Am a long time Zwift user and just got on Rouvy. Absolutely love the realism and the ability to explore real locations. Far more immersive than i could have hoped for as someone who just likes to go on rides to clear the mind.
I was training for my 70.3 IM performance in Mallorca this year and can say that the climbs I performed on Rouvy as prep were more or less the same pace I could then do there on the ground. So thumbs up for the accuracy.
I am using Rouvy for 3 years. For me, riding bike means exploring the world, so zwift is boring to me, Rouvy let you explore the world while on indoor trainer, it's just more interesting
I’ve been using ROUVY this year and love it. I’m not bothered about racing, so for me it is an immersive experience, riding great routes around the world and for structured training rides. I use a Kickr climb for added realism and it helps with comfort on longer rides as weight shifts on the saddle.
I love Rouvy for those winter days that taking it out is not possible. But it is very different to reality. Outside, a breeze can slow you down, a strong wind gust can bring you to a complete stop, the rough tarmac can make your butt feel sore, and much more. Rouvy however, can get you where you most likely will never be. Also, in real life being a lone rider, with Rouvy it is the only way for me to get social or sort of when cycling.
I have abandoned Zwift in favour of Rouvy earlier this year and I haven't looked back, I particularly love the paced ride option which enables me to mostly switch off and just keep turning the pedals until I've had enough, the graphics are mostly good enough although sometimes I've experienced a moment where my on screen rider disappears or rides off into the distance like the "camera" view can't keep up somehow. Weirdly I still get some anxiety when there's an oncoming car, and a car almost pulls out in front of you near the top of the Col d'Èze which seems to make the heart rate go up, so I guess it's a kind of testament to it's immersiveness.
Been using Rouvy for a few years. Nothing quite like riding the Stelvio on it. Have done a few times. Just beaut. Good training for when I can one day afford to do it IRL.
Rouvy's on screen graphics of tue full gradient profile as well as the profile of what's immediately ahead (within seconds) is waaaay better than Zwift
Rouvy is definitely my choice! I enjoy exploring places I'd love to ride but know I'll never have the chance to visit there or visit as long as I'd like. It doesn't need to be the famous ones, just local ones from my favorite areas are great too!
Using Rouvy for a year, far far better than Mickey Mouse land ( Zwift ), been over Col D´Aspin a couple of times and up on Mount Ventoux from Malaucerne, cycled two hours at descent from Bedoin and going up Mt Ventoux iRL next june. For better experience I use a Elite rizer with my smarttrainer, really a great feature. Worst about Rouvy is ghostriders, but those are easy to remove and change so you see it from "your own eyes" and not a stupid avatar.
Think about it. Indoor “hills” are just level 0% grade riding into a head wind using your level riding muscles. Try elevating your front wheel and you will feel the upper hammies work a bit harder and climbing muscles
I switched from rouvy to Fulgas just because it has more routes and I don’t need the weird AR stuff. Both are pretty accurate tbh. All you have to do is fiddle with your weight and aero settings in the apps to get your sim numbers to line up to similar flat and climbs speeds to outsmdoors
I’ve always wondered which would be quicker…my power always seems higher on flats on the turbo but higher outside on climbs…bizarre and not sure how to sort that!
I'm curious how realistic people find it for steeper climbs. I am looking at a trip in Switzerland. While I have a 4.5% 24km climb in my area, I don't have any that compare to the Swiss passes. Several are on Rouvy. Is it a fair assumption that if I can do it on Rouvy, I can do it in real life?
Having just made the switch from Zwift to Rouvy, I really do like the much more realistic experience. However, something that still troubles me is the climbing difficulty compared to real life. I've seen several people comment on the same thing but often it seems to be ignored. A 6% grade for example on Rouvy seems much tougher than the same thing in the real world. When I do get to something in double digits, I'm nearly having to stand on the pedals to keep them turning. Now, I'm just "Joe Average" on the bike so I would expect them to be difficult, but I can manage them in the real world. On Rouvy they're nearly impossible.
The difference between indoors and outdoors on the same route isn’t comparable at all and doesn’t need to be. You can’t do both at the same time and I’m not sure you will ever have to compete against a rider tackling the exact same route at exactly the same time with one of you virtual and the other in the actual space. If you are having fun, getting fit and doing what you love, just do it. I will always be quicker virtually as the equipment I can choose is way better than my actual bike! Fun video though 😊
I got the sl8 and find it very hard to paddle. Like having a 54 chainring. I also noticed that you are having difficulty attaining acceleration. Right?
Although you do not have any bots to ride with, Fulgaz has better visual imagery and realistic ride than Rouvy. I have a subscription to both including Zwift, because indoor cycling will get boring after a month.
Well that was..... the VS in thr title led me to believe the times and power etc on indoor and virtual would be shared at the end, but no, it was just a lame advertisement.
Yes and no. Possibly depending the trainer. For me, I'm way faster on flats on trainer, but uphill it's way beyond hard, compared to what I experience on pubic roads.
The graphics are in kind of uncanny valley, they might call it "realistic" or whatever, but it's actually weird. No matter the amount of advertising, Rouvy is never beating Zwift.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
Am a long time Zwift user and just got on Rouvy. Absolutely love the realism and the ability to explore real locations. Far more immersive than i could have hoped for as someone who just likes to go on rides to clear the mind.
I was training for my 70.3 IM performance in Mallorca this year and can say that the climbs I performed on Rouvy as prep were more or less the same pace I could then do there on the ground. So thumbs up for the accuracy.
I am using Rouvy for 3 years. For me, riding bike means exploring the world, so zwift is boring to me, Rouvy let you explore the world while on indoor trainer, it's just more interesting
Thanks, @stinkybeam. That's precisely what we aim to do: not make it boring and to add some value as travelling is. 💜
@@ROUVY❤ć
I've been in South Africa, Japan and US in one hour today 😀 it's just awesome
My times on ROUVY up climbs are pretty much identical to my times on the same times in reality. Very accurate. Zwift is very flattering.
I’ve been using ROUVY this year and love it. I’m not bothered about racing, so for me it is an immersive experience, riding great routes around the world and for structured training rides. I use a Kickr climb for added realism and it helps with comfort on longer rides as weight shifts on the saddle.
Hi @grahambowes756, we are very pleased to hear that! Love the combination of ROUVY and Kickr. 💜
I love Rouvy for those winter days that taking it out is not possible. But it is very different to reality. Outside, a breeze can slow you down, a strong wind gust can bring you to a complete stop, the rough tarmac can make your butt feel sore, and much more. Rouvy however, can get you where you most likely will never be. Also, in real life being a lone rider, with Rouvy it is the only way for me to get social or sort of when cycling.
Hi @couldron101, thank you for sharing that feedback. Appreciate it. 😋💜
I have abandoned Zwift in favour of Rouvy earlier this year and I haven't looked back, I particularly love the paced ride option which enables me to mostly switch off and just keep turning the pedals until I've had enough, the graphics are mostly good enough although sometimes I've experienced a moment where my on screen rider disappears or rides off into the distance like the "camera" view can't keep up somehow. Weirdly I still get some anxiety when there's an oncoming car, and a car almost pulls out in front of you near the top of the Col d'Èze which seems to make the heart rate go up, so I guess it's a kind of testament to it's immersiveness.
Its
Been using Rouvy for a few years.
Nothing quite like riding the Stelvio on it. Have done a few times. Just beaut. Good training for when I can one day afford to do it IRL.
Rouvy's on screen graphics of tue full gradient profile as well as the profile of what's immediately ahead (within seconds) is waaaay better than Zwift
Rouvy is definitely my choice! I enjoy exploring places I'd love to ride but know I'll never have the chance to visit there or visit as long as I'd like. It doesn't need to be the famous ones, just local ones from my favorite areas are great too!
Yes it is advertisement however the realism of Rouvy is outstanding.
Using Rouvy for a year, far far better than Mickey Mouse land ( Zwift ), been over Col D´Aspin a couple of times and up on Mount Ventoux from Malaucerne, cycled two hours at descent from Bedoin and going up Mt Ventoux iRL next june. For better experience I use a Elite rizer with my smarttrainer, really a great feature. Worst about Rouvy is ghostriders, but those are easy to remove and change so you see it from "your own eyes" and not a stupid avatar.
Think about it. Indoor “hills” are just level 0% grade riding into a head wind using your level riding muscles. Try elevating your front wheel and you will feel the upper hammies work a bit harder and climbing muscles
I switched from rouvy to Fulgas just because it has more routes and I don’t need the weird AR stuff. Both are pretty accurate tbh. All you have to do is fiddle with your weight and aero settings in the apps to get your sim numbers to line up to similar flat and climbs speeds to outsmdoors
I’ve always wondered which would be quicker…my power always seems higher on flats on the turbo but higher outside on climbs…bizarre and not sure how to sort that!
I'm curious how realistic people find it for steeper climbs. I am looking at a trip in Switzerland. While I have a 4.5% 24km climb in my area, I don't have any that compare to the Swiss passes. Several are on Rouvy. Is it a fair assumption that if I can do it on Rouvy, I can do it in real life?
oh yes. but it also will depend on circumstances, like weather, rain, wind, heat, traffoc, still i say if you can do it on rouvy, you can do it in rl.
Having just made the switch from Zwift to Rouvy, I really do like the much more realistic experience. However, something that still troubles me is the climbing difficulty compared to real life. I've seen several people comment on the same thing but often it seems to be ignored. A 6% grade for example on Rouvy seems much tougher than the same thing in the real world. When I do get to something in double digits, I'm nearly having to stand on the pedals to keep them turning. Now, I'm just "Joe Average" on the bike so I would expect them to be difficult, but I can manage them in the real world. On Rouvy they're nearly impossible.
The difference between indoors and outdoors on the same route isn’t comparable at all and doesn’t need to be. You can’t do both at the same time and I’m not sure you will ever have to compete against a rider tackling the exact same route at exactly the same time with one of you virtual and the other in the actual space. If you are having fun, getting fit and doing what you love, just do it. I will always be quicker virtually as the equipment I can choose is way better than my actual bike! Fun video though 😊
I got the sl8 and find it very hard to paddle. Like having a 54 chainring. I also noticed that you are having difficulty attaining acceleration. Right?
So who else is here following the Zwift price rise😂
I dont know, somehow the question whether you're faster indoors or outdoors was not answered... was it?
It was “by a few seconds”
@@roadcc thx!
Thanks for the infomercial
I use Rouvy as a proxy for virtual tourism of routes I'll likely never experience in real life.
This is just an advertisement.
You are right
I wonder if it was a paid for advertisement, didn't see any flag or notification.
@@jd0johnsoncheck the top left corner
Cry
and? you just sound pretty dumb
Wait a minute. Is that a SL7? I thought you had an Allez Sprint with that color 🤔
Although you do not have any bots to ride with, Fulgaz has better visual imagery and realistic ride than Rouvy. I have a subscription to both including Zwift, because indoor cycling will get boring after a month.
Well that was..... the VS in thr title led me to believe the times and power etc on indoor and virtual would be shared at the end, but no, it was just a lame advertisement.
Yes and no. Possibly depending the trainer. For me, I'm way faster on flats on trainer, but uphill it's way beyond hard, compared to what I experience on pubic roads.
Zwift, definitely faster. Mywhoosh seems more realistic. Never tried Rouvvy
Sooooo what is the verdict? No data?!?
Ai si ai siiiiiiiii
The graphics are in kind of uncanny valley, they might call it "realistic" or whatever, but it's actually weird. No matter the amount of advertising, Rouvy is never beating Zwift.
lol, why weird, its a vid of the actual route. zwift is disneyland stuff, no immersion at all.
Vids like this really need to be labeled: SPONSORED AD.
It has a paid promotion tag
Just sacked Zwift in favour for Rouvy, i will never go back to zwift.