Pulsar Thermion 2 XG50 LRF 3X magnification or XP50 PRO 2X FOV

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @chriscato1531
    @chriscato1531 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You sir do the best comparison on you tube.

  • @tylerrussell6276
    @tylerrussell6276 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Best comparison videos out there. Excellent explanation and breakdown of units.

  • @K3ELG-Eric
    @K3ELG-Eric ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just got an XG and compared to a buddies Thermion2 XP 50 LRF, I believe through the eye piece it’s even more noticeable that the XG is better for the way we hunt
    Travis’s knowledge and customer service is second to NONE and will be who I recommend to all my hunting buddies
    Eric

  • @20ppc
    @20ppc ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi Travis, another great video, really helpful. I have just bought the XG50 LRF and it’s a great scope for shooting foxes at over 150 yards.
    Regards
    Nick

  • @Liam-ql7tr
    @Liam-ql7tr ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!!!! No one will do this comparison.
    Thanks again

  • @bullrun1
    @bullrun1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Travis -- if I can only build one dedicated thermal AR setup -- for coyote, fox, etc. - would you recommend a 16", 18" or 20" barrel gun ? (I am going with the new Thermion 2 XG50 LFR) -- Thank You.....enjoyed the video

  • @mr.rem2609
    @mr.rem2609 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very, very informative video. I had the old xg50. I have now a thermion2 xp50 pro. I think i want the LRF. Very close decision on these for sure. This is a tough one. I have spoke to Travis on the phone, he is very easy to talk to.

  • @derekedgley5074
    @derekedgley5074 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was at a recent importer demonstration of the full Pulsar range. The weather was distinctly foul with windy rainy misty conditions prevailing. As I’d watched this video I went with the intention of buying the XG50 LRF but looking through the various devices including the XL my immediate impression was that the XP in those particular conditions, often sustained in Scotland ,was better for clarity at the range to a wood some 155yds distant. Unfortunately now that I’ve got it mounted and trying to use in the field I’m beginning to think that it’s not really suitable for the longer ranges I’ve to shoot at, as the definition I’d believed was available, just isn’t, hence I’m wondering if the demo models are tweaked by Pulsar for marketing purposes, but the normal purchase boxed and sealed which I bought that night are to a lesser specification easier to manufacture on a production basis?
    There just isn’t the clarity for my nearly 80 year old eyes despite being blessed with good vision compared with my latest HIK Thunder 2 clip on and especially my Infiray MAH50 MATE which I rate against even my Tube Infiray TH50 V2 and then there’s the huge price difference charged by Pulsar
    I’ve still got an XM50 bought on the recommendation of Trevor many moons ago viewing a similar type video comparison. With its high base Mag it’s pretty good. I’m surprised the XG isn’t offered with

  • @Liam-ql7tr
    @Liam-ql7tr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you let your xg models sensors warm few minutes up before officially using?

  • @scottshreve3298
    @scottshreve3298 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for posting ! Really like to see the Thermion 2 XG50 vs the Krypton XG50 :) Thank you

  • @Александр-ш5у7о
    @Александр-ш5у7о ปีที่แล้ว

    Красавчик👍🏻. Все разложил по полочкам.

  • @hossienpakseresht3360
    @hossienpakseresht3360 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent. Why don't these great scopes have ballistic calculation like ATN Thor 4

    • @foxoptic5887
      @foxoptic5887  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's supposed to be coming out later this month.

    • @hossienpakseresht3360
      @hossienpakseresht3360 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@foxoptic5887 I hope you make a complete video on how to use it.

  • @Terrybrowninsurance
    @Terrybrowninsurance 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks to me like the XP is better up to 125 yards or so, but at further distances the XG is better. Am I seeing this correctly?

    • @foxoptic5887
      @foxoptic5887  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Terrybrowninsurance personally I prefer the XP50 if most of my shots were between 0-250, if I was averaging 75-400, I am a bigger fan of the XG50 and if I couldn't make up my mind and could afford it XL50LRF. I really think it's more about the lower end as I wouldn't want to cut FOV to gain ID if I was more likely to use one a lot more than the other. (With the larger sensor the XL offers both)

  • @scottkane9071
    @scottkane9071 ปีที่แล้ว

    GREAT video - thank you.

  • @GW2964
    @GW2964 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you using different color profiles?

  • @sakofinland3421
    @sakofinland3421 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It cracks me up that every time someone does a thermal comparison video, it's always "not ideal thermal conditions"
    🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @jrnyan3054
    @jrnyan3054 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is it when it comes to even smaller game...like rabbit/hare...?

    • @K3ELG-Eric
      @K3ELG-Eric ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i had no problem last night picking a rabbit out last night he was 225 yds

  • @DeltaBravoOpr8r
    @DeltaBravoOpr8r ปีที่แล้ว

    If you have an older XP50… save your money.

  • @simonwildboar1410
    @simonwildboar1410 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is that a Skunk !!