Eh, it's probably because of how clean the IL-2 is it? Both are as detailed imo, the war thunder one is just in a used condition while the IL-2 one just rolled out of factory.
Warthunder has quantity over quality. There are still some Old models from Birds of Steel/Wings of Prey that are still in Warthunder and lots of hull machine guns still don’t work on the earliest tanks added to wt dispite newer ones having functional machine guns.
warthunder devs try to make it so everyone can play the game which I really respect even if its for money, my pc can only run warthunder and raven field which sucks but it is what it is
@@Lenin_1919 What do you mean? IL Sturmovik was first released 2001, Battle of Stalingrad where the tank gameplay is was released 2013. Tho tank crew gameplay was added a lot later, 2020. The game itself is a lot older than WT.
There's a manual transmission feature too. But it is deliberately turned off to make the game more accessible to all the retards that play WarThunder. Switch to manual transmission in WarThunder and you'll jerk way more than IL-2 because you can't see an RPM dial. Instead you see an RPM number.
@@Buledde I meant it looks like it drives as smooth as having an automatic transmission. In the IL2 comparison you can see it lurch everytime it switches gears (Which I believe you would still see even with a preselector gearbox)
People like to compare WT to WoT and brag about how realistic WT is Then they see a comparison between WT and IL2 and realise how arcadey WT looks lmao
it’s a marketability issue Simulators always have had less of a market compared to the casual counterpart. Less people will get into things they feel completely alienated from. World of tanks is casual, WT is a balance, IL2 is a simulator.
The only reason WT is more popular than IL-2 and WoT is because it targets a broader audience, it offers game modes for people who want a super realistic gameplay (simulator mode in a plane with VR and a cockpit setup) or more arcadey modes like Realistic Battles and Arcade Battles. WoT is only arcadey so it targets only people who like that type of unrealistic gameplay, IL-2 targets the ones who enjoy a much more realistic and accurate gameplay.
Wow. The IL-2's physics and vehicle dynamics are very nice. War Thunder has a 0-28 MPH time of 0.023 seconds. You can actually here the gear and clutching in the IL-2.
For guys wondering. Gajin Does have a semi-full model that has an interior on Tiger H1. However, it's not in War Thunder but in Enlisted. Only reason is they did not use it in War thunder when using driver view because if they decided to fully model it inside. They need to make all of the tanks does that too which is IMO pain in the ass.
5:25 when you show the gunner sight on war Thunder you where using the barrel point of view which is not realistic as you can't see the barrel or the smoke and muzzle flash effects but you can change it on the settings I think it's called "gunner point of view" or something like that Also when playing simulator ground battles in war Thunder the gunner point of view is forced
Honestly, I forgot that you can change it to the more realistic gunsight. But by default, it's set to the gunsight shown in the video, which is what the vast majority of players use.
The suspension physics in WT are to snappy and kinda "toyish." While in IL-2 they really do a good job in simulating the tank exerting force on the track and the tracks reacting to the terrain. IL-2 does a superb job in showing the slack and tension in the tracks as you move foward and backs, side to side. The sound in IL-2 when it comes to firing the cannon in the interior and exterior is great while in WT the sounds is generic to other german tanks. Neither WT nor IL-2 capture the iconic sound of the MG-34. WT is once again generic but better in its audio fidelity and IL-2 is honestly kinda bad you can here it loop. Visually the MG-34 firing in IL-2 is so great I love it ❤. It feels like if you were near that gun when it fires, you're going to get your eye brows singed, but I perfer the heat and smoke effect escaping from the MG-34 from WT. The engine sound - IL-2. Full stop. When it comes to the visual of the tank itself, WT just can't be beat. I believe that they scanned Tiger-131 if I am not mistaken? The visuals are great.
war thunder needs an overhaul of all ground forces movement. it was cutting edge in 2013, but the vehicles all glide around like sticks of butter, with what can only be described as a CVT transmission. the track physics were halfway implemented more recently- slack tracks work correctly, but the devs decided no one would notice if the tension on the sprocket wasn't correct, and it's extremely dissapointing. even WoT has this feature. not to mention, War Thunder's tanks are in absurdly poor condition, especially the older models (they use a mishmash of 2013 models to 2024- when a tank has been added, they never return to it, ever again, and you can see the quality difference between something like the Tiger II P and the Kungstiger) to be fair, their main point of reference are photos of knocked-out tanks, and the kubinka museum- USSR is the only country that would tolerate half the paint being missing on the roof and engine deck. The engine sounds are fairly accurate, but it's painfully obvious with both that there is no "load" on the engine- the vehicles they recorded from were simply being revved in neutral, and comparing it to Battlefield V makes it clear just how bad it is. but of course, War Thunder is never going to change anything, since all their playerbase cares about is the latest top tier tank or air-to-air missile)
@@TheJohn_Highway it's not marketing itself as a simulator, it markets itself as a vehicular combat game, because that's what it is. White it could be a simulator it would break its uniqueness and a lot of players are not interested in that type of gameplay + the grinding that war thunder is known for. Again, it's just a game, play whatever you find fun
Very good, I could continue with this type of video making comparisons with the panzers III and IV, Stugs, Panther and Ferdinads and the Russian tanks such as the T-34, Su 122, Su 152, Isu 152 and KV-1 and if I'm not mistaken there are even Shermans and Churchills. One thing I've always liked about the Il-2 is seeing the inside of the tank and I think it will be interesting see these comparisons with War Thunder. Very good video indeed.
how so? it's pixellated and low-quality, not to mention the actual condition of the tank is abysmal- the wear on the paint makes it seem as though it hasn't been painted or washed since it left the factory, it's ridiculous. especially for a german tank, which were always kept in as good of physical and mechanical condition as possible, and frequently painted in camoflauge to match their location, with every operation they took part of
@alastarrio A tank only remains in "new" condition for a VERY short time....during a actual war, there is no time for touch-ups and a wash and wax. They are machines of war, not showpieces. The smoke animation on Il2 is also a very 2d...maybe another point for WT there. The tanks on il2 looks factory fresh..not the war machines that has been through the punishment of constant use and abuse.
@@pieterreynders5607 lol nah, i prefer the model in IL-2. War Thunder models on most vehicles are outdated. They over exaggerated the condiction of their vehicle models like too much rust, scratches, mud and all the unecessary effects. The textures in general are outdated with lower quality and faded color. That is why when they updated old vehicles with HD model you won't find those effects on them because even the devs knew it looks terrible. Also in war thunder there is a mechanic that make a vehicle get dirtier the more you drive around in the map with it so it is unnecessary to make fake effects on the vehicle instead of it being factory new.
@@pieterreynders5607there actually is a LOT of time for wash and wax Usually the first thing tank crews would do once they had a break was to inspect and clean the tank War is not just non-stop combat
@pe5tulu9l_c_peh-tb91 I'm referring to the custom sights added in game. Some of them from certain vehicles (ex: there is an M1 Abrams sight). Go to: Options, Ground vehicle Battle Settings, Sight settings I know that there are no WW2 era sights in the selection as of now, but that doesn't mean there won't be in the future
You can enable it in the options that the gunner sight is where it is on the real tank, and the sights you can mod in yourself there is no problem in that
War Thunder looks incredibly outdated. The model textures are faded and way too many scratches, rust and mud on the vehicle in an attempt to make it looks realistic but it just look bad imo. Also i love the vehicle movement in IL-2 on uneven grounds made the tank roll side to side while in war thunder the tank just drove smoothly like the whole ground is flattened and it look boring, soulless and weightless. Not to mention the suspensions, wheels and tracks physics in IL-2 are so satisfying to watch. OVerall War Thunder is a very old game, the graphics has weak color grading and vehicle physics barely get updated.
Btw, War Thunder textures looks looks better bcause it's more detailed (scraps, burned paint, etc). But overral model render is way more progressive and realistic in IL-2 (more texture resolution and way smaller and thinner 3d details). I mean WT Tiger looks like it is 70 years old, IL-2 Tiger looks like it's brand new, ready for slay, just like it was in 1940s.
In IL-2 technique looks, and sounds “brighter”. in War Thunder the same sounds are monotonous. the same Tiger, the sound of the transition between speed shifts, physics, in WT tank as on rails rides. in WT task to rivet clones of equipment for the arcade, in IL-2 initially it is a simulator and the developer retains the style of the simulator.
That's a nice video. Only I would separate the machine gun firing and main gun firing, instead of showing it all at once. PS: The sound of the machine gun in IL-2 is terrible .🤪
The one thing I don’t like about war thunder is how every shot emits a massive fireball, especially when you get to high tier auto cannons and chain guns. A lot of the time when you shoot, you just see white and grey smoke
Разработчики грома войны, некогда давно работали в 1С представляя Ил-2 штурмовик. Графика игр идентична, посмотрите ранние видео когда только ввели танки в игру gaijin.
I wish WT simulator battles were like the IL2 battles, with all the views and realism. The thing is that gaijin has something very similar in Enlisted.
You didnt show the actual 3D inerior on il2, nor the realistic prismatic periscope, or the crew animation, some and fire. It really shows with trackIR /VR
IL-2 by far has a better modelled Tanks in General, I honestly prefer IL-2's exterior model compared to War Thunder (with only a couple changes I could see making it even better). War Thunder definitely does the Main Gun and Machinegun sounds better, But if they could replace some of the Machinegun sounds and Main gun sounds with Red Orchestra 2 onto the IL-2's model of the Tiger it would be near perfect to me. I was always looking to Add RO2's sounds into War Thunder.
3D Model both good Suspension both good Engine sound its a 50/50. combine both sounds, could be sound more nice Maingun 50/50. WarThunder messes gunsounds sometimes up. May be combine them MG sound. WarThunder 3D Model inside. 100% IL2
That's not the high-res version of War Thunder, gotta download the better textures for a better comparison. Also noticed that the graphics aren't all the way turned up with those gnarly mip mapping issues. ^^ IL-2 looks really cool, tho the textures are a bit too crisp to look realistic.
IL is a simulator. War Thunder is just an online game. Anyway, i just wanted to say that World of Tanks has similar track physics as IL. Too bad the rest of the game sucks.
IL-2's track physics look really impressive, really satisfying
Только вот играть в неё никто не хочет.
физика там одинаковая. в Тундре реализована твердость грунта, а ИЛ-2 земля твердая как камень
@@MrKassiuskley not the track tension making it loose at the top
@@redstar0001
Terrible controls and overpriced game with anti-consumer practices (overpriced DLC for every good unit). Of course nobody plays it.
@@TheJohn_Highway War Thunder? Yes
War thunder has a more detailed texture, however I highly appreciate the more historical camouflage approach by IL-2.
IL2 also includes a fully modelled interior with animated and moving parts inside
I actually like the slightly Matte colouring of il2
It is closer to how tanks are out the factory or restorated
Eh, it's probably because of how clean the IL-2 is it? Both are as detailed imo, the war thunder one is just in a used condition while the IL-2 one just rolled out of factory.
il2 having a modelled interior and multicrew already wins by a long shot. Doesn't mean war thunder is a bad game, I love it and play both games
Warthunder has quantity over quality. There are still some Old models from Birds of Steel/Wings of Prey that are still in Warthunder and lots of hull machine guns still don’t work on the earliest tanks added to wt dispite newer ones having functional machine guns.
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 And WT is much older, was released in 2014
warthunder devs try to make it so everyone can play the game which I really respect even if its for money, my pc can only run warthunder and raven field which sucks but it is what it is
@@Lenin_19192013
@@Lenin_1919 What do you mean? IL Sturmovik was first released 2001, Battle of Stalingrad where the tank gameplay is was released 2013. Tho tank crew gameplay was added a lot later, 2020. The game itself is a lot older than WT.
War Thunder makes it look like it has an automatic transmission lmao
All I hear is one long continuous roar, im questioning if it even has more gears LOL
There's a manual transmission feature too. But it is deliberately turned off to make the game more accessible to all the retards that play WarThunder. Switch to manual transmission in WarThunder and you'll jerk way more than IL-2 because you can't see an RPM dial. Instead you see an RPM number.
The Tiger had a preselector gearbox( semi-automatic). You probably meant it sounds like a cft transmission.
@@Buledde I meant it looks like it drives as smooth as having an automatic transmission. In the IL2 comparison you can see it lurch everytime it switches gears (Which I believe you would still see even with a preselector gearbox)
It has a proper torque converter.
I love Il-2s interior main gun fire sound
People like to compare WT to WoT and brag about how realistic WT is
Then they see a comparison between WT and IL2 and realise how arcadey WT looks lmao
it’s a marketability issue
Simulators always have had less of a market compared to the casual counterpart. Less people will get into things they feel completely alienated from.
World of tanks is casual, WT is a balance, IL2 is a simulator.
@@anonimosu7425 Ignoring the wt physics engine is stupid
If you think wt is in the arcade style, you are a complete idiot because both games get the same source.
The only reason WT is more popular than IL-2 and WoT is because it targets a broader audience, it offers game modes for people who want a super realistic gameplay (simulator mode in a plane with VR and a cockpit setup) or more arcadey modes like Realistic Battles and Arcade Battles.
WoT is only arcadey so it targets only people who like that type of unrealistic gameplay, IL-2 targets the ones who enjoy a much more realistic and accurate gameplay.
In IL-2 the tanks look like they just left the factory, while in War Thunder the visual detail is more faithful to a war context.
Wild how well IL-2 holds up
7:58 "Tanks for watching"- missed oppurtunity
il-2 win just for the interior, just a few of games got it and is very nice the detail in gunsight
Wow. The IL-2's physics and vehicle dynamics are very nice. War Thunder has a 0-28 MPH time of 0.023 seconds. You can actually here the gear and clutching in the IL-2.
5:24 side note for WT, you can enable true gunsight so the view is from the actual gunsight and not from the barrel of the gun.
Where in the setting
@@YounesBoussouar-su7qk Ground Battlesettings, it's like the 3rd or 4th setting from the top
For guys wondering.
Gajin Does have a semi-full model that has an interior on Tiger H1. However, it's not in War Thunder but in Enlisted. Only reason is they did not use it in War thunder when using driver view because if they decided to fully model it inside. They need to make all of the tanks does that too which is IMO pain in the ass.
They can't even be bothered to model bomber aircraft's cockpits lmao, no way in hell they will ever model tank interiors
@@gian.4388 Yeah. Imo it just Increases Storage if they did that lmao. 😂
i love the exhaust backfire in IL2, wish they would add small details like that to wt
Agreed!
5:25 when you show the gunner sight on war Thunder you where using the barrel point of view which is not realistic as you can't see the barrel or the smoke and muzzle flash effects but you can change it on the settings I think it's called "gunner point of view" or something like that
Also when playing simulator ground battles in war Thunder the gunner point of view is forced
In sim battles, the camera is locked to the zoom position (over commander canopy)
@@Valery_Gerasimov I meant when aiming in sim the gunner view is forced instead of the cannon view
@@CXar-25 oh my bad and yeah you're right
Honestly, I forgot that you can change it to the more realistic gunsight. But by default, it's set to the gunsight shown in the video, which is what the vast majority of players use.
In IL-2 the tanks look like they just left the factory, while in War Thunder the visual detail is more faithful to a war context.
Pro Tip: Where you can, compare both with the real one from Bovington
Having seen 131 up close, I think IL2 wins this comparison easily
@@rzr2ffe325 No, doesn't gain anything, they are both equal.
@@GTEtemcanNo?
The suspension physics in WT are to snappy and kinda "toyish." While in IL-2 they really do a good job in simulating the tank exerting force on the track and the tracks reacting to the terrain. IL-2 does a superb job in showing the slack and tension in the tracks as you move foward and backs, side to side.
The sound in IL-2 when it comes to firing the cannon in the interior and exterior is great while in WT the sounds is generic to other german tanks. Neither WT nor IL-2 capture the iconic sound of the MG-34. WT is once again generic but better in its audio fidelity and IL-2 is honestly kinda bad you can here it loop.
Visually the MG-34 firing in IL-2 is so great I love it ❤. It feels like if you were near that gun when it fires, you're going to get your eye brows singed, but I perfer the heat and smoke effect escaping from the MG-34 from WT.
The engine sound - IL-2. Full stop.
When it comes to the visual of the tank itself, WT just can't be beat. I believe that they scanned Tiger-131 if I am not mistaken? The visuals are great.
The MG34 sound in IL2 is probably my only complaint about the tank
one of war thunder's weaknesses has always been the sound.
war thunder needs an overhaul of all ground forces movement. it was cutting edge in 2013, but the vehicles all glide around like sticks of butter, with what can only be described as a CVT transmission. the track physics were halfway implemented more recently- slack tracks work correctly, but the devs decided no one would notice if the tension on the sprocket wasn't correct, and it's extremely dissapointing. even WoT has this feature. not to mention, War Thunder's tanks are in absurdly poor condition, especially the older models (they use a mishmash of 2013 models to 2024- when a tank has been added, they never return to it, ever again, and you can see the quality difference between something like the Tiger II P and the Kungstiger) to be fair, their main point of reference are photos of knocked-out tanks, and the kubinka museum- USSR is the only country that would tolerate half the paint being missing on the roof and engine deck. The engine sounds are fairly accurate, but it's painfully obvious with both that there is no "load" on the engine- the vehicles they recorded from were simply being revved in neutral, and comparing it to Battlefield V makes it clear just how bad it is. but of course, War Thunder is never going to change anything, since all their playerbase cares about is the latest top tier tank or air-to-air missile)
its just a game its not that deep
@@meowsi5138
It's a game marketing itself as a simulator, when in reality it is arcade trash
@@TheJohn_Highway it's not marketing itself as a simulator, it markets itself as a vehicular combat game, because that's what it is.
White it could be a simulator it would break its uniqueness and a lot of players are not interested in that type of gameplay + the grinding that war thunder is known for.
Again, it's just a game, play whatever you find fun
I would select the IL 2 version.
Love the physics on the driver grabbing gears in the IL-2 version.
War Thunders Tiger H1 Model is looking it was entered so much battles and become rusty or dirty but IL 2's Model is like new produced.
Very good, I could continue with this type of video making comparisons with the panzers III and IV, Stugs, Panther and Ferdinads and the Russian tanks such as the T-34, Su 122, Su 152, Isu 152 and KV-1 and if I'm not mistaken there are even Shermans and Churchills. One thing I've always liked about the Il-2 is seeing the inside of the tank and I think it will be interesting see these comparisons with War Thunder. Very good video indeed.
Man back when Ground Forces first released the Tiger H1 was an *experience*
Only on the external model skin does WT gain 1 point....everything else is a win for IL2!
how so? it's pixellated and low-quality, not to mention the actual condition of the tank is abysmal- the wear on the paint makes it seem as though it hasn't been painted or washed since it left the factory, it's ridiculous. especially for a german tank, which were always kept in as good of physical and mechanical condition as possible, and frequently painted in camoflauge to match their location, with every operation they took part of
@alastarrio A tank only remains in "new" condition for a VERY short time....during a actual war, there is no time for touch-ups and a wash and wax. They are machines of war, not showpieces. The smoke animation on Il2 is also a very 2d...maybe another point for WT there. The tanks on il2 looks factory fresh..not the war machines that has been through the punishment of constant use and abuse.
@@pieterreynders5607
lol nah, i prefer the model in IL-2. War Thunder models on most vehicles are outdated. They over exaggerated the condiction of their vehicle models like too much rust, scratches, mud and all the unecessary effects. The textures in general are outdated with lower quality and faded color. That is why when they updated old vehicles with HD model you won't find those effects on them because even the devs knew it looks terrible.
Also in war thunder there is a mechanic that make a vehicle get dirtier the more you drive around in the map with it so it is unnecessary to make fake effects on the vehicle instead of it being factory new.
@i_nameless_i-jgsdf True....starting off with a "broken" vehicle is actually sad!
@@pieterreynders5607there actually is a LOT of time for wash and wax
Usually the first thing tank crews would do once they had a break was to inspect and clean the tank
War is not just non-stop combat
The fact IL2 has interiors makes it 1000 times better already
What war thunder sim battles wish they were
I hope Gaijin natively adds historical gun sights. I play on console so I can't use gunsight mods.
I'm pretty sure they already added a few (mostly for MBTs, though)
@@corsola9907 Well, I'm not at top tier sooooo.
@@corsola9907nah they didn't
@pe5tulu9l_c_peh-tb91 I'm referring to the custom sights added in game. Some of them from certain vehicles (ex: there is an M1 Abrams sight).
Go to: Options, Ground vehicle Battle Settings, Sight settings
I know that there are no WW2 era sights in the selection as of now, but that doesn't mean there won't be in the future
You can enable it in the options that the gunner sight is where it is on the real tank, and the sights you can mod in yourself there is no problem in that
Compare high-tier WT MBTs with their Gunner HEAT PC equivalents
WT has some tanks that have similar quality track physics (T55, etc) , I don’t know why they don’t put it on all the other tanks
It’s much work look at how many tanks they have
WT is a fair between realism and gameplay. A halfway between IL2 and WoT.
In IL-2 the tanks look like they just left the factory, while in War Thunder the visual detail is more faithful to a war context.
@@MetalBird. IL-2 Is better in every other way in terms of realism
War Thunder looks incredibly outdated.
The model textures are faded and way too many scratches, rust and mud on the vehicle in an attempt to make it looks realistic but it just look bad imo. Also i love the vehicle movement in IL-2 on uneven grounds made the tank roll side to side while in war thunder the tank just drove smoothly like the whole ground is flattened and it look boring, soulless and weightless.
Not to mention the suspensions, wheels and tracks physics in IL-2 are so satisfying to watch. OVerall War Thunder is a very old game, the graphics has weak color grading and vehicle physics barely get updated.
Btw, War Thunder textures looks looks better bcause it's more detailed (scraps, burned paint, etc).
But overral model render is way more progressive and realistic in IL-2 (more texture resolution and way smaller and thinner 3d details).
I mean WT Tiger looks like it is 70 years old, IL-2 Tiger looks like it's brand new, ready for slay, just like it was in 1940s.
In case that WT has hundreds of different tech models, so it's still impressive
In IL-2 technique looks, and sounds “brighter”. in War Thunder the same sounds are monotonous. the same Tiger, the sound of the transition between speed shifts, physics, in WT tank as on rails rides. in WT task to rivet clones of equipment for the arcade, in IL-2 initially it is a simulator and the developer retains the style of the simulator.
both are the best. Each has strong and sick sides, but in any case during playing it's not important.
That's a nice video. Only I would separate the machine gun firing and main gun firing, instead of showing it all at once.
PS: The sound of the machine gun in IL-2 is terrible .🤪
Yup I know.
I separated them in my Sherman comparison video.
The one thing I don’t like about war thunder is how every shot emits a massive fireball, especially when you get to high tier auto cannons and chain guns. A lot of the time when you shoot, you just see white and grey smoke
il 2? This is the first time I've heard about such a game 😮
Разработчики грома войны, некогда давно работали в 1С представляя Ил-2 штурмовик. Графика игр идентична, посмотрите ранние видео когда только ввели танки в игру gaijin.
IL2 - sim, WT arcade. No more words
Wthunder graphics+IL2 physics👍🏼
War thunder graphics + il2 realism
I always feel like modern games are such a downgrade compared to the older ones that focused more on detail. Just like GTA 4 and 5.
I wish WT simulator battles were like the IL2 battles, with all the views and realism. The thing is that gaijin has something very similar in Enlisted.
War Thunder is a multiplayer focused game not everything can be realistic, il2 is a strict historical accurate game with don’t cut corners anywhere.
Как по мне танки в бой должны выходить в идеальном состоянии, а все царапины уже в ходе боя получают
You forget that War Thunder is a spin off of IL-2
Should've turned on the gun view on gunner sight for war thunder for much similar comparison
Yeah, I forgot. But I did for my Sherman video and will for my future videos!
WT needs to take notes
i like IL-2s Smoke actually feels realistic
IL-2 somehow is better. 🤩
If only they both have working project together to makes the games better, ut would be perfect 👌
Good video!
The Il-2 seems to be under the snail's wing too
What do you mean?
Are we comparing an Arcade game to an actual simulator LOL? I play both, but I am here for it!
Зато в ИЛ 2 нету политического перекоса, который есть в ВарТандере.
i just readed tanks for watching :D
You didnt show the actual 3D inerior on il2, nor the realistic prismatic periscope, or the crew animation, some and fire. It really shows with trackIR /VR
The track physics part was kind of unfair since WTs cam is locked onto the Tiger, while IL-2 isnt
IL2 has better track physics regardless
@@GiorgioChiellini723 nah, lol, WT ULQ more better than MGQ it iL-2
@kpadanger5311 ULQ? MGQ?
@@GiorgioChiellini723 im not talking about track physics, I'm talking about how the tiger bounces around
Very good video
IL-2 by far has a better modelled Tanks in General, I honestly prefer IL-2's exterior model compared to War Thunder (with only a couple changes I could see making it even better). War Thunder definitely does the Main Gun and Machinegun sounds better, But if they could replace some of the Machinegun sounds and Main gun sounds with Red Orchestra 2 onto the IL-2's model of the Tiger it would be near perfect to me. I was always looking to Add RO2's sounds into War Thunder.
Warthunder runs on XBox SeriesX and IL-2 Tank crew didn't😅🖖
I like Warthunder on Series so much🤩👍
Solid video.
Can you Compare some WT tanks with CTA Gate of Hell
Very cool 👍👍
3D Model both good
Suspension both good
Engine sound its a 50/50. combine both sounds, could be sound more nice
Maingun 50/50. WarThunder messes gunsounds sometimes up. May be combine them
MG sound. WarThunder
3D Model inside. 100% IL2
IL-2 ❤
Hmmm ...more accurate comparison will be between tanks from Enlisted and Il-2, i think.
Enlisted is more of an infantry combat game, IL2 and WT are vehicle only games
Maybe IL-2 is a good game. Only no one plays it, it's dead. If only you cooperate with friends. And besides, it is very expensive.
IL-2 is by far the best
In IL-2 the tanks look like they just left the factory, while in War Thunder the visual detail is more faithful to a war context.
Var Thunder excels in dubbing the voices of the crew and the external part of the vehicle model. Otherwise, I like IL-2 better
IL2 also has crew voices and is better IMO. Not sure why they're not in the video I guess he muted them
That's not the high-res version of War Thunder, gotta download the better textures for a better comparison. Also noticed that the graphics aren't all the way turned up with those gnarly mip mapping issues. ^^
IL-2 looks really cool, tho the textures are a bit too crisp to look realistic.
I have full ultra HQ installed (both planes and tanks)
The graphics are maxed out (excluding SSAA)
The oil dip stick in war thunder is a lot more realistic than the dip stick in Il-2. But who cares?
IL-2 main gun sounds much better
I wonder if work of tanks pc borrowed the track physics from il2 lol
Every.Single.Thing. Is better in IL-2... Arcade shooter WT doesn't compare to simulator IL-2.
Can someone show this to Gaijin 💀 we need this update for WT
please compare war tunder to red orchestra 2
One is a limitation and other is literally simulation
In IL-2 the tanks look like they just left the factory, while in War Thunder the visual detail is more faithful to a war context.
IL-2 Nr.1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe you need try out Enlisted beacause Warthunder of terrain is too flat
IL-2 is the best
Who wins? Comment.
For war thunder, press 1
To IL, press 2
I think WT had better tank fysics when tanks came to WT 🤔 now its just so arcade.
IL2 BESTT
IL is a simulator. War Thunder is just an online game. Anyway, i just wanted to say that World of Tanks has similar track physics as IL. Too bad the rest of the game sucks.
Song?
Behind the Enemy Lines - War Thunder Soundtrack
How to get driver view in warthunder
Go to controls then ground vehicles. Under camera control, you'll find it. (Or search up "Driver Camera" in the search menu)
look in control, there is keybind for it, by default it unbinded
Fart Thunder
P2W Thunder
generic war thunder hater
yus, war thunder damaged ;.(
@@manfredvonrichthofen1660 P2S
@@democracy_enjoyer womp womp
IL2 is a simulator, war thunder is not.
Now, compare graphics
Bad for War Thunder
why does the modern war thunder looks like cs go with tanks...
feels soo...arcade
Aren't both games made by the same parent company?
No, the newest IL2 was created by 1C.
ATTACK THE D POINT
both are great looking but war thunder is free to play
Free to play...
Il2 is better
Wt could have better terrain and phisic
this 2 games made by gaijin
Gaijin didn't make IL2 Tank Crew
No it's not lol
War thunder 😎
why is this a $80 game?
Because it's a simulator.
But when on sale, it's only $20!
You can't compare a real sim with a sim wannabe bro...
War thunder really
Warthunder cant even get crew sizes or pen values correct.