9:55 Remarkably the regularly relaxed and reserved Rosen respectfully revokes resub recitation. A Reminder for retinue to resist ruffling the ruminations of a Rosen replete with resolve to raise his rapid rating to a new record!
Hah, I watched your last two games on twich yesterday thanks to lichess' fantastic stream list feature. It was a bit past midnight, if you ever wondered if some of your watchers are chilling in the bathtub - the answer is yes. Congrats on crossing two magic numbers.
Hey Eric. You're a great player and I say with all due respect- I think in 37:40 you continuously overlooked Qc4 which threatens # and to take whatever piece lands on d4. it also bolstered up the knight attacking e6/f7 later in the continuation. Unless this was a stream-snipe bait... in that case, well played!
Can someone help me out? I'm fairly new to online chess and these chess engines. I noted when Eric was doing the analysis on game 1, his move 11 was flagged as an inaccuracy. However, the suggested move of e4 does not show up in the Stockfish analysis at the top. Where does e4 come from, then? Also, I understand that inaccuracies, mistakes, and blunders are progressively worse moves according to the analysis, but are the distinctions among them strictly a matter of centipawn losses, or are there other criteria?
When there are several moves that are roughly the best, the suggested move can change depending on how deep the engine searches (though I'm a bit surprised that e4 isn't in the top three, as it was always in the top 2 when I tried it). As for inaccuracies/mistakes/blunders, someone checked the source code and it's down to win probability changes, not centipawn loss. So maybe something like 10%/20%/40% shift in win probability. You don't want to do pure centipawn loss, as the difference between 0.0 and 3.0 is massive, whereas the difference between 7.0 and 10.0 is minimal as it's winning for white regardless.
In game 2, Eric talks about "a funny line" with his trademark "Oh, no, my queen" line. Even without Bxd4, couldn't he achieve the same with Ng5? I was looking at that before he mentioned going through d4. ... Never mind, he just saw it and played it. I would have played O-O on move 12 rather than playing Ne6+. It seemed better to me, so I checked with Stockfish, which agreed. Nc3 was its top choice, though.
Willingly witnessing wicked winning with wireless WiFi while working with wombats and wanting to waste water in wells and watching whales whine about wine
It seems to round up. He's actually better than >99.95% of rapid players, but it only shows one digit after the comma, so it rounds up to 100% would be my guess
It was mate in 1 at the end not mate in 2. You should focus more when playing chess if you want to become a good chess player in the 100th percentile….😂
Reclined relaxing reviewing Rosen's recent recording
9:55 Remarkably the regularly relaxed and reserved Rosen respectfully revokes resub recitation. A Reminder for retinue to resist ruffling the ruminations of a Rosen replete with resolve to raise his rapid rating to a new record!
Working while watching world-class winning
Eagerly enjoying Eric's excelent episode.
absolutely amazed about astute alliteration abilities
Indulging in Eric's immaculate ingenuity
Conspicuously constructing clever comments, casually.
Happily Hearting Humorous Highlights 😍
Pleasantly perceiving perspicacious pawns play En Passant.
Lovely linguistic loops in the title
excited enthusiast experiencing Eric executing exhilarating endgames
48:08 if you see mate in 1 look for better
I don’t believe there is a mate in one there?
@@TheRealFastMarcusBg5 or Bh4
@@TheRealFastMarcus Bb5, rook covers F8
@@andreasbobe5239 * Bg5... I was looking at Bb5 for like 2m going "What The?"
Also bishop h4 for extra style @@JS-tm1gq
absolutely alacritous alliteration abounds among all audience accounts
this is my favorite one
We live for the sections titles 😁
Rosen’s Remarkable Rapid Rating Rise! Riveting!🚀🌟
Obscure options over other obvious opportunities, on online opposition - outstanding 😁
Deft duck-chess diviner dutifully delivers delightful disport diaries daily
"Should I just disappear" *fades to black* LMFAO
I love this video type Eric. So informative and cool to see through the eyes on an IM
Your calm videos are a great addition to my calculus study nights! Also I love the wordplay so much
Eric's exalted ELO elegantly elates: exciting! Exuding experience, Eric executes effortless endgames, eliciting enthusiasm. Every expert eagerly echoes Eric's extraordinary exploits, elevating exemplar, elitist expertise.
Awesome alliteration.
Gripped by that first game, nice one Eric.
I saw this on twitch while working..Good u posted it later because my connection was poor then
Eric, I wanted to personally apologize for not clicking 'like' on all of your videos.
Love it, thanks. Do you have suggestions for a daily training program, such as tactics, opening, middle-game and endgame practice.
What a great few games too!! The tactics were so fun to watch in the last game
Hah, I watched your last two games on twich yesterday thanks to lichess' fantastic stream list feature. It was a bit past midnight, if you ever wondered if some of your watchers are chilling in the bathtub - the answer is yes. Congrats on crossing two magic numbers.
I had to go to the optometrist after 27:15 because I was seeing arrows everywhere and bumping into things.
Purveying picturesque posts, parallelly pooping
lol 😂
Hey Eric. You're a great player and I say with all due respect- I think in 37:40 you continuously overlooked Qc4 which threatens # and to take whatever piece lands on d4. it also bolstered up the knight attacking e6/f7 later in the continuation. Unless this was a stream-snipe bait... in that case, well played!
Glad I could help with the video title :D
I love the fact that the chapter markers have alliteration too. ❤
Just got home from work! Love videos, Eric :)
Congrats!
I acknowledge your comment as existing
Congrats on the record! Only up from here.
At 43:26 why not knight g5 to f7?
Rosen's Rook’s rapid retreat rattled rival ranks.
Complexzeta must be a mathematician
Congrats! Last game felt so one-sided. It felt easier than the London game in the speedrun.
So the plan today is to sacrifice my plans and just watch Eric doing ELO lifting. Okay.
Rosen's arrows are getting Hikaru like in their complexity
Congrats for the new high!
41:25 what blacks can do, if you go Kn f7? If he takes with Kn, you mate with Queen. If ge don't, you take Rock or Kn.
Terrific tutorial, truly tasteful tactics today ❤
How about Knight to f7 at 41:40 ?
Next: "Pushing past previous personal peak performance points"
How did that last fish get a 2400 rating?
Eric: I need to focus
Some guy: 10:58
I can't keep coming up with cool and clever cliches
i love that he has an 🚑 in his name now 😂
We making it out of International Master with this one 🔥🔥🔥
Can someone help me out? I'm fairly new to online chess and these chess engines. I noted when Eric was doing the analysis on game 1, his move 11 was flagged as an inaccuracy. However, the suggested move of e4 does not show up in the Stockfish analysis at the top. Where does e4 come from, then? Also, I understand that inaccuracies, mistakes, and blunders are progressively worse moves according to the analysis, but are the distinctions among them strictly a matter of centipawn losses, or are there other criteria?
When there are several moves that are roughly the best, the suggested move can change depending on how deep the engine searches (though I'm a bit surprised that e4 isn't in the top three, as it was always in the top 2 when I tried it).
As for inaccuracies/mistakes/blunders, someone checked the source code and it's down to win probability changes, not centipawn loss. So maybe something like 10%/20%/40% shift in win probability. You don't want to do pure centipawn loss, as the difference between 0.0 and 3.0 is massive, whereas the difference between 7.0 and 10.0 is minimal as it's winning for white regardless.
@@lmabacus404didn't knew that the engine calculated win probabilities
Bro is stunning in the thumbnail
It's still the way up, only a peak when you start losing (or drawing) again
Question: In the last game after opponent moves Nh6, what's wrong with the fork on Nf7?
Got it. Be6. Nevermind. Looked appealing for a moment.
Congratulations 🎉
Chess champion conquering consecutive challengers, cheers! 🎉
Hey, just hit my peak bullet rating today. Feels good man.
congrats!!
When is the GM title coming?
You are better than 100% of the rapid players..
..so even better than yourself!
How is he not a gm
🎵Down among the sheltering pawns ... 🎶
Working while watching Eric peaking
I love the section titles
Bravo!
peak IMrosen
“What is your rating on Lichess?”
“23”
“Huh? How can you be that low?”
“😏”
You may play a good winning game, but I blunder way better than you! I need to start asking every move, "What would Rosen do?"
In game 2, Eric talks about "a funny line" with his trademark "Oh, no, my queen" line. Even without Bxd4, couldn't he achieve the same with Ng5? I was looking at that before he mentioned going through d4. ... Never mind, he just saw it and played it.
I would have played O-O on move 12 rather than playing Ne6+. It seemed better to me, so I checked with Stockfish, which agreed. Nc3 was its top choice, though.
This video is rated RRRRR!
11:00 I really laughed
RRRRR in title. Śmiechłem.
adamantly awaiting another angry armadillo (did I do it right)
Terrific Tautogram, thy. Truly technically tantalizing: timely, thoughtfully treaded, totally thrilling! (Yeah, you did great).
Last move for the last game was mate in 1, why calculate for mate in 2 lmao.
leets goo
First opponent was def stream sniping
Always play f3
He is up four connected passed pawns ..... "That was an intense game". What is relaxed for you being 2 queens up from the start? 😅
Willingly witnessing wicked winning with wireless WiFi while working with wombats and wanting to waste water in wells and watching whales whine about wine
how can you better than 100.0% of all rapid players?
It seems to round up. He's actually better than >99.95% of rapid players, but it only shows one digit after the comma, so it rounds up to 100% would be my guess
Interesting
hi
rah
These titles are getting out of hand
It was mate in 1 at the end not mate in 2. You should focus more when playing chess if you want to become a good chess player in the 100th percentile….😂