Why Reactive Power is Necessary ? | The Best Explanation | What is Reactive Power ?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 78

  • @sakthivelnathan8525
    @sakthivelnathan8525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Extremely useful. These simple facts are never written in any textbook in a simple manner as you explained in this video. I did study numerous books, but this 9 mints video made me clear. Thanks a lot for your service in disseminating your knowledge.

  • @jarrydnii9993
    @jarrydnii9993 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also, reactive power is useful for induction generators that do not have an external excitation system like sync. generators. The presence of Q in the rotor and stator windings provides a magnetizing current that establishes the rotating magnetic field in the rotor. That rotating magnetic field cuts the stator coils, which induces a voltage (electromagnetic induction), that results in current flowing in the stator coils. The stator is connected to the grid so this product of current and voltage is the power delivered into the grid.

  • @HeavyMetalPianoChnl
    @HeavyMetalPianoChnl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you very much! I am trying to understand why, when I run a load flow simulation, the bus voltages are less than nominal without reactive power compensation and then why adding compensation props them back up. This was very useful!

  • @JohnWilliams-qu8nr
    @JohnWilliams-qu8nr ปีที่แล้ว

    I now understand that there is leading AND lagging reactive power. This use to confuse me. Great video and explanations- thank you!!

  • @chrishadjipetris6059
    @chrishadjipetris6059 ปีที่แล้ว

    Before watching this video, I know is useful for voltage control. You can control voltage by varying active or reactive power. However, active power is what consumers pay for, hence we choose to control voltage with reactive power. Another important fact is that you can use reactive power either for power factor compensation, or voltage control, but not for both

  • @ajaiasokan4183
    @ajaiasokan4183 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How reactive power produces magnetic field

  • @peterbenko___
    @peterbenko___ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey! Thank you for this video. Subscribed.

  • @mustaphatijjanimuhammad4672
    @mustaphatijjanimuhammad4672 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You get a new subscriber. ❤

  • @santiospina4504
    @santiospina4504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Finally a satisfactory explanation of this topic!!! Thank you very much :)

  • @sweetyturiya7449
    @sweetyturiya7449 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well explained.pls make videos on more topics. If possible try to make videos on basic components of electrical engineering. We go through books, we get the things but practically how it works that we don't know. You have made it clear wid the help of presentation. Thanx alot..

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good

  • @leonardojacometti9883
    @leonardojacometti9883 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @tasnimsarker4653
    @tasnimsarker4653 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please, make video on induction generator working principle.

  • @pythonshorts4945
    @pythonshorts4945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful explanation

  • @EnergySeeker
    @EnergySeeker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is it possible to convert the reactive power to real power and if yes how ?

    • @ovidius2000
      @ovidius2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      motor,ThenGenerator.

    • @AayushPatel-gc3fw
      @AayushPatel-gc3fw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it is not.. reactive power is also known as imaginary power.

  • @mdaadilhaque3030
    @mdaadilhaque3030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nicely explained..

    • @buildfrombasics3124
      @buildfrombasics3124  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks,Aadil. Have you watched other videos in our channel,? We appreciate your feedback.

  • @arunpaul5718
    @arunpaul5718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How does dc motor field gets energized since supply is dc voltage and thereby no reactive power????

    • @insearchofpeace2151
      @insearchofpeace2151 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For any dc motor, if you model the field winding, then there is a winding resistance and an inductor which models the coil which produces the magnetic field. When a DC power source is connected to the field, think of DC power source and the winding as an RL circuit. Active power is I^2*R, and reactive power which is now converted as magnetic field is given by 0.5*L*I^2. I think this the formula. Active Power and Reactive Power are basically AC concepts. Applying them to DC is technically not correct. But this is an explanation based on those lines.

    • @onfreetime
      @onfreetime 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A current carrying conductor produces magnetic field around it. I think Reactive power is not needed to produce field.

    • @onfreetime
      @onfreetime 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@insearchofpeace2151 It's not the coil that produces magnetic field. Any conductor which carries current produces field.

  • @chandanachowdary6727
    @chandanachowdary6727 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir,Actually it's a final viva question to me in my B.tech final project. I answered to this question briefly but here I got full information.thank u so much😊😍

  • @syedasad4436
    @syedasad4436 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well explained and thanks

  • @nujalcordo9924
    @nujalcordo9924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What happen to the grid if supply more reactive poWer?

    • @jarrydnii9993
      @jarrydnii9993 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you overcompensate reactive power locally by using FACTS devices or shunt capacitors in a transmission or distribution system, it does the same effect as the (Ferranti effect), so to speak, where voltage can increase beyond grid code requirement (voltage instability). If from the generation side, where a synchronous generator is overexcited (i.e., injection of reactive power into the grid), it can cause overloading of lines or transformers because P & Q can compete to flow in a specified line (with limited line flow limits), which can largely reduce efficiency. That is why the power factor is usually monitored to understand the P-Q ratio. The flow of a large amount of Q will incur more reactive losses thus, results in voltage drops. You will realize here that I said earlier the injection of Q increases voltage, and now, I'm saying the flow of Q reduces voltage. YES! That is because Q is usually compensated locally and is not allowed to flow in the grid, although a minimal amount can flow as injected by synchronous generators - that means the exact amount of Q required must be compensated or provided locally to avoid overloading or voltage issues. Generally, in power systems, we can't say one thing that can be seen as a fixed solution, but it changes depending on the application.

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:15 Basic question??? Perhaps for you it is, but not for many of your viewers. It doesn't sound very sympathetic to me.

  • @BabarAli-ve5uf
    @BabarAli-ve5uf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Helpful..
    Thank you

  • @MrVijayan55
    @MrVijayan55 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want ppt for this subject

  • @tasnimsarker4653
    @tasnimsarker4653 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well explained.😀

  • @veedapusiddhartha4895
    @veedapusiddhartha4895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Upload more videos sir

  • @bulentatalay9400
    @bulentatalay9400 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Reactive power is imaginary. And imaginary power is useful only in simplfying the calculations.
    Trying to understand what reactive power is same as trying to understand what sqrt(-1) is.

    • @buildfrombasics3124
      @buildfrombasics3124  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch this video fully

    • @ohgoditsjames94
      @ohgoditsjames94 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Imaginary" doesn't literally mean that it doesn't exist, it means it is a vector quantity, having a magnitude that exists in a time domain. If inductive or capacitive reactance was "imaginary" then we wouldn't have to compensate for it.

  • @learnbyshiva725
    @learnbyshiva725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks sir

  • @arun4846
    @arun4846 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍

  • @surajphunde1111
    @surajphunde1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir 🙏😊

    • @jayalaxmiakasani4653
      @jayalaxmiakasani4653 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you sir your explanation from basics are very good

  • @vikasbansal4180
    @vikasbansal4180 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks

  • @Nur_Md._Mohiuddin_Chy._Toha
    @Nur_Md._Mohiuddin_Chy._Toha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍👍👍👍👍👍😄😄

  • @rangaswamygoda8010
    @rangaswamygoda8010 ปีที่แล้ว

    PPT sir yes

  • @anilprajapati3261
    @anilprajapati3261 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pl correct spelling of field

  • @philiptamasese1559
    @philiptamasese1559 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes

  • @gyaneshwarsingh1273
    @gyaneshwarsingh1273 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please send

  • @davilkhan8181
    @davilkhan8181 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too bad explanation...
    I haven't seen this kind of worse explanation