The Thing From Another World (1951) Official Trailer #1 - Howard Hawks Horror Movie
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2013
- Subscribe to TRAILERS: bit.ly/sxaw6h
Subscribe to COMING SOON: bit.ly/H2vZUn
Subscribe to CLASSIC TRAILERS: bit.ly/1u43jDe
Like us on FACEBOOK: goo.gl/dHs73
Follow us on TWITTER: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
The Thing From Another World (1951) Official Trailer #1 - Howard Hawks Horror Movie
Scientists and American Air Force officials fend off a blood-thirsty alien organism while at a remote arctic outpost. - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
"Flames cannot destroy the Thing"
Yeahhh, just you wait about 30 years, buddy...
they meant this thing not that parasyte bro
@@Guywhoselifeisshit play on words buddy
@@Guywhoselifeisshitthe who?
@@miguelrodriguez-pe1sswhat are you two lads talking of?
Growing up in NYC whenever we were hit with a snow storm I would hunker down late at night smoke some weed and watch this on vhs later dvd. .nothing else like it absolute classic one of a kind
IT WAS BETTER WITHOUT THE WEED
The budget for the original 1951 Movie, "The Thing (from another world)" was only $40,000. in US dollars. James Arness was so embarrassed as the creature, he did not wish to attend the opening. He always said he looked like a "carrot on a stick". The main reason they changed from the shape-shifting format was the budget just did not support it. However, this early science fiction movie is still considered a real classic and remains my favourite. If you do see the original, note in the first shot when they see the UFO form in the ice from their plane, a small black item which looks like rocks. In fact that is believed to be the ice cutting machine was not removed from the original shot. I saw the original when I was in 5th grade...my dad and I were definitely scared...those early movies are still great classics!
The fire fighting scene was like nothing else. Can't imagine the stunt work prep going into that.
I'm the 50th like!
Love this, thank you for sharing this!
James Arness is an evolved vegetable come from outer space. His flying saucer crashes and is frozen in ice. The Thing is retrieved and inadvertently thawed. Havoc ensues until it is killed using electricity. Even in 1951, we were thinking about the directions in which extraterrestrial life might evolve. It is a chilling scene as the men circle the ice-covered saucer to reveal its shape. We are admonished to "Watch the skies!"
You can do a lot with a low budget, a great, atmospheric story and good actors. Something that is lost on todays producers and directors .
I was pleased that zRoku often shows the Thing q951. Sure Thing 1988?? has more scary points than 1951 but 1951 has thatcreepy feeling you get on black & white
Also, Mr
Dillon, the space carrot also had a good time "Them", about 1954
Forbidden Planet is the 1st really good color "Stat Trek ". Don't know much about the 2001?? Version of the Thing:
A great movie, the way the dialogue overlapped made it believable.. watched it again last night and noticed the scene where you see the outside of the officers club there's an icicle blowing in the wind,lol.
I loved this movie as a child, and still have a fondness for it. 😁
There's endless great things about this movie as far as its groundbreaking nature for horror/sci-fi, but one of the things that stands out to me is the fact that unlike so many others of the genre the scientists aren't all of the same mind. They broke down into two groups, the ones whom understood the danger and thought it needed to be destroyed regardless the loss to science and the others which were those whom wanted to preserve it, though they even differentiated from each other in that some clearly were torn on the idea while others wanted to preserve it at any and all costs. I like that small confrontation between Dr. Chapman and Carrington when it is discovered he has planted some of the seeds, you can read a lot in that moment about how angry Chapman is by what he sees as blind recklessness but he still manages to keep a cool demeanor, while Carrington shows that he's scared, deteriorating mentally and not thinking clearly even though for the most part he's been able to keep it from showing in the way he carries himself. If I were to backstory Carrington I'd make it one of his most defining characteristics in how he deals with fear, by learning as much as he can about whatever it is scaring him until he can look at it with total understanding, objectivity and make it lose its scariness, and now with the creature he's confronted with the scariest thing he's even encountered.
As a kid, it scared the hell out of me!
Likewise.
Me to had nightmares for weeks but I was only 11 still blame my older brother for making me watch it
The scene where it crashes through the door...violent as heck!
"What should we call it?"
"The thing."
"Yeah, that fits."
I'm watching this for the first time I can't believe how much fun I'm having!! I'm completely entertained. Just the great film.
Watched it for first time last night and absolutely loved it
Yes, you cannot beat the rapid-fire dialog, the fact that the humans are barely one step ahead of this monster and the do-or-die battle at the end.
Keep watching the skies.
People need to stop saying that the "'82 remake was better". John Carpenter did not "remake" this movie. John Carpenter's "The Thing" is a more faithful interpretation of the 1938 novella "Who goes there?" Both the 1951 version and the 1982 version are based on this novella, the 1951 version merely uses the premise. In fact the only thing "remade" in John Carpenter's 1982 version is the title screen with the flaming title.
No. One. Cares.
Maybe a sequel to the "51' version" is in order. They left a lot of info in that movie to extend the story to the modern day. To hell if it's not based on the original 38' novella. That story worked in 51' and the same paranoia is once again alive in our world today ! MAJESTIC 12 and "the men in black" were in existance at that time .
@@KRhetor You have nothing to contribute other than negative comments, well done
We’re all proud of you for reading the Wikipedia page
The' 82 version was basically a special effects movie , this was not.
The way the title burns away, letting the light through, still looks amazing!
One of the greatest movies ever and they had to begin the trailer with the water-in-the-face scene.
In 1951, the U. S. military still enjoyed a near-universal approval. The military characters are treated with great respect, even admiration, with not even a trace of irony. When was the last time you saw this in a movie?
Probably not long after that John Wayne green berets movie that was funded by the army to try improve it's appearance
The original thing is the quintessential science fiction horror thriller all time favorite
Agreed100%
Every element of a great horror movie was included, to include: the post's isolation, the blustery wind howling, the makeup of the creature, the difference in thought and action of the scientists and the military members, the mind or intellect of the monster, the terrifying scenes like, for example, the opening of the greenhouse door, etc, etc.. This was the best sci-fi/horror movie ever made.
Remember that it was made 31 years before _The Thing_ (1982).
Also remember that it's been 41 years since _The Thing_ (1982).
The 1950s feel like it was centuries ago while the 1980s feel like only three or four decades ago.
Classic. Though nothing beats the '82 version.
Totally agree, the old version beats the new. The thing in the new version looked like a crab with too many legs.
@@teddammit5179 Agreed. Without the original, the newer versions wouldn't have been made......
@@milojanis4901 Your wrong Milo, the 82 one was much more faithful to the source material.
The 82 Version and the 2011 version are awesome
@@evilnet1 So what? That doesn't make it better. If that's your main criteria for preferring it, then you better also prefer the original Fifties version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers and The Fly over their remakes.
Scottyy later said he fell over the bed and got a picture of his own big feet. That's the first time I've actually seen the bit. I think it was edited from the release print.
Where’s Ellen Ripley and her flame thrower ?.....
A great classic .....
0:16 what Bill Burr was laughing about on JRE🤣
Fun fact: This was released the same year where “Alice in Wonderland” was also released
This was the movie Tommy Doyle was watching in Halloween.
Despite some flagrant incongruities it's still a classic.
I remember when Godzilla fought "The Thing".
W.S. Harvey: That was Mothra, totally different from this movie.
I saw this movie with my mother, my sister, her husband and my uncle Happy in Toms River, New Jersey.
I saw this as a child I actually still have the movie that goes on a projector that we used to watch it on! Lol
This was the thing before the thing
Awesome!
TIS A CARROT! o>O lol
One of the best old time scary movies.....watch the skies😮
Would you close the door please lol
Try again...
@@stevenjstubbsLost me. It's been 2 years
This was shown on a TV in Halloween 1978
Howard Hawks and John Carpenter's versions couldn't be more different, but I believe that's the secret to making a good Thing movie. It's a stand alone story that isn't meant to be a modern franchise, it needs to be retold in different styles, different ways. The 2011 movie failed in part because it had no real identity or thought of its own, and just tried to piggyback on Carpenter's work.
I didn’t know this existed!
Donde la puedo ver?
Nice
Like a lot of remakes ...they usually are not as good as orginal. They miss the orginal message ....the orginal gives you hope for the future....a good example is the orginal The Day the Earth Stood Still...it won awards for promoting good
will, human relations
ect. The best version of the invasion of the body snatches was black and white ...great cast, and it worked because it was set in a small town and in the end it gave hope that we could survive the evil.
Surprised trailer vs excellent movie 😲😲
This is scarier then The Shinning
The Simpsons parody of The Shining?
read the book. The movie sucked.
What a realistic ai work buddies! Looks like it really was made in the 50's!
1:03 hold still for the camera and say, "CHEESE!!!"
Lol the thing 1952 vs The thing 1982 vs the thing 2011
LOL culturally illiterate Millenials.
The 2011 one was a prequel to the 1982 one though.
Plus
Done
done
0:17 here, have a drink fine sir.
Huh modern science
JESUS CHRIST THERE WAS AN ORIGINAL IN THE 50'S, MY LIFE IS FUCKED IT'S A GOOD THING IMA GONA DIE SOON. STILL THE CONCEPT OF THIS MOVIE IS BRILLIANY AS WELL AS TRUE
'The Thing... From another world...' DCN
Laurie Strode and Tommy Doyle are watching this at this minute.
Plus I find irony in a shocase that says "...Modern Science that challenges the Imagination!" lol SO does it set itself in stone that aliens exist? CONSPIRACY!
Colemen...
Michael brought me here
They be calling each other sus cause this looks like an Among us emergency meeting
always the case. the original is best. shame that even this trailer is a jacked remake.
CLOSE THE DOOR!
nah chill son
Es más icónica la de 1982 de John carpenter
y
Unfortunate "Looks like a lynchin'"
Who else is here from JRE?
Made 2 remakes. Lol
Well thank God they remade it properly.....I get that it was 1951 but still.....that was so bad to watch knowing what john carpenter did
laurie creelmans hate
scott and paulines young first date
incest is not best
#Aksumite
The Ugly of it......way too old to watch for anyone. It's next to a silent movie... ......just......a........step.........above.........a..........silent...............movie!!!!!
My eyes hurt from looking at this Ugly and hearing it.
Thank You for the REMAKE JOHN!!!!!!!!!
#AncSoc
k
Hi
@@Melvinshermen dude u thirsty
#ansoc
hehe
#Ansoc
Among Us
This trailer makes it look like one of the dumbest movies ever made - but I've heard from a lot of people it's one of the best movies ever made. I've got to see this movie.
One of the dumbest comments I ever saw
John carpenter I am going to make a Thing reboot
Universal What a good idea John What are the changes you going to make.
John it going to be in Antarctica where a space ship crashes
Universal that trust the same plot.
John I was not finished the thing can mimic human cell and can transform other pepoule In to aliens.
Universal ok that new
The budget for the original 1951 Movie, "The Thing (from another world)" was only $40,000. in US dollars. James Arness was so embarrassed as the creature, he did not wish to attend the opening. He always said he looked like a "carrot on a stick". The main reason they changed from the shape-shifting format was the budget just did not support it. However, this early science fiction movie is still considered a real classic and remains my favourite. If you do see the original, note in the first shot when they see the UFO form in the ice from their plane, a small black item which looks like rocks. In fact that is believed to be the ice cutting machine was not removed from the original shot. I saw the original when I was in 5th grade...my dad and I were definitely scared...those early movies are still great classics!
#AncSoc
The budget for the original 1951 Movie, "The Thing (from another world)" was only $40,000. in US dollars. James Arness was so embarrassed as the creature, he did not wish to attend the opening. He always said he looked like a "carrot on a stick". The main reason they changed from the shape-shifting format was the budget just did not support it. However, this early science fiction movie is still considered a real classic and remains my favourite. If you do see the original, note in the first shot when they see the UFO form in the ice from their plane, a small black item which looks like rocks. In fact that is believed to be the ice cutting machine was not removed from the original shot. I saw the original when I was in 5th grade...my dad and I were definitely scared...those early movies are still great classics!
The budget for the original 1951 Movie, "The Thing (from another world)" was only $40,000. in US dollars. James Arness was so embarrassed as the creature, he did not wish to attend the opening. He always said he looked like a "carrot on a stick". The main reason they changed from the shape-shifting format was the budget just did not support it. However, this early science fiction movie is still considered a real classic and remains my favourite. If you do see the original, note in the first shot when they see the UFO form in the ice from their plane, a small black item which looks like rocks. In fact that is believed to be the ice cutting machine was not removed from the original shot. I saw the original when I was in 5th grade...my dad and I were definitely scared...those early movies are still great classics!
Uhhhh What's up, Doc, with 3 posts saying the same thing......
Milo Janis it’s a TH-cam glitch