Thank you - this is exactly what I have been looking for to put Bible stories into some kind of easily understood geographical context for some kids I'm working with. It's so simple and clear. Thanks for your work in making it!
Jewish kids arround 11-12 years old they get a biblical hebrew readin of the Torah by themselves alone, tell them about that. And tell them to get the 5 books of Moses and read by themselves.
its wayyyy easier to understand the Bible if you know where all the places are. i found the Bible so hard to read as a child because of all the names and places, but seeing everything on a map is so helpful in giving perspective.
Count me in too! I was raised as a Devil Buddhist, but now saved and worship The LORD Jesus Christ. This video is really valuable for a self study servant of Jesus.
Great work!👍 I'm a very visual learner so this is fantastic. When I'm reading and locations are mentioned I always feel a void in my understanding. Thank you!
The Muslims ruled this land for a long period without interruption except in one event, which was the Crusaders’ seizure of it. As for the Jews, they ruled for short periods and between each period there was a long period of time.
Either way the people came to the land via conquest, not invite. So the only princple that we can learn from this is that whoever is strong enough to hold the land and govern it, is the rightful owner of it. Anyway, both Mohammad and the Jews tell us to use the OT and so the OT tells us that Israel was given to the Jews BY GOD. So if anyone has any claim to it then it is certainly them.
Abraham came from Ur Kasdim (Chaldees), which would've been in Upper Mesopotamia (Assyria). Also, his name is Semitic/Assyrian meaning 'High Father'. 1 major issue about Abraham being from the 'Land of the Chaldees' yet being from Sumerian city of Ur is that around the 20th century BC, when Abraham was alive, the "Chaldeans" were not established as an entity or province in southern Mesopotamian Ur until around the 9th century BC when the Chaldeans migrated south. Another interesting fact is that in different Akkadian dialects, the "S" sound is interchangeable with the "L" sound, so Kasdi became Kaldi (Chaldean) over time.
The Ur of Abraham is uncertain. There is also an “Urfa” in Turkey which they claim was his home. This was way closer the Canaan and adjacent to Haran, the city he stops at on his way to Canaan. I think it’s a good candidate. The Sumerian Ur may have had semitic peoples in it during the time of Abraham assuming he lived around the 18th century BC. That is when a large influx of Amorites migrated into mesopotamia, and pretty much took over (Hamurabi, king of babylon, and Shamsi Adad I, king of Assyria, were both of Amorite descent). The Amorites were very similar to other north western semitic groups, including the Canaanites, Arameans, and Hebrews. So is it possible there was a Hebrew by the name of Abraham living in Sumer in the early part of the late bronze age? Not really, since nobody would have identified as a Hebrew at that time as the Hebrew language had not even evolved into existence. Paleo-hebrew descends from canaanite, and the hebrews and arameans were both very close. Haran was an Aramean trading town and in genesis both Isaac and Jacob get their wives from their. Their families were essentially mixed Aramean and Hebrew. Nowadays it is believed the Hebrews were a branch of the Canaanites who sought to create their own culture and identity distinct from that of those who they came from. Similar to how Christianity is a branch of Judaism.
No. The bible clearly states that Ur Kasidim was on the other side of the Euphrates, and that they passed Haran on the way to Canaan. Sumerian Ur fits none of those criteria.
Nice effort. Now try and read the book of divisions and weeks of the Hebrews, Jubilees, as the garden of Eden, the starting point of mankind is located in the land of the rising sun. Men came from the east to settle in the so called middle east/navel of the earth Genesis 11
@@bbl361 "Traditions over Truth" is not particular to those religions. Every single type of Human thought, be it a religion or a philosophy, an ethical system, are "Traditions over truth".
LOGIC is defined as “the science of correct thinking”. If you are not a member of the Catholic Church, ARE YOU LOGICAL? Before you answer, read first the following: “THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT TRUTH!!! The Catholic Church was founded by Jesus Christ, and its “constitution”, called the Bible, are the Old Testament and the New Testament (compiled by Pope Damasus I & called “Bible” by Pope Selecius). Jesus said: “Thou art Peter, the rock, and upon this rock I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Mathew 16:18). “Think not that I come to destroy the law and the prophets (Old Testament). I come not to destroy but to fulfill (New Testament).” (Mathew 5:17). Almost all other so-called Christian churches, were organized by operations of law, and therefore, are mere JURIDICAL organizations, which were organized by men by adopting the Bible of the Catholic Church as their “constitution” but giving it interpretations different from the official interpretations of its owner, the Catholic Church. Jesus gave authority to Peter (and his successors, the. Popes) to make “infallible decisions on heavenly matters”, when He said in Mathew 16:19: “And I will give unto thee the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, and whatsoever Thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatsoever Thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Jesus then gave authority to the eleven disciples to teach and baptize all nations: “Go ye therefore and teach all nations , baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe whatsoever I have commanded you, and lo, I am with you always till the end of the world.” (Mathew 28:19-20). Only the Catholic Church was given by Jesus Christ authority to baptize and to teach. Since the Catholic Church has the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, it follows that only the faithful members of the Catholic Church can use the keys to enter the Kingdom of heaven. Those who are not members of the Catholic Church are ergo against the Catholic Church headed by Christ, and so, they are anti-Catholic Church and anti-Christ. And so, they cannot use the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, which were given only to the Catholic Church, impliedly for its faithful members. From the year 33 A.D. to the year circa 1517 A.D., there was only one church of God the Son Jesus Christ, now called Catholic Church to distinguish it from many other man-made juridical organizations. All those who are not members of the Catholic Church headed by Christ are ANTI-CATHOLIC CHURCH and are impliedly ANTI-CHRIST. BE REMINDED THAT IT IS CHRIST WHO WILL COME TO JUDGE THE LIVING AND THE DEAD ON THE LAST JUDGEMENT DAY. (END)” (Compiled by Jun Densing)
Friend, I disagree. I was raised in the Catholic Church. My mom was a devout Christian in the Catholic Church. I was baptized at two weeks, and of course first communion and confirmation as well. And thank God through my mother’s introduction to Christ. But I did not know Jesus as my Lord and Saviour till I was 53 . And only by Gods grace and mercy can I call myself a child of God ( I like Man of God now) . I was a functioning addict living in this fallen world. And living for self . I was led by the Holy Spirit to Calvary Baptist church . Where I believe I’m hearing the word (Bible) taught to me the way it should . No Hail Mary, no priest advocating as God the father. Showing up every week, month year and confessing my sins and say 5 Hail Mary. Now I know what true repentance is . I have a direct line to Christ who lives in me now. To help me with my obedience. The sprinkling of water at two weeks of age is not baptism . Baptism is emersion and testifying your obedience to God before others and accepting Jesus into your life in front of others believes . You should know this as it is written in the early part of the book of John . Again , I respect the Catholic Church because my Mother was a God fearing , humble , gracious, loving women of faith. And maybe other denominations as well. But I am convicted by the Holy Spirit the word , the message I’m being fed through Calvary is the truth, way and life . I appreciate your thoughts as well , and pray that we can both go and make disciples. Blessings
The Catholic Church is not part of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. The Apostles, then word of God, which was later written in homes and delivered to the Albigensian people, who were being persecuted by the Catholic Church because they were independent and were not Gnostics. The Bible made its way into Europe, then to the rest of the entire world. English became the dominant language here in 2024 around the world. God does not dwell in a temple made with hands. Jesus says we are the body of Christ, a holy temple. Revelation 17.
And Darwin turns in his grave pffffffffff........... In the name of Christ so many people have died. If you don't have the evidence you star believing.
The Bible is the real literal words of God, and since God can't lie, the Bible is truth. This is believed by Christians and Jews and other related religion. Christianity expounds on this by adding the New Testament as well. It is the original Hebrew and Greek texts that are inspired, which is the term used to describe how God wrote the Bible, which is inspiring writers and telling them what to write
@okon7464 But what are you saying isn't historical fact and how do you know. I understand all the criticism about the first few chapters of Genesis, but those chapters don't make up the whole Bible. If there are unattested parts of the Bible, such as the Abraham story, that doesn't mean the stories are false. It just means that we don't have any independent attestation for it. So what stories aren't historical and how would you know? Why would you say that they aren't historical?
@blusheep2 In the Bible Abraham is from Chaldaean Ur, Chaldaeans werent in Ur till VI century BCE, which means the story was written around VI century BCE, because author had no idea about, he was writing based on information he had. We have no archeological records for jews being enslaved, no archeological records for conquer of Kanaan, no records for united jewish kingdom of David. These stories just don't fit into the world. I recommend to read Mario Liverani's works
@okon7464 Certainly Ur of the Chaldeans is one of those Biblical references that have confused scholars for some time. That doesn't mean it was written later. One simple option is a scribal update. Where an older unknown city was updated to its modern name so that the readers would understand the story better. Another possibility mentioned by many scholars is that the Ur that Abraham lived in was the UR in Turkey, and not Babylon. The Hebrew word translated "Chaldeans" has a few other possible translations though they aren't favored. So I think this is a question that still hasn't been satisfactorily answered but it doesn't force the conclusion that the story is a late fabrication. As for archeological records of Jews being enslaved, this is a bit true and a bit false. What we have records for is Semitic slaves which Jews were a part of that greater group. I could go into more detail but when the Hyksos were kicked out of Egypt, those that couldn't flee as fast as the armies and administration, were enslaved and we know this from the biography of the general that expelled them from Avaris. Not only that we know from archeology that Avaris, the captial of the Semitic Hyksos dynasty, remained a Semitic city for quite some time following the Hyksos expulsion. We also know archeologically that the city of Avaris became a ghost town in the middle of Rameses II's reign because the people of Pi-Rameses used the entire site as a graveyard. Avaris at its height, held 100,000 people. Its was a gigantic Semitic city. The Hebrews would have been mixed up with this group. We do have archeological records of the conquest of Canaan. First we have the Mereneptah Stele from the late Bronze Age IIb. This victory stele records Mereneptah's defeat of the Libyans and some cities in Canaan after they rebelled. It mentions the people Israel in the land and brags that Mereneptah put them in their place. The way they are referred to is as a people group and not yet a nation which is exactly what we should be expecting as the conquest had just begun. At this same time, (Late Bronze IIb and early Iron Age I) it is now agreed that there is a population explosion. Not a reshuffling of the current people. Over 300 new settlements spring up throughout Canaan and they are all Hebrew settlements. On top of this we have a destruction layer at Hatzor, a city said to have been burned in the conquest, dating to the time of the conquest. As of 2023 we have found the wall of Jericho from the time of the Conquest, as well. Though detractors had been saying for years that there was no city at the time of the conquest, we now have proof that there was. It wasn't detected earlier because their has been a massive amount of site leveling during later periods. There now is ample evidence of a united kingdom under David and certainly under Solomon. What you said is outdated. We now have found building construction such as the ones at Queiyfa(sp?) during David's reign and the gates of Gezer, Megiddo, and Hatzor that could only have been undertaken if there was a centralized government.
************************************************* *"The Lord has established His throne in heaven, And His kingdom rules over all."* -Psalm 103:19 *************************************************
Many historical accounts support what happened in the Bible judges onward, You can choose to say it isn't real just because it's biblical but that doesn't change its accuracy
It's fun to see someone talk about the Bible without having a clue about it. For example: 1 Kings (3 Kings), 2 Kings (4 Kings), 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles. There are tons of historically confirmed things. You can be atheist and absurdly ignorant at the same time.
Thank you - this is exactly what I have been looking for to put Bible stories into some kind of easily understood geographical context for some kids I'm working with. It's so simple and clear. Thanks for your work in making it!
Jewish kids arround 11-12 years old they get a biblical hebrew readin of the Torah by themselves alone, tell them about that. And tell them to get the 5 books of Moses and read by themselves.
I sure hope you don't fuck any of those kids like all the other bible thumpers did.
Fr
its wayyyy easier to understand the Bible if you know where all the places are. i found the Bible so hard to read as a child because of all the names and places, but seeing everything on a map is so helpful in giving perspective.
exactly
Thank you! This was just what I needed to hear.
Count me in too! I was raised as a Devil Buddhist, but now saved and worship The LORD Jesus Christ. This video is really valuable for a self study servant of Jesus.
The version i got had no sound?
@@only1thatmakessense
This is a video for the Deaf.
@@Narsuitus not at all inclusive then
Love! God Father and Jesus Lord bless you.
This was fantastic!!! Is there a part 2? Thank you so much
Great work!👍 I'm a very visual learner so this is fantastic. When I'm reading and locations are mentioned I always feel a void in my understanding. Thank you!
0:55 Mount Sinai is - surprise! - on the Sinai peninsula, not where the red dot is put.
some say it's in saudi arabia. look it up
@Anthophyta It is fact, not "opinion".
@@BiharyGabor no. because mount sinai is yet to be found in the sinai peninsula. that's why most people think it's in saudi arabia.
Jabal Al-Lawz
@@Anthophyta Could you elaborate? I cannot understand your word salad.
The "Old Testament" stands on its own as a complete message of eternal immutable truth.
And the New Testament is the new covenant prophecized in the Old Testament.
It's a biblical history history
@NEAR TERM EXTINCTION - HUMAN The Jesus myth theory is rejected by most historians
@@clouds-rb9xt nope. The new covenant is with the exact same people and comes as a result of the success of the first covenant
And to think God cares about any of you... hahaha
So good! Thank you!
This was miraculous 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏Thank you so much 💓💓💓 ever grateful to you ❣️❣️❣️
I like the part when Jericho explode
Does this have sound.
I didn't hear anything, and if you haven't gotten an answer in 8 months I'm not even asking them.
Excellent! ❤
Brilliant!
Very helpful!
I was wondering why there was no music to this video and then I saw the channel name and it made sense
Awesome! 👍
amazing, can i get it in ppt format
This is very helpful, thnk you!
@لا ترضى عنك اليهود والنصارى حتى تتبع ملتهم
What is your problem?
Wait... What? Sinai there? Can I ask for a source of information?
Exodus dummy
This is really cool,
Sir I am student paster ACTC clg in India sir nice vedio sir other books maps where sir share sir
The Muslims ruled this land for a long period without interruption except in one event, which was the Crusaders’ seizure of it. As for the Jews, they ruled for short periods and between each period there was a long period of time.
Except for before Islam
Either way the people came to the land via conquest, not invite. So the only princple that we can learn from this is that whoever is strong enough to hold the land and govern it, is the rightful owner of it. Anyway, both Mohammad and the Jews tell us to use the OT and so the OT tells us that Israel was given to the Jews BY GOD. So if anyone has any claim to it then it is certainly them.
So much of Mesopotamian history, all started there ❤
And we shall finish everything we started 😡🇮🇶🇸🇾
I wish is there a map like this in Arabic. I'm new Christian. I was a Muslim. So I can't understand the Old book. My English is not good sorry.
Good choice. Welcome to the faith brother.
@blusheep2
Thank you brother
I wonder what's happening in the rest of the world while all these were going on.
As Abraham came from Ur, a sumerian city, can we assume he was sumerian?
Abraham came from Ur Kasdim (Chaldees), which would've been in Upper Mesopotamia (Assyria). Also, his name is Semitic/Assyrian meaning 'High Father'. 1 major issue about Abraham being from the 'Land of the Chaldees' yet being from Sumerian city of Ur is that around the 20th century BC, when Abraham was alive, the "Chaldeans" were not established as an entity or province in southern Mesopotamian Ur until around the 9th century BC when the Chaldeans migrated south.
Another interesting fact is that in different Akkadian dialects, the "S" sound is interchangeable with the "L" sound, so Kasdi became Kaldi (Chaldean) over time.
The Ur of Abraham is uncertain. There is also an “Urfa” in Turkey which they claim was his home. This was way closer the Canaan and adjacent to Haran, the city he stops at on his way to Canaan. I think it’s a good candidate. The Sumerian Ur may have had semitic peoples in it during the time of Abraham assuming he lived around the 18th century BC. That is when a large influx of Amorites migrated into mesopotamia, and pretty much took over (Hamurabi, king of babylon, and Shamsi Adad I, king of Assyria, were both of Amorite descent). The Amorites were very similar to other north western semitic groups, including the Canaanites, Arameans, and Hebrews. So is it possible there was a Hebrew by the name of Abraham living in Sumer in the early part of the late bronze age? Not really, since nobody would have identified as a Hebrew at that time as the Hebrew language had not even evolved into existence. Paleo-hebrew descends from canaanite, and the hebrews and arameans were both very close. Haran was an Aramean trading town and in genesis both Isaac and Jacob get their wives from their. Their families were essentially mixed Aramean and Hebrew. Nowadays it is believed the Hebrews were a branch of the Canaanites who sought to create their own culture and identity distinct from that of those who they came from. Similar to how Christianity is a branch of Judaism.
No. The bible clearly states that Ur Kasidim was on the other side of the Euphrates, and that they passed Haran on the way to Canaan. Sumerian Ur fits none of those criteria.
He was ..... Yet we are different to all angry beyond limit
😇👍
👍👍👍
But Ismail missing
0:55 please remind me where mount Sinai is
Nice effort.
Now try and read the book of divisions and weeks of the Hebrews, Jubilees, as the garden of Eden, the starting point of mankind is located in the land of the rising sun. Men came from the east to settle in the so called middle east/navel of the earth Genesis 11
Y no voice
New Testament is the answer.
The whole Bible is the answer
Muslims thinking to themselves.. Now how does Mecca fit into this??
Islam, catholicism and Judaism are recent propositions relatively, they share quite a lot of commonality : traditions over Truth.
@@bbl361 islam makes christianity look so alien in comparison.
@@bbl361 "Traditions over Truth" is not particular to those religions. Every single type of Human thought, be it a religion or a philosophy, an ethical system, are "Traditions over truth".
Was that an empty land before Abram desedant reach Israel
This isn't the accurate map to the Bible is it?
Moses took the Israelites to Midian, Saudi Arabia, not the north.
LOGIC is defined as “the science of correct thinking”. If you are not a member of the Catholic Church, ARE YOU LOGICAL? Before you answer, read first the following:
“THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT TRUTH!!!
The Catholic Church was founded by Jesus Christ, and its “constitution”, called the Bible, are the Old Testament and the New Testament (compiled by Pope Damasus I & called “Bible” by Pope Selecius). Jesus said: “Thou art Peter, the rock, and upon this rock I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Mathew 16:18). “Think not that I come to destroy the law and the prophets (Old Testament). I come not to destroy but to fulfill (New Testament).” (Mathew 5:17).
Almost all other so-called Christian churches, were organized by operations of law, and therefore, are mere JURIDICAL organizations, which were organized by men by adopting the Bible of the Catholic Church as their “constitution” but giving it interpretations different from the official interpretations of its owner, the Catholic Church.
Jesus gave authority to Peter (and his successors, the. Popes) to make “infallible decisions on heavenly matters”, when He said in Mathew 16:19: “And I will give unto thee the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, and whatsoever Thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatsoever Thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
Jesus then gave authority to the eleven disciples to teach and baptize all nations: “Go ye therefore and teach all nations , baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe whatsoever I have commanded you, and lo, I am with you always till the end of the world.” (Mathew 28:19-20).
Only the Catholic Church was given by Jesus Christ authority to baptize and to teach. Since the Catholic Church has the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, it follows that only the faithful members of the Catholic Church can use the keys to enter the Kingdom of heaven.
Those who are not members of the Catholic Church are ergo against the Catholic Church headed by Christ, and so, they are anti-Catholic Church and anti-Christ. And so, they cannot use the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, which were given only to the Catholic Church, impliedly for its faithful members.
From the year 33 A.D. to the year circa 1517 A.D., there was only one church of God the Son Jesus Christ, now called Catholic Church to distinguish it from many other man-made juridical organizations.
All those who are not members of the Catholic Church headed by Christ are ANTI-CATHOLIC CHURCH and are impliedly ANTI-CHRIST. BE REMINDED THAT IT IS CHRIST WHO WILL COME TO JUDGE THE LIVING AND THE DEAD ON THE LAST JUDGEMENT DAY. (END)”
(Compiled by Jun Densing)
Friend, I disagree.
I was raised in the Catholic Church. My mom was a devout Christian in the Catholic Church. I was baptized at two weeks, and of course first communion and confirmation as well. And thank God through my mother’s introduction to Christ. But I did not know Jesus as my Lord and Saviour till I was 53 . And only by Gods grace and mercy can I call myself a child of God ( I like Man of God now) . I was a functioning addict living in this fallen world. And living for self . I was led by the Holy Spirit to Calvary Baptist church . Where I believe I’m hearing the word (Bible) taught to me the way it should . No Hail Mary, no priest advocating as God the father. Showing up every week, month year and confessing my sins and say 5 Hail Mary. Now I know what true repentance is . I have a direct line to Christ who lives in me now. To help me with my obedience.
The sprinkling of water at two weeks of age is not baptism . Baptism is emersion and testifying your obedience to God before others and accepting Jesus into your life in front of others believes . You should know this as it is written in the early part of the book of John .
Again , I respect the Catholic Church because my Mother was a God fearing , humble , gracious, loving women of faith.
And maybe other denominations as well.
But I am convicted by the Holy Spirit the word , the message I’m being fed through Calvary is the truth, way and life .
I appreciate your thoughts as well , and pray that we can both go and make disciples.
Blessings
The Catholic Church is not part of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. The Apostles, then word of God, which was later written in homes and delivered to the Albigensian people, who were being persecuted by the Catholic Church because they were independent and were not Gnostics. The Bible made its way into Europe, then to the rest of the entire world. English became the dominant language here in 2024 around the world. God does not dwell in a temple made with hands. Jesus says we are the body of Christ, a holy temple. Revelation 17.
Cnaan*
And Darwin turns in his grave pffffffffff........... In the name of Christ so many people have died. If you don't have the evidence you star believing.
ПРИКОЛЬНО
When islam stared in israel
Stale Ads!!!!!
This map has a lot of wrong stuff, like the israelites wandering through Saudi Arabia during the Torah when in reality it was the Sinai peninsula
So we can assume that the bible is full of historical text about real people turned into a fantasy novel ?
th-cam.com/video/LfvTwv5o1Qs/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=CrisVleck
Mitho-historical text with the intention of giving a message about God, ethics, the meaning of life, etc.
@@jcsilva1225 I hope that wasn't a virus or anything
The Bible is the real literal words of God, and since God can't lie, the Bible is truth. This is believed by Christians and Jews and other related religion. Christianity expounds on this by adding the New Testament as well. It is the original Hebrew and Greek texts that are inspired, which is the term used to describe how God wrote the Bible, which is inspiring writers and telling them what to write
@@roastedturtle0820th-cam.com/video/KqSkXmFun14/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Pz6cE--NlDc9WodJ
Oh dear, another Ron Wyatt disciple.
What's wrong with Ron Wyatt's discoveries?
Not one was legitimate.@@learningpeace9788
I hope y'all know these aren't historical, real stories
Why would you say that?
@blusheep2 because i hope people can understand difference biblical traditions and historical facts
@okon7464 But what are you saying isn't historical fact and how do you know. I understand all the criticism about the first few chapters of Genesis, but those chapters don't make up the whole Bible. If there are unattested parts of the Bible, such as the Abraham story, that doesn't mean the stories are false. It just means that we don't have any independent attestation for it.
So what stories aren't historical and how would you know? Why would you say that they aren't historical?
@blusheep2 In the Bible Abraham is from Chaldaean Ur, Chaldaeans werent in Ur till VI century BCE, which means the story was written around VI century BCE, because author had no idea about, he was writing based on information he had.
We have no archeological records for jews being enslaved, no archeological records for conquer of Kanaan, no records for united jewish kingdom of David. These stories just don't fit into the world. I recommend to read Mario Liverani's works
@okon7464 Certainly Ur of the Chaldeans is one of those Biblical references that have confused scholars for some time. That doesn't mean it was written later. One simple option is a scribal update. Where an older unknown city was updated to its modern name so that the readers would understand the story better.
Another possibility mentioned by many scholars is that the Ur that Abraham lived in was the UR in Turkey, and not Babylon. The Hebrew word translated "Chaldeans" has a few other possible translations though they aren't favored. So I think this is a question that still hasn't been satisfactorily answered but it doesn't force the conclusion that the story is a late fabrication.
As for archeological records of Jews being enslaved, this is a bit true and a bit false. What we have records for is Semitic slaves which Jews were a part of that greater group. I could go into more detail but when the Hyksos were kicked out of Egypt, those that couldn't flee as fast as the armies and administration, were enslaved and we know this from the biography of the general that expelled them from Avaris.
Not only that we know from archeology that Avaris, the captial of the Semitic Hyksos dynasty, remained a Semitic city for quite some time following the Hyksos expulsion. We also know archeologically that the city of Avaris became a ghost town in the middle of Rameses II's reign because the people of Pi-Rameses used the entire site as a graveyard. Avaris at its height, held 100,000 people. Its was a gigantic Semitic city. The Hebrews would have been mixed up with this group.
We do have archeological records of the conquest of Canaan. First we have the Mereneptah Stele from the late Bronze Age IIb. This victory stele records Mereneptah's defeat of the Libyans and some cities in Canaan after they rebelled. It mentions the people Israel in the land and brags that Mereneptah put them in their place. The way they are referred to is as a people group and not yet a nation which is exactly what we should be expecting as the conquest had just begun.
At this same time, (Late Bronze IIb and early Iron Age I) it is now agreed that there is a population explosion. Not a reshuffling of the current people. Over 300 new settlements spring up throughout Canaan and they are all Hebrew settlements.
On top of this we have a destruction layer at Hatzor, a city said to have been burned in the conquest, dating to the time of the conquest. As of 2023 we have found the wall of Jericho from the time of the Conquest, as well. Though detractors had been saying for years that there was no city at the time of the conquest, we now have proof that there was. It wasn't detected earlier because their has been a massive amount of site leveling during later periods.
There now is ample evidence of a united kingdom under David and certainly under Solomon. What you said is outdated. We now have found building construction such as the ones at Queiyfa(sp?) during David's reign and the gates of Gezer, Megiddo, and Hatzor that could only have been undertaken if there was a centralized government.
*************************************************
*"The Lord has established His throne in heaven,
And His kingdom rules over all."* -Psalm 103:19
*************************************************
The LORD will restore Israel’s lands and that what makes their neighbours so hostile
هذا ليس رب اسرائيل الحقيقي هذا مجرد شيطان
ربنا نحن المسلمين سوف ينتقم وينتصر من أجل كل المظلومين في العراق وليبيا وسوريا وفلسطين وأفغانستان وفي السودان من الغرب اللعين
😂
Where in the Torah does it say to bomb civillians?
ok but did i ask
Its just a fairy tale
Many historical accounts support what happened in the Bible judges onward,
You can choose to say it isn't real just because it's biblical but that doesn't change its accuracy
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
It is kind of cute to see anyone think there is any historicity in the bible.
It's fun to see someone talk about the Bible without having a clue about it. For example: 1 Kings (3 Kings),
2 Kings (4 Kings), 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles. There are tons of historically confirmed things. You can be atheist and absurdly ignorant at the same time.
You dumb
People are Just dumb, some time they need to believe n something
@@oussamafataicha2987 I hope you tell Muslims the same thing.
I have @@petergianakopoulos4926
😇👍