Maurice Brumer was known for his vigourous and sustained advocacy of using plus lenses for the control of myopia, so vigourous that he disrupted the optometry section Presidential address at the 1978 ANZAAS meeting in Melbourne in a way that attracted local TV stations. He was protesting the refusal of the optometry ANZAAS committee to accept his paper. He also represented his views to the Federal Minister for Health. He was so disputatious that he was expelled from membership of the AOA and became engaged in legal dispute with it. His campagn for his views was certainly sustained: it began in 1977 and continued to at least 2008, some 30 years, during which time he practised various forms of harassment of the optometrists who has opposed his views. These included faxing long documents overnight to exhaust the ink and paper in the recipients fax machines. Brumer is now retired. See Cat No 887 and 1682 for additional documentation of this dispute. See also the book The therapeutics of ocular refraction 1942 written by his father, Victor Brumer, also an optometrist, who expresses similar views on the treatment of myopia (Cat N
Historical Significance: Maurice Brumer was known for his vigourous and sustained advocacy of using plus lenses for the control of myopia, so vigourous that he disrupted the optometry section Presidential address at the 1978 ANZAAS meeting in Melbourne in a way that attracted local TV stations. He was protesting the refusal of the optometry ANZAAS committee to accept his paper. He also represented his views to the Federal Minister for Health. He was so disputatious that he was expelled from membership of the AOA and became engaged in legal dispute with it. His campagn for his views was certainly sustained: it began in 1977 and continued to at least 2008, some 30 years, during which time he practised various forms of harassment of the optometrists who has opposed his views. These included faxing long documents overnight to exhaust the ink and paper in the recipients fax machines. Brumer is now retired. See Cat No 887 and 1682 for additional
paper written by Melbourne optometrist, Maurice Brumer on the subject of control of myopia by prescription of bifocal lenses and the history of his dispute with the AOA and optometric academia. Also in the file are: (1) copy of an editorial in Insight September 2008 on Maurice Brumer about his dispute with the AOA and academia, (2) Extracts from Hansard in the Australian Parliament recording questions asked on behalf of Mr Brumer by Douglas Everingham MP on June 4 1979, by Dick Klugman MP on March 6 1979 and remarks made by Bob Chynoweth MP, member for Dunkley, in an adjournment debate on June 22 1995, (3) a photocopy of a letter dated 5 April 1993 written by Maurice Brumer to the Victorian Division of the AOA stating he will not resign, and (4) a photocopy of an article in Insight (copy undated) headed 'I am proud to be expelled'
I’m so nervous for no reason
This is true. i went to an opticians and there was a sign on the door that said PLEASE MIND THE STEP
Using the monitor that checks your visual field that flashes dots on the screen, can you see if my eyes move? Asking as I have a brain injury and I may move my eyes forgetting I’m not meant to be moving them
When I was younger I used the love the hotair balloon machine picture thingy
For his efforts, Maurice Brumer was expelled from the Victorian division of the Australian Optometrical Association, a first in history. He dared challenge the cabal that rules optometry in Victoria when he spoke out at a 1992 annual meeting of the Victoria AOA and the national AOA. An extensive body of theoretical and clinical evidence already exists to show the harmful effects of current optometrical practices. The analogy could be made to tobacco companies, where no amount of research and evidence will convince them of the health related problems of smoking and to the scandal it would be if they could successfully suppress such evidence. In the belief that the burden of proof lies with the profession to show that its current standards of practices are in the best interests of its patients, Maurice presented a paper before 400 optometrists. The only response since was for the Australian Optometrical Association to make him the first member ever expelled from the association. The Australian Optometrical Association rigidly enforces the code that the first obligation of the optometrist is to his professional colleagues. Maurice insists it is to his patients.
38
People Reached
1
Engagement
Boost Post
11
Spec savers is about selling glasses . You do the refraction test , they then tell you yes you need glasses . You go out to the front of the shop and pick your frames , then they tell you two weeks they will be ready . However they do have a trick and the trick is they don’t tell you after the refraction test what your prescription is because they don’t want you to go anywhere cheaper to get those strength glasses for a fraction of the price . My advice is ASK what is my prescription after the refraction test ? Then go get them else where . How do I know ? Because I did this on advice from someone else and I saved hundreds of dollars . Go the the warehouse get glasses for 20 bucks job done . Even spec savers have Chinese products . It’s a con job .
is the spray to clean the glasses poisonous to you
(5.34 p.m.) -In the adjournment debate this evening, honourable members may be surprised that I will speak not on Jeffrey Kennett but on a constituent of mine, Mr Maurice Brumer. Maurice is a qualified second generation optometrist who has had continuous sole practice in Frankston for over 25 years. He is actively campaigning on behalf of children who, through no fault of their own, are condemned to a life of reading difficulties and early departure from the education system.
paper written by Melbourne optometrist, Maurice Brumer on the subject of control of myopia by prescription of bifocal lenses and the history of his dispute with the AOA and optometric academia. Also in the file are: (1) copy of an editorial in Insight September 2008 on Maurice Brumer about his dispute with the AOA and academia, (2) Extracts from Hansard in the Australian Parliament recording questions asked on behalf of Mr Brumer by Douglas Everingham MP on June 4 1979, by Dick Klugman MP on March 6 1979 and remarks made by Bob Chynoweth MP, member for Dunkley, in an adjournment debate on June 22 1995, (3) a photocopy of a letter dated 5 April 1993 written by Maurice Brumer to the Victorian Division of the AOA stating he will not resign, and (4) a photocopy of an article in Insight (copy undated) headed 'I am proud to be expelled'
He was protesting the refusal of the optometry ANZAAS committee to accept his paper. He also represented his views to the Federal Minister for Health. He was so disputatious that he was expelled from membership of the AOA and became engaged in legal dispute with it. His campagn for his views was certainly sustained: it began in 1977 and continued to at least 2008, some 30 years, during which time he practised various forms of harassment of the optometrists who has opposed his views. These included faxing long documents overnight to exhaust the ink and paper in the recipients fax machines. Brumer is now retired. See Cat No 887 and 1682 for additional documentation of this dispute. See also the book The therapeutics of ocular refraction 1942 written by his father, Victor Brumer, also an optometrist, who exp
I used to always pretend I was short sighted to get glasses I need them now rn lol 😂 and I don’t want them now I just wear contacts
Man got the rik mayall hair cut 😂
uncomfortable
There glass is from china & philpines well they are from emerald. And the amount of money they charge. U better off with lazor. Never need glasses again. And glasses these days are just as much as eye lazor
I've have and eye test
Think you might be due another one.
@@Mandaxx25 getting it in 3 months
Got mine tomorrow 🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸