"He was guilty!" Chris Tarrant reacts to ITV's QUIZ | The Chris Moyles Show | Radio X
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2020
- Chris Tarrant came onto the Chris Moyles show to chat about Quiz, the ITV drama about the infamous Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? scandal with Charles Igham.
Never miss a beat (or riff) by SUBSCRIBING to The Chris Moyles Show On Radio X here: bit.ly/2qqMaxW
Get even deeper into the music by visiting www.radiox.co.uk/
Radio X is the world’s best indie rock radio channel for music news, live performances and interviews with the world’s biggest rockstars.
Watch More Below:
⚫️Best of Chris Moyles: bit.ly/35f9BsL
⚫️New Uploads: bit.ly/2KDwzSG
⚫️The Best Of The Chris Moyles Show: bit.ly/2KyfBVA
⚫️Celebrity Guests: bit.ly/35hosTK - บันเทิง
This is actually Michael Sheen
It sure was
Michael sheen looked like a huge compliment to Tarrant.
Chris Moyles was spot on , Matthew Macfadyen made the character too likeable. I must admit I didn’t like the look of the real Charles Ingram either and he certainly wasn’t likeable. Chris Tarrant was right in that Quiz made you feel that the couple were innocent.
I would go a little bit further than that and say that the drama made it look like Ingram was almost coerced into doing it by his wife which made the audience feel that he was innocent as he was dropped into the scheme, but that she did the whole thing in tandem with her brother. Then the drama around the effects on their family life afterwards such as the kids being bullied and the dog being shot also emphasised the notion of their (or his) innocence.
He was an Army Major for 17 years. I have no problem with him stinging a big corporation out of a small amount. ITV have profited off of other's misery for years.
@@Fireglo innit. f um.
@@Fireglo Kind of shit comment totally missing the point. However if Ingram had got away with it, well different story. The reality is that he was a thicko, well out of his depth and caught, bang to rights.
That’s the problem when a real life event is made into a drama or a film; it never truly reflects on the real story. I agree, the drama does make it look as though he was forced into doing it, but in reality it’s probably a very different story. In my opinion, Charles Ingram was guilty and he wanted to cheat just as much as his wife wanted him to.
I agree with everything Chris Tarrant said! Of course he was guilty of that fraud and the insurance fraud. It was a brilliant mini-series but didn't portray the guilty rogues in the correct light
I know, like chris said it was a drama first and foremost and it's clear they wanted you to be on the major's side but overal, like chris said, they should of A included the coughs on some of the questions that were not included and b brought up Major Ingram's inssurence troubles.
the defense lawyer made them seem innocent in the tv show
Sure he can look guilty when you edit out 192 coughs and only leave ones that occurred before the answer.
alegria barofka The only thing that was incorrect was when the insurance fraud happened. Didn’t it happen after Millionaire Fraud and not before.
@@bobo577 It didn't go to court until after the show. That's when he got kicked out of the regiment - because it was his second fraud.
I agree with everything said here. The drama made Charles Ingram out to be some afible and gullible idiot that was somehow drawn into cheating, to as far as to making it look like the Ingram's etc were somehow hard done by by being found guilty, but the truth is, they all knew exactly what they were doing.
The verdict of all of them being found guilty doesn't tally with how the Ingram's were painted in the drama, which seems all the more baffling given that the drama was commissioned by ITV.
I also found it really bizarre how all the ITV executives were portrayed as cartoonish buffoons running around like headless chickens.
@@shelbyvillerules9962 A strange portrayals of both Ingram's and producers like you say, given the drama was an ITV production.
@@SpartasEdgeI suspect the issue, in order to produce the series and not have it locked down by a libel lawsuit, was that the Ingrams were confidentially shown the show while it was being produced and had a signoff on it, under NDA. Charles tweeted about the show after its first episode, calling it fair and balanced or whatever. I think they had a signoff on it which means it was basically trying to tell the story while painting a glorified revision of them. I think that's why it opens with that weird quotation at the start of the first episode, I think that was a hint about the situation.
Of course, the Weakest Link producers once invited them on for a celebrity special. Could be a choice to embrace them like that by cynical producers. I never liked Weakest Link, anyway.
Chris says ‘british army major’ the exact same way he said it on the show in 2001 hahaha
He went on The Weakest Link, and Channel 4's Wife Swap afterwards too 😂😂
I'm 40 .... chris is a LEGEND !!!!
Both of em 👍
Listened to the whole thing live fing brilliant
After the final episode finished, I did say to my family. Well that makes me think now that he's innocent. Although he obviously wasn't and What Chris said about Matthew McFadyen is so true he is so much more likable than Charles in real life. Quiz could have done with another court episode about the prosecution.
@!? You never see an old man eating a twix
@!? It would be spiteful to put jellyfish in a trifle
@!? People who live in glass houses have to answer 🧐
@!? Oven!
@!? All I had for company was a calculator
Chris, Dom and Toby have a lot to answer for... I am in the dog house for continuously doing the Chris Tarrant noises around the house
lol Charles and his wife I used to see walking around near where I live and every time people would see him there would be people coughing on purpose when going near him. Oh boy how times changes, for one I don't see him round here no more and 2 you'd be arrested for on purposely coughing near people at this time xD.
what the hell! chris moyles looks great! used to listen to him back in the radio one days x
Miss Wilcox are you under 35?
@@stevechristie2569 yes i am!
@@stevechristie2569 are you fit?
@@nicolawilcox9771 I am someone who goes through an amazing change when I switch from couchpotato lifestyle to active: I go from a 5 to a 9. People gasp when they see the difference - they get this really ugly expression, how the hell did you manage that? E-mail me please Nicola@stevespiderweb.co.uk
In this case, Chris (T) reaaaaallllllllyyyy didn't want to give him that!.....
Exactly haha.
@@TheGlasgowGamer I can't believe that guy is still appealing his case after all this time!.......Give up and go home ffs!....
Focusing on the final question, she put her head in her hands not because he said he was playing, but because he dropped himself in it by stating he didn't know what a googol was, then changed his mind and played. Recently, they contested the courts decision. Another court case if they loose will cost them
£££ and no doubt bankrupt them.
So be it.👍
I didn't know Radio X was a real station... I thought that was GTA San Andreas only.
Chris Moyles hasn't let himself go
Quiz was good but I found the emphasis in court on the Defence Counsel input irritating and obviously done for ITV's core raison d'etre. It needed to be balanced by more Prosecuting Counsel input, especially rebuttal of the Defence Counsel's emotional crap. Blink, and you'd wonder if there'd been a Prosecuting Counsel.
Did he have to ‘cough’ up the winnings though?
The cheque was withheld. He never got his 'winnings'.
Brilliant comment
E to the Dawg😆👍🏽
I see what you did there....🤦🏾
What on earth is Chris Moyles writing down? Chris is talking to him and he’s jotting away like he’s at school!
Total muppet! While I would never condone deliberate fraudulent activity; if he’d stopped at £32,000 or even £64,000 and accepted that he might have got away with it. Greed was his downfall!
Oh please ITV have ruined people's lives to make money for decades. Who cares if someone tried to do it back to them? They probably made more money from the publicity than they would have lost if they let him run off with the money. It doesn't matter if the contestant wins or loses it's all about the ratings.
Imagine if the answer to the million pound question was Arsenal.
Arsenal wouldn’t be involved with that much money.
I think he is referring to an old Morcambe and Wise sketch.
Eric Morecambe would have given him the answer, 'harsnel!'
@@johnbull9195 Here is, at 2.50 or so, Ernie Wise coughing in an appreciated reference back to the sketch where Morecambe had coughed and said "Arsenal!" beneath the cough to signal that the club was indeed the right answer. - th-cam.com/video/81DRYmDhOAc/w-d-xo.html
At rehearsal on Nov 12th 1999, Tarrant told us all not to worry about early lifeline expenditure and cited an unsporty chap who, not long before, had asked the audience about, "Which of these soccer clubs did the double last season?"
He said, "The whole nation was screaming ´Arsenal´, but he asked the audience. And didn´t touch the lifelines again until about 64,000."
Fate there began the scooping up the key constituents of the Morecambe and Wise sketch in order they be cast out again with the trial of Charles Ingram.
Don´t you think!?
Tarrant is quite wrong to say that Ingram had been found guilty of a 30,000 Pounds insurance fraud before he played Millionaire?
He got the date of a previous burglary wrong by a few weeks when reporting a burglary at another address in August 2003. The discrepancy was noticed by a Private Investigator hired by Direct Line who visited Tarrant´s home to push letters drawing attention to the matter through his letterbox in the hours of darkness. Tarrant passed those on to the Police.
Even though, under normal circumstances the consequences would have proved hardly more serious than an invalidation of the claim or a slight increase in premium, the Police decided to prosecute.
Ingram was found guilty twenty-five months AFTER he won his money at Bournemouth court on two counts of deception and David Taylor of Wilts Constabulary specified to the media throng on the court steps afterwards "...that´s NOT Fraud".
All these facts and many more are set out here www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Show-Cough-Millionaire-Major-ebook/dp/B00SOVGFJ2
I believe his insurance fraud conviction happened after Millionaire and was down to a legitimate burglery that happened but they had put incorrect details when they took out the insurance and then the insurance was void when they tried to claim
That's not true! They had several ins companies and was fraudulently claiming from all of them. He was found guilty but, once again, got away with no jail time.
@@alegriabarofka7378 THAT´s not true,
The late Bob Woffinden and I wrote, Bad Show: The Quiz, The Cough, The Millionaire Major upon which James Graham based both his West End play QUIZ and subsequent TV series.
www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Show-Cough-Millionaire-Major-ebook/dp/B00SOVGFJ2
We go into some detail about what happened.
EGGLOVER2010 is quite correct.
What Tarrant tells Moyles re the 30K insurance scam is quite inaccurate.
I was also interviewed in mid-April 2020 on TalkRadio. (Sadly, this link may not be patent after May 13th 2020. ) bbwetransfer.com/downloads/e8eab0abed904df1ad4e68f17326f8dc20200506120034/8cf097fe3353593564a4ea47acdfa5bd20200506120051/5aeb3a?WT_email_tracking&fbclid=IwAR0XBGTHa3i6mcxMn7QenjxX73zwtthy71SkT4UmHK1j1QZcT6nT1w2MO0Q
@@alegriabarofka7378Also the fraud actually did happen before he went on Millionaire. It went to court after, but they were already turning into cheats.
That git the major has been so emboldened by this programme. How this git became a major is beyond me.
@Red Pilled Fox He's sunk to a new low- a mine shaft
Dom is still working with Moyles?
Who's that skinny guy? Looks a bit like Chris Moyles off the radio 😂
melvyns1975 as annoying as Moyles can be , kudos for keeping that weight off
"It's been 20 years half the people involved are probably dead" Hahaha lol people usually live a bit longer than that Chris
some die young lol
barristers and judges are often already old
You are right, the majority of people do live more than 20 years. However, when you consider that there were probably around 100 people or so in the audience and several crew members, the police, Crown Prosecution Service, Scotland Yard and the court staff who all investigated the case, all of whom were of various ages, from junior to senior, the chances are some of them are probably now deceased. But who knows?
@@lewiswise7808 Chris is a pr1ck he stitched up an innocent couple, ITV made millions per episode who cares of they cheated its only a game. Chris has a lot to answer for
I bought Bob Woffinden's book when it came out in 2015, it offers a competely persuasive argument for their innocence.
I'll inform the jury.
Should never of left radio 1 miss waking up years ago for school and banging abit of Chris moyles on
Dean Martin listen to radio x then? Miles better
In the drama, the defence was fantastic but despite all that, the cough (NO!) was the nail in the coffin.
This is it, you can play devil's advocate all you want up to about 250K, but after that the proceedings of the programme are almost completely indefensible on the part of the Ingrams and Whittock. Not to mention Larry Whitehurst spotting the coughs at that point and the Ingrams having a row in their dressing room rather than celebrating after they'd left the set.
Lost all interest in what they were talking about when I saw the sexy blonde lady sat opposite Chris moyles.
And she's actually engaged to Chris Tarrant's son
Guilty
After watching The Quiz, I went back and watched the original episode. I think he was a lot cleverer than was made out at the time. When he seems to get stuck on the Norman question at first glance he looks a bit thick. But he's absolutely right that the Normans were 'men of the north' originally from Scandanavia. I think he got most of the way there by himself. He said most of the correct answers before there was any chance of cough based feedback.
I don't think Diana Ingram helped him on the A1 question. I believe his story that he changed his mind based on audience reaction.
But he was undoubtedly helped on the last two questions. It's so obvious it's embarrassing.
This is why they've said in numerous documentaries that they wouldn't have had a case if he had stopped at £250,000....and it's true! Most of the evidence against him comes during the last two questions.
Did they not ask him what he thought of Michael Sheen's portrayal of him?
They asked him on Good Morning Britain
I mean how reliable is tecwen exactly? He won £1k himself and you're trying to make me believe Ingram would gamble 218k on a cough from a man he scarcely if at all knows? And then on Quiz tecwen asks the guy next to him for the £1m question. What if he didn't actually know? 468k on this guy sounds like he knows it. These are absurd amounts to be gambling on hoping somebody else knows the answer.
finael answer ? cough cough
No one would make a guess on the million pound question and risk losing over 400 grand . I watched it at the time and that was when I definitely knew he was cheating . Before that he kept reading every possible answer out loud , that's when my suspicions were raised but the final question where he changed his mind , as he had on previous questions , just confirmed he was at it .
Alot of Dramas based on real cases always go down the perperatrators are victims too route .He was a crook well all three of them were .i agree with Chris Tarrant
They cheated on a TV game show what's the big deal? Hardly a major crime is it?
Didn't even really cheat they just found a way to game the system. I say fair play to them.
Chris Moyles looks like he's done hard time.
Anyone who has watched the original prog, which is available on YT. AND, thinks that criminal gang are innocent. Makes me doubly grateful that we, still have no capital punishment. How the hell they were given such light sentences, was a crime in it's self, and proves how many idiots there are, 'practicing Law'.
Sat at home, I actually once knew the answer, to the million pound question. It was the other 14 questions in-be-tween, that screwed me. and that's as close as I will ever get to winning it.
Definetely guilty but the drama kinda made me sorry for the guy, seemed to be utterly controlled by that wife and her brother..
Agree. He seemed to be getting bullied by them both. Whether that was true I don't know.
I agree, don't think it applied that he was innocent, just easily manipulated. I feel sorry for their kids and the poor dog.
@@vintagesoup79 Same.
You feel sorry for a fictional character based on a real person
The insurance fraud was after Who wants to be a millionaire
No I think it was before but the trial cam after.
@@r4h4al He was NEVER found guilty of ANY Insurance Fraud. He WAS found guilty, 6 months AFTER the Millionaire? trial on 2 counts of "Obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception" which, as a spokesman for Wilys Constabulary said to the assembled media throng on te seps of Bournemouth Court was "NOT FRAUD".. That will be in the BBC archive for it was broadcast as a documentary in the series Real Story, presented by Fiona Bruce on Nov 24th 2003 on BBC1.
Safely at £500,000, and gambles dropping down to £32,000 if he didn't know the answer (which heckearly stated he didn't) THEN decides he knows the answer and plays. Blatant cheat. Typical of the british military to request him to resign his commission. All other ranks would of been court martialled. He leaves with an unblemished military record. 😡😡😡😡😡
Disgusting!
Of course he was guilty, jeez 🙄
He was innocent, people paid to say differently...
The cover up over all these years and all the staff involved would cost the same if not more as paying the guy the million to begin with.
You are a dickhead if you think that!
Furthermore, history clearly indicates there have been actual million pound winners in WWTBAM. What makes Charles Ingram different from, say, Judith Keppel or Pat Gibson?
I’ve got a strange feeling... they’re actually innocent.
They're not. Why would Chris Tarrant say they're guilty unless convinced they were?
Reborn Audio you’re an idiot then
@@r4h4al I think they're guilty too, but the fact that Chris Tarrant is convinced that they are doesn't make it a certainty.
@@ilikethisnamebetter It does.
@@r4h4al No, it doesn't. Do you think Chris Tarrant is omniscient?