#RailNatter

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @anoniaino
    @anoniaino 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would wholeheartedly agree that the Irish mail route would be the best.
    First of all, it’s probably the closest to a straight line between Dublin and London.
    Secondly, you can route trains onto both HS2 and NPR, and with a connection between HS1 and HS2 in London you could run Dublin to Paris trains.
    The LNWR actually had a station in Dublin called North Wall, which the ferry from Holyhead would serve, and you could get a train from there onto the rest of the rail network.
    I don’t think the Tuskar route is that useful, because it’s so far south in both countries. Wexford also isn’t a very highly populated area. Rosslare Port is probably best to be left for ferries directly to France.

  • @philh1462
    @philh1462 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The Irish Mail route would probably actually make the Dublin/Liverpool/Mcr/Leeds/Hull corridor a proper economic challenger to that London.

    • @GustavSvard
      @GustavSvard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      HS3 going all the way to Dublin? Not a bad idea. With Services going Dublin-Liverpool-London as well, of course. And some of those also extending to Belfast if/when the rail gauge up to Belfast is changed to Standard. Sure, might not be the easiest crossing to build, but would be very useful.

  • @dasy2k1
    @dasy2k1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    If you want to cut London - Dublin flights then the Tuskar or Irish mail routes are by far the best.
    If anything building both the Tuskar and Galloway routes then linking them up with an Irish high speed route would be even better

    • @TheHaighus
      @TheHaighus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like this idea. I suspect Ireland would want a east coast high speed line from Cork to Belfast anyway, so linking (more or less) either end to Glasgow and Cardiff would be sensible.
      The Irish Mail route would probably make sense as a later-built third crossing connecting a corridor leading to Merseyside, Manchester, Leeds. Could even be an extension of HS3 (if that hadn't been cancelled...).
      Edited to correct to east coast.

  • @adodgygeeza
    @adodgygeeza ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Belfast rule is silly, if you are being fsir you should add a Dublin connection to the Northern Routes

  • @GuyDawson
    @GuyDawson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Would this be a case of the English paying for a rail link between an independent Scotland and a unified Ireland?

    • @GarethDennisTV
      @GarethDennisTV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Now that would be nice!

    • @Loomx5
      @Loomx5 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Were a Unified Ireland and Scotland to be in the EU, it might make economic sense for them (and the EU) to fund it themselves. Would provide a solid link between the Common Market.

  • @TheHaighus
    @TheHaighus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a case to be made to build a crossing with segregated freight and passenger lines (so 4 lines, two each way in total) to increase capacity? A rail freight link with Ireland would be the most efficient and environmentally friendly way to move most goods, so the capacity should be maximised. Obviously the cost would be higher, but it kind of "future proofs" the design as demand increases.

  • @EmyrDerfel
    @EmyrDerfel ปีที่แล้ว

    29:20 second from right looks like Nick "The Chieftain" Moran.

  • @doorhanger9317
    @doorhanger9317 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kintore's own website claims the name is etymologically Gaelic. That whole area was part of the Pictish bits that got integrated into Gaelic culture, before the Gaelic kingdom pushed south and got Anglianised from the inside.

  • @thehaprust6312
    @thehaprust6312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This all begs the questions of bathymetric and geotechnical analyses of the potential route.

  • @TANGARASandOSCARS
    @TANGARASandOSCARS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You should really just timetable railnatter for 90 minutes.

  • @timballam3675
    @timballam3675 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tuskar would require upgrades around the east of Bristol....

  • @matthewchamberlain391
    @matthewchamberlain391 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought the Bosporus rail tunnel in Istanbul was now the longest underwater tunnel in the world?

    • @ApemanMonkey
      @ApemanMonkey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What did you base this thought on?

    • @matthewchamberlain391
      @matthewchamberlain391 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ApemanMonkey I saw it on a program and thought I would point that out because this video states that the channel tunnel is the longest underwater tunnel in the world. That is no longer the case.

    • @ApemanMonkey
      @ApemanMonkey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matthewchamberlain391 you said you aren't sure, though. Can you link to a source?

    • @matthewchamberlain391
      @matthewchamberlain391 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ApemanMonkey Sorry, I was mistaken, channel tunnel is still the longest. This tunnel will overtake it - www.theb1m.com/video/progress-on-worlds-deepest-and-longest-undersea-tunnel

    • @mreogromsdal415
      @mreogromsdal415 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@matthewchamberlain391 actuallly no. its going to be the longest ROAD tunnel. its about half the length of the channel tunnel