I don’t hear Eric narrate my chess but I do find myself using his common terms or sayings while playing. Like “oh no my queen” or “the pawns are smiling” etc
I definitely use Rosenisms since watching the speedrun series. "I think I'll be happy to..." "Let's continue development here." "I think I just win a piece in this line."
I don't hear you narrating my games, and I watch you quite a bit. However, I don't know how to quickly identify chess notation, so my inner thoughts are never "knight e3", "bishop d3", etc.
You don't even need a passport to get into Canada. A driver's license will do. Of course, you WILL need a passport to come back, so there's that. :) 3:09 World Champion Stalemaster! OTOH, Eric, you never know when a mental gestalt will close, and how far you can go. :) First game: I think this is the earliest I've ever seen an opponent resign on Eric.
1:55:38 Eric stumbles into the problem of calling an attack on three pieces a triple fork. Then an attack on two pieces is a double fork, one less than triple, but that's just a fork! So maybe attacking three pieces is only a double fork in the same way a double hat-trick is four goals/wickets/feats (one more than three). Or perhaps, to retain the definitions of a triple fork and a regular fork, it's an attack on three different pairs of pieces (e.g. KR, RQ, QK), so three different forks and thus a triple fork. In this case, it's only possible to have a regular fork (1 fork, 2 pieces), a triple fork (3 forks, 3 pieces), a sextuple fork (6 forks, 4 pieces), a decuple fork (10 forks, 5 pieces) etc. That is n choose 2, where n is the number of pieces attacked. Now I want to know what the largest (n-choose-2)-uple fork could be!
If a fork is between two pieces, a double fork would be 4 pieces, and a triple fork 6 pieces! So when you fork 3 pieces it would be a 1.5x fork... right?
Think about a fork that you eat with. If it has 3 tines you'd call it a triple-fork, 2 tines is a double fork. If it has 1 tine then it's not a fork, it's a spike.
My inner Eric only says "what to do.." because I often have no idea.
what to do..
I don’t hear Eric narrate my chess but I do find myself using his common terms or sayings while playing. Like “oh no my queen” or “the pawns are smiling” etc
1:16:25 Oh God, you blundering the pawn and opponent blundering the rook was an emotional rollercoaster.
I definitely use Rosenisms since watching the speedrun series.
"I think I'll be happy to..."
"Let's continue development here."
"I think I just win a piece in this line."
I definitely follow Eric’s thought patterns now when playing my own games. Also, I have learned to be calm during blitz games. Thanks Eric!
To jettison jetlag just jump into jammie’s for a jiffy and journey into dreamland.
03:28 - Yes, I just hear "oh no" on repeat.
Yeah I definitely use your language to help me break down my own positions. It actually helps me alot.
3:28 I hear a voice saying "there's a funny line" whenever I'm calculating something
I don't hear you narrating my games, and I watch you quite a bit. However, I don't know how to quickly identify chess notation, so my inner thoughts are never "knight e3", "bishop d3", etc.
You don't even need a passport to get into Canada. A driver's license will do. Of course, you WILL need a passport to come back, so there's that. :)
3:09 World Champion Stalemaster! OTOH, Eric, you never know when a mental gestalt will close, and how far you can go. :)
First game: I think this is the earliest I've ever seen an opponent resign on Eric.
I wonder how many tuesdays are there in a week? Today is sunday and this video was uploaded 4 hours ago. It is now 8pm in UK
T I 100& narrate my chess games with your voice in my head. I'll be analyzing a position and hear out of nowhere 'oh theres a funny line'
Ah, perfect way to start the day.
1:28:57 WOW I had the same expression in my face!!
I hear Hikaru saying his self commentary phrases in my head.
yes. eric rosen and ben finegold narrate all my games
nice lazy tuesdau
1:55:38 Eric stumbles into the problem of calling an attack on three pieces a triple fork. Then an attack on two pieces is a double fork, one less than triple, but that's just a fork! So maybe attacking three pieces is only a double fork in the same way a double hat-trick is four goals/wickets/feats (one more than three). Or perhaps, to retain the definitions of a triple fork and a regular fork, it's an attack on three different pairs of pieces (e.g. KR, RQ, QK), so three different forks and thus a triple fork. In this case, it's only possible to have a regular fork (1 fork, 2 pieces), a triple fork (3 forks, 3 pieces), a sextuple fork (6 forks, 4 pieces), a decuple fork (10 forks, 5 pieces) etc. That is n choose 2, where n is the number of pieces attacked. Now I want to know what the largest (n-choose-2)-uple fork could be!
If a fork is between two pieces, a double fork would be 4 pieces, and a triple fork 6 pieces! So when you fork 3 pieces it would be a 1.5x fork... right?
Think about a fork that you eat with. If it has 3 tines you'd call it a triple-fork, 2 tines is a double fork. If it has 1 tine then it's not a fork, it's a spike.
You could also play the Cabbage
How is winner decided when you scored equal points?
The Buchholz system is the first tie break, then there are various other tie breaks after that.
No no no no no no no 😂😂😂
Fix your sleep schedule Eric