Could you give some examples of emotional biases? If you mean that it is fallacious to argue that Islam is false because one doesn't like it, you're right. If you mean that it is fallacious to say that Islam is false because it gets moral facts wrong, then, at least for moral realists (like myself), you're wrong. It is valid to argue that the claims that God is perfectly good and that he approves of something like slavery are self-contradictory.
Most islamic apologist don't know the difference between a commentary , an observation , refuting, debunking , proving wrong, or proving right, and fact checking . Most lack Critical thinking ability, and its unfortunate you have to reply!
You opined, _"Youre one the few youtubers speaking facts without involving emotional biases."_ Did you watch the start of his video when he described him growing up? After listening to his tale of woe as achild, wouldn't you conclude that Adam almasry filled with *emotional biases?* Which is the opposite of your _'biased characterization of him!"_ _peace to the world_
A logical walk through his bizarre narration disproves everything he says. Anyone who agrees with him must be mesmerized by his strident monotone as well as being unacquainted with historical science and logic.
@@dikefalos_aetosyes and we will never stop it, because unlike you, we ACTUALLY respect ALL the prophets highly. And don’t depicy them in disrespectful in games/shows, or youtube videos
The response of Mohammed to a clear cut error showed that he knew he had goofed and rendered all his claims invalid. How many other cases could he mention where someone could be called the sister of someone who lived one thousand years before as a honour. He was simply trying to save his face.
That sister argument is already have been answered many times. Sister of Aaron is form of metaphore that is pretty common for middle-eastern languages, just like Children of Israel when you refer to jews (not literal children of Israel/Jacob), or Sons of Adam (not literally again, just descendants).
@@ogureckartophanov3283 this a false statement. Two different Mary's as sister of Aron? Then what of daughter of Imron, is that a honour too? Why is the mother of Jesus called the daughter of Aron who has a daughter called Mary? I know Mohammed was cornered and could not find an escape other than lie.
Holy shit my ears. The audio on your videos so far has been a little quiet, though it's gotten better, but this guy is just straight up yelling. I have never seen such a perfect example of "speaking in all caps".
also according to the bible, jesus christ (and thus mary) were direct descendants of king david, of the tribe of judah, and not descendants of Moses or his direct family, whom were of the tribe of levi, thus saying that mary was a “descendant” of aaron or imran would also be inaccurate, i might be wrong tho
Great video. I love to hear your perspective as an arabic speaker talking about Islam, there is so much value in that. I dont speak arabic but I am an exmuslim and I am always accused of having left islam just because I dont speak arabic. Being validated by arabic speakers is therefore very comforting :)
Even the translations themselves debunk Islam. If even the Arabic scholars can't translate the quaran properly, and we have to be a native Arabic speaker in order to understand the quaran, then Allah failed to make it clear, like it says it's designed to do. So that debunks the quaran based on that fact.
The translations seem to cover over mistakes in the Quran, so if you knew Arabic you'd be more likely to leave. Odd there, Mohammed's worst comments on the Torah is that they were covering over things (not corrupting it, but being selective), yet their translations do the same thing. One can see Arab christians and atheists show these errors - eg 33.56 Allah and the angels pray for Mohammed, is frequently mistranslated, as Allah should not be praying since He's God alone, it would work for a Trinity God or a pantheon idea.
It is impressive how he is an Arabic speaker who constantly misreads Arabic, and expects us to believe he is a man of knowledge! Never forget 'Al-Imam al Saddiy, and Masnad Imam Ahmad! XD"
Islam like other religions is a faith. The word faith is the 2nd most frequent word in the Qur'an. What is faith? Faith is to accept things as true without verifiable evidence. If you have verifiable evidence that something is a fact you don't need faith. The Qur'an, like other religious scriptures, does not prove it is from God. Rather, the Qur'an makes a claim that it is from God and then asks you to disprove its claim. This is called shifting the burden of proof upon the denier. In the real world when you make a claim you are supposed to prove your claim not demand that others disprove your claim.
@@dragonade85 what I am saying is that the Quran itself is the proof. The style of writing, the content, its effect on millions of people's hearts, the fact that it addresses all issues across different aspects of human life, the person whom it was given to, his character and so many other reasons, make it a miraculous book which can only be from the one who made us. You are speaking from a point of view of someone who hasnt read the book and lived it. Because its one thing to read the english translation of a deep language such as arabic and then claim to know the meaning, and actually living the book. I invite you to learn how to read the quran, without learning arabic, then see for yourself. Ps. English is not my mothet tongue so forgive any errors here lol
Poor guy's clearly outmatched. I hope he'll watch this video so he can learn not to pick up fights he cannot win, and learn how to think for himself instead of blindly triggering the "defend the Quran" mode in his brain.
"For us, muslims, it dosen't matter what historians are claming... what allah says in the Qur'an is the absolute truth"... That says it all : they don't care about reality . Allah is right, always, since they want to believe that. Ants can talk and knew Suleiman : entomologists are wrong. Hearts think and believe : transplants are wrong. Earth is flat, and the sun goes through a muddy hole to prostrate in front of Allah ; satelites are wrong. Truth is wrong if Qur'an says so.
Ok, I understand talking ants point, because it's a miracle, an impossible thing to be happen, fully-rational human would never believe in that. But flat earth and sun setting in muddy water are wrong claims.
Havn't you heard that every nignt , the sun goes and prostrates in front of the throne of Allah to ask for the permission to raise again ? One day, A llah will tell him to go the other way.
@@ogureckartophanov3283 sahih bukhari 4802 : Once I was with the Prophet (ﷺ) in the mosque at the time of sunset. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "O Abu Dharr! Do you know where the sun sets?" I replied, "Allah and His Apostle know best." He said, "It goes and prostrates underneath (Allah's) Throne; and that is Allah's Statement:-- 'And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term (decreed). And that is the decree of All-Mighty, the All-Knowing....'
Never read the quran I don't want to waste my time on a nonsense book however this story about Pharoah building a tower sounds like a confusion including the story of the tower of Babel.
1 He straight up went into the Bible 😂. 2 Even though he believes Bible is corrupted 😂 3 that's a circular argument, since he is appealing to something which he claims to be false or corrupted. Although no where in Qur'an or Hadith it says that.
I am incredibly pleased i have stumbled upon your channel. Been having major doubts about islam since i started reading the Hadiths, i didn't really noticed these errors in the Qur'an so i'm glad you have opened my eyes, unlike the other dude in the video your watching they he's seem dead, I look forward to watching some more videos from yourself. Subscribed. P.S Video should be renamed; Calm adult puts obnoxious child in place xD. Keep up the good work.
That Syfe is refuting everyone who brings out the truth of the errors and contradictions in the quran. You are the first I came across now to refute this guy. Kudos to you.
It stings them, you know, and that's very good and encouraging. They have reason and conscience like the rest of humanity, but they have also been bribed and corrupted by Islam. It'll be a long fight. Thanks for the video Adam, please stay strong man.
The main issue with sister of Aaron is that sister cannot mean descendant. One could argue that Mary is a "daughter" of Amram since her cousin Elizabeth is a "daughter" of Aaron, the son of Amram. But no title uses sibling relationships to refer to descendants of an important person. Let's say Aaron had a direct daughter who was a pious prophetess. Would anyone call her sister of Aaron, her direct father? Say if Aaron had a great granddaughter who became a prophetess, would anyone call her sister of Aaron, her great grandfather? So why would it make any more sense that Mary, who probably isn't even an actual descendant of Aaron, could be the sister of her great great (etc) grandfather?
100% fact on point 1. This poor Muslim apologist doesn't know history or logic or possibly neither. Yeah, same conclusion for the 2nd point and I'm just finishing my comment with how sad it is this guy is so confidently embarrassingly wrong.
Great going, Adam. By the way, could you please make a video on the simple math fail in Islamic inheritance law (Surah 4.11-4.12)? I have recently made a video on this topic but you can reach a much wider audience.
The daughter of someone vs "of the daughters of" gives it a completely different meaning. He proved himself wrong in the english because he also isnt a nstuve english speaker.
This atheist kept repeating you are assuming you are making assumption while he assume the guy does not know arabic. He is from an Arab country called Morocco so he speaks Arabic
So, Adam Elmasri concluded, based on what he said at around the 6:20 mark, the Quran contained _"historical errors"_ because... the translation of the Quran by the Sunni/Shiite/Scholars DOES NOT JIVE with the _historical "facts" of Adam Elmasri's choice!_ More precisely... where does that verse mention anything about _"the Samaritans AND the City Of Samaria?"_ You are simply putting words into the verse to justify the _"historical facts"_ invented by people who don't even know actually existed or not. But, due to your *emotional biases* you assumed one is right and the other is factually erroneous! This is akin to *trying to disprove a lie with another lie!* Poor lost misguided soul. _peace to the world_ *the Quran is its own dictionary...* there is no need for Adam Elmasri to insert his biased _"historical facts!"_
In ant case, the quaran is supposed to be clear and for all times. If its divinely inspired, and supposed yo be clear, why isnt it clear? The fact its unclear debunks it.
Every holy book must come with an instruction manual. To explain the baseline assembly and to provide a guide to retrofit it to the 21st and every other century.
I had to turn the volume off and put captions on. Your voice is soothing, this other guys voice is like nails on a chalk board feels like he's on stimulants idk
The event at Mount Sinai is before 1400 BC. The Samaritan civilization first existed during the time of King Omri (ruled 880s-870s BCE), so during the time of King Hosea (reign to 732-721 BCE), the Samaritans already existed. But during the time of Moses no Samaritans exist. According to Encyclopedia Judaica, 1972, Volume 14, col. 727, the Samaritans are the direct descendants of the Joseph tribes, Ephraim and Manasseh, and until the 17th century CE they possessed a high priesthood descending directly from Aaron through Eleazar and Phinehas. Again this source is 1972 so it is not reliable. Let's say they descendants of Ephraim or Manasseh, the point is again Samaritans only began existing from the time of King Omri (860 BCE). You cannot use the Qur'an passages because Qur'an was written around 640 CE. The earliest Archeological findings of Samarian existence of a sacred precinct on the site in the Persian period, by the 5th century BCE. So again the earliest existence of Samaritans is in the Old Testament during the time of King Omri (860 BCE), and again no Samaritans existed during the time of Moses. Mary's parents was not mentioned in the New Testament, but was mentioned as Joachim and Anna from the 2nd Century Apocryphal Gospel of James which is not included in the canon. So if Qur'an claims the brother of Mary is Aaron without any other reference is simply a false claim. Numbers 26:59. 'the name of Amram's wife was Jochebed, a descendant of Levi, who was born to the Levites in Egypt. To Amram she bore Aaron, Moses and their sister Miriam. So their should be no confusion here, since the time gap between Miriam and Mary mother of Jesus is 1,400 years. Even the parents of Miriam who is Amram and Jochebed is different from Mary's parents Joachim and Anna and Mary has no brother said in the New Testament. Of course if the intentions of the Qur'an writer is to seek the truth their should be no false claim from their book since the Bible records is confirmed by other books much earlier than the Qur'an. But the Qur'an wrote a false claim stating Mary as Aaron's sister and daughter of Imran. The base of the pyramid is made of granite blocks and the remaining part is made of limestone blocks, the average bearing capacity for these materials is 343.65 KN that is why the Egyptians used these materials to build the pyramids to great heights. Now fired or baked bricks has a much lower bearing capacity of up to 35 KN and lower, so it would be a waste of time and resources to use this to build high structures. In Genesis 11 it was written that the people used baked bricks to build their city with a tower, but the tower was not completed for God disrupted them and another reason is that bricks could not simply support the shear weight of the structure as it goes higher, that is why the city was never finished. If you look at the Hebrew text it is not mentioned as heavens but baš·šā·ma·yim (heaven), meaning the atmosphere. Surah 28 ayah 38 could have used these verses without knowing that you cannot build a tower made of fired bricks as high as the pyramid or higher because it will not have enough internal strength to support the weight. The evidences supporting the truth of the Book of Esther is: 1. Numerous scholars have proposed theories as to who Ahasuerus represents. Most scholars today identify him with Xerxes I, as did 19th-century Bible commentaries.[9] Three factors, among others, contribute to this identification: It is believed the Hebrew 'Ahasuerus' descended from the Persian names for Xerxes I. Historian Herodotus describes Xerxes I as being susceptible to women and in the habit of making extravagant offers to them, just as he did to Esther ("up to half my kingdom"). Herodotus mentions that the Persian empire stretched from India to Ethiopia and also refers to the magnificent royal palace in Shushan (Susa), corroboration of what is stated in the Book of Esther. In addition Herodotus mentions an assembly of Persian nobles called by Xerxes to advise him on the proposed war against Greece. Although Herodotus does not give the location of this assembly, the date - "after Egypt was subdued" - corresponds to Xerxes' third year when Esther records an assembly of Persian nobility at a feast. (Histories VII.8) Herodotus also mentions that following his defeat at Salamis Xerxes I became involved in harem intrigues involving his wife Amestris and his daughter-in-law, with whom he became enamoured. (Histories IX.108) Herodotus relates this occurred in the tenth month of his seventh year as king - the same time Ahasuerus was choosing beautiful women for his harem (Esther 2:16). Annals from the reign of Xerxes I mention an otherwise unattested official by the name of "Marduka", which some have proposed refers to Mordecai, as both are mentioned serving in the king's court. 2. The Discovery Susa. Persia’s Royal Ancient Capital. Susa served as a vital site for major empires, such as the Elamite, Persian, and Parthian. Its prominence in history is well-documented, especially in ancient texts like the Bible, where it is noted as the setting of the Book of Esther. It also functioned as one of the administrative capitals under Darius the Great during the Achaemenid Empire, reinforcing its role as a cultural and political powerhouse. 3. Discovery of Artaxerxes II Inscription. Northeast of Susa, Loftus recognized the Apadāna of the Achaemenid palace. South of the Royal City, another very damaged building revealed a column base with a trilingual inscription (A2Sb) of Artaxerxes II (r. 404-359 BCE; Kent, Old Persian, p. 154; Lecoq, 1997, p. 273) which is not attested elsewhere. It was later retrieved by the Dieulafoys and is now in the Louvre Museum. Artaxerxes II was the oldest son of Darius II and Parysatis, thus a grandson of Artaxerxes I. His reign (405-04 to 359-58 B.C.) was the longest among the Achaemenids. When Darius II died in 405-04 B.C., Artaxerxes was appointed king in accordance with his father’s wish. 4. The Discovery of The Royal Palace of Susa. The Royal palace of Susa was built by Esther’s royal father-in-law Darius I, known to history as Darius the Great. Darius constructed Susa as a winter capital of the Persian empire, here he constructed a massive 12-acre terrace upon which he built his monumental palace connected to the city of Susa by a large gate known in Esther as the King’s Gate (Esther 2:19). To access the palace compound, one would have to cross a bridge over a river and walk through the King’s Gate and into a large courtyard outside of the palace. This system of the Palace complex being separated from the city proper is reflected in the book of Esther that distinguishes between the city of Susa and the Citadel of Susa that should be identified as the Palace complex (Esther 3:15). Inside the palace, the royal banquet hall (known as the Apadana) has been identified. It was a pillared room whose elaborately decorated columns were 65 feet tall.[1] This banquet hall saw the infamous feast of Xerxes when he drunkenly requested queen Vashti’s presence (Esther 1), it also was a main place of Nehemiah’s work as cupbearer to King Artaxerxes (Nehemiah 2). The very spot of the king’s throne in this banquet hall has been identified by its stone base centred between the pillars of the room. The Palace itself was organized in a more Babylonian style incorporating three main courtyards that created a grand walkway through the palace on the way to the King’s throne room. These courtyards would have been decorated with stone reliefs and glazed bricks, and they were separated by guard houses. The book of Esther indicates that the outer courtyard was the place the Royal officials would come with their business and wait to be summoned by the king, as Haman providentially did (Esther 6:4). So their are various writings confirming the Book of Esther and these are the Antiquities of the Jews by Josephus, the Apocryphal book of Tobit, and the Targum. Archeological discoveries also mentioned above also point to the truth about the Book of Esther. What is untrue, bias and lies is what is written in the Qur'an.
Adam, please make a video about Hijri in connection with 9 : 36-37 Seems someone in 7th century didnt know about earth's revolution and the effect of 11days deficit to the calculation of seasons.
If you can find relics/statues of mathematics, then you can claim putting your hands on the "traces of Abraham, Moses, Jacob..." *The oneness of God is an abstract concept* That's why *you can't find physical statues/relics/traces* referring to the messengers/apostles of God. As simple as that.
@@AdamElmasriEnglish you did great justice to this muslim miskeen. His voice and style of presentation is so irritating it's difficult to listen to him shouting angrily. I guess the Muslim dawah prefers loud and bold faced liars. Keep up the good work exposing Islam for humanity's sake!
Mr. Adam, would you like to unveil about "alaqah" , a clot of blood blood. Can the "has been differentiated cell" like a clot of blood become another cell, for example it become a brain cell, a bone cell or a kidney cell medically without any genetic engineering ?
Nice try "I speak arabic" then you must know that Samiri and Samari are different words.The word Samari refers to the person from samaria and the word Samiri has completely different meaning.Samiri means to stay up late at night or to have conversations late at night which coincedentally describes the man exactly.Respond to this comment if you arent afraid.
I think you’re confusing Samiri with Samer سامر / السامر Samer or Alsamer could mean the one who stays up at night (chatting at night). That word doesnt end in ‘i’ I can prove it and give examples in Arabic if you can read Arabic - can you?
@@AdamElmasriEnglish Nice try ignoring the main arguement.Samiri still does not mean from Samaria rather Samari does.Samiri especially in the context of the Quran does not mean The Samaritan.
@AdamElmasriEnglish So the Quran is false eh?. Prove all of this is false then?. Quran 22:5 Embryology th-cam.com/video/HdqpxdEeDdU/w-d-xo.html Semen comes from backbone and ribs (Surah 86.5-7)* Where is the seminal vesicle that makes most of the semen?. Between the backbone and ribs and which flows through and is released through his loins. th-cam.com/video/Eya3ZKMdzIs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZsCbO1Y-ih7flIXE The separation of two seas (salt water and fresh water) in the ocean 25:53 He is the One who merges the two bodies of water. This is fresh and palatable and this is salty and bitter. He made between them a partition and an inviolable barrier. th-cam.com/video/DZqwGueBsPQ/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/4uwNcYf3mLU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/l9lu6mnpB14/w-d-xo.html *The Big Bang in the Quran? There Is No Clash* th-cam.com/video/l1vBXFhseMk/w-d-xo.html So the Quran gets history wrong eh?. *THE QURAN UNLOCKS SECRETS OF ANCIENT EGYPT* th-cam.com/video/8BtpzK9qGPo/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/CM8VWH_38rE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=b72b52uamaUSe2LJ th-cam.com/video/xAifpqAGANE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=JVcDwomMyYEN3EX6 15:26 We have created the human being from hardened CLAY of aged MUD. www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2488467/Scientists-believe-beginnings-CLAY.html www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131105132027.htm Even richard dawkins agrees with that. www.express.co.uk/news/world/752936/Humans-evolved-from-MUD-says-Richard-Dawkins-bible-was-right-evolution-bible DNA CODE th-cam.com/video/FrhRaNetisM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=lq3tOAzK5ZZ3Rzyi Was muhammad a scientist?. Did anyone during the 7th century know about this?. NO, yet the Quran described this 1400 years before scientists actually discovered the reasons for this. This is a book you want banned?. Now, who did all of this, if not GOD?. Deny that you idiot. Why does an ex xtian even care that the Quran says that the cruxiFICTION didn't happen if as an ex xtian, you don't even believe in what the bible says anymore?. Stupid.🙄
His first "refutation" also contradicts the Quran. If it's okay to say that people belong to the same group as their descendants, like this guy argues for the Samaritan, then the Quran is wrong to say that Abraham wasn't a Jew. So if this guy is right the Quran is wrong, and if he's wrong the Quran is also wrong. Gee, I wonder if the Quran might be wrong!
..... get your things right dude... how can abraham be a jew when "juda"ism didnt exist then. He was ofc a Muslim, which literally means "someone who submits his will to GOD". With GOD i mean Allah, the All-Powerfull, the All-Knowing.
@@kolavithonduraski5031 so when the Quran says there was a Samaritan during the time of Moses it's objectively wrong, since the Samaritans weren't a thing yet. Good to know that you believe the Quran is written in a flawed and ignorant way. P.S According to Judaism, people like Abraham are categorized as "Noahides" (people who know Judaism is true but they're not descendants of the people who were at Mount Sinai so Jewish law doesn't apply to them).
@kolavithonduraski5031 someone who submits his will to God is such a poor description. By that definition anyone who practices a faith is a Muslim. Jews Christians Hindus Mormons. It belittles the Muslim faith with that charactisation
@@milamber2553 i wrote GOD, with big letters.. ofc the only true God, the Allmighty (who is only worth of worship) is ment. this what the other religions submit to, is surely not the Allmighty and Allknowing God i meant. It is what is literally meant by muslim, because there is obviously no Deity worthy of Worship except GOD.
The Quran mixed the two stories together, but there was no point of debating the Tower of Babel as such (since the Quran didn’t mention it by that name)… just wanted to stick to one point.
He slams the Bible as corrupt and that you should not have used it as a source, but doesn’t 3:3 in the Quran state “He (God) sent down to you the Book with the Truth, confirming what came before it; and He sent down the Torah and the Gospel.” Then in 6:115 “The Word of your Lord has been completed, in truth and justice. There is no changing to His words.” So it cannot be altered?This would invalidate his argument against using the Bible as a source.
What a time to be alive where well researched scholars respond to loudmouths on the internet. The future generations are gonna be so confused 200 years from now as they recount this in their history class 😂😂
The islamic dilemma of daughter of Amram and sister of Aaron being the virgin Mary is incapable as similar hadiths and other narrations mention her as being the daughter of Amram. This can be found everywhere in sunni and shia narrations and some even mention something like "when Amram married Hannah" and such. The "honorary title" claim is as new as the "royal" we/us/best of creators referring to Allat in the koran as we don't expect a 7th century illiterate meccan caravan robbers to know much about royalty and such.
Ofc Islam is wrong. They took biblical stories and corrupted the details. Details that have nothing to do with Muhammad and which no jew or christian would deem worthy of corruption.
Al lah says he is the best provider for believers 65:3. Muhammad also states this (Sahih Muslim 2715). Any Muslim that has moved to non Islamic lands for better lives and opportunities prove Allah did not provide for them or their families, inadvertently proving Allah, quran and Muhammad as false!
Mary the mother of Jesus is from Judah tribe, while Moses, his sister Mary, and Aroon were from the tribe of Levi. Mary was not descendant of Aroon nor Moses.... and Elizabeth was her cousin from the tribe of Levi....
13:44 SYFE has the guts to call it a mistake when the Qur'an is clearly in error here! He fails to address both sides of the argument: 1. Maryam sister of Haaron 2. Maryam daughter of Imran How do Muslims reconcile the second claim? The fact that there are 2 criteria in identifying this Maryam in question from the Qur'an, then it's very clear that the Qur'an made a blatant error. The Qur'an gets it totally wrong because it also refers to her as the daughter of Imran. How does SYFE dare to claim that you're using the Christian and Jewish Bible as a source of credible information.
@@kolavithonduraski5031 😂 seems comprehension is really a problem for some people. It’s not my fault that you don’t understand that the Quran gets their identities wrong. Miriam the daughter of Imran and the sister of Aaron (Haroon) was a very different person from Mary (the mother of Jesus Christ). These two people (Miriam & Mary) both lived centuries apart from each other and it’s very clear the Quran has gotten their identities wrong from each other. Had the Quran stated only “Miriam sister of Aaron” or “Miriam daughter of Imran” alone by itself then SYFE’s assertion would hold some validity or weight.
@@kolavithonduraski5031Nothing has been debunked. The Mary who is the Daughter of Imran and sister of Aaron is also the sister of Moses. Your quran is fake. This is in addition to the other fake stories the quran copied like Suleiman and the talking ants 🐜, the sleepers of the Cave, etc. All of them are fake.
Syfetalk is a joke. His videos are full of ignorance of the Bible. Like you just said, he does not know what he's talking about. The scary thing is, he think that he refute everything😅
How long have Moses been with the Israelites before Moses was called to take the codes of law (that is today called TORAH). Remember, the Quran never said Allah gave him a law by the name "TORAH". Thus, it is plausible that the Israelites were already given sets of instructions to follow before the ones on tablets was given to him
He actually claims to read both Arabic and Hebrew. I had the audacity to tell him once, about his poor English. Then he informed me that he also speaks French. He's Moroccan btw, don't they speak Arabic? Anyway, thanks for a great video.
Moroccans speak an interesting type of Arabic that is heavily French influenced. I would probably trust his French a lot more than his English (or Arabic)
@@AdamElmasriEnglish Ok, thanks for info. His English melody is extremely difficult to follow, it almost has a Scandinavian touch to it. Do Egyptians speak Arabic?
Imran was the father of Moses, Aaron and Miriam but NOT the Virgin Mary….her father was Jaockim and he lived about 1,500 years after Imran. In the Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican traditions, Saint Joachim was the husband of Saint Anne and the father of Mary, the mother of Jesus. The story of Joachim and Anne appears first in the apocryphal Gospel of James. Joachim and Anne are not mentioned in the Bible.
Hi again mr Elmasri! Dr Luxemburg believes that the traditionalist might be right when it comes to the Sister of Aaron and the Mary Surah. He believes the title to be a comparison with the "moral" behavior of Aaron’s sister, who (like her mother) was not a "whore". There is a possibility that ”the syster of Aaron” could be a dishonorary title that Mary’s people gave her in the sense of ” syster of the Samiri” or ”the Sister of the Missguided One” like son of a B. In 4:156 the Quran is accusing the People of Israel of uttering a gross lie against Mary and this could be a direct reference to the syster of Aaron or the syster of the Samiri. ”They are condemned) for disbelieving and uttering about Mary a gross lie.”
The video you were responding to really did not justify the effort, of itself, either by its argumentation or its method and acting. It was a risible piece of da'wah, a very poor apology for apologetics. His method is that of many da’i, to act as if assertion were of itself proof, and that opposition is the same as refutation. His affected gestures of disrespect and disdain were wholly unconvincing-as if taking a drink were an insult; it’s not the action when, for example Nick Freitas does it-it’s the whole way he does it, like Pierre Poilièvre eating his apple at the reporter he humiliated. This feeble da’i goes through the motions without any evidence of understanding what the motions are supposed to achieve.
Seems like everything is hypothetical. None of you guys were there when it happened. One relies on the words of God while the other relies on the words of the Godless. If you rely on the words of God, you can be saved from errors as God is merciful but if you rely on the words of the Godless you and none other than yourself is to be blamed for the errors or misinterpretation. Think before it is too late!
What you just explained is known as Pascal's wager, which is not true btw. Also, it is not just words. I am Egyptian. I grew up in Egypt and I knowy history and monuments well. I know for a fact that the Egyptians never built highrise with clay! That's no one's words!
Quran says Bibi Mariyam was guided by Allah for not speak, when she came back to her people they asked sister of Harun, your father was not a corrupt person and your mother was not a whore but you have done a blunder. Sura Mariyam verse 27 and 28. It’s narrated in Hadith Muslim Sharif 2135 and in Tirmiji 3155 when a follower of Hazrat Muhammad (SA) named Mugira sent to Christians they asked in Quran why it is mentioned that Bibi Mariyam was the sister of Harun? Mugira didn’t know the answer and asked Hazrat Muhammad (SA) about it. He replied at that time it was a tradition of Bani Israilis to named as the prophets. Basically Hazrat Harun (A) brother of Hazrat Musa (A) and Bibi Mariyam’s brother Harun was not the same man.
Is it True that in The Holy Bible Why the Gyneology of Jesus Christ is Different in Mathew 1-1 and Luke 3-23.. In Mathew 1-1 The Father of Joseph the Carpenter is Jacob And in Luke 3-23 The Father of Joseph the Carpenter is Heli..??🙏🙏🙏
Youre one the few youtubers speaking facts without involving emotional biases
I appreciate that … thanks!
Could you give some examples of emotional biases? If you mean that it is fallacious to argue that Islam is false because one doesn't like it, you're right. If you mean that it is fallacious to say that Islam is false because it gets moral facts wrong, then, at least for moral realists (like myself), you're wrong. It is valid to argue that the claims that God is perfectly good and that he approves of something like slavery are self-contradictory.
Most islamic apologist don't know the difference between a commentary , an observation , refuting, debunking , proving wrong, or proving right, and fact checking .
Most lack Critical thinking ability, and its unfortunate you have to reply!
You opined, _"Youre one the few youtubers speaking facts without involving emotional biases."_
Did you watch the start of his video when he described him growing up?
After listening to his tale of woe as achild, wouldn't you conclude that Adam almasry filled with *emotional biases?*
Which is the opposite of your _'biased characterization of him!"_
_peace to the world_
Proving Islam is fallacies doesn't necessarily imply that your beliefs are supérieur to Islam.
We can agree on this much.
Shouting makes it true - Islamist
You mean speaking quietly like Adam who makes numerous blunders about Islam.
A logical walk through his bizarre narration disproves everything he says. Anyone who agrees with him must be mesmerized by his strident monotone as well as being unacquainted with historical science and logic.
@@keksi6844 the Samaritan didn't exist until way after the Babylon captivity
@@keksi6844 "Allah closed my ears to this video alhamdulillah"
🤣🤣🤣
The guy's voice is annoying 😒 and he seems so confident in his delusions of isssslllllaaaammm.
I feell like slapping that guy when he speaks he's too cringe😂 and lies yoo
Add to that his broken accent and how many times he must repeat "peace be among him" "al7amdulillah" 😂
@@dikefalos_aetosyes and we will never stop it, because unlike you, we ACTUALLY respect ALL the prophets highly. And don’t depicy them in disrespectful in games/shows, or youtube videos
The islamic guy sounds angry. Adam you are calm and explain things very well. I wish you much success in improving the world.
Muslim, not "Islamic".
I can’t believe how you watched his bullsh*t so peacefully, Mr. Adam. As well as his nerve-racking voice.
You know I was asking for this 😊
You did. I listened 😊
The response of Mohammed to a clear cut error showed that he knew he had goofed and rendered all his claims invalid. How many other cases could he mention where someone could be called the sister of someone who lived one thousand years before as a honour. He was simply trying to save his face.
That sister argument is already have been answered many times. Sister of Aaron is form of metaphore that is pretty common for middle-eastern languages, just like Children of Israel when you refer to jews (not literal children of Israel/Jacob), or Sons of Adam (not literally again, just descendants).
@@ogureckartophanov3283 this a false statement. Two different Mary's as sister of Aron? Then what of daughter of Imron, is that a honour too? Why is the mother of Jesus called the daughter of Aron who has a daughter called Mary? I know Mohammed was cornered and could not find an escape other than lie.
@@draconian8994 yeah, two honorable titles
@@ogureckartophanov3283 They are shameful errors, no more.
@@draconian8994 no it is not
Holy shit my ears. The audio on your videos so far has been a little quiet, though it's gotten better, but this guy is just straight up yelling. I have never seen such a perfect example of "speaking in all caps".
😆
😂😂😂, I swear his video should be turned into a meme, SPEAKING IN ALL CAPS, FORGOT THE CAPS BUTTON ON, like Ali video "I am proud of that"
ياريت تتكلم عن حرق بيوت المسيحين فى المنيا زى ما حضرتك اتكلمت عن غزة
Bravo Adam
❤️❤️❤️
also according to the bible, jesus christ (and thus mary) were direct descendants of king david, of the tribe of judah, and not descendants of Moses or his direct family, whom were of the tribe of levi, thus saying that mary was a “descendant” of aaron or imran would also be inaccurate, i might be wrong tho
You are correct.
ThEn ThE bIbLe HaS aN ErRoR wItH "Children of Israel" BeCaUsE Jesus Is NoT tHe SoN oF Jacob.
how is jesus decendant of david when jesus have no father.
@@SAM-u9r6d from his mother’s lineage i think
Great video. I love to hear your perspective as an arabic speaker talking about Islam, there is so much value in that. I dont speak arabic but I am an exmuslim and I am always accused of having left islam just because I dont speak arabic. Being validated by arabic speakers is therefore very comforting :)
Even the translations themselves debunk Islam. If even the Arabic scholars can't translate the quaran properly, and we have to be a native Arabic speaker in order to understand the quaran, then Allah failed to make it clear, like it says it's designed to do. So that debunks the quaran based on that fact.
Yeah it’s crazy islam is open to converting as many as possible without full understanding of Islam or Arabic
The translations seem to cover over mistakes in the Quran, so if you knew Arabic you'd be more likely to leave. Odd there, Mohammed's worst comments on the Torah is that they were covering over things (not corrupting it, but being selective), yet their translations do the same thing. One can see Arab christians and atheists show these errors - eg 33.56 Allah and the angels pray for Mohammed, is frequently mistranslated, as Allah should not be praying since He's God alone, it would work for a Trinity God or a pantheon idea.
It is impressive how he is an Arabic speaker who constantly misreads Arabic, and expects us to believe he is a man of knowledge! Never forget 'Al-Imam al Saddiy, and Masnad Imam Ahmad! XD"
Islam like other religions is a faith. The word faith is the 2nd most frequent word in the Qur'an. What is faith? Faith is to accept things as true without verifiable evidence. If you have verifiable evidence that something is a fact you don't need faith.
The Qur'an, like other religious scriptures, does not prove it is from God. Rather, the Qur'an makes a claim that it is from God and then asks you to disprove its claim. This is called shifting the burden of proof upon the denier. In the real world when you make a claim you are supposed to prove your claim not demand that others disprove your claim.
Teaching Zakir Naik: Angels Prove Jesus Is God th-cam.com/video/Akr-QBDO9v8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=2QrsxFfekMVbct4v via @TH-cam
Exactly.
You say with certainty that the Quran doesnt give proof it is from Allah??
@@karimmoorad9649 There is no proof. You are starting from the assumption that it is and demanding proof that it isn't.
@@dragonade85 what I am saying is that the Quran itself is the proof. The style of writing, the content, its effect on millions of people's hearts, the fact that it addresses all issues across different aspects of human life, the person whom it was given to, his character and so many other reasons, make it a miraculous book which can only be from the one who made us. You are speaking from a point of view of someone who hasnt read the book and lived it. Because its one thing to read the english translation of a deep language such as arabic and then claim to know the meaning, and actually living the book. I invite you to learn how to read the quran, without learning arabic, then see for yourself.
Ps. English is not my mothet tongue so forgive any errors here lol
Poor guy's clearly outmatched. I hope he'll watch this video so he can learn not to pick up fights he cannot win, and learn how to think for himself instead of blindly triggering the "defend the Quran" mode in his brain.
"For us, muslims, it dosen't matter what historians are claming... what allah says in the Qur'an is the absolute truth"...
That says it all : they don't care about reality . Allah is right, always, since they want to believe that.
Ants can talk and knew Suleiman : entomologists are wrong.
Hearts think and believe : transplants are wrong.
Earth is flat, and the sun goes through a muddy hole to prostrate in front of Allah ; satelites are wrong.
Truth is wrong if Qur'an says so.
Well said🎉🎉🎉🎉
Ok, I understand talking ants point, because it's a miracle, an impossible thing to be happen, fully-rational human would never believe in that.
But flat earth and sun setting in muddy water are wrong claims.
Havn't you heard that every nignt , the sun goes and prostrates in front of the throne of Allah to ask for the permission to raise again ? One day, A llah will tell him to go the other way.
@@frankehlig1856 bring evidences
@@ogureckartophanov3283 sahih bukhari 4802 :
Once I was with the Prophet (ﷺ) in the mosque at the time of sunset. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "O Abu Dharr! Do you know where the sun sets?" I replied, "Allah and His Apostle know best." He said, "It goes and prostrates underneath (Allah's) Throne; and that is Allah's Statement:-- 'And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term (decreed). And that is the decree of All-Mighty, the All-Knowing....'
That guy is just a blabber-mouth who does not know what he is saying. Always letting his emotions lead him
Never read the quran I don't want to waste my time on a nonsense book however this story about Pharoah building a tower sounds like a confusion including the story of the tower of Babel.
1 He straight up went into the Bible 😂.
2 Even though he believes Bible is corrupted 😂
3 that's a circular argument, since he is appealing to something which he claims to be false or corrupted. Although no where in Qur'an or Hadith it says that.
he is just tryna prove bible is also wrong in that claim THEN and then he refuted the arguement
I am incredibly pleased i have stumbled upon your channel. Been having major doubts about islam since i started reading the Hadiths, i didn't really noticed these errors in the Qur'an so i'm glad you have opened my eyes, unlike the other dude in the video your watching they he's seem dead, I look forward to watching some more videos from yourself. Subscribed.
P.S Video should be renamed; Calm adult puts obnoxious child in place xD. Keep up the good work.
12:13 It's like referring to "Christopher Columbus, the American"
Momins don’t even have their own lies , they copy pasted whole apologetica of Christians after copy pasting Religion.
don't worry, Syfe won't respond to any of that, he loves to clickbait his low quality content and it seems like his audience loves it too
It’s like talking to a brick wall.
The Bedouins will say "it's refuted" without even watching the video.
Bedouins? Dude... most halal bots on social media are converted non-arabs 😆
Typical apologist, talking endless monologs without facts and condescending sneers.
Not even talking endless monologues. Shouting them!
I really appreciate this guys approach and ability to be respectful and critical at the same time.
Some Christian apologist can learn from him
Very logically explained by Mr. Adam and very pleasant tone. God bless you.
That Syfe is refuting everyone who brings out the truth of the errors and contradictions in the quran. You are the first I came across now to refute this guy. Kudos to you.
You read the quran, you become muslim. When you understand the quran, you become ex-muslim.
I didn't need to read much to figure out that Islam is false.
@@Nexus-jg7evbecause your brain is behind your Ar..e
@@zarabees2123 The irony of your statement - for significant periods of time the Muslims ar..s is higher than his brain. Think about it!
just looking at their ways tells me its evil. "you will know them by their fruits".
Do you think you are smart?!! Really?!!
It stings them, you know, and that's very good and encouraging. They have reason and conscience like the rest of humanity, but they have also been bribed and corrupted by Islam. It'll be a long fight. Thanks for the video Adam, please stay strong man.
Quality content. Thank you, Adam. ❤
this analysis is amazing like you provide commentary for the initial video of yours
The main issue with sister of Aaron is that sister cannot mean descendant.
One could argue that Mary is a "daughter" of Amram since her cousin Elizabeth is a "daughter" of Aaron, the son of Amram. But no title uses sibling relationships to refer to descendants of an important person. Let's say Aaron had a direct daughter who was a pious prophetess. Would anyone call her sister of Aaron, her direct father? Say if Aaron had a great granddaughter who became a prophetess, would anyone call her sister of Aaron, her great grandfather? So why would it make any more sense that Mary, who probably isn't even an actual descendant of Aaron, could be the sister of her great great (etc) grandfather?
100% fact on point 1. This poor Muslim apologist doesn't know history or logic or possibly neither. Yeah, same conclusion for the 2nd point and I'm just finishing my comment with how sad it is this guy is so confidently embarrassingly wrong.
Great going, Adam. By the way, could you please make a video on the simple math fail in Islamic inheritance law (Surah 4.11-4.12)? I have recently made a video on this topic but you can reach a much wider audience.
Good idea!
Simple math fail? Looks like misunderstanding of verses.
Because there's no such thing as a "fail" in Islam.
Bragging and chest thumping without essence are truly the hallmarks of muslim apologists
lol that kid just made another mistake referring to marry peacebe upon him instead of saying peace be upon her 😂. Without lies Islam dies
He would have to admit that a female was a prophetess!
@@ImCarolB 😆🤣
@Stayawayfromislam2
Trans friendly muslim 🤔
The daughter of someone vs "of the daughters of" gives it a completely different meaning. He proved himself wrong in the english because he also isnt a nstuve english speaker.
When you start to lose your argument, strt shouting "allahuakbaal". You'll win. - moslems
God give you and your channel God's love and many good things to come 🙏🏽
This atheist kept repeating you are assuming you are making assumption while he assume the guy does not know arabic. He is from an Arab country called Morocco so he speaks Arabic
you may need to make an illustration with drawings and clear words so they find less space to maneuver and manipulate. Great video:)
I thought Mary was from the tribe of Judah and not Levi.
If true then she is no daughter of Aaron, who was a Levite...
Adam! I would love to see you talk on the line with Matt Dillahunty or the atheist experience!
I had one or two episodes on the atheist experience. I don’t think Matt does it anymore!
@@AdamElmasriEnglish aha I haven’t seen those! Will look at it! Heb switched to the Line I see him there every week🙌🏽
Samaria founded around 880 BC. Well after Moses.
This was inadvertently quite funny. The way you keep your calm listening to these Dalek-style rants of righteousness is beyond me.
So, Adam Elmasri concluded, based on what he said at around the 6:20 mark, the Quran contained _"historical errors"_ because...
the translation of the Quran by the Sunni/Shiite/Scholars DOES NOT JIVE with the _historical "facts" of Adam Elmasri's choice!_
More precisely... where does that verse mention anything about _"the Samaritans AND the City Of Samaria?"_
You are simply putting words into the verse to justify the _"historical facts"_ invented by people who don't even know actually existed or not. But, due to your *emotional biases* you assumed one is right and the other is factually erroneous!
This is akin to *trying to disprove a lie with another lie!*
Poor lost misguided soul.
_peace to the world_
*the Quran is its own dictionary...* there is no need for Adam Elmasri to insert his biased _"historical facts!"_
SubhanAllah couldn't have said it better my brother.
It's completely understandable why they ignore the "daughter of Imran" bit, despite it being 50% of the entire argument. They have no counter.
In ant case, the quaran is supposed to be clear and for all times. If its divinely inspired, and supposed yo be clear, why isnt it clear? The fact its unclear debunks it.
Every holy book must come with an instruction manual.
To explain the baseline assembly and to provide a guide to retrofit it to the 21st and every other century.
I had to turn the volume off and put captions on. Your voice is soothing, this other guys voice is like nails on a chalk board feels like he's on stimulants idk
The event at Mount Sinai is before 1400 BC. The Samaritan civilization first existed during the time of King Omri (ruled 880s-870s BCE), so during the time of King Hosea (reign to 732-721 BCE), the Samaritans already existed. But during the time of Moses no Samaritans exist. According to Encyclopedia Judaica, 1972, Volume 14, col. 727, the Samaritans are the direct descendants of the Joseph tribes, Ephraim and Manasseh, and until the 17th century CE they possessed a high priesthood descending directly from Aaron through Eleazar and Phinehas. Again this source is 1972 so it is not reliable. Let's say they descendants of Ephraim or Manasseh, the point is again Samaritans only began existing from the time of King Omri (860 BCE). You cannot use the Qur'an passages because Qur'an was written around 640 CE. The earliest Archeological findings of Samarian existence of a sacred precinct on the site in the Persian period, by the 5th century BCE. So again the earliest existence of Samaritans is in the Old Testament during the time of King Omri (860 BCE), and again no Samaritans existed during the time of Moses.
Mary's parents was not mentioned in the New Testament, but was mentioned as Joachim and Anna from the 2nd Century Apocryphal Gospel of James which is not included in the canon. So if Qur'an claims the brother of Mary is Aaron without any other reference is simply a false claim. Numbers 26:59. 'the name of Amram's wife was Jochebed, a descendant of Levi, who was born to the Levites in Egypt. To Amram she bore Aaron, Moses and their sister Miriam.
So their should be no confusion here, since the time gap between Miriam and Mary mother of Jesus is 1,400 years. Even the parents of Miriam who is Amram and Jochebed is different from Mary's parents Joachim and Anna and Mary has no brother said in the New Testament. Of course if the intentions of the Qur'an writer is to seek the truth their should be no false claim from their book since the Bible records is confirmed by other books much earlier than the Qur'an. But the Qur'an wrote a false claim stating Mary as Aaron's sister and daughter of Imran.
The base of the pyramid is made of granite blocks and the remaining part is made of limestone blocks, the average bearing capacity for these materials is 343.65 KN that is why the Egyptians used these materials to build the pyramids to great heights. Now fired or baked bricks has a much lower bearing capacity of up to 35 KN and lower, so it would be a waste of time and resources to use this to build high structures. In Genesis 11 it was written that the people used baked bricks to build their city with a tower, but the tower was not completed for God disrupted them and another reason is that bricks could not simply support the shear weight of the structure as it goes higher, that is why the city was never finished. If you look at the Hebrew text it is not mentioned as heavens but baš·šā·ma·yim (heaven), meaning the atmosphere. Surah 28 ayah 38 could have used these verses without knowing that you cannot build a tower made of fired bricks as high as the pyramid or higher because it will not have enough internal strength to support the weight.
The evidences supporting the truth of the Book of Esther is:
1. Numerous scholars have proposed theories as to who Ahasuerus represents. Most scholars today identify him with Xerxes I, as did 19th-century Bible commentaries.[9] Three factors, among others, contribute to this identification:
It is believed the Hebrew 'Ahasuerus' descended from the Persian names for Xerxes I.
Historian Herodotus describes Xerxes I as being susceptible to women and in the habit of making extravagant offers to them, just as he did to Esther ("up to half my kingdom"). Herodotus mentions that the Persian empire stretched from India to Ethiopia and also refers to the magnificent royal palace in Shushan (Susa), corroboration of what is stated in the Book of Esther. In addition Herodotus mentions an assembly of Persian nobles called by Xerxes to advise him on the proposed war against Greece. Although Herodotus does not give the location of this assembly, the date - "after Egypt was subdued" - corresponds to Xerxes' third year when Esther records an assembly of Persian nobility at a feast. (Histories VII.8) Herodotus also mentions that following his defeat at Salamis Xerxes I became involved in harem intrigues involving his wife Amestris and his daughter-in-law, with whom he became enamoured. (Histories IX.108) Herodotus relates this occurred in the tenth month of his seventh year as king - the same time Ahasuerus was choosing beautiful women for his harem (Esther 2:16).
Annals from the reign of Xerxes I mention an otherwise unattested official by the name of "Marduka", which some have proposed refers to Mordecai, as both are mentioned serving in the king's court.
2. The Discovery Susa. Persia’s Royal Ancient Capital. Susa served as a vital site for major empires, such as the Elamite, Persian, and Parthian. Its prominence in history is well-documented, especially in ancient texts like the Bible, where it is noted as the setting of the Book of Esther. It also functioned as one of the administrative capitals under Darius the Great during the Achaemenid Empire, reinforcing its role as a cultural and political powerhouse.
3. Discovery of Artaxerxes II Inscription. Northeast of Susa, Loftus recognized the Apadāna of the Achaemenid palace. South of the Royal City, another very damaged building revealed a column base with a trilingual inscription (A2Sb) of Artaxerxes II (r. 404-359 BCE; Kent, Old Persian, p. 154; Lecoq, 1997, p. 273) which is not attested elsewhere. It was later retrieved by the Dieulafoys and is now in the Louvre Museum. Artaxerxes II was the oldest son of Darius II and Parysatis, thus a grandson of Artaxerxes I. His reign (405-04 to 359-58 B.C.) was the longest among the Achaemenids. When Darius II died in 405-04 B.C., Artaxerxes was appointed king in accordance with his father’s wish.
4. The Discovery of The Royal Palace of Susa. The Royal palace of Susa was built by Esther’s royal father-in-law Darius I, known to history as Darius the Great. Darius constructed Susa as a winter capital of the Persian empire, here he constructed a massive 12-acre terrace upon which he built his monumental palace connected to the city of Susa by a large gate known in Esther as the King’s Gate (Esther 2:19). To access the palace compound, one would have to cross a bridge over a river and walk through the King’s Gate and into a large courtyard outside of the palace. This system of the Palace complex being separated from the city proper is reflected in the book of Esther that distinguishes between the city of Susa and the Citadel of Susa that should be identified as the Palace complex (Esther 3:15).
Inside the palace, the royal banquet hall (known as the Apadana) has been identified. It was a pillared room whose elaborately decorated columns were 65 feet tall.[1] This banquet hall saw the infamous feast of Xerxes when he drunkenly requested queen Vashti’s presence (Esther 1), it also was a main place of Nehemiah’s work as cupbearer to King Artaxerxes (Nehemiah 2). The very spot of the king’s throne in this banquet hall has been identified by its stone base centred between the pillars of the room.
The Palace itself was organized in a more Babylonian style incorporating three main courtyards that created a grand walkway through the palace on the way to the King’s throne room. These courtyards would have been decorated with stone reliefs and glazed bricks, and they were separated by guard houses. The book of Esther indicates that the outer courtyard was the place the Royal officials would come with their business and wait to be summoned by the king, as Haman providentially did (Esther 6:4).
So their are various writings confirming the Book of Esther and these are the Antiquities of the Jews by Josephus, the Apocryphal book of Tobit, and the Targum. Archeological discoveries also mentioned above also point to the truth about the Book of Esther. What is untrue, bias and lies is what is written in the Qur'an.
Mary daughter of Amara was a levite from the tribe of levy while Mary Mother of Jesus is from Juda’s tribe
Even 19:44 doesn't make sense because she's a descendant of the tribe of Judah
Adam, please make a video about Hijri in connection with 9 : 36-37
Seems someone in 7th century didnt know about earth's revolution and the effect of 11days deficit to the calculation of seasons.
He's just blabbing out illogicality.😂
Thank you sl mashrii
His entire adjustment is falesius
His is the biggest cry baby online. Islam has to be exposed for what it really is ex Sunni
تحياتي اليك اخي ادم من لاديني
If you can find relics/statues of mathematics, then you can claim putting your hands on the "traces of Abraham, Moses, Jacob..."
*The oneness of God is an abstract concept*
That's why *you can't find physical statues/relics/traces* referring to the messengers/apostles of God. As simple as that.
After watching the two i noticed that talking like a type writer and not listening keenly is dangerous
Nice videos. 👍
Thanks 👍
@@AdamElmasriEnglish you did great justice to this muslim miskeen.
His voice and style of presentation is so irritating it's difficult to listen to him shouting angrily.
I guess the Muslim dawah prefers loud and bold faced liars.
Keep up the good work exposing Islam for humanity's sake!
Mr. Adam, would you like to unveil about "alaqah" , a clot of blood blood. Can the "has been differentiated cell" like a clot of blood become another cell, for example it become a brain cell, a bone cell or a kidney cell medically without any genetic engineering ?
Nice try "I speak arabic" then you must know that Samiri and Samari are different words.The word Samari refers to the person from samaria and the word Samiri has completely different meaning.Samiri means to stay up late at night or to have conversations late at night which coincedentally describes the man exactly.Respond to this comment if you arent afraid.
I think you’re confusing Samiri with Samer سامر / السامر
Samer or Alsamer could mean the one who stays up at night (chatting at night). That word doesnt end in ‘i’
I can prove it and give examples in Arabic if you can read Arabic - can you?
@@AdamElmasriEnglish Nice try ignoring the main arguement.Samiri still does not mean from Samaria rather Samari does.Samiri especially in the context of the Quran does not mean The Samaritan.
@AdamElmasriEnglish
So the Quran is false eh?.
Prove all of this is false then?.
Quran 22:5 Embryology
th-cam.com/video/HdqpxdEeDdU/w-d-xo.html
Semen comes from backbone and ribs (Surah 86.5-7)*
Where is the seminal vesicle that makes most of the semen?. Between the backbone and ribs and which flows through and is released through his loins.
th-cam.com/video/Eya3ZKMdzIs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZsCbO1Y-ih7flIXE
The separation of two seas (salt water and fresh water) in the ocean
25:53 He is the One who merges the two
bodies of water. This is fresh and
palatable and this is salty and bitter. He
made between them a partition and an
inviolable barrier.
th-cam.com/video/DZqwGueBsPQ/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/4uwNcYf3mLU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/l9lu6mnpB14/w-d-xo.html
*The Big Bang in the Quran? There Is No Clash*
th-cam.com/video/l1vBXFhseMk/w-d-xo.html
So the Quran gets history wrong eh?.
*THE QURAN UNLOCKS SECRETS OF ANCIENT EGYPT*
th-cam.com/video/8BtpzK9qGPo/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/CM8VWH_38rE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=b72b52uamaUSe2LJ
th-cam.com/video/xAifpqAGANE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=JVcDwomMyYEN3EX6
15:26 We have created the human being from hardened CLAY of aged MUD.
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2488467/Scientists-believe-beginnings-CLAY.html
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131105132027.htm
Even richard dawkins agrees with that.
www.express.co.uk/news/world/752936/Humans-evolved-from-MUD-says-Richard-Dawkins-bible-was-right-evolution-bible
DNA CODE
th-cam.com/video/FrhRaNetisM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=lq3tOAzK5ZZ3Rzyi
Was muhammad a scientist?. Did anyone during the 7th century know about this?. NO, yet the Quran described this 1400 years before scientists actually discovered the reasons for this.
This is a book you want banned?.
Now, who did all of this, if not GOD?.
Deny that you idiot.
Why does an ex xtian even care that the Quran says that the cruxiFICTION didn't happen if as an ex xtian, you don't even believe in what the bible says anymore?.
Stupid.🙄
Syfe knows Arabic, he is moroccan. He gave explanations very clearly. Its up to you if you wanna accept it.
Damn his voice is really irritating
His first "refutation" also contradicts the Quran.
If it's okay to say that people belong to the same group as their descendants, like this guy argues for the Samaritan, then the Quran is wrong to say that Abraham wasn't a Jew.
So if this guy is right the Quran is wrong, and if he's wrong the Quran is also wrong. Gee, I wonder if the Quran might be wrong!
..... get your things right dude... how can abraham be a jew when "juda"ism didnt exist then.
He was ofc a Muslim, which literally means "someone who submits his will to GOD".
With GOD i mean Allah, the All-Powerfull, the All-Knowing.
@@kolavithonduraski5031 so when the Quran says there was a Samaritan during the time of Moses it's objectively wrong, since the Samaritans weren't a thing yet. Good to know that you believe the Quran is written in a flawed and ignorant way.
P.S According to Judaism, people like Abraham are categorized as "Noahides" (people who know Judaism is true but they're not descendants of the people who were at Mount Sinai so Jewish law doesn't apply to them).
@kolavithonduraski5031 someone who submits his will to God is such a poor description. By that definition anyone who practices a faith is a Muslim. Jews Christians Hindus Mormons. It belittles the Muslim faith with that charactisation
@@milamber2553 i wrote GOD, with big letters.. ofc the only true God, the Allmighty (who is only worth of worship) is ment.
this what the other religions submit to, is surely not the Allmighty and Allknowing God i meant.
It is what is literally meant by muslim, because there is obviously no Deity worthy of Worship except GOD.
@@kolavithonduraski5031 so you're rectifying the statement to those that worship your God? So Moses and Abraham and Jesus aren't Muslims.
The Tower Of Babel in Egypt? Tower of Babel was in Babylon Right? I mean the Myth. Next video for you.
The Quran mixed the two stories together, but there was no point of debating the Tower of Babel as such (since the Quran didn’t mention it by that name)… just wanted to stick to one point.
He slams the Bible as corrupt and that you should not have used it as a source, but doesn’t 3:3 in the Quran state “He (God) sent down to you the Book with the Truth, confirming what came before it; and He sent down the Torah and the Gospel.” Then in 6:115 “The Word of your Lord has been completed, in truth and justice. There is no changing to His words.” So it cannot be altered?This would invalidate his argument against using the Bible as a source.
What a time to be alive where well researched scholars respond to loudmouths on the internet. The future generations are gonna be so confused 200 years from now as they recount this in their history class 😂😂
The islamic dilemma of daughter of Amram and sister of Aaron being the virgin Mary is incapable as similar hadiths and other narrations mention her as being the daughter of Amram. This can be found everywhere in sunni and shia narrations and some even mention something like "when Amram married Hannah" and such. The "honorary title" claim is as new as the "royal" we/us/best of creators referring to Allat in the koran as we don't expect a 7th century illiterate meccan caravan robbers to know much about royalty and such.
What about 4-157
Islam cannot prove from a historical
Point of view that the crucifixion never happened
That Surah is a Big Lie
The bible can't prove either that the crucifixion did happen. No historical evidence has ever been found.
The Muslim guy clearly proved his case
Hello sir, nice video and nice responds...
Do you have the studies of Abraham's father?
In islam it say it is Azar, while in the bible its Terah....
Ofc Islam is wrong. They took biblical stories and corrupted the details. Details that have nothing to do with Muhammad and which no jew or christian would deem worthy of corruption.
The guy is very smart according to his gullible followers
Al lah says he is the best provider for believers 65:3. Muhammad also states this (Sahih Muslim 2715).
Any Muslim that has moved to non Islamic lands for better lives and opportunities prove Allah did not provide for them or their families, inadvertently proving Allah, quran and Muhammad as false!
you were so kind in your video yet he responded to you with such an aggresive and arrogant tone
Mary the mother of Jesus is from Judah tribe, while Moses, his sister Mary, and Aroon were from the tribe of Levi. Mary was not descendant of Aroon nor Moses.... and Elizabeth was her cousin from the tribe of Levi....
13:44
SYFE has the guts to call it a mistake when the Qur'an is clearly in error here!
He fails to address both sides of the argument:
1. Maryam sister of Haaron
2. Maryam daughter of Imran
How do Muslims reconcile the second claim? The fact that there are 2 criteria in identifying this Maryam in question from the Qur'an, then it's very clear that the Qur'an made a blatant error.
The Qur'an gets it totally wrong because it also refers to her as the daughter of Imran.
How does SYFE dare to claim that you're using the Christian and Jewish Bible as a source of credible information.
you didnt watch SYFE's Full Video, right ❓😅
@@kolavithonduraski5031 😂 seems comprehension is really a problem for some people.
It’s not my fault that you don’t understand that the Quran gets their identities wrong.
Miriam the daughter of Imran and the sister of Aaron (Haroon) was a very different person from Mary (the mother of Jesus Christ).
These two people (Miriam & Mary) both lived centuries apart from each other and it’s very clear the Quran has gotten their identities wrong from each other.
Had the Quran stated only “Miriam sister of Aaron” or “Miriam daughter of Imran” alone by itself then SYFE’s assertion would hold some validity or weight.
@@NathanKwadade ok, so you didnt watch the whole video, otherwise you wouldnt use this already debunked claim 😅
@@kolavithonduraski5031Nothing has been debunked. The Mary who is the Daughter of Imran and sister of Aaron is also the sister of Moses. Your quran is fake.
This is in addition to the other fake stories the quran copied like Suleiman and the talking ants 🐜, the sleepers of the Cave, etc.
All of them are fake.
@@patrick953 for non-intelligent people everything seems fake 😅 obviously
I like the cancer analogy 👍👍👍
Its wrong just because you have decided that it's wrong !
please make a video on flat earth in quran and hadith
theres no flat earth in quran its says spread out there is no quran scientific mistake
.... 😂😂😂 this so called argument is refuted thounsand times....
debunked thousands of times
*Where are the videos on Genocide in the Bible. You do know the explicit verses*
You mean sahih al-bukhari 2926 😮
Or all the verses in quran 😮there are to many of them 😢
Lol people used to use their ancestor names. And why is there 2 name Mary here if one doesnt derived it from her ancestor?
You're the man....peace be upon you 😊
I appreciate that 😊
16:17 didn't you do the same thing you criticized him for doing?
38:02 and then he calls his videos academic???
Syfetalk is a joke. His videos are full of ignorance of the Bible. Like you just said, he does not know what he's talking about. The scary thing is, he think that he refute everything😅
How long have Moses been with the Israelites before Moses was called to take the codes of law (that is today called TORAH). Remember, the Quran never said Allah gave him a law by the name "TORAH". Thus, it is plausible that the Israelites were already given sets of instructions to follow before the ones on tablets was given to him
The observers of the law cannot exist before the law!!
iknow yeah bro adam is refutable dr luxemberg refuted this
It is the case of smart people can pretend to be stupid but stupid man can not pretend to be smart lol
He actually claims to read both Arabic and Hebrew. I had the audacity to tell him once, about his poor English. Then he informed me that he also speaks French. He's Moroccan btw, don't they speak Arabic?
Anyway, thanks for a great video.
Moroccans speak an interesting type of Arabic that is heavily French influenced.
I would probably trust his French a lot more than his English (or Arabic)
@@AdamElmasriEnglish
Ok, thanks for info. His English melody is extremely difficult to follow, it almost has a Scandinavian touch to it. Do Egyptians speak Arabic?
@@chriss2452 yes. And also mandatory in the school curriculum to study formal Arabic for 16 years.
@@AdamElmasriEnglish Ok! Are there other languages in Egypt? I mean like, is there such a thing as "Egyptian"?
@@chriss2452That would be Coptic, which is sometimes used in Coptic orthodox religious ceremonies.
The muslim apologist is trying his best to defend the nonsense in quran. Shobanaazmiollah! Without lies islam dies...been 1400 over years
Imran was the father of Moses, Aaron and Miriam but NOT the Virgin Mary….her father was Jaockim and he lived about 1,500 years after Imran. In the Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican traditions, Saint Joachim was the husband of Saint Anne and the father of Mary, the mother of Jesus. The story of Joachim and Anne appears first in the apocryphal Gospel of James. Joachim and Anne are not mentioned in the Bible.
There is many ways to confirm if it the same Mary from the bible and the Quran you should do more research.
Hi again mr Elmasri!
Dr Luxemburg believes that the traditionalist might be right when it comes to the Sister of Aaron and the Mary Surah. He believes the title to be a comparison with the "moral" behavior of Aaron’s sister, who (like her mother) was not a "whore".
There is a possibility that ”the syster of Aaron” could be a dishonorary title that Mary’s people gave her in the sense of ” syster of the Samiri” or ”the Sister of the Missguided One” like son of a B.
In 4:156 the Quran is accusing the People of Israel of uttering a gross lie against Mary and this could be a direct reference to the syster of Aaron or the syster of the Samiri.
”They are condemned) for disbelieving and uttering about Mary a gross lie.”
Thanks, Adam
The video you were responding to really did not justify the effort, of itself, either by its argumentation or its method and acting. It was a risible piece of da'wah, a very poor apology for apologetics. His method is that of many da’i, to act as if assertion were of itself proof, and that opposition is the same as refutation. His affected gestures of disrespect and disdain were wholly unconvincing-as if taking a drink were an insult; it’s not the action when, for example Nick Freitas does it-it’s the whole way he does it, like Pierre Poilièvre eating his apple at the reporter he humiliated. This feeble da’i goes through the motions without any evidence of understanding what the motions are supposed to achieve.
Seems like everything is hypothetical. None of you guys were there when it happened.
One relies on the words of God while the other relies on the words of the Godless. If you rely on the words of God, you can be saved from errors as God is merciful but if you rely on the words of the Godless you and none other than yourself is to be blamed for the errors or misinterpretation. Think before it is too late!
What you just explained is known as Pascal's wager, which is not true btw.
Also, it is not just words. I am Egyptian. I grew up in Egypt and I knowy history and monuments well. I know for a fact that the Egyptians never built highrise with clay! That's no one's words!
Quran says Bibi Mariyam was guided by Allah for not speak, when she came back to her people they asked sister of Harun, your father was not a corrupt person and your mother was not a whore but you have done a blunder. Sura Mariyam verse 27 and 28. It’s narrated in Hadith Muslim Sharif 2135 and in Tirmiji 3155 when a follower of Hazrat Muhammad (SA) named Mugira sent to Christians they asked in Quran why it is mentioned that Bibi Mariyam was the sister of Harun? Mugira didn’t know the answer and asked Hazrat Muhammad (SA) about it. He replied at that time it was a tradition of Bani Israilis to named as the prophets. Basically Hazrat Harun (A) brother of Hazrat Musa (A) and Bibi Mariyam’s brother Harun was not the same man.
Is it True that in The Holy Bible Why the Gyneology of Jesus Christ is Different in Mathew 1-1 and Luke 3-23.. In Mathew 1-1 The Father of Joseph the Carpenter is Jacob And in Luke 3-23 The Father of Joseph the Carpenter is Heli..??🙏🙏🙏
A reminder: *Adam is an ex-Christian who almost never tackles the biblical beliefs* 😁
Adam is not an ex-Muslim Just remember this much