That's how all Brit bike speedometers - most made by Smiths - used to work. Easier to watch your speed when you are bent over, chin just above the tank filler cap, with the throttle wide open.
@@dant9869 It needs them as well, the standard ones on the RE look terrible to me😂 The sound is always going to be different, one is a single the other a twin. Exhaust note is always subjective, you pay your money and you take your choice. Having said that, who knows when you would actually receive a BSA!
@@JeremyHollier I do like the sound of standard ones on my Interceptor, but I agree that they look a bit crap. I would like the BSA to do well as healthy competition is a good thing. Also more choice for riders who don't necessary want to spend 10k on a triumph or something similar.
I really think the RE looks better, and I would definitely consider buying one if it was available here in the UK. haha Im joking but I really think RE looks better,
i think the BSA looks more like the original, but the interceptor just looks like a super clean retro bike. i’ll probably go for the interceptor since i’m in the states too, and i like the black and red paint scheme.
The RE rides fantastically, threw away the stock slip-ons changing to custom shaved nearly 8kgs off the bike. Instantly nimbler, leans easier with a more muscular growl coming from the twins. In essence, the interceptor is sportier compared to the more laid back BSA. I love my interceptor to bits
Excellent review! There are people who complain about the valve clearance check intervals on the RE with it's uncompicated air-cooled engine, but forget about the maintenance required on a water cooling system. A pump to maintain, potential rust in the lines, fluid change every four years. And yes, there is that radiator!
Yeah, the maintenance doesn't sound that bad. They seem to have a good warranty and if you get it from a decent dealership can probably just take it in during the three-year warranty period (I think it's 3 years anyways).
Is the valve clearance check and adjust as easy to do for yourself on the BSA as it is on the RE? Or is it a mandatory "take the bike to the dealer and wait and $pay$" situation?
R.E Glitter & Dust with chrome black & gold stripes magnificent & Mk 2 with chrome & red strip tanks look better than the BSA.So you can get a R.E with chrome tank & buy a Glitter & Dust tank on line if you prefer R.E but like the chrome tank of BSA. Pity all BSA engine casings aren't polished like the top model it cheapens the look & looks plastic. Also to many colours around engine casings on BSA too.
Until you look closely, the chrome is diabolical. My Classic 350 bronze chrome is like a mirror but the BSA I looked at at my dealer was etched with a mesh of fine striations that makes it look like a steamed up mirror. To me the whole bike standing next to mine looks like a cheaper product but costs nearly double (I know it’s a bigger bike), very disappointing tbh. I wonder if the top model has a better finish but not seen anyone reviewing the Silver Line yet.
Great review Mr Darcy, I had the same thoughts when test riding them, I was a little let down by the BSA as it had me out of the seat twice over a section of road I tested them on, the Enfield however, didn't, the other thing on the BSA was the clunky engine, the counter balance shafts stop vibration but not the clunk and It doesn't rev out like the Enfield, the rev limiter kicks in to soon. The Enfield has more top end power and speed and carves through corners with more verve. The Enfield for me. Keep up the great reviews.
@@hiddenmortimer5189 Hi, I'm 5'10" I found both have good leg room, the Enfield sits you a little more forward and the BSA more upright, both are comfortable.
The BSA looks best from the offside, the Enfield looks great from either side, single versus twin will mostly come down to personal preference I suspect. Good review.
A good honest no nonsense review and very enjoyable ! Both good looking bikes, but i prefer the Interceptor ! i always look forward to your next review !
I prefer the Royal Enfield although the mufflers should be more like the BSA . whay i like about the RE is the ease of working on it . Also the RE is more refined and smoother being a twin
Nice review Darcy! Do hope your Dad is healing well. Hard for me to be objective as an INT 650 owner. Here are my thoughts: 1) BSA liquid cooling. Like has been already mentioned in other comments, there is complication and extra maintenance. Bike water pumps generally separate the engine oil and coolant by a seal or o-ring. They are known to fail with age. Plus 1 for the Interceptor. 2) Low slung pea shooter exhaust can is great looking. The rest of the exhaust and shield looks awful. 3) Tank looks excellent on the BSA and that Highland Green color is my favorite. 4) Interceptor seat comfort is often a complaint. Other reviews have stated the BSA seat is more comfy. 5) BSA? Where are they? After stating that the Goldstar was to be produced in the UK nothing more has been said. So, what did Mahindra do? Take the small number of display models, cut down the exhaust shield and 2 years later make a few available for testing all the while pushing for deposits? Smells a bit fishy to me. 6) The BSA has genuine Brembo brakes which the MCN review showed shorter stopping distance. Of course, they had to kill 'Elvis' to do it. 7) RE's new lineup is proving to be reliable. Not perfect, but positive. They are establishing more Dealer arrangements. Parts are reasonably available and RE accessories are reasonably priced. What about BSA? 8) Handling is supposedly better on the Interceptor. With the brilliant Harris designed frame/chassis does that come as a surprise? 9) And finally. Sorry for the novel. I would rather have easy valve lash screw and lock nut adjusters than bucket and shim type no matter how much more often the RE's require.
@@ReignitedDrifter It's fine here in Texas, USA. We don't have emissions or DB level testing for motorcycle state inspections. In the US, many of our laws vary by state, so it may be illegal in other states, just not here in Texas.
@@Big_DT The best things about the 650s is more are coming your way, classic 650 which is styled in a proper retro manner is coming this October to India, so maybe January will be the US launch date, then there is ultra retro Bullet 650. ROYAL ENFIELD IS ALSO IN THE MAKING OF A 750cc ENGINE DERIVED FROM THE SAME 650, BUT MAYBE IT WILL BE A MODERN TAKE AS IT WILL FIRST SIT IN HIMALAYAN FOR A MIDDLE WEIGHT ADV TOURER.
What impressed me most about the Interceptor, over the BSA was the potential for CUSTOMISING, built-in! It is such a good bike out of the box, just like the Goldstar, BUT, it was designed to accept an infinite variety of customisation, and performance parts, allowing you to, for a VERY reasonable price, build the bike to your own specs! The BSA is a tribute to an existing and ICONIC machine, and would feel "wrong" if you started messing with what BSA delivered! As such, the Royal Enfield DESERVES every accolade it has garnered so far, and probably is due many more in the future! The BSA will appeal to a LOT of nostalgia fans, seeking the feeling of a modern bike with classic looks. I would also like to own both, but I don't have a shed, let alone the garage space to keep them.
Excellent review. Been looking at the RE for quite a while. Love everything about it. BSA is such a classic bike and it looks spectacular. I've never ridden a single. This is a difficult choice. The upgraded intake and exhaust for this RE really works for me. Upgrade the intake and put some better rear shocks on the BSA. How would they compare then? I like the look of the BSA a little better but the look of the engine on the RE is exceptionally nice. I'd love to get both! Both would still be cheaper than any Harley...
Singles are great, the original BSA long stroke thumpers feel like the torque is on a rubber band that cushions you briefly before ramping up in power at crazy low revs. This BSA doesn't sound like it would behave that way and is a modern single underneath. Still lots of fun and loads of low end torque. The RE twins would just be more versatile, less strain at higher motorway speeds. If it was only one bike I owned it probably wouldn't be a single but if I had two the second would more than likely be a single :)
Never ridden a single? Over 99.99% of people here in India have never ridden anything with more than one cylinder. You ought to test ride the Bullet 350 and the BSA. Singles have their own charm and, because they seem so much more vulnerable, much easier to feel protective about and to fall in love with.
If you can get to ride a classic Brit single you will experience the effect of the heavy flywheel; the rhythm never breaks, not even when you go too slow in any gear, and the bike will then accelerate smoothly without any jerkiness. Our grand daddies who rode them were truly pampered.
The twins sounds amazing, listen to both using an earphone and the RE sounds amazing.. RE all the way.. Nice video.. The rubber spring on the RE shock absorber are added so there is no dirt that enters the exhaust.. 👍
I think the Beeza just has it on the full "Classic" look, the RE is more of a classic/modern mix with the lights and suspension etc. I reckon the gold anodised rear shocks on the RE are trying to mimic Ohlins units, hardly necessary IMO. Single vs Twin, similar power maybe but completely different feel, just choose which you prefer. You hit on an important point with the current supply and delivery issues. That coupled with the RE now being a well known and proven marque could swing many a potential BSA buyer's decision.
Sad, but thats exactly what will make people choose the RE over the BSA. A lot of small things, but especially with that center stand, it adds up in the RE's favor
Great on-the-road videos and comparison! The BSA's styling is tops; the RE is a better overall bike at this point. Personally, I am waiting to see how the BSA fairs reliability wise, for an updated suspension, and for aftermarket accessories to become available. Also, there are rumours about new RE 650 models coming soon, namely a Continental GT with USD forks, mag wheels and tubeless tires, plus a 650 Classic. I now own an '06 Honda ST 1300 and an '06 Yamaha Roadliner S (1854 cc air cooled V-Twin). Will have to thin the herd a bit (including a car or two) in order to purchase a BSA and a Royal Enfield..........
First proper head to head review I've seen, well done for that. I think the RE looks and sounds better whereas the BSA is essentially a jawa. That said the BSA is a rotax lump so super reliable (jawa are very reliable despite popular belief) and wont need touching, unlike the RE which has silly valve servicing requirements. Annoyingly the rotax is said to be capable of 90 bhp but restricted due to jawa frame shocks etc, but this may be possible to liberate. Given the choice I'd probably go BSA for the proven rotax engine and I love the feel of a big single. Looking forward to the review of the Meteor, it's the first RE I've sat on that feels big enough. I definitely trust your opinion compared to other reviews. Sorry for the essay.
I have sat on both the interceptor and the super meteor. I am 6'4" and weirdly I felt more cramped on the meteor. I was hitting the tank emblems with my knees.
You should probably check out MCN and Nevsey's comparison test a couple of weeks ago, at least he comes to a conclusion instead of just sitting on the fence. This was just regurgitating what we already know. BTW, there is no way the BSA/Rotax can reliably make 90hp, perhaps a race engine that gets rebuilt every 100 hours of running but not an everyday road bike. For reference, the 2022 Honda crf450r makes around 50hp and needs a top end rebuild, new piston and rings every 150 hours, oil changes every 10 hours, majorly expensive to run.
@@onecookieboy Seems a bit harsh. I think Darcy does a good job, v professional. I know he's not been road legal long but he seems more clued up than a lot of born again "reviewers". I'd trust his opinion to be unbiased and honest when compared to MCN's. The more reviews the better to form a real picture. I'm inclined to agree with you that it's unlikely a single like that would make 90hp but who knows, maybe at a push, at the crank? Until we get our hands on the bikes, we're all just regurgitating. As for the crf, yes it is after all..........Honda lol.
@@motorbikerscosmeticcompany1594 TBH I think the vast majority of YT reviewers, whether it's bikes or cars, are just trying to put out content and to get looks and likes because that's what gets them the $'s from YT. Because of this they are reluctant to say anything negative about a product because they might not get the opportunity to review other products from the suppliers. The MCN head to head on these two bikes was much more balanced and there was a clear preference for the RE.
Nice job Mr. Darcy. I'm all in on the BSA if it ever gets to the States. I'd be keener on the Enfield if the maintenance schedule was equal to the BSA. We're lucky we have a choice of such nice bikes.
Am from India ,yesterday I was done bsa test at gujarat ,low end perfomance was goods to handle in city easily, but highway compare to RE, perfomance was not upto the level
The verdict of these test rides was a good one in the fact it boils down to which bike you prefer the most. The big thing in all this is that India has opened up the retro market up even wider and with Royal Enfield's new range of bikes the world is your oyster. As far as the saving of the name Norton I do hope that as well as the top of the range machines they design a more affordable machine for the guy on the street, just as back in the early days the Norton International was out of most riders price range but there were plenty of more affordable models to chose from with the Norton name on the tank.
I thought from the first release that the Interceptor is a lovely bike but looked 'heavy'. Seeing it alongside the BSA, it looks more so. I still love it though, as you say, they just have different characteristics on a similar theme. I wish I could afford both but can't even buy one! 😕 Thanks for another great review.
Fairly done. Riders preferences on soft and wallowing or stiff and bumpy, water or aircooled, deep sound or a more edgy sound makes a difference. I expect riders will boil their choices down to the appearances. Personally I'd say a bit more money and buy the Triumph T100.
Test rode the Interceptor. Wasn't expecting massive performance obviously but it didn't have much character. Saw both side by side yesterday. Not much between them but the top of the range BSA tipped it on looks. Radiator was not an issue in the flesh If the single cylinder engine has more character then that's the one I'd go for.
Great head to head comparison. As an Interceptor owner since 2020, I am bound to be slightly biased, but when I test rode the BSA, as much as I tried not to compare the two, I found it difficult to do so. In my opinion, the Interceptor looks better in all aspects. I am not overly keen on the instrumentation on the BSA, as classically styled as it is, and the idiot lights are hard to see at a glance due to being located at the top of the headlight. I prefer the power delivery from the Interceptor, the suspension on the Interceptor is a bit harsh out of the crate compared to the BSA, but I fitted a pair of inexpensive preload spacers at the front which worked a treat, and YSS Goldtop shocks on the rear which are just fantastic once dialled in. I found the rear shocks on the BSA to be a tad soft. The Interceptor has a far sportier feel, with the BSA feeling a more laid back, almost cruiser ish. I hope to take the BSA out again in the spring, as when I rode it, the temp was -3 (I think), and the roads were wet and greasy, not ideal conditions. In my review, I do state that I wouldn’t exchange either my Interceptor or Classic 350 for a BSA, and I stand by that. Thanks for putting this comparison up, I appreciate how much time it takes to put this together. Cheers
@@stephenwandersonea1935 obviously the 350 is down on power, but it’s a lovely ride providing acceleration and 65+ mph isn’t important to you. The laid back attitude is perfect for slow A & B roads. Plus, wherever you stop, people of a certain age just come up and chat. No doubt they would with the BSA too though.
@@pradippradhan5014 without wanting to self promote on someone else's channel, if you tap on my symbol, I do ride vids on both, and talk about them a great deal. At the end of the day, it's down to personal choice, as to whichever feels right to you. Both the 650 and 350 are great at what they do. If speed is never an issue then the 350 will be fine. If however, you want to let rip occasionally, then the 650. Hope this helps.
Excellent review! Having driven the interceptor for a few thousand kilometres on all kinds of roads and seasons (except for snow), I can definitely agree that it is an excellent motorcycle, be it for touring or on the track. Plus you can customise it into whatever you want as there are a number of bolt on cafe racer and scrambler kits available for it in the market. And, you will never have trouble getting parts or finding a skilled mechanic for it. That said, it can be quite a hassle when you drive in a bumper to bumper traffic situation (you could perhaps make an omelette or a kebab over the engine given the heat when driving in traffic on a particularly hot day in southern India). One must also be cautious when riding them over gravel or off-road situations (but to be fair to these motorcycles, they are built for good roads, highways and tracks). However, in my humble opinion, the BSA looks much better and more put together. I also love the clocks (I e., gauges) on it and I am completely fine with it being a big single. Can't wait to ride one and see what it feels like. Hope they bring it to our markets soon.
Thank you for the balanced view of the two bikes When it comes to parting with cash to buy one I think BSA have a long way to go to build some trust in the re established brand A mate of mine is still looking forward to getting the bike he put a deposit down a long while ago I see a lot of the RE dealers taking on BSA but with little evidence of brand support like stock I ride a Himalayan after years away Next investment will be an Interceptor Guzzi V7 or an old R Nine T
Great video again Mr Darcy I love them both and would have both 😊😊 I’ve recently tested them both and I personally prefer the BSA but by a margin The BSA sounds a lot better with the baffle removed and sounds like one one my old BSA singles 😊😊 love it 😊😊 to add I preferred the gearbox also on the BSA and had no issues with the suspension when I tested the BSA 😊😊
In a perfect world I'd have the Interceptor, Gold Star, and a W800 all in my garage. In the real world, I just have the Interceptor. Thanks for the excellent, honest, head-to-head comparison. Both bikes have a lot to offer, especially at the price.
RE service is worst, secondly RE dial are not perfect specialy fuel indicator, heating issue, foot pegs are not perfect, missing on led lights, crome gets rusted,to me RE is a junk, oil pilage from head, valve setting regular need to monitor, and so on.
With those pipes and air box, the RE sounds brilliant, although the BSA does have a nice growl with the baffles out. Both look pretty good, but only time will tell how well the BSA stands up. Concerning the engines - that’s how the BSA engines looked form the late 40s early 50s! I think what you mean is the materials used and the finish makes the BSA engine look more modern.
I've just bought the Interceptor 650 sunset-stripe model 2024. I love the looks and simplicity of the Interceptor. Most of my previous bikes were Triumph's , the last one was a 2009 Street Triple 675R.But i am getting older and don't want to ride like an hooligang on a hooligang bike what de Streety is.The Interceptor brings me back in time with lots of fun as I had on my Meriden Daytona 500 and T140.
I live here in the States and don’t know where one would go to even look at the Goldstar. The dealer network and parts distribution for Royal Enfield is ever-growing. The three-year warranty with RE is huge - not to mention the roadside assistance they offer. At this point I look at the BSA as a vapor bike. BSA needs some financial backing if they want to put even a dent in the Royal Enfield sales numbers.
🙏 Bro knows his audience 😊 Whichever bike u choose, customer is the winner Im glad RE and Mahindra aren't chasing the electric bandwagon...for the time being
Evening Darcy That Re has had a heap of ££££ put on it in extras. Crash bars,seat,exhausts just from what can be seen. Wonder how much in total cash wise?. Standard to standard, might have just been better. The bsa hasn't....had anything, from what I see. Good video though mate, hope your all good. Cooperb great dealer....and Ian a really sound bloke. Safe rides.....🏍🏁
We get what we get sometimes. In an ideal world BSA and Enfield would send us 2 bikes, but in reality we turn up and make the best of what we’re presented with 👍🏼
Usually i'm a RE fanboy talking visuals, but the BSA is awesome. The dead straight / triangular part of the frame beneath the little too fat seat always annoyed me on the interceptor. The BSA has some way more elegant lines and proportions overall out of the box. And the tank is simply to kneel down. Great comparison, thank you.
wow you just made me realize which part was always an eyesore on my neighbor's INT 650, that triangle always bothered me compared to the rest of the beauty, but it was kind of sub conscious but now that you have mentioned it, i know that triangle is definitely not proportionately beautiful with the rest of the bike.
@@Fusionaire If you look at the triangle and the frame underneath the seat, it looks like the math- root sign. Maybe that's what bothers me as a math genius 😂
Great review thank you.. both great bikes. I have yet to test the BSA myself… but my thoughts, for what they’re worth, are that just visually I don’t like the RE exhaust or piggyback shocks.. both would need replacing from day one. I couldn’t live with them.. whereas the BSA visually I absolutely could live with visually straight out of the crate. From your review it seems it’s a close call and that might just swing it for me.. enjoyed the video.. keep them coming!
I fitted a 2 into 1 exhaust saving around 12kg and a free flow air filter, these small changes have made a big difference to the performance, though it will never be a sports bike, it is though a joy to ride.
Both bikes are nice. A test ride will help as you said, because everyone should find out if you are a single or twin engine type of person. Cheers and good look with selecting “your” dreambike 👍🏼
I think you summed up the dilemma when you said that you got off *both* bikes with a smile on your face. I think it may just come down to brand loyalty. The Beezer does have a lot of catching up to do but it seems like a worthy challenger to the RE. Both are pitching at the "modern classic" market & don't forget Triumph's new 400 either. My garage could get a bit crowded...🙄
Really enjoyed this review of 2 super machines. I’ve always been a fan of the original Gold Star and for that reason, I wish I liked it the most. But, if I had to choose, I think the sound and the more ‘muscley’ look of the RE just pips it. I’d be delighted to own either or preferably, both. Thanks for the vid. Top work!
It would have to be the interceptor for me, better looking in my opinion and a dealer right on my doorstep. The BSA looks like a good bike but it is still unproven in terms of long term reliability, parts availability etc.
On paper these two bikes are so close together. What it boils down to is what flavour retro you prefer. The 60's retro look of the BSA or the 70's retro look of the RE. As for the sound, I prefer the urgent growl of the twin, to the raucous bellow of the single. In the end my choice, based on sight and sound, would be the RE (I can remember the 70's).....
I do like the design and position of the pipe on the BSA but prefer the sound of the RE both great bikes though and if I could I would own both of therm!
These are both really nice bikes and I think it’s difficult to pick between them. I have a RE Interceptor and Continental GT and was looking at changing the interceptor in the summer, the BSA is in the frame, however the RE Super Meteor complicates the decision. I do enjoy your videos.
Great video lads. I would go for the RE, but would be tempted to pick up a Kawasaki W800, they feel a bit lighter despite being heavier than the RE. Would love to see you guys review one of those.
BSA looks stunning as compared to Interceptor as the rear portion is more pleasing to eye, personally i like the big single's thump than the parallel twin engine sound. even though I am an enfield fan but goldstar is more desirable
The engine on the BSA is water cooled and made by Rotax. Whereas the RE's engine is made by RE and is air/oil cooled. The small radiator on the RE is in fact an oil cooler. Personally I would save up and buy a Triumph T120. Nice review guys 👍
I was very impressed with the recordings on the bikes - the exhaust sound coming through really clearly and fruity / throaty! Yes I prefer the sound of the twin more, and the burble on the over-run is a joy to hear! I need to get the S&S slip-ons too, and the Touring seat! I think the steeper raked forks on the RE give it an edge in the corners, a bit more flickable and quicker to drop in to a corner. It tracks a fair bit better than my old R1200RT, but that maybe suspension failing on the old heavy girl! Oh and no centre stand on the BSA, makes chain work, tyre air topping, and cleaning a lot harder without. Great review - I like the more compact nature of the RE 650 twin engine, and lots of polished aluminium - it does take a fair bit of work to keep shiny! Both pretty frugal on fuel, and both old school styling of the 60's. Graeme NZ
That was a really good comparison, one of the most comprehensive I've seen. I love both of 'em; nothing for it but one for each boot methinks. Subscribed.
I prefer the build quality and reliability of Japanese bikes. These Indian bikes are a little too crude and cheaply made for my liking. I particularly dislike buying a famous old name and slapping it on a lookalike. Hey presto the BSA Goldstar is back ! However we all look for different in our bikes and more choice is good for us all. Thanks for the vid, you still got the thumbs up 😁
I love this channel. And I love you decidedly came down on being undecided. I love my RE Interceptor, so easy to do, and now I’m thinking, I’d love a single BSA for the reasons you mentioned. I’m just not sure how to slip it by the Mrs. 😉
I do love the BSA’s Ive had two 125 batam, and 650 lighting but watching You Tube on the BSA’s and the royal Enfield I think the Royal Enfield is the better bargain in terms of looks, style, smoothness of acceleration, much nicer fittings as speed dials and controls, the exhaust sound was smooth, I would buy the Enfield and Im seriously thinking about it. Dave Hampshire
Really nice Video with a lot of great different camera Angles and a lot of information. Both of them a pretty nice Bikes but too small for me with my 6'5"
Nicely produced video once again Darcy . For me it's the interceptor, I'm 65, so it fits the 60s/70s look (my nostalgia era) .. Bsa more 50s/60s... thats apart from the RE being a known quantity, and of course a very nice bike, whether you like retro or not .
The Enfield was on my short-list when I bought a Guzzi 850 V7 a couple of years back and I think I'd still take it over the BSA. Twin cylinders, better looks and finish (are those stacked-rifle stickers on the pseudo-pushrod cover on the right of the engine?), more secure handling and established dealer backup would make the difference.
I prefer the clocks on the RE. I prefer the tank on the BSA. I prefer the engine sound on the RE (and it probably makes a better spread being a twin). It also sounds like the suspension is better. I really can't wait for the Meteor 650. I've been banging on about it since the 350 came out but the 650 engine in a Meteor would be just right for me.
Both bikes look kickass, and I think it's just a matter of preference. Both bikes have been brought up to modern specs. They both use modern tech. They both have classic looks. In the end it's ,what color,what style do you want?
A big single can never be air cooled in a new bike. Big singles have really struggled with euro standards. The re is oil cooled really. It's another area where a twin has an advantage over a single.
Small detail, but the speedo and tach being 180 degrees from "normal" on the BSA is a charming touch.
Beautiful guage cluster on the BSA
That's how all Brit bike speedometers - most made by Smiths - used to work. Easier to watch your speed when you are bent over, chin just above the tank filler cap, with the throttle wide open.
I definitely prefer the sound of the RE Interceptor, particularly on over run and when blipping to change down.
Don't forget that the Enfield has aftermarket silencers and an air filter mod. It's not standard 'off the shelf'.
@@JeremyHollier I get that Jeremy, but the BSA has a modified exhaust as well, apparently.
@@JeremyHollier RE Interceptor starts at £6039 where BSA starts from £6500. Savings on RE will be enough for a set of aftermarket silencers
@@dant9869 It needs them as well, the standard ones on the RE look terrible to me😂 The sound is always going to be different, one is a single the other a twin. Exhaust note is always subjective, you pay your money and you take your choice. Having said that, who knows when you would actually receive a BSA!
@@JeremyHollier I do like the sound of standard ones on my Interceptor, but I agree that they look a bit crap.
I would like the BSA to do well as healthy competition is a good thing. Also more choice for riders who don't necessary want to spend 10k on a triumph or something similar.
I really think the BSA looks better, and I would definitely consider buying one if it was available here in the States.
I really think the RE looks better, and I would definitely consider buying one if it was available here in the UK. haha
Im joking but I really think RE looks better,
i think the BSA looks more like the original, but the interceptor just looks like a super clean retro bike. i’ll probably go for the interceptor since i’m in the states too, and i like the black and red paint scheme.
All I can see is that radiator! It ruins the gold star
@@Metalguitarpete Paint a rainbow on it and the libs will love it
Keanu Reeves has one
The RE rides fantastically, threw away the stock slip-ons changing to custom shaved nearly 8kgs off the bike. Instantly nimbler, leans easier with a more muscular growl coming from the twins. In essence, the interceptor is sportier compared to the more laid back BSA. I love my interceptor to bits
Excellent review! There are people who complain about the valve clearance check intervals on the RE with it's uncompicated air-cooled engine, but forget about the maintenance required on a water cooling system. A pump to maintain, potential rust in the lines, fluid change every four years. And yes, there is that radiator!
Yeah, the maintenance doesn't sound that bad. They seem to have a good warranty and if you get it from a decent dealership can probably just take it in during the three-year warranty period (I think it's 3 years anyways).
I have a water cooled bike with 100,000 miles and I have never had to do anything to the pump. It's inside the motor and it takes 0 maintenance.
There may not be a pump. Thermosyphon works well.
Is the valve clearance check and adjust as easy to do for yourself on the BSA as it is on the RE? Or is it a mandatory "take the bike to the dealer and wait and $pay$" situation?
Personally, I want to love the BSA but the Royal Enfield wins hands down for me. Great review 👍🏻
You've done a great job capturing the sound! BSA looks and sounds great, but I'm keeping my Interceptor.
The RE definitely looks and sounds better over all, but the tank on the BSA is an instant classic.
Serious ? The welded lips on that tank are big enough to cause a high speed wobble....lol..take a look at the old ones...smooth...
R.E Glitter & Dust with chrome black & gold stripes magnificent & Mk 2 with chrome & red strip tanks look better than the BSA.So you can get a R.E with chrome tank & buy a Glitter & Dust tank on line if you prefer R.E but like the chrome tank of BSA.
Pity all BSA engine casings aren't polished like the top model it cheapens the look & looks plastic.
Also to many colours around engine casings on BSA too.
Until you look closely, the chrome is diabolical. My Classic 350 bronze chrome is like a mirror but the BSA I looked at at my dealer was etched with a mesh of fine striations that makes it look like a steamed up mirror. To me the whole bike standing next to mine looks like a cheaper product but costs nearly double (I know it’s a bigger bike), very disappointing tbh. I wonder if the top model has a better finish but not seen anyone reviewing the Silver Line yet.
to me bsa looks more better though the re was a little customised
The wheels on the BSA look so much better than the RE ... but the engine on the RE is better looking.
Great review Mr Darcy, I had the same thoughts when test riding them, I was a little let down by the BSA as it had me out of the seat twice over a section of road I tested them on, the Enfield however, didn't, the other thing on the BSA was the clunky engine, the counter balance shafts stop vibration but not the clunk and It doesn't rev out like the Enfield, the rev limiter kicks in to soon. The Enfield has more top end power and speed and carves through corners with more verve. The Enfield for me.
Keep up the great reviews.
How tall are you? And what do you think of the legroom on both?
@@hiddenmortimer5189 Hi, I'm 5'10" I found both have good leg room, the Enfield sits you a little more forward and the BSA more upright, both are comfortable.
I have a feeling this one will get a (well deserved) fair amount of views!
Looks wise I can't believe how good the royal enfield looks 😍
The Royal Enfield would look a LOT better with bright aluminum or chrome wheels.
I'd like the BSA fork on the Enfield!
@@xtc2v Quality anodised rims have a very robust finish.
@@geraldscott4302 and also with straight silencers
@@gustavmeyrink_2.0 not too long, classic 650 is coming up next.
The BSA looks best from the offside, the Enfield looks great from either side, single versus twin will mostly come down to personal preference I suspect. Good review.
A good honest no nonsense review and very enjoyable ! Both good looking bikes, but i prefer the Interceptor ! i always look forward to your next review !
I prefer the Royal Enfield although the mufflers should be more like the BSA . whay i like about the RE is the ease of working on it . Also the RE is more refined and smoother being a twin
The BSA has a counterbalance to smooth the motor
Just love the looks of the Enfield, toured Spain last year on my Enfield and the engine was great.
They co engineerd with triumph to build that engine and it is evident on the quality
Nice review Darcy! Do hope your Dad is healing well. Hard for me to be objective as an INT 650 owner. Here are my thoughts:
1) BSA liquid cooling. Like has been already mentioned in other comments, there is complication and extra maintenance. Bike water pumps generally separate the engine oil and coolant by a seal or o-ring. They are known to fail with age. Plus 1 for the Interceptor.
2) Low slung pea shooter exhaust can is great looking. The rest of the exhaust and shield looks awful.
3) Tank looks excellent on the BSA and that Highland Green color is my favorite.
4) Interceptor seat comfort is often a complaint. Other reviews have stated the BSA seat is more comfy.
5) BSA? Where are they? After stating that the Goldstar was to be produced in the UK nothing more has been said. So, what did Mahindra do? Take the small number of display models, cut down the exhaust shield and 2 years later make a few available for testing all the while pushing for deposits? Smells a bit fishy to me.
6) The BSA has genuine Brembo brakes which the MCN review showed shorter stopping distance. Of course, they had to kill 'Elvis' to do it.
7) RE's new lineup is proving to be reliable. Not perfect, but positive. They are establishing more Dealer arrangements. Parts are reasonably available and RE accessories are reasonably priced. What about BSA?
8) Handling is supposedly better on the Interceptor. With the brilliant Harris designed frame/chassis does that come as a surprise?
9) And finally. Sorry for the novel. I would rather have easy valve lash screw and lock nut adjusters than bucket and shim type no matter how much more often the RE's require.
I live in India and I haven't even seen a goldstar on the streets yet. Not much publicity was put into BSA tbh
@@siddharthakvr5154 Because the BSA is not sold in India.
@@himangshumahanta5398 that's fucking stupid man....why not!
@Siddhartha KVR man ...bsa is not yet launched in india...hopefully it will launch in india on coming year
After 16 years and 100.000 miles the waterpump on my bike stil works without any problems. Nothing except fluids have been changed.
That Interceptor sounds awesome with those slip-ons!
Those silencer are not legal mate
@@ReignitedDrifter Not a problem in the US.
@@Big_DT i am not sure about that.. But in most countries those modification are not street legal...
@@ReignitedDrifter It's fine here in Texas, USA. We don't have emissions or DB level testing for motorcycle state inspections. In the US, many of our laws vary by state, so it may be illegal in other states, just not here in Texas.
@@Big_DT The best things about the 650s is more are coming your way, classic 650 which is styled in a proper retro manner is coming this October to India, so maybe January will be the US launch date, then there is ultra retro Bullet 650.
ROYAL ENFIELD IS ALSO IN THE MAKING OF A 750cc ENGINE DERIVED FROM THE SAME 650, BUT MAYBE IT WILL BE A MODERN TAKE AS IT WILL FIRST SIT IN HIMALAYAN FOR A MIDDLE WEIGHT ADV TOURER.
What impressed me most about the Interceptor, over the BSA was the potential for CUSTOMISING, built-in! It is such a good bike out of the box, just like the Goldstar, BUT, it was designed to accept an infinite variety of customisation, and performance parts, allowing you to, for a VERY reasonable price, build the bike to your own specs! The BSA is a tribute to an existing and ICONIC machine, and would feel "wrong" if you started messing with what BSA delivered!
As such, the Royal Enfield DESERVES every accolade it has garnered so far, and probably is due many more in the future! The BSA will appeal to a LOT of nostalgia fans, seeking the feeling of a modern bike with classic looks. I would also like to own both, but I don't have a shed, let alone the garage space to keep them.
Great video but really down to personal choice…easy decision for me, the Interceptor without hesitation. 👊😎👍
Valves adjustment
Enfeild 12.000
BSA 47.000
That's a game changer!
The RE just looks more balanced and stylish I must declare I own one so I am biased but each looks good in its own way 🌲
I may sound odd but I would definitely buy the BSA looks with a RE engine.
Great video 👍 Interceptor all day long for me (I've got one!) but I really hope the BSA is a success
Video everyone needed. It's so hard to choose between thise two.
Excellent review. Been looking at the RE for quite a while. Love everything about it. BSA is such a classic bike and it looks spectacular. I've never ridden a single. This is a difficult choice. The upgraded intake and exhaust for this RE really works for me. Upgrade the intake and put some better rear shocks on the BSA. How would they compare then? I like the look of the BSA a little better but the look of the engine on the RE is exceptionally nice. I'd love to get both! Both would still be cheaper than any Harley...
Singles are great, the original BSA long stroke thumpers feel like the torque is on a rubber band that cushions you briefly before ramping up in power at crazy low revs. This BSA doesn't sound like it would behave that way and is a modern single underneath. Still lots of fun and loads of low end torque. The RE twins would just be more versatile, less strain at higher motorway speeds. If it was only one bike I owned it probably wouldn't be a single but if I had two the second would more than likely be a single :)
Get one! I totally love mine. I have those same S&S pipes and and the DNA air filter/box.
Never ridden a single? Over 99.99% of people here in India have never ridden anything with more than one cylinder.
You ought to test ride the Bullet 350 and the BSA. Singles have their own charm and, because they seem so much more vulnerable, much easier to feel protective about and to fall in love with.
If you can get to ride a classic Brit single you will experience the effect of the heavy flywheel; the rhythm never breaks, not even when you go too slow in any gear, and the bike will then accelerate smoothly without any jerkiness. Our grand daddies who rode them were truly pampered.
I love the BSA over the interceptor, on long run I think BSA will last for many years in my garage than interceptor.
The twins sounds amazing, listen to both using an earphone and the RE sounds amazing.. RE all the way.. Nice video.. The rubber spring on the RE shock absorber are added so there is no dirt that enters the exhaust.. 👍
To me, the BSA looks better. But the RE is good looking and likely has a more durable engine.
I think the Beeza just has it on the full "Classic" look, the RE is more of a classic/modern mix with the lights and suspension etc. I reckon the gold anodised rear shocks on the RE are trying to mimic Ohlins units, hardly necessary IMO. Single vs Twin, similar power maybe but completely different feel, just choose which you prefer. You hit on an important point with the current supply and delivery issues. That coupled with the RE now being a well known and proven marque could swing many a potential BSA buyer's decision.
Those BSA motors have been around for decades. I forget what company makes them, but they competed in flat track here in the states
The BSA needs to come with a center stand.
Sad, but thats exactly what will make people choose the RE over the BSA. A lot of small things, but especially with that center stand, it adds up in the RE's favor
Yes, no centre stand is a PITA!
the goldstar has been officially launched in India just a couple of days ago and here the centre stand can be purchased as an additional accessory
Great on-the-road videos and comparison!
The BSA's styling is tops; the RE is a better overall bike at this point.
Personally, I am waiting to see how the BSA fairs reliability wise, for an updated suspension, and for aftermarket accessories to become available.
Also, there are rumours about new RE 650 models coming soon, namely a Continental GT with USD forks, mag wheels and tubeless tires, plus a 650 Classic. I now own an '06 Honda ST 1300 and an '06 Yamaha Roadliner S (1854 cc air cooled V-Twin). Will have to thin the herd a bit (including a car or two) in order to purchase a BSA and a Royal Enfield..........
First proper head to head review I've seen, well done for that. I think the RE looks and sounds better whereas the BSA is essentially a jawa. That said the BSA is a rotax lump so super reliable (jawa are very reliable despite popular belief) and wont need touching, unlike the RE which has silly valve servicing requirements. Annoyingly the rotax is said to be capable of 90 bhp but restricted due to jawa frame shocks etc, but this may be possible to liberate. Given the choice I'd probably go BSA for the proven rotax engine and I love the feel of a big single. Looking forward to the review of the Meteor, it's the first RE I've sat on that feels big enough. I definitely trust your opinion compared to other reviews. Sorry for the essay.
I have sat on both the interceptor and the super meteor. I am 6'4" and weirdly I felt more cramped on the meteor. I was hitting the tank emblems with my knees.
You should probably check out MCN and Nevsey's comparison test a couple of weeks ago, at least he comes to a conclusion instead of just sitting on the fence. This was just regurgitating what we already know. BTW, there is no way the BSA/Rotax can reliably make 90hp, perhaps a race engine that gets rebuilt every 100 hours of running but not an everyday road bike. For reference, the 2022 Honda crf450r makes around 50hp and needs a top end rebuild, new piston and rings every 150 hours, oil changes every 10 hours, majorly expensive to run.
@@onecookieboy Seems a bit harsh. I think Darcy does a good job, v professional. I know he's not been road legal long but he seems more clued up than a lot of born again "reviewers". I'd trust his opinion to be unbiased and honest when compared to MCN's. The more reviews the better to form a real picture. I'm inclined to agree with you that it's unlikely a single like that would make 90hp but who knows, maybe at a push, at the crank? Until we get our hands on the bikes, we're all just regurgitating. As for the crf, yes it is after all..........Honda lol.
@@motorbikerscosmeticcompany1594 TBH I think the vast majority of YT reviewers, whether it's bikes or cars, are just trying to put out content and to get looks and likes because that's what gets them the $'s from YT. Because of this they are reluctant to say anything negative about a product because they might not get the opportunity to review other products from the suppliers. The MCN head to head on these two bikes was much more balanced and there was a clear preference for the RE.
Please advise…does a single not need valve adjustments?
Nice job Mr. Darcy. I'm all in on the BSA if it ever gets to the States. I'd be keener on the Enfield if the maintenance schedule was equal to the BSA. We're lucky we have a choice of such nice bikes.
Am from India ,yesterday I was done bsa test at gujarat ,low end perfomance was goods to handle in city easily, but highway compare to RE, perfomance was not upto the level
The verdict of these test rides was a good one in the fact it boils down to which bike you prefer the most. The big thing in all this is that India has opened up the retro market up even wider and with Royal Enfield's new range of bikes the world is your oyster. As far as the saving of the name Norton I do hope that as well as the top of the range machines they design a more affordable machine for the guy on the street, just as back in the early days the Norton International was out of most riders price range but there were plenty of more affordable models to chose from with the Norton name on the tank.
Just amazed by the looks of BSA Goldster 650 it gust looks categorically stunning......waiting for its launch in India
Thank you for showing me the first ride without the baffle in the silencer. 👍
They both sound like real motorbikes.
I thought from the first release that the Interceptor is a lovely bike but looked 'heavy'. Seeing it alongside the BSA, it looks more so. I still love it though, as you say, they just have different characteristics on a similar theme. I wish I could afford both but can't even buy one! 😕
Thanks for another great review.
Fairly done. Riders preferences on soft and wallowing or stiff and bumpy, water or aircooled, deep sound or a more edgy sound makes a difference. I expect riders will boil their choices down to the appearances. Personally I'd say a bit more money and buy the Triumph T100.
Test rode the Interceptor. Wasn't expecting massive performance obviously but it didn't have much character. Saw both side by side yesterday. Not much between them but the top of the range BSA tipped it on looks. Radiator was not an issue in the flesh If the single cylinder engine has more character then that's the one I'd go for.
Great head to head comparison. As an Interceptor owner since 2020, I am bound to be slightly biased, but when I test rode the BSA, as much as I tried not to compare the two, I found it difficult to do so. In my opinion, the Interceptor looks better in all aspects. I am not overly keen on the instrumentation on the BSA, as classically styled as it is, and the idiot lights are hard to see at a glance due to being located at the top of the headlight. I prefer the power delivery from the Interceptor, the suspension on the Interceptor is a bit harsh out of the crate compared to the BSA, but I fitted a pair of inexpensive preload spacers at the front which worked a treat, and YSS Goldtop shocks on the rear which are just fantastic once dialled in. I found the rear shocks on the BSA to be a tad soft. The Interceptor has a far sportier feel, with the BSA feeling a more laid back, almost cruiser ish. I hope to take the BSA out again in the spring, as when I rode it, the temp was -3 (I think), and the roads were wet and greasy, not ideal conditions. In my review, I do state that I wouldn’t exchange either my Interceptor or Classic 350 for a BSA, and I stand by that. Thanks for putting this comparison up, I appreciate how much time it takes to put this together. Cheers
You like the Classic 350 better too. Makes me think I maybe should get one of those.
@@stephenwandersonea1935 obviously the 350 is down on power, but it’s a lovely ride providing acceleration and 65+ mph isn’t important to you. The laid back attitude is perfect for slow A & B roads. Plus, wherever you stop, people of a certain age just come up and chat. No doubt they would with the BSA too though.
Which one is feel good, joy to ride ? Basically im not a speed freak person. I just want to enjoy the ride. So Interceptor 650 or classic350 ?
Regard.
@@pradippradhan5014 without wanting to self promote on someone else's channel, if you tap on my symbol, I do ride vids on both, and talk about them a great deal. At the end of the day, it's down to personal choice, as to whichever feels right to you. Both the 650 and 350 are great at what they do. If speed is never an issue then the 350 will be fine. If however, you want to let rip occasionally, then the 650. Hope this helps.
Excellent review! Having driven the interceptor for a few thousand kilometres on all kinds of roads and seasons (except for snow), I can definitely agree that it is an excellent motorcycle, be it for touring or on the track. Plus you can customise it into whatever you want as there are a number of bolt on cafe racer and scrambler kits available for it in the market. And, you will never have trouble getting parts or finding a skilled mechanic for it.
That said, it can be quite a hassle when you drive in a bumper to bumper traffic situation (you could perhaps make an omelette or a kebab over the engine given the heat when driving in traffic on a particularly hot day in southern India). One must also be cautious when riding them over gravel or off-road situations (but to be fair to these motorcycles, they are built for good roads, highways and tracks).
However, in my humble opinion, the BSA looks much better and more put together. I also love the clocks (I e., gauges) on it and I am completely fine with it being a big single. Can't wait to ride one and see what it feels like. Hope they bring it to our markets soon.
Thank you for the balanced view of the two bikes When it comes to parting with cash to buy one I think BSA have a long way to go to build some trust in the re established brand A mate of mine is still looking forward to getting the bike he put a deposit down a long while ago I see a lot of the RE dealers taking on BSA but with little evidence of brand support like stock I ride a Himalayan after years away Next investment will be an Interceptor Guzzi V7 or an old R Nine T
Great video again Mr Darcy
I love them both and would have both 😊😊
I’ve recently tested them both and I personally prefer the BSA but by a margin
The BSA sounds a lot better with the baffle removed and sounds like one one my old BSA singles
😊😊 love it 😊😊 to add I preferred the gearbox also on the BSA and had no issues with the suspension when I tested the BSA 😊😊
In a perfect world I'd have the Interceptor, Gold Star, and a W800 all in my garage. In the real world, I just have the Interceptor.
Thanks for the excellent, honest, head-to-head comparison. Both bikes have a lot to offer, especially at the price.
That is not an honest comparison…
@@JP-yc1wp Why do you think it’s not honest?
RE service is worst, secondly RE dial are not perfect specialy fuel indicator, heating issue, foot pegs are not perfect, missing on led lights, crome gets rusted,to me RE is a junk, oil pilage from head, valve setting regular need to monitor, and so on.
@@mariogomes923Damn
With those pipes and air box, the RE sounds brilliant, although the BSA does have a nice growl with the baffles out. Both look pretty good, but only time will tell how well the BSA stands up. Concerning the engines - that’s how the BSA engines looked form the late 40s early 50s! I think what you mean is the materials used and the finish makes the BSA engine look more modern.
The INT is on my Spring list as another stable addition...great review of two really sweet looking bikes! 👍🍻
Great video with a really honest take on both bikes. Love the stationary back drop.
I've just bought the Interceptor 650 sunset-stripe model 2024. I love the looks and simplicity of the Interceptor. Most of my previous bikes were Triumph's , the last one was a 2009 Street Triple 675R.But i am getting older and don't want to ride like an hooligang on a hooligang bike what de Streety is.The Interceptor brings me back in time with lots of fun as I had on my Meriden Daytona 500 and T140.
I live here in the States and don’t know where one would go to even look at the Goldstar. The dealer network and parts distribution for Royal Enfield is ever-growing. The three-year warranty with RE is huge - not to mention the roadside assistance they offer. At this point I look at the BSA as a vapor bike. BSA needs some financial backing if they want to put even a dent in the Royal Enfield sales numbers.
They have enough customers in south east asia already, India has extremely wealthy people to pick up where the UK gave up.
🙏 Bro knows his audience 😊
Whichever bike u choose, customer is the winner
Im glad RE and Mahindra aren't chasing the electric bandwagon...for the time being
Evening Darcy
That Re has had a heap of ££££ put on it in extras.
Crash bars,seat,exhausts just from what can be seen.
Wonder how much in total cash wise?.
Standard to standard, might have just been better.
The bsa hasn't....had anything, from what I see.
Good video though mate, hope your all good.
Cooperb great dealer....and Ian a really sound bloke.
Safe rides.....🏍🏁
We get what we get sometimes. In an ideal world BSA and Enfield would send us 2 bikes, but in reality we turn up and make the best of what we’re presented with 👍🏼
For me the Interceptor looks a bit more adult.
Yes, Im agree with you,for that reason I choose bsa.
My choice would be the Royal Enfield Interceptor in Sunset Strip color and black spoked rims. Excellent composition!
Usually i'm a RE fanboy talking visuals, but the BSA is awesome. The dead straight / triangular part of the frame beneath the little too fat seat always annoyed me on the interceptor. The BSA has some way more elegant lines and proportions overall out of the box. And the tank is simply to kneel down. Great comparison, thank you.
wow you just made me realize which part was always an eyesore on my neighbor's INT 650, that triangle always bothered me compared to the rest of the beauty, but it was kind of sub conscious but now that you have mentioned it, i know that triangle is definitely not proportionately beautiful with the rest of the bike.
@@Fusionaire If you look at the triangle and the frame underneath the seat, it looks like the math- root sign. Maybe that's what bothers me as a math genius 😂
@@CGCEifel is that not a good thing as a math genius?😃
@@Fusionaire 🤣
Great review thank you.. both great bikes. I have yet to test the BSA myself… but my thoughts, for what they’re worth, are that just visually I don’t like the RE exhaust or piggyback shocks.. both would need replacing from day one. I couldn’t live with them.. whereas the BSA visually I absolutely could live with visually straight out of the crate. From your review it seems it’s a close call and that might just swing it for me.. enjoyed the video.. keep them coming!
I agree with you, but have already tested it and get a black gold star on march 1st
I fitted a 2 into 1 exhaust saving around 12kg and a free flow air filter, these small changes have made a big difference to the performance, though it will never be a sports bike, it is though a joy to ride.
BSA. That big thumper sounded great, and it’s such a beautiful looking machine. No idea if or when they’re coming to Australia. Take my money!!!
Both bikes are nice. A test ride will help as you said, because everyone should find out if you are a single or twin engine type of person.
Cheers and good look with selecting “your” dreambike 👍🏼
Thanks buddy, I’ve actually already got my dream bike 😁
That Royal Enfield just looks & sounds gorgeous, that's the one for me!!
It’s a VERY close call! Juuuust the BSA for me, purely on the weight distribution being lower
Fair enough! I really love them both, the sound the Royal Enfield makes is winning me over!
I think you summed up the dilemma when you said that you got off *both* bikes with a smile on your face. I think it may just come down to brand loyalty. The Beezer does have a lot of catching up to do but it seems like a worthy challenger to the RE. Both are pitching at the "modern classic" market & don't forget Triumph's new 400 either. My garage could get a bit crowded...🙄
Really enjoyed this review of 2 super machines. I’ve always been a fan of the original Gold Star and for that reason, I wish I liked it the most. But, if I had to choose, I think the sound and the more ‘muscley’ look of the RE just pips it. I’d be delighted to own either or preferably, both. Thanks for the vid. Top work!
It’s great to have a choice. I don’t think I’d be sulking too much if I owned either bike.
It would have to be the interceptor for me, better looking in my opinion and a dealer right on my doorstep. The BSA looks like a good bike but it is still unproven in terms of long term reliability, parts availability etc.
On paper these two bikes are so close together. What it boils down to is what flavour retro you prefer. The 60's retro look of the BSA or the 70's retro look of the RE.
As for the sound, I prefer the urgent growl of the twin, to the raucous bellow of the single.
In the end my choice, based on sight and sound, would be the RE (I can remember the 70's).....
Good verbiage, and I agree in regards to the sound. I do think the BSA looks a bit better.
Yes definitely, the 70s look of the interceptor for me👍, sounds amazing too.
I do like the design and position of the pipe on the BSA but prefer the sound of the RE both great bikes though and if I could I would own both of therm!
These are both really nice bikes and I think it’s difficult to pick between them. I have a RE Interceptor and Continental GT and was looking at changing the interceptor in the summer, the BSA is in the frame, however the RE Super Meteor complicates the decision. I do enjoy your videos.
One of the best bike reviewing Channel ever.
Great video lads. I would go for the RE, but would be tempted to pick up a Kawasaki W800, they feel a bit lighter despite being heavier than the RE. Would love to see you guys review one of those.
We’d love to but Kawasaki won’t play ball and they’ve axed the W800 in the uk too!
BSA looks stunning as compared to Interceptor as the rear portion is more pleasing to eye, personally i like the big single's thump than the parallel twin engine sound. even though I am an enfield fan but goldstar is more desirable
Interceptor would look good next to my Meteor Fireball. Makes a great sound.
BSA sounds better on your video than any other I've watched definitely sparked my interest in getting a test ride, well done for sharing.
The engine on the BSA is water cooled and made by Rotax. Whereas the RE's engine is made by RE and is air/oil cooled. The small radiator on the RE is in fact an oil cooler. Personally I would save up and buy a Triumph T120. Nice review guys 👍
A T100 would be fine.👍
@@splodge57 Yes, perfect. 👍
I was very impressed with the recordings on the bikes - the exhaust sound coming through really clearly and fruity / throaty! Yes I prefer the sound of the twin more, and the burble on the over-run is a joy to hear! I need to get the S&S slip-ons too, and the Touring seat!
I think the steeper raked forks on the RE give it an edge in the corners, a bit more flickable and quicker to drop in to a corner. It tracks a fair bit better than my old R1200RT, but that maybe suspension failing on the old heavy girl! Oh and no centre stand on the BSA, makes chain work, tyre air topping, and cleaning a lot harder without.
Great review - I like the more compact nature of the RE 650 twin engine, and lots of polished aluminium - it does take a fair bit of work to keep shiny! Both pretty frugal on fuel, and both old school styling of the 60's. Graeme NZ
Both bikes look and sound great 👍🏼
Great review 👏
I would love an interceptor, it sounds great , but I wouldn't complain if both bikes were in my garage, shame there's no room 😁
I wish I could evict the car from the garage. Its tight in there between the bike and the car. I'm thinking of building a ramp to park the bike on.
That was a really good comparison, one of the most comprehensive I've seen. I love both of 'em; nothing for it but one for each boot methinks. Subscribed.
Thanks very much! Welcome aboard 👍🏼👍🏼
I prefer the Royal Enfield. It has a more muscular look to me and sounds great. Both are beautiful, though.
Congratulations on hitting 70 thousand subscribers
Great review, well presented thank you 👍. For me the RE gets the nod. 😊👍.
I really love what classic legends did with the fuel tank cap
Cracking video
Definitely agree with you on which bike sounded the best, maybe not as easy to tell while riding.
The chrome tank on the BSA takes the win for me. It looks more classic and the single cylinder makes it more unique.
Royal Enfield has a chrome tank version available.
I prefer the build quality and reliability of Japanese bikes. These Indian bikes are a little too crude and cheaply made for my liking. I particularly dislike buying a famous old name and slapping it on a lookalike. Hey presto the BSA Goldstar is back !
However we all look for different in our bikes and more choice is good for us all. Thanks for the vid, you still got the thumbs up 😁
Thanks buddy, exactly there’s a bike for everyone and I appreciate people like yourself who understand why people like different types of bikes!
I love this channel. And I love you decidedly came down on being undecided. I love my RE Interceptor, so easy to do, and now I’m thinking, I’d love a single BSA for the reasons you mentioned. I’m just not sure how to slip it by the Mrs. 😉
I do love the BSA’s Ive had two 125 batam, and 650 lighting but watching You Tube on the BSA’s and the royal Enfield I think the Royal Enfield is the better bargain in terms of looks, style, smoothness of acceleration, much nicer fittings as speed dials and controls, the exhaust sound was smooth, I would buy the Enfield and Im seriously thinking about it. Dave Hampshire
The interceptor has been around for a while . I would go for that .
Amazing video with deep information on both Indian machine, designed in UK🎉
That Namaskar 🙏is Ultimate Love from India ❤
👍👍👍both look and sound great
Always liked the sound of a single thumper
Really nice Video with a lot of great different camera Angles and a lot of information.
Both of them a pretty nice Bikes but too small for me with my 6'5"
Nicely produced video once again Darcy . For me it's the interceptor, I'm 65, so it fits the 60s/70s look (my nostalgia era) .. Bsa more 50s/60s... thats apart from the RE being a known quantity, and of course a very nice bike, whether you like retro or not .
The Enfield was on my short-list when I bought a Guzzi 850 V7 a couple of years back and I think I'd still take it over the BSA. Twin cylinders, better looks and finish (are those stacked-rifle stickers on the pseudo-pushrod cover on the right of the engine?), more secure handling and established dealer backup would make the difference.
I prefer the clocks on the RE. I prefer the tank on the BSA. I prefer the engine sound on the RE (and it probably makes a better spread being a twin). It also sounds like the suspension is better.
I really can't wait for the Meteor 650. I've been banging on about it since the 350 came out but the 650 engine in a Meteor would be just right for me.
Both bikes look kickass, and I think it's just a matter of preference. Both bikes have been brought up to modern specs. They both use modern tech. They both have classic looks. In the end it's ,what color,what style do you want?
Especially the engine portion in BSA looks unique design!
Beautyful bikes😎 Love the sound and the estetic 👍👍👍👏
I must say I much prefer the way the bsa sounds, with that baritone growl it has, I think it sounds great.
You missed a really important point Darcy. The RE is air cooled, what you pointed out as a radiator is actually an oil cooler.
A big single can never be air cooled in a new bike. Big singles have really struggled with euro standards. The re is oil cooled really. It's another area where a twin has an advantage over a single.
Interesting review. Both great bikes but it would be the Interceptor for me, especially with that exhaust note.