Is the Kirchhoff EQ really better than Fabfilter ProQ3?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มิ.ย. 2024
- The TBTech Kirchoff EQ aims to take the crown of Fabfilter's pro-q3 eq.
Does it succeed?
💜 AMEK 200 vs AMEK 250 • Plugin Alliance will H...
Get pro-q3 here: www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
💜 Get 7% off for your first year on Distrokid by clicking here!: distrokid.com/vip/whitenoises...
💜Get great vocals with 10% off on your www.vocalfy.com purchase with code WHITENOISE10
Plugin Deals - updated 21 June 2024
All of these links are affiliate and help to support this channel 😊
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Plugin with every Plugin Boutique paid purchase:
Rhodes V-Pan or Krotos Dehumaniser Simple Monsters
www.pluginboutique.com/?a_aid...
Lowest prices ever on Newfangled Audio and Eventide plugins:
eventideinc.pxf.io/ZQgA2K
Karanyi Sounds sale - up to 51% off:
www.pluginboutique.com/meta_p...
Univ
Wavesfactory Trackspacer $41:Bundle
www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
Native Instruments Massive $19:
www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
IK Multimedia Intro Sale - up to 83% off:
www.pluginboutique.com/deals/...
KIIVE plugins up to 50% off:
www.kiiveaudio.com/collection...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
00:00 What does each plugin offer?
01:32 Eq Panning
01:51 Noisefloor
02:38 Do not watch this!
03:16 Do you NEED all bells and whistles of the Kirchhoff EQ?
03:56 Dynamic EQ
04:50 The user interface a.k.a GUI
06:33 Which one to choose?
Plugin Alliance will hate me for this! : AMEK 200 vs AMEK 250 th-cam.com/video/6fAmGGFTvfg/w-d-xo.html
Just a heads up. There is no saturation added to the Kirchhoff EQ. It's just the curves from the vintage eqs that they emulated. There is no saturation in the plugin except for what would be caused by the dynamic eq.
Yup. It’s just curves
Well spot Panie Mateuszu!
This EQ has most definitely taken inspiration from DMG Equilibrium which had hardware modeled EQ curves as well. It still sounds amazing even in 2022!
It has taken more from other plugins as well ;-) Hardware eq curves can obviously be modelled easily, and personally i dont think they make much sense, except for something like the very typical pultec eq curve.
thank you for this real informative video :) and thank you for being transparent and mentioning other plugins
My pleasure!
I just got it from PA and LOVE it!
Awesome!
Both are great EQ's. With the PA Forever $29 subscription(around 30 euro for a full license) kirchhoff wins for me.
Proper choice.
great video and thanks for sharing your perspective. after lots of research I went with the Kircchoff a couple months ago, and to your point there was a learning curve. However, wow, do I love that EQ. FF has the best UX, so if FF did an upgrade and closed the gap I'd likely switch to Pro-Q4. Regardless the Kirchhoff is amazing for surgery - the dynamic upward and downward (expansion vs. compression) capabilities on the same band are awesome (bit hard to sort at first, but awesome in the end - not sure if Q3 has that)
No you cant do upward and downward with 1 eq band at the same , you need to split it between two.
That function in kirchhoff is pretty sweet.
Kirchoff doesn't emulate differents eqs...only the bands curves.
yup!
What even are the differences between various EQs?
@@aichi337nova is the best and there’s a free version. That’s all you need to know
Both great, use Kirchhoff when i need more control, but generally happy to keep Q3 as my workhorse.
..is there a way to see the colliding frequencies in kirchoff like in ff pro q3? that would be amazing....regards
I do share your first impressions about this plugin. For the good and the bad. Great video and thank you!!
And thank you!
I miss the EQ Match function in Kirchhoff. Beside of that I would vote for Kirchhoff. Thanks for the comparison!
You're welcome!
Disappointed to learn that EQ Match isn't included. I guess "Kirchhoff has every feature Pro Q has" was a tad hyperbolic.
you can however customise most of the gui on the kirchoff, you can even load a custom picture as background 😊
I resisted the temptation to make kirchhoff look exactly like pro-q3.....
@@whitenoisestudio 😂😂😂
True story ^^
The Toneboosters EQ 4 is very easy to use and have most of the things you need from Pro Q3 without breaking the band. Check it out before pulling the trigger on either of these EQs.
Thanks for letting us know!
Should note that the dynamic EQ in toneboosters EQ4 does not do expansion. Only upwards compression.
Fabfilter has the Volcano plug which has distortion modes in it. More creative but can be used subtle easily
True,. And Saturn actually would cover a bit of that as well. But imagine having the eability to add just a bit of saturation on the peaks of 1 frequency band.
@@whitenoisestudio yes, like the ole' Hornet Total EQ
@@whitenoisestudio That's basically Wavesfactory Spectre, right? :) I use that as sort of a coloring (boosting) EQ, next to my clean EQs.
ToneBoosters EQ is also great! The best value on the market IMHO.
Good to know!
I agree! I recently tried it, and I really like it!😉👍
Kirchoff will be my Go To. Even if Pro Q 4 takes the crown I’ll be using this one. Something about it works for my workflow. To each their own Pro Q 3 is really good. Industry standard as well
Your comment is spot on. It comes down to workflow and preference.
Q4? when ?
@@nofood1 even since Kirchoffs release people been hyping up a Q4 now the company hasn’t announced anything people are just talking about it I believe
I’m sure fabfilter is working on Q4 but they won’t release anything before it’s finished. Nothing has been announced.
fabfilter understands very well the competition that challenge their superb products, especially when it's (Q3) one of the finest and most popular digital EQ's ever created. You can surely bet Kirchhoff is in their crosshairs and when they introduce Q4, it will not only address everything Kirchhoff has challenged (and good for them to do so!) but will make catching up again very, very difficult. It is bound to happen soon, as Kirchhoff has made big news and created loss profits for fabfilter by their existence and acclaimed exposure. That said, things are quiet at fabfilter for now, but this is because (in my estimation), they are smart. When Q4 comes out it will not be rushed. When you're the finest you must ensure absolute perfection when you launch the next state-of-the-art product. Others are watching and technology moves quickly so it must be done perfect out of the gate. fabfilter has pretty good odds of meeting this challenge. An exciting anticipation indeed ;-)
Very nice video, thank you for the updated breakdown of each and making your videos easy and enjoyable to watch, A+!
I was just looking for this video last week XD can please do a comparison between Smart EQ 3 from Sonible
And here it is!
Love your videos
Thanks man. And love your comment ;-)
very helpful! I went ahead and tried Kirkoff
and to be honest there is too much going on
and I an a simple type of dude so stay with pro Q ! Thanks
Bit the same here.
Oh well, maybe ill get used to it at some point lol! awesome videos by the way straight to the point and very informative compared to other I watch👍
Did the new Plugin-Alliance version add saturation/circuit emulation for the EQ models? Asking because they previously only modeled the EQ curve but it was still the same clean, linear EQ.
As far as i can see its just the curves like it used to be. Cant see any harmonics added by using the ''analog'' curves.
@@whitenoisestudio So I think it's not really coloured it only has musical EQ curves to choose from. When saying coloured I think of harmonics and distortion...
Do you have some thoughts on Pro-Q3 vs Shade Eq from UVI ?
Shade seems way more versatile (randomisation option for example) but here's no linear mode and I find it a bit less transparent. Am I imagining it ?
I have never considered Shade to be a normal EQ or corrective eq, but as an effect tool: th-cam.com/video/XxjIWriwe9c/w-d-xo.html
@@whitenoisestudio Thanks for your answer! Yeah probably like everybody, but I yet have to find the reason why it couldn't compare to Pro-Q3 or Kirchhoff as a mixing/mastering Workhorse (with insane sound design options in bonus).
Less transparent or intuitive than those ''normal EQs'' ?
I like Pro Q 3 but I LOVE Kirchhoff EQ, been using it since release (not the PA version)
And workflow? how does it work out for you?
@White Noise Studio PQ3 is faster but as far as I am concerned these are problem solving EQs rather than sweetening EQs which would be faster to dial in. I guess what I am saying is I do not mind spending extra time fixing using Kirchhoff 🫡
I luv fab filter plug-ins, for me the best of the industry
Great comparison! I've got both and agree 100% with your assessment.
Ha! Good to hear ;-)
I just discovered Kirchoff a few days ago and I'm very impressed with it. I would like to give it a go! Btw, I love your channel and the thick Dutch accent, shoutout from Zaandam :)
Haha kaaskoppen united!
Great video as always! I've been using SIR Audio Tools' StandardEQ for a while now, which is fine for what I need. Customizable and even has a resonant frequency detector. Someday I'll upgrade to Pro-Q3, maybe if Fabfilter has a crazy Black Friday sale. We will see...
I dunno! I think last year there were Black Friday deals for fabfilter.
I like Kirchoff more then ProQ. Its much cleaner and less phasing, and my ears are over sensitive to phasing so Kirchoff is a big win! But yea ProQ is awesome too! But if i had to pick one its very clear. And man the Dynamic EQ on Kirchoff is perfect. 😊
They're both good tools. Good to see you have found your peronal favorte. Does that phasing also happen for you when you switch to natural phase or liniear phase in proq3?
@@whitenoisestudio yea it does. Ofcourse there is a difference in phasing/shifts between linear and natural but in general i hear phasing “rotation shifts” in nearly all EQ’s. Only Kirchoff in 117bit and x2 reduces that by a lot! It seems a very little hole in my left eardrum causes me being overly sensitive as stated by the doctor who said my Hearing capability is higher as normal (with hearing test’s) which probably makes me so extremely sensitive to phasing and rotation/Shifts. But trust me i dont like it when working with audio! Wish I didn’t had that awful sensitivity😢 so i could focus on making music instead of trying to fix everything……… So thats why Kirchoff is way cleaner to my ears as a lot of people even wont hear that clean clarity and preferably should not hear it either. Cheers
@@patrickalphenaar Oddly enough, I've been getting the same feeling. I've been using Pro Q3 as a surgical digital EQ for years, and until now, I haven't found a better EQ type until I tried Kirchhoff EQ at 117bit 2x, the difference is remarkable. :)
I'm afraid to tell you that you have hearing issues
Does it have External spectrum visualization to layer up and work with other eqs? Pro q 3 can do one other instance as can most stock daw eqs, voxengo span plus can do multiple layers but on demo I couldn't find that function in Kirchoff but maybe I missed it?
Nope. The Sonnox Claro can do that very well as well.
@@whitenoisestudio great I'll check that 👍
How does the kirchoff have split function like sustain and. Attack??? I never noticed it ,can you explain?
I found kirchoff a bit hard to use. Which leads to wasting a precious amount of time when using it. I like the dynamics section though….in comparison to proq3 which is very fast and intuitive. When I reach for digital eq I end up with Infinity eq from slate which is far more easy to use as I dont have proq3. Can’t wait for slate to finally release a version with dynamics in it. Im thriving to use kirchoff yet….
I have the same. Its every time a little step extra to achive something which fabfilter can do straight away.I should check inifty EQ by slate, I think i have it.
I have a quesiton about the noisefloor one. I may be wrong on it, just let me know. If every one of a pro q3 has -175 db noise, does that mean two pro q 3 will boost that noise to -169( 6db louder) Then in a large mix when we have over 40-60 audio tracks, do we time that with 20 30 as the factor? That maens we end up with audible noise in our mix?
You have to boost unhealthy amounts for it ever to be become a problem. 24bit equals 144dB of headroom and you will never play at that volume. Before that noise floor become a problem, any other noise in your mix from plugins or simply recording will be hearable first.
@@whitenoisestudio But theoretically, I think it depends on where you put the eq at. If it is the very first plugin you put in a raw signal such as a recorded piano or guitar, that noise floor might be affect by those other saturation and compressor in the future. Especially in genre like edm, people use significant saturation to do sound design. In those circumstances, I think the cleaner the better.
BTW, Kirchoff eq still has one more shortage that is the automation part. At least in Logic, when you automate the plugin, you don't see a damn number on the automation curve. So you have to open the plugin to match the reduction and boost. That is stupid as hell. Lots of times, I ended up by copying all of the eq setting by hand to pro q3 to just do a automation.
Nice video as always man. Regarding "When Pro q got a dynamic Eq function the others rushed to do it too" lets not forget Tdr Nova which not only is Parallel like the new Pulsar 8200 but also Dynamic with Attack and Release settings for a looong time before Pro q3. I believe it was 2014 0r 2015
I find it by far the most value for money even if I have shifted my workflow towards Pro q3 I the last years
The TDR Nova is pretty affordable and you're right. Its usually more like ''the one who screams loudest get's the credit''. I used dynamic eqs as well before Pro-q3, but can't really remember which one it was. Maybe a DDMF one.
@@whitenoisestudio Cool stuff! Yeah I know what you mean with the "loud screamers" :-)
That being said after all these comparisons where Pro q is being dragged into it made me curious when and how Pro Q4 will come out and how it will look like
Sonnox Claro is my clean eq as of right now, and MAutoDynamic for Dynamic EQ ...looking for my 'Surgical EQ' and might get the Kirchoff with all those bells and whistles...
IMO I would go with pro-q3. Kirchhoff hass bells and whistles but also bells and whistles which are just bells and whistles ^^
If case if it's not clear,
The Pro-Q3 came out AFTER Kirchoff EQ has.
When was that? Still: pro-q2 ;-)
What if your mixing 125 tracks and put the Pro Q on everything? The noise might build up and be audible, I dunno.
Theoretically you could but the wav should be very low level as well. Big chance that the noise recorded in the audio file will be a problem first. So in real life scenarios, I really doubt that.
I have both. When I don't think about it, I grab the PRO-Q3. Just out of a habit. But there is one thing I really enjoy on the Kirchhof. The low cut and high cut slope settings are not fixed like on the PRO-Q3. Well they are, but not when you use the second knob beside the slope knob. And to be honest... that can give better (more natural) results. I also did a comparison on how both eq's sound. And I did like the sound of the Kirchhof a little bit more. But I will repeat that comparison once more. I hope fabfilter will strike back with PRO-Q4. Did not realized it was released 5 years ago already 🤔
On the slopes in proq3: you can select different slopes and when you play with the gain and q knob you can adjust those more.
Is there a masking function on the Kirchoff EQ like the pro Q3? Can’t find that anywhere.
What's the masking function?
@@whitenoisestudio the duck eq function
I feel like the most important thing was glossed over, which is the sound.. would love to see and hear a side by side audio example.
They're both clean i.e. no sound caused by harmonics added to create a sound.
Let me give you some Info from the test I did with this plugin. I selected an EQ point and applied to be a SIDE Bell. When I select only this part (to solo it to monitor only this side node) to check inside Voxengo SPAN PLUS, I noticed something I did not like at all. First, the sound gets MONO by soloing it, it is not suppose to sound MONO because, the part of the EQ I want to listen is a SIDE node and must sound only at the sides, with a wide phase issue, Voxengo shows me a green plasma wave indicating all is OK without showing me any red information telling me that the sound is gone to the sides and a warning for me to let me know, that there is strong a phase issue! I say this because I know Voxengo very good and I know how it works with any other EQ like Stage Digital Inf or Fab EQ3, by saying this I felt really very disappointing that this EQ does not work as it is suppose to behave, it outputs a wrong information easily captured by Voxengo, maybe I have done something wrong inside Kirsch but, I don´t think so, I have a playback from different tracks in Stereo and Voxengo must tell me all concerning about any change I do in any EQ plugin and the INFO I get from Kirsch is really very wrong and made me feel about this plugin not to use it at all, I don´t think this EQ is useful based on what I said! For those who know the importance to use Voxengo in the master output (to check the MONO compatibility of a mix and the side energy inside a song) will understand what I tried to explain here with my post! Let me know if I did something wrong and correct me if it is the case, greetings from Germany and as always, great videos you produce! Thank you. ps. if you wish, I can make a video to show you what I mean in case you don´t get my point, yes? :-)
Sides will usually solo as a mono signal, or as a very weird out of phase type of signal. Some developers choose for a mono sound, others don't.
I prefer mono, because with the out of phase sound is hard to judge if your adjustments sound right. But normally i never solo mid side and listen in total.
Sides solo-ing is weird because the sides cannot really sound right without the mid signal component because of physics.
The sides component of a mid side signal is derived from the phase difference between left and right channel in a particular way:
M = L+R
S = L-R
Now the + and - refer to phase , where the - is flipped phase.
It blows my mind how many producers and sound engineers get super excited by any and every plugin! Missing the point completely. This plugin is vast with a variety of options to control the frequencies...but you could do that any way. Using this plugin just means you have more steps to do with it when you can achieve each aspect individually and pay attention to each stage separately to this plugin. ProQ3 still is perfect and helps me tame an individual component of a track and find a pocket for it, coupled with an SSL EQ to allow me to fit the component in the track and provide some colour to the track. Coupled with some compression+limiting etc...guys this is stuff you have already, so please don't fall for this 'this plugin is a game changer' marketing tactic. Peace!
I felt that way about Q3😂
And again Toneboosters EQ is ignored...... I find the dynamic settings in Pro-Q is very clunky and TB already fixed this 3 years ago. Thanks for this review anyway.
Hoi Jos!
Nah, its not ignored. Well it is, but 99,9% of all eq's are since this video is about pro-q3 vs kirchhoff.
I like the simplicity of the pro-q3 dyamic eq actually. It just works.
I too find the Pro-Q dynamic section just fast to use! Though I have found a pretty fast workflow with the ToneBoosters EQ. Hornet Total Eq is also quite good for the price, but not nearly as sleek.
Pro-Q + Infinity EQ + TDR Nova 🤩
Love that Nova
FL stock EQ with custom presets saved for the win 🏆
That will be great in other daws! ow no, wait ....
Wow watched 5 videos now and not one person will compare the spectrum analyzers and say if Kirchhoff has the spectrum freeze feature or not, which is super useful.
pro q-3 all the way, i dont need any gimmicks. if i need neve or ssl sound eq ill just use neve or ssl eq. pro q is the king
Or queen?
Claro > Pro Q3 . Got it on this November sale, its the best eq out there.
It's a great tool, especially with the ability to compare different audiotracks within 1 window.
I still prefer TDR Nova to be honest,
and unlike those Dynamic EQs, it's Parallel, not Serial, so works better for my use cases :)
Doesn’t parallel dynamic eq missed the point a bit of dynamic eq? Tell me how you use it, to help me understand.
@@whitenoisestudio it's perhaps bit non-intuitive to understand, with parallel dynamic EQ like Nova, bands are processed simultaneously without affecting each other, which results in different sound results,
Dan Worral has nice comparison/explanatory video on that topic: th-cam.com/video/KW-p-Rbm1RU/w-d-xo.html
Ahh you mean parallel like that. yeah that makes total sense.
I had parallel in mind like a sort of dry wet balance which I think would be weird.
Does Kirchoof Eq have the EQ match option?
Nope.
In reality, Pro Q3 is still valuable compared to Kirchhoff (even though I went with the latter).
For Kirchhoff to be the definitive digital EQ on the market, it still needs 3 major functions:
- Static Match EQ (like Pro Q3) and Dynamic Match EQ (like TDR Nova GE);
- Frequency visualization of conflicting areas between 2 or more signals (like Pro Q3);
- Static and Dynamic processing of Transient and Tonal frequency content (like Eventide Split EQ).
If those 3 major functions will be implemented in Kirchhoff 2.0, it's game over.
It will never be game-over. Musicians and engineers love to stick to tools they know and have used ;-)
The dynamic settings do have a control that lets you adjust between it responding more to transients rather than the whole signal, which is nice
With FF proQ I can have a fast workflow with good results. Too many options of Kirchhoff-EQ would distract me only, too many possible decisions. ProQ dynamic eq works fine, there is also TDR Nova which has more options and works great and is even free. I like your video. Thanks :)
And I like your comment! Thanks as well :-)
have both. I don't use proq anymore.
YEP!
That's a clear statement^^
I really want to love Pro Q3 alternatives, but there's no faster and to the point workflow than that
Pro-q3 has that nailed down.
When someone asks me what is the the best XYZ plugin... My answer is "the one that you own and know" I love Fabfilter stuff simply cuz I'm owning it over 15 years and I know it inside and out same as my hardware stuff.
If I was starting from complete 0... I'd go for Tokyo Dawn plugins for price and performance and possibly klanghelm for some colorful stuff.
Acoustica is great too sound wise... But lately I feel like they r underperforming on cpu to sound quality compared to other vst developers.
That's the thing right. My guess is that workflow will always win.
@@whitenoisestudio whatever brings best sounding results in quickest time frame... 😁
So far no one complained yet from having 3 harmonics at -90db from some older saturation plugins from aliasing 😅
But don't tell anyone 🤫
Shhhhhht! Don’t tell anyone!
Acoustica is IR sample based for giant CPU hit. Can be good and bad though modeling gets better every day.
Equilibrium is better even has an analogue option in the back settings
Yeah, but not the subject of this video ;-)
Regarding your comment on fonts being a fixed size, and not scaling, if you go into settings, GUI tab, then turn on "Use Vector Font" and restart your host DAW, the font size scales when you change the plugin default view size to 150%
So this criticism isn't really valid, you didn't turn on the option for the plugin to do this
Not in default.
@@whitenoisestudio Okay, but why does that matter? You turn it on once, then it's done. It's a weird complaint, that you have an option to have it both ways
Eventides Split?
I love Eventide Split and its a great companion for Pro-Q3, but not a replacement.
Pro Q3 is good enough. Just Waiting for pro Q4
Yup. It's due for an update. But fabfilter only releases a plugin when it's really done. So who knows when? I dont and I asked them .
Pro-Q4 will have all this plus Soothe + Gullfoss + SmartEQ + SplitEQ built in. Dreaming is free. 😪😪
Lol it is.
Who knows?
@@whitenoisestudio it's coming, I've beta tested it in the future. I'm a time traveler!
Nice! I already made a review in the future and I can tell you, the plugin does things!
@@whitenoisestudio ah! that explained all the quick video of the newly released plugins everytime!
the best ever digital EQ is Weiss EQ1 period.
.
kirchhoff need armonic distortion on eq emulations
If its just curves its not really special isnt it.
Option Paralysis: The EQ
I have Kirchhof and Q3
Theo are both absolutely top products.
I still prefer the Q3. his workflow alone is just so good.
But I also have to say that at the moment I'm more and more preferring the SSL X-EQ2, it's not that comfortable and doesn't have a dynamic band, but it just sounds so loving!!!
Never used the SSL X-EQ2. They look pretty ^^
Justifying purchasing a fab product?
Nope.
@@whitenoisestudio Kirchoff is a great deal for us plugin alliance members.
@@JakeyWakey absolutely. Added in my subscription bundle.
You should have turned on the subtitles switch
that is something you really need to do yourself.
Just the fact that they ripped off pro q3 GUI annoys me
Bijna five years old! 😊
Ownee, i almost had het goed!
@@whitenoisestudio the on holder wins ;)
Pro q is taxing on cpu
Kirchoff is pro q + FL studio parametric EQ 2
Pro Q 10 ladies & gentlemen
Lets hope for version 4 first ;-)
Yeah Im just whelmed with the Kirchoff. Tons of features won't make your music better.
haha. Well there's an eq for everyone these days ;-)
It's bijna 5 years old... 🙂 btw, I love the Kirchhoff EQ way more than Fabfilter Pro-Q3.
Only kaaskoppen wil get it ^^ What do you like better anout the Kirchhoff?
What I like more is the control over the parameters with a channel strip-like interface, perhaps old-fashioned as you say, but very clear per eq band. and I really like the sidecian function.
I also use the Fabfilter Pro-Q3 and I also like this plugin. In my opinion there is a place for both plugins in the dynamic world of EQs. Both plugins are recommended, in my opinion.
It's 'bijna' 5 years old. :-)
Only kaaskoppen will get it ^^
@@whitenoisestudio ha ha ja! Lekker filmpie overigens.
Dankje!
how does the wiess softube compare to this bad boy?? anyone??
How can it be cleaner when it nulls perfectly with pro Q3? Dan Worral proved it, down to -180db absolute zero null? I don't believe you.
Fabfilter every time
That’s quite often! ;-)
Fabfilter bias is pretty blatant here. Splitting all kinds of hairs, grasping at all kinds of straws to justify not acknowledging the Kirchoff has it beaten hands down. Agree that the noisefloor is irrelevant, but all the other issues mentioned here really are edge cases that don't affect me or the vast majority of users. The only thing I wish Kirchoff had is support for eq graph on the track view in Pro Tools, but even then that's a pretty minor gripe. Also, I think the point about doing dynamics (I noted the workflow example was broadband) at a different stage is fairly inane - the vast majority of EQ I do is at the problem-solving stage wherein the ability to focus that (spectral correction) dynamically is invaluable; polish is often the later job of saturation or other box-tone introducing plugins.
''Bijna" 5 years old? haha
:-) Only dutchies will get it ^^
@@whitenoisestudio 🔥💯
Performance wise? No. Pro Q is much faster and more responsive
TBTech Kirchoff EQ has the WORST account set up and managment system ever. I'd love to try it but it got me beat.
Exactly, for PA users it's dead simple.
The king is the one with the lowest CPU usage.
If it's a hungry boy, it's out the window.
Your daw’s own eq will be the winner ;-)
Spoiler alert: No it's not. It's been measured.
^^ Shhht , you need to watch the video ;-)
To me this Kirchhoff is a gimmick and a gimmick. Emulations are only replicate curves of analog EQs, not something I’d want from digital EQ. 117 thing does not make any difference. Split linear phase is… do you really care about phase above x hz? Me not. But only 2x oversampling is an issue. And all this advanced compressor controls in EQ? I have MB compressor for it.
I usually watch tons of music production videos on TH-cam instead of working 😂. However, I haven’t seen any one on TH-cam using this EQ yet. This tells a lot.
All this talk about features, design, etc..... not a word about how it sounds. Unbelievable. Nobody, it seems, dares to talk about the one thing that matters more than anything else... the sound. Is there a single video that will just do some sweeps with no talking?
Because it’s just bloody eq curves and nothing more. The thing doesn’t “sound”.
yes Kirchhoff is def better
BS. The noise floor is not below human reception, it is with 24bit resolution not there.
It’s measured at 24bit. With your “bs” comment.