Hi there, everyone! It looks like it was the most elaborate video we've made recently. Want to see continuation? If you are a fan of our videos, feel free to support our project here: ➥ Support us on TH-cam - www.youtube.com/@kosmo_off/join ➥ Support us on Patreon - www.patreon.com/kosmo_off
As mentioned by others, NO star close to Sun is heavy enough to go Supernova...Heavy is the important word here...only candidate might be Sirius B (for Supernova 1A type), which is White dwarf in binary system with Sirius A, but yet again, he is far away from 1.4 masses of the Sun Chandrasekhar limit for such event...so yeah, we are just fine, speaking about nearby stars
Thank you again Kosmo and team, your animations are fantastic and the perfect narrative to match, perhaps in your next video you could explain how astronomers measure the heat of Stars, I find it fascinating how such distance objects can be measured with great accuracy.
THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!! By Frank DiMeglio
WHY AND HOW EINSTEIN WENT WRONG REGARDING WHAT IS BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA: E=MC2 IS F=ma. Get a good look at the BLUE SKY. The Earth is ALSO BLUE. Get a good look at what is THE EYE !!! Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Balanced BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is the reason that objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!!!!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!!!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!!!!!!!!!! TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! Consider what is the speed of light (c). Great !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Carefully consider what is THE SUN. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Great. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Now, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is the speed of light (c) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/as E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great !!!! SO, it all CLEARLY makes perfect sense; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. SO, I have CLEARLY explained why objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma !!!! By Frank DiMeglio
@@dickdeoreo WHY AND HOW EINSTEIN WENT WRONG REGARDING WHAT IS BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA: E=MC2 IS F=ma. Get a good look at the BLUE SKY. The Earth is ALSO BLUE. Get a good look at what is THE EYE !!! Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Balanced BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is the reason that objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!!!!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!!!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!!!!!!!!!! TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! Consider what is the speed of light (c). Great !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Carefully consider what is THE SUN. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Great. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Now, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is the speed of light (c) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/as E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great !!!! SO, it all CLEARLY makes perfect sense; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. SO, I have CLEARLY explained why objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma !!!! By Frank DiMeglio
UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio
Your productions just keep getting better and better. I like the fact that you have specific animation for your videos, and not a not a lot of stock photos or video. Well done👍
A fuckin fantastic...pixel of light. But with the right optics...they can probably see the most advanced modern nation nuke and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people (:
@@NathanUpliftpk I'm LOL-ing about how you tried to correct the way someone wrote their comment (when there was nothing all that wrong with it, really) and managed to mess your own grammar up so bad. Karma sucks, huh? 😂
As I recall, there are only a few dozen ‘earthish’ planets in the habitable zone out of a few thousand exoplanets discovered. It is possible, though, and even likely, that there could be giant earth sized moons around some of the Jupiter sized exoplanets that we cannot detect.
I think that's likely to be true. We have seen a disproportionately large set of Jupiter like planets. Jupiter and Saturn both have large and diverse retinues of moons so it is reasonable to infer that there will be earth sized moons around some of the larger specimens.
@@76rjackson What, around planets the size of Jupiter or Saturn? Absolutely not! The largest moon in our solar system, Ganymede, is 3, 273.38 miles across. Earth and Venus are more than _double_ that size! Let's just say such a body would be in the range of seven to eight thousand miles in diameter. Something that size would _tear apart_ something like Jupiter or Saturn! 💥
However, I for one, have no doubt there are "Earthish" sized moons somewhere. But they would have to be orbiting planets that are so much bigger than our large gas giants, that I doubt they could not be in the same classification! BTW, a bit of trivia; The Earth is the largest _solid_ object in our solar system. If you combined Mercury, Venus and Mars, they would still equal only about 99% the size of the Earth. 🌎 = 😀👍
It is doubtful that Arcturus has enough mass to go supernova. Arcturus' mass is slightly greater than the Sun's. A supernova requires at least eight solar masses.
@@chadh0nkleton774 Very different events. A “regular” nova happens in a binary system where one star is a white dwarf. The dwarf accumulates gas from the larger star and a thermonuclear explosion occurs on its surface. Both stars survive and it can happen cyclically.
Just curious, but don’t any of these other stars have Oort Clouds? Shouldn’t there be a much more dynamic exchange of material between stars? Perhaps that is what Omuamua(sp) was…just an object from another Oort Cloud…
Oort clouds at that distance won't be visible to us. Shit, we barley can detect shit in our own Oort cloud. Detecting planets around the stars is insanely hard, its like spotting a fly in-front of a haystack 30 miles away.
Sci-fi makes things like nebulae and asteroid belts seem incredibly dense for dramatic purposes, but in reality such things are incredibly diffuse and you'd find it very difficult to know you're in one
@@limiv5272 I recall watching a video (probably by Anton Petrov) about a paper that proposes our solar system is in some sort of nebula. It is incredibly hard to detect if we are, or not.
If there are, detecting them would probably be extremely difficult, because Oort Cloud material is probably as cold as the interstellar medium itself, reflects virtually no light at the distance it is from the Sun, our parent star, and does not have enough mass in it to exert any detectable wobble on the Sun as would be observable on our equipment parsecs away from it.
So, I imagine detection might be remotely possible, if it emits any observable radio wavelengths from electrostatic or electromagnetic activity from any physical processes going on in celestial bodies orbiting those distances around their stars. Not likely to be much of that, either, but I think it's a long shot possibility.
15:54 Why would you think Arcturus would go supernova? Depending on what sort of supernova your are supposing, Arcturus at 1.5 solar masses, doesn't seem to have the bulk to have such a specular end. Most predictions I have read suggest once Arcturus exhausts its helium supply, its outer layers will likely bleed off, leaving behind a white dwarf remnant surrounded by a planetary nebula.
Cody's lab did a great video on a scale model of the solar system, they scaled the Sun down to a pea, and I believe they still had to go over 100km away for Proxima.
Another perspective. If the Sun was scaled down to a basketball the distance between it and Proxima Centauri would be the equivalent of Perth, Western Australia to a bit beyond Wuhan in China.
3:12 your statement is incorrect. Proxima is moving closer to us as well, and within 25k years will be around 3.1 LY away. At that point each of the stars in the trinary system will be taking turns being our closest neighbor for a while. The orbit of Ross 128 around the Milky Way is calculated to bring it no closer than around 6.2 LY, which is still further away than any of the Alpha Centauri stars are currently.
I think you confused Nova with Supernova when referring to Arcturus (@15:48). It has no where near enough mass for that to go supernova. It will just off gas in a standard nova.
Red Giants like Arcturus don't go supernova to form a white dwarf. A supernova is an implosion caused by core collapse when the star fuses elements into iron. Once that happens, the fusion stops and the outward fusion pressure no longer supports the stars mass against its own gravity. The mass collapses in on itself, and rebounds off the iron core in an explosion. The pressure creates either a neutron star or a black hole. In contrast, a red giant doesn't t have the mass needed to fuse heavier elements, so once it's hydrogen fuel is depleted and begins fusing helium, it swells up into a red dwarf, and starts to "sputter" like an engine running out of fuel. Gradually the outer layers are thrown off in the pulses and what's left behind is a planetary nebula and a white dwarf star, which was the core of the red giant.
A red dwarf star are M-class stars, I know you said red giant in there too, but red dwarfs are the smallest stars that can burn for a very long time. 🙂
You mentioned in this video that Fomalhaut and Arcturus will go supernova someday. But my understanding of such dictates that, larger than our sun though they are, both stars are far too small to go supernova. In fact, every star in the stellar neighborhood you have discussed is far below the size threshold for going supernova; including Sirius, Altair, and Vega.
@@ivobrick7401 No. A supernova forms neutron stars or Black holes. Wds are formed from after the star swells into a giant phase like the sun eventually will (or Arcturus has now) and then collapse spectacularly but without the violence of a supernova. The closest star to us that is likely to go supernova is IK Pegasi B, and that's a whopping 150 light years from us. Which suits me just fine!!! :-)
Yeah exactly. Such stars just slightly massive than our Sun wil go release their material in the form of planetary nebulae after their red giant phases have ended.
Going this far out into space would be anxiety yet amazing. We would have so much stuff to take in I wonder however if we could take pictures with cameras or something if we got to see this stuff up close out of the ships windows
Well ya but still we would be able to maybe see something and that would be cool if cardinal directions worked in space instead of coordinates and what not
All completely unsuitable. Red dwarves have enormous mass ejections that would fry anything on a planet in the goldilocks zone. Very few stars are stable in their emmisions. Small G type stars like the sun are fairly rare but they are stable enough to not endanger life very often.
RED DWARFS? IT'S COLD OUTSIDE, THERE'S NO KIND OF ATMOSPHERE WE'RE ALL ALONE, MORE OR LESS LET ME FLY FAR AWAY FROM HERE FUN, FUN, FUN, IN THE SUN, SUN, SUN
With a mass barely more than that of the Sun, Arcturus will never go supernova. Objects up to almost 8 times more massive than the Sun will always go out with a whimper. Objects more than 8 times more massive than the Sun however. Well, boom.
Odd how they say a planet is an "earth like planet" just by seeing it's blip of shadow going in the front of it's sun many light years away. It's absolutely a guess from those distances.
HOW!!! how can you only have 200k subs your quality of the videos are SOOOO good what i hope you get more reqognition in the future :D love the content cant wait for more
Around 8mins in, you mention Altair's rotational speed and the outer edge traveling at 286,000 kps.... 95% the speed of light? Seems like that would have a pretty dramatic effect.... since the gasses are moving so quickly, do they experience time differently, and would therefore last much much longer than an equivalent star that is not rotating so quickly?
@@rickpontificates3406 soon I hear that they might extend human lifetime with robots and machines. I don't know where I just remember hearing it but as the days go on the lifetime grows larger and larger, so keep your hopes up
What kind of gravity on Ross 128-B? Being 30% larger i assume it would be tough to even stand or have the strength to walk? Complex life at best would be jellyfish or squid-like creatures with those kinds of pressures
Not exactly accurate. See, you are trying to equate our prespective of the pressure of evolution to other planets. The beauty of evolution is that organisms adapt to the enviroment rather than the other way around. They can have giant creatures or microbes for all we know who can adapt to the pressures.
So looking at our Oort Cloud and looking at house close the nearest star is. It theoretically might also have an Oort Cloud and they might be touching right?
There's something creepy about attempting to wanna explore other planets.. it's like traveling randomly in the middle of the ocean in hope u find land. Just being in the thicc of it all makes you feel very exposed and intimidated by it all.. who knows what these planets hide.
And then there are people like me. If I were possible I’d jump at the chance to explore new planets. I kinda feel like I was born at the wrong time. Too late to explore the Earth, but too early to explore space. So I’m relegated to just looking up and wondering what future generations will get to see.
If Ross 128 is a Red Dwarf, then wasn't it once a normal star? If so, then wouldn't Ross 128B have once orbited Ross 128 at a distance closer than Mercury is to our sun? If so, then Ross 128B would seem to not have the building blocks of life since the planet was once baked like our planet Mercury.
I wonder, if we weren't in a rather sparse region of our galaxy, that in turn is on the edge of a supercluster, that in turn is looking out across a supervoid... would we be able to see even a fraction of the stuff we see? I mean, the light pollution from being in a dense region of a dense region within a dense region would limit our deep-space views, no?
From what I understand, our Earth lies two thirds out on our arm of the Milky Way galaxy. I’m under the impression that our region is indeed “rather sparse”, relatively speaking. If we were closer, such as half way from the center of our galaxy, I wonder if we would find ourselves in the middle of a much denser area in terms of the number of stars that exist near to us, filling our night sky with luminosity. Perhaps because more stars would be closer, we might even see more of their colors directly, and perhaps more easily see nebulous objects also.
I saw a diff channel claim our galaxy supercluster does in fact reside in the largest supervoid in the observable Universe, yet I hear from other vids thaf Bootes Void is the biggest. I don’t know if they mean Bootes is the largest relative from OUR perspective or what, the two ideas both being correct confuse me. Maybe somebody knowledge on this will comment and cle
15:50 the result of a supernova is a neutron star or a black hole. White dwarves are the remnants of red giants after the outer shells are ejected into space.
The fact that we learn about objects that are light years away from us and no one has EVER physically seen but deemed as true is kinda funny when you think about it
? 'no one has ever physically seen' ? well what the fcuk was it in the telescope if not the actual planet, star etc? what? a smudge on the mirror/lens? what?
You know, you COULD'VE googled this. We can know A LOT about these objects in several ways. First is through the science of spectroscopy. By examining the emitted light, we can know the chemical composition & what its made of. All elements produce unique spectral lines in their emission spectra... Its like the element's unique "light fingerprints." So by examining the light and breaking it down into its spectrum, we can know exactly what its made of. Also, we can know things like the object's mass & size by its orbital period, etc. We can know how far the objects are from us through a bunch of ways. For example, through trigonometric parallax (which is basically the same method that surveyors use in construction). Google is your friend. Use it.
There may be bacterial life everywhere, as it is very hardy; but advanced life (and intelligent life) requires billions of years of stable environments. The star can’t throw X-ray or gamma ray flares. It is helpful if the planet has a large satellite (such as our moon), but ours arouse from a very unlikely collusion between us and a mars sized planet - and not a direct hit either. It was an oblique hit that tore off enough material for the moon. Even then, advanced life may not flourish, as there were several times during our history that life was nearly extinguished (such as the “snowball earth” event). There may indeed be other intelligent life out there, but it would be prudent to be skeptical until it is truly found. Science fiction movies have conditioned us to think that intelligent life is plentiful, but science requires proof, not fantasy.
Oh I don’t know. With millions of stars in our galaxy, most with planets around them, and then there being millions of galaxies the sheer numbers would seem to favour life occurring somewhere else. Alas with distances being so long it’ll be a long time before we meet any, provided both species do eventually figure out FTL.
Do most stars have planets around them are or they mostly without planets? And are most of the planets that surround stars rocky or gaseous (gas giants)? Would it make much sense to try and reach the nearest stars to our own solar system if they are unlikely to have planetary bodies orbiting them (making up a solar system) with at least one of those bodies having Earth‐like characteristics?
I like how one of the exoplanets is called Ross 128b. I know one of the moons of Saturn is called Phoebe. Are there other astral bodies called Monica, Chandler, Joey and Rachel? Seems like Ross and Phoebe could do with the rest of their friends! Wonderful video, so fascinating and educational.
I prefer the more Romanesque/Ancient Greek names. Jupiter, Enceladus,Titania etc. How about a moon/exoplanet named Sagan or a black hole after Einstein? How about just Stein? Sounds better than a whole solar system named Gliese or Kepler and a number besides it. Very unoriginal. Sagan, Einstein, Clerk Maxwell,Tesla and others deserve it. Lastly, keep the star Boyajian instead of KIC whatever. Boyajian sounds much more alien and exotic!👽💫✨🪐🚀😉
Anyone else concerned at 11:18 about Fomalhaut-A going super-nova only 25 light-years away? That's just on the border of the supernova safety zone. I'm gonna be freaking out in a billion years.
Really enjoy your vids Kosmo! Just one suggestion- you shouldn't say e.g. "3 times as small" or "5 times lighter". We know what you mean to say but it makes no logical sense and therefore is logically meaningless. e.g. what does "1 time smaller" or "1 time lighter" mean? - it's meaningless. Far better to say "one third the mass" or "one fifth the size",both of which make sense. Keep up the good work! :-) .
Thank you! I thought I was the only one who found that weird. It's not just here - that usage seems to be in most of Kosmos's videos. Multiplying something usually makes it bigger, not smaller! Visually stunning though - I'm a happy subscriber - it's just that the script could do with a little tweaking.
Lol this reminds me of Earth Space Dock in Star Trek Online. Pretty much every player is there because they like some form of ST, but 80% of the time the zone chat was clogged with people blabbering about US politics. Not all was lost though. When Leonard Nimoy, the actor who played the original Spock died I decided to fly to Vulcan to remember him in my own way. After beaming down to the surface I was surprised to find that I wasn’t alone. Hundreds of others had done the same thing, packing several instances of the zone. The Devs must have noticed our impromptu gathering because they put a memorial in the place we gathered. So yeah humans can be both smart and stupid.
Fascinating, especially that last star Alturus I think it was named, watch it devour that planet, can't help but think that will be earth some day in the future, and with all the white dwarf stars, you got to wonder how many planets were annihilated along with their inhabitants like us eh, well done video, thanks, and keep them coming 😎🖖
Its sad to say but i don't think we will ever be able to travel beyond the stars the distances involved are just to vast, it takes light itself that long to travel that its like looking back in time observing most stars, humans will need to leave the earth one day but i feel we will have nowhere to go.
I think you should look at Miguel Alcubierre's work, NASA has been working on a workable space drive to send ships close to light speed with time dilation due to Relativity the stars may not be as far as they seem...All we have to do is stop squabling among ourselves and do it.
some of the most interesting objects in the universe are millions and billions of light years away..sad that we cannot yet travel to places that are even just one light year away, and man may never be able to..even in the future
![เปิดใจ “ต้นหอม ศกุนตลา” หลังโดนพาดพิงธุรกิจที่เคยทำ และผลกระทบทำถูกปลดฟ้าผ่า! | แฉ 24 ต.ค.67 [2/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vCi5OIqlxaE/mqdefault.jpg)
Hi there, everyone! It looks like it was the most elaborate video we've made recently. Want to see continuation?
If you are a fan of our videos, feel free to support our project here:
➥ Support us on TH-cam - www.youtube.com/@kosmo_off/join
➥ Support us on Patreon - www.patreon.com/kosmo_off
Yes
Yeah! It's awesome
Most Definitely 👌
Yes, please and thank you.
Yes,for sure plz
This was so well done. The 3 star systems was spectacular.
Were not was.
Agreed cool video
I disagree Tau Ceti star system was left out , .....unexcuseable .
Staring Samuel l jackson SNALES IN SPACE
@@donaldmichaellumsden2714 INR
@Jesus is LORD ?
As mentioned by others, NO star close to Sun is heavy enough to go Supernova...Heavy is the important word here...only candidate might be Sirius B (for Supernova 1A type), which is White dwarf in binary system with Sirius A, but yet again, he is far away from 1.4 masses of the Sun Chandrasekhar limit for such event...so yeah, we are just fine, speaking about nearby stars
exactly. Arcturus does not have enough mass to go Supernova. It will probably go nova, like our star. Still bad news for any planets in a close orbit.
What about Beautleguese
@@davidroche8627 that is not close to us.
@@tvs5941
Over 600 LY away?
@@andylane247 correct, so a supernova is no concern to us. We could just enjoy the view
I'd LOVE to see more videos just like this one. I'm fascinated by our local group of stars. I'd love to see a continuation of or nearest stars.
Thank you again Kosmo and team, your animations are fantastic and the perfect narrative to match, perhaps in your next video you could explain how astronomers measure the heat of Stars, I find it fascinating how such distance objects can be measured with great accuracy.
Spectroscopy maybe?
THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!!
By Frank DiMeglio
WHY AND HOW EINSTEIN WENT WRONG REGARDING WHAT IS BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA:
E=MC2 IS F=ma. Get a good look at the BLUE SKY. The Earth is ALSO BLUE. Get a good look at what is THE EYE !!! Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Balanced BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is the reason that objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!!!!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!!!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!!!!!!!!!!
TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! Consider what is the speed of light (c). Great !!!
E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Carefully consider what is THE SUN. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Great. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Now, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is the speed of light (c) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/as E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great !!!! SO, it all CLEARLY makes perfect sense; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. SO, I have CLEARLY explained why objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma !!!!
By Frank DiMeglio
@@dickdeoreo WHY AND HOW EINSTEIN WENT WRONG REGARDING WHAT IS BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA:
E=MC2 IS F=ma. Get a good look at the BLUE SKY. The Earth is ALSO BLUE. Get a good look at what is THE EYE !!! Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Balanced BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is the reason that objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!!!!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!!!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!!!!!!!!!!
TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! Consider what is the speed of light (c). Great !!!
E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Carefully consider what is THE SUN. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Great. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Now, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is the speed of light (c) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/as E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great !!!! SO, it all CLEARLY makes perfect sense; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. SO, I have CLEARLY explained why objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma !!!!
By Frank DiMeglio
UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma:
The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!!
TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
Your productions just keep getting better and better. I like the fact that you have specific animation for your videos, and not a not a lot of stock photos or video. Well done👍
No photos here only CGI nonsense
Another great video by Kosmo. Looking forward for more discoveries of Ross 128B.
How could we not want more? Thanks for all of the great content and knowledge!
"There are snakes in Space!??!"
"Literally EVERYTHING is in space."
Snake Jazz!
@@brothermanbill7338 psss tssss tsss tsss pssss tssss tssss
Space: I’m a thneeky thnaaake
Snake Hitler!
Is this a Rick & Morty reference?
Special thanks to the cameraman for traveling many light years to record our neighboring stars.
Ahhahah, good one, bro!)))
#respect 😄
You know it's cgi right? I'm just 14, but even I know that :/
@@adrianlarsen2045 Wdym? Everybody knows that the cameraman never dies.
@Dr. Strange you don’t say
How would our solar System Look like in the Sky from a different solar System on a different earth?
and how would our galaxy look to an observer in one of the magellanic clouds?
And how would our universe look from the multiverse?
@Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington yep
A fuckin fantastic...pixel of light. But with the right optics...they can probably see the most advanced modern nation nuke and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people (:
@@NathanUpliftpk I'm LOL-ing about how you tried to correct the way someone wrote their comment (when there was nothing all that wrong with it, really) and managed to mess your own grammar up so bad. Karma sucks, huh? 😂
As I recall, there are only a few dozen ‘earthish’ planets in the habitable zone out of a few thousand exoplanets discovered. It is possible, though, and even likely, that there could be giant earth sized moons around some of the Jupiter sized exoplanets that we cannot detect.
I would be skeptical of that.
We cannot detect objects as small as "Earth sized" planets very well.
I think that's likely to be true. We have seen a disproportionately large set of Jupiter like planets. Jupiter and Saturn both have large and diverse retinues of moons so it is reasonable to infer that there will be earth sized moons around some of the larger specimens.
@@76rjackson What, around planets the size of Jupiter or Saturn? Absolutely not!
The largest moon in our solar system, Ganymede, is 3, 273.38 miles across. Earth and Venus are more than _double_ that size!
Let's just say such a body would be in the range of seven to eight thousand miles in diameter.
Something that size would _tear apart_ something like Jupiter or Saturn! 💥
However, I for one, have no doubt there are "Earthish" sized moons somewhere.
But they would have to be orbiting planets that are so much bigger than our large gas giants, that I doubt they could not be in the same classification!
BTW, a bit of trivia;
The Earth is the largest _solid_ object in our solar system. If you combined Mercury, Venus and Mars, they would still equal only about 99% the size of the Earth.
🌎 = 😀👍
@@TheNoiseySpectator why not? There's no rule that dictates an upper limit to the size of a moon vis a vis its planet. Your assertion is baseless.
It is doubtful that Arcturus has enough mass to go supernova. Arcturus' mass is slightly greater than the Sun's. A supernova requires at least eight solar masses.
Could just go nova, given it’s smaller size
@@chadh0nkleton774 Very different events. A “regular” nova happens in a binary system where one star is a white dwarf. The dwarf accumulates gas from the larger star and a thermonuclear explosion occurs on its surface. Both stars survive and it can happen cyclically.
The pillars of life will no longer be seen in 1000 years as it’s an event that happened in the past. But the light is just reaching us.
@Fred Nurke "dear girl" I wonder if you know how you sound
Sure bud
You deserve your own well paid television program.
Fantastic video I’ve been wanting a video like this for a while please continue this series examining the closest systems to us
Just curious, but don’t any of these other stars have Oort Clouds? Shouldn’t there be a much more dynamic exchange of material between stars? Perhaps that is what Omuamua(sp) was…just an object from another Oort Cloud…
Oort clouds at that distance won't be visible to us. Shit, we barley can detect shit in our own Oort cloud. Detecting planets around the stars is insanely hard, its like spotting a fly in-front of a haystack 30 miles away.
Sci-fi makes things like nebulae and asteroid belts seem incredibly dense for dramatic purposes, but in reality such things are incredibly diffuse and you'd find it very difficult to know you're in one
@@limiv5272 I recall watching a video (probably by Anton Petrov) about a paper that proposes our solar system is in some sort of nebula. It is incredibly hard to detect if we are, or not.
If there are, detecting them would probably be extremely difficult, because Oort Cloud material is probably as cold as the interstellar medium itself, reflects virtually no light at the distance it is from the Sun, our parent star, and does not have enough mass in it to exert any detectable wobble on the Sun as would be observable on our equipment parsecs away from it.
So, I imagine detection might be remotely possible, if it emits any observable radio wavelengths from electrostatic or electromagnetic activity from any physical processes going on in celestial bodies orbiting those distances around their stars. Not likely to be much of that, either, but I think it's a long shot possibility.
Awesome content! I would like watch more videos like this.
Congratulations for the amazing work!
15:54 Why would you think Arcturus would go supernova? Depending on what sort of supernova your are supposing, Arcturus at 1.5 solar masses, doesn't seem to have the bulk to have such a specular end. Most predictions I have read suggest once Arcturus exhausts its helium supply, its outer layers will likely bleed off, leaving behind a white dwarf remnant surrounded by a planetary nebula.
Yeah that confused me because most of the time red giants similar in mass to our sun don't go supernova
I thought the same when he mentioned Fomalhaut's "fate".
@@ComaDave So did I. Fomalhaut's mass is about 1.92 times that of the Sun. A Type II supernova must have at least 8 times the mass of the sun.
The narrator did say that in due course, Arcturus will become a white dwarf and take billions of years to cool off.
@@GururajBN Yes, after a super nova. Skip the super nova and he has it correct.
I’ve learned so much! Thank you for doing this project 💚
How much of it can you remember 😁
If the sun was scaled down to the size of a basketball, the distance to Proxima Centauri would be like Denver to London.
Cody's lab did a great video on a scale model of the solar system, they scaled the Sun down to a pea, and I believe they still had to go over 100km away for Proxima.
Another perspective. If the Sun was scaled down to a basketball the distance between it and Proxima Centauri would be the equivalent of Perth, Western Australia to a bit beyond Wuhan in China.
No wonder stars dont collide
3:12 your statement is incorrect. Proxima is moving closer to us as well, and within 25k years will be around 3.1 LY away. At that point each of the stars in the trinary system will be taking turns being our closest neighbor for a while. The orbit of Ross 128 around the Milky Way is calculated to bring it no closer than around 6.2 LY, which is still further away than any of the Alpha Centauri stars are currently.
I think you confused Nova with Supernova when referring to Arcturus (@15:48). It has no where near enough mass for that to go supernova. It will just off gas in a standard nova.
Red Giants like Arcturus don't go supernova to form a white dwarf. A supernova is an implosion caused by core collapse when the star fuses elements into iron. Once that happens, the fusion stops and the outward fusion pressure no longer supports the stars mass against its own gravity. The mass collapses in on itself, and rebounds off the iron core in an explosion. The pressure creates either a neutron star or a black hole.
In contrast, a red giant doesn't t have the mass needed to fuse heavier elements, so once it's hydrogen fuel is depleted and begins fusing helium, it swells up into a red dwarf, and starts to "sputter" like an engine running out of fuel. Gradually the outer layers are thrown off in the pulses and what's left behind is a planetary nebula and a white dwarf star, which was the core of the red giant.
A red dwarf star are M-class stars, I know you said red giant in there too, but red dwarfs are the smallest stars that can burn for a very long time. 🙂
@@centauria9122 yes, Red Giants form planetary nebulae. Appreciate the correction (it was a typo)
This is interesting to see the details about some of the 57 navigational stars. In a periscope sextant they are just a bright dot. Thanks.
Woooow...im very fascinated by all this information. Thanks kosmo👍❤
You mentioned in this video that Fomalhaut and Arcturus will go supernova someday. But my understanding of such dictates that, larger than our sun though they are, both stars are far too small to go supernova. In fact, every star in the stellar neighborhood you have discussed is far below the size threshold for going supernova; including Sirius, Altair, and Vega.
There is WD in Sirius system, does not that mean there has been a supernova already?
@@ivobrick7401 No. A supernova forms neutron stars or Black holes. Wds are formed from after the star swells into a giant phase like the sun eventually will (or Arcturus has now) and then collapse spectacularly but without the violence of a supernova. The closest star to us that is likely to go supernova is IK Pegasi B, and that's a whopping 150 light years from us. Which suits me just fine!!! :-)
Yeah exactly. Such stars just slightly massive than our Sun wil go release their material in the form of planetary nebulae after their red giant phases have ended.
That's what I thought too! But my space knowledge is way too shallow to make a statement regarding this. But I'm glad someone pointed it out.
@@bradfordhatch5085 Doesn't a star have to be at least 10 times more massive than the sun before it will go supernova and form a Neutron star?
Hearing “Dagon” woke me up lol. Never heard anyone pronounce my name on TH-cam
Going this far out into space would be anxiety yet amazing. We would have so much stuff to take in I wonder however if we could take pictures with cameras or something if we got to see this stuff up close out of the ships windows
Most of space is emptyness
Well ya but still we would be able to maybe see something and that would be cool if cardinal directions worked in space instead of coordinates and what not
@@rad0947
What are cardinal directions
@@mth469 North South East West
@@rad0947
Ok. Learn something new everyday.
Prior to this I had only heard of Cardinal sin.
I used to have nightmares sometimes a year about space, when I was younger.😳
Its quite scary how asia is soooo big but they are basically a ant compared to the sun the size of a house
All completely unsuitable. Red dwarves have enormous mass ejections that would fry anything on a planet in the goldilocks zone. Very few stars are stable in their emmisions.
Small G type stars like the sun are fairly rare but they are stable enough to not endanger life very often.
In the case of Ross 128, as a red dwarf, it’s a lot less active than these other stars like Trappist-1 and Proxima Centauri.
@@randomguy4167 In 1978 it was classified as a flare star after a series of major mass ejections. So Ross 128 b might not be that comfortable!
This was amazing,the music at 16:22 is 🔥🔥🔥, nothing but love from Zambia🙏🙏🙏
i want a warp engine, and i want it, now.
Very cool....thanks ! Can't wait for "Big Jim" to zoom in on our neighborhood. Should be awesome.
RED DWARFS?
IT'S COLD OUTSIDE, THERE'S NO KIND OF ATMOSPHERE
WE'RE ALL ALONE, MORE OR LESS
LET ME FLY FAR AWAY FROM HERE
FUN, FUN, FUN, IN THE SUN, SUN, SUN
oh smeg off.. :")
@@mickhealy572 its facts
@@Azamat421 its dwarf.
Lol I read that and heard the theme song on my mind.
Great job. Very well done!
With a mass barely more than that of the Sun, Arcturus will never go supernova. Objects up to almost 8 times more massive than the Sun will always go out with a whimper. Objects more than 8 times more massive than the Sun however. Well, boom.
well done. hope you do all the stars w/in 50 light years!
Great video but one mistake, Arcturus will not go supernova it will become a white dwarf. Other than that Great job!
He even says white dwarf after saying supernova in the video, that threw me off haha
But yes otherwise great vid!
He said the same of Fomalhaut in this video; which at less than two solar masses is also too small to go supernova.
The visuals are just stunning!
Odd how they say a planet is an "earth like planet" just by seeing it's blip of shadow going in the front of it's sun many light years away. It's absolutely a guess from those distances.
Size, composition, atmosphere, temperature, radiation levels can all be measured using instruments on earth.
@@blazo8700 I wonder how accurate
making it one of the closest planetary systems to our solar system.
"My God, it's full of stars" cit.
HOW!!! how can you only have 200k subs your quality of the videos are SOOOO good what i hope you get more reqognition in the future :D love the content cant wait for more
The narrator’s voice is silky smooth.
As broken glass up yo a...
Computer generated voice. Very boring to listen to..
Superb video, thank you very much!
Around 8mins in, you mention Altair's rotational speed and the outer edge traveling at 286,000 kps.... 95% the speed of light? Seems like that would have a pretty dramatic effect.... since the gasses are moving so quickly, do they experience time differently, and would therefore last much much longer than an equivalent star that is not rotating so quickly?
He said 286Kmps 😁
.. beautiful broadcast about the stars
You have a great channel!
I wish I could travel to exoplanets, especially inhabited ones and see what’s out there
If you are young currently like between 20s and 30s, then i believe we will travel exoplanets in our lifetime. I am sure for myself at least. [DiowE]
@@DiowE I’m 56, so it may be too late for me to witness it. ☹️
@@rickpontificates3406 Please, Don't be sad. I hope you are fulfilling other dreams of yours. [DiowE]
@@rickpontificates3406 soon I hear that they might extend human lifetime with robots and machines. I don't know where I just remember hearing it but as the days go on the lifetime grows larger and larger, so keep your hopes up
At approaching 40 I hope I have enough time left to see humans return to the moon and make it to Mars, but I doubt it.
So all through this was Mr. Rogers singing "Just who are the stars in your Neighborhood".
Drinking game! Take a 🥃 whenever he says "that of the sun." 🥂
Very Interesting. I rnjoyed watching.😀
What kind of gravity on Ross 128-B? Being 30% larger i assume it would be tough to even stand or have the strength to walk? Complex life at best would be jellyfish or squid-like creatures with those kinds of pressures
Not exactly accurate. See, you are trying to equate our prespective of the pressure of evolution to other planets. The beauty of evolution is that organisms adapt to the enviroment rather than the other way around. They can have giant creatures or microbes for all we know who can adapt to the pressures.
Thank you Kosmo❤️ amazing infos about our neighbours
So looking at our Oort Cloud and looking at house close the nearest star is. It theoretically might also have an Oort Cloud and they might be touching right?
Wooow, finally a good recommendation by the algorithm…!!!…🤣🤣
I’m so glad that I came across this channel!!!!
SENSATIONAL!!!!
Great video!!!👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
There's something creepy about attempting to wanna explore other planets.. it's like traveling randomly in the middle of the ocean in hope u find land. Just being in the thicc of it all makes you feel very exposed and intimidated by it all.. who knows what these planets hide.
I think that is called kenophobia. I have it and it makes me shudder just thinking about it.
The other planets aren't the problem. It's what lurks in the void, a trillion miles from home, that will shatter your mind.
Just how the vikings must have felt on their way west.
@@colinmerritt7645 what do you think is in the void
And then there are people like me. If I were possible I’d jump at the chance to explore new planets.
I kinda feel like I was born at the wrong time. Too late to explore the Earth, but too early to explore space. So I’m relegated to just looking up and wondering what future generations will get to see.
Exactly the video I was looking for
If Ross 128 is a Red Dwarf, then wasn't it once a normal star? If so, then wouldn't Ross 128B have once orbited Ross 128 at a distance closer than Mercury is to our sun? If so, then Ross 128B would seem to not have the building blocks of life since the planet was once baked like our planet Mercury.
No, what remains from some stars after its end can be quite a number o things... but not a red dwarf... those are just tiny stars.
@@dsm828 No kidding? That says how much I DON'T know about stars. If that's the case, then perhaps there IS life on Ross 128B...
It is funny when you watch so much Astronomy videos that 78000 years sounds like a short time.
It’s funny when youre so long that 78000 inches seems short.😎
I wonder, if we weren't in a rather sparse region of our galaxy, that in turn is on the edge of a supercluster, that in turn is looking out across a supervoid... would we be able to see even a fraction of the stuff we see? I mean, the light pollution from being in a dense region of a dense region within a dense region would limit our deep-space views, no?
From what I understand, our Earth lies two thirds out on our arm of the Milky Way galaxy. I’m under the impression that our region is indeed “rather sparse”, relatively speaking. If we were closer, such as half way from the center of our galaxy, I wonder if we would find ourselves in the middle of a much denser area in terms of the number of stars that exist near to us, filling our night sky with luminosity. Perhaps because more stars would be closer, we might even see more of their colors directly, and perhaps more easily see nebulous objects also.
I saw a diff channel claim our galaxy supercluster does in fact reside in the largest supervoid in the observable Universe, yet I hear from other vids thaf Bootes Void is the biggest. I don’t know if they mean Bootes is the largest relative from OUR perspective or what, the two ideas both being correct confuse me. Maybe somebody knowledge on this will comment and cle
15:50 the result of a supernova is a neutron star or a black hole. White dwarves are the remnants of red giants after the outer shells are ejected into space.
⭐⭐⭐Nice catch.
But, I must ask if you are _sure_ it always works that way, in every case?
7 degrees cooler than earth...must be Scotland...
Awesome video I enjoyed it can't wait to see more soon 😀😀
Someone recently, jokingly, said: "There is no end to Space." They were not joking LOL
As Human die ,so Stars.Everything dies
The fact that we learn about objects that are light years away from us and no one has EVER physically seen but deemed as true is kinda funny when you think about it
?
'no one has ever physically seen'
?
well what the fcuk was it in the telescope if not the actual planet, star etc? what? a smudge on the mirror/lens? what?
I’m speaking on how does one have any type of knowledge of an object that’s light years away
You know, you COULD'VE googled this. We can know A LOT about these objects in several ways.
First is through the science of spectroscopy. By examining the emitted light, we can know the chemical composition & what its made of. All elements produce unique spectral lines in their emission spectra... Its like the element's unique "light fingerprints." So by examining the light and breaking it down into its spectrum, we can know exactly what its made of.
Also, we can know things like the object's mass & size by its orbital period, etc.
We can know how far the objects are from us through a bunch of ways. For example, through trigonometric parallax (which is basically the same method that surveyors use in construction).
Google is your friend. Use it.
Aite my boi
@@Meachy2x ????????
Your explanation is awesome. 😍
Excellent video.
The Universe is designed for the creation of life, it's everywhere.
There may be bacterial life everywhere, as it is very hardy; but advanced life (and intelligent life) requires billions of years of stable environments. The star can’t throw X-ray or gamma ray flares. It is helpful if the planet has a large satellite (such as our moon), but ours arouse from a very unlikely collusion between us and a mars sized planet - and not a direct hit either. It was an oblique hit that tore off enough material for the moon. Even then, advanced life may not flourish, as there were several times during our history that life was nearly extinguished (such as the “snowball earth” event). There may indeed be other intelligent life out there, but it would be prudent to be skeptical until it is truly found. Science fiction movies have conditioned us to think that intelligent life is plentiful, but science requires proof, not fantasy.
Oh I don’t know. With millions of stars in our galaxy, most with planets around them, and then there being millions of galaxies the sheer numbers would seem to favour life occurring somewhere else.
Alas with distances being so long it’ll be a long time before we meet any, provided both species do eventually figure out FTL.
I subscribed to this channel in the first 10 seconds of the video I immediately saw the professionalism in the presentation good work!!
Do most stars have planets around them are or they mostly without planets? And are most of the planets that surround stars rocky or gaseous (gas giants)? Would it make much sense to try and reach the nearest stars to our own solar system if they are unlikely to have planetary bodies orbiting them (making up a solar system) with at least one of those bodies having Earth‐like characteristics?
This video put me to sleep, and it was amazing thank you
I like how one of the exoplanets is called Ross 128b. I know one of the moons of Saturn is called Phoebe. Are there other astral bodies called Monica, Chandler, Joey and Rachel? Seems like Ross and Phoebe could do with the rest of their friends!
Wonderful video, so fascinating and educational.
No one told you life was going to be this way?
I prefer the more Romanesque/Ancient Greek names. Jupiter, Enceladus,Titania etc. How about a moon/exoplanet named Sagan or a black hole after Einstein? How about just Stein? Sounds better than a whole solar system named Gliese or Kepler and a number besides it. Very unoriginal. Sagan, Einstein, Clerk Maxwell,Tesla and others deserve it. Lastly, keep the star Boyajian instead of KIC whatever. Boyajian sounds much more alien and exotic!👽💫✨🪐🚀😉
a new year every 10 days!!! yeah boy!!!
If UFO'S are from outside our solar system, the best odds are that they come from Ross128b.
I think they are from further away because of FTL capability.
Anyone else concerned at 11:18 about Fomalhaut-A going super-nova only 25 light-years away?
That's just on the border of the supernova safety zone. I'm gonna be freaking out in a billion years.
One nitpick about the video: the music is too loud, to the point of distracting from the narration.
I was there and I was here September 26 2021 thank you Kosmo
Your accent is interesting!
Can only assume it's automated or fake! Not even the Queen says "mass" like that.
South African
It's horrible.
Incredible rich content you made. Don't stop making such content. 😊
Really enjoy your vids Kosmo!
Just one suggestion- you shouldn't say e.g. "3 times as small" or "5 times lighter".
We know what you mean to say but it makes no logical sense and therefore is logically meaningless.
e.g. what does "1 time smaller" or "1 time lighter" mean? - it's meaningless.
Far better to say "one third the mass" or "one fifth the size",both of which make sense.
Keep up the good work! :-) .
Thank you! I thought I was the only one who found that weird. It's not just here - that usage seems to be in most of Kosmos's videos. Multiplying something usually makes it bigger, not smaller!
Visually stunning though - I'm a happy subscriber - it's just that the script could do with a little tweaking.
Your voice is so calming😙💖
This has got to be one of the most confusing accents i've ever heard.
i want to say a cross between british and south african.. with a touch of butler-robot
Sounds like someone putting on a posh accent and not quite succeeding in pulling it off.
@@bdonwiddit444 “butler robot” describes it perfectly lol
@@view1st couldn't have put it better myself. Really off putting
It's sounds South African to me
Finally. Thankyou kosmo
(intro) he whispers like Biden weighing his point to journalists some moments ago.
Leave your politics out of a space video.
C'mon man, leave the politics out of this. No fan of any politician, from anywhere, and it makes comments threads boring.
Lol this reminds me of Earth Space Dock in Star Trek Online. Pretty much every player is there because they like some form of ST, but 80% of the time the zone chat was clogged with people blabbering about US politics.
Not all was lost though. When Leonard Nimoy, the actor who played the original Spock died I decided to fly to Vulcan to remember him in my own way. After beaming down to the surface I was surprised to find that I wasn’t alone. Hundreds of others had done the same thing, packing several instances of the zone. The Devs must have noticed our impromptu gathering because they put a memorial in the place we gathered.
So yeah humans can be both smart and stupid.
Wonderful!!!! Realy Exaiting !
Send joe biden to space
Remember there was a petition to prevent Jeff Bezos from returning to Earth.
It would just be more space junk! 🙁☹️🤪
It's sooo cool how many stars God has made!
legend has it. That the camera man is inviable in everything
Thanks!
I feel sympathetic for all the stars in the universe. Theyre not famous like the ones in hollywood
Love the video, great graphics very interesting.
Best channel on youtube.
Outstanding!!!!!!
WOW!!!!! POW!! AMAZING !!! THANKS !! FROM U.K. (2021)
that Altair music made me think we were entering a Nolan flick
great vid!
Thank you Kosmo I truly enjoy all your videos.
Trump 2024
Fascinating, especially that last star Alturus I think it was named, watch it devour that planet, can't help but think that will be earth some day in the future, and with all the white dwarf stars, you got to wonder how many planets were annihilated along with their inhabitants like us eh, well done video, thanks, and keep them coming 😎🖖
Its sad to say but i don't think we will ever be able to travel beyond the stars the distances involved are just to vast, it takes light itself that long to travel that its like looking back in time observing most stars, humans will need to leave the earth one day but i feel we will have nowhere to go.
I think you should look at Miguel Alcubierre's work, NASA has been working on a workable space drive to send ships close to light speed with time dilation due to Relativity the stars may not be as far as they seem...All we have to do is stop squabling among ourselves and do it.
Just watched a short video there, was good i learned a few things i wasn't aware of will be looking more into it thanks 👍
some of the most interesting objects in the universe are millions and billions of light years away..sad that we cannot yet travel to places that are even just one light year away, and man may never be able to..even in the future