I own this car and love it. I comparison shopped it against most of the competitors in the segment. The CR-V, with more cargo space, might be a better choice for a family. I chose the Mazda because I liked the luxury-like interior and the handling. The interior is now significantly quieter than past models. In addition, I found the Bose sound system in the GT trim is far superior to the sound system in the CR-V. I admired the ingenious configurable rear cargo space of the Nissan Rogue, as well as its incredibly comfortable seats, but the acceleration was a deal breaker -- it's totally inadequate. The Mazda is better, but its relatively pokey acceleration (much better than the Rogue, to be sure) is the one aspect of the car that I most wish were improved. Finally, I like the heads-up display in the Premium option package. I think it's an invaluable safety enhancement.
Only crossover I would consider! I am a wagon man, but compared to other SUVs this one is just gorgeous! Definitely one of my favorite Japanese SUV designs out there.
Great review. I had rented a diesel CX-5 in Japan 2 months ago and was absolutely shocked to see how refined and quiet it was. It is by far the quietest and most hushed unit both inside and outside the cabin among all brands (Germans included). Volkswagen may have tainted the image of diesel cars with the diesel gate, however, as shown by Mazda, the fuel is not to blame for but the lousy, sneaky corporatism. Another engineering milestone and winner from Mazda.
Nice review. I bought a cx-9. I love it. Not sure why more people arent going towards mazda. The sedans are georgeous and their line of suv/crossover is sick.
Just got ours 2 days ago. Frickin love it! We fell in love with the interior and softer ride. Test drove Rav-4 and CR-V and never gave Mazda a thought until, on accident, we saw a side by side video comparing the CR-V vs. CX-5. First thing we noticed was the aggressive front end. It looks bad ass! We then had to go to the dealership and check it out for ourselves. The reviews on this site is pretty much spot on. We chose the CX-5 mainly because of the interior and softer and quieter ride than the others in its class. Of course the CR-V has more oomph, but the CX-5 power is good enough for us. It's not like we are planning on breaking any land speed records any time soon. As for as using the same engine. No problem. At least when I need to find parts, they'll be readily available because they have been using the same engine in a lot of their vehicles for a while now.
Actually, Mazda's new SkyactivX engine will use spark plug AND compression ignition, depending on engine load. This is what makes it unique from other HCCI attempts in the past. They just recently had a journalist testing event for that engine in Germany and all were impressed. It produces slightly more power than the 2.5 SkyactivG and improves fuel economy by a whopping 30 percent! Car and Driver noted some knocking in certain low RPM situations, but I suspect that will get worked out before production, which is slated to begin in 2019.
Another great review. I really like how thorough you are with your reviews, you touch on details others ignore but that may be important to a lot of buyers. Well done.
I can't choose between cx5 and forester XT! XT has the power I want but the cx5 has the interior I love! Which performs and handles the best but with the best luxury?
As always I like your reviews in any brand of cars specially this one. This car is gorgeous and as most people said it is fun to drive that's why I choose this one for myself to buy. I'm excited to drive it. I've been waiting for your review of this car for a very long time as it is always the most complete one.
As always, stellar review! The updated CX-5 should lead to even more consumers flocking into Mazda dealers. I was shocked when I heard the MPG ratings, though. The previous MX-5 offered pretty great fuel economy out of its SkyActiv Technology engine, but this updated one seems to leave a bit more desired in that area (maybe the increased weight, different tire choice, updated EPA rating scale, and the slightly updated engine tuning caused a slight drop)... 🤔 The exterior of this vehicle most definitely boasts a more poised and athletic stance over the taller previous model, though. Also, the interior is leagues ahead of many of its older competitors, as well. It just needs minor technological updates and it will be golden! 🌟🌟🌟 Overall, I feel like this update was a pleasent one for Mazda to conduct. Once Mazda offers that Diesel option, I feel like the CX-5 will be the 'complete' package for people looking for the best of both worlds in their Compact Utility Vehicle. From one car enthusiast to another, keep up the great work, Sofyan! 👍🏽
Bruce Solomon, Thank you so much for your comment, but as you know everyone has their own opinion. Honestly, I truly enjoy being as through as possible with my reviews, and likewise, in my comments.
why update when it works? mazda connect is easily the most intuitive and easy to use software on the market. thats like asking apple to change its its UI. mazda definitely goes with the mindset of "we will give you less but we make sure its the best"
Ordered a 2017 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring w/ Premium Package this week but grey (same package shown). It shipped from Japan and arrived to port in Seattle Monday. Now have to wait for it to come to Chicago by train. I cannot wait! Great Review btw. My brother purchased the competitor the 2017 Honda CR-V Touring. Sharp car as well.
Today is the big day! The dealership called and the new CX-5 is ready to be picked up. Hopefully I don't regret not purchasing another Acura / Honda in the long run of 5 years.
Thanks for being the only reviewer for pointing out the coarse and intrusive engine noise. I thought I would love this car but the engine noise was so loud and under powered. Felt like I was driving an 80s econobox.
What the Mazda lacks in not having a turbo like the new cr-v it makes up for not having a CVT like the Honda, yea the Honda may have more features but the Mazda looks so much sexier and is much sportier
So comparing this to the Kia Sportage SX (turbo), which do you think is better? Also, looking for advice on choosing a new-ish mainstream SUV like this Mazda vs. a used Audi Q5/BMW x1. Thoughts?
The soft touch part of the dash is actually a type of leather and the wood is actually real Cenwood.....(this car is in every way as good as an entry level BMW....I crossed shop both and actually drove the CX5 to a BMW dealer and they were blown away by the quality of the interior)...So if you’re going to compare it a mid to upper level Beamer then of course there’s not much of a comparison (or is there😉), but it’s every bit as nice, if not nicer, than the entry level luxury cars that are often times 10k more...
Living in Scottsdale Arizona I experienced that during the hotter summer months the heads up display stops working during extreme temps. Mazda REALLY needs to look at correcting this (even if they have to go back to an imbedded display, or even one that goes up and down like audi...)
Sofyan if you were looking to drop your cash on a used SUV which one of these would you get Mazda CX-5, Honda CRV, Hyundai Tucson, Toyota RAV4? Could you list them in order and why. Thanks so much man good videos. Also I did have a chance to look at this CX5 and noticed the rubber around the door frame was the most loose I've seen in awhile
Blake Ewing question. Do you feel like the vehicle is underpowered? I know it's a family vehicle, but the engine just seems incredibly wimpy for the size of the car.
OpticObsidiaN you know, I can see how someone might say that depending on what they're used to driving. But, I haven't really had any complaints in that. I think a 2.0 turbo would be nice though.
I have a 2016 CX5. It has plenty of power for most people's needs around town and on the highway. The only time I've wished for more power is driving through N. GA mountains, loaded down with people and cargo. Its a great, fun to drive SUV.
Everyone is ripping on the engine, but I think the engine is on par with competitors' numbers on comparable engines. Ford's 2.5L puts out the same numbers, as does Jeep's 2.4L, although everyone wants to compare this to a turbo i4 or v6 option. Honestly, it's a fair assessment considering Mazda only has one engine option, but that is why they put all the energy into the transmission tuning. Could it use a turbo, sure! Mazda even admits that any engine will fit in any engine bay, so you could always drop a 2.5T in there and get almost double the power if you really wanted to. Good luck getting your hands on one, tho. While it's not gonna beat anyone in a drag race, I have zero complaints about acceleration because it FEELS like it's moving quicker than it really is, since the trans is so responsive. As a city driver, I think it's great. It's able to get out of its own way, can weave in and out of traffic, and provides a little bit of fun in a stop-n-go commute. On the weekends, I can take it out and play on the highway and still be able to open it up and enjoy it.
It's not the engine that is the issue it's the lack of an upgrade engine. While the 2.5 is sufficient for most consumers and on par with the competition, there will always be a fraction of buyers that want more power. So, it's kind of a missed opportunity for Mazda because some competitors offering an upgrade engine.
And people think that adding turbos will be the best option. www.carthrottle.com/post/engineering-explained-the-pros-and-cons-of-turbochargers-vs-superchargers/
Tired of hearing 'Hard to tell the difference between old CX5 and the new one'. Every single panel is different. The A-pillar is further back, the roofline is lower, the front end and side character lines are completely different. No the engine doesn't need updating, it was state of the art 5 years ago and most competitors have only just caught up to it's efficiency.
Been looking at this beautiful car since it came out and I reallllly want a grand touring. But my only concern is, is it quick from a stop? My 2010 Ford sport trac feels sluggish and I love that umph when you get pushed back in your seat. The only thing I wanna know is Can I get up and go with this car faster than my truck?
Honestly, right now? I would get the CR-V, until I drive the diesel CX-5 or wait for the SkyActiv-X engine, which is rumored to be supercharged. - Sofyan
IRL Zoom zoom gets shut down by the mom-mobile with more SUV practicality and efficiency... www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-v/2017/2017-honda-cr-v-vs-2017-mazda-cx-5-comparison-review/
Great review, you nailed all the good points and faults. The range launches in thailand in 2 months although maybe without the option of cream trim and possibly carries over the old diesel engine.
When buying a few years ago, I test drove about everything in this class, the CR-V, The Rav4, CX5, etc. I ended up wanted a little more size and power, so went with the Acura RDX, but I will say that the Mazda was easily my top choice amongst the rest, and I was surprised by that. Since, I've recommended it to several and all have been pleased with their purchase! The intangible is this... By far the most fun to drive!
C. Michael Rush i may just wait til 2019 for the next RDX, because all these SUVs leave me unsatisfied, and I dont wanna choose only between the Murano and Ford Edge.
@@ngoandrew8 Thank god! The Japanese model just came out and it's official. Can't wait to check it out! I was almost leaning towards the Honda edging it out for me, but if this new engine checks out screw Honda I'm going in on the sportier Mazda.
Good review but annoying the you keep wanting things updated that either work or are not that old - such as the key fob (2012), the Mazda connect head unit (2015) and the engines (introduced 2012). I am also surprised you cannot tell the first generation from the second. This one is much more stylish and premium. The six speed auto is fantastic and so what if it isn`t 8 speed, what matters is how well it works.
Excellent Review Sofyan! I'm impressed with how Mazda continues to deliver fantastic results with their vehicles on an overall scale, with the 2nd Gen CX-5 being no exception! Aside from the forth coming diesel engine offering, I do wish that the company would look into developing SkyActiv V6 Engines for at least one of their vehicles to be more competitive with the other automakers, while at the same time giving consumers more options to look at if they choose to buy a Mazda in a configuration like that. In addition, after testing both the redesigned Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5, which one do you like the best? - Michael
Between the CR-V and CX-5, we actually find the CR-V to be more appealing. We like its turbo engine and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Once Mazda updates that though, the needle will swing in the Mazda's favor.
Idk why but when he opened the 12V cover and struggled to cover back up I couldn't help but laugh cause when he shifted his body language said "Fuck this damn cover won't close back up" lol 😂
yet another great review. quick question. im looking into purchasing a 2017 explorer sport. i think it looks strong. but its a police car... do you recomend any other suv ?
We haven't driven the latest Explorer Sport but we did fall in love with the twin-turbo V6. The interior of the Ford could use some work and we also don't like how heavy and ponderous it feels on the road. We'd also recommend a Jeep Grand Cherokee, Mazda CX-9, and maybe even the new 2018 Traverse, though we haven't driven that one yet.
I test drove this vehicle a few times before. The car is amazing but desperately needs a more powerful engine. Mazda, just put the engine from CX-9 and cap it around 210HP and that would be fantastic.
Turbos aren't usually the best option. Reliable issues. www.carthrottle.com/post/engineering-explained-the-pros-and-cons-of-turbochargers-vs-superchargers/
Well how else are we supposed to squeeze more power without adding size and cylinders. CAFE is not being nice to any manufacturer anymore. Auto makers have no choice in this game to downsize and add turbos. This whole "Turbos are unreliable" is a crock of shit from Consumer Reports and you know it. Also an "article" from a biased and second party "reviewer" are about as reliable as their insight in this industry
Automakers are going to electric route anyway to get replace combustion engines. Hybrids and electric are the way to go sadly. With naturally aspirated engines reaching its limits, electric motors will be more common. Boosting more power and efficiency. More supercars are going to electric motors to gain more power. Also this article is from Engineering Explained. Unlike you with no knowledge he pointed out the pros and cons of turbos. Turbos have their problems and they aren't reliable like naturally aspirated engines and the maintenance cost will be expensive. Jason knows what he talking about.
Kellan Larson Oh yeah Mazda did say they were going to increase the compression ratio of their SkyActiv engines. Even Sofyan said it Mazda was going to that route. In case you missed that and didn't listen, 15:50.
Joshua Johnson Mazda did make a statement on hybridization. Mazda claims it will use hybrids but not within the cycles of the current model lineup. That is still several years away
Just replaced our 2 1/2 year old CX-5 with exactly the same (lease was up). Also liked the old rims better, the new design makes the wheels look smaller. Definitely more quiet and sharper but the retuned steering's weight is lighter than the old (which I preferred). Apple CarPlay and traffic on the NAV are necessary add ons.
Automatic has no clutch pedal, all top versions have an option for a sunroof, in Europe we can get it with revolution top. But this old system for a rear view camera is a let down imo.
Just my 2 cents, but I don't understand why reviewers continue to compare the CX-5 with CRV, Hyundai and RAV4. The CX5 is great looking SUV with a luxury/refined interior, while the other SUVs are UGLY and have plastic interiors. I keep hearing no power, limited off the line acceleration and no passing power, what? This is not a sports car, it's a comfortable, easy to drive, get around town SUV. Sometimes, I think reviewers watch other reviewers videos first and just regurgitate the same points. Take the Mazda badge off the CX5 and compare features, fit, finish and pricing to BMW X1/X3 and Audi A3 and I think you have a more reasonable comparison. I usually like Redline reviews, but this one is a miss! Btw, don't you have a Miata? I don't hear you talking about getting blown away off the line in your "sports car" , I'm just saying.
Agreed. Usually Sofyan provides balanced and insightful commentary but him saying this needs more power and in the same breath touts the CR-V (with its CVT) as a comparable and possibly better option for enthusiasts is confusing. Like you said, these are not sports cars - this is for carrying your family and sh*t around town but still having an enjoyable drive. How's that CVT drone in the CR-V?
As much as it annoys CX5 owners/lovers it is a generic compact SUV. Just like a RAV4, CR-V, Tuscon etc. Its not an Audi or Lexus competitor. Since we got that out the way I will admit the CX5 and the new CRV are the standouts in this class. And since people buy these not for their sporting pretension but for their practicality, the CRV wins. The marginally better driving dynamics cant out punch the CRV which is faster and more efficient and far more practical. Dont start on looks either, I think they both look dandy in their own way
It's in the same exact class as the CR-V, Hyundai, and RAV 4. Keep in mind you literally just talked about "looks" more than anything and you can't make fair points based on opinions instead of facts. Looks are subjective. Also, Mazda purposely advertises itself as a sportier model. It's not a sports car, because it's an SUV, but it's aiming to be a sportier SUV while still maintaining many of the practical functions you get out of a "SPORTS" utility vehicle (aka SUV). That first letter in "SUV" stands for sport and they are just leaning more towards the sports side of it. In fact, the 2019 model actually improved the engine so now you do get that punch and shows you exactly what they are aiming to do. The reason to get this car over the Honda CR-V, Toyota, Hyundai, etc is this is for the more sportier feel. From a ln actual objective standpoint (not subjective like looks) the Honda CR-V out performs this vehicle hands down in most categories. It even has faster acceleration with a CR-V transmission and more towing/torque. It also has more space which are key components of wanting a SUV to begin with. It has better MPG. Your only qualm is you think it looks worse which is debatable depending on whom you ask. Besides, looks alone aren't good enough when we're getting down to the nitty gritty. I disagree with your assertion. This is not a luxury vehicle. It is still in direct competition with those in its actual class. It may have a luxury feel, but that doesn't equate to being in the same class as a Alfa Romeo, Lexus, Porsche, etc. which would likely all have more than just the looks anyhow and stout better performance overall in many models. It's a step in a direction towards a more luxurious cabin, but you're overstepping boundaries to call it a full on luxury vehicle simply because you like the looks. It's a fine review and redline understands the audience and actual class this car is in direct competition with here. Can't wait for the 2019 model, because it literally does exactly what this review is harping on and shows how off you actually are here if you don't think Mazda is going for a sportier vehicle.
@@caseyfryback8271 Say what you want, but Mazda is going in the direction of making its models more sportier and packing a bigger punch overall. They are evolving into a more sportier model SUV and are marketing towards those types of people who may want a bit more of a sportier feel in their SPORTS utility vehicle. Doesn't have to be a full on sports car to have more of a sports feel similar dynamics. Don't believe me, go look at the new 2019 model of this car they just packed on a much more powerful turbo engine and upped the horsepower for a reason. If they truly didn't care about making the car a sportier model or letting you have more power there would be no reason to make it so. So I must say, you are off if you think requesting an upgrade that this Mazda has actually been moving towards and is now releasing was off. The upgrades starts to put it in range with the Forrester XT that is mentioned in this very video. Gotta pay attention to industry before commenting. Mazda has always been the type to lean towards sportier cars. There SUV's are no exception and thus it is perfectly in line to have requested and be in expectance of many of the things he mentioned. Especially since the newest model actually follows just that.
Loved my Fit sport MT, but decided to upgrade to a small suv for safety, space, and comfort. We heavily researched and test drove what you listed. Rav4 and Forrester is nice, but dated platform. Cx5 is slick sexy and feels fast, but IRL Zoom zoom gets shut down by the mom-mobile CRV with more SUV practicality and efficiency... www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-v/2017/2017-honda-cr-v-vs-2017-mazda-cx-5-comparison-review/
Yeah it does need an update. I own this and it doesn't even show album art for siruisxm. Hopefully it'll get much better when the apple car play update comes out in the next couple months
Safe styling? Every other vehicle in the class looks like either a deranged robot (CR-V) or an amorphous blob (Rogue). This is the only one with class, although the wheel wells are HUGE. The interior is also in a league of its own. My wife has a Grand Select in dark blue; it's fantastic.
Has anyone heard of paint issues with Mazda products? In my research, I am stumbling upon a lot of complaints from owners claiming the paint chips very easily.
So basically what you're saying with the latest update is it's slower, less economical, lower (less practical with ground clearance and interior space), and more expensive than the outgoing model year?
It's also more refined, quieter, has a better ride quality, a nicer cabin, and has more standard equipment to justify the price increase. Is it better than the 2016.5 model? Mostly, yes. Could Mazda make the 2017 even better? Of course.
I agree...However when compared to the CRV a vehicle that is around the same size and price but has a lot more room inside, has better gas mileage and is faster, I'd be hard pressed to choose the CX-5 over the it(these are Utility Vehicles first). Granted the Mazda is better looking, but surely it could be better looking without such a long nose robbing the Utility Vehicle of a lot of it's utility/space inside. I could live with just a little less space inside just like I could live with the CRV with just a little less driving dynamics. Doesn't Mazda know they are competing with the CRV? With all that being said, when the deisel comes out and it gets better gas mileage, and being real world faster with all that torque, not to mention less maintenance and probably longer lasting engine, I'd then take it over the CRV and live with the dramatic interior space difference in the same size package,
We test drove a 2018 CRV hoping to love it because it ticked all the other boxes for us. However, it had no character on the test drive and the CVT wasn't that good (compared to the Forester XT CVT which is the only acceptable one we had test driven). We picked up a CX5 last month and love it so far.
Mazda's new Skyactiv X engine is NOT stated to hit markets until 2019, debuting in the all-new 4th Generation Mazda 3, so its essentially two years away not months.
the cargo area was reduced from 65.4ft3 to 59.6ft3, now is heavier, reduced mpg by 5, still not android or Apple carplay, same motor, only +3hp, no turbo option, looks very similar than before... what was Mazda doing for this gen again?!
I don't think you mentioned that the CX-5 's new motor will be a diesel . That should give very good fuel economy . Hopefully it also gives a bit more power. And also yes , very good review. Redline is the one I prefer.
Mazda is asking a lot from their Skyactive 2.5L engine. It's in the Mazda3s, the Mazda6i, the CX-5. Depending on the weight of the vehicle. I will be either spot on (Mazda3s or feel a little under powered). The handling and overall fit and finish more than make up for the lack of acceleration.
It doesn't surprise me that this guy gets the information incorrect on the vehicles that he does reviews on that's because he doesn't really do the research on the vehicles he just says whatever he wants to and that's obvious
I personally prefer the previous design, the refresh does look sleeker with cleaner lines, but it lacks character that previous one has. When I bought my first Mazda which was 3 sedan, I became a big fan of their cars, I used to be a Honda fanboy, but not anymore, Mazda interior is simply the best, the ergonomics are really well laid out and designed with the driver in mind, it's so comfortable that I would not mind living inside the car if I had to. Mazda does lack the latest tech features, but if you need all that tech stuff to drive, you are not a good driver to begin with. While inline-4 engine from Mazda is adequate I do sometimes wish it had more high-end power when on the highway, I've floored the gas pedal on CX-5 once and I don't think it can go faster than 85 mph to be honest. If they put anything close to Honda's delicious V6 engine in there, it would be golden. I think the Mazda car that I own now will be my last gasoline powered car, I will be driving it for 3 to 4 more years, by that time, EV models will be widely offered by many car companies and I will probably get one of those and say good bye to gasoline car forever.
But the price is a down part for the top end trims . I know mazda is targeting against competitors like german brand entry models but they really need to improve a lot in everything.
![“อาร์ต พศุตม์” เกือบเอี่ยวทุกคดีดัง เอ๊ะไว้ก่อน ไม่มีอะไรได้มาง่ายๆ | แฉ 16 ต.ค. 67 [2/3] | GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0Gx-0-kUBv8/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.215 | พาเวล นเรศ - พูห์ กฤติน | 17 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IUzrjuf60P4/mqdefault.jpg)
I own this car and love it. I comparison shopped it against most of the competitors in the segment. The CR-V, with more cargo space, might be a better choice for a family. I chose the Mazda because I liked the luxury-like interior and the handling. The interior is now significantly quieter than past models. In addition, I found the Bose sound system in the GT trim is far superior to the sound system in the CR-V. I admired the ingenious configurable rear cargo space of the Nissan Rogue, as well as its incredibly comfortable seats, but the acceleration was a deal breaker -- it's totally inadequate. The Mazda is better, but its relatively pokey acceleration (much better than the Rogue, to be sure) is the one aspect of the car that I most wish were improved. Finally, I like the heads-up display in the Premium option package. I think it's an invaluable safety enhancement.
It's really good that Mazda is not going the CVT transmission Route CVT's suck
Only crossover I would consider! I am a wagon man, but compared to other SUVs this one is just gorgeous! Definitely one of my favorite Japanese SUV designs out there.
Oh my goodness where has this guy been all my life. Best review I ever watched. Total Mazda fan here.
That interior looks better than any acura or Infinity interior I've seen
Steven Cobo agreed
Steven Cobo
You have to be joking it's definitely not better than infinity!
Yea it's much better than both definitively
@@andre26261095 infiniti makes dinosaurs it’s far superior …
@@taylor1589 indeed
It doesn’t lack power. It’s plenty quick and handles like a bmw. Great SUV
You probably didn't try the CRV. It feels way more powerful. I mean, even a 10 year old Camry does the 0-60 quicker.
It did lack power compared to others in the class
@@thewirah1yep but somehow it feels slow in crv because of the cvt
Great review. I had rented a diesel CX-5 in Japan 2 months ago and was absolutely shocked to see how refined and quiet it was. It is by far the quietest and most hushed unit both inside and outside the cabin among all brands (Germans included). Volkswagen may have tainted the image of diesel cars with the diesel gate, however, as shown by Mazda, the fuel is not to blame for but the lousy, sneaky corporatism. Another engineering milestone and winner from Mazda.
Nice review. I bought a cx-9. I love it. Not sure why more people arent going towards mazda. The sedans are georgeous and their line of suv/crossover is sick.
P.s. chose it over a range rover i originally had my sights on.
What like a 99 Range Rover?
Just got ours 2 days ago. Frickin love it! We fell in love with the interior and softer ride. Test drove Rav-4 and CR-V and never gave Mazda a thought until, on accident, we saw a side by side video comparing the CR-V vs. CX-5. First thing we noticed was the aggressive front end. It looks bad ass! We then had to go to the dealership and check it out for ourselves. The reviews on this site is pretty much spot on. We chose the CX-5 mainly because of the interior and softer and quieter ride than the others in its class. Of course the CR-V has more oomph, but the CX-5 power is good enough for us. It's not like we are planning on breaking any land speed records any time soon. As for as using the same engine. No problem. At least when I need to find parts, they'll be readily available because they have been using the same engine in a lot of their vehicles for a while now.
I have that exact car. Love everything about it.
Do you still love it?looking into getting one. 2004 mazda 6 is dying. Heard issues w infotainment inc x5. Any issues?
I'm not fond of CUVs but I exceptionally like the CX 5
Damn you sofyan, I want one of these with a passion and of course I was notified of your video haha, great as always.
Keith I just bought one today. Exactly the same as in the review except black interior. Amazing car! I’m in love
Actually, Mazda's new SkyactivX engine will use spark plug AND compression ignition, depending on engine load. This is what makes it unique from other HCCI attempts in the past. They just recently had a journalist testing event for that engine in Germany and all were impressed. It produces slightly more power than the 2.5 SkyactivG and improves fuel economy by a whopping 30 percent! Car and Driver noted some knocking in certain low RPM situations, but I suspect that will get worked out before production, which is slated to begin in 2019.
Great review! The best driving and nicest looking CUV in its class! No CVT! Thank you Mazda.
That's a Mazda? DAMN! Looking good.
mazda has the most beautiful lineup of cars out right now. one day i will own the cx3 or cx5, the absolute ferfect vehicles
You know what . Your reviews are honest, straight forward and professional. Thank you
Bought mine a couple days ago and I'm in heaven 🤗🤗
Holy Sh*t that is one sexy vehicle.. 😦
We agree with that. ;)
@@MazdaOman 1
Another great review. I really like how thorough you are with your reviews, you touch on details others ignore but that may be important to a lot of buyers. Well done.
I can't choose between cx5 and forester XT! XT has the power I want but the cx5 has the interior I love! Which performs and handles the best but with the best luxury?
What did you end up going with?
Over the years of watching you, these edits get more and more legit :D
As always I like your reviews in any brand of cars specially this one. This car is gorgeous and as most people said it is fun to drive that's why I choose this one for myself to buy. I'm excited to drive it. I've been waiting for your review of this car for a very long time as it is always the most complete one.
Please include reviews of sound systems. Great review as always!
As always, stellar review! The updated CX-5 should lead to even more consumers flocking into Mazda dealers. I was shocked when I heard the MPG ratings, though. The previous MX-5 offered pretty great fuel economy out of its SkyActiv Technology engine, but this updated one seems to leave a bit more desired in that area (maybe the increased weight, different tire choice, updated EPA rating scale, and the slightly updated engine tuning caused a slight drop)... 🤔
The exterior of this vehicle most definitely boasts a more poised and athletic stance over the taller previous model, though.
Also, the interior is leagues ahead of many of its older competitors, as well. It just needs minor technological updates and it will be golden! 🌟🌟🌟
Overall, I feel like this update was a pleasent one for Mazda to conduct. Once Mazda offers that Diesel option, I feel like the CX-5 will be the 'complete' package for people looking for the best of both worlds in their Compact Utility Vehicle.
From one car enthusiast to another, keep up the great work, Sofyan! 👍🏽
DraveAndBeDriven don't listen to these two gutter level degenerates. Your reviews are great and morons like this will never produce anything of value.
Bruce Solomon, Thank you so much for your comment, but as you know everyone has their own opinion. Honestly, I truly enjoy being as through as possible with my reviews, and likewise, in my comments.
why update when it works? mazda connect is easily the most intuitive and easy to use software on the market. thats like asking apple to change its its UI. mazda definitely goes with the mindset of "we will give you less but we make sure its the best"
there are some cons for sure, but exterior and interior design is the winner out of all competitors in its segments
This is the most honest and accurate review I have ever seen.
Ordered a 2017 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring w/ Premium Package this week but grey (same package shown). It shipped from Japan and arrived to port in Seattle Monday. Now have to wait for it to come to Chicago by train. I cannot wait! Great Review btw. My brother purchased the competitor the 2017 Honda CR-V Touring. Sharp car as well.
Same waiting here, my akera will be delivered in 7th October
Same here. Waiting to be delivered ...
Today is the big day! The dealership called and the new CX-5 is ready to be picked up. Hopefully I don't regret not purchasing another Acura / Honda in the long run of 5 years.
Mazda is adding more sound deadening in their cars? They now have my attention.
Kenny if only they could fix the suspension
I had a mazda 6 sedan 2015. Jesus christ the tire noise was loud.
@@ogieogilthorpe6717 I'm a bit late on this comment, but you should test drive a 2018 Mazda 6. They fixed the tire noise and suspension.
How does the driving experience compare with the 2017 Kia Sportage SX?
Thanks for being the only reviewer for pointing out the coarse and intrusive engine noise. I thought I would love this car but the engine noise was so loud and under powered. Felt like I was driving an 80s econobox.
What the Mazda lacks in not having a turbo like the new cr-v it makes up for not having a CVT like the Honda, yea the Honda may have more features but the Mazda looks so much sexier and is much sportier
Robert Davis amen
So comparing this to the Kia Sportage SX (turbo), which do you think is better? Also, looking for advice on choosing a new-ish mainstream SUV like this Mazda vs. a used Audi Q5/BMW x1. Thoughts?
How was the new lane assistant? Anything different from the previous model? Thanks
The soft touch part of the dash is actually a type of leather and the wood is actually real Cenwood.....(this car is in every way as good as an entry level BMW....I crossed shop both and actually drove the CX5 to a BMW dealer and they were blown away by the quality of the interior)...So if you’re going to compare it a mid to upper level Beamer then of course there’s not much of a comparison (or is there😉), but it’s every bit as nice, if not nicer, than the entry level luxury cars that are often times 10k more...
Living in Scottsdale Arizona I experienced that during the hotter summer months the heads up display stops working during extreme temps. Mazda REALLY needs to look at correcting this (even if they have to go back to an imbedded display, or even one that goes up and down like audi...)
Sofyan if you were looking to drop your cash on a used SUV which one of these would you get Mazda CX-5, Honda CRV, Hyundai Tucson, Toyota RAV4? Could you list them in order and why. Thanks so much man good videos. Also I did have a chance to look at this CX5 and noticed the rubber around the door frame was the most loose I've seen in awhile
Bought a cx-5 Sport. I 💙 it!
Mazda really is on the upswing, especially with the new low emissions engine that they just developed. I like it a lot
rear seats are actually 40/20/40 and/or 60/40 in case anyone is interested. i got the white gt w/premium. great vehicle!
Blake Ewing question. Do you feel like the vehicle is underpowered? I know it's a family vehicle, but the engine just seems incredibly wimpy for the size of the car.
OpticObsidiaN you know, I can see how someone might say that depending on what they're used to driving. But, I haven't really had any complaints in that. I think a 2.0 turbo would be nice though.
I have a 2016 CX5. It has plenty of power for most people's needs around town and on the highway. The only time I've wished for more power is driving through N. GA mountains, loaded down with people and cargo. Its a great, fun to drive SUV.
Everyone is ripping on the engine, but I think the engine is on par with competitors' numbers on comparable engines. Ford's 2.5L puts out the same numbers, as does Jeep's 2.4L, although everyone wants to compare this to a turbo i4 or v6 option. Honestly, it's a fair assessment considering Mazda only has one engine option, but that is why they put all the energy into the transmission tuning. Could it use a turbo, sure! Mazda even admits that any engine will fit in any engine bay, so you could always drop a 2.5T in there and get almost double the power if you really wanted to. Good luck getting your hands on one, tho.
While it's not gonna beat anyone in a drag race, I have zero complaints about acceleration because it FEELS like it's moving quicker than it really is, since the trans is so responsive. As a city driver, I think it's great. It's able to get out of its own way, can weave in and out of traffic, and provides a little bit of fun in a stop-n-go commute. On the weekends, I can take it out and play on the highway and still be able to open it up and enjoy it.
It's not the engine that is the issue it's the lack of an upgrade engine. While the 2.5 is sufficient for most consumers and on par with the competition, there will always be a fraction of buyers that want more power. So, it's kind of a missed opportunity for Mazda because some competitors offering an upgrade engine.
And people think that adding turbos will be the best option. www.carthrottle.com/post/engineering-explained-the-pros-and-cons-of-turbochargers-vs-superchargers/
Steven Joe unfortunately for car makers fractions of buyers don’t make them money.
2 yrs ago, this engine was more than enough and better than most in class, now its anemic? lol ok
Well said!
Tired of hearing 'Hard to tell the difference between old CX5 and the new one'. Every single panel is different. The A-pillar is further back, the roofline is lower, the front end and side character lines are completely different. No the engine doesn't need updating, it was state of the art 5 years ago and most competitors have only just caught up to it's efficiency.
Been looking at this beautiful car since it came out and I reallllly want a grand touring. But my only concern is, is it quick from a stop? My 2010 Ford sport trac feels sluggish and I love that umph when you get pushed back in your seat. The only thing I wanna know is Can I get up and go with this car faster than my truck?
ok sofyan,
but which would YOU buy if it was your money. fully loaded cr-v or fulled loaded cx-5?
Honestly, right now? I would get the CR-V, until I drive the diesel CX-5 or wait for the SkyActiv-X engine, which is rumored to be supercharged.
- Sofyan
Redline Reviews i agree
IRL Zoom zoom gets shut down by the mom-mobile with more SUV practicality and efficiency... www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-v/2017/2017-honda-cr-v-vs-2017-mazda-cx-5-comparison-review/
Great review, you nailed all the good points and faults. The range launches in thailand in 2 months although maybe without the option of cream trim and possibly carries over the old diesel engine.
Hey I love your reviews! The sunroof is actually available as a preferred package on the touring model, not standard.
When buying a few years ago, I test drove about everything in this class, the CR-V, The Rav4, CX5, etc. I ended up wanted a little more size and power, so went with the Acura RDX, but I will say that the Mazda was easily my top choice amongst the rest, and I was surprised by that. Since, I've recommended it to several and all have been pleased with their purchase! The intangible is this... By far the most fun to drive!
C. Michael Rush i may just wait til 2019 for the next RDX, because all these SUVs leave me unsatisfied, and I dont wanna choose only between the Murano and Ford Edge.
Vic da G I totally understand, it is a tough to find something inspiring without moving into some huge bucks...
Great review! I'm getting my cx tomorrow... It is the same you have in your review. Can't wait
Mazda CX-5 is truly a spectacular car that exemplifies the Mazda prestige.
The Mazda 6 now has a 2.5 turbo. Put that in this and I'm buying
Luke Hoisington honestly though
Get your wallet ready, the 2019 comes with that engine!!
@@ngoandrew8 Thank god! The Japanese model just came out and it's official. Can't wait to check it out! I was almost leaning towards the Honda edging it out for me, but if this new engine checks out screw Honda I'm going in on the sportier Mazda.
+1 just waiting the info on 2.5turbo on cx5
they have a turbo one now!
This needs a twin turbo V6 immediately.
sofyan you mentioned the Skyactive X will be. available in a few months at 15:52 but I believe it will come out in 2019-2020. Please check that :)
Good review but annoying the you keep wanting things updated that either work or are not that old - such as the key fob (2012), the Mazda connect head unit (2015) and the engines (introduced 2012).
I am also surprised you cannot tell the first generation from the second. This one is much more stylish and premium.
The six speed auto is fantastic and so what if it isn`t 8 speed, what matters is how well it works.
Guy A the guys sounds a like pretentious douche bag
Excellent Review Sofyan! I'm impressed with how Mazda continues to deliver fantastic results with their vehicles on an overall scale, with the 2nd Gen CX-5 being no exception! Aside from the forth coming diesel engine offering, I do wish that the company would look into developing SkyActiv V6 Engines for at least one of their vehicles to be more competitive with the other automakers, while at the same time giving consumers more options to look at if they choose to buy a Mazda in a configuration like that.
In addition, after testing both the redesigned Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5, which one do you like the best?
- Michael
Between the CR-V and CX-5, we actually find the CR-V to be more appealing. We like its turbo engine and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Once Mazda updates that though, the needle will swing in the Mazda's favor.
I was just watching the '16 version video 😂😂
Sofyan, where did you get word on the diesel version? The Mazda website has nothing but a notify me thing, but good insider stuff is always good :D
I never had much luck trying to drive without my hands on the steering wheel.. at least that's how I failed my driving test
😂😂
Mazda is on a roll!
Idk why but when he opened the 12V cover and struggled to cover back up I couldn't help but laugh cause when he shifted his body language said "Fuck this damn cover won't close back up" lol 😂
Which crossover here better
Mazda CX5 OR Honda CRV 2017
To you
yet another great review. quick question. im looking into purchasing a 2017 explorer sport. i think it looks strong. but its a police car... do you recomend any other suv ?
We haven't driven the latest Explorer Sport but we did fall in love with the twin-turbo V6. The interior of the Ford could use some work and we also don't like how heavy and ponderous it feels on the road. We'd also recommend a Jeep Grand Cherokee, Mazda CX-9, and maybe even the new 2018 Traverse, though we haven't driven that one yet.
Screw a police a car get s Mazda bro I got a 3 i Touring customized and screw American cars period
This is really nice. Are these reliable cars?
I test drove this vehicle a few times before. The car is amazing but desperately needs a more powerful engine. Mazda, just put the engine from CX-9 and cap it around 210HP and that would be fantastic.
Turbos aren't usually the best option. Reliable issues. www.carthrottle.com/post/engineering-explained-the-pros-and-cons-of-turbochargers-vs-superchargers/
Well how else are we supposed to squeeze more power without adding size and cylinders. CAFE is not being nice to any manufacturer anymore. Auto makers have no choice in this game to downsize and add turbos. This whole "Turbos are unreliable" is a crock of shit from Consumer Reports and you know it.
Also an "article" from a biased and second party "reviewer" are about as reliable as their insight in this industry
Automakers are going to electric route anyway to get replace combustion engines. Hybrids and electric are the way to go sadly. With naturally aspirated engines reaching its limits, electric motors will be more common. Boosting more power and efficiency. More supercars are going to electric motors to gain more power. Also this article is from Engineering Explained. Unlike you with no knowledge he pointed out the pros and cons of turbos. Turbos have their problems and they aren't reliable like naturally aspirated engines and the maintenance cost will be expensive. Jason knows what he talking about.
Kellan Larson
Oh yeah Mazda did say they were going to increase the compression ratio of their SkyActiv engines. Even Sofyan said it Mazda was going to that route. In case you missed that and didn't listen, 15:50.
Joshua Johnson Mazda did make a statement on hybridization. Mazda claims it will use hybrids but not within the cycles of the current model lineup. That is still several years away
Just replaced our 2 1/2 year old CX-5 with exactly the same (lease was up). Also liked the old rims better, the new design makes the wheels look smaller. Definitely more quiet and sharper but the retuned steering's weight is lighter than the old (which I preferred). Apple CarPlay and traffic on the NAV are necessary add ons.
Any idea about the 2019 turbo? Updated infotainment? I'd also like to know if it's coming out in that ceramic metallic like the miata?
Is this the uk version? Sun roof? Also press break pedal to start you said. Isn’t it the clutch you have to press? Beautiful car.
Automatic has no clutch pedal, all top versions have an option for a sunroof, in Europe we can get it with revolution top. But this old system for a rear view camera is a let down imo.
Just my 2 cents, but I don't understand why reviewers continue to compare the CX-5 with CRV, Hyundai and RAV4. The CX5 is great looking SUV with a luxury/refined interior, while the other SUVs are UGLY and have plastic interiors. I keep hearing no power, limited off the line acceleration and no passing power, what? This is not a sports car, it's a comfortable, easy to drive, get around town SUV. Sometimes, I think reviewers watch other reviewers videos first and just regurgitate the same points. Take the Mazda badge off the CX5 and compare features, fit, finish and pricing to BMW X1/X3 and Audi A3 and I think you have a more reasonable comparison. I usually like Redline reviews, but this one is a miss! Btw, don't you have a Miata? I don't hear you talking about getting blown away off the line in your "sports car" , I'm just saying.
Agreed. Usually Sofyan provides balanced and insightful commentary but him saying this needs more power and in the same breath touts the CR-V (with its CVT) as a comparable and possibly better option for enthusiasts is confusing. Like you said, these are not sports cars - this is for carrying your family and sh*t around town but still having an enjoyable drive. How's that CVT drone in the CR-V?
Also, the comment on if you want more power you can go with something like the eco boosted Escape lmao. Please, man. Fix Or Repair Daily.
As much as it annoys CX5 owners/lovers it is a generic compact SUV. Just like a RAV4, CR-V, Tuscon etc. Its not an Audi or Lexus competitor. Since we got that out the way I will admit the CX5 and the new CRV are the standouts in this class. And since people buy these not for their sporting pretension but for their practicality, the CRV wins. The marginally better driving dynamics cant out punch the CRV which is faster and more efficient and far more practical. Dont start on looks either, I think they both look dandy in their own way
It's in the same exact class as the CR-V, Hyundai, and RAV 4. Keep in mind you literally just talked about "looks" more than anything and you can't make fair points based on opinions instead of facts. Looks are subjective.
Also, Mazda purposely advertises itself as a sportier model. It's not a sports car, because it's an SUV, but it's aiming to be a sportier SUV while still maintaining many of the practical functions you get out of a "SPORTS" utility vehicle (aka SUV). That first letter in "SUV" stands for sport and they are just leaning more towards the sports side of it.
In fact, the 2019 model actually improved the engine so now you do get that punch and shows you exactly what they are aiming to do. The reason to get this car over the Honda CR-V, Toyota, Hyundai, etc is this is for the more sportier feel. From a ln actual objective standpoint (not subjective like looks) the Honda CR-V out performs this vehicle hands down in most categories. It even has faster acceleration with a CR-V transmission and more towing/torque. It also has more space which are key components of wanting a SUV to begin with. It has better MPG. Your only qualm is you think it looks worse which is debatable depending on whom you ask. Besides, looks alone aren't good enough when we're getting down to the nitty gritty.
I disagree with your assertion. This is not a luxury vehicle. It is still in direct competition with those in its actual class. It may have a luxury feel, but that doesn't equate to being in the same class as a Alfa Romeo, Lexus, Porsche, etc. which would likely all have more than just the looks anyhow and stout better performance overall in many models. It's a step in a direction towards a more luxurious cabin, but you're overstepping boundaries to call it a full on luxury vehicle simply because you like the looks.
It's a fine review and redline understands the audience and actual class this car is in direct competition with here. Can't wait for the 2019 model, because it literally does exactly what this review is harping on and shows how off you actually are here if you don't think Mazda is going for a sportier vehicle.
@@caseyfryback8271 Say what you want, but Mazda is going in the direction of making its models more sportier and packing a bigger punch overall. They are evolving into a more sportier model SUV and are marketing towards those types of people who may want a bit more of a sportier feel in their SPORTS utility vehicle. Doesn't have to be a full on sports car to have more of a sports feel similar dynamics.
Don't believe me, go look at the new 2019 model of this car they just packed on a much more powerful turbo engine and upped the horsepower for a reason. If they truly didn't care about making the car a sportier model or letting you have more power there would be no reason to make it so. So I must say, you are off if you think requesting an upgrade that this Mazda has actually been moving towards and is now releasing was off. The upgrades starts to put it in range with the Forrester XT that is mentioned in this very video. Gotta pay attention to industry before commenting. Mazda has always been the type to lean towards sportier cars. There SUV's are no exception and thus it is perfectly in line to have requested and be in expectance of many of the things he mentioned. Especially since the newest model actually follows just that.
My Honda Fit is so harsh on bumps would like to go into a SUV , forester, crv , Mazda etc can you recommend the best riding SUV , thanks
Loved my Fit sport MT, but decided to upgrade to a small suv for safety, space, and comfort. We heavily researched and test drove what you listed. Rav4 and Forrester is nice, but dated platform. Cx5 is slick sexy and feels fast, but IRL Zoom zoom gets shut down by the mom-mobile CRV with more SUV practicality and efficiency... www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-v/2017/2017-honda-cr-v-vs-2017-mazda-cx-5-comparison-review/
That head unit definitely needs an update... Looks so small too.
Planning to get this car in the future, hopefully they update it by then haha
Yeah it does need an update. I own this and it doesn't even show album art for siruisxm. Hopefully it'll get much better when the apple car play update comes out in the next couple months
AJ 佐罗 the size doesn't matter, it's what you do with the size that matters.
Brian Lawrance Are we talking about the same thing here or what? 😏
AJ 佐罗 more or less yes...the same concept😉😉
The infotainment screen looks like mazda forgot to put the screen at the last moment so they just sticked a screen on top of the dash .
Safe styling? Every other vehicle in the class looks like either a deranged robot (CR-V) or an amorphous blob (Rogue). This is the only one with class, although the wheel wells are HUGE. The interior is also in a league of its own. My wife has a Grand Select in dark blue; it's fantastic.
You mentioned the Ford Escape 2.0 liter. When are you reviewing that vehicle?
the original 2007 cx7 made 244 hp! i really wish they bring that power back in the future
They're bringing the 2.5T from the 6 to this next year.
Has anyone heard of paint issues with Mazda products? In my research, I am stumbling upon a lot of complaints from owners claiming the paint chips very easily.
Did we ever get the diesel here in the states?
It's about time 🙌🏼 I've been waiting . . . . . . & waiting for your review on the CX-5 😂👌🏾
The wheels look a lot like the ones on my 2015 Toyota Camry XSE V6.
So basically what you're saying with the latest update is it's slower, less economical, lower (less practical with ground clearance and interior space), and more expensive than the outgoing model year?
It's also more refined, quieter, has a better ride quality, a nicer cabin, and has more standard equipment to justify the price increase. Is it better than the 2016.5 model? Mostly, yes. Could Mazda make the 2017 even better? Of course.
I agree...However when compared to the CRV a vehicle that is around the same size and price but has a lot more room inside, has better gas mileage and is faster, I'd be hard pressed to choose the CX-5 over the it(these are Utility Vehicles first). Granted the Mazda is better looking, but surely it could be better looking without such a long nose robbing the Utility Vehicle of a lot of it's utility/space inside. I could live with just a little less space inside just like I could live with the CRV with just a little less driving dynamics.
Doesn't Mazda know they are competing with the CRV?
With all that being said, when the deisel comes out and it gets better gas mileage, and being real world faster with all that torque, not to mention less maintenance and probably longer lasting engine, I'd then take it over the CRV and live with the dramatic interior space difference in the same size package,
We test drove a 2018 CRV hoping to love it because it ticked all the other boxes for us. However, it had no character on the test drive and the CVT wasn't that good (compared to the Forester XT CVT which is the only acceptable one we had test driven). We picked up a CX5 last month and love it so far.
is 2017 or 2018 honda civic faster than this?is it really that slow? thanks
I wish it had the 2.5l turbo, if it had that I think more people would purchase this car
They're doing it in 2019
would it be possible to have the prices in Canadian and US funds ? thank you !
Mazda CX-5 2,2 bi-turbo Sky-D 150 Hp km/l 17,9. it also come as 175 hp and AWD and it returns around 17,2 km/l :) EU models
Mazda's new Skyactiv X engine is NOT stated to hit markets until 2019, debuting in the all-new 4th Generation Mazda 3, so its essentially two years away not months.
Very Jaguarish front end? Or just me? Over all, beautiful car
Awesome Review Of 2017 Mazda CX-5. 😀
Ammazing review! Mazda needs a turbo engine to pair whit that fantastic looks.... love this car!
Hi Sofyan, really like your reviews. Just to point out that the new Skyactiv X won't be available until 2019.
Would be interesting to hear some opinions on this versus the new 2018 mazda 6 since both are in the same price range. Great detailed video btw!
Would this be a better family vehicle over a Honda fireblade 😁?
the cargo area was reduced from 65.4ft3 to 59.6ft3, now is heavier, reduced mpg by 5, still not android or Apple carplay, same motor, only +3hp, no turbo option, looks very similar than before... what was Mazda doing for this gen again?!
I don't think you mentioned that the CX-5 's new motor will be a diesel . That should give very good fuel economy . Hopefully it also gives a bit more power. And also yes , very good review. Redline is the one I prefer.
Mazda is asking a lot from their Skyactive 2.5L engine. It's in the Mazda3s, the Mazda6i, the CX-5. Depending on the weight of the vehicle. I will be either spot on (Mazda3s or feel a little under powered). The handling and overall fit and finish more than make up for the lack of acceleration.
I would like to know what's the paint code? on this beauty if you dnt mind
It is good as it is no need for fancy useless updates that make it expensive and adds no really value. Keep it like that just perfect 👌
so wait for 2018 model?
From what I saw the seats fold 40, 40, 20 not 60, 40
It doesn't surprise me that this guy gets the information incorrect on the vehicles that he does reviews on that's because he doesn't really do the research on the vehicles he just says whatever he wants to and that's obvious
I personally prefer the previous design, the refresh does look sleeker with cleaner lines, but it lacks character that previous one has.
When I bought my first Mazda which was 3 sedan, I became a big fan of their cars, I used to be a Honda fanboy, but not anymore, Mazda interior is simply the best, the ergonomics are really well laid out and designed with the driver in mind, it's so comfortable that I would not mind living inside the car if I had to.
Mazda does lack the latest tech features, but if you need all that tech stuff to drive, you are not a good driver to begin with.
While inline-4 engine from Mazda is adequate I do sometimes wish it had more high-end power when on the highway, I've floored the gas pedal on CX-5 once and I don't think it can go faster than 85 mph to be honest. If they put anything close to Honda's delicious V6 engine in there, it would be golden.
I think the Mazda car that I own now will be my last gasoline powered car, I will be driving it for 3 to 4 more years, by that time, EV models will be widely offered by many car companies and I will probably get one of those and say good bye to gasoline car forever.
Pretty good and quick overall review! Thanks!
But the price is a down part for the top end trims . I know mazda is targeting against competitors like german brand entry models but they really need to improve a lot in everything.