How Hitler Destroyed Europe So Easily

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ย. 2022
  • Get my new book Bread and Circuses: bit.ly/breadandcircusesbook
    Thoughty2 Audiobook: geni.us/t2audio
    Thoughty2 Book: geni.us/t2book
    Support Me & Get Early Access: bit.ly/t2club
    Thoughty2 Merchandise: bit.ly/t2merch
    Follow Thoughty2
    Facebook: / thoughty2
    Instagram: / thoughty2
    Website: thoughty2.com
    About Thoughty2
    Thoughty2 (Arran) is a British TH-camr and gatekeeper of useless facts. Thoughty2 creates mind-blowing factual videos about science, tech, history, opinion and just about everything else.
    #Thoughty2
    Writing: Steven Rix
    Editing: Jack Stevens

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @dowpman1
    @dowpman1 ปีที่แล้ว +9139

    i think we can all agree that, especially for an educational video, the censoring just needs to stop. Period...

    • @libertycowboy2495
      @libertycowboy2495 ปีที่แล้ว +203

      AMEN!

    • @glidershower
      @glidershower ปีที่แล้ว +599

      It ain't gonna stop for anything that threathens the greasing of the wheels of global commerce.
      _Can't have humanity freely thinking for itself as a collective consciousness via the Internet, can we now?_

    • @markzuckergecko621
      @markzuckergecko621 ปีที่แล้ว

      Conservatives have been trying to tell everyone for years, censorship never remains as only censoring ideas you don't like.

    • @nickevershedmusic8927
      @nickevershedmusic8927 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      You mean the swearing censoring?

    • @dowpman1
      @dowpman1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nickevershedmusic8927 all of it. Including blurring out part of the swastika. We all know what it looks like… if it really triggers you that much don’t watch the video

  • @adrianfrr310
    @adrianfrr310 ปีที่แล้ว +4488

    Worth noting that Ukraine is fighting a defensive battle with a great amount of financial and indirect military support from much of the developed world, which is vastly different than the defensive capabilities of Poland and the surrounding nations at the start of WWII

    • @robertmills3830
      @robertmills3830 ปีที่แล้ว

      Russia is still incredibly bad at war. The generals are corrupt and there is no sense of nationalism there! Everyone is looking out for themselves.

    • @JaceKeller
      @JaceKeller ปีที่แล้ว +567

      It’s direct* military support. They share intelligence, ressources and are being given the best material on earth.

    • @scottfoster3445
      @scottfoster3445 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Indeed

    • @its_dey_mate
      @its_dey_mate ปีที่แล้ว +275

      Also important to mention that Ukraine and Russia have been at war since 2014, just not to this extent of destruction. So the Ukrainians were mentally prepared for the possibility of a war and also considering how absolutely ginormous the country is, with how many people its no wonder that the poorly coordinated Russians have barely made a dent. Guerilla tactics are very useful especially so when every squadron of bloody 4 people has an anti tank US, German, UK, Polish or wherever else's armament

    • @bezpansky
      @bezpansky ปีที่แล้ว +130

      Also, let's not forget, that Poland was attacked by Soviet Union on 17th of September, so there was literally no way in or out of Poland, beside small border with Romania, so the opportunity for support was very limited. And the support from the allies also lacked. West of Germany wasn't manned that well and Britain and France could've opened the second front right away and probably gain advantage.
      Also one thing that wasn't mentioned in the video - French plan for defence was to just fortify the living hell out of their birder with Germany. It was unbreakable. So Germans did what they did in the first war and attacked through Belgium, routing almost all of French army, that was concentrated on the border and quickly running for Paris.
      So the additional reason why Nazi Germany was able to make such fast progress, was lousy response from the west allies. I mean, the war was inevitable, when Germany annexed parts of Czechoslovakia in 1938 and then just invaded it.

  • @civetmink9060
    @civetmink9060 ปีที่แล้ว +335

    Imagine being a store clerk and having to count out 4.2 trillion marks and having to figure out the change

    • @zacharyjackson7584
      @zacharyjackson7584 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Your change good sir! 17 billion, 427 million, 387 thousand, and 24 marks.

    • @Sava.S
      @Sava.S ปีที่แล้ว

      Catastrophe, should have used bitcoin, idiots

    • @tomasjenco5609
      @tomasjenco5609 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And when you're mid counting they hit you with the "actually I got a million coin right here!"

    • @notalokivariant
      @notalokivariant ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@zacharyjackson7584 It's fine keep the change

    • @khaledhm9284
      @khaledhm9284 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They weighed them and did not count them

  • @chillzwinter
    @chillzwinter ปีที่แล้ว +1375

    You forgot to mention how in 1938 Adolf Hitler was awarded “Man of the Year” by Time Magazine for being a generally nice guy.

    • @DETSRC313
      @DETSRC313 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      He went to war on that clout from the cover of Time 😂

    • @julio85019
      @julio85019 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      @@aSSGoblin1488L

    • @TheGrowlingAraknid
      @TheGrowlingAraknid ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@julio85019 what do you have against Indians, Native Americans, and the Germanic people?

    • @beezergutler5488
      @beezergutler5488 ปีที่แล้ว

      No he won it for being an asshole. Lots of people have won Time man of the year for being assholes.

    • @DysNuts
      @DysNuts ปีที่แล้ว +17

      It was a condemnation. Some titles aren’t so dubiously conspicuous as your nomination for comedian of the week.

  • @felixzeh5066
    @felixzeh5066 ปีที่แล้ว +1024

    Just a quick remark: In your animation at 7:15 you show Austria and Germany as one, while talking about the power seizing of Hitler in 1933. However, Austria did not become a part of Germany until 1938.

    • @niklas848x
      @niklas848x ปีที่แล้ว +177

      Also East Prussia is missing on every map

    • @TheTruthIsNowHateSpeech
      @TheTruthIsNowHateSpeech ปีที่แล้ว

      There is alot of disinformation in this video, if you guys want to know the truth about ww2, check out "Europa The Last Battle" on odysee.com or goyimtv .tv

    • @Thawhid
      @Thawhid ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Oh

    • @nahx6205
      @nahx6205 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      And Germany didn't come into control of the Sudetenland until late 1938

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Irrelevant when it comes to reasons why Germany overwhelmed other countries so quickly.

  • @atzuras
    @atzuras ปีที่แล้ว +768

    Fun fact: dive bombers did not target the strongest defensive points, they attacked the weakest.
    Although common depicted by media as softening the enemy forces, they usually targeted fixed positions and did very little when the combat was raging on.
    It s changed during 1943 and 44, when the luftwaffe was almost depleted.

    • @BasementEngineer
      @BasementEngineer ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Hmmm, there is a book describing how a single German Stuka dive bomber pilot destroyed 500 USSR tanks. Were they all weak and standing still?

    • @jankjaws9815
      @jankjaws9815 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@BasementEngineer tanks of the time were slow and had no anti air craft gun. Armor was generally weak too. Plus you have a Stuka that’s moving at 200mph. Besides large bombers were primarily used to take out more fortified targets considering they would just fly high let it rain hell fire.

    • @walterfechter8080
      @walterfechter8080 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's common knowledge that long-range fighters, with drop tanks, escorting heavy bombers helped out. Aircraft such as the P51 Mustang, the P38 Lightning and the P47 Thunderbolt certainly helped to change the course of the war, both, in the air and on the ground. Of course, the deciding factor was that Germany was running low on aviation fuel, aircraft and capable pilots.

    • @tk9780
      @tk9780 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Luftwaffe was almost depleted 43-45, which is just wrong. even with the Luftwaffe'sever growing lack of quality pilots and a desperate shortage of fuel the Allied still weren't able to obtain Air superiority over the whole of Europe until January 1945. Saying that Luftwaffe was a depleted force 43-45 is a dishonor to the 10s of thousands of Allied Aircrew who were killed over Europe between 1943-45. Also, there is no fun fact about WW2 when 40-50 Million people died.

    • @softibjorn
      @softibjorn ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BasementEngineer And who made that book, may i ask?

  • @neilbowman573
    @neilbowman573 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    The Germans, both world wars, were able to mobilize troops in a way nobody would've predicted. They're a very efficient group of people.

    • @supermaximglitchy1
      @supermaximglitchy1 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Appearantly German word for German translates to an old germanic word for ‘people’
      Old Germans saw themselves as simply people, one folk.

    • @neilbowman573
      @neilbowman573 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@supermaximglitchy1 Volk

    • @Gleichtritt
      @Gleichtritt หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@supermaximglitchy1 That's bs. Our Word for German is "Deutsch" which most likely comes from the Germanic tribe of the "Teutonen" but over the centuries words changed and the "Teut.." became "Deutsch".

    • @supermaximglitchy1
      @supermaximglitchy1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Gleichtritt I was trying to refer to a more southern variant of the old German word that’s not called Deutsch but literally a German word that contains the word german

    • @MEGA1FILM
      @MEGA1FILM 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not anymore...

  • @rampart6925
    @rampart6925 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    "This rapid shitstorm on the ground..." I still laugh everytime. 😂

    • @geoffreyturner8473
      @geoffreyturner8473 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The crazy thing is, I was reading this comment literally while he was saying it.😂😂😂

    • @rampart6925
      @rampart6925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@geoffreyturner8473 LOL!! 🤣🤣

    • @geoffreyturner8473
      @geoffreyturner8473 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@rampart6925 😂😂😂

  • @otto1449
    @otto1449 ปีที่แล้ว +734

    When you describe Germany in 1930, the map shows that Austria was supposedly already part of Germany, although they were only incorporated into the Reich eight years later via the Anschluss. The Sudetenland also seems to have been wrongly incorporated into your version of the ("Weimar-") German-Republic. In contrast, East Prussia is not shown in dark red on your graphic for whatever reason, although this was part of the Weilmar Republic in contrast to the other areas mentioned.
    The information you give is generally correct and the graphic optics are very pretty, but the geographical borders and classification in the timeline are far from reality.

    • @TeK9KBC
      @TeK9KBC ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yeah I noticed that too!
      I had to double check old maps and sure enough there are mistakes on the drawing of the borders.

    • @chrisg3030
      @chrisg3030 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Your point reminds me of something which puzzles me a bit. Reparations were demanded from Germany but what about Austria-Hungary, as far as I know their allies and who declared war before Germany did? Was it because the Austria-Hungary empire was dismembered by then?

    • @danielgomessilva8966
      @danielgomessilva8966 ปีที่แล้ว

      thought the same

    • @chrisg3030
      @chrisg3030 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@danielgomessilva8966 I went to Wikipedia. "Following the ratification of article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles at the conclusion of World War I, the Central Powers were compelled to give war reparations to the Allied Powers. Each of the defeated powers was required to make payments in either cash or kind. Because of the financial situation in Austria, Hungary, and Turkey after the war, few to no reparations were paid and the requirements for reparations were cancelled."
      This still leaves open the question as to why reparations continued to be required from Germany given their "financial situation" seems to have been pretty bad too. Any ideas? "

    • @danielgomessilva8966
      @danielgomessilva8966 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@chrisg3030 can you explain why in the video, Austria is depicted as Germany and East Prussia not?
      Because the subject of the comment is this point, not at all why one has to pay and other don't.
      But i can give you an idea: Germany at it's birth was perceived as a nation with steroids. The other countries were not a treat

  • @BuzzBuzzVr130
    @BuzzBuzzVr130 ปีที่แล้ว +2109

    This dude taught me more history than the entire time I have been in school

    • @rmehu
      @rmehu ปีที่แล้ว +18

      my school don’t teach hostory

    • @stanbeyani5089
      @stanbeyani5089 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like you were a lazy student..

    • @marblox9300
      @marblox9300 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      That is how useless grades 1-12 are. Over priced baby sitters.

    • @thebreadic5488
      @thebreadic5488 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      There are a Lot of inacurassies in this vid, so you might wanna Take everything in His vids with a grain of salt

    • @thebreadic5488
      @thebreadic5488 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@marblox9300 it's really Not, although you learn a Lot of Things that you'll forget, it teaches you how to Solve/Analyse different Things!

  • @OlavSchneider
    @OlavSchneider ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "How Hitler Destroyed Europe So Easily" And now it's the green pary doing it in record time.

  • @ClarenceCreekwater
    @ClarenceCreekwater ปีที่แล้ว +40

    T2, You said ( approx 17:00) " ... if I had sum it all up in a video so long, you wouldn't watch ..." reveals exactly why Hitler was able to do what he did. We humans seem to have incredibly short attention spans.

    • @kensurrency2564
      @kensurrency2564 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      To a certain extent, Europe didn’t want another war after 1918. Too much reliance on the League of Nations and a general pacifism gave Hitler a lot of room to operate. There are myriad factors that led toward the war, and he was smart enough to take advantage of every one.

    • @qy-exotic7717
      @qy-exotic7717 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ahahhaha

    • @nothink8479
      @nothink8479 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you saying this like yo ahh is an alien

  • @SupremeLeaderKimJong-un
    @SupremeLeaderKimJong-un ปีที่แล้ว +604

    That first map was a bit painful. Not because of the army's destruction, but how inaccurate it is:
    1. East Prussia isn't colored in, and because of that, the Polish Corridor is also missing at 1:14.
    2. Germany didn't invade Yugoslavia and Greece until 1941. And when they helped Italy with Greece, Italy took most of it and it wasn't until 1943 when they took the Italian occupation zone.
    3. Germany only occupied northern and the western coast of France until 1944, the rest of it until then was the collaborationist Vichy France
    4. Germany occupied Denmark in 1940
    5. The Nazis didn't occupy Finland. You might be confusing it with the German Empire who tried to create a pro-German Finnish monarchy but that attempt failed. Though the Germans helped Finns against the Soviets in the Continuation War, the Soviets won and ordered the Finns to kick the Germans off their soil to then German-occupied Norway.
    6. Slovak Republic was a client state rather than German-occupied
    7. Germans didn't invade Italy until 1943, and it was the only the northern half
    8. Kingdom of Hungary was an ally
    9. Tsardom of Bulgaria was also an ally
    On top of that, Austria and the Sudetenland didn't become a part of Germany until 1938. And the Autobahn existed before Hitler, he just expanded it.

    • @steves1015
      @steves1015 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Doesn't surprise me. He has done other videos where he was wrong about significant details.

    • @jynvomnorden82
      @jynvomnorden82 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I guess the intention of the 1:20 map was to show the max extent of Axis-dominated territory in the War. But yeah, we can agree that the mapping is poorly represented. For instance, the map of Germany shown is the territory change after the annexation of Austria in 1938.

    • @johnromans2509
      @johnromans2509 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Yeah, very poorly informed "educational" video. At least the guy got millions of views and TH-cam ad revenue I guess...

    • @00FireFlyer00
      @00FireFlyer00 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      thats how kids want their info nowadays. a 10-20min poor summary with some flashy pictures emotes etc. and some marvel reference so in other words more like a short movie for the feeling rather than education

    • @sarahshaw7315
      @sarahshaw7315 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it was just an axis map rather then direct German control perhaps? The other mistakes are annoying but… what can ya do?

  • @eddie4854
    @eddie4854 ปีที่แล้ว +390

    love when actual footage is used, The immersion is really there.

    • @Fraek
      @Fraek ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@odenoki9571 ur right

  • @VitaInDC
    @VitaInDC ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Oh, one more thing to add. I asked my father in the early '70s about WW2 since he had been a soldier (but it ended before he was deployed anywhere). He had the oddest answer. He said, "Because they didn't fight WW1 the right way and had to fight it all over again". I was only a 10th grader and had no idea what questions to ask next, like what do you mean. Wish he was alive to ask now, but he'd be over 100.

    • @B8sean
      @B8sean 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Seems to me like a lighthearted joke

    • @kevineiford2153
      @kevineiford2153 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'd guess that he meant that the allies accepted a conditional surrender from Germany, which later allowed them to rearm and start WW2. In WW1 the war never got to Germany soil, in WW2 the allies didn't stop until they reached Berlin

  • @shorty400400400
    @shorty400400400 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The winners write history.

  • @tomm1413
    @tomm1413 ปีที่แล้ว +481

    Awesome video as always! Here's a story you might find interesting. A British ace in WW2 flew without legs! Yes you read that right. He lost his legs in a plane crash before the war, but still wanted to fly with the RAF and he was amazing. He shot down many German planes until he was shot down himself above Europe and captured by the Germans. He then tried to escape the hospital and the pow camp he was in multiple times until he finally got rescued from his prison. After the war, he made great efforts for people with disabilities and was even knighted for hos work for people with disabilities. This amazing story is the true story of Douglas Bader. And I think Arran would be able to make an amazing video about him!

    • @tomz5704
      @tomz5704 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I'm not surprised he got caught having no legs and all but how in the hell did he escape?

    • @tomz5704
      @tomz5704 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Divinity_vA I wonder at what point in the war he got rescued and how

    • @wwiiinplastic4712
      @wwiiinplastic4712 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There are already a number of videos on Bader on the military channels, so I don't know if he'd want to have to compete with that rather than cover a new topic .

    • @asambrook76
      @asambrook76 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Here's the movie version from 1956 - th-cam.com/video/OSmsUAqbFnQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @shereesmazik5030
      @shereesmazik5030 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes , please cover this hero .

  • @fingusa
    @fingusa ปีที่แล้ว +417

    11:00 Fun fact, Czechoslovakia was essentially invaded by the Nazies before Poland after the Munich Betrayal where our "Sudety" border area was essentially sold to them by the Allies without our consent. Later on the rest of the country was invaded completely, with Slovakian part of the country becoming a Nazi sat state cause their government was fairly ultra-right leaning.

    • @bavarian_ttv2010
      @bavarian_ttv2010 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      how are you calling this a fun fact man

    • @cyphercracker
      @cyphercracker ปีที่แล้ว +8

      So nothing has changed really.

    • @sam08g16
      @sam08g16 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Borovicka

    • @jamesmoriarty3877
      @jamesmoriarty3877 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      You misspelled left. They were socialists who believed in eugenics. The only thing that even remotely ties them to the "right" is nationalism, which also happens to exist in Communism.
      They were just slightly right of Communists. That's it. Know your history.

    • @glennllewellyn7369
      @glennllewellyn7369 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good!

  • @3mo_kween
    @3mo_kween ปีที่แล้ว +138

    Thank you for the tutorial ❤️

    • @peoplecallmetweety
      @peoplecallmetweety ปีที่แล้ว

      Imagine thinking millions of years of evolution and random chance you're born in a random place makes you superior because... the melanin in you produces less pigment. How embarrassing.

    • @3mo_kween
      @3mo_kween ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@peoplecallmetweety im being sarcastic💀

    • @jackbuff_I
      @jackbuff_I ปีที่แล้ว +6

      If you use this as a tutorial of actual facts, you're in trouble.

    • @omiau4434
      @omiau4434 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wait...

    • @JmKrokY
      @JmKrokY ปีที่แล้ว +3

      💀

  • @paulhickman5210
    @paulhickman5210 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When I'm not particularly interested in the subject of your videos. I still find myself fully engaged from the start to finish. Keep up the great content 😊

  • @godlakwarrior3886
    @godlakwarrior3886 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    Get your first hour VIP tickets here

  • @Scroffy
    @Scroffy ปีที่แล้ว +155

    i love how he does so much research about stuff im intrested in and makes a 20 minute video that has all the info i want and is entertaining too

    • @justincraig398
      @justincraig398 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      He’s watching you , and tracking your online search history. Change your passwords dude.

    • @tmr4342
      @tmr4342 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@justincraig398 😂

    • @sanjablazina2879
      @sanjablazina2879 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@justincraig398 ... or get Dash for all your passwords😃
      😂😂

    • @Scroffy
      @Scroffy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justincraig398 haha

    • @thebreadic5488
      @thebreadic5488 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He got a Lot of stuff wrong though

  • @ristonthepro8750
    @ristonthepro8750 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this video was really well made, the animations and graphics just made it better, props to you mate

  • @nathanbirchall933
    @nathanbirchall933 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Always followed your channel over the years. You are great at what you do 😇

  • @titter3648
    @titter3648 ปีที่แล้ว +238

    Blitzkrig was about committing the max amount of your forces to every battle, and not holding back to keep some in case you lost the battle. And this strategy in most cases statistically make sure you loose the least amount of personell and equipment compared to if you where holding back and committing a smaller force. And that is probably also why Russia is loosing so much now, because they where holding back and initially just committing a small force to a "special operation" in stead of just mobilize right away and send all of their force for a blitzkrig style attack.

    • @AndrewVasirov
      @AndrewVasirov ปีที่แล้ว +23

      True, they cannot manage every frontline with ~200k soldiers and that's why they retreated from Kharkov region (and are still being pushed back lmao) and why Russia did those referendums and started mobilizing. They thought Ukraine would just sign peace once they reached Kiev and they'd get along in the end. What a foolish mistake. Imagine talking how the Ukrainian government is employing Nazis while at the same time you still wanna make deals with them. Or how they treated real Nazis as casual POWs and even exchanged some of them, now those Nazis exaggerate their experience in the prison or start posting war crimes again.
      If the Russian government really wants to treat enemy POWs who support far right ideologies better than it treats its soldiers, it shall not dare to expect a win unless it becomes more ruthless.
      TL;DR Russia was foolish and lame and it takes too long to adapt its strategy accordingly.

    • @dragatus
      @dragatus ปีที่แล้ว +40

      The problem with blitzkrieg as a strategy is that you are essentially betting on everything going mostly according to plan, because you have no reserves to deal with the unexpected. So statistically it will work great most of the time, but when it fails it'll fail spectacularly. Germany actually got invaded by France during the attack on Poland in 1939 and was saved only by the French command losing their nerve and deciding to retreat without a fight.

    • @christiantaylor1495
      @christiantaylor1495 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AndrewVasirov More like Russia over estimated Europe's intelligence. We are being morons by helping Ukraine and refusing to buy Russian gas and oil. Russia did nothing wrong to us, and we treat them like rubbish just for justly responding to Ukrainian anti-Russian Nazification and peace treaty-violating militarization (Minsk Agreement).
      In this video, Aaron mocks how Europe believed Hitler built German military just "for defence" yet you sucker s believe Ukraine did just the same thing

    • @roblouw3038
      @roblouw3038 ปีที่แล้ว

      shame Titter - you actually believe that there is a war going on between Russia and UKraine - you are easily deceived and lack critical thinking and critical thinking processes - obviously you haven't heard of Nesara and Gesara - let me ask you this - do you think viruses exist? Do you think the earth is round and spinning through so called space at unbelievable speeds? I guess you probably do which is EXACTLY why you think Russia invaded UKraine....sleep well Titter but not for too long it could be 'deadly"....

    • @user-im7km8tq7j
      @user-im7km8tq7j ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Don't forget that unlike European countries at the start of WW2 that were not prepared for invasion, Ukraine was. That war has started not on 24.02.2022, it started in February of 2014 right after Maidan revolution success. And after that it was certain that we had to prepare for war and we did. And russians just did not expect us to be so well prepared.

  • @WildcardASMR
    @WildcardASMR ปีที่แล้ว +445

    Thoughty2 is so entertaining, I oftentimes literally sit here and watch through videos which discuss things I already know to death.

    • @theguyof360
      @theguyof360 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      well, he is wrong on many things

    • @anthonykaplan4229
      @anthonykaplan4229 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@theguyof360 I'm not saying you're wrong but kinda crazy to say such things without any kind of example.

    • @theguyof360
      @theguyof360 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anthonykaplan4229 you're*

    • @anthonykaplan4229
      @anthonykaplan4229 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@theguyof360 fixed , seems instead of correcting Petty grammar mistakes, you could have actually left any kind of an example.

    • @theguyof360
      @theguyof360 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@anthonykaplan4229 LOL

  • @grrinc
    @grrinc ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Britain should never have started ww2.

  • @VitaInDC
    @VitaInDC ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow! I really like how you put this together! The story, the film clips and photos, the editing, the subtle background music, you really made the history interesting and I learned a few things. Thank you.

  • @hungrymusicwolf
    @hungrymusicwolf ปีที่แล้ว +5

    14:24 I like this little detail of the radio shouting "LIES" over and over again.

  • @alancranford3398
    @alancranford3398 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    During Germany's depression there were stories of people burning money instead of expensive coal and when people were robbed, the money was dumped on the ground and baskets and wheelbarrows were stolen instead.

    • @TheVanderfulLife
      @TheVanderfulLife ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gonna be the UK soon with the £ crashing against the $ and energy prices going up. Burning my plastic notes to keep warm be cheaper

  • @UndyingZombie
    @UndyingZombie ปีที่แล้ว +72

    I have probably one of the most unique family tree to exist.. As my family has people on both sides of WW1 and WW2... Japanese, German, American, and Britain ( Irish specifically )
    .. That and my family basically hit other members of their family with nuclear bombs.. Once again.. Very unique and strange family tree. ( Yes, some of my family tree was wiped out by other members of the family tree who dropped the two nuclear bombs on Japan.. Thankfully for me not all of my section of the family tree was in those areas of Japan lol. )
    I knew about almost all you mentioned here with the exception of the USA giving money to try and help Germany pre-ww2. Its interesting to think that, the USA very much both directly and indirectly influenced things both for the German side, and the Japanese side of WW2... Without really realizing how much they really would end up influencing it.

    • @UndyingZombie
      @UndyingZombie ปีที่แล้ว

      @Yummy Spaghetti Noodles and I would have no problems defending myself against a moron who does not realize that nazis are long dead. Hell Even the neo nazi group is practically all dead now too.
      More so since most of said morons today are 90 pound weaklings with dyed hair.

    • @themostdiabolicalhater5986
      @themostdiabolicalhater5986 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cool life story, I didn’t ask though. Nobody did

    • @UndyingZombie
      @UndyingZombie ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@themostdiabolicalhater5986 I always find comments like yours to be funny. Pretend they do not care yet they where the one that decided to spend the time to make said "No one cares" comment.

    • @themostdiabolicalhater5986
      @themostdiabolicalhater5986 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@UndyingZombie you get comments like mine a lot huh? I say those things because I don’t appreciate having my time wasted with your uninteresting life story that probably didn’t even happen. We tell you we don’t care so you don’t waste other people’s time with your nonsense. Be more considerate

    • @UndyingZombie
      @UndyingZombie ปีที่แล้ว

      @@themostdiabolicalhater5986 Its rare that I see comments like yours. Though those who do make them all seem just as unintelligent. Please keep on going and keep proving my statements.

  • @michaelcasalta7679
    @michaelcasalta7679 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative!!! Well Done!!!

  • @USSOBRIEN
    @USSOBRIEN ปีที่แล้ว +33

    The funny thing is, is that we are all on the edge of a cataclysmic earth-changing war. Countries around the world contain mindboggling dangerous weapons of mass destruction already. Which is why we should avoid wars at all cost. People talk about wanting to go to war, but as a veteran, TRUST ME, war is not something one wishes for. Enjoy life & make everyday count. 👍

    • @popaandrei4521
      @popaandrei4521 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not sure who would want to go to war. Not sure why people my age are such warmongers

    • @that_garden_gnome
      @that_garden_gnome ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wait...who's talking about wanting to go to war?

    • @jlara7238
      @jlara7238 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@that_garden_gnomeWAR WAR WAR

    • @odysseusrex5908
      @odysseusrex5908 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, we should not avoid wars at all cost. That would mean instant surrender at the first sign of aggression. Life is not so dear, peace is not so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. There are things of great value which must be defended when threatened, or they will surely be lost.

    • @USSOBRIEN
      @USSOBRIEN ปีที่แล้ว

      @@odysseusrex5908 Understand before you condemn. Instant surrender is not the same as avoiding a war. Quite apparently if you have to then you have to, but let that be the last resort. That's all I'm saying. But when someone says last resort, then that means there will be no recourse but war. A head of state should not just float that idea so loosely. You got to think before you act.

  • @finchontwitch7587
    @finchontwitch7587 ปีที่แล้ว +447

    the fact this guy isn't on 10 mill subs is crazy to me, no matter the video i watch they are always the most intellectual yet funny and enjoyable things to watch

    • @hitechinc.7875
      @hitechinc.7875 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Slowly bro

    • @harnageaa
      @harnageaa ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Well it's pretty simple, I am a long time subscriber and what I noticed is that his videos are hit and miss, he sometimes make a video that it would make you say: wow this dude deserve 20 mil, or 10 mil. And other times you wonder, did I subscribed to some 100k random channel that post facts from random newsletters?
      I don't say negative things because I realize that "interesting topics" are not infinite for the finite knowledge of audience, you can talk about math or whatever and interesting stuff but if the audience can't really understand it then it won't make views. So what I noticed is that he need money to pay his team for helping with animation and research. And From time to time a banger video comes out. if he somewhat managed to only keep posting 'banger' videos, his views would've remain in the 'millions' per video which youtube would've promoted him more and get 10 mil quicker, but bcs he sometimes post irrelevant topics that are mostly clickbaity, it get 'less views'. That makes his average performance poor and youtube recommends less.

    • @zairmorningstarmusic
      @zairmorningstarmusic ปีที่แล้ว +4

      4 million is a lot for this kinda content he’s doing perfect rn

    • @mikeog2617
      @mikeog2617 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well a lot of bs channels with irrelevant content are making millions of subs like no tomorrow as long they entertain lol

    • @sullya6967
      @sullya6967 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well he's close to 5 million, so halfway there

  • @trishcouncell2342
    @trishcouncell2342 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was very impressed. This was a clear and succinct presentation in such a short time. Thanks❤️

  • @aycoded7840
    @aycoded7840 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I've really loved the evolution of editing on your channel over the years, not that the old style dented the quality.

  • @AFacemarkedbyFea
    @AFacemarkedbyFea ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Theres a german joke: how do you recognize a french tank? By the rear view mirror

    • @aaftiyoDkcdicurak
      @aaftiyoDkcdicurak ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I believe the saying goes, the French copy no one and no one copy's the French 😆

    • @anonygent
      @anonygent ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LOL. Love a good French joke. This is one I hadn't heard before.

    • @BladeValant546
      @BladeValant546 ปีที่แล้ว

      At the start of the war the French actually had the best tanks. They just assumed they were support so they didn't build a bunch. French also lost so many in WWI so they didn't have a fully equipped military.

    • @SweetSniper5197
      @SweetSniper5197 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BladeValant546 wait what. The Panzer ii was much better than the R.35s or whatever they had?

  • @Quickshot0
    @Quickshot0 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I had kind of expected you'd also highlight how the annexations of Austria and part of Czechoslovakia really helped in adding war materials and industries to the Germany army, helping to vastly accelerate the buildup beyond what would otherwise be possible. Also by taking their financial resources, the Nazi could delay just another year or two that their economy would implode from their unsustainable spending.
    Thus basically the looting had already started beforehand due to that, and was part of what led to the even larger army to deal with. It also led to an army that had gotten some practice in coordinating moving in to another country and annexing it. Get a live practice twice obviously will help a bit.
    In that light, as is typically thought these days, the surrendering of those countries was a vast mistake. Something which probably in part has led to Europe being less willing to let Russia annex Ukraine if they can do something about it. Which creates an interesting modern historical connection to this all.

  • @PoopSagots
    @PoopSagots ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That wink at the end made me act up and awaken something in me

  • @salt-clips
    @salt-clips ปีที่แล้ว +5

    as a german who got told by my grantparents more details there are missing some important things. you didnt mention fe that no one, not even in germany wanted war up until the end

  • @xeotri
    @xeotri ปีที่แล้ว +5

    12:35 bro just got done playing a video game

  • @malte553
    @malte553 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Great video, but the incorrect maps throughout it make me very angry ;(
    - Austria wasn't incooperated into the German Reich until March of 1938
    - Same thing for the so called 'Sudetenland' which was added into the Reich in October of 1938
    - And you completely forgot East Prussia which was a part of the Weimar Republic and later Nazi Germany, but was seperated from it because of the Danzig area which was given to Poland after World War One. The retaking of this strategic position in order to connect East Prussia back to the rest of Germany also was a major motivator for Hitler to declare war on Poland in September 1939.
    Other than that it's a great video! Keep up the good work :)

    • @alextinlin4347
      @alextinlin4347 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Also he forgot about Czechoslovakia 🤔

    • @wiltedrosie2681
      @wiltedrosie2681 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      he clearly was not going through every single step in the war

    • @MiyashiruX
      @MiyashiruX ปีที่แล้ว

      The point of the video was explaining how Hitler managed to gain so much power in a short span of time. It was never about how the war played out after he started it~ The relevant part of this video ended at 11:00, anything after that is just a loose tidbit of what came after~

    • @marlondavidson6540
      @marlondavidson6540 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The video is 17 mins lol u expect him to go thru every thing 🤷🏾🥴🥴🥴🥴🤡🤡😂🥴🤡🥴

    • @originalsusser
      @originalsusser ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@marlondavidson6540 yes.. I always expect accuracy & his inaccurate maps could belie other inaccuracies in his narrative no matter how long his presentation is, think about it don't just emoji it like a child

  • @michaelgirouard
    @michaelgirouard ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Don’t forget that the strongest ally of Germany prior to the beginning of WWII was Russia and Russia really paved the way for Germany’s success in Poland and Eastern Europe. Had Germany not attacked Russia and thereby making an enemy of their strongest ally the war could have turned out very differently.

    • @Mozam237
      @Mozam237 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      No, not really. The USSR had already thought of the possibility of Hitler invading and planned to heavily militarised in case of a German invasion. Henceforth *if* Hitler had not invaded so early the soviets would’ve been ready and since he expected to win before winter(which as you know didn’t go as planned) he decided to invade early

    • @neilwilliams929
      @neilwilliams929 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very true Michael " Or strangely enough hitler declaring war on the u.s .Hitler was a strange little man ....NO logic NO common sense .LUNATICS running the asylum Difference is Not everyone in Germany were MAD .and that was the sad thing

    • @dod4769
      @dod4769 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mozam237 ? i heard that stalin didn't care about it.
      Yeah the generals did, But "Stalin" was in charge

    • @Mozam237
      @Mozam237 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dod4769 well, you get my point. Thanks for the correction tho

    • @Mozam237
      @Mozam237 ปีที่แล้ว

      @noturbusiness123 how so

  • @Abel0528
    @Abel0528 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:10 "The man with the tiny mustache" 😂😂😂😂

  • @coffeeisgood102
    @coffeeisgood102 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    In my possession I am fortunate enough to have a two volume history of WWl written in the 1920’s which is BEFORE the start of WWll. Of course, the book is not titled “WWl”, as the second war had not broke out yet. It was called “The Great War”. The book covers the political and cultural of attitudes for over twenty years leading up to the beginning of that war. It continues to the very end and including the Versailles treaty and everyone involved in great detail. Most of the people, including the judges and accused have been long forgotten and their names would not be recognized today, except for very serious historians. I am fortunate to have that book and see the perspective which is not clouded by the events of the Second World War.

  • @Gemini540
    @Gemini540 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    A Thoughty2 video will NEVER receive a "Too long, didn't watch" from me. I wish they were longer!

    • @jensphiliphohmann1876
      @jensphiliphohmann1876 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Though, the vid being as short as scarcely a third of an our enabled me to watch it at once while waiting for a delayed train.

    • @Lgnds_CBZ
      @Lgnds_CBZ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This comment needs more likes and attention

  • @FJcruisemissile
    @FJcruisemissile ปีที่แล้ว

    Your mustache and accent give me chill bumps 😂 great content sir 🎉

  • @Minosofficiel3836
    @Minosofficiel3836 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    he took the sentance "everybody love a comeback story" to the next level

  • @W1HURI
    @W1HURI ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Germany: i attack again?
    Europe: no
    Germany: i attack

  • @fbx17
    @fbx17 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Posting this on the same day as England vs Germany is the height of irony

    • @bendover4773
      @bendover4773 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      not really

    • @firstnamelastname9215
      @firstnamelastname9215 ปีที่แล้ว

      You should’ve been at Auschwitz’s in 1943

    • @nyzrh
      @nyzrh ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meh...not rlly

    • @bendover4773
      @bendover4773 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nyzrh no hard feelings mate x

    • @pistolgrip772
      @pistolgrip772 ปีที่แล้ว

      still letting simple games distract you from the real problems?

  • @sainteangelo4662
    @sainteangelo4662 ปีที่แล้ว

    You probably won’t see this but I fondly remember my brothers and I watching you, danger dolan, and dark 5 many years ago. I Haven’t seen your vids in years, so I’m glad you’re still posting.

  • @MariaMolina-gw8qw
    @MariaMolina-gw8qw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tutorials crazy. Cant wait to try it out

  • @randomthing9712
    @randomthing9712 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    1:03 is the best question of 2022 right now

  • @MrRez808
    @MrRez808 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    I really do love your content. It's factual and fun at the same time :)

    • @MrRez808
      @MrRez808 ปีที่แล้ว

      @tou siuey agreed

    • @RandomRothbardian
      @RandomRothbardian ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn’t take an economics major to figure out what printing money to make up for debt is bad for. 80 years later Biden “money printer go brrrr”

    • @jeremyjones453
      @jeremyjones453 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It might be fun, but his statements and illustrations are pretty factually wrong.

    • @rswow
      @rswow ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeremyjones453 And slanderous. Shocking in the internet age when he can survey the other side of the story easily.

    • @delltawnnorthri7459
      @delltawnnorthri7459 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Watch Europa the last battle

  • @40kq
    @40kq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fun fact. The war tactic "Blitzkrieg" wasn't a German-made tactic. But rather it was a tactic made by a British General Percy Hobart. The German who had claimed the tactic Hans Guderian, got his tactics from Percy Hobart. It's documented that he had every page that General Percy Hobart published translated to German.
    For anyone asking how I know this. I learned it from the youtuber "The Fat Electrician" he is a really good Historian.

  • @SuperMrBentley
    @SuperMrBentley ปีที่แล้ว +26

    really love your channel Thoughty, you explan things in an easy and concise way and of course unbiased

    • @sudilos1172
      @sudilos1172 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      unveiled my ass this video is pure propaganda

    • @rswow
      @rswow ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Extreme bias actually is evident if you've studied sensibly the other side of the story.

    • @rodrigo.gibson
      @rodrigo.gibson ปีที่แล้ว

      haters gonna hate

  • @2horses4U
    @2horses4U ปีที่แล้ว +6

    SUPER good episode! As always, bravo!

  • @jonaskup1
    @jonaskup1 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I have to point out a graphical mistake. Germany didn't look on the map like that until the Munich Agreement in 1938 which took Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia. Othervise great vidieo!

    • @thebreadic5488
      @thebreadic5488 ปีที่แล้ว

      He did get a lot of Basic facts wrong too

    • @thisisSpeck
      @thisisSpeck ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thebreadic5488 really which ones

    • @thebreadic5488
      @thebreadic5488 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thisisSpeck I wrote a longer comment, but Stalingrad is Missing from Germany, During the Times of the Weimar Republik, Germany hadnt yet invaded Austria , france was invaded thruogh the Ardennes Not the maggionot Line, etc

  • @hallofr
    @hallofr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks this has helped me in my endeavors

  • @mbhvnnbbbkarglich4184
    @mbhvnnbbbkarglich4184 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Little mistake: France alone had a stronger army by soldiers also then germany in 1939. (France 5.000.000; Germany 4.522.000 (1939) - to find on de.statista) Germany had not the strongest army but the most explosive force for the first days/weeks of the war and also the surprise effect, with (like you mentioned) the Blitz Krieg tactics. Thats the reason why they got few kilometers before Moskau in 1941 ,and occupied the BeNeLux Countries and France inside 2-3 months in 1939. They had problems with supplies (shown at the war against the Soviets) but at the first few weeks they were pretty strong because of the Luftwaffe and the Panzerdivisions.
    Important: Germany was at war against a few countries at the beginning of the war, not 50. Countries like: France, Belgium, the United Kingdom, Poland and a few more. But NOT against the Soviet Union and the USA. The US didnt want to go to war, shown on surveys in the US at that time (because of WW1). After Pearl Habor they joined. So at the beginning, Germanys standing in the war was not quite as bad as it seems in 1939. But when the US joined and Germany attacked the Soviets, Germany lost controll over the battle in 1941.

    • @robertrosano1964
      @robertrosano1964 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Germany had pervitin plan and simple.

  • @robinmuller6392
    @robinmuller6392 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The efficiency and a bit of surprise

    • @benkyle76
      @benkyle76 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And a lot of Meth

    • @robinmuller6392
      @robinmuller6392 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@benkyle76 oh yeah good old tank chocolate 😅

  • @clockworkfoxproductions7310
    @clockworkfoxproductions7310 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hitler: "we have the ultimate army"
    Europe: "oh yeah, well we have more pastries"

  • @Frosty_tha_Snowman
    @Frosty_tha_Snowman ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:54 Thoughty2 can make a *rhyme anytime..* 3:36 I mean, of course he *can, he's the mustache man.*

  • @aintijustthecutest3863
    @aintijustthecutest3863 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nazi Germany looked like a grizzly demon wolf/dragon in the middle of Europe. Quite intimidating.

  • @renzocheesman6844
    @renzocheesman6844 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ill never get bored of this channel

  • @dabajabaza111
    @dabajabaza111 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I'd actually like to see a part 2 of this. You did a fantastic job explaining everything leading up to their dominance, it'd be nice to have a sequel highlighting their height and fall.

    • @bondgabebond4907
      @bondgabebond4907 ปีที่แล้ว

      Want more on Hitler and the Nazis? Read books by Joseph P. Farrell. He will open an entirely new world of craziness. Ever hear of the Nazi Bell?

    • @FibonacciSnow
      @FibonacciSnow ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bondgabebond4907 👽

  • @exco_preacher
    @exco_preacher 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful video, well done!

  • @leocarmopereira
    @leocarmopereira ปีที่แล้ว

    As always, great work.

  • @GardomBeatz
    @GardomBeatz ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The fact that you made this vidéo shows you know exactly whats coming thoughty 2.
    Love your vids!

  • @mcserj7980
    @mcserj7980 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great content.. We crave more of this!!!

  • @user-hx5xq6tl9f
    @user-hx5xq6tl9f ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I love these uploads,! So interesting and engaging, minus the cussing you’d make a brilliant teacher…. you even look like one 😂

    • @foquslab8843
      @foquslab8843 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      nah teachers should swear

    • @user-hx5xq6tl9f
      @user-hx5xq6tl9f ปีที่แล้ว

      @@foquslab8843 I would', funking loads if u wouldn't get the sack ;)

    • @Jason-px1qz
      @Jason-px1qz ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed 👍💯 especially when he's wearing those nifty ol suspenders... Looks like a half drunk professor in a cheap community college 👌😃👍

    • @JmKrokY
      @JmKrokY ปีที่แล้ว

      True

  • @Bi_penguin
    @Bi_penguin ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact this is coming up on a year is insane

  • @sjg531
    @sjg531 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Great explanation! I knew some of these things, but the way you put it all together makes it all cohesive and understandable. I love your videos

  • @nothinglearnt3831
    @nothinglearnt3831 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    dude, I love watching your videos, you are hilarious, and I even sometimes learn a thing or two.

  • @dj_dojo
    @dj_dojo 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    One factor of the blitzkrieg that is widely underestimated is the massive use of amphetamine for all parts of the army, from air force down to the infantry.

  • @decker528
    @decker528 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Without condoning their actions, you have to be impressed with the way Germany managed to become a powerhouse overnight....twice

    • @Jetghostwolf
      @Jetghostwolf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Careful any kind words towards then Germany or maybe even disagreement with some narratives will get you accused of being a nazi.

    • @warlocksunited2e580
      @warlocksunited2e580 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They didnt, germany was building up its economy and steelworks, indirectly preparing for WW2 during wilhelms rule and immediately after 1919, germany most certainly did not become a powerhouse overnight, also, remember germany has far greater struggles it was enduring than building up its military, like the econmic crisis of 1923 and 1929.

    • @decker528
      @decker528 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@warlocksunited2e580 in the late 1800s, German became a powerhouse literally overnight when all the German states merged together. Germany was suddenly the strongest country in Europe

    • @arai6147
      @arai6147 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@decker528basically super namek

    • @luciferjohnson8495
      @luciferjohnson8495 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@warlocksunited2e580they did

  • @patrickcarino989
    @patrickcarino989 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So good needed a part 2 !

  • @Joe-ns4ek
    @Joe-ns4ek ปีที่แล้ว +85

    I always appreciate when he uploads. No matter what it is I end the video learning something interesting. Great video as always :)

  • @kitsunedotexe3587
    @kitsunedotexe3587 ปีที่แล้ว

    i naturally saluted the end of the video as you said "thanks for watching" and it gave me chills xD

  • @grimmsoul3096
    @grimmsoul3096 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    10:12 which is better for defense? a plane or a anti plane turret? a tank or a anti tank gun? a army ready to move out at a moments notice or a couple bunkers with machine guns? seriously the political powers should follow the treaty to the letter

  • @johncox2865
    @johncox2865 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    15:01
    The original stated purpose of tanks in WW I was infantry support. They were never envisioned as fighting other tanks. Indeed, when the British first introduced tanks in WW I, Germany had no tanks at all.

    • @jlyngdoh5608
      @jlyngdoh5608 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually the Germans weren't that far off in terms of AFVs in WWI. The A7V came out shortly after the first couple of models of British Tanks

  • @leviathantoobz
    @leviathantoobz ปีที่แล้ว +70

    My late grandma who lived through both world wars always claimed that both wars were a continuous war with a 20 year intermission in the middle…
    Blitzkrieg was crazy.
    Edit: typos (lived was accidentally loved)

    • @DaMichl1
      @DaMichl1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TRUE

    • @Krissdafish
      @Krissdafish ปีที่แล้ว +8

      How did she know there was a war going on if she made love all the way through both?

    • @pauliusiv6169
      @pauliusiv6169 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      i have to agree with your late grandma ww1 and ww2 weren't seperate conflicts, they were a two-parter in a second thirty years war

    • @markbaker5599
      @markbaker5599 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Krissdafish she had some crazy stamina

    • @WokerThanThou
      @WokerThanThou ปีที่แล้ว

      ... and it all started 108 years ago in Sarajevo because of a Bosnian Serb assassinating the next king of the AustriaHungary empire next to Ukraine.

  • @jackhollis7787
    @jackhollis7787 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love that Switzerland is just chillin surrounded by Germany

  • @R0DBS
    @R0DBS ปีที่แล้ว

    a 17:45 second video taught me more than 45 minutes in history class.

  • @Jonathan_Strange
    @Jonathan_Strange ปีที่แล้ว +187

    What an incredible video! As someone else here mentioned they're probably learned more about WWII in 18 minutes than a whole term of History class (or something like that).
    Well presented, well thought out, great delivery.

    • @BigZoe99
      @BigZoe99 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Just say you slept through class dude. This 18min video doesn't teach you shit. Gives a few anecdotes that you didn't know but overall you know about this ww2 subject cz it was taught in school ad nauseum

    • @Janiik
      @Janiik ปีที่แล้ว +5

      bro that video has so many mistakes and plainly wrong facts, austria is part of the republic but eastern prussia not?
      no offense the video is mostly true but theres so much missing even if the video tries to only concentrate on certain parts mistakes like these are just unacceptable

    • @nullifiedpntr
      @nullifiedpntr ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Janiik agreed

    • @xcxjcxfjff5656
      @xcxjcxfjff5656 ปีที่แล้ว

      W pfp

    • @jackmclaughlin9911
      @jackmclaughlin9911 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Janiik the American school system is crap. people who have graduated college have said Poland and Germany were Allies and America gained independence from South Korea 💀💀

  • @liamd630
    @liamd630 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Most entertaining thing I've seen all week, thanks thoughty

  • @prokemongaming5149
    @prokemongaming5149 ปีที่แล้ว

    What background music do you use, its so good

  • @willaddison3281
    @willaddison3281 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You did a great job in this video.

  • @Akuroxradio
    @Akuroxradio ปีที่แล้ว +3

    excellent research! another great video!

  • @emag1169
    @emag1169 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ahhhh thankyou Thoughty2 I'm just about to climb into bed, perfect timing for an awesome video, 🙏🏼

  • @heavyweightchampionofdaworld
    @heavyweightchampionofdaworld ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved this so much. What an awesome video

  • @MrSurvivalgecoLP
    @MrSurvivalgecoLP ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another thing is that when they had to reduce the size of their army, they pretty much exclusively kept their officers and most experienced NCOs, really transforming those 100,000 they were allowed to keep into the most disciplined and competent military leaders in the world. Once they stopped playing ball with the rest of the world, adding the common soldiers took much less time.

  • @F.R.E.D.D2986
    @F.R.E.D.D2986 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    Very simple:
    Blitzkrieg. A tatic no one could fight effectively for the first couple of years, with a well trained, well equipped, army with high discipline and morale, with air superiority and well seasoned generals.
    You aren't going to win against that when you aren't ready
    Edit: Yes, hes correct, Blitzkrieg was thought of afterward ww2

    • @milhousevanhoutan9235
      @milhousevanhoutan9235 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Combined Arms tactics were happened upon by all powers more or less simultaneously by the end of World War I. If you look at the Battle of Meggido in 1918 you see the British employing tactics that are in principle blitzkrieg, the only difference being the level of mechanization though Germany still did a lot of WWII on horseback*. In fact combined arms tactics were the de facto standard for Britain and (in theory) France by the end of the war. DeGaull focused heavily on concentration into armor and mobile infantry because he knew his country could not and would not support the massive conscription army of the past. He also (not that it wasn't obvious) correctly identified that the case yellow of penetrating through the Ardennes and invading Belgum would be the most obvious places to concentrate this force for defensive purposes.
      Unfortunately France was a political mess of WWI, despite the reputation they got after WWII the reality is France stood and died in the trenches in WWI and they still hadn't recovered from the level of generational loss it entailed. This political mess included meddling in what should have been purely military affairs and DeGaull wasn't popular with the political leaders because of his ideas of modernizing the army and making it smaller (but better trained professionals), as well as investing more heavily in aircraft and anti-air defense, mostly because the former was seen as a massive break from "tradition" and what had served France so well for centuries. So they didn't listen to him and as a result when Case Yellow occurred the concentrated combined arms army DeGaull had built was not concentrated but was being used to reinforce the Maginot Line as opposed to covering the major hole it DIDN'T cover.
      France collapsed not because of a deficiency with their military acumen but because of political interference and a lack of will to fight on behalf of the political leaders. There is a REASON why Charles DeGaull was the leader of the French Government in Exile.
      *On horses- They were so important to the Nazi War Machine that in the book D-Day through German Eyes Eckhart quotes a German Soldier as saying "One thing that astonished us is all along the beach there was not one horse!... This huge army had brought with it not one single horse or pack mule, all of their transport was mechanized, and I knew we had lost the war."

    • @ABeastMadeOfSteel
      @ABeastMadeOfSteel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@milhousevanhoutan9235 Thank you, someone who doesn't state something as fact because a clickbait youtuber told them so. I've actually seen that the Germans didn't even use the word blitzkrieg, and they were literally just using their same tactics from WWI just with more inclusion of aircraft and tanks.

    • @F.R.E.D.D2986
      @F.R.E.D.D2986 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@milhousevanhoutan9235 There is whole host of reasons and that is absolutely correct

    • @F.R.E.D.D2986
      @F.R.E.D.D2986 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ABeastMadeOfSteel they called it Bewhengenkrieg
      I can't spell it to save my life

    • @ABeastMadeOfSteel
      @ABeastMadeOfSteel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@F.R.E.D.D2986 but it wasn't really called anything till after the war and it was literally the same tactics they used in WWI except a more heavy integration of armor and aircraft.

  • @basedchango2172
    @basedchango2172 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    I think Germany's major advantage throughout history was the sheer strength and superiority of it's army. Germany blitzkrieging through multiple nations was not new, during the victorian era the Kingdom of Prussia united Germany and defeated Denmark, France, and Austria. France and Austria were major military powers and were both defeated in a very short time due to the tactics and strategies the Germans conducted. In WW1 Germany had no ally that could really help them and Germany carried the Central Powers throughout WW1, eventually being defeated by the fact that an Army marches on it's belly.

    • @Dmitrinr
      @Dmitrinr ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I have to disagree, the german army was inferior in many situations (specially on their victories) to their enemies, what really made germany win was the sheer quality of their infantry training and combined operations, wich was almost aways handicapped by terrible logistical management and planning.

    • @jayantasen2406
      @jayantasen2406 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dmitrinr better trained army = superior army though, in general sense.

    • @Dmitrinr
      @Dmitrinr ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jayantasen2406 Not necessarily, the german army was so badly led it barely made a difference when in the offensive, most of their succes was due to their enemies incompetence, from weserubung to fall blau, it just took their enemies a little bit of competence and skillfull manouver and the german army was useless.

    • @jayantasen2406
      @jayantasen2406 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Dmitrinr German army from WW2 was probably the best led forces amongst them all, at least in the first 3 years of the war when they could bank on experienced NCOs and COs. If you label them as incompetent then every allied army would be trash. And Italy would be out of the discussion 😅

    • @Dmitrinr
      @Dmitrinr ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jayantasen2406 That's exactly the point, micro management, probaly to the level of a general or few armies would be certainly one of the best, but that doesnt change much if the ones who are planning the whole operation are complete retards who lack any real knowledge of logistics and real commanding experience, that was the case of the German army, an excellent micro, but a downring hilarious macro, if you look closely to any german military operation in ww2 and even WW1, you can quite easily notice that, an excellent example was Fall Gelb, the entire german plan was to put as many tanks on the ardeness as possible, even thought they KNEW that they could be spotted, and in that case, not only would they be completely denied a quick surprise, quite possibly, their entire mechanized divisions would've been anihilated, the fact is, the French and British SAW the army, reconaissence planes sppoted them for several days, but the french army simply ignored it, the French high command dubbed it as "Implossible", "Hilarious" and "defeatism", they CHOSE not to engage that threat and also CHOSE not to believe in it, arguably, the greated german Victory of WW2 only happened because the germans where slightly more intelligent than their enemies.

  • @88vindo
    @88vindo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This why you need thoughty2 .....
    Best way of storytelling....,!

  • @joeandseancooking
    @joeandseancooking ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video but checking through the comments is also very informative so I have learned

  • @jamesstaggs4160
    @jamesstaggs4160 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I think there's something about the whole Russia/Ukraine thing that we're not getting. For some reason I don't think Russia has gone "all out" a single time since it began. You can talk about how much help they're getting, how high the morale of the defending troops are and how low the morale of the attacker's, but that's not going to make up for the massive gap between the two.

    • @syNM94
      @syNM94 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think it is simple. If Russia went all out, other nations would not take it lightly even if they wished to. So, going all-in for Russia would mean being prepared for Military repercussions across the globe.

    • @nigget-tv-videos4135
      @nigget-tv-videos4135 ปีที่แล้ว

      ukraine have the money, weapons, intelligence and support of the might of nato, add the banning of russian goods to, really russia are prob doing as best as any nation could v's nato- sadly even telling the truth about those above facts is seen as pro putin, we live in a time when truth comes 2nd place to propaganda

    • @DimaZeru
      @DimaZeru ปีที่แล้ว

      That's basically it. Russia is fighting a proxy war with NATO that would have sooner or later "come to bring PEACE" just without the russians on the face of the earth, so if a fight is hard to avoid - you strike first. It's stupid to say Russia didn't want to solve this peacefully - applied to NATO membership, had the Minsk agreements in place, waited for 8 years for France and Germany to convince the clown to ent the so called "Anti Terrorist Operation" in Donbass.

  • @DaveSohan
    @DaveSohan ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Absolutely well done video! So glad I clicked on it.

  • @phoebeTaylorsversion29
    @phoebeTaylorsversion29 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where was this during my GCSE’s

  • @derphael_4337
    @derphael_4337 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    16:40 As a German, that poorly translated pun gave me a bit of a chuckle :)