Qwerty or Colemak? What's more efficient?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @WillWinder
    @WillWinder ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Touch typing instead of hunt and peck is going to be better than the layout choice.

  • @ronturble4983
    @ronturble4983 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Respectfully - layout doesn’t matter if you don’t touch type. When Sholes and the Caligraph company had a typing competition to determine which of their respective layouts was faster in the late 1800’s - the Sholes typewriter (using QWERTY) won because their competitor knew touch typing and the Caligraph competitor didn’t, subsequently putting Caligraph out of business as QWERTY was adopted. I think this shows that technique is always > than layout.

  • @anthonywspt
    @anthonywspt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    i like how you know about colemak but still hunt and peck, you gotta use all fingers and learn touch type

  • @whtaccizdis
    @whtaccizdis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Chat is this real?

  • @douglasharrington3003
    @douglasharrington3003 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They are both qwerty

    • @yuanfurbax
      @yuanfurbax ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah lol
      But I think he changed smth in software

    • @uhaevias
      @uhaevias  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I used layoutfuld on monkey type, so that I can show both layouts on one take, that's all

    • @orti1283
      @orti1283 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who the fuck uses only their right index to type