Russia Unveils New Fighter Jet Viewed As Competitor To America's F-35

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ค. 2024
  • Russia has unveiled a new fighter jet, with the intention of eventually selling it to the rest of the world. NBC News’ Matt Bodner, the first Western journalist able to see the jet in person, provides a preview to NBC News NOW.
    » Subscribe to NBC News: nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC
    » Watch more NBC video: bit.ly/MoreNBCNews
    NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.
    Connect with NBC News Online!
    NBC News App: smart.link/5d0cd9df61b80
    Breaking News Alerts: link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/bre...
    Visit NBCNews.Com: nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
    Find NBC News on Facebook: nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
    Follow NBC News on Twitter: nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
    Follow NBC News on Instagram: nbcnews.to/InstaNBC
    #Russia #FighterJet #NBCNews

ความคิดเห็น • 2.3K

  • @theamericanbadger6008
    @theamericanbadger6008 3 ปีที่แล้ว +559

    Ace Combat devs when they see this new plane: write that down! Write that down!

    • @Waddle_Dee_With_Internet
      @Waddle_Dee_With_Internet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      And so as War Thunder and they’ll sell it in premium

    • @mrandrossguy9871
      @mrandrossguy9871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The ASF-X and X-02 are Both practical crafts or the ugly Apalis XFA-24A

    • @zathary564
      @zathary564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Waddle_Dee_With_Internet definitely 11.3 material

    • @solisortus6241
      @solisortus6241 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mrandrossguy9871 don't call my baby ugly like that :(

    • @honda8720
      @honda8720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dcs

  • @johnpaul252003
    @johnpaul252003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +185

    This reporter is now back in the US debriefing the C.I.A.

    • @Maweresistance
      @Maweresistance 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      About seeing the screen as opposed to CPU of a cellphone as in Apple v Huawei? Hehe. You got jokes!

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah, cause high priority spies are escorted and allowed such privileges 🤣

    • @johnpaul252003
      @johnpaul252003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@j.ballsdeep420 dah! Its a joke, bit of sarcasm. chill out

    • @j.ballsdeep420
      @j.ballsdeep420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@johnpaul252003 -- Pretty stupid joke, with a bit of stupidity. Say something stupid, expect a stupid response

    • @johnpaul252003
      @johnpaul252003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@j.ballsdeep420 Take a chill pill.

  • @Spectre-tv7wi
    @Spectre-tv7wi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    America: makes F35*
    Everyone: criticising the jet
    China: makes an exact copy but worse
    Everyone: wait what?

    • @nikobelic4251
      @nikobelic4251 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just gotta learn to take it and deal with it.

    • @honda8720
      @honda8720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I like the design of the f35B the vtol is pretty cool

    • @nikobelic4251
      @nikobelic4251 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@honda8720 i like all three they are all great fighters

    • @honda8720
      @honda8720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nikobelic4251 agreed

    • @Spectre-tv7wi
      @Spectre-tv7wi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I love the F35. It really doesn’t deserve that much hate

  • @unknownz1238
    @unknownz1238 3 ปีที่แล้ว +368

    Every journalist:So this plane is really good, modern, the wings are stealth probably, probably holds a lot of weapons, and has latest technology

    • @richardmartin6533
      @richardmartin6533 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yeah, except for the IR scanner by the cockpit, the 2 ram-air scoops under each ruddervator...

    • @ducnguyen-iv9px
      @ducnguyen-iv9px 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      But it didn’t fly yet until 2023!!! How did they know!?

    • @MonkeyPoida
      @MonkeyPoida 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      He's saying that there is zero depth to this journalism. No comment at all about the engines, avionics, layout of cockpit. The journalist probably doesn't know what he's looking at.

    • @coreyjacobs2718
      @coreyjacobs2718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Big Iron im not sure how since this is just a mock up he'll the Russians dont even know what this jet could do yet

    • @coreyjacobs2718
      @coreyjacobs2718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Big Iron im saying this jet is just a mock up there are no engines no stealth coating, radar, nothing there is nothing to report because its not even an actual flying aircraft its just a concept.

  • @8av8today
    @8av8today 3 ปีที่แล้ว +349

    That’s like the friend that always has a sticker that says “under construction “ on his beater truck.

    • @VF1Skullangel
      @VF1Skullangel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      At least the beater truck runs. this won't

    • @LaikaTheG
      @LaikaTheG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@VF1Skullangel Especially when they try to use it in “Austere environments” with that huge f16/x32 intake. That thing is gonna eat fod for a living

    • @estebanrojasr
      @estebanrojasr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VF1Skullangel …and you say that based on your extensive knowledge and experience in the industry ?

    • @HATCHERlive
      @HATCHERlive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      exactly! why no flying show? haha, another cardboard prototype to try to impress, what is this the 90's hahahaha

    • @8av8today
      @8av8today 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VF1Skullangel savage

  • @cnav9758
    @cnav9758 3 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    US: i think its time unveil our ufo stealth fighter
    Bob Lazar: Bet

    • @bodombeastmode
      @bodombeastmode 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Bob Lazar is a proven liar dude.

    • @cnav9758
      @cnav9758 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@bodombeastmode send me the source

    • @KingPaimon666
      @KingPaimon666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Bob Lazar in 1989 mentioned (UFOs in possession of the US government) were being powered by this mysterious element called "115", but his claims were tagged "absurd" from the scientific community because they had no knowledge of such element till 2002 came around that is was then confirmed.

    • @PANOSDX1968
      @PANOSDX1968 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Brothers, if u only knew!!!!!

    • @knowledge3563
      @knowledge3563 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      all ufo is from russia google it

  • @rossnpc3448
    @rossnpc3448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    looking at the comments it seems that everyone became a fighter jet expert suddenly

    • @Mr.Robert1
      @Mr.Robert1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So true.
      From the video games people are playing they lost touch with reality.
      1991 Airforce. I did what I had to do.
      My girl was the old
      A-10 before all the updates we have today. Stealth is a waist of money. There has been a way around it since day one.

    • @gunlover92
      @gunlover92 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right? Drives me crazy. They read a few news articles and suddenly know everything. They spit out all these buzz words and opinions they hear from other people

  • @rahamanbhuiyan5317
    @rahamanbhuiyan5317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    The journalist looks nervous when sitting in the cockpit😂

    • @Ghostface944
      @Ghostface944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah even though he’s allowed, he def has that body language like he feels he shouldn’t be there

    • @kineticdeath
      @kineticdeath 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Ghostface944 probably some KGB sniper on overwatch the entire time. Any funny business and the video never gets out, and 2 body bags turn up in some random Siberian morgue

  • @rijve11
    @rijve11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +227

    From the moment he enters cockpit 2:44 he has no idea how to describe what he's seeing Lol 😅

    • @camiloardila2399
      @camiloardila2399 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Kinda looks like there might now be real components since it's at an open show .
      Sounds like the usa is loosing it's guilded age . Completely.
      But here comes the big protective wall....
      That mexico paid for .... Yeah right .

    • @camiloardila2399
      @camiloardila2399 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kurthaas4331 I bet you've called donald....daddy.
      And you are also not over AND scared of Obama's BBC. 🤣

    • @RickyVall3y
      @RickyVall3y 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@camiloardila2399 what does Obama have to do with this? Show some respect

    • @outsider2639
      @outsider2639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@camiloardila2399 usa is already working on a 6th gen fighter jet while russia is still working on 5th gens

    • @Hangar-zu8xg
      @Hangar-zu8xg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@camiloardila2399 its 5th gen, still in development, and likely for another half decade. We are already producing hundreds of F-35 II. We are already hearing rumors of the 6th gen. Even with the SU-57, which is supposed to be equal to the F-22, is behind. They have a couple SU-57s, meanwhile the US is already planning to retire the F-22.

  • @smolcan4984
    @smolcan4984 3 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    They really selling military equipment like “bit here is the YF-23” lite version

    • @Username-jb2vs
      @Username-jb2vs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      My thoughts exactly 😄 who said you could copy our homework only china's allowed to do that

    • @jamergamer0076
      @jamergamer0076 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I knew I had seen that look b4.

    • @ryanneal9754
      @ryanneal9754 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I thought I was the only one. That tail looks like the black widow. 😂

    • @krishnagopal3154
      @krishnagopal3154 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many aircraft looks same

    • @Username-jb2vs
      @Username-jb2vs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@krishnagopal3154 Many look similar sure but that has to do with physics and application of the plane. Passenger planes all look the same also because it looks professional among other desirable features and effects When you get into the military side of things or the kit planes or even just what's underneath the hood like avionics etc.. You couldn't be any further from the truth. Each plane in the military is designed for one specific task period. That task might be multi role. So technically more than one task but it's still built for a specific peice of the puzzle called multi domain Operations. Thank you for coming to my Ted talk. There may or may not be Tesla keys under your chair Oprah was here before me

  • @MikMoen
    @MikMoen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Sukhoi publicly: "Not sure should see plane, very secret, but go head."
    Sukhoi privately: "Take much video, want to brag and rub in face."

  • @TheBL-ZNL
    @TheBL-ZNL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    "cannot find a similar back design", YF-23: "I'm I a joke to you?"

  • @NoName-sb9tp
    @NoName-sb9tp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    The Checkmate’s air intake look like a smiley face. Like that Boeing X-32 prototype

    • @anthonyk423
      @anthonyk423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It looks exactly like the f22 competitor for the air force years back.

    • @retardingretard6535
      @retardingretard6535 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@anthonyk423 Wash your Eyes

    • @annafihoq72
      @annafihoq72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ya I had the same feeling

    • @xxuniquexx1000
      @xxuniquexx1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is because of Russian hack thefts

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@xxuniquexx1000 ahhahhaha like america never steals, they litarly stole the Me P.1101 design for the F-86 Sabre

  • @someone.............
    @someone............. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    It looks like a YF-23 Black Widow but with single jet engine

    • @arcturionblade1077
      @arcturionblade1077 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ditto. I thought the same thing.

    • @305jarhead8
      @305jarhead8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I Agree,they tried to change it up
      a tiny bit.
      China and Russia Coping Americas Hardware,Nothing New.
      China's J-20 Copy of the F-35.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@305jarhead8 J-20 does look nothing like the F-35

    • @traw7021
      @traw7021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@305jarhead8 J-20 looks more like the f-22 raptor

    • @talismenf2253
      @talismenf2253 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      nah looks like the x32

  • @sammykeys1882
    @sammykeys1882 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Russia - "So stealthy, they won't see"
    America - "Can we interview ur jet fam?"

  • @wesleyp3974
    @wesleyp3974 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    “I cant show you the inside”
    2 minutes later showing the inside on the reveal screen

    • @arthurneddysmith
      @arthurneddysmith 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They didn't display the inside of the cockpit. The video at 3:31 was a mock-up visual released (no doubt) by the designers with permission from the Russian government. Real cockpit screens don't have descriptions like "video and visual piloting guidance".

  • @arcturionblade1077
    @arcturionblade1077 3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    Looks like a discount single engine version of the YF-23.

    • @zx169
      @zx169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I would say the opposite, that the YF 32 was a clunky, ugly prototype and this model perfected that design concept. But as they say, looks are subjective..

    • @janselkennethtolentino8269
      @janselkennethtolentino8269 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@zx169 i think he was talking about northrop's YF-23 (the black widow)

    • @janselkennethtolentino8269
      @janselkennethtolentino8269 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      probably because of the rear section.

    • @zx169
      @zx169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@janselkennethtolentino8269 Ah ok yes my bad, but looking at the YF 23 (one of my favourite all time US aircraft), I see even less resemblance lol, for sure it reminds me more of the YF 32 due to single engine and intake location. But in general, I think the Su 75 is one of the most unique designs of a 5th gen. I simply don't see any copy in it.

    • @xxuniquexx1000
      @xxuniquexx1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amen

  • @0Caracalla
    @0Caracalla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    Defense contractors licking their chops at these new contracts that come out of the tax payer's pockets. It never ends.

    • @elvenkind6072
      @elvenkind6072 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The 6th generation will need to be completely AI controlled, with autonomous abilities, not a single aircraft, but a swarm, probably miniature, with visual and audio transmission, explosives and more accurate targeting abilities.
      I didn't sleep last night.

    • @neffosnine2970
      @neffosnine2970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@elvenkind6072 - "but Hitler, probably miniature".... "but Napoleon, probably miniature".... "but Sputnik-1, probably miniature".... "but Gagarin, probably miniature"... "but Avangard doomsday torpedo, probably miniature"... 😊😊😊

    • @venividivici8672
      @venividivici8672 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      We can thank defense contractors for a lot of the innovations we take for granted today.

    • @neffosnine2970
      @neffosnine2970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@venividivici8672 -- *Drang nah Osten* ?! 😊 Welcome! :))) As always, all uninvited guests will receive 2 sq.m. of the Russian land. (in the form of fertilizer: what gorgeous fields in Stalingrad).

    • @shane7133
      @shane7133 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those pesky defense contractors, oops I mean VETERANS who are finally getting paid more after serving their country. How terrible!

  • @chaosland5325
    @chaosland5325 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    America : Let's unveil our reversed engineering UFO fighter jet soon.

    • @fakename789
      @fakename789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You joke, but there's a small chance America (or some other nation) has one.

    • @fakename789
      @fakename789 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Brendon O'Connell III interesting. Would it be on par with the U.S. f22 or f35 because of this?

    • @Idk-zc4li
      @Idk-zc4li 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Brendon O'Connell III agreed

    • @FedericoLucchi
      @FedericoLucchi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fantasy's land indeed!

  • @saltysovereign
    @saltysovereign 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    “It’s very modern and sleek, it has this very modern design feature in the back, it’s very smooth and sleek, it doesn’t have a rear elevator (so scary😧), it’s obviously being made as a counter to the 35, the cockpit is so cool, and it’s still in development.”

  • @CGHawkatoo
    @CGHawkatoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Su-75: Do you remember vodka?
    F-35B: Sammich

  • @lostinmuzak
    @lostinmuzak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    Design. Like a car prototype. Years to production and then in service. Needs billions of dollars.

    • @AnyoneCanSee
      @AnyoneCanSee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are starting with the plan for the Tempest, Eurofighter etc. The Italian defence contractor Leonardo hack that crazy people tried to tie into the American election was actually to get to target details of Europe’s biggest unmanned fighter jet programme and aircraft.
      This is what Russia does. They let others spend the money and then steal the plan and try and improve upon them.
      This new Russian jet looks identical to the Tempest. He said he's never seen a design like that at the rear but that's how the Tempest is.

    • @zx169
      @zx169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Correct but its new engine is in development, only to be completed in around 2027. F35 is also not that stealthy from the back. The Russian stealth doctrine is to make it SOMEWHAT stealthy form the front, enough to make sure the adversary's radar won't lock on until it is relatively close. From the back its an entirely different story. Basically, this is a more defensive doctrine designed to take on incoming hostile targets head on, buying them enough time to get in close range to use their superior manoeuvrability, otherwise why keep the IRST bubble on the nose (with its horrible stealth characteristics)?

    • @305jarhead8
      @305jarhead8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AnyoneCanSee If you look at Northrop YF-23 looks Strikingly similar to this Russian SU-75 Checkmate.

    • @AnyoneCanSee
      @AnyoneCanSee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@305jarhead8 - Sure, I don't claim to be any sort of expert but this guy mentions that the Russian plane has no rear elevator and that he could not think of another plane that didn't. The new Tempest doesn't have a rear elevator. All three look alike from the side but the American ones do have rear elevators.
      The Tempests claims to be a 6th generation aircraft and was only unveiled a couple of years ago.
      My only real point was that the Russians have been caught successfully hacking Leonardo Aerospace a few years ago and two Italian guys went on trial for that and they were after stealth fighter designs. My point is that Russia tends to take from everyone and try and improve upon it which is how they save a lot on development costs.
      I remember when they had a working space shuttle with a few years of the Americans unveiling theirs. It looked identical and it's pretty obvious they didn't developed it, they stole it. Sorry waffled.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@305jarhead8 nah it just looks kinda similar the wings etc are way different and it has an different rear and only one engine also the front intake does look different too russia clearly didnt copy the YF-23

  • @kevesor9973
    @kevesor9973 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Looks pretty familiar wonder who gave them our blueprints

    • @ericstapleton9577
      @ericstapleton9577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Their hackers, or our frugal friends

    • @zurinarctus1329
      @zurinarctus1329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Solarwinds hack of 2020.

    • @Hangar-zu8xg
      @Hangar-zu8xg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When building a stealth fighter, they will all look about the same. Theres only so many shapes. Also the intakes are entirely different.

  • @sir.meximanii4582
    @sir.meximanii4582 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Russia: Lemme copy and paste the f35

  • @unreliablenarrator6649
    @unreliablenarrator6649 3 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    If it is a direct competitor to the F-35, does that mean it is over-priced and under-performs?

    • @knowledge3563
      @knowledge3563 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      f35 is for sure over-priced and i little bird can take it down
      Tiny bird takes down most expensive fighter jet ever built
      th-cam.com/video/EFo-5TBIRPI/w-d-xo.html
      if a little bird can do this what u think russia can do

    • @garrydimasa1964
      @garrydimasa1964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It isn't as good against an F-35 even in the best scenario if we assume all data released by the Russian MOD is right. But it's way cheaper then F-35, like only half or a third of F-35 price. So the market here is difference then the one the US targeted. In short, considering it price, it do the job decently.

    • @knowledge3563
      @knowledge3563 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@garrydimasa1964 how u can comment this it isn't as good against an F-35
      when the new russian jet not fly yet but still u think f35 the best but sure if i pay what usa want for the f35 it better be the best but its not to much money and little birds can take it off line well it say it all
      everyone understand russia is the real power
      russia take on f15 no problems
      th-cam.com/video/1gO0Vb1tuRw/w-d-xo.html
      russia takes on f16 no problems
      th-cam.com/video/TYvP82D_qYI/w-d-xo.html
      'F-35 hopeless, less battleworthy than Soviet jets from Cold War'
      th-cam.com/video/cP0f1_f8nuc/w-d-xo.html

    • @kiabtoomlauj6249
      @kiabtoomlauj6249 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This is just ONE degree above being a card-board-cut-up model.
      By the time they are able to make this FLY and FIX all the bug, it'd be around the 2030s already, about time America's 6th gen is nearing completion (4th full stealth aircraft: after the B-2/F-22, the F-35, and the upcoming B-21), so, to piggyback on your question: yes, by the time the Russians manage to FINISH their still-in-progress next-gen ENGINE, put it in this mid size Su-75, fix all the bugs on engine and avionics, it'd be in the same boat as the F-35 (which really are 3 completely different jets, with the F-35 being able to land and take off vertically, something the Su-75/check mate would NEVER be able to do)...

    • @sanusiebarrie7225
      @sanusiebarrie7225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Wast of $$$ the human race don’t need weapons

  • @zx169
    @zx169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +204

    Small mistake: This particular prototype WILL fly in about 2023. It probably can already fly, just needs more testing etc. Also, 57 isn't trolling F22 and F35, it is a Sukhoi tradition starting form Su 7, Su 17, Su 27, Su 37, Su 47 (that reverse swept wing prototype) and finally Su 57. I am more surprised they didn't name it the Su 67 but they explained that it had to do with 5 and 7 being Sukhoi's "lucky numbers". This was said by the chief designer during its presentation.

    • @_flyingcat_7527
      @_flyingcat_7527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What about su-30 and su-35?

    • @zx169
      @zx169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@_flyingcat_7527 what about them?

    • @_flyingcat_7527
      @_flyingcat_7527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@zx169 they go against that sukhoi tradition

    • @zx169
      @zx169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@_flyingcat_7527 Maybe, but I believe that was not my point in the correction of what this journalist said.

    • @thedebatemechannel4746
      @thedebatemechannel4746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The troll is Checkmate, not 57

  • @rthelionheart
    @rthelionheart 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A dog fight against a Gripen E39 would be something else indeed.

  • @clueless_guerito
    @clueless_guerito 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When you let someone copy your homework

  • @DataWaveTaGo
    @DataWaveTaGo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Reporter: How does it handle?
    Test pilot strapping in: Hold my vodka!

    • @user-gq2ok7cz3e
      @user-gq2ok7cz3e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In your Hollywood films, Russians drink, and Russia is ranked 64th in the world .

  • @cherrypoptart2001
    @cherrypoptart2001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    The fact the russians managed to kept the development of this aircraft a secret unlike the SU-57 makes me wonder how much projects they're secretly working on right now

    • @Stizzz0
      @Stizzz0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Americas getting old at what they do

    • @LaikaTheG
      @LaikaTheG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      You could say the same about America. No one knew we had a stealth hawk until it crashed in the Osama raid

    • @moochoopr9551
      @moochoopr9551 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You and I don't know. Not the intelligence agency.

    • @cooliod45
      @cooliod45 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      The US has already flown their 6th gen plane...

    • @philb5593
      @philb5593 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They said it’s only been under development for a year, so that would be why it’s still secretive.

  • @nelyrions1838
    @nelyrions1838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    If it's a competitor to F-35, it should be jampacked with an insane amount of technologies. This seems more like a successor of Mig 29.

    • @lynx8437
      @lynx8437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It most probably is jampacked with insane amounts on new technologies and weapons but its confidential just like the top speed on British ships.

    • @Ghostface944
      @Ghostface944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Russia is a lot more uptight about their tech unlike America which seems to have lost its ability to “speak softy and carry a big stick”

    • @Jay-jb2vr
      @Jay-jb2vr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      American fighter jet technology is *highly classified*

    • @Ghostface944
      @Ghostface944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Jay-jb2vr I guess I’m mainly talking about the F-35, seems like the US has been gloating it. But I also think the stuff we have in skunkworks, which I’m sure is already flight ready, if not already in full combat use, we won’t hear about for years

    • @knowledge3563
      @knowledge3563 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2 or 3 days ago A British F-35 fighter jet has crashed into the sea
      during a routine operation in the Mediterranean, the Ministry of Defence
      has said.
      £100m British fighter jet crashes into Mediterranean

  • @timwelch175
    @timwelch175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Im just going to "lol" and move on with my day. Same thing I did when China claimed to have made an F22 competitor. Y'all got about 20 more years. Wake me when there is something to fear.

    • @-ABC-
      @-ABC- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I see what you're saying, but this is Russia though not China. The Russian gov didn't make this, a Russian private company did.

    • @InterstellarTaco
      @InterstellarTaco 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@-ABC- you realize the parent company of Sukhoi is majority owned by the Russian Government right? Lol

    • @QueenDaenerysTargaryen
      @QueenDaenerysTargaryen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      J20, j31 and su57

    • @Student0Toucher
      @Student0Toucher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@-ABC- America has already been working on the 6th gen jet lmao

    • @-ABC-
      @-ABC- 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@InterstellarTaco Same can be said for Lockheed Martin and the US government, the entire military industrial complex for that matter. Lockheed is a military branch of the US gov. I see these two companies are being the same, i have no reason to doubt Russia here.

  • @RazvanMGH
    @RazvanMGH 3 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    It looks cool standing still. Will be a great statue.

    • @johnf.kennedy
      @johnf.kennedy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      cringe

    • @fresconle7939
      @fresconle7939 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Boeing x32 great statue clown 🤡🤡🤡

    • @Levrai10
      @Levrai10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @joshuawatts1924
      @joshuawatts1924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It isn’t even scheduled to take its first flight until 2023. Let’s see if that even happens lol

    • @lucastekkan
      @lucastekkan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fresconle7939 the X-32 actually flew, unlike this

  • @scip11
    @scip11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I was expecting a saucer... or a tic-tac!

    • @quinnard9750
      @quinnard9750 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @timexkills65
      @timexkills65 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kids

    • @kennethc2466
      @kennethc2466 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was expecting Russian propaganda, and a Sukhoi advertisement, with zero informative value. I got exactly that.

  • @willadventure4adventures226
    @willadventure4adventures226 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Only took 30 years to get there f 22 still king dog and it'll be replaced with the gofaster version soon.

    • @patrickmartin6977
      @patrickmartin6977 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm 100% convinced the DoD didn't fight against canceling the F22 harder because they don't really want people knowing how good it actually is. I mean all it took for a cancel was China getting part of the plans. They still can't get their rip off to work so the DoD was like we got enough to train let's just shut up if we need em we can build more

  • @USDOTATF
    @USDOTATF 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is like that one friend which said "Yeah, I'll change some answers" when you gave them your homework

  • @sdfplanespotting
    @sdfplanespotting 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    New Russia fighter jet: I came from the landfill
    US F-35 I came from a 80 million dollar mansion

    • @cosmoevents21st56
      @cosmoevents21st56 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Bet the landfill will out do the mansion any day of the week.

    • @Saboguin
      @Saboguin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wdym by “Landfill”?

    • @pedropistolero9230
      @pedropistolero9230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      F-35, a very expensive flying turd

    • @_flyingcat_7527
      @_flyingcat_7527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pedropistolero9230 how so

    • @sdfplanespotting
      @sdfplanespotting 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_flyingcat_7527 exactly

  • @westhomp1721
    @westhomp1721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    It’s just a prototype?? . It’s like taking an unproven rifle into the battle field. A little to late to show.

    • @sullythepankake9663
      @sullythepankake9663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ours had been out to the public for over a decade lol

    • @mohdnazreen5892
      @mohdnazreen5892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hello, until it has proven into the battlefield, Su35 will take the cover

    • @chimichangapoops6244
      @chimichangapoops6244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah it takes time for things to be tested and accepted for production. YF-22 prototypes started design in the 1980’s, first flew in 1990, and didn’t enter service until 2005.

    • @FedericoLucchi
      @FedericoLucchi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what airshows are for. The f-35 was presented to the public waaayyy before it could do anything reliably, and it still needs updates...

  • @oryjen
    @oryjen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    "Competitor to USA's F-35"... Woaw... What an effort!

    • @bcshelby4926
      @bcshelby4926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ...ironic in that the SU-75 "Checkmate" is considered to be a competitor to the F-35 as the latter was initially based off of a former Soviet/Russian concept known as the Yakolev-141, a VTOL fighter being developed for former Soviet, then after the fall, Russian Navy for carrier operations. When that project began running into financial difficulties Lockheed/Martin (the main contractor for the F-35) stepped in and infused over 400$ million into continued development which gave them complete access to all all the technical data involved. The company also ordered two flying prototypes plus a static test airframe for further evaluation (none of which were ever completed or delivered as the Russian Navy shut the entire programme down by the mid 1990s)
      Though the YK 141 was much larger and heavier (as well as not stealthy at all), it also suffered from mediocre manoeuvrability and performance as well as high development costs. One of the main similarities between the two is the engine placement, as well as design of the swivelling nozzle for the "C" variant of the F-35 along with use of auxiliary lift engines to stabilise it in VTOL operation (though the YK 141 used two small vertically mounted turbofans while the F-35C employs a large ducted fan just aft of the cockpit).

    • @Psycho-zb4ee
      @Psycho-zb4ee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ???

    • @lucastekkan
      @lucastekkan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bcshelby4926 another one who doesn't know what he is saying

    • @metacube9913
      @metacube9913 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      wat

  • @Stiff-in-the-morning
    @Stiff-in-the-morning 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Amazing how it looks like a cross between the F-22 and the F-35. Most of those wizbangery avionic displays won’t make it into the production bird if it is produced.

  • @ihavenoname3925
    @ihavenoname3925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    just remember if they're revealing it, it means they've a new one under development secretly

  • @zillennialj8125
    @zillennialj8125 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This sounds awfully familiar to when Russia unveiled it’s ‘answer’ to the F-22. 🤣

    • @meikel1492
      @meikel1492 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      and no matter how hard the russians try or how many aircraft they design they will never outclass the F-22 and F-35 LOL

    • @one_step_sideways
      @one_step_sideways 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@meikel1492 Especially since the F-22s and F-35s already down themselves. Of course Russia can't keep up with all the hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayers' money being wasted carelessly. F-35 has neither the maneuverability nor the speed (or the supersonic cruise capabilities for that matter) of the Checkmate. Or the Su-57, that will be getting the new Izdeliye-30 engines that would allow it to fly at supersonic speeds without an afterburner. Meanwhile the US is still incapable of fixing the 600+ design flaws of the F-35 that it has. Oh, and what about the AGM-183 test that has been conducted just last week when it splashed down in the ocean when it couldn't start flying? And it doesn't even have the same range as the Dagger missile.
      All of you in this comment section were thoroughly brainwashed by the mainstream media it seems. You still have to go through those age old coping tropes of reassuring yourself that your overengineered and overpriced planes are better than anything in the world. Well guess what, they aren't anymore. And the contracts that were made after the announcement of Checkmate is proof of that.

    • @SIoyvenheaven1T800m101
      @SIoyvenheaven1T800m101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@one_step_sideways The F-22 and F-35 will clap any Russian aircraft, like we always do. Keep quiet.

    • @one_step_sideways
      @one_step_sideways 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@SIoyvenheaven1T800m101 "Source: dude trust me"

    • @SIoyvenheaven1T800m101
      @SIoyvenheaven1T800m101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@one_step_sideways I don’t trust you.

  • @aesop8694
    @aesop8694 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    There are no bigger fools in life than those who underestimate the strength and resolution of their opponents to fight.

    • @daebak7370
      @daebak7370 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Military checkpoints will be set up on us interstates for covid vaccination certification. Camps will be activated. Police state/genocide is coming. New world order led by obama and pope francis is coming. Jesus christ is coming back for the rapture. Get ready. Dont believe the coming ufo alien abduction narrative

    • @magnusrex9683
      @magnusrex9683 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@daebak7370 sit down fool🤣

  • @United2K
    @United2K 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Looks good from the outside. Tech is another thing.

    • @craftpaint1644
      @craftpaint1644 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I wouldn't doubt it's a great fighter. Russia is up to it's shoulders in domestic aerospace engineering history and experience. True their methods have been risky or ambitious to a fault, but just because they learn the hard way, it doesn't mean they didn't learn or get a pay off in the future 👩‍🔧🇺🇲🛠️🇷🇺

  • @Hiiamsamm
    @Hiiamsamm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This looks like some cheap ride at universal studios

    • @flynnrider7185
      @flynnrider7185 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don’t insult Universal

    • @sdfplanespotting
      @sdfplanespotting 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@flynnrider7185 I know I was just kidding I’ve been there once and I was supposed to got this year too it’s great

  • @gregjohnson2920
    @gregjohnson2920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It’s amazing how Russia’s new and latest technology always looks like our old obsolete stuff

    • @FedericoLucchi
      @FedericoLucchi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's amazing how your old obsolete stuff still is in service and works better than your overpriced and unreliable "high-tech" stuff.

  • @romyrakis4838
    @romyrakis4838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im just waiting for Pierre Sprey to call this one a Turkey too so we get some parity across the board about stealth jets😂

  • @mattyice2099
    @mattyice2099 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lol they are 10 years late and nothing can touch the F-35 in versatility.

  • @nonamegame9857
    @nonamegame9857 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The finest new fighter that Russian Bitcoin can provide 🙄.

  • @philliplopez8745
    @philliplopez8745 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    It was a foam and plywood mock up . Pure theater . A potemkin village with wings .

    • @frankrenda2519
      @frankrenda2519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      what do you know rondo

    • @Neil00841
      @Neil00841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is the prototype, not a mockup.

    • @Levrai10
      @Levrai10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @jpslayermayor9293
      @jpslayermayor9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But Phil, the news guy said it has real glass display panels! Plus it has these (reporter makes flipper movements with his hand ).

  • @PopcornNSodaProductions
    @PopcornNSodaProductions ปีที่แล้ว

    They saw the X-32 and did that can I copy your homework meme

  • @mrandrossguy9871
    @mrandrossguy9871 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you imagine the X-29 as the Thunderbirds !?

  • @bendershome4discountorphan859
    @bendershome4discountorphan859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We've got a counter to f35 skunkworks son of sr71...hold my beer

  • @mr.pontifex7595
    @mr.pontifex7595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So, exactly when has the f35 not been a disappointment?

    • @maxhanes1073
      @maxhanes1073 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      S400 haven't been able to take any down yet so...even though they claim they can see them. Tracking and shooting down are clearly not possible seems how Israel flys over s400 a bunch of times and never shot down

    • @_flyingcat_7527
      @_flyingcat_7527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you expected an export fighter to be better than the f-22 then of course you would be disappointed. The f-35 does its job well

    • @abram730
      @abram730 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@maxhanes1073 The radars that can see them are not tracking radars. You'd need a 2 stage SAM with an active second stage that can get updated position and a multi-band launcher updating the missile as it gets tracking. You are only going to have a general intercept point but could get tracking before terminal second stage. The USA is developing 2 stage air intercept missile that could work for that. S400 will have a lot of dead weight and would be hard to maneuver so late in the flight. Israel was out in front on a secondary seeker head with their Stunner, although Russia has one.

  • @elAJpr
    @elAJpr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can sit on the cockpit, but I can't show it to you", while in the background a full cockpit presentation.

  • @michaelg8642
    @michaelg8642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i mean you know a plane is good when they use 3d projection mapping on it in the showroom to make it look futuristic

  • @carlstockmal
    @carlstockmal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That news chick looking completely overwhelmed by the math problem was priceless! How do you add 35 + 22 in your head like that?

    • @floridahomesforsale4417
      @floridahomesforsale4417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      She wasn’t overwhelmed, she was underwhelmed because she didn’t care about the story.

    • @ramongonzalez2112
      @ramongonzalez2112 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The pink satin sleeveless blouse 👚 got me.😆Today’s “reporters “ bizarre.

  • @stupendouslife8128
    @stupendouslife8128 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    We will talk about it when it will be in production, for now it is just a prototype, if Russia developed it in 1 year it is a checkmate to our long, very long time development of F-35, also we will see the cost of it in Russia versus the astronomical cost to American taxpayers of F-35.

    • @hairypoppins2292
      @hairypoppins2292 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let's talk about that snorkel in Michelle Obamas thong

    • @StrangerHappened
      @StrangerHappened 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This new plane is not a prototype but the exact exemplar that will fly in two years. Russia has been years late with Su-57 but this new one will fly much sooner since it is based on Su-57 since most equipment is ready by now.

    • @amateur9626
      @amateur9626 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But I don’t understand why you got so excited? Is someone forcing you to buy this plane? If you are sure that this is a piece of plywood and not a competitor to your superplane, why is there so much noise in the comments about it? The Russians showed their goods to potential buyers, what do you care about that?

    • @yoboyshane.9579
      @yoboyshane.9579 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amateur9626 cool tho?

  • @zekefrancislutz278
    @zekefrancislutz278 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mom I want F-35
    Mom: we have f-35 at home
    F-35 at home: …..

  • @robertm3329
    @robertm3329 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Yea you can have my homework just change it up a bit"

  • @terminald7064
    @terminald7064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What a sweet reporting gig. Bet the food was awesome too.

    • @FedericoLucchi
      @FedericoLucchi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The MSM isn't even trying anymore. Time to stop watching their cheap BS

    • @terminald7064
      @terminald7064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @omonil Biff what I’m talking about, is that if you were a reporter, this would be a cool day on the job, and with the high value items on display, there is probably some excellent cuisine on site at well. Now sure how that wasn’t clear.

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    SU75 Just by number 75-57 is a single engine Su57,same engine and avionics Just adjusted to a single engine!

  • @fergrt01
    @fergrt01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    The fact that this aircraft's nickname is in English says a lot about the true dynamics at play here between these two countries. One is a successful, disinterested superior, the other is constantly and slightly desperately trying to keep up.

    • @calgoman3120
      @calgoman3120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Which country is which I don’t understand

    • @ipant1056
      @ipant1056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@calgoman3120 America is the superior and Russia is trying to keep up, that's why their trying to keep up with our f22 and f35

    • @swox3669
      @swox3669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ipant1056 america is anything but superior

    • @RainingFlow19
      @RainingFlow19 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gen Vuelham russia and other NATO nations also developing their own 6th gen fighter. Russia probably getting money from India and China as usual.

    • @user-dr8xv5wu4s
      @user-dr8xv5wu4s 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RainingFlow19 ? What do you mean “as usual”? America is a great friend of India and China. After all Americans helped China to restore its economy and deeds speak louder than words.

  • @LaikaTheG
    @LaikaTheG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow it truly is ahead of it’s time! It has an apu and goes twice the speed of light! Truly amazing aircraft. Wow! It even uses no elevator similar to skyway from 1956! Just truly ahead of its time! It was even rushed in production and probably will never be used similar to the Felon and most likely it’s poorly built! Just icing on the cake!

    • @James-kp8mg
      @James-kp8mg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I don't know about poorly designed. American planes require pretty much perfect runways. Russian planes use just about any runways and don't need it to be constantly cleared.
      But that is why Checkmate is such a great name. It's a troll on America because getting this to others in large enough numbers will bankrupt America. Our need to interfere means we'll be facing groups of formerly oppressed nations grouping together but now armed with S3-400 and these. Whole regions of the world will quickly become off limits to American airpower and we'll need to go in on foot. We're 4% of the population, we won't last door to door. Putin is incredibly smart. We can't overthrow governments around Russia fast enough to prevent this from killing us first. We wouldn't simply leave Russia alone. Don't poke a bear.

    • @daisukekazumi2399
      @daisukekazumi2399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@James-kp8mg Not exactly, this new plan is about 10 or so years late. America's probably making better technology, but hey lets give congrats to the russians for trying I guess. Also they're not a bear, not so strong economy, military power, etc.

    • @James-kp8mg
      @James-kp8mg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@daisukekazumi2399 You're not looking at the big picture. If these planes can be bought cheaply, and why not considering there's no American lobbyists, congressman or executives driving up cost, small countries will be able to afford a handful of these. If they work together they can finally rid themselves of American exploitation. We won't be able to just send a bunch of 4th generation planes in to control everyone. Along with S400 and 300 missile systems that I'm sure can see our stealth technology we won't be able to dictate to as many countries. And America's strength is it's ability to exploit smaller countries. You're a believer in the lie that America is so far ahead of Russia. We're not. Armada is a better tank, they just need numbers. But given the range of their gun they'll hit three Abrams before they get into range. And while Abrams has a heat signature Armada doesn't have much of one. Hitting it from the air will be hard. F35 is usually broken down. And if S300 can see much smaller and stealthier drones than S400 can definitely see F35 and 22. Don't fool yourself into believing otherwise. It's common sense. They can see our stealth planes. They also have hypersonic missiles while we don't but I'm sure you don't believe that's true either. They have subs NATO can't track. Which also carry hypersonic missiles. And they have Poseidon. If we keep messing with Russia they are going to show us that and we will regret it tremendously. Stop believing the American propaganda machine. We're a society on the verge of collapse because our people are uneducated and our politicians don't know when to stop.

    • @milanprica5027
      @milanprica5027 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@James-kp8mg great analysis. Russia defiantly not weak and showing that in Ukraine. Fighting proxy army of NATO in Ukraine winning big time. 7 weeks war 23000 plus dead Ukrainian army personnel. If Russia was weak as mainstream western media claim they would have attacked Russia already.

    • @armedfarm3429
      @armedfarm3429 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@James-kp8mg You should get a job at PMSNBC you could be Russias new weapons expert floor sales person reporter. You're very impressive with you're drivel and swill foaming from your face!
      Mudder Ruskia is greattest contrie on earTh!

  • @bpp325
    @bpp325 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Not only is it a competitor...it IS the F35 purchased directly from our inventory.

    • @808G8GT
      @808G8GT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ar first I thought the same thing....but it has no Rear stabilizers/ elevators.

  • @michaeltawiah1851
    @michaeltawiah1851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Russian journalist won't be allowed if this was held in the US.

    • @jamestalbot1647
      @jamestalbot1647 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So?

    • @bobo2422
      @bobo2422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      So? He's saying big ol USA land of the free is less lenient towards foreign media than Russia. Very ironic considering Russia's tendencies.

    • @_flyingcat_7527
      @_flyingcat_7527 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobo2422 the difference is the US didnt want any secrets being given to rival nations while russia just wants to sell as many of these as possible

    • @yawappiah8498
      @yawappiah8498 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because Americans always fear them

    • @jpslayermayor9293
      @jpslayermayor9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah the Russians are the most open and honest country in the world. We should emulate them. I think thats what number 45 actually was attempting to do, but was incompetent at that as well

  • @rcipsrcips1208
    @rcipsrcips1208 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Making an aircraft that looks like an F35 copy does not necessarily equal competition.

  • @cancerfighter0074
    @cancerfighter0074 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is it now

  • @JohnnyAngel8
    @JohnnyAngel8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Oh, this is the fighter jet that Fox News said flies at more than 2X the speed of ... LIGHT!
    LOL! True story.

    • @amishhackerlul3731
      @amishhackerlul3731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No this is the plane that crashed CNN news ratings.

    • @sir_dragonfly7287
      @sir_dragonfly7287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Funny that Republicans would support the Russian government, I guess it's mutual now.

    • @_flyingcat_7527
      @_flyingcat_7527 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True story i swear guys just believe me i promise they said that

  • @ChrisFlynnSurfer
    @ChrisFlynnSurfer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why don’t they unveil the uap that can defy physics

    • @martyconroy3786
      @martyconroy3786 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because they want you to believe in aliens.

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because that’s the US govs. And if they unveil that… think about the implications… that thing could stop any nuclear missile attack… destroy an entire navy with ease. It would cause international arms race/conflict.

    • @_flyingcat_7527
      @_flyingcat_7527 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If they have something like that why would they let people know it exists?

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_flyingcat_7527 because then everyone would try to steal it… it would become an international distaster. A new arms race.

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_flyingcat_7527 the US military is already so far ahead in terms of technology and power. There’s no point in releasing that to the public. Just save it for a real conflict.

  • @rubikscuber4971
    @rubikscuber4971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does this sound like a Marques Brownlee car review lol

    • @scoopdypoopty3200
      @scoopdypoopty3200 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah it sounds like a journalist reviewing a plane

  • @crusaderclarkplays5466
    @crusaderclarkplays5466 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jet VTOL is more amazing because it may use in rough terrain territory or space station and outpost for resupply.

  • @TheOkieLife
    @TheOkieLife 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Oh no. Another Russian prototype... scary. 😉
    Theoretically the US could build the Millennium Falcon for Space Force... if we're gonna play the prototype game.

    • @proconsuls8458
      @proconsuls8458 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah, prototype... you cannot even imagine how difficult to find few good microchips on Alibaba!

    • @TheOkieLife
      @TheOkieLife 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@proconsuls8458 lmfao so true.

  • @AudioAndroid
    @AudioAndroid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Russia, missed opportunity, they should of unveiled a large "White Tic Tac" shaped craft and took no questions.

  • @ricky6608
    @ricky6608 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It kinda has MiG-15/Sabre vibes being built around an engine

  • @ENGLISHISBEST
    @ENGLISHISBEST 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Lovely mock up, light show & smoke. Actions speak louder than mock ups.

    • @FedericoLucchi
      @FedericoLucchi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup. The very description of the F-35! Lots of bells and whistles to make the fans wet, but no actual battlefield abilities.

  • @alexanderthomas9458
    @alexanderthomas9458 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Looks like the other competitors prototype for the joint strike fighter program back in the Very beginning

    • @StrangerHappened
      @StrangerHappened 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nothing like those fat ugly cows from the past. And the rear design is truly amazing. Like from Stars Wars.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It looks kinda similar but that doesnt mean its copy in any regards

  • @sensualeye
    @sensualeye 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Stealth is a gimmick that works best under ideal conditions. The real factors are avionics and counter measures imo.

  • @sanpark4127
    @sanpark4127 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your info

  • @malachaiuys711
    @malachaiuys711 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pricetag lol?
    (Like I can even afford one😂)

  • @WaxPaper
    @WaxPaper 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Everybody always references the F35 as the pinnacle of US aircraft, but isn't the F22 actually even more dangerous and advanced? The way I understood it, the F35s were like a budget version of the F22s, and the F22s are supposed to be the one aircraft we won't share, because they're so good.

    • @MrRydoone
      @MrRydoone ปีที่แล้ว

      American jet just good on media not in real war ..

    • @WaxPaper
      @WaxPaper ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrRydoone What makes you say that?

    • @MrRydoone
      @MrRydoone ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WaxPaper for example stealth bomber..in media.. undetected..stealth , unbeatable but got shot down by Soviet SAM 40's version..nobody know until the real war ..but in media American built-in always champion in media

    • @kalidilerious
      @kalidilerious ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@MrRydooneWhere is this record of a stealth b-2 bomber being shot down? The B-2 bomber has a perfect combat record. I think your confused with the one f114 being shot down?

    • @MrRydoone
      @MrRydoone ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kalidilerious it's was shot down by Serb in Yugoslavia

  • @Omega-lj1nw
    @Omega-lj1nw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The F-35 has been a proven aircraft and used in missions. Russia has yet to test this aircraft in actual combat missions.

    • @krich8138
      @krich8138 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope

    • @tube4545
      @tube4545 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It has made to prove you. Don't doubt that they have already the technology which has been proven other jets so RUSSIAN equipment has proven on the ground by NATO in Ukraine. Russia resist alone all NATO nations weapons.

  • @randomentertainingvideos3545
    @randomentertainingvideos3545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Older 6th gen Russian fighters look so fifth gen with the pointed tip, the wing design and twin circular exhaust. Reminds me of the f-15, But this is nice.

  • @somehecucunt3194
    @somehecucunt3194 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:50 The YF-23 Black widow II has the same setup

  • @PANOSDX1968
    @PANOSDX1968 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So in other words the F-35 fighter had it's first official flight in 2004. The Russians with this SU-75 are admitting that they are 17 years behind in development of their F-35 competitor. That is SAD!!!! But believe me, this design is more like the F-16 Block-75 Viper dual cockpit, single engine, with hidden weaponry. We are updating as we speak our allies old f-16's that are on service for 40+ years and still dominate. This may not be able to compete with the French Rafale. The SU-57 feels stealthier and deadlier to an experienced eye. Maybe it's designed for Pakistan, Brasil and Myanmar or Turkey now that they are thrown out if the F-35 program for using it in Tajikistan and Turkmenistan...lol.

    • @amateur9626
      @amateur9626 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who is dominated by your F-16s and F-35s? Dominating an imaginary adversary in Hollywood films?

  • @nicholasxayasith55
    @nicholasxayasith55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Cool. Will they launch it off of that steam-powered chunk of crap they call an aircraft carrier, and have judges hold up score card numbers as it pirroettes into the ocean?

    • @FedericoLucchi
      @FedericoLucchi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...maybe just sell it as overpriced piece of junk, and then every nation that signed on to the project would back off... like for the F-35

  • @stevenrobertson9583
    @stevenrobertson9583 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks a lot like the X-32 and a blend of the F-35 and the Kingfish 😂

  • @wvt5825
    @wvt5825 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe the YF23 lacked the rear stabilizers as well

  • @flynnrider7185
    @flynnrider7185 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    New concept Russian fighter jet, taking orders and prepayment for production. Good luck on delivery.

    • @temich1985
      @temich1985 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      pull system is more efficient for such a high-tech item. for example if you want to buy a Tesla car, you have to preorder as well.

  • @thelegendaryblackbeastofar39
    @thelegendaryblackbeastofar39 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The rear engine nozzle looks pretty conventional, just like on the F-35. It would seem the designers chose not to pursue a low IR signature design such as that of the F-22 which uses rectangular nozzles. Since the large metal turbines are directly exposed via straight line-of-sight this implies that this aircraft (much like the F-35) would have significantly impaired radar stealth from directly behind.
    It would seem that both the US and Russian designers have come to the conclusion that omitting these 5th generation features is a good trade off for the added design issues of the rectangular F22-style, low-IR, low radar-visibility jet nozzles.

    • @geraldgoing
      @geraldgoing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It has total thrust vectoring.

    • @asatechnics8363
      @asatechnics8363 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they choosed that nozzle over a rectangular one so that they could keep the 3d thrust vectoring .... the thrust vector in the f-22 moves up and down left and right ..... not 3D .... russians really love there maneuverability in there jets ,one of the reasons i love russian jets ,they move like UFO's

  • @dyvel
    @dyvel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If it's mainly targeted as export, how secure will it really be?

  • @mitchrichards1532
    @mitchrichards1532 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I hope they do sell it, these things are all so expensive that no one will want to actually risk using them in a war. Brilliant!

    • @robertlangley687
      @robertlangley687 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If I had plenty of pie mash I would buy one has a private jet and fly it.

  • @hakinadedeji
    @hakinadedeji 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones,” Einstein said

    • @phillipkalaveras1725
      @phillipkalaveras1725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      WWIII was fought in cyberspace and the West lost Nov. 03, 2020

    • @hakinadedeji
      @hakinadedeji 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@phillipkalaveras1725 Nope, cyberspace is just a tiny tip of the iceberg of what is to come in WWIII that will be fought with everything... land, air, sea, space, cyberspace, dirty war, guerrilla war, assymetric and symmetric...name it... and hence... WW IV will be fought with sticks and stone. I can only hope that will be in the year 3021... but considering that WWII was fought just over 70 years ago... i can only be afraid

  • @1LORENZOUTUBE
    @1LORENZOUTUBE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It looks cool. That’s all it is, cool looking.

    • @cr-cn4ky
      @cr-cn4ky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah?...how about the aerodynamic surfaces?...doesn't it make you ask yourself:"hmmm with this type of aero design and the lack of elevators on the tail,I wonder what they're using to compensate for the elevators,surely the vectoring nozzle in the back?...I wonder what the performance on this beast is?...how much lift to drag percentage can the engine produce?"
      Yeah just cool looking.

    • @Mc__Nugget
      @Mc__Nugget 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cr-cn4ky rUsSiA nUmbEr oNe

  • @DaxL_net
    @DaxL_net 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With heavy usage of ai on everything, these fighters might become obsolete due to that pace of using superfast weapons. By the time you start war it has finished due to the speed and sheer power the weapon possess.

  • @roflocopter1337
    @roflocopter1337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if it has elevons since it lacks traditional elevators.

  • @Chimpyboi
    @Chimpyboi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Eh, it doesn't look like it'll have the maneuvering characteristics of an F22 or even an F35.

  • @aviation4life640
    @aviation4life640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It’s not as stealth as they say. Look at the rear of the engine, it’s not streamlined or “stealthed” like the F-22.

    • @liamroach8451
      @liamroach8451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Ok youtube engineer . Whatever you say

    • @aviation4life640
      @aviation4life640 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@liamroach8451, it’s common knowledge bud

    • @liamroach8451
      @liamroach8451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@aviation4life640 it's common knowledge that americans are blinded by the flag to a point that you think you the best in everything . Well hopefully one day you'll wake the f up

    • @aviation4life640
      @aviation4life640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@liamroach8451, lol you have no idea what you’re talking about 😂. Su-75 = 🗑

    • @aviation4life640
      @aviation4life640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@liamroach8451, You’re not a expert in this so idk wtf you’re talking about.

  • @erickohlhorst747
    @erickohlhorst747 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, as far as size goes I was wondering how much larger the Russian fighter is compared to Iran's Qahar-313, looks like the cockpit is slightly larger. perhaps fit a full grown pilot?

  • @TNTNT20
    @TNTNT20 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does it have vertical take off?