ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Christopher Reeves is the BEST SUPERMAN. Change My Mind. (first time watching part 1)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2023
- Patreon: / shreenation
Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoff...
Become A Channel Member: / @shreenation
Visit shreenation.com for Video Creation Tips!
Second Channel: / @shreenation2
Thank you @internetphilosopher01 for helping me edit this video :)
Podcast:
open.spotify.c...
Movie Reviews:
/ @shreenation2
✨My Socials!✨
Instagram: / shreenation
Facebook: / theshreenation
Reddit: / shreenation
Binge my stuff:
Lessons in Stories: • Reviews - Shree Nation
Personal Stories: • StoryTime - Shree Nation
Reacting to Stories: • Movie Reactions - Shre...
Original movie: Superman (1978)
This video is for commentary and criticism only and is not a replacement for watching Superman (1978)
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT INTENDED. All rights belong to their respective owners.
#ShreeNation #FirstTimeWatching #MovieReaction
Watch Part 2: th-cam.com/video/4r_DKgIsBK0/w-d-xo.html
You said you watched another Christopher Reeves movie. And I think you said it had Michael Caine. Was It "Deathtrap"?
I love that movie.
Yes it was :)
I'm mesmerised by this woman in every way..beautiful ❤
According to Sir Roger Moore's autobiography, he witnessed Christopher Reeve walking through the canteen at Pinewood Studios in full Superman costume, oblivious to the swooning female admirers he left in his wake. When he did the same thing dressed as Clark Kent, no one paid any attention.
I agree Christopher Reeve is the best Superman and Clark Kent.
He was born to play this role 👏👏
thats a nice snippet from R Moore, IS his bio and life story worth the REad? I know he did that early series - the Saint on TV and that BRIT short lived series with Tony Curtis also
ONLY!
"James Bond and Superman walk into a bar..."
@@chrisleebowers James Bond says "Oww!"
This film really is still often cited as the gold standard for superhero movies. The screenwriter Mario Puzo also wrote The Godfather. Christopher Reeve was a perfect casting and balanced Clark and Kal-El identities with grace and respect to the source material.
Mario Puzo had only written the adaptation to his own "Godfather" novels at that point and bought a screenwriting book to help him write Superman. On the first page, it said, ‘The best screenplay ever written was The Godfather‘. He threw the book away.
His first draft of Superman was well over 200 pages long, making it a three hour plus epic, like his Godfather script. A lot of it became Superman 2.
The actual shooting script, at least for the first film, directed by Donner, was almost completely written by "Creative Consultant" Tom Mankiewicz. @@chrisleebowers
Richard Donner directed this epic movie which it is considered the beginning of the superhero genre movies
RIP, Christopher Reeve. He made us believe a man can fly.
RIP, Richard Donner, director.
RIP Margot Kidder, Lois Lane.
RIP, Ned Beatty, Otis.
RIP, Marlon Brando, Jor-El.
RIP, Tom Mankiewicz, screenwriter.
RIP, Geoffrey Unsworth, Cinematographer.
And the Great Gene Hackman as Lex Luthor.
@@matthewdunham1689 actually he's still alive
Damn, this made me sad :( Rest in peace to all these talented people 🙏
Rip John Barry the Production designer
what about Jackie Cooper (Perry White)?
The film was a box office and critical success, making $300 million dollars ($1.1 billion dollars today) against a $50 million dollar budget.
It won the Oscar for Best Visual Effects.
Wow!
Thank you.
The movie "Superman Returns" (2006) was made as a soft reboot of the Christopher Reeve movies taking "Superman" (1978), and to a lesser extent "Superman II" (1980), as cannon backstory for the movie. Brandon Routh was cast as Superman because of his resemblance Christopher Reeve, and supposedly studied Mr. Reeves portrayal so his own would be as close as possible to it.
The plot and story of "Man of Steel" (2013) takes elements from both Superman and Superman II, excises Lex Luthor and his plot line, and squishes what is left into one movie.
Christopher Reeve appeared in one movie prior to Superman, sixteen theatrical movies after Superman and before his accident. Mr. Reeve also appeared in sixteen made for T.V. movies, four of which were made after his accident. Prior to his accident Mr. Reeve appeared in eleven T.V. series, usually in only one episode as a guest star, and four more after his accident. Christopher Reeve made cameo appearances in two episodes of the "Smallville" T.V. series. If you wish to see more of him I would recommend "Somewhere in Time" (1980).
From all accounts Christopher Reeve was an admirable man, as decent as his most famous dual role as Clark Kent and Superman. It seems unlikely that anyone could have been better cast.
Thanks for letting me know!
Fun fact: Even though Christopher Reeve was tall enough for the role of Superman, he was very skinny. The director and producers wanted to put him in a bulky suit so he'd look more muscular. But Reeve insisted on actually looking like Superman. So he trained a lot in the gym by lifting weights and adding protein to his diet. He put on just enough muscle to actually fit into the Superman costume.
Another fun fact: Since you're watching the 3 hour special edition, in the train scene with little Lois Lane, her parents are played by Kirk Alyn and Noel Neill, who both played the first live action Superman and Lois Lane in the 15 part black and white serial in 1948.
Nice, thank you for the info ❤
Another fun fact: It was actually David Prowse, who trained Chris. He was the one who played Darth Vader (except for the voice, of course).
My favorite part of this movie comes right after Superman first rescues Lois and the TV newswoman on the ground cries, "I, I cannot believe it, he--he CAUGHT her!" It chokes me up every time, and for me, everything after that seems anticlimactic in comparison.
A lot of people forget that Christopher Reeve was a classically trained actor.
Christopher Reeve didn't portray Superman. He embodied him. Everything that defines who Superman is, what he stands for. As you pointed out He saved the president and Air force one , right after he got a cat out of a tree. Nothing, no matter hiw small or corny was below him. Thats great writing, direction, and above all convincing the audience its real. This movie is great all around. Fantastic writing, directing and great, iconic acting from all involved. Nothing against all other Superman actors, and some people will love George Reeves more, or Cavil, Welling, Chris Reeve just WAS Superman. The way he walked, talked, flew. The way he didn't have to pose or act differently. He embodied the strength, power, but also the kindness and compassion. That alone makes his portrayal the best. But when you throw in his incredible role as Clark Kent it blows your mind. He actually was TWO DIFFERENT people. No one laughed at the whole
" glasses only" disguise. It felt like two different people. When you get to part two you will see a scene where Superman is interviewed by Lois. They fly around the city in a very innuendo like way. Pay close attention to after Superman leaves and Clark shows up. There is a scene there where you will understand what seperates Reeve from everyone else.
Well said 👏
The couple with the little girl on the train are played by Kirk Alyn and Noel Neil... the original Superman and Lois Lane from the 1940s serials... Neil actually went on to play Lois in the 1950s T.V. series as well as playing the elderly woman that Lex Luthor cons in Superman returns.
Don't know if it was mentioned but the "Lois" on the train was Noel Neill. Lois Lane on the 50's TV show "Superman"
Leave it to Beaver's dad, Hugh Beaumont, played an ex convict that was trying to get his life together but no one would let him but Clark. Episode "The Big Squeenze" Sept. 25 1953.
Another one involving a sort of racism is about some creatures living underground that are being attacked because of how they looked. "Superman and the Mole Men"
Heady stuff for a child.
@@TommyBBQBessinger Not positive but it could be the extended cut.
He's easily the best. Christopher Reeve was great here, but also the filmmakers captured the character perfectly. The more recent attempts to make him more brooding and dark miss the point...his weakness isn't kryptonite, it's his ethics. He always does the right thing.
Years ago I did some work for his charity, but unfortunately never had the opportunity to meet him.
He's not dark and brooding, he's the big blue boy scout!
@@ajivins1 Agreed...and in this film they showed that it can be a weakness. He promised to help Ms. Teschmacher's Mom, and that's exactly what he did.
I feel like the newer iterations think Superman is boring because of his powers, and want to make him dark, cynical, and brooding to give him some depth. I really do think this is the wrong way to write that character.
@@Ocrilat Bruce Wayne's the damaged one. Superman has those powers but also the power to inspire good in others.
@@ajivins1 I'd even say Bruce Wayne isn't exactly broken...again, that's the modern take on it. I feel like the original Batman also had a code and ethics. He certainly didn't torture the criminals he caught, commit murder, etc. (like in the modern movies)...he delivered them to justice too.
The best super hero movie ever. It is the embodiment of what intelligent writing, acting, and directing can do. Plus a John Williams musical score that is one of his best. I await your review with joyful anticipation as you always seem to bring out insights in movies that I didn’t see before because of the nostalgic cloud that surrounds my memories. Namaste 🙏.
Thank you so much, it means a lot ❤🙏 See you soon!
@@ShreeNation verisimilitude, that's what Richard Donner went for when making this movie, he wasn't concerned with comic book lore to the point of being anally retentive, he understood the basics of Superman and made sure that the audience would feel that the hero on the screen looked real and well realized even though to many at the time he was a work of fiction, especially when comic books at the time weren't the high art of today but pulp fiction.
Agreed. Superman the Movie is still my favorite. And I also think Superman Returns is very underrated.
@@trhansen3244 Superman Returns was trying to be the sequel to Donner's version and it's own thing at the same time and failed, not spectacularly but failed, so in essence failed miserably, got to give the movie one major credit and that's Brandon Routh.
@@thegladve I disagree. I think it was a very good movie. Man of Steel? Now that was a failure in every way. Except Faora.
The definitive Superman on the silver screen.
The movie is of its time (the 70's) and you do feel it, which do make him a bit dated, but Christopher Reeves perfectly plays both sides (Clark and Superman) to perfection.
As Clark he is lovable and bumbling but without feeling ridiculous, and as Superman he is a whole other person that exudes strength, authority and yet benevolence and concern.
It's incredible how a pair of glasses and strong acting skills make a difference.
To my humble opinion, he is the only movie Superman who is so convincing as both characters.
For everyone who was born in the 70's and beyond, when hearing the fantastic John William score, only one Superman comes to mind (and ever will)... it's Christopher Reeves.
Couldn't agree more. Clark and Superman are so different that it's crazy to see one actor pull it off with just good acting and body language.❤
The glasses are actually legit, not just a punchline for people to make endless jokes. As an alien, Supes's eyes are a really vibrant shade of blue, so much so that it doesn't occur in humans. The glasses dim his eyes enough to make them look like human's. So that's why no one see through it, cause you'd remember those alien eyes.
@@CalciumChief
True, but i'm talking about the performance, a guy with a glasses is not really a disguise, you'd recognise anyone you know well with glasses or without.
But the movie makes it believable because Reeves really takes a whole new persona when he takes them off. He straighten up, change his voice, change his persona.
That's why he's truly unrecognisable as Clark Kent.
REEVE! It's amazing how so many people proclaim him the DEFINITIVE Superman, and he IS; but don't have the respect to know how to SPELL HIS NAME.
@radicalreactions1633 the actor who played the role in the 1950s TV show was George Reeves, so people often conflated the two names. Also, hearing someone say, "Christopher Reeve's performance was so good", it's easy to hear it wrong.
Christopher Reeves was Superman. There is no doubt about it. He was a true to life hero who will never be forgotten. He was a great actor with a heart of gold. There will never be another one quite like him. A heart of gold 💛
REEVE, no S.
Agreed!
I see this over and over again. One mistake the director made was to make the knowledge crystal green. Everybody thinks it's kryptonite, but it isn't; it's just green. But your thought is not unwarranted; it made sense because kryptonits IS green. The director maybe should've just made it glow a bright white, or something to distinguish it from the other glass crystals in Kal's transport ship shown at the beginning of the movie.
Yes, I gotta find that version. I did some research and found there were some versions that came out after the theatrical version which included scenes not in the theatrical version. I'm as in the dark as you are, so I gotta look into that!@@TommyBBQBessinger
Can't change your mind because you're 100% right..... Christopher Reeve was indeed the best Superman. Looking forward to this as ever 👍😉x
🥰🥰 See you soon!
All good points about Christopher Reeve's look as Superman. I read the comics as a kid, and I can't believe how much Reeve looked exactly like the Superman in the comics. Also, he did work out to be more muscular than when he was doing soaps. But he has a nice look, not jacked so much as really nice in terms of build. Finally, I thought he was crazy handsome. Oh yes, and he did do the Clark Kent miem very well. People sometimes complain that Lois couldn't recognize Clark as Superman, but he was slumped over, talked with this nerdy voice, and his overall demeanor was very different from Superman. So you made all good points!
Thank you 😇
Love this reaction video, and it’s the extended television released version to boot! Saw this back in 1978 then in 82 when it came to TV. 😀
Thanks for watching ❤
The reason this works so well is because it's a pure comic book. It's Superman, pure and simple.
I mean that's superman alright: pure and simple.
That's the whole point of him. Making him broody and such is more realistic... And defeats the point entirely.
Christopher Reeve is My One and only Superman. I never needed another since I saw this the night of it’s release when I was 9. Yes he was just a Great looking guy without even trying . Loved this reaction so much. Please hurry with the second half . Can’t wait🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠
Thank you, part 2 premiering in 2 hours!
Perhaps, you were thinking of George Reeves who played Superman in the 50s TV show. Noel Neill who played Lois in the Reeves TV show and the film serials with Kirk Alyn is the woman reading on the train Clark runs past. The man with her is Kirk Alyn who was the first live action Superman.
So great seeing someone react to this extended version of the film! This is the version I great up with when I recorded it off TV as a kid. They put in all the deletedmp scenes to pad out the run time so it would last 4 hours (with commercials) and they could divide it up and show it over two nights.
The theatrical version always feels like there's too much missing (like they cut out the part where you found out the little girl on the train was Lois Lane) because I knew this version first.
Best Regards!
Thank you, so glad you enjoyed ❤
One quirk of fate is that the Superman of the 1950s TV series Adventures of Superman was named George Reeves, this time with the "s." George was terrific in the role too and was severely typecast because of it. George's Lois Lane, Noel Neill, has a cameo in Superman the Motion Picture as I'm sure someone has already mentioned.
Christopher Reeve's performance as Clark Kent/Superman is undoubtedly great. Christopher Reeve immediately engrained himself into the public conscience, and is still to this day the definitive take on the character.
"You *laminated* them!"
Best ever description of this version of The Phantom Zone
I saw one video describe it as "trapping them in an 80s rock album cover"
My chief memory - as a 6 year old - was of my older brother (he was 17) being utterly glued to the screen! And an intermission following Supes flying towards the camera in the fortress of solitude. What's worse than this old man recollection is seeing the poster for this film in the lobby of our local cinema... directly after seeing Star Wars....
17:15 The little girl on the train is Lois Lane. Her parents are played by Noel Neill and Kirk Alyn, who played Lois and Clark in the 1948 Superman movie serial. And she repeated the role of Lois in the 1950s TV show.
27:53 Time doesn’t move differently on Krypton. During baby Kal-El’s flight to Earth his pod was moving near the speed of light.
Because of this time slowed to maybe 3-5 years for him inside the pod. But to the outside universe thousands of years would have passed.
This concept is known as time dilation and actually can be measured with two identical atomic clocks. Leave one on Earth and put the other on a satellite in space orbiting at thousands of MPH. After a year if you check the time on both, the one from the satellite will be several fractions of a second behind the one on Earth.
A couple of comments here. First, I love when Jonathan tells Clark, "You are here for a reason"...one of the best lines in the early part of the film. Gets me every time. Another thing is based on what Stan Lee once said. He said, "A lot of superheroes in their origins. Death had something to do with it." and it's true when you take a good hard look at some of the biggest characters in the comic book world. Batman, Spiderman, Superman, etc. There seems to be an on going pattern of loss so that the character's destiny can develop.
Also, I'm glad a couple of guys cleared up the notion about the crystal being kryptonite in the comments.
My impression is that Zod was originally a Cold War era character based on Stalin, except with no hair and no mustache. After this movie came out, as it so often happens, this bearded look became the iconic depiction of Zod. In his backstory, Zod tried to take over Krypton using a robot army (with all the robots looking like him), and once foiled, he was sentenced to the Phantom Zone. After that, Krypton is destroyed. Superman becomes aware of this and releases Zod from the Phantom Zone when his sentence is completed, but Zod hasn't reformed at all, and as a Kryptonian villain he was a match for Superman.
Thank you for the info 🙏
@@ShreeNation BTW, I should mention that I don't watch your channel anymore since you disclosed your awful position on global climate change. I can't support that.
The head of the council played Captain Bligh and Brando played Fletcher Christiab in Mutiny on the bounty. Brando asked for the actor to have the part.
The green crystal in-question is called (in Superman lore) a Sun Crystal. Now these data crystals have had other names throughout the years, but they're essentially designed as onboard computers and storage devices for Kryptonians. It's been years since I read the script for this film but I'm fairly sure they still call it a Sun Crystal. In this film, Clark throws the Sun Crystal and it uses the surrounding rocks and ice to create the Fortress of Solitude in the same style as Kryptonian architecture, hinting that the buildings there are grown, something Superman Returns messed with in it's story. As to how it does the things it does in this film, you can probably chalk that up to Mario Puzo since he wrote the original script.
edit: I had the blessing of meeting Christopher Reeve in 1999 during a stop of his Q&A tour and he truly was Superman. I cherish that memory and the fleeting moments I had to say hello to him before I moved on to let the next person greet him. I honestly miss him in a really personal way and I truly hope the next Superman embodies the spirit like Reeve.
Wow, that's incredible that you got to meet him! And thanks for explaining what the sun crystals are 🙏
I saw this movie the first time it was out back in the seventies and I was a little girl I thought he was so handsome and I've heard that he was a nice person and pretty nice to his fans and it's really sad what happened to him. Rest in peace Christopher Reeves
Love it! I know it's hard to tell what's going on with General Zod's sentencing. They weren't really made flat. Kryptonian criminals are sentenced and transported into another dimension called the Phantom Zone where they lead a lonely existence as immaterial phantoms. On the plus side, they don't age there. That square that flew at them was a portal to the Phantom Zone.
That green crystal wasn't Kryptonite. I don't know why they chose to make it green, because that makes everyone think it is. But Kryptonite was created when the planet exploded (radiation released in the explosion changed the rocky debris of the planet into Kryptonite). Since the crystal was shielded in Kal-El's rocket, it wasn't exposed to the radiation that changed the rest of the planet.
Lois Lane's parents on the train are part of Superman history; the woman was Noelle Neill, who played Lois on the Superman TV series in the 50s as well as a couple of movie serials and her father was Kirk Alyn, who played Superman in those same serials. George Reeves, who played Superman against Noelle in the TV series, committed suicide long before this movie was filmed. There's actually a good movie about the mystery of his death (some think it wasn't suicide).
Thank you for the info 🙏
Superman the Movie added a few things to the comic book mythology. The crystal from Krypton was not kryptonite. It was a crystal seed that grew a structure that is the Fortress of Solitude. Crystals do actually grow and Clark's crystal speeded up the process a few million times.
Thanks, good to know!
@@ShreeNation - choosing green for Clark's crystal? No mystery there! A very stupid choice. Literally any other color would have been appropriate. A great movie with incomprehensible choices, like Clark reversing the planets spin instead of just implying that he goes back in time. I hear the producers, father and son, were a nightmare to work with.
Fun Facts:
Jack O'Halloran who played "Non"
in Richard Donner's *"SUPERMAN"*
& *"SUPERMAN II"* (before Donner
was replaced by Richard Lester)
had previously played "Joe Perko"
in Paramount's 1976 remake of *"KING KONG".*
Susannah York who played "Lara
Lor-Van" later starred in the 1984
TV adaptation of Charles Dickens' *"A Christmas Carol"* which also had Titanic actors George C. Scott & Roger Rees (1996) and David Warner (1979 & 1997), as well as Michael Gough from the *"BATMAN"* tetralogy in 1989-1997.
Speaking of Titanic, "The 2nd Krypton Elder" was played by Harry Andrews who was "Captain E.J. Smith" in *"S.O.S. TITANIC"* (1979).
17:52 the man and the woman with Lois Lane on the train are a previous Superman and Lois Lane. Clark going up the road after beating the train at the crossing is a man on a motorcycle hauling a sheet of plywood to kick up dust.
Wow thanks for letting me know ❤
Kudos to you for watching the three hour cut! This cut was not approved by director Richard Donner and aired on broadcast TV! It took ABC two Weekend nights to fully air this cut because of commercials and the like. Can’t wait for part 2!
Thank you so much, glad you enjoyed 😇 🙏
It's so funny that when this movie was made, the conversation with his long dead father in which he could ask questions and get precise answers in real time seemed so far fetched. Now a few decades later we know exactly how to do this (Chat GPT). Just prop up a visual image that resembles the father, add a chat bot, and give it access to all the relevant information .
Soon we'll have dead relatives giving us answers like a Black Mirror episode 💀
The very superhero movie that *"made me believe a man can fly",* thanks to the brilliant director of Richard Donner. And the theme song by John Williams is unmatched 😎
In a superhero-saturated film industry, it's difficult to imagine a time when it just didn't exist on the big screen. The character - even across the pond in the UK - was as familiar as Santa Claus. As one commentator put it, it was (in American terms) the equivalent of making 'Coca-Cola: The Movie' and I still think the fact it was made in the 1970s is what gave it unexpected depth. Spielberg, no less, hassled the producers to be allowed to direct this movie. He could not have made a better job. And the reason is probably explained by Richard Donner's buzzword on this picture: 'verisimilitude'. It must seem 'real'....
Even as far away as the UK the split between Clark Kent (who I was as nerd, even in childhood) and Superman (who we all wanted to be) was kind of encouraging. And perhaps that is part of the message of the film. You could be something.
Superman is very personal to me. I was about six when I would see this and its sequel on the weekly television movie night. They had those back then - e.g. the NBC Monday Night Movie.
Kal-El’s sincerity, combined with extraordinary abilities, portrayed one of my earliest images of what a decent person is.
I’d later learn that the comic books originally attributed his powers, and those of the Kryptonians, to having developed their mental and physical bodies through nature.
As a Jew, I felt wonderful learning that two Jewish teenagers came up with Superman. The backstory matches the Moses story in the pentateuch. Moses’ sister puts him into a craft as a baby. This was to escape the death of their people. He is found by a motherly member of an alien culture and brought up as a member of this culture. He’s then between two cultures. Also, the meeting with his father in the white Fortress of Solitude reminds me of the burning bush and Moses communing with YHVH.
I’d like to read into this that Kal-El’s inherent intelligence and strength come from through, despite being an alien, to help people. He embodies what we can be capable of if we put effort into it.
I don’t think he is pretending to be a nerd. I think he feels awkward around people in a culture that doesn’t appreciate genuine-ness. He doesn’t see a need to use his strength to bully others, etc. I think this is why Lois doesn’t pay attention to him. This is why he acts the way he does.
It's a great film all around. I love Superman:The movie! Top notch acting and directing. A great script by Puzo, beautiful cinematography, and an iconic score by John Williams. It well deserves all the praise it gets.
Great reaction. Just FYI the version you saw is the extended TV cut which was put together by the producers because they got paid per minute running time, so they put in every frame which was shot. This version was NOT approved by the director as it included too many unnecessary footage. The Directors version runs 151 minutes and is also available.
If you watch Superman II make sure you also watch the Directors Cut afterwards which is known as the Donner Cut and is considered widely to be superior to the theatrical version. Cheers.
Thank you, will do :)
❤ Never a waste of time, babe. When they were hyping up this movie, they used "you'll believe a man can fly." We ate it up. Clark running next to the train was cheesy, and we didn't care. Little Lois' mom on the train was Noell Neill. TVs Lois Lane for George Reeves as SUPERMAN. So see, you were subconsciously linking them together. SMALLVILLE was enjoyable. LOIS AND CLARK, surprisingly, is also enjoyable. Clark goes home to see Martha and Jonathan on weekends. She made his costume and he's worried about being recognized. She says, "Well, there's one thing for sure. Nobody's going to be looking at your face." Way to go, Mom!
Thank you so much 🙏
They actually tipped their hat to the Fleischer studios animated Superman. "Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound, the mysterious stranger from Krypton, The Man of Steel, SUPERMAN!"
45:33 "Oh, well _hold on,_ now. Let's not be too hard on Frisky, okay? We all get a little afraid of heights, now and again."
Well, I mean _maybe._ But have you ever seen a cat skeleton up a tree? Of _course_ not. Cats don't stay in trees long enough to die. They find their way back _down_ again. They don't need to be _rescued._ It may take a while, but they always find their way back _down._
The producers had Christopher Reeve dub over the voice of the younger actor (Jeff East) without Jeff's knowledge.
In the train racing scene: The woman on the train is the 1950s TV Lois Lane. The father is the VERY first movie Superman, Kirk Alyn. :-)
Oh gosh, it looks like you may be watching the SUPER expanded version that was done especially for airing on ABC TV. The theatrical version is much shorter than this. The producers basically went back and added a whole bunch of of footage that was cut by director Richard Donner. This was to make a two-part, four hour version (with commercials) to air over two nights. The theatrical has MUCH better pacing!
About the green crystal...yeah, I think they screwed up when they made Jor-El's education crystal green, I'm sure many people thought it was actually Kryptonite...which of course actually does make an appearance later in the film. Really enjoying the reaction - looking forward to Part 2!
I saw it when it came out, 9 years old, and I never confused it with Kryptonite. Kryptonite is a rock; this was a green glowing crystal. Brando repeatedly uses the words "crystals" which is not synonymous with meteorite.
@@TommyBBQBessinger do you mean *Richard Donner*, the director, or Jeffrey Dahmer, the serial killer?
@@TommyBBQBessinger Who is Jeffrey Dalmer? Are you talking about the serial killer? Do you mean Richard Donner? The Superman II "Richard Donner" cut? There are tons of glaring differences. First off, they cut Marlon Brando out of the theatrical cut so they wouldn't have to pay him a second time (the first two Supermans were filmed at the same time). The Donner cut restores all his scenes and cuts out the lame ones they replaced him with, the reshoots with Susannah York. There is WAY more Lois Lane and Clark, and some of the plot points are changed (for instance, she suspects he's Superman a lot more). There is also more Gene Hackman, though he quit during Superman II when they fired Richard Donner, so there's still not everything that was originally written. The Donner cut is way better. Unfortunately, they have to recycle Superman turning back time because it was originally part of Superman II and moved to Superman I at the last minute.
Thank you for clarifying :) I don't mind the pacing of this either 😇
He walked from Kansas to the Artic Circle ..the North Pole to create the Fortess of Solitude the home base of Superman on Earth and a piece of his former home.
I think that is meant to symbolize both Moses' journey out of Egypt and Jesus' forty days in the wilderness.
The mother on the train played Lois Lane in the 1950's TV show.
Something Reeves embodies, that no other actor has captured, is that both Clark and Superman are disguises, and only Kal-El is real. One was developed to survive on Earth and the other is a paragon of virtue, but both are facades that Kal must keep up unless he is alone.
There is a tragedy in the loneliness of Superman, a God trapped among mortals, that never really gets delved into in the movies.
So true! Well said 👏
When you watch Smallville, you will enjoy. The whole series is about Clark's coming of age story
Can't wait 😍
Superman's first flight here was back in the fortress of solitude after listening to the hologram speech from his father Jor-El.
43:52 "And he looks jacked without _being_ jacked. You can see that he didn't really, like, _take_ anything."
Well, I mean, you can lift weights to develop _mass._ That's what most people think of. But _larger_ muscles tend to be more _conspicuous._
You can also lift weights to develop _strength_ or muscular _endurance._ That creates an equally impressive physique, but people with this kind of muscle tend _not_ to stand out so much.
This version is the longest version of Superman the Movie some scenes are only included in the deleted scenes section of the special edition DVD set. Where did you find this version because I would love to watch it myself in full? Thank you!
19:34 "I mean, every time I get the _football,_ I can make a _touchdown."_
Or a _field_ goal. But understand, the reason people group sports into _leagues_ is to make sure that one's competitors have a comparable _skill_ level so there's uncertainty about who's going to _win._
Imagine a competition between two people with a severe _imbalance_ in their skill level. The one with _less_ skill isn't really having fun, because they know they're gonna _lose._ But the one with _more_ skill isn't having any fun _either,_ because they know they're gonna _win._
This being the case, Clark, how long do you think it would take for you to get _bored_ with football?
Christopher Reeve wasn't into steroids. Of course he trained hard in the gym for his role as Superman.
A really great movie. A Superman movie with the gold standard of Superman Christopher Reeve may he rest in peace. This movie is the first modern superhero movie the one that started the all modern super hero movie genre and Superman is my all time favorite super hero.
Well the reason being is that the story of Superman have been told countless numbers of times and some of the story have been ommited because most people is familiar with it. The newer generation is starting to get 'refamiliar' with the character. Maybe a director will include it with the next movie...who knows?
George REEVES was Superman in the Adventures of Superman from the 1950’s. Christopher REEVE was this Superman-THE Superman in my view. Also, the green crystal his father gave him is totally different than green Kryptonite which are radioactive “chunks” or dust from the planet after it exploded.
The phone booth thing was a huge thing at the time cause it was around that time that phone booths began disappearing in favor of the kiosks that would, in themselves, would disappear due to lack of use in the 2000s.
The green glowing crystal wasn't Kryptonite. It's the green crystal Jor-El put in baby Superman's pod before sending him off. Clark used the green crystal to create his fortress of solitude.
"Superman Returns wasn't that bad"
Indeed, sadly it came out with two big elements against it: one, the weight of the previous Superman films (and Christopher Reeve's performance, since it tried to be a sequel of these films) and the many failed attempts to make continuations of comic films at the time. Superman Returns came out in 2006, around the same year as X-Men: The Last Stand, Elektra, Fantastic Four (feautring Chris Evans), Ghost Rider and Spider-Man 3; and sandwiched between the darker Batman Begins and The Dark Knight.
Yep, it was a time when several comic adaptations didn't know what formula worked (for context: Iron Man wouldn't come out until 2008).
"I keep saying Reeves, for some reason"
While that's a honest mistake... you are not that "in the wrong" XD: before this film, the most popular adaptation of Superman was a black and white TV Series where Superman was played by George Reeves.
"That's Kryptonite?"
No, kryptonite are the mineral remains of planet Krypton that reached earth as meteorites; that can be described as a control crystal (the film really never gives an answer why it's green and not dark blue, to be more in tune with the character XD), but yeah: they are not adding radioactive or poisonus materials to the ship.
In Man of Steel, they kind of addressed this isue and replaced control elements or keys with these sort of "graphite sticks" stamped with the symbol of the owner.
"I didn't get that time moves differently in Krypton"
Well, that (because "measuring time" is a human concept, so every race can measure it the way they want), but also time moves differently in space, moving at high speeds (the concept is part of the Theory of Relativity and is called "Time Dilation" and, fun fact, you are a victim of it each time you move faster than others, like in a plane: by mere miliseconds, your clock ticks faster or slower based on the relative speed you move from others and others move around you).
Yes, Kal-El experienced a trip of some years (more less), but if his ship was travelling at the speed of light (or very nearly), time inside the ship actually ticks slower than observers outside. So yeah, by the time he gets to earth his "some years" translate to thousands of our years, depending on the distance between Krypton and Earth (by the time the film was made, there was no canon in the comics on where Krypton was located, so yeah... Krypton pretty much is a "land far, far away").
"I like the meditating aspect of becoming Superman..."
Indeed... and that's why several people didn't like Man of Steel. Don't get me wrong, I like the film; but yeah: Superman always was meant to be the "bright ideal", the aspiration of what humanity (as individuals and as a collective) can be. Man of Steel, though, tried to make Superman darker and grittier after the success of the more realistical modern Batman adaptations (and that's why you get an over the top Jonathan Kent's death in a tornado).
Superman could be darker or face with the more ambiguous moreality of our times? Yes, but the spirit of the character is to always come out as the best version of us... and that's where Man of Steel detoured a lot (focusing more in the burden of his powers and character and the neverending emotional toll it takes; that's why even the Man of Steel Jor-El feels like a tragic figure, and not that much of a guide XD).
Choices where made (oh, and one of those choices was, precisely, skip all the "forming years" to save time and get right into the action, because we are no longer used to films being almost three hours long). Also, Superman crashing in a mountain on his first flight is a nice touch... but when you consider that the time he spent with Jor-El was to master all his powers, in a safe environment, you see why you can't have that scene in this film (Jor-El doesn't release Superman into the world without the basics covered; while in Man of Steel, Jor-El didn't cover much of the flying manual, for what it seems XD). Again, choices were made (and some tried to tone down Superman from being just "too perfectly adjusted" to his powers).
"How Clark looks so natural as a nerd?"
Kudos to Christopher Reeve, who nailed the character, because it takes a good actor to make that awkardness work without looking forced (and kudos to Brandon Routh, because you have to keep in mind he is playing a continuation of this exact same character and nailed many of the mannerisms, he basically had to copy Reeve's acting style).
As time went on, though, they tuned down Clark's "nerdness" to make him more socially capable (making more unbelievable that no one notices he is Superman in the process). It's not a bad choice, as such... but yeah, some charm was lost by tuning down what the character does.
"That cop looks like a security guard"
That's, actually, the New York City police uniform of the 1970's (the police cars are also the standard livery of NYPD of that time). Which makes sense, New York is doubling as Metropolis in this film and safety and uniforms were something very different back then.
And that would be it, for now. See you in the next part.
Thank you for explaining 😊
That plane was Air force One, the Presidents plane. The very original version mentioned the President liking peanuts, Carter, but that got deleted by the 80s as to not date the movie.
This is the extended cut, and it's generally inferior to the original theatrical version. Most of the "restored footage" was edited for a reason, in 1978.
_Thank you._ Film editors exist for a reason.
Some Big Apple lore: the 'Oh Hi Rex' was said to Rex Reed, a big film and stage critic of the time.
The _Daily Planet_ building was actually the _New York Times_ building.
The first two Superman movies were originally supposed to be one long movie, that might have been why so much time was spent on his early years. It wasn't all that much time for what was likely a 4 hour movie.
9:55 It’s not kryptonite it’s a computer crystal.
Kryptonite will come into being after the planet explodes.
The radioactive debris from the planet Krypton is Kryptonite
43:18, I know exactly how you feel. I saw this movie in the theaters when I was 10 years old. It’s such an old fashioned non ironic hero moment, you can’t help but be happy watching it.
The only superhero movie moment that I think comes close is the portal openings at the end of Avengers: Endgame.
My older brother took me to see this movie in the theater when it came out. Great memories. Love the John William's score
That's wonderful 😊
Amazing masterpiece Superman directed by Richard Donner starring Marlon Brando, Gene Hackman, Christopher Reeve, Margot Kidder, Ned Beatty, Glenn Ford, Terence Stamp, Sarah Douglas, Jack O'Halloran, Marc McClure, Jackie Cooper and the iconic music score by John Williams. The soundtrack of the film is the song "Can You Read My Mind" performed by Maureen McGovern. This film has sequels Superman II, Superman III, Supergirl (1984) starring by Helen Slater and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. Thank you Shree great reaction excellent 🙂🙂🙂🙂
Thanks for watching ❤
@@ShreeNation😊😊😊
In the comics the Phantom Zone is an out-of phase environment like a ghost world and the prisoners are ghostly folk who don't age or eat. Supes has visited the Zone to rescue folk, of course. "He laminated them!" - yup.
He's the only survivor till Supergirl came
This was the first movie I’ve ever seen at the cinema. The advertisement was “you will believe a man can fly”. And I did.
I never noticed that it takes over 50 minutes to actually get to Superman. I usually HATE when movies do that, but I guess I've just not noticed the movies that have done it right! - Because I just thought about it. This film is so entertaining while you're waiting for Supes that the waiting isn't even slightly a bother.
Agreed!
If no one's pointed it out yet, Superman Returns is a sequel to Superman 2. Which tells you something about Superman 3. (4 never happened)
😆💀
Superman changing in a phone booth was a thing in the times before this film.
Hah, nice!
you're absolutely right modern movies are so fast paced that they don't have time for little moments that keep you interested (human moments) we have lost something in films
Gene Hackman plays Lex Luthor here.
I'm kind of jaded on what superman is supposed to represent. So I tend not to like these movies. But I can acknowledge that this is probably the most complete portrayal.
of course he is the best Superman thats never been disputed, ever.
The Supes reveal, then the helicopter save scene. Insane. Best hero movie of all-time. No competition.
Great reaction Shree. I 100% agree with you to many movies now are worried about time and speed through telling a good story. I love the scene with the father because it shows how important a good father is in young man's life. As boy we are sometime rambunctious, trying to impress, or push boundaries, but a good father gives you humility and makes sure to teach not to do frivolous things. To be a good man. His father's death was key as Clark realized even with powers you cannot save everyone especially for natural causes. Christopher Reeve's will always be iconic in the role, and he took it seriously. Even Henry Cavil who was amazing...wanted to not ruin what Christopher Reeve's set as the standard. Both men are amazing as Superman and Clark. Also, a note the movies hits to all the powers Superman has, but beyond that Superman was intelligent. He used his brain as much as his power to defeat his enemies.
Thank you 🙏
1. We recently lost Otis/Ned Beatty 😇
Damn, rest in peace :(
Richard Donner explained that the green crystal wasn't kryptonite, it was a Kryptonian "sun stone" construction crystal.... just pre-programmed to build the Fortress of Solitude and to stop there. It glowed green because it was supercharged with energy and data.
Thanks for letting me know 🙏
1:11 Well, original Batman movie would probably be the 1966 one with Adam West. Unless you count the 1943 theatrical serial (Superman also had one in 1948).
3:54 It's pretty much thanks to Reeve movies that the mainstream public knows Lex Luthor, general Zod and just about no other Superman villain. Which is why it's next to impossible to get a movie with someone like Brainiac as the main bad guy off the ground.
7:16 No, not really. Just using Zod, because again, average Joe knows only two villains. Superman Returns was a spiritual sequel to this and Superman 2 (ignoring Superman 3 and 4).
9:43 If it was kryptonite, it'd be hurting Brando too. Kryptonite is the remnants of exploded Krypton that got irradiated and that hasn't happened yet.
16:49 Well, he's not so much nerd as just a simple farmboy. All that bumbling he sometimes does as a reporter's been toned down over the decades, but he's just a simple guy who believes in good.
18:20 That's what Smallville pretty much became all about. A bit too much. Everyone from Superman's life started showing up. Here's Lois Lane, here's Parry White, here's Bruce Wayne, here's general Zod. It kinda lost me when it became so much about references to other characters.
20:48 Jonathan Kent being dead is a thing that flip-flops depending on the current retcon, but if he does die, it's usually of some heart attack as a metaphor for Clark still not being able to save everyone.
45:45 Yeah, cause that was just about the only good scene of that movie. The one scene that kinda felt like a Superman movie, where there was some charm, optimisim and color. That's like the only time he smiles in that film.
Thank you for explaining :)
Ok so this film if I remember correctly was practically shot for shot from one of Superman's comic books. The green shard isn't exactly Kryptonite it's a memory crystal and yes it built a structure that would've been found on his original planet. Kryptonite itself is a piece of the destroyed planet itself.
Thank you for clarifying ❤
It’s great you’re watching the 3-hour extended TV cut. Can’t wait to see Part 2.
Premiering in 2 hours!
I heard somewhere that what clinched it for him getting the part, was the way he looked in those glasses.
You caught that it was Reeve in the credits, but then said "Reeves" in your reaction and wrote it in the description. George Reeves played him in the TV show.
George Reeves played Superman in a movie serial and a TV show in the 1950s.
The actress who played Lois Lanes mom was the Lois Lane from the George Reeves Superman from the 50s
The green crystal next to the baby is not kryptonite. It’s the crystal that builds the fortress of solitude and contains Jor els conscious.
Johnathan Kent never said "With great power comes great responsibility". Uncle Ben said it to Peter Parker aka Spiderman.
The green crystal was not kryptonite sweetheart, but the crystal technology of Krypton.
A scientific correction: my oldest friend (some 40 years, now) has a Master's in Environmental Engineering. The planet isn't warming a degree per year. The debate among actual climate scientists are the ramifications of temperature increasing by 1.5 degrees over the course of the next _century_ .
What you hear in the popular press and from politicians has absolutely nothing to do with what scientists are worried about.
Listen to the scientists.
AMEN! Always listen to the scientists 👏
@ShreeNation the press is particularly scientifically illiterate and politicians particularly scientifically opportunist. Not only have I had that friend since High School, we both went into scientific fields: he engineering, and me computer science. We're both early Gen-X with more than 40 years in our respective fields.
Almost everything the press ever says about computer science and IT is wrong and sensationalist; while politicians use wrong and sensationalist information to sway public opinion for their own gain.
I gave up attempting to educate the press long ago. I occasionally got a couple of reporters' ears and said I'd be happy to consult with them any time they needed background info for stories. Over the course of a long career, I taught IT at the college level and am pretty good at explaining complex topics in layman's terms.
They never contacted me. If I wanted them to understand something, I had to contact them after I'd seen them give out misinformation. They never cared.
I gave up on politicians after I sat in the reception area of one of my Senators for _three days straight_ . He sat on a subcommittee that was looking into social media. I was following it and knew for a certain fact that witnesses were purjuring themselves.
I climbed into my best suit, went to my Senator's office, and was told he didn't have time to see me. I then put out word to my colleagues all over the world (I've racked up quite a few over the decades). For three days, my Senator got calls from not just the US, but Great Britain, Canada, India, and Germany -- all begging them to please listen to what the guy in the reception area had to say.
They finally sent out some flunky who spent five minutes with me, wrote maybe two sentences, and brushed me off with: "We have people who advise us on these things."
I called out to him as he literally (not figuratively) turned his back and shut the door behind him:
"If they aren't telling you what I just did, they're giving you bad advice!"
That was over four years ago. I've not bothered to attempt to give those clowns advice since. No doubt I could get my Senator's ear with a large enough campaign contribution, but I haven't the funds for that.
The press and politicians are scientifically useless.
The young Lou's in the train, her parents played by the actress and actor that played Loud Lane and Jimmy Olsen on the old TV series.
Kirk Allen and Noel Neill. Clark and Lois from the late 40s movie serials.
1st time on your channel, mostly because you are reacting to SUPERMAN lol. So glad you are liking it and appreciating it. That warms my heart.
I saw this movie in the theater in 1978 I believe, with my father and, oh boy was it a huge event for everyone, because it was not only the first time to see Superman in the cinema, but also the first time to see ANY major superhero in the cinema!
My father was super excited because they got Marlon Brando and Glen Ford (Superman's 'Earth dad') to be in the movie, which was big news as they were icon actors already. The version you are watching is longer than the one I saw in the theater, so that's kinda cool too, as there's short bonus scenes here.
Hope you enjoy part 2 and also, I really hope you react to the 2nd movie, simply called SUPERMAN 2.
Thanks and keep smiling🙂👍
Glad to have you here 😊 Definitely watching Superman II soon!