I've been saying this a lot lately but the best way to incentivize going for wins rather than draws without increasing the amount of rounds it to decrease the amount of spots in top cut. Top 4 is the most obvious answer but you can also do something like top 10 with the top 2 being seeded automatically into finals and the remaining 8 players playing for the other 2 spots. This further incentivizes trying to win because getting a bye into finals is a huge deal.
This would definitely help with draws! The questions would just be to ask if it’s worth having fewer players feel good about how they played by limiting semifinalists. Due to the nature of 4-player, a top 16 cut is almost like a bandaid for scuffed losses tbh. I’d be very interested to see player feedback on a system like this.
29:39 I was really looking forward to the @ComedianMTG Review! After hearing it and the rest of the Marneus communities perspectives, I can say it's so dope to hear my interpretation on this commander was able to change up what people saw as "normal" for Marneus!! This was definitely one of my favorites to have brewed and performed with!! 💯
it is crazy to me that we all know that this guy is trying to make this his job. How we gonna watch his video over 1600 times thus far and only have 110 likes!?!? Support for this guy in the easiest form is to like and subscribe to his videos. He does a good enough job to at least get that from us! Keep up the good work man!
Greate video, appreciate the content! Love the Rivalry in Rakdos. Just one thing, I don't know whether this is because of your new desk setup (congrats on the standing desk), but there was some constant rumbling in the background at times, which is pretty loud and aggravating to me.
Love your new editing and production (plus all the content you do), but the outro music is *much* louder than the rest of the video. As for the the new standing desk, you had a bunch of bumping sounds, like your mic was bouncing around on something or something wobbling around on the desk.
Nice breakdown, it was super epic seeing both both Max and Max make top four for this. And congrats on your top 16! I say we spam release Google Docs and bash all players that draw into top 16 moving forward. That seems to be a solid solution for most problems within CDH thus far lmaooo. Seriously though, someone smart plz figure this out, k thanks! 😆
To stop draws you need to make ID worth 0 and the only way to get 1 point for a draw is if it actually goes to time. Offering draws over and over in game is bad sportsmanship imo.
ID was made because people used to think about their mulligans for 50 minutes if they wanted to draw (in "normal" formats). There is no rule that says you have to play in a timely manner if your opponent doesn't call a judge. So if you say that a draw is worth 1 only if it goes to time instead of ID I will propose thinking about mulligans for however long the round timer is.
you cant actually ever kill your own bowmaster token with bowmasters triggers because the damage and the adding a 1/1 happen as part of resolving the same trigger so state based effects arent checked until after its already got the new counter
Not how that works. The card says “Then amass orcs 1” so that part of the effect happens after the damage. Similar to how cards like living death can work. So you can kill your bowmasters only when it is a 1/1, otherwise it won’t work
@@anthonyi8484No, you can't. There's a quote that I like in situations like this: "Damage doesn't kill creatures, state-based-actions kill creatures." If you target your own 1/1 orc army token, what happens is that during the resolution of the effect: one damage is dealt to the army token, then you amass and place a second +1/+1 counter on it, then state-based actions check and see a 2/2 creature with 1 damage one it. This is similar-ish to what happens when you Bolt a 2/3 Tarmogoyf.
@@williamwright3715 you are right, I am wrong. I saw the same mistake in multiple videos so I thought it was something you could do. I have brought dishonor upon my family, I will end it all shortly
It's there but not terrible. I have a standing desk and I put weights or other fosget things under it so I don't get too bad about my figetyness when I teach.
Yeah not a big fan of the sportsmanship in general of the "colors are a crutch" duo. Obviously theres the draw controversy but just a bit demeaning of their opponents. Its why Ians tournament reports are so good, even if an opp makes a mistake or play you dont agree with, atleast you're respectful and move on.
I give my honest opinion on plays. When people make awesome plays I shout them out, when I disagree with plays I express that, when I make mistakes I bring them up. If you do not like our style that is 100% ok! - Wounded
@@ColorsAreACrutch I watched you and Max P do the tournament breakdown and you guys acknowledged the feel bads and understood why it kinda sucked which I appreciate. Another more important point I think is that it's not your responsibility to make a tournament fun(if you can cool). The point is to win and you guys made top 4. I thought it was pretty cool to see the 2 Max, 2 Rakdos top 4 personally.
As the person that got “screwed” that weekend… MaxP was very respectful and apologized to me. He’s a great dude from what I can tell and made a mistake. I watched the episode and I didn’t really have a problem with anything they were saying. But hey, we all got opinions, just like we all got butts 🤣
If the issue is an entire pod just deciding to draw instead of playing, that is a simple solution. Just make a rule to prevent it and make it count as a drop if they do it. If it is a time issue, you might have to extend the timer on rounds or make pods play until there is a winner. In CEDH it should not increase the timer that drastically.
In cEDH extending the timer until there is a winner, is very much a drastic problem. It would add hours to already grueling long days.We had that in the past, where even giving each player a single additional turn after time is reached could add a hour or more to a round.
@@mindfreak314 With the power level of cards these days, I cannot see how it adds hours to already long games. Most CEDH games I watch last at most like 15 to 20 minutes. However, I do not play in CEDH tournaments, so that opinion is skewed. Extending the timer was not an idea isolated to the idea of forcing the game to play on until there is a winner. It was just a solution to try and help the unintentional draws. Allowing entire pods to just choose not to play it out and agree to a draw is the only real problem I see here if that is indeed what is happening. Most games have rules prohibiting this exact thing because of what it does to competitive events.
@@scott898586 I play in tournaments and I'm also involved in organising them. I would love to let pods play it out, but that's not possible. Most games take way longer than 15-20 min. I don't know how you could possible get that impression. You can't prevent IDs, because if players want to ID, they will just pretend to play until time is reached. There are possible solutions that are currently explored, but it's a bit more complicated than "just don't allow it".
@@mindfreak314 What I am referring to is mostly just a pod or any players looking at each other and just agreeing to a draw and not playing at all. If players are going through a motion and you as a TO or even judge for the event see this behavior, you can call players into question as to why they intentionally did not play to win. It is usually pretty obvious assuming you could physically see what they have in hand, the board state, ect... The only way to de-incentivize intentional draws would be to punish them while finding a way to allow them space to play to win. Increasing rounds is the same as increasing the timer on rounds, but punishes the players doing well harder. Taking an additional rounds worth of time and dividing it among the rounds of the tournament may help a bit. However you will not stop IDs without some form of consequence.
Was going through the EDHTop16 of this tournament and noticed the absolute monstrosity in 35th place (2-3-0 record) of Ojer Kaslem mono green average nonland CMC of 4.04. Regarding the drawing thing I think splitting the top cut so some get a by in the knockout stage and some need to play an extra round could work, would need to play around with the numbers though. But it would encourage people to go for wins by giving a real incentive.
I have a question that perhaps someone could answer for me. I am new to cEDH and I see that a lot of the red decks have one "Rite of Flames" and I don't know the why that is in there? Is it just acting as an additional ( but worse) simian spirit guide or are there combos beyond just the acceleration of one mana. Love the content Ian and I now always looking forward to your videos.
30:40 You actually can't kill your army with bow masters. Damage doesn't kill creatures, they die to state based effects and the next time state based effects are checked the amass counter will have already been put on by the bow masters.
oh yeah people definitely hard cast it... It seems so weird but for some reason it works hahaha also yes Winny stuff coming soon including an article on Commanders Herald!
@@ComedIanMTG haha good to know! Also that’s great! Recently picked up your Kikki winota list about two months ago and have loved it but I’m ready to see how it can improve! Your slicer seems fun
Set a point minimum in order to be considered for top 16 that's higher than what two wins would award, and reduce draw values so they award no points. I'm sure that would incentivize people to play their pods. If a player can't even be considered for top 16 on two wins, and there's no benefit in a draw, they better go earn their spot. Otherwise, the next best solution would be to require all pods play until a winner is declared or time expires, which would void the possibility of a mutual draw.
Regarding the tournament cuts, I think it's really important to do multi-day tournaments. If it's a matter of TO time, I would not mind, tournaments being bi-monthly since more are popping up. Another benefit of this would be that players are less tired and likely to make mistake in late rounds and playoffs.
That’s why winnings and all that don’t necessarily mean much, because I hear all the stories from my friends who compete and most of these wins or people who do well, are only there because of draws. They need to fix this badly
RiledUpWhiteGuy and Malcom X have talked about simply randomized pod filling as opposed to by win%. And Hidden points bracket. This way all 5 rounds of swiss matter. People who win more that day are more likely to get top 16. I will say, 80min rounds with 0 mulligan time sucks. The play time ends up being ~65mins.
I've talked to a couple of TO's as well about ID and I'm sure its been hashed out before but my tired brain thinking on it again wonders if you can somehow make the last 2-3 rounds worth 6-7 points a win instead to incentivize play? I feel like you really want to incentivize getting 3 wins to get into the top 16 and going 2-0 at the start and then drawing the last 3 games isn't as automatic as it currently feels.
Did some napkin math, and came up with an idea for a top 40 cut that incentivizes top players playing it out 10 pods 1-4 seeds play in a separate pod. Winner gets a bye to the T4, losers get seeded into semifinal pods. 4-40 snake seeded into 9 pods. Winner moves on, losers are done. Winners of the 4-40 pods and the top pod losers get seeded into 3 semifinal pods. EDIT - the crux of my idea is that players need a meaningful incentive to want to get a higher seed. If the juice isn’t worth the squeeze, you’re not going to change their behavior.
How about just banning IDs? I know some will say “then the players can just force a draw in the game and not play to win” but if that’s the case, then do the players REALLY want the rule to change? I think certain players would secretly hate to see this changed because they benefit from it so heavily.
@@ComedIanMTG you have the voice and the audience to put the feelers out there and get feedback. It fixes 90% of the potential issues of OMW% squat spots and such and ensures play and could shake up the entire scene in a good way
@ComedIanMTG what would I have to do to swindle you into trying my list out in a tournament?? Lol I'm kinda joking. I want to take it into at least an online tournament myself but I'm a military service member and I have formations I have to be at on the weekends at 8am.
@@ComedIanMTG hahaha I don't expect anything but I shot you a message on discord. I love how the list plays but I'd be interested in seeing how it performs in better hands.
Maybe pairing the player with 2 wins with players with 1 win could remove the posibility of draw, and so on the rest of the tournament. The idea is that at least 2 or 3 players in the pod really needs the win to make it to the top16. Just thinking loud🤔
They really need to change the draw concept for these tournaments because someone that just has a great start should still have to put in effort in later rounds. Me personally I think if a person loses the game (Damage, Final Fortune, or Spite Pact), it should count as a loss not a draw even with no clear cut winner. The Damage one may cause some controversy though. Another round is probably the key factor though but makes tournaments such a grind, it's a dilemma for sure
More points for a natural draw. If you’re willing to sit through a 90 minute game of magic making no attempts to win that’s crazy. If you just make them play then won’t it solve the issue
Why the hell should we care about the top 16 if you get there by NOT playing magic. The solution? Make draws next to worthless. I would almost rather that if you go to time. A player is chosen at random and ONLY that player get points for the draw. But honestly if top 16 is filled with a bunch of draws, I would almost rather se decklists of interesting decks with just 1 win that are in or out of the top 16.
@@ComedIanMTG I suggest getting a workout band and tying it to the legs of your desk if you really like foot tapping. My buddies use stuff like that to bounce their feet without making noise.
Your mic setup needs to change -- there is a consistent noise throughout the video that sounds like you bumping the mic over and over. Might be you bouncing your leg or something, but it's very distracting.
I've been saying this a lot lately but the best way to incentivize going for wins rather than draws without increasing the amount of rounds it to decrease the amount of spots in top cut. Top 4 is the most obvious answer but you can also do something like top 10 with the top 2 being seeded automatically into finals and the remaining 8 players playing for the other 2 spots. This further incentivizes trying to win because getting a bye into finals is a huge deal.
Yeah the top 10 setup seems really cool
This would definitely help with draws! The questions would just be to ask if it’s worth having fewer players feel good about how they played by limiting semifinalists.
Due to the nature of 4-player, a top 16 cut is almost like a bandaid for scuffed losses tbh. I’d be very interested to see player feedback on a system like this.
29:39 I was really looking forward to the @ComedianMTG Review! After hearing it and the rest of the Marneus communities perspectives, I can say it's so dope to hear my interpretation on this commander was able to change up what people saw as "normal" for Marneus!! This was definitely one of my favorites to have brewed and performed with!! 💯
it is crazy to me that we all know that this guy is trying to make this his job. How we gonna watch his video over 1600 times thus far and only have 110 likes!?!?
Support for this guy in the easiest form is to like and subscribe to his videos. He does a good enough job to at least get that from us! Keep up the good work man!
Greate video, appreciate the content! Love the Rivalry in Rakdos.
Just one thing, I don't know whether this is because of your new desk setup (congrats on the standing desk), but there was some constant rumbling in the background at times, which is pretty loud and aggravating to me.
Love your new editing and production (plus all the content you do), but the outro music is *much* louder than the rest of the video. As for the the new standing desk, you had a bunch of bumping sounds, like your mic was bouncing around on something or something wobbling around on the desk.
The bumping was unlistenable for me, had to turn it off.
Healthy competition between homies is great.
Nice breakdown, it was super epic seeing both both Max and Max make top four for this. And congrats on your top 16!
I say we spam release Google Docs and bash all players that draw into top 16 moving forward. That seems to be a solid solution for most problems within CDH thus far lmaooo. Seriously though, someone smart plz figure this out, k thanks! 😆
To stop draws you need to make ID worth 0 and the only way to get 1 point for a draw is if it actually goes to time. Offering draws over and over in game is bad sportsmanship imo.
If a pod wants to draw, they will then just pretend to play until time is reached.
ID was made because people used to think about their mulligans for 50 minutes if they wanted to draw (in "normal" formats). There is no rule that says you have to play in a timely manner if your opponent doesn't call a judge. So if you say that a draw is worth 1 only if it goes to time instead of ID I will propose thinking about mulligans for however long the round timer is.
i think theres some tapping or something as a result of Ian moving around and the standing desk shaking slightly
The struggle with my name made me laugh 😂 have a good week mate!
you cant actually ever kill your own bowmaster token with bowmasters triggers because the damage and the adding a 1/1 happen as part of resolving the same trigger so state based effects arent checked until after its already got the new counter
Not how that works. The card says “Then amass orcs 1” so that part of the effect happens after the damage. Similar to how cards like living death can work. So you can kill your bowmasters only when it is a 1/1, otherwise it won’t work
@@anthonyi8484No, you can't. There's a quote that I like in situations like this: "Damage doesn't kill creatures, state-based-actions kill creatures." If you target your own 1/1 orc army token, what happens is that during the resolution of the effect: one damage is dealt to the army token, then you amass and place a second +1/+1 counter on it, then state-based actions check and see a 2/2 creature with 1 damage one it. This is similar-ish to what happens when you Bolt a 2/3 Tarmogoyf.
@@williamwright3715 you are right, I am wrong. I saw the same mistake in multiple videos so I thought it was something you could do. I have brought dishonor upon my family, I will end it all shortly
@@anthonyi8484 Sudoku is a very honorable game.
It's there but not terrible. I have a standing desk and I put weights or other fosget things under it so I don't get too bad about my figetyness when I teach.
Hey love playing with ya Ian it was a good tournament next time I knock ya from top 16 I'll tell ya how to say my name 😂
Aww dang 😅
Yeah not a big fan of the sportsmanship in general of the "colors are a crutch" duo. Obviously theres the draw controversy but just a bit demeaning of their opponents. Its why Ians tournament reports are so good, even if an opp makes a mistake or play you dont agree with, atleast you're respectful and move on.
I really appreciate you saying that about the reports! I try very hard to be a positive representative of the community :)
I give my honest opinion on plays. When people make awesome plays I shout them out, when I disagree with plays I express that, when I make mistakes I bring them up. If you do not like our style that is 100% ok! - Wounded
@@ColorsAreACrutch I watched you and Max P do the tournament breakdown and you guys acknowledged the feel bads and understood why it kinda sucked which I appreciate. Another more important point I think is that it's not your responsibility to make a tournament fun(if you can cool). The point is to win and you guys made top 4. I thought it was pretty cool to see the 2 Max, 2 Rakdos top 4 personally.
@@jd7391 Appreciate you 🙏
As the person that got “screwed” that weekend… MaxP was very respectful and apologized to me. He’s a great dude from what I can tell and made a mistake. I watched the episode and I didn’t really have a problem with anything they were saying. But hey, we all got opinions, just like we all got butts 🤣
If the issue is an entire pod just deciding to draw instead of playing, that is a simple solution. Just make a rule to prevent it and make it count as a drop if they do it. If it is a time issue, you might have to extend the timer on rounds or make pods play until there is a winner. In CEDH it should not increase the timer that drastically.
In cEDH extending the timer until there is a winner, is very much a drastic problem. It would add hours to already grueling long days.We had that in the past, where even giving each player a single additional turn after time is reached could add a hour or more to a round.
@@mindfreak314 With the power level of cards these days, I cannot see how it adds hours to already long games. Most CEDH games I watch last at most like 15 to 20 minutes. However, I do not play in CEDH tournaments, so that opinion is skewed. Extending the timer was not an idea isolated to the idea of forcing the game to play on until there is a winner. It was just a solution to try and help the unintentional draws. Allowing entire pods to just choose not to play it out and agree to a draw is the only real problem I see here if that is indeed what is happening. Most games have rules prohibiting this exact thing because of what it does to competitive events.
@@scott898586 I play in tournaments and I'm also involved in organising them. I would love to let pods play it out, but that's not possible. Most games take way longer than 15-20 min. I don't know how you could possible get that impression. You can't prevent IDs, because if players want to ID, they will just pretend to play until time is reached. There are possible solutions that are currently explored, but it's a bit more complicated than "just don't allow it".
@@mindfreak314 What I am referring to is mostly just a pod or any players looking at each other and just agreeing to a draw and not playing at all. If players are going through a motion and you as a TO or even judge for the event see this behavior, you can call players into question as to why they intentionally did not play to win. It is usually pretty obvious assuming you could physically see what they have in hand, the board state, ect... The only way to de-incentivize intentional draws would be to punish them while finding a way to allow them space to play to win. Increasing rounds is the same as increasing the timer on rounds, but punishes the players doing well harder. Taking an additional rounds worth of time and dividing it among the rounds of the tournament may help a bit. However you will not stop IDs without some form of consequence.
Man, I miss hall Breacher That was when Oprah's thief was at its Zenith.
Gotta love talk to text
Isnt wrong Oprah is a theif lol @TheZombieGrunt
Oprah's thief must be paid well
Love your content, what's the name of the song at the end it's a banger
Was going through the EDHTop16 of this tournament and noticed the absolute monstrosity in 35th place (2-3-0 record) of Ojer Kaslem mono green average nonland CMC of 4.04.
Regarding the drawing thing I think splitting the top cut so some get a by in the knockout stage and some need to play an extra round could work, would need to play around with the numbers though. But it would encourage people to go for wins by giving a real incentive.
I have a question that perhaps someone could answer for me. I am new to cEDH and I see that a lot of the red decks have one "Rite of Flames" and I don't know the why that is in there? Is it just acting as an additional ( but worse) simian spirit guide or are there combos beyond just the acceleration of one mana. Love the content Ian and I now always looking forward to your videos.
Worse simian is a great way to describe it 😅
30:40 You actually can't kill your army with bow masters. Damage doesn't kill creatures, they die to state based effects and the next time state based effects are checked the amass counter will have already been put on by the bow masters.
So at the end of the day, all I know is Ob finished in 3rd and Florian finished in 4th 😂 - WoundedSatellite
Pffft -Max P
👀👀👀
Let’s call it a tie 🤣
@nick I see what you did there 🤣 -Max P
Are people hard casting hullbreaker? Also is there going to be an update on the winota deck and its changes? Excited!
oh yeah people definitely hard cast it... It seems so weird but for some reason it works hahaha
also yes Winny stuff coming soon including an article on Commanders Herald!
@@ComedIanMTG haha good to know! Also that’s great! Recently picked up your Kikki winota list about two months ago and have loved it but I’m ready to see how it can improve! Your slicer seems fun
Random thought: what if you could only get 2 points by drawing max? At least in these 5 round tournaments it could force more games to be played
Set a point minimum in order to be considered for top 16 that's higher than what two wins would award, and reduce draw values so they award no points. I'm sure that would incentivize people to play their pods. If a player can't even be considered for top 16 on two wins, and there's no benefit in a draw, they better go earn their spot. Otherwise, the next best solution would be to require all pods play until a winner is declared or time expires, which would void the possibility of a mutual draw.
Regarding the tournament cuts, I think it's really important to do multi-day tournaments. If it's a matter of TO time, I would not mind, tournaments being bi-monthly since more are popping up. Another benefit of this would be that players are less tired and likely to make mistake in late rounds and playoffs.
Hey Ian, currently testing Acquire to steal One rings. Too cute? I like it tho! Lol😂
Whats your outro song?
That’s why winnings and all that don’t necessarily mean much, because I hear all the stories from my friends who compete and most of these wins or people who do well, are only there because of draws. They need to fix this badly
RiledUpWhiteGuy and Malcom X have talked about simply randomized pod filling as opposed to by win%. And Hidden points bracket.
This way all 5 rounds of swiss matter. People who win more that day are more likely to get top 16.
I will say, 80min rounds with 0 mulligan time sucks. The play time ends up being ~65mins.
*Kid
I've talked to a couple of TO's as well about ID and I'm sure its been hashed out before but my tired brain thinking on it again wonders if you can somehow make the last 2-3 rounds worth 6-7 points a win instead to incentivize play? I feel like you really want to incentivize getting 3 wins to get into the top 16 and going 2-0 at the start and then drawing the last 3 games isn't as automatic as it currently feels.
Did some napkin math, and came up with an idea for a top 40 cut that incentivizes top players playing it out
10 pods
1-4 seeds play in a separate pod. Winner gets a bye to the T4, losers get seeded into semifinal pods.
4-40 snake seeded into 9 pods. Winner moves on, losers are done.
Winners of the 4-40 pods and the top pod losers get seeded into 3 semifinal pods.
EDIT - the crux of my idea is that players need a meaningful incentive to want to get a higher seed. If the juice isn’t worth the squeeze, you’re not going to change their behavior.
Love the rev on dawnwaker!!
How about just banning IDs? I know some will say “then the players can just force a draw in the game and not play to win” but if that’s the case, then do the players REALLY want the rule to change? I think certain players would secretly hate to see this changed because they benefit from it so heavily.
Solution, you can only ID the last round of swiss. That would mean a lot more records have been locked in or out.
I'd love that tbh
@@ComedIanMTG you have the voice and the audience to put the feelers out there and get feedback.
It fixes 90% of the potential issues of OMW% squat spots and such and ensures play and could shake up the entire scene in a good way
Marneus is cool to see! One of the more fun Esper commanders.
Shows the issues of gatekeeping on the database
What if you just changed the number of points for a win to a lower number? Or is there a reason it has to be 5 points for a win?
@ComedIanMTG what would I have to do to swindle you into trying my list out in a tournament?? Lol I'm kinda joking. I want to take it into at least an online tournament myself but I'm a military service member and I have formations I have to be at on the weekends at 8am.
Shoot me a dm and I can at least take a peak 🤷
@@ComedIanMTG hahaha I don't expect anything but I shot you a message on discord. I love how the list plays but I'd be interested in seeing how it performs in better hands.
There is a mic shake knocking noise.
Good Game well Played glad Izzet took it down
Maybe pairing the player with 2 wins with players with 1 win could remove the posibility of draw, and so on the rest of the tournament. The idea is that at least 2 or 3 players in the pod really needs the win to make it to the top16. Just thinking loud🤔
L i k e and s u b so Ian can be a L a d and do more c o n t e n t y thingers
Thats why making top 16 doesnt really matter . The top table final 4 seems more like a top 8 in single player to me
They really need to change the draw concept for these tournaments because someone that just has a great start should still have to put in effort in later rounds. Me personally I think if a person loses the game (Damage, Final Fortune, or Spite Pact), it should count as a loss not a draw even with no clear cut winner. The Damage one may cause some controversy though. Another round is probably the key factor though but makes tournaments such a grind, it's a dilemma for sure
interesting thought!
Tidebinder is clutch..... I just started running her
I’m going to start playing blue farm just so I can make angels grace my baby.
More points for a natural draw. If you’re willing to sit through a 90 minute game of magic making no attempts to win that’s crazy. If you just make them play then won’t it solve the issue
Make draws 0 points.
feels bad but it takes care of few problems we are seeing in the format currently.
Nifty
Controversy aside that's a sweet Top 4
Make wins worth more...?
Why the hell should we care about the top 16 if you get there by NOT playing magic.
The solution? Make draws next to worthless. I would almost rather that if you go to time. A player is chosen at random and ONLY that player get points for the draw.
But honestly if top 16 is filled with a bunch of draws, I would almost rather se decklists of interesting decks with just 1 win that are in or out of the top 16.
A draw should be zero points
Damn Krark - Eww 😅😅😅
easy don't let people draw.
Make draws worth 0 points.
Your adhd foot tapping is audible in this video.
oops lol I'll watch that in the future!
@@ComedIanMTG I suggest getting a workout band and tying it to the legs of your desk if you really like foot tapping. My buddies use stuff like that to bounce their feet without making noise.
Your mic setup needs to change -- there is a consistent noise throughout the video that sounds like you bumping the mic over and over. Might be you bouncing your leg or something, but it's very distracting.
Please stop bangin/tapping the table while recording?