2022 Suzuki GSX S1000 GT+ Review - Have Suzuki Made Its Best Sport-Touring Bike Yet?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ค. 2022
- Criticize Suzuki all you want for recycling the K5 GSX-R1000 engine over and over again, but when something works, why change it? Instead of wasting time and money developing a new engine, Suzuki poured its energy into making one hell of a sport-touring bike - the 2022 GSX-S1000GT+. Boasting bodywork and wind protection developed in the wind tunnel, a comfortable seating position, big saddlebags, some must-have electronics - and yes, that awesome engine - Suzuki might have outdone themselves this time.
Read the full written review here: www.motorcycle.com/features/2...
Subscribe!
th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
TH-cam - / motorcycle
Facebook - / motorcyclecom
Twitter - / motorcyclecom
Web - www.Motorcycle.com
Established in 1994, Motorcycle.com is the premier online resource for motorcycle and scooter enthusiasts. With hundreds of high quality, detailed video reviews on bikes from Harley-Davidson, Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki and just about everybody else, it's the best place to go to learn about the latest and greatest two-wheeled creations. There's simply no better resource if you're planning on buying or if you just want to check out some awesome machines. - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
It's so good to see a new sports tourer that isn't styled like an adv bike.
Just a shame they styled it a lot like the kawasaki
@@everythinggaming7938 I see Yamaha in the front end, but otherwise I think it's a very good looking bike.
@@1MrBryn its a good looking bike regardless of it looking like its competitor would of been nice to have different style tho
I've ridden both Kawasaki SX and the Versys 1000 and I'll take the Versys every time - it's way more comfortable.
Amen
I like how Suzuki is able to do more with less. Some manufacturers are a little over the top on features, and Suzuki might not be the most flashy right now, but they keep doing things their own way. I like it.
And they are exiting MOTOGP cuz of the financial problems... They need to update their lineup or they are done.
@@CptSlow89 Agree.
Their sales are down yet again, and they seem content with giving us parts bins bikes. The can't even supply bikes to Australian dealers, pull out of Moto GP after commiting through to 2026 .
I've got a feeling Suzuki is in major trouble, and it sucks because I still remember when they were a major player.
@@GPz84 this could be a time where they make some great bikes….by taking what they have and making something new….the future will tell us, but I could see myself on THIS bike….and I’m a cruiser guy!
Idk why people would complain that an engine is used in other bikes. The more of the same engines made, the larger the pool of parts for them now and in the future.
A lot of people hate not having exclusivity and constantly changing/updating parts. The Dodge Challenger and Nissan GTR are excellent examples that people love to hate on for not changing much. Those that like them keep buying them in droves despite not changing much over the last fifteen years. Personally I like it when vehicles maintain a design and just update necessary parts rather than constantly redesigning from ground up. I think Chevrolet was one of the best at this for a long time. Their 5.3 and 6.0 motors were used in everything they sold. Parts are plentiful
Thank you for your review of this bike. It was the final deciding factor for buying it. You made a few comments that need correction that will help sell the bike. First off, the front brakes. They are mushy, but not because of the master cylinder or rubber lines, but because Suzuki and Brembo chose to put very weak brake pads on the bike. After changing the pads to an after market pad which is basically the one used for the GSXR-1000, the front brake is perfect for an agressive sport tourer. 1/4 pull vs. all the way to the handlebars, with plenty of feel. Next, the stock tires suck. Price them out and you will see they are the least expensive tires you can buy for this bike. Switched to a real sport touring tire (Michelin Road 5GT) and now we have feel, confidence, and a tire that was built to last many many miles (twice the price, but well worth it). Finally, your evaluation of the seat is spot on in terms of lack of comfort, but your explanation is exactly the opposite of why it is so uncomfortable. It is way too soft on the sides of the seat, causing your tailbone to sink in and basically roast your privates. The inexpensive "optional style seat" for $189 is a world of improvement and takes the bike from a 1 hour and rest to an all-day sport tourer. For the minor upgrades the bike is a steal. Also, don't waste your time on the "suzuki touring windscreen". It just redirects the wind onto your torso, and actually creates additional helmet buffeting. Stock screen is acceptable with a high quality helmet, and maybe some music. The aftermarket will catch up eventually and create something a little better. The saddle bags are HUGE, as they have no pipe restriction, and easily become luggage for a trip. TFT screen is incredibly visible. Best I've ever used. Clear and bright day or night. Power and handling are just right. Pulls right off the bottom like a V twin. Quite a surprise compared to the naked version. Rev's to the moon. Buy it, you will like it.
I may be late to the party but thanks for your input , it has really helped me out especially with the seat part. Thanks
sounds like you'd be better off buying a finished bike right off the bat, instead of spending all that time and money buying and wrenching.
@@Supernova12034 95% of stock bikes come with trash tires, nothing new. And pads and seat will cost you $200 and half an hour if you're not mechanically inept, hardly a major hurdle lol
@@rarekid740Evidently not the ninja 1000
@@Supernova12034yeah but the kawi is ugly haha nah nah jk they are all sweet I just don't like the look of the kawi
People seem to forget that the K5/6 GSXR1000 chassis is god tier. Still holding the world's fastest 0-60 for any OEM motorcycle (yes, faster than the H2), and won multiple championships.
Through and through, it is nearly impossible at least without spending insane money, to outperform what they've already made. Can't blame them! The legend speaks for itself.
Don't fix or change whats not broken and with what works! Test of time is the best! Reliability and performance.
I just bought the Hayabusa & it’s awesome & underrated. It’s powerful yet comfortable, reliable with all the tech. Bless Suzuki. Ive had a Ducati Diavel, BMW GS 1200 , Kawasaki concourse & now this bike. This has climbed up on my list. It’s lighter & nimbler & as powerful or more & smoother. The QS is butter smooth, way creamier than the GS’s . I’m never off roading on my touring bike’s so the Adventure bikes don’t make sense to me.
Your posture adjusts after awhile but you can’t blast unless you are leaned . I hope to enjoy this bike for the next 10 years.
I test road one today and I bought it. Can't wait until it comes.
Really hoping manufacturers keep releasing sport touring motos. Definitely looking to add one to the stable soon and the more to choose from the merrier.
Sport Touring class is coming back! Well done Suzuki
I love ST's, despise ADVs, so I'm glad to see the Ninja 1000 has an honest competitor. This GSX S1000 GT looks like a winner. Solid review!
Don't forget about the 1290 SD GT, granted it's more money
I dont know why critisizing the base of this motor. I really dont care if its a K5 engine. All the eletronics and power delivery was specially made for this bike. Is this really a problem?
I have the Gsxs750 with the K5 motor and it’s a fantastic machine.
@@monkeyCmonkeyDoo
He says he likes this Motor. It really works. No criticizing.
@@monkeyCmonkeyDoo Wish Honda would just stick the engine from the 08 Fireblade on the CB1000R
@@monkeyCmonkeyDoo You could say the same about the Ninja 1000SX. It only has 140 hp like the Honda. It is derived from the Z1000, an old ass outdated naked bike.
@@spoonman73 Only 140 HP. Spoken like a true squid.
Actually it's 142 HP, so that means the Suzuki has a whopping 8 HP more.
The Suzuki is geared way too short and is too high strung. The 1000SX, the bike Suzuki obviously tried to clone, just look at the fairing, is torquey all through the midrange and has plenty of get up and go. It's better suited for its purpose unlike the parts bin Suzuki which looks cheap in person. But hey, people love the Suzuki's swingarm, because we all know that makes it a better bike.
The Suzuki is a great first attempt, but falls short of the 1000SX.
Suzuki's road bikes are great and idgaf what anyone says. Let them keep stretching that engine out in the 600, 750's, and 1000's. Something about their I4 just feels good to ride.
Suzuki bikes are "Ace" period.
best review i have seen on this bike - thx - i just bought one
I'd say I want it just because it's a K5 based engine. As a young man I rode a k5 gixxer and the motor was awesome. A lot of guys that are older now still remember how good those engines were!
I love continuity from manufacturers. Updating and adding minimal features is great. Constant redesigns and a hundred different engines is annoying. I don’t see an issue with using the same engine in multiple platforms. When it works it works. Even down to little parts it makes sense to me. Good example is Toyota. They have been using the exact same cruise control lever in all of their vehicles for more than 20 years. My wife’s 2020 CHR uses it. Our old 18 4Runner used it. My old 06 Tacoma and 99 Tacoma used it. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.
I mean, arguably, the K5 is one of the best super sport engines ever
As previously stated, I hope other manufacturers produce some SPORT-touring motorcycles, I am not a big fan of the Adventure touring style bikes, so Suzuki gets a big thumbs up from me.
Economy of scales is a big factor with manufacturing so getting more mileage out the the K5 powerplant, works if it works and apparently it does.
What bugs me is the cyclopes headlight set up...
I wish Triumph would bring back their Sprint ST (not the GT) from the 2005-2010 era based on the new the Speed Triple. It wouldn't take much and would fill in their lineup.
The Sprint ST was superb, agreed. What do you ride these days?
I got a Tracer 9 GT, but I like this a lot
Great bike, yet another very positive review...now try to find one! The wait at local dealers is "somewhere around 3-4 months, maybe" (direct quote). Maybe I can get one in the dead of winter! For the price, complaints about no IMU, no drive shaft, no heated grips are a bit ridiculous. The nannies are more than good enough, chains/lube are so much better today and lighter/cheaper, and heated grips are optional. Just ride the thing!
Great review!
Beautiful work of art.
Finally.. this beast can replace all my beautiful memories with my previous z1000sx
This is what I always thought sport tourers should be. Basically a sport bike with wind protection. Something I can ride from Cleveland to the Dragon, rip a few laps, and ride back. I've done it on my Street Triple, but by half-way back my neck hurts from holding my head in the wind. If you want to ride 2-up or need luggage for several days, get a Goldwing or GS, you'll both be happier.
Now, if they could just sort out the headlights and make the bigger windshield standard.
What is wrong with the headlights? curious cause I may buy the GSX S1000 GT
@@ehiggins7476 They're ugly. And only one of them is the normal headlight, the other is high-beam only, which makes it look broken.
I just purchased one and love the bike. The only problem I have is the seat and for some reason I cannot see well with this headlight. Does anyone else have an issue with the headlight. The low beam has a dark spot from right in front of the bike up to about 15 yards in front of the bike. My '03 Honda XX has better lighting. Any thoughts?
Looks like a great new option in its very small class. Good luck finding one of these on a showroom floor in the US.
Nevermind. It does have cruise control. I missed that at first.
Nothing wrong using that engine. It has been worked on and tweaked for a long time so it's going to be extremely reliable and with the updates it has plenty of power and decent fuel economy as well.
If I didn’t love my Connie 14 so much, I’d get one of these right now
Best selling bike UK , I've got a k6 and seriously looking at this do it all model
sort the headlights so they can both be on and I will have one... got this OCD issue with symmetry.
It's not just you. It's every except the accountant that decided a few pennies needed pinched on making the lights symmetrical.
Now that the touring bike market has been cornered by mid-life crisis executives and their "adventure" bikes, it's really cool that some manufacturers keep doing some sport-touring bikes with some real sport in them. Only this one and the Ninja 1000 as far as I know, I hope they'll sell great so that they keep developping them.
not for freeways though you cant ride at 9000rpm with the buzzing that creates for very long. an in combination with that pitiful useless flyscreen., kawy screen a damn site better but still along with seat on both- must be replaced immediatly.
Bmws S1kXR does it right. But usually they cost more than japanese counterparts.
Considering yamaha has a mt10 which is based off a R1, it's a shame they haven't done the mt09/xsr900/tracer900 gt treatment for the R1. And this from a naked bike fan.
i have the 2023 gt 1000 plus and from day 1 the valves sound loud 800 miles and it seem to be getting louder taken it back 4 times they said it normal what do you think?
GLAD To See No Cartoon Color Wheels.
This could very well be my next bike to do long trips on.
Looks really good, especially at that price. Compare that to a BMW S1000xr (which by the way also gets it's motor from the S1000RR, just like this one from the GSXR) that's about $6k more! Big time Yamaha vibes from the front lights on this, not that that's a bad thing.
The s1000xr is a better bike in every way than this bike. More power, better suspension, better brakes, more safety electronics etc. I do think the Suzuki looks better but that's down to individual preference.
@@sToRmZzr123 and cheap to maintain this bullet proof engine
@@sToRmZzr123 The SXR is a balancershaft-less numb-wrists buzzomatic. And gets flighty at any speed where the marginal additional power gained from ditching the balancer is even noticeable (The S1000RR is awesome, though...). The XR requires a half-frozen, draggy steering head (aka steering damper) in order to perform something as simple as going down the road in a semi straight fashion....
More seriously: Both are good bikes. All new bikes are, and have been for the past two decades. A year or two into ownership, once you're used to each bike's quirks and have had time to remedy the ones you find annoying (say brake pads and tires, and perhaps an aftermarket shock, on the Suzuki if sport/track is a priority), I bet most people will be less annoyed with the GSX-S than the XR. Even if the initially "easier to ride fast" XR may seem more impressive on a short test ride. That's what one meticulous step at time forwards over twenty years; as opposed to 10 steps in all manners of whatever-is-currently-fashionable directions, every single year; almost always end up resulting in. It may be easier to look impressive, on showroom floors and bike reviews, by focusing on hitting every conceivable fashionable bucket list hot-point. But most of the stuff is just chaff. And by distracting from slower, more fundamental, improvements, it ends up ultimately coming up a bit short.
The beauty of almost all Suzukis, is that they don't try to appear to be more than they are. They wear their compromises on their sleeves. Allowing you time to get used to them, then either work around them; or make some mods once you have enough experience with the bike to know more specifically what you miss. While modern BMWs have become the opposite: All manners of electronics and complications allowing for a spectacular facade. But then, over time, the annoyances start being noticed. And those are annoyances which are harder to rectify. Both because they tend to be more fundamental (lack of balancers and stable geometries....), and because the soup of sensors and electronics and other complications, means it becomes almost impossible to change anything, without risking the whole cardhouse crashing down.
@@paulnorman8274 good write up , BMW better until service time £ , BMW holds residues better but only an idiot would buy second hand , Suzuki just work , new shock , fork piston kit , Dyno time don't need exhaust , brake lines all the usual stuff , and it'll out last us , no flaking cams shite switch gear and so on .
They need to bring back the SV1000s. It didn't need a quick shifter, the slipper clutch was fantastic in the SV1000s.
I have tried Suzuki's QS and Kawasaki's. I think I'm just used to the smooth shifting of Suzuki transmissions, because their QS didn't feel much different than clutchless shifting (granted, I haven't ridden aggressively with it). However, I did feel the difference between the Suz QS and Kawa. I'll be surprised if Kawa doesn't update to a system like Suzuki's.
Fantastic memories about that bike. What a pity I had to sell it because I moved to another country. This bike could well replace my sv1000s with ABm high handlebar
Nice review. Could you share what routes you rode in this video? Thanks!
Just a guess, but I'd say CA hwy 58 and/or hwy 33 towards Ojai.
He states in the written article: "...hustling around the tight and curvaceous confines of Highways 33, 58, and 166"
I ride one yesterday...WOW.
I have one GT+ or GTA (with saddle bags & higher screen. I love the engine, the quick shifter, the ergos but it lacks the adjustable screen and the heated grips like on the Ninja 1000 SX SE. Great bike. 🙂
After many hours of research and videos, I decided to place an order for this motorcycle. Got the 2024 GT+ in black. I have a little over 1k miles on it now and it has been absolutely amazing. If I had any complaints it would be the headlight. Why not have both come on for the low beam? Also, the light output could be better for night riding.
That for me though, does not take away from how awesome the bike has been.
Decent looking bike but I prefer my Ninja 1000sx, which compares very favorably to this unit. MCN did a great comparison of the two!
You get more for your $ with the Ninja, and it's engine is a gem. The Suzuki is geared too short and too high strung.
I have had the 2018 ninja 1000sx and I think the Suzuki handles alot better. The Suzuki back then was a bit faster too (GSX-S1000F) The Ninja 1000sx looks alot better though :)
It looks terribly cheap In person the kwak was a much better choice IMO
@@lewigimole Yeah the Ninja 1000 from 2017 and onward looks alot better than the suzuki. I just wish the handlebars on these sporttouring bikes were a bit lower, not like a supersport but like a Bmw S1000R or Aprilia Tuono 1100. To feel a bit more sporty and to be less abused by the wind. I hate sitting straight up like in grandpas chair when I ride :(
@@mathias6423 For hauling tail in canyons and down other twisty roads, the Suzuki is definitely better suited. The NInja is no slouch, though. Certainly not by what has become the current standard for the sport touring genre, ADV bikes.... The Ninja is also calmer, and better suited for both city and motorway riding. But for more serious pace over twisty roads, and especially for track days on "trackday" type tires, the Ninja is not the sort of upright full-on sport bike that he GSX-S is.
i really like the design. when we can expect India launch??
An hydraulic rear preload adjuster would have been nice
Love the whole GSXS line. Can't wait for them to make one that fits us short (5'4") guys. 🤣🤣🤣
you're kidding right? All the sporty, sport touring bikes are made for people under 6' tall. I'm 6'4" and would love to have one of these, but I look like a monkey fucking a football on these little bikes.
I loved my 2016 gsxs but 135whp even with TCS off and -1 +2 was not enough for me at 185lbs 6'1".
As soon as I read the specs I knew this was the bike for me!
Are the handlebar switches backlit for night riding?
Nope. But the arrow button is pretty chunky and the buttons are few, so it's supposed to be easy to get used to without looking.
Some people are complaining about cam chain rattle at low miles. Is that common?
Suzuki is so underrated
Are the saddlebags on the plus model detachable?
Yes, they are.
Originally it added a taller screen I thought but maybe they went with taller one across the both trim levels.
You can get a taller screen it's an add on
Seems like they looked to the current gen R1s front profile for some motivation
I want one
But should I overlook it if I'm looking for sport in sport touring segment and have the base tuono v4 in my eyesight?
If you want sporty Aprilia can't be beat. You pick Japanese over European mostly for reliability.
@@DoctorZisIN reliability is an overrated myth
@@volodymyrshoniia2424 maybe until you are stuck in the middle of nowhere maybe just maybe you may reconsider reliability 😆
@@kaecy6 that sounds more like lack of maintenance 😆
Just buy your tuna already
You get a really nice package for $14k if you go all in. I would easily go out and snag this if I was in the market
I love that compact exhaust. The massive pipes on the Hayabusa or the V-Strom are just too big and ugly.
The cats are packed underneath the bike. The tradeoff is no center stand. Noy a huge deal with modern chains.
I prefer two massive pipes in Hayabusa or a center stand like in ZZR1400, a matter of taste
@@Frost67915 Center stands are nice and practical, but yeah, a matter of taste for sure.
K5 a wonderful engine why change perfection,💝☀️🙂
I have the 18’ gixxis 1000f w/K5 still the busa killer
Busa killer? No....just no.
Is it just me are those headlight + DRL combo very MT-10 looking
The 2005 GSXR’s were the best bikes ever. Of course they would base others off of it.
I had the '03 GSX-R 1000 (my first bike at 35) and it was a straight beast but smooth as butter.
Kinda looks like a bmw tourer from the front but honestly I like the whole look of this bike, it’s kinda timeless
The BMW i4 is also based on the K5.
@@anxiousappliance I'm pretty sure the BMW i4 is electric. And also a car.
@@rightwingsafetysquad9872 inline 4 cylinder engine.
@@anxiousappliance It was a joke.
@@rightwingsafetysquad9872 oh - OK.
Ummm…I thought you said (in the BMW S1000r review) you didn’t like inline 4 engines because they lacked “character” and “soul” or is that only in regards to BMW/non Japanese motorcycles?!?
Speaking of character….
WIND NOISE ... turbulence? Loud? My FJR is deafening.
Clutch in to start?
No one uses clutch to start anymore
@@donaldwiggins7740 You might want to check a DR650 to be sure...and Suzuki's cruisers.
The lack of cornering ABS & TC isn't really a big deal, but the lack of center stand is. It's a touring bike with a chain drive... and you'll have to clean and lube that chain on the road. Why can't some manufacturers get this simple fact? sigh
Coming from a 2017 Versus 650 that doesn't have it, I won't buy my next bike without it.
There's no place to put one on this bike, exhaust system is in the way.
One headlight on….what a stupid idea. Looks lame.
I do like it but... And it's a big but... Is that it is only serious as a 1 up tourer. Poor passenger accommodation and no top box option have seen to that.
Are you doing serious *sport* touring 2 up?
@@TheCdubbleyoo the answer to your question is irrelevant because it it no way alters the truth of my original statement. It is a classic strawman argument.
The GSX-S1000GT+ is already on Corbin's list to create a touring seat with backrest, and probably heating, as soon as they can get their hands on one out in California. The rubber coated passenger grab rails are very likely bolted on, not welded, so we can expect rear top case and passenger support within the year from Shad and GIVI.
No doubt the aftermarket will jump to the rescue. But what one could probably infer if Suzuki doesn't sell a top box option, or offer prodigious passenger comfort in their saddle maybe they are trying to tell you something about their intentions for this bike or advise you of its inherent weaknesses? If they could sell something as an accessory they would. Not to do so makes zero sense commercially. The questions I would ask any dealer would be, Is the rear subframe up to the task of a passenger and top box and/or is stability compromised if both are carried? Sure you could fit an aftermarket luggage topbox and rack.....but the real question is should you? There are so many other sport touring bikes that are able to be fitted with full luggage systems why would l second guess Suzuki's highly paid and more knowledgeable motorcycle engineers effectively jerryriging a retrofit for this bike?
I'm quite sure the aftermarket will solve that issue.
Great engine, yes!
I know you can't bit the price for a sport tourer but electric windshield is not there and I really think that there it is not comfortable for a passenger, the pegs are too high and the pillion seat does not look comfortable enough for long journeys.
I believe that the other contenders in the category ( FJR, RT 1250 etc..) are way ahead in the confort department
Once again, I know the price is lower that the other ones.....
Not for me.
But...you don't know any of those things without actually trying the bike,...do you ?
💙
Oh oh the Kawasaki bug bit Suzuki. Well good!
Troy Siahaan kayak orang Indonesia
It's a great geriatric motorcycle 🏍
😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
Looks like kawasaki h2 sx tourer version.
No topcase offered? What touring are we talking about? Maybe single rider with a duffel bag (no protection from theft).
Suzuki should have made this bike 7-8 years ago. The Tracer 9 has way too much head start
Ninja all day/ same price, an imu and more refined… and lean angle abs
Not the same price with bags, QS has repeatedly been reviewed as a better unit not as high top end.
I still hate that exhaust
No doubt a good motorcycle, but why does it have to look like a platypus?
First thing I would do rip off that ugly CAT underneath.
Well, you probably won't be spending a lot of time looking at it from a low angle... One hours not anyway.
But I think that it looks too much like a Yamaha.
Just don't drive at night.
May as well have not even made it with that dumb chain drive