Just hoping the next Labour gov dont repeat history! (should that be the Labour party or the Dole and immigrants party; as they ditched the workers back in the 80's)
I actually stood next to the TSR2 that was 2 minutes from flying before the project was cancelled last week. Amazing piece of engineering, such a shame it wasn't completed and that all the work went to waste.
Je regrette que la France n'est pas voulue coopérer avec UK. Car dans le passé nous avions réalisés deux projets bien en avance sur les autres Jaguar et Concorde, avec vous on aurait réalisé surement un 6eme génération que le monde nous envierait.
I think that Jaguar was a a bad aircraft. It basicaly had two hairdryers flying in close formation as engines. And Concorde, well just how the French ripped us off on that one. Brought in to help fund the programme, secret data was given to them. We should, as a nation, never ever collabtorte with France. Besides, the killed Concorde by sheer negligence
Vous avez décidé de travailler avec l'Espagne et l'Allemagne sur votre propre concept. Parce que la France est désormais la seule grande puissance militaire de l'UE, elle veut s'assurer qu'elle dirige tous les projets de défense et n'est disposée à coopérer sur de nouveaux projets qu'avec d'autres membres de l'UE.
@@saundyuk France is not the lead military power in the Eu. Most of its navy ships are 30 years old, the CDG carrier is so FUBAR it cant even make 13 kts and never leaves port. Its tanks are useless and the Rafale has an 18% serviceability, plus, history ahs shown, when there is trouble, just where is Jonnie Frog? Oh runa away
If anyone has looked into the production of this aircraft, they'll be aware of how modular it is. Meaning they can alter the shape of the wings & tail sections easily for different configurations. You would understand this if you were aware of the production facility that has been built to produce the aircraft. To say it's like something out of the future is an understatement. They're cutting down the usual 4 to 5 years production & testing of wing configurations to 100 days. They're doing this by manufacturing these configurations with the world's most advanced 3D printers. Meaning one version can be built for the Royal Navy, one can be a specialist air to air fighter, one a drone controller & so on. This is massively reducing costs. It's telling all major fighter aircraft producers are now looking to follow this route of production. To say it might be controversial spending the money on this aircraft instead of upgrading the F-35b couldn't be further from the facts. The single main reason the British decided to build their own gen 6 aircraft was the F-35b & it's terrible performance for the costs to keep it flying. Only it would be controversial to mention this fact publicly. The facts are the F-35 in all configurations has been a massive disappointment. It's capabilities aren't anywhere near the expected ones. It isn't only the British who decided to build their own aircraft after receiving the F-35 either. If you think about it, if the F-35 was so good why feel the need to go to all that expense building a completely new aircraft yourself?
Accurately stated …by you. With the F35 the US MICC managed to produce a really expensive poorly performing hanger Queen, that proves that the MICC is all about money …..not about producing a top aircraft.
The F35 is not a terrible aircraft in the slightest. Thats a load of bollocks. Its the most state of the art fighter in the air and its extremely small radar cross section, capability to network with other craft, drones and systems, and its highly advanced sensor suite make it far superior to anything else currently in the air. Dogfighting doesnt matter anymore, being able to acquire targets and shoot your missiles before the enemy can even acquire you means you win. Remember in any realistic scenario it will be working in theatre with american aircraft so the connectivity will really come in to play there as well. Theres so much anti-f35 nonsense out there that is stuck in the mentality of yesterdays air wars and misses the point of why its so good.
i like the sleek, minimalistic, clean futuristic look it has. its a good look and a cool name. But, the f-35 tho. it is probably a flop but even so its pretty redundant. the purpose was to make a next generation CAS for a conflict for near peer countries. and you are right to say that a lot of things coming out of America are triple decadent when it comes to logistics. really expensive and costly to maintain. making something practical like tempest with low cost and reduced time really is a way to go... but America does good by its technology. even if its triple redundant and sometimes makes huge financial blunders with its enormous budget. but i dont think the F-35 is entirely useless. just really costly and almost pointless. especially that America will probably never be in a near peer conflict. China if at all. but F-35 is supposed to be the most advanced electronically, with the best radar best spoofing, best missile defense, so and so. i think America could profit from this approach in their defense spending. instead of emphasizing on all the bells and whistles that will probably go over budget and be a logistical nightmare they could try to aim for simplicity and practicality. the tempest looks great. im happy that the UK is on our side. I hope America can try to take note and explore this approach more often instead of spending a pretty penny on everything that looks flashy.
Some of the 3D pitcures used are actually from Tai TFX 5th Gen Turkish program you can see clearly in 6:08 the logo of TAI aerospace (Turkish aerospace)
@@saundyuk Not partnering old son, no company is "partnering". They have been asked to participate. It is a marketing ploy to trounce the EuSSR and Yanks so they will also buy the platforms. If you dont know defence, or not an defence engineer, stick to your comics
Sharp eyed commenters have noticed the Turkish Aerospace logo on some of the renderings, such as at 6:08 I don’t know all the details but there may be similarities between the Tempest 6th generation fighter and the Tai TF-X 5th generation fighter because British Aerospace signed a £100 million contract to provide engineering assistance to Turkish Aerospace. Rolls Royce is also involved.
Also because originally Turkey had plans to fast track a 6 th gen with Britain, things fell apart! The real question is how are all of these countries jumping from 4th generation fighters that were sold by the US to them and now are able to skip 5th gen and build 6th????
At exactly 3:53 in the video one sees the innovation. The electricity generator on current engines is powered by a PTO shaft. On this engine, power generation is embedded within the engine.
A Multirole fighter needs to be developed alongside Tempest that is catapult capable and to keep development and maintenance costs down it would share a lot of parts with Tempest
@@jammiedodger7040 Our carriers have jump ramps not catapults I'm guessing they will have some insane thrust vector capabilities to help with take off like we have with our F35Bs
@@bigstevie1690 Queen Elizabeth class is designed to have catapults installed and the space for the catapults is still under the deck and as the multirole fighter jet would not enter service till 2035. So the idea would be to do the Aircraft carriers mid refits earlier.The multirole fighter jet would not be VSTOL but it would be possible to make a sub variant that uses a similar system to what the harrier used as the multirole fighter jet would be a twin engine fighter jet so if a VSTOL sub variant was designed and developed it would be the first twin engine VSTOL fighter jet and it would also be the first 6th generation VSTOL.Also the Multirole Fighter Jet would not really compete with the F-35 because of it being twin engine and 6th generation and one big major difference is the Multirole fighter jet would have one variant for carrier operations (Catapult) and for land operations similar to the F-18 and F-14 but obviously the VSTOL would have to be a separate variant but the aim would be for both variants to be as similar as possible when it comes to parts so it is like operating one variant Multirole Fighter Jet, Multirole Fighter Jet VSTOL and Tempers but obviously Tempest would be a completely different airframe but would share a lot of parts with the Multirole Fighter Jet for commonality.
I agree that makes sense. The Royal Navy is clearly being expanded and built up in power. If they just build it as a navalised aircraft the RAF can share it with the Royal Navy just like it could with the f35c or f18 Superhornet if they had bought those instead of the f35b.
Now that's what I have been talking about. That thing is more compressor than high volume raptor engine and acts like a rocket engine from what I just saw on the videos.
Amazing how these prototypes have the same build as the F22 Raptor, which goes to show how advanced and years ahead of the times the Raptor was in its design.
The Tempest mock up is kinda fugly tbh. As for it's resemblance to F22, stealth bring about certain design contraints, even so I think it looks closer to YF23, plus both the wing and cockpit are quite different but I see what you mean.
@@RpattoYT stealth! Your tanks use Chobham armour that’s British so don’t get insulting also the F35B is British technology from Jet powered VTOL & thrust vectoring also came from here as well because Rolls Royce made the Flying Bedstead in the 1950’s during the production of VTOL which gave Russia the idea of using it on their afterburners 24 hours not just 6 o’clock to 12
@@jamesgates6134 same build as in, nothing new. 20 years later, I’m thinking X-wing fighter kinda shit. Well, maybe not the X-wing as that is the worst aerodynamic design ever lol.
So your saying the Eurofighter was a 5th generation jet?? I dont think so...How does one jump from 4th to 6th? I'm open to explanation. Maybe I dont know anything.....
Nope, eurofighter was indeed a 4th generation jet, while it is typically unclear what makes a plane different generations, 5th gen normally means it has stealth capabilities. Countries do not need to go through all the generations, and could buy or make a jet of any generation. The UK has also purchased a small number of F-35s, which are 5th gen however as I said you don’t need to go through generations in order.
What I got from this was.... how vast the US miltary budget truly is. What we spend more than the next 9 countries combined. R&D and having the funds to pay for most of your problems to be solved. Really puts the US "Known" Defence budget into better perspective.
A vast military budget isn't something to be proud of... every dollar comes from somewhere or could be used to improve life for citizens. Millions homeless, crumbling infrastructure, sliding down the ladder of healthcare... but hey at least there's a bomber costing a billion and they've ordered twenty! 😂
It also is a massive help in overspend and the threat of ‘going broke’ The USA , if called upon , cannot pay its debts ! Mind you it is not alone in this - far from it . But there is a potential threat to its ‘reserve currency’ status . And that would hurt.
@@adriangarry659 Too true. We also cancelled the supersonic P.1154 Harrier to save money. Typically, its replacement the Phantom F4 ended up costing much more.
I really do wish the UK was still planning to develop the Tempest 6th gen jet fighter on its own. It really feels like our lack of diversity in looking for other providers to manufacture and develop it doing outside the box searching is what has resulted in us now planning to developing it with Italy and Japan. That cover was Clickbait as hell. I need it even before actually clicking on it, because we all bloody well know what the actual Tempest aircraft is most likely going to look like. These TH-cam Clickbait are just getting ridiculous, and we all know it. Why do TH-cam video releases continue to do this when they know that viewers aren’t that dumb.
Partnering with Italy and Japan isn’t because of “lack of diversity,” working with other countries allows you to pool in your money together and do projects bigger than what those individual countries could pull off.
it looks cool but the wing is so large that its possible to get hit and lose control easily . "but only if it gets hit" i hope its so super nova krazy that it will nova stryke alll targets and threats before anyone can take a aim at it.
You know what the UK should do ? I think it should increase its military budget for a decade from 54 billion dollars to 100 and during that decade improve all it's military capabilities especially defensive capabilities
Problem is over ten years away Uk has a problem with bringing cutting edge technology to the forefront before its middle of the road. If push came to shove this could be flying in 9months but here we are
I have seen a wind tunnel model with this same type of shape at the Farnborough Air Sciences Trust museum, it was claimed to be cancelled in favour of the F35, can some one confirm or disprove this for me, (this model is from some decades ago).
What the tempest is sub-sonic either super-sonic fighter jets ? What's the capacity to load arms and per kms speed thrust ? What kind of radar avonic s technology has added in its ? Is it true that the tempest is 6th generation fighter jets ? When or which year the tempest will be activated. ? When the world people's will see it ?
Might want to work on your grammar a bit. 99% of fighters nowadays are supersonic so I assume the tempest will be to, it will (hopefully) start to be introduced in 2035 and we still don’t know too much as it’s a while off and BAE have said the plane could accommodate new technologies that haven’t even been invented yet
It’s coz of this little thing called money. Pooling money together from multiple countries allows for one big research program so all countries involved get a highly capable plane.
To me, the frame looks to be out of date, i mean why just copy old when you should be designing new & futuristic, check out the US's NGAD programme, i think tempest are missing a trick.
A jet engine can be made even more powerful without resorting to going over the thermal barrier of the high pressure turbines by simply ionising the efflux and accelerating it with a specially designed high voltage anode. This will increase the speed of the efflux without having to carry coolant or other additives. Also, by modulating the anode the efflux jet can also mask the infra red give away signature so making it difficult to lock on with heat seekers etc.
Wow, that sounds simple. Did the Chinese invent this? They claim to invent everything these days, including the ball point pen. I can't imagine what i was using in school though.
@@Fleshox19-uz3qt Nope, I devised it myself but I'm allowing anyone to use and improve it. Atoms and molecules can so easily be ionised when in hot flux. I believe an electric field can be made to cause a status much better than a magnetic field even though the one cannot be without the other.
There are at least 4 different wing shapes,3 different tail fin/ruttervators combo's (over 2000 hours in different versions of the F-15 and you wouldn't demo a secret jet to the public with an open cockpit and roll up stairs for the world to see
Hey mate! Just noticed how you are critiquing an AI voice’s pronunciation, these AI bots simply read out text and don’t care too much about pronunciation
Looks good,i used to work at Rolls Royce quite a number of years...now in retired in Thailand,maybe the goverment can put some money into the pensions of retirees abroad who dont get the increases,id also like the comany building the plane to work with Mercedes F1 team to iron out its problems,we do have 2 Brit drivers,
Lets face it, nobody is going to sell the UK a 6th gen fighter but £250 million and 5 years to design and develop a demonstrator is a bit of a stretch.
Just waiting for 'T.S.R. - 3' now...............to team up with Canada's 'Avro Arrow 2'...........
Absolutely!
Just hoping the next Labour gov dont repeat history! (should that be the Labour party or the Dole and immigrants party; as they ditched the workers back in the 80's)
I actually stood next to the TSR2 that was 2 minutes from flying before the project was cancelled last week.
Amazing piece of engineering, such a shame it wasn't completed and that all the work went to waste.
@@Dan-qg1bq Is that at Cosford or Duxford? Mind you when you look in the huge avionics bay today's technology could get that lot in a fag packet.
BAE is not pronounced ‘bay’. BAE are individual letters…..pronounced B. A. E. Systems
I don't think the computer sers your comment. 😉
Usually a USA defect as they are still attempting English. Most of them refer to their Cuntry as the whole Continent after over 200 years
Relax it's not a real person doing the voiceover
It’s actually B.ae for British aerospace 😉
@@lynby6231 NO it’s British Aerospace Engineering SYSTEMS . B A E Systems
Je regrette que la France n'est pas voulue coopérer avec UK.
Car dans le passé nous avions réalisés deux projets bien en avance sur les autres Jaguar et Concorde, avec vous on aurait réalisé surement un 6eme génération que le monde nous envierait.
I think that Jaguar was a a bad aircraft. It basicaly had two hairdryers flying in close formation as engines. And Concorde, well just how the French ripped us off on that one. Brought in to help fund the programme, secret data was given to them. We should, as a nation, never ever collabtorte with France. Besides, the killed Concorde by sheer negligence
Vous avez décidé de travailler avec l'Espagne et l'Allemagne sur votre propre concept. Parce que la France est désormais la seule grande puissance militaire de l'UE, elle veut s'assurer qu'elle dirige tous les projets de défense et n'est disposée à coopérer sur de nouveaux projets qu'avec d'autres membres de l'UE.
@@saundyuk France is not the lead military power in the Eu. Most of its navy ships are 30 years old, the CDG carrier is so FUBAR it cant even make 13 kts and never leaves port. Its tanks are useless and the Rafale has an 18% serviceability, plus, history ahs shown, when there is trouble, just where is Jonnie Frog? Oh runa away
I'm glad the French aren't in it back stabbing bastards
And russia I don't trust the French at all
The way to go! Bravo, Brits! 👏👏👏
Its how Americans pronounce words,like Aluminium
Yeeee haaàaaa says the man.
It's a computer generation. There's no physical aircraft. It's a nonsensical facade.
@@frank-ko6de it’s not been in development for long at all, so ofc it’s just CAD atm
@@edsalt5281 CAD is another way of saying computer generated animation, a facade like I said, yes?👍👍👍😁😁😁.
If anyone has looked into the production of this aircraft, they'll be aware of how modular it is. Meaning they can alter the shape of the wings & tail sections easily for different configurations. You would understand this if you were aware of the production facility that has been built to produce the aircraft. To say it's like something out of the future is an understatement. They're cutting down the usual 4 to 5 years production & testing of wing configurations to 100 days. They're doing this by manufacturing these configurations with the world's most advanced 3D printers. Meaning one version can be built for the Royal Navy, one can be a specialist air to air fighter, one a drone controller & so on. This is massively reducing costs. It's telling all major fighter aircraft producers are now looking to follow this route of production.
To say it might be controversial spending the money on this aircraft instead of upgrading the F-35b couldn't be further from the facts. The single main reason the British decided to build their own gen 6 aircraft was the F-35b & it's terrible performance for the costs to keep it flying. Only it would be controversial to mention this fact publicly. The facts are the F-35 in all configurations has been a massive disappointment. It's capabilities aren't anywhere near the expected ones. It isn't only the British who decided to build their own aircraft after receiving the F-35 either. If you think about it, if the F-35 was so good why feel the need to go to all that expense building a completely new aircraft yourself?
Accurately stated …by you. With the F35 the US MICC managed to produce a really expensive poorly performing hanger Queen, that proves that the MICC is all about money …..not about producing a top aircraft.
The F35 is not a terrible aircraft in the slightest. Thats a load of bollocks. Its the most state of the art fighter in the air and its extremely small radar cross section, capability to network with other craft, drones and systems, and its highly advanced sensor suite make it far superior to anything else currently in the air. Dogfighting doesnt matter anymore, being able to acquire targets and shoot your missiles before the enemy can even acquire you means you win. Remember in any realistic scenario it will be working in theatre with american aircraft so the connectivity will really come in to play there as well.
Theres so much anti-f35 nonsense out there that is stuck in the mentality of yesterdays air wars and misses the point of why its so good.
There should be an intense investigation into the entire F35 program.
Your "Tempest" appears to be a fantastic & flexible design.
Best of luck!
i like the sleek, minimalistic, clean futuristic look it has. its a good look and a cool name. But, the f-35 tho. it is probably a flop but even so its pretty redundant. the purpose was to make a next generation CAS for a conflict for near peer countries. and you are right to say that a lot of things coming out of America are triple decadent when it comes to logistics. really expensive and costly to maintain. making something practical like tempest with low cost and reduced time really is a way to go... but America does good by its technology. even if its triple redundant and sometimes makes huge financial blunders with its enormous budget. but i dont think the F-35 is entirely useless. just really costly and almost pointless. especially that America will probably never be in a near peer conflict. China if at all. but F-35 is supposed to be the most advanced electronically, with the best radar best spoofing, best missile defense, so and so. i think America could profit from this approach in their defense spending. instead of emphasizing on all the bells and whistles that will probably go over budget and be a logistical nightmare they could try to aim for simplicity and practicality. the tempest looks great. im happy that the UK is on our side. I hope America can try to take note and explore this approach more often instead of spending a pretty penny on everything that looks flashy.
I agree with a lot stated by you except the negative view of the F-35. The F-35 will come into it's own in the future.
Some of the 3D pitcures used are actually from Tai TFX 5th Gen Turkish program you can see clearly in 6:08 the logo of TAI aerospace (Turkish aerospace)
I bet the design team really wanted to name it "Firefox"
It supersedes the Typhoon, both traditional names following Hawker's Typhoon and Tempests from WW2
That's a disappointment, I'd thought whoever named it Tempest might have been a fan of the 1980's arcade game! 😀
SAAB is also part of Team Tempest
gripen is also my fav jet 🏆🏆🏆
SAAB is also majority owned by BAE. It is an all British design
Japan are also part of Team Tempest now and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries will be partnering on the project.
@@saundyuk Not partnering old son, no company is "partnering". They have been asked to participate. It is a marketing ploy to trounce the EuSSR and Yanks so they will also buy the platforms. If you dont know defence, or not an defence engineer, stick to your comics
@@jimwalsh8520 I thought BAE sold it’s steak in Saab
The Tempest project has now been joined by the Japanese 6th gen aircraft project. This means that around 10 governments are now working on Tempest
I think you mean 3 governments, not 10.
1 plus 1 plus 1 equals 3 , not 10
anything against then xixipigs, I’m for it.
@@garypurser8908 UK Italy and Japan
@@404-u5f All we need now is Murica and Germany and it will be engineered to within an inch of it's tailplane!...
Sharp eyed commenters have noticed the Turkish Aerospace logo on some of the renderings, such as at 6:08 I don’t know all the details but there may be similarities between the Tempest 6th generation fighter and the Tai TF-X 5th generation fighter because British Aerospace signed a £100 million contract to provide engineering assistance to Turkish Aerospace. Rolls Royce is also involved.
Also because originally Turkey had plans to fast track a 6 th gen with Britain, things fell apart! The real question is how are all of these countries jumping from 4th generation fighters that were sold by the US to them and now are able to skip 5th gen and build 6th????
Alright UK! I hope there will be secure data sharing modes for use with allied aircraft. Oh, that would be awesome.
Ofcourse!
At exactly 3:53 in the video one sees the innovation. The electricity generator on current engines is powered by a PTO shaft. On this engine, power generation is embedded within the engine.
A Multirole fighter needs to be developed alongside Tempest that is catapult capable and to keep development and maintenance costs down it would share a lot of parts with Tempest
Shh! Don't say that or the program will be bogged down for another ten years.
@@rosewhite--- Just because it would share a lot of parts with Tempest it would not be the same programme as Tempest
@@jammiedodger7040 Our carriers have jump ramps not catapults
I'm guessing they will have some insane thrust vector capabilities to help with take off like we have with our F35Bs
@@bigstevie1690 Queen Elizabeth class is designed to have catapults installed and the space for the catapults is still under the deck and as the multirole fighter jet would not enter service till 2035. So the idea would be to do the Aircraft carriers mid refits earlier.The multirole fighter jet would not be VSTOL but it would be possible to make a sub variant that uses a similar system to what the harrier used as the multirole fighter jet would be a twin engine fighter jet so if a VSTOL sub variant was designed and developed it would be the first twin engine VSTOL fighter jet and it would also be the first 6th generation VSTOL.Also the Multirole Fighter Jet would not really compete with the F-35 because of it being twin engine and 6th generation and one big major difference is the Multirole fighter jet would have one variant for carrier operations (Catapult) and for land operations similar to the F-18 and F-14 but obviously the VSTOL would have to be a separate variant but the aim would be for both variants to be as similar as possible when it comes to parts so it is like operating one variant Multirole Fighter Jet, Multirole Fighter Jet VSTOL and Tempers but obviously Tempest would be a completely different airframe but would share a lot of parts with the Multirole Fighter Jet for commonality.
I agree that makes sense. The Royal Navy is clearly being expanded and built up in power. If they just build it as a navalised aircraft the RAF can share it with the Royal Navy just like it could with the f35c or f18 Superhornet if they had bought those instead of the f35b.
It looks too smooth to be real
How can this warplane amaze scientists? It doesn't even exist yet.
Well information. Good show.
Beautiful
Bet it goes really fast and that.
Tempest can also be pilotless and able to act as a team unit
As it said multiple times in the video genius.
Why aren't we working together on aircraft for different forces like naval and Air force you need to make it fly further than ever before
We need to put more urgency into this project. We need these within the next few years ready to defend our airspace.
Amazing plane
Looks absolutely Stunning.
They say its nuclear powered can fly for years without landing and is protected by drones is all this true .😊😊
And it goes just as fast backwards as it goes forwards.
But does it have a cup holder?
Yup but does it have Slime capabilities ?
I wonder if DON’T you have a photograph of Tempest on the thumbnail there are lots of photos, we even have mock up photographs as well
B.A.E. Systems not BAE ("bay") systems. It's an acronym of 'British Aerospace'. But 'British Airways' already use 'BA' so the 'e' was added.
Spot on. We can always steal a march on USA.
It's computer generated, mate. They've someway to go.
Yeah bro it’s an ai it just reads out whatever text you give it
Cool CG.
Yes, unfortunately it is not possible to capture real images of a plane that does not yet fly, so CG is the only way to
Now that's what I have been talking about. That thing is more compressor than high volume raptor engine and acts like a rocket engine from what I just saw on the videos.
NICE ONE UK ❤
They should scrap the tempest name and rename it the Spitfire
do we really need a cockpit canopy of glass. Could save a lot of weight and put the piolet in his optimum position
It's lightweight plexiglass, not glass
Amazing how these prototypes have the same build as the F22 Raptor, which goes to show how advanced and years ahead of the times the Raptor was in its design.
The Tempest mock up is kinda fugly tbh. As for it's resemblance to F22, stealth bring about certain design contraints, even so I think it looks closer to YF23, plus both the wing and cockpit are quite different but I see what you mean.
@@RpattoYT stealth! Your tanks use Chobham armour that’s British so don’t get insulting also the F35B is British technology from Jet powered VTOL & thrust vectoring also came from here as well because Rolls Royce made the Flying Bedstead in the 1950’s during the production of VTOL which gave Russia the idea of using it on their afterburners 24 hours not just 6 o’clock to 12
I don't think it looks nothing alike
@@RpattoYT yeah but the United States built the f22 in the 1980s
@@jamesgates6134 same build as in, nothing new. 20 years later, I’m thinking X-wing fighter kinda shit. Well, maybe not the X-wing as that is the worst aerodynamic design ever lol.
Very nice .build it in the UK and more Money for our Armed Forces 🇬🇧
How much does it cost??
You can tell these engineers grew up watching 80s dystopian syfi 😂
Lol the 6th generation fighters are looking more and more like the 80s movie firefox.
Soon it will be kids sitting at home on their Nintendo's operating those Jets into real life combat.
00:16 This is KF-21 #1 plane
I reckon the next working title for a next gen fighter
would be Maelstrom, France got the squall (rafale).
Old hat..
@@ENGBriseB You have no idea, human.
So your saying the Eurofighter was a 5th generation jet?? I dont think so...How does one jump from 4th to 6th? I'm open to explanation. Maybe I dont know anything.....
Nope, eurofighter was indeed a 4th generation jet, while it is typically unclear what makes a plane different generations, 5th gen normally means it has stealth capabilities. Countries do not need to go through all the generations, and could buy or make a jet of any generation. The UK has also purchased a small number of F-35s, which are 5th gen however as I said you don’t need to go through generations in order.
Is their version of the B21 Raider since it can also be with no pilot?
No because the raider is a bomber. This is a fighter
What I got from this was.... how vast the US miltary budget truly is. What we spend more than the next 9 countries combined. R&D and having the funds to pay for most of your problems to be solved. Really puts the US "Known" Defence budget into better perspective.
A vast military budget isn't something to be proud of... every dollar comes from somewhere or could be used to improve life for citizens. Millions homeless, crumbling infrastructure, sliding down the ladder of healthcare... but hey at least there's a bomber costing a billion and they've ordered twenty! 😂
It also is a massive help in overspend and the threat of ‘going broke’ The USA , if called upon , cannot pay its debts ! Mind you it is not alone in this - far from it . But there is a potential threat to its ‘reserve currency’ status . And that would hurt.
With Government in the loop it’s likely to end up a very expensive jet powered bi-plane.
The Uk gov will cancel it as soon as the first one is tested if it is too good.like the tsr2.
@@adriangarry659 Too true. We also cancelled the supersonic P.1154 Harrier to save money. Typically, its replacement the Phantom F4 ended up costing much more.
They're not the only players, like in the 60s. So they won't be able to cancel; back out, yes but not cancel.
If Starmer and Labour get in it will probably be cancelled.
@@EddieBeaumontThomas Nobody has yet found out who gave the order to cancel it and ordered its destruction.
Looks kinda like the yf -23.
Nice work I love it
You no it’s about time the poms pulled their fingers out and got on with it 👀👀👀
I really do wish the UK was still planning to develop the Tempest 6th gen jet fighter on its own. It really feels like our lack of diversity in looking for other providers to manufacture and develop it doing outside the box searching is what has resulted in us now planning to developing it with Italy and Japan.
That cover was Clickbait as hell. I need it even before actually clicking on it, because we all bloody well know what the actual Tempest aircraft is most likely going to look like. These TH-cam Clickbait are just getting ridiculous, and we all know it. Why do TH-cam video releases continue to do this when they know that viewers aren’t that dumb.
It looks like f 22 uk is behind technology
Partnering with Italy and Japan isn’t because of “lack of diversity,” working with other countries allows you to pool in your money together and do projects bigger than what those individual countries could pull off.
6:08 türkish 🇹🇷 ?
In the world of technology, over a decade from startup to production means this plane will be outdated before the first one takes flight.
Is there something going on by moving away from the US weapon platforms?
No, the UK has always had a domestic military aviation industry. Rolls Royce and BAE even had significant work-share in the F-35 programme
Ha un Designe magnifico .. c
its amde of plastic or wood' like toe rolls royvce??
I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised if copies of the Tempest blueprints aren't already in the Kremlin.
You mean, stolen by Comrade Mitchell Gantski?
Odd comment, what makes you say that?
Like Concordski you mean 😂 that went well.
It's Beijing that everyone's concerned with, nobody gives two shits about that barking three legged dog Russia
Think the Kremlin has its hands full with the Ukraine, they should stick to what they’re good at…..corruption and queuing for potatoes
Looks like the F23 has new life, even if it's being called tempest now
Thought we were going green ?
😂. Not while those Russians are throwing bombs around
Do your solar panels protect you from a tu-160 blackjack?
There will be a hybrid version too 😜😜👍🏻🇬🇧
We are, every time we destroy a target with the tempest, the RAF has promised to plant a tree
Atlantis next 💪🏻🇬🇧
6:08 türkish 🇹🇷 logo ?
who exactly is the THREAT please?
Being prepared with a plane before a threat emerges is better than scrambling to make one when one does
YES BABY, THIS IS THE ONE.13
💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜π
YF 23 its it???
Nope! YF-23 was an American project and is now scrapped.
I see a lot of Americans that cannot handle the fact that other nations can also make a plane. Time to grow up.
it looks cool but the wing is so large that its possible to get hit and lose control easily . "but only if it gets hit" i hope its so super nova krazy that it will nova stryke alll targets and threats before anyone can take a aim at it.
Can we all assume you are only 10 years old?
@@Tinker1950 you must be 5 brother . grow some we'll talk.
I see I was correct then.
@@Tinker1950 here let me teach you something, stop wasting your time and move on. Your mom was correct about you too for you to get a life.
You know what the UK should do ?
I think it should increase its military budget for a decade from 54 billion dollars to 100 and during that decade improve all it's military capabilities especially defensive capabilities
Problem is over ten years away Uk has a problem with bringing cutting edge technology to the forefront before its middle of the road. If push came to shove this could be flying in 9months but here we are
This video is full of jargon which most ordinary people like me ,just don’t understand.
Ok!
Definitely looks like the US black widow, yf-23
Brother of Rimuru tempest ✨
I'll believe it when I see it in squadron use.
Hope the government of UK do not cancel it
Maybe you people can pay for it then.
Anyway the antigravitational which exists already IS the aircraft of another dimension....
An American general has said " if the tempest is only half the aircraft they claim ...American would be foolish not to but some
UK putting everything but the kitchen sink in to this
Direct energy weapon was in the tv show bionic woman.
I have seen a wind tunnel model with this same type of shape at the Farnborough Air Sciences Trust museum, it was claimed to be cancelled in favour of the F35, can some one confirm or disprove this for me, (this model is from some decades ago).
Tempest looking more like the F-23 Grey Ghost's shape in this video.🤔
some animations belong to Turkish TFX fighter plane.
TR3B…….Have a nice day.
UK ITALY JAPAN WOW
Ok but where is Skylon ???
Gone. Long gone.
The boat left a long time ago
2035? Better put some floats on it!
What the tempest is sub-sonic either super-sonic fighter jets ? What's the capacity to load arms and per kms speed thrust ? What kind of radar avonic s technology has added in its ? Is it true that the tempest is 6th generation fighter jets ? When or which year the tempest will be activated. ? When the world people's will see it ?
Might want to work on your grammar a bit. 99% of fighters nowadays are supersonic so I assume the tempest will be to, it will (hopefully) start to be introduced in 2035 and we still don’t know too much as it’s a while off and BAE have said the plane could accommodate new technologies that haven’t even been invented yet
British Aircraft names are THE best
Why the hell can’t we build a plane in this country without letting half the world in on it.
It’s coz of this little thing called money. Pooling money together from multiple countries allows for one big research program so all countries involved get a highly capable plane.
I like how it says BAE a uk based company lol its one of the largest if not the largest defense companies in the world
British Aerospace Systems
I don't think scientists are amazed about a plane yet to be built.
To me, the frame looks to be out of date, i mean why just copy old when you should be designing new & futuristic, check out the US's NGAD programme, i think tempest are missing a trick.
This is basically a copy of the unclassified discussions coming from ngad
6:08 türkish logo 🇹🇷
A jet engine can be made even more powerful without resorting to going over the thermal barrier of the high pressure turbines by simply ionising the efflux and accelerating it with a specially designed high voltage anode. This will increase the speed of the efflux without having to carry coolant or other additives.
Also, by modulating the anode the efflux jet can also mask the infra red give away signature so making it difficult to lock on with heat seekers etc.
Well duh
@@Billy.Nomates
Heat or thermal energy can be neutralised simply by countering the frequency with certain harmonics.
Wow, that sounds simple. Did the Chinese invent this? They claim to invent everything these days, including the ball point pen. I can't imagine what i was using in school though.
@@Fleshox19-uz3qt
Nope, I devised it myself but I'm allowing anyone to use and improve it. Atoms and molecules can so easily be ionised when in hot flux.
I believe an electric field can be made to cause a status much better than a magnetic field even though the one cannot be without the other.
There are at least 4 different wing shapes,3 different tail fin/ruttervators combo's (over 2000 hours in different versions of the F-15 and you wouldn't demo a secret jet to the public with an open cockpit and roll up stairs for the world to see
They should build the first hundred for TAIWAN 🇹🇼
Here's hoping that the the tech on the plane is better than the AI on the voice-over for this clip, or we're all stuffed..
Hope it doesn’t fall victim of politics, like the TSR 2 in the 60’s.
Looks like a cross between an f22 and f23
Will it fly to the edge of space? To guard against satellite killer, incoming missiles and destroying enemies satellite
Be best jet ever
B - A - E Systems, not Bay Systems. individual letters pronounced separately
Hey mate! Just noticed how you are critiquing an AI voice’s pronunciation, these AI bots simply read out text and don’t care too much about pronunciation
So they gonna make the f23
Nicee
Looks good,i used to work at Rolls Royce quite a number of years...now in retired in Thailand,maybe the goverment can put some money into the pensions of retirees abroad who dont get the increases,id also like the comany building the plane to work with Mercedes F1 team to iron out its problems,we do have 2 Brit drivers,
verya amzing looks a copy of a russian fighter Su with two jet engines, :))
Which one?
Lets face it, nobody is going to sell the UK a 6th gen fighter but £250 million and 5 years to design and develop a demonstrator is a bit of a stretch.