MQ-25 Concept

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 3.6K

  • @nova1726
    @nova1726 4 ปีที่แล้ว +521

    Dear Ace Combat Players,
    ADF Drone Weapon UAV = X-45
    MQ-99 = Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie
    MQ-101 = X-47B
    Arsenal Bird = YB-35

    • @iamf6641
      @iamf6641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      DEAR DEER

    • @joeschmo4391
      @joeschmo4391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      DEAR GOD..

    • @tlshortyshorty5810
      @tlshortyshorty5810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The Arsenal Bird might have the YB-35’s looks and propulsion but it’s a lot closer to the Lockheed CL-1201 in size.
      In addition, the MQ-99 is closer to the EADS Barracuda.

    • @nova1726
      @nova1726 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@tlshortyshorty5810 or the MQ-99 is a mix of both

    • @bleachprovider6001
      @bleachprovider6001 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank u goated man

  • @llenny_uwu1398
    @llenny_uwu1398 5 ปีที่แล้ว +863

    Is the US collaborating with Osea in making these drones? What does Erusea have to say?

    • @kornkernel2232
      @kornkernel2232 5 ปีที่แล้ว +98

      I think Belkans are behind all of this.

    • @brianmo2965
      @brianmo2965 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      KornKernel but belka did nothing wrong

    • @principalityofbelka6310
      @principalityofbelka6310 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@kornkernel2232 Ummm i guess so

    • @razgrizstrigoi1778
      @razgrizstrigoi1778 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@kornkernel2232 Damn Belkans!!!!!

    • @raihanrizki2207
      @raihanrizki2207 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Belka did nothing wrong guys

  • @chr0min0id
    @chr0min0id 3 ปีที่แล้ว +651

    Erusians: **heavy breathing**

    • @erwinrommel5582
      @erwinrommel5582 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Haha lol I got that

    • @floridaemergencypics7261
      @floridaemergencypics7261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Ace combatttt lmao

    • @masonjia
      @masonjia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lolll

    • @kalpanaanubhav
      @kalpanaanubhav 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Go to hell

    • @kalpanaanubhav
      @kalpanaanubhav 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Look at how bad F 35 is. Compare that to Asia's Su 57, J 20, KF 21 Boramae , Asian century has begun

  • @CAL1MBO
    @CAL1MBO 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1733

    Nice combination of CGI and real footage.

    • @Locutus494
      @Locutus494 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      LOL yeah, morphing back and forth between an F-35C and a VMFAT-501 F-35B!

    • @marble25
      @marble25 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      the landing on the carrier was obvious

    • @Keepmywifesnameoutyafucknmouth
      @Keepmywifesnameoutyafucknmouth 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Fuck you Jeremy Clarkson

    • @TrashMutt
      @TrashMutt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      PapaBless why tho

    • @freddymendez3655
      @freddymendez3655 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You opened my eyes lol

  • @ferretzim8694
    @ferretzim8694 4 ปีที่แล้ว +496

    "The Arsenal Bird extends the enemy's air cover. We need to take them out if we are to retake the space elevator"

  • @brianholmes1812
    @brianholmes1812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +252

    TH-cam algorithm: "wanna watch a promo video for a naval drone from 2 years ago?"
    Me: "no.... but I will anyway"

  • @undeadafro4933
    @undeadafro4933 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2120

    Ace Combat fanbase: "Hey, I've seen this one."
    Lockheed:" What are you talking about?, it's brand new."

    • @WalrusWinking
      @WalrusWinking 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Ace Combat took that from this

    • @arronross0418
      @arronross0418 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Lmao the nazi’s did it first
      ( Ho 229 V3 )

    • @weasle2904
      @weasle2904 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@arronross0418 That is not the same thing at all, and in fact there were many flying wing designs before then.

    • @alexanderrahl482
      @alexanderrahl482 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Back to the future reference.+10

    • @justuseodysee7348
      @justuseodysee7348 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Rage Quit but they were AFAIK first ones to make jet flying wing design

  • @leeninfxstb
    @leeninfxstb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    This is amazing to see. I worked on this and similar concepts during my time at NASA as a wind tunnel technician. I love seeing stuff on which I've worked coming into reality and use in the present!

    • @FarmerDrew
      @FarmerDrew ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for your dedication

    • @gluecksdrache2054
      @gluecksdrache2054 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In combination with the fighter jets this will secure air superiority for the USA and NATO partners. 👍

  • @substuff3517
    @substuff3517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +399

    Entire Comment section: AC7 references
    Me: is anyone gonna talk about that carrier takeoff?

    • @TickyTack23
      @TickyTack23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Seriously, it's so cringy seeing the mass amounts of Ace Combat comments... Like I get it, it's in a video game, I don't knock people for playing video games, and getting all giddy over military tech... but it's just sad to see a big disconnect from reality. What I see from the video is a small refueling aircraft with autonomous capabilities, aiding in longer stealth surveillance missions.

    • @Logarithm906
      @Logarithm906 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @@TickyTack23 They're mostly doing it because it's funny. It's rather hilarious that a LM video on something they're obviously proud of has been taken over by comments about a similar thing in a computer game.
      Imagine if when Apple released the iPad all of the comments on their videos were "Great I can finally deliver my report to Captain Picard" or "Awesome, Starfleet had Padds in the late 80s!", or similar.
      It's just funny.

    • @michaelesposito2629
      @michaelesposito2629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Firebird that would only be funny because an iPad would be the first of its kind that even resembles a Star Trek pad. These comments are not funny.

    • @JRDShamrock
      @JRDShamrock 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@michaelesposito2629 you can TickyTack need to get a life and lighten up a little.

    • @michaelesposito2629
      @michaelesposito2629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      1018_josue yeah lol I need to get a life. Not the dozens and dozens of people making the same cringy comments

  • @jaken7447
    @jaken7447 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1903

    alright, when are u guys gonna make the arsenal bird?

    • @dominicviner6619
      @dominicviner6619 5 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      Funny thing is they tried many times during ww2. And cold war and even concepts in late 80s early 90s.
      I won't be surprised if it becomes a thing but it wouldn't like ace.
      Unless it cost like 45 billion. All those drones being able to dock mid flight fold it's wings while being less then a foot from another drone to the left or right..
      But there could be something. Having the ability to bring air cover to anywhere in the matter of hours is huge and the planes being able to do a full combat load

    • @bruce18703
      @bruce18703 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      😂😂😂

    • @finn5053
      @finn5053 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Poi~

    • @neoshot101
      @neoshot101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      expected

    • @CouchPotato252
      @CouchPotato252 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Look up the Lockheed CL-1201 study. Absolute unit.

  • @Zephyrine.Koritsuka
    @Zephyrine.Koritsuka 5 ปีที่แล้ว +721

    When did Lockheed Martin get into Ace Combat?

    • @crashbandicootnerd4321
      @crashbandicootnerd4321 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Oh my God, the Ace Combat comments are killing me XD

    • @noahnishimura2967
      @noahnishimura2967 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      When did ace combat get into lockheed martin?

    • @Zephyrine.Koritsuka
      @Zephyrine.Koritsuka 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You Know Me
      Also a good question.

    • @fabriziodini5005
      @fabriziodini5005 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Right after they saw some photos of the horten 229

    • @mattyice2099
      @mattyice2099 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lol a long time ago

  • @evilboy3521
    @evilboy3521 4 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    Everyone keeps talking about Ace Combat 7 but is no one gonna acknowledge that Arma 3 Literally has the same drone, but BEFORE ace combat 7 and this was announced, and it too is also launched from a carrier.

    • @shayzanee9371
      @shayzanee9371 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes most of us know... But the fact that AC fan base was higher made it all this comment sections into cringey place... I like it xD

    • @PatrickRatman
      @PatrickRatman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      arma 3 was built with future military concepts in mind

    • @arberchabot8760
      @arberchabot8760 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ace combat 7 player base is bigger thats why

    • @rmm3803
      @rmm3803 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Who tf gives a sh*t when they were released, these are just games. You supposed to feel better that your game was released before theirs? Good grief!

    • @SalmonTooter
      @SalmonTooter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@arberchabot8760 arma 3 actually has a larger player base if I’m not mistaken

  • @devwreck192
    @devwreck192 6 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    This extends the operating range of our aircraft and subsequently keeps our carriers further away from land-based carrier killing technologies. Good idea.

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yeah. Thats actually a remarkbly good idea

  • @mastergecko1178
    @mastergecko1178 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2352

    Don’t even remember how many of those I shot down in Ace Combat 7

    • @sharonishere
      @sharonishere 5 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Lmao

    • @diabloxg2856
      @diabloxg2856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      LOL dude me too

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      30. Some are killed with the F-35C which is the manned stealth jet in the video.

    • @iraqarabgamesnetwork9747
      @iraqarabgamesnetwork9747 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      OMG😂😂😂😂😂

    • @許進曾
      @許進曾 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      MQ101 and MQ99 are a pain in the axx

  • @AthenaSaints
    @AthenaSaints 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    I am still waiting for Macross YF-21's mind controlled flexible material wing.

    • @sunny-sq6ci
      @sunny-sq6ci 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i believe DARPA actually r&d and field tested something like that. though that a few years back.

  • @kaadn18
    @kaadn18 5 ปีที่แล้ว +353

    How long til Erusea gets their hands on it?

    • @shanenonwolfe4109
      @shanenonwolfe4109 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      They will probably hack Osea and get blue prints

    • @DeNihility
      @DeNihility 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Like Iran did to one of those US drones?

    • @chrishaydt7354
      @chrishaydt7354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well then grab ur jet and I'll grab my f22 and figure it out for ourselves

    • @sovietslug8699
      @sovietslug8699 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      This video is a lie. This is Belkan technology.

    • @chrishaydt7354
      @chrishaydt7354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That erusea is going to steal

  • @quirk6272
    @quirk6272 5 ปีที่แล้ว +348

    That's a MQ-25 A forerunner for Arsenal bird!

    • @calamitousenigma9052
      @calamitousenigma9052 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      The big bird is coming, huh?

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      If it were to be deployed from the Arsenal bird it would be missing the pod which it uses to refuel the F-35C seen in this video.
      In that Scenario they would be carried under the arsenal bird and refuel a fleet of Erusean Military F-35C jets. Original intention would have been arsenal Bird MQ-25 & Osean Military F-35B & C jets this is due to the fact that the F-35a has a flying boom which is different from the probe and drogue system.
      For this drone in Strangreal Ace combat universe it should be Able to refuel Yuktobanian Su-27 flanker family jets Su-57 stealth jets Emmerian Navy F-18s & F-35C possibly Aurelian Navy YR-99 coffin equiped jets if Osea owns them but if Erusea uses them to would be their Military radical factions ally the Belkan Air force probe and drogue planes lastly Lesath & Estovakian probe and drogue planes like Su-33 Tornado GR1

    • @nova1726
      @nova1726 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quirk nah not really

    • @SUNKENSOCIETY
      @SUNKENSOCIETY 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hold on let’s make a bet, whoever guesses the next strategy wins, you can get in on this too bandog...

    • @thebuddy4517
      @thebuddy4517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *ace combat flashbacks*

  • @Great_America
    @Great_America 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    A tanker that has multi-role capabilities? Just WOW 😮

  • @ark14700
    @ark14700 5 ปีที่แล้ว +195

    1:09 If even one of the Arsenal Birds is shot down, their range of defence would be significantly reduced.

    • @raihanrizki2207
      @raihanrizki2207 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Without president harling, arsenal bird aren't exist

    • @SUNKENSOCIETY
      @SUNKENSOCIETY 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I salute the pilot who gave us all the future..

    • @neptunium_239
      @neptunium_239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SUNKENSOCIETY today was the day the moment of her return

    • @mystyle_jm8997
      @mystyle_jm8997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What about the Second Arkbird, that Nagase mentioned in White Bird Part II?

  • @andrewberg9611
    @andrewberg9611 5 ปีที่แล้ว +223

    Damn what did the pilot of that 35 do to get four strikes?

    • @keterduty6294
      @keterduty6294 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Probably something bad

    • @Accentaur
      @Accentaur 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      "Can you hear me, pilot with the Four Strikes?"

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Probably something wrong and remember these drones aren't supposed to be used with steam catapult because too fragile for used with them. They're designed to work well with electromagnetic catapults since I watch the Science Channel documentary about the Gerald Ford class aircraft carrier. For Ace Combat 8 these KQ-25s should be in Osean Naval Air arm service against Belkan Air Force or Verusean military from their own Gerald Ford class carriers provides does Lockheed Martin us Department of Defense does allow Kono's Project aces team Bandai Namco on one.

    • @andrewberg9611
      @andrewberg9611 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@EpicThe112 Okay? Not exactly the question.

    • @parsat8294
      @parsat8294 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Tax evasion. You cheat the IRS they throw you in with 444

  • @eric97909
    @eric97909 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I like how the suggested music is Sweet Victory as played in Spongebob

  • @quantomic1106
    @quantomic1106 6 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    What's the range of the Bluetooth in this thing? Is it comparable with IOS?
    Thanks!

    • @alostbaron781
      @alostbaron781 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yes

    • @surekhakhole525
      @surekhakhole525 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol

    • @wrchung
      @wrchung 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I hear it works with Alexa.

    • @julius855
      @julius855 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It works as long as the arsenal bird is in range

    • @Splashdavap
      @Splashdavap 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao

  • @deep.space.12
    @deep.space.12 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    The central engine intake looks extremely intimidating! Love it!

  • @AntonioVivaldi1678
    @AntonioVivaldi1678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My dad is a contractor for a company that designs things for the Air Force. I don’t know what he does for it, but I have heard him say MQ-25 a lot over the phone.

  • @gundermifflin4606
    @gundermifflin4606 5 ปีที่แล้ว +421

    That’s it! To many AC7 references, SOLITARY!

  • @AITF045
    @AITF045 5 ปีที่แล้ว +448

    Belka did nothing wrong guys

    • @diabloxg2856
      @diabloxg2856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Douglas Ito AITF ace combat fan will agree with you LOL
      #BELKADIDNOTHINGWRONG

    • @pablo17667140
      @pablo17667140 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      absolutely nothing wrong

    • @Spacebaryonyx
      @Spacebaryonyx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      AITF bElka did everything wRong

    • @crist-ot8oo
      @crist-ot8oo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Spacebaryonyx solitary now

    • @Anthony-fr5om
      @Anthony-fr5om 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactlyyyy

  • @lyndazazanis7636
    @lyndazazanis7636 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This one is a real beauty
    My Dad worked at Lockheed Palmdale and I was so privileged to be able to sit in the pilot's seat of an SR-71 and to
    this day it's my favorite
    Plane in the world

  • @Kyontheotakugamer
    @Kyontheotakugamer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +784

    ace combat 7 brought me here

    • @zeus1hunter963
      @zeus1hunter963 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Same

    • @allanbel6269
      @allanbel6269 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Well mq99 are much more a threat

    • @johndaltrocanto
      @johndaltrocanto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Not to mention ADF-11F

    • @dreadnought-ai
      @dreadnought-ai 5 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Lockheed Martin going to make the Arsenal bird now lol

    • @nickshaffer80
      @nickshaffer80 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Arsenal Bird when, DARPA?

  • @Airguardian
    @Airguardian 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1212

    Nice renders!

    • @Chandrabrahmos
      @Chandrabrahmos 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Airguardian Yes, indeed! That’s the first thing that came to my mind too.

    • @sithjohn80
      @sithjohn80 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lol

    • @Repented008
      @Repented008 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Airguardian This should inspire you to change your profile pic.

    • @tienhanus
      @tienhanus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Airguardian =))

    • @Airguardian
      @Airguardian 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Change profile pic, why? I love flankers, they are beautiful! :D

  • @linkdude64
    @linkdude64 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wasn't sure if these refueler planes were the right choice for my personal aircraft carrier, but after seeing this video, I think I'm reconsidering.

  • @apophisstr6719
    @apophisstr6719 5 ปีที่แล้ว +277

    How many Belkan citizens did u hired?

    • @grievouslytired7886
      @grievouslytired7886 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      "They say the Belkans are known for their conspiracies."

    • @nore5992
      @nore5992 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Grunder Industries.....

    • @rijalitijezaimbecile9085
      @rijalitijezaimbecile9085 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Belkans???

    • @DonVigaDeFierro
      @DonVigaDeFierro 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Just the Grey Men.
      Ayy lmao.

    • @finnmurtons8727
      @finnmurtons8727 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      "Lockheed Martin? More like South Osea Gründer Industries."

  • @yinranzhang1908
    @yinranzhang1908 6 ปีที่แล้ว +419

    All is fun and game until your client asks how much it cost

    • @yinranzhang1908
      @yinranzhang1908 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So I don't think that the US air force will place their order any time soon

    • @jeremychase7416
      @jeremychase7416 6 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      Yinran Zhang The United States doesn't care how much money they funnel to these bastards. Then they'll create 3 new wars just to use it.

    • @yinranzhang1908
      @yinranzhang1908 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      US finance is not as strong as you think

    • @jeremychase7416
      @jeremychase7416 6 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      Yinran Zhang The United States will always find money for war.

    • @chadgrimes5119
      @chadgrimes5119 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      700 billion military fund for this year

  • @operatorscorpion3571
    @operatorscorpion3571 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Me: it's the 700th time I've seen that drone.
    Lockheed Martin: Wdym? It's brand new!
    Me: *Arsenal Bird and MQ-101s intensifies*

  • @Accentaur
    @Accentaur 5 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    I see S̶o̶u̶t̶h̶ ̶B̶e̶l̶k̶a̶ ̶M̶u̶n̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶F̶a̶c̶t̶o̶r̶y̶ North Osea Gründer Industries is going places.

    • @Accentaur
      @Accentaur 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Then you are a Belkan patriot.

    • @nethascotx24
      @nethascotx24 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Belka did everything wrong, may they burn with their Burke’s

  • @Unplay4ble
    @Unplay4ble 5 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    Where’s my Morgan?

    • @finnmurtons8727
      @finnmurtons8727 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Still in the works. They'll let you know when it's ready so you can steal it.

    • @ryanadiprayoga6016
      @ryanadiprayoga6016 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      *Yo Buddy intensified*

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      good question and that would be easy if Lockheed Martin has a video game division then they can collaborate with Bandai Namco for the blueprints then transfer to the aviation division for actual Manufacturing

    • @listeed6532
      @listeed6532 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You and I, we're like the opposite sides of the same coin.

    • @ryanadiprayoga6016
      @ryanadiprayoga6016 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Here come the snow

  • @d3f4l72
    @d3f4l72 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    laughs in Hugin, Munin, and Zoe

  • @jhyman2774
    @jhyman2774 6 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    0:38 that dab tho

    • @Crankiebox99
      @Crankiebox99 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Internet User lol

    • @jiska111111111111111
      @jiska111111111111111 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      He didnt tho

    • @jiska111111111111111
      @jiska111111111111111 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @DogePlays - GTA, Fortnite & More! Lol gtfo w your stupid reddit r/ sht
      I know the joke but as i just looked closer i didnt rlly look like a dab anymore thats all kid

    • @Fp.Lyrical
      @Fp.Lyrical 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Red boy but he almost tho

    • @BosleyBeats
      @BosleyBeats 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s hilarious

  • @baderq8ty99
    @baderq8ty99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    the navalized MQ-101 looks great

  • @koopanique
    @koopanique 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    2:15 that F-35 just warped to another timeline

  • @slashusr
    @slashusr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    The guys and gals at the Skunk Works have done so much for our country. They have the right stuff that America is made of.

    • @govenmentassassin
      @govenmentassassin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Robert Ruork I love the military, planes in particular, but they are the reason why we can't get out of debt. The price tag on just one stealth machine is astronomical.

    • @aljohnson3717
      @aljohnson3717 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      govenmentassassin if you refuse to feed your army, you will have to feed your enemy’s army
      America is the ONLY force for good in this world. Unfortunately we are the only adult in the room
      I am former Russian and now A Proud American Citizen. I hate Putin and I support my beloved America.

    • @spaghetti7782
      @spaghetti7782 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I don't like Putin either but neither do most people in Russia right now. The United States' government goes against the will of the people right now and I would think it's the same way in Russia right now. And by calling the US the only force for good you are forgetting all allied or neutral countries.

    • @moritzmauler423
      @moritzmauler423 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Except the concept for this type of plane is from germany

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea CGI won't do much in real combat though.

  • @sinisterisrandom8537
    @sinisterisrandom8537 5 ปีที่แล้ว +310

    DO i see a Modern Ho-229 but without guns
    making it like the Japanese long range bomber meant to carry fuel from WW2
    Yes

    • @teod1298
      @teod1298 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Modern 229? That POS wasn't the first flying wing aircraft. Jack Northrop had so many variants, including working models while the 229 couldn't even fly. With your logic, every new attack helicopter must be a modernized apache

    • @marshall_nl9204
      @marshall_nl9204 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Lol just commented that it reminded me of the ho-229

    • @johnnycruiser2846
      @johnnycruiser2846 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Do I see a modern airplane? It has 2 wings and an engine. It looks like a modern airplane!

    • @Alte.Kameraden
      @Alte.Kameraden 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@teod1298 You're forgetting a key detail that kept Northrop Flying Wing Aircraft struggled with up until the B2 and why only one bomber flying wing ever was adopted, despite the advantages such a design could yield. Northrop was never able to figure out how to keep these aircraft stable in the air when there was a lack of a Rudder. Meaning Northrop flying wing aircraft were limited, heavily limited on how they can fly, and operate. N-1M is a good example, it could not yaw, could not roll to it's sides either. All it could do was prove you could fly an aircraft without a vertical stabilizer, but not in a fashion that would make it practical for anything...... This problem would plague Northrop's flying wing designs with only the B2 ever solving it. This includes the YB-35, by the time the YB-49 came along Northrop were pretty much forced to put stabilizers and rudders on their flying wings, making them not "True" flying wings.
      This is a problem that the Norten Brothers actually solved, one that Northrop overlooked. Norten brothers basically decided to use air breaks to provide the necessary effect that a rudder would normally provide similar to what you would see in a Dauntless Dive Bomber with flaps that opened on the backside of the wings up and down together, at different degrees attached to the foot peddles normally associated with the rudder. Though for the Ho229 they functioned similar to dive breaks on a Me410. But they were what was used to make it simulate having a rudder.
      This gave a pilot a good amount of "Yaw" control, something Northrop designs lacked. This allowed the Norten design to perform, roll, and yaw, something Northrop flying wings could not do, until the B2 Stealth Bomber, which is the only major design by Northrop that Incorporated this feature. Northrop actually sent engineers to look at the Ho229 to see what the heck the Norten company did that gave the Ho229 the ability to do this, something over looked when it was first evaluated decades prior after it was captured. Sadly this has caused a misconception that Northrop copied the Ho229 because of it's stealth characteristics. When that is far from the truth, as it mostly had to do with trying to make a stable flying wing that didn't have an Stabilizer or Rudder, something the Ho229 had but no other Northrop designs achieved. Without being able to make the B2 a stable aircraft without a Rudder/stabilizer it would never be able to be stealthy in the fashion Northrop wanted, the Ho229's yaw controls however were a solution to that problem.
      So sure, Northrop got the first flying wings in the air, but they were not good aircraft, not until their 1950 designs. Ho229 was decades ahead of it's time because of something as simple as it's ability to yaw proper. Half a century ahead of Northrop's flying wing designs because of a similar innovation that made it better than what Northrop built. It's similar to how the F-14 used the frontal wing slats similar to what was introduced in the BF109B (1936, first aircraft to have forward wing slats that deployed automatically at specific air speeds) that no one else used which provides increased left at slower air speeds taking a concept design introduces decades prior to give a modern aircraft an edge. PS a lot of people copied the BF109's frontal wing slats during WWII but during the early Jet age the concept was too fragile for high speed jets. F-14 is the best modernish example I can think of that it was reintroduced successfully.

    • @nfldend501
      @nfldend501 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is it stealth

  • @Unicorns115
    @Unicorns115 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So when are you guys gonna start working on the X-02s Strike Wyvern

  • @userbosco
    @userbosco 6 ปีที่แล้ว +289

    Cool, now please try not to crash one in Iran...again.

    • @dave_riots
      @dave_riots 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      userbosco It didn't actually crash in Iran, it had been commandeered by the Iranians and they landed it.

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Israel has captured Iran's RQ-170 clone www.defensenews.com/global/mideast-africa/2018/02/12/israel-air-force-says-seized-iranian-drone-is-a-knockoff-of-us-sentinel/
      Israel can shoot down Iran's near useless stealth RQ-170 knockoff.

    • @GM-xk1nw
      @GM-xk1nw 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      no they can't

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Died, Israel can shoot down Iran's near useless stealth RQ-170 knockoff.

    • @juniorslothsix5562
      @juniorslothsix5562 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      More like ty not to let it get hacked

  • @erikhjortsater5461
    @erikhjortsater5461 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Man! I haven’t got this new update to Ace Combat 7 yet!

  • @Burboss
    @Burboss 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    This is cool thing about CGI - everything looks so real, even it aint't

    • @kishascape
      @kishascape 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      *meanwhile at the area 51 hangar*

    • @Burboss
      @Burboss 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kishascape yeah. and some still believe in Santa

    • @coughingpenguin4346
      @coughingpenguin4346 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ye

    • @TheJackHood
      @TheJackHood 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It doesn't look that good

    • @JCIIIBULLET
      @JCIIIBULLET 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This ain't real?
      ..these aircraft have been real for at least 10 or 20 years before people ever talked about or seen anything lol, but I digress:)

  • @yeaiamtrill
    @yeaiamtrill 5 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    try making mq 99s and 101s instead

    • @chrishaydt7354
      @chrishaydt7354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And an unmanned aerial aircraft carrier that is a giant wing that can hold both drones instead of just mq101s, f u erusia

    • @chrishaydt7354
      @chrishaydt7354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ignore the fact I misspelled erusea

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mq-99 is actually a Boeing Australia product in real life

    • @許進曾
      @許進曾 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EpicThe112 named the mq58

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@許進曾 XQ-58 is the Correct designation for the American MQ-101.

  • @christopherhalim2801
    @christopherhalim2801 5 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    MQ-101 + Arsenal Bird
    When?

    • @raihanrizki2207
      @raihanrizki2207 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It will, but with president harling first

    • @Saviliana
      @Saviliana 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I want Ark Bird instead, Arsenal bird is too weak.

  • @ilmarilah1195
    @ilmarilah1195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The animators for this did a good job nothing mind blowing but still a good job

  • @andrewzheng4038
    @andrewzheng4038 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Damn the AC7 dlc looking dank

  • @j.c.v3176
    @j.c.v3176 6 ปีที่แล้ว +472

    Looks like a modern Ho. 229!!

    • @markanthony4655
      @markanthony4655 6 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      Exactly what I was thinking. The Germans at the time may have been the enemy, but some of their designs were brilliant.

    • @easternwind4435
      @easternwind4435 6 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      allmost all of modern warfare is based on german ww2 technology.

    • @j.c.v3176
      @j.c.v3176 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish the sysytem was too

    • @Followerofchrist2091
      @Followerofchrist2091 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      the ho 229 wasn't designed like this to be stealthy it was designed like that out of wood and mesh to be slimmer and faster.

    • @JohnDoe-ee6qs
      @JohnDoe-ee6qs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ShufflebotUPonYOU it was designed to be stealthy too, the Smithsonian and some tv documentary team had a life sized one built to test it's radar cross section and it was an extremely stealthy aircraft.

  • @MBCGRS
    @MBCGRS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Horten brothers would be smiling. Finally someone built their design.

  • @dreamliner9640
    @dreamliner9640 6 ปีที่แล้ว +318

    Yeah lockheed Martin

    • @pinemartenemily9482
      @pinemartenemily9482 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lop-eared martin

    • @ohmanyourecool1
      @ohmanyourecool1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Robco industries > Lockheed Martin

    • @ohmanyourecool1
      @ohmanyourecool1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      General Atomics > Northrop Grumman
      Don't + me. Change my mind.

    • @OscarHernandez-js3pk
      @OscarHernandez-js3pk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I live down the street from them ❤ always wake up to the sounds of b2's in the morning ☕

  • @roosterblaster5557
    @roosterblaster5557 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Now it’s time to build the arsenal bird

  • @colonelcrockett2250
    @colonelcrockett2250 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awww but the lovely little cockpit conversations

  • @scotchsoda3165
    @scotchsoda3165 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Now just need Drone Missile Carriers. The tactics in my mind are endless!
    Drone AWAC's too, with data feeds channeled to where it's needed.

    • @RhodesianBushmaster
      @RhodesianBushmaster 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can't turn everything into a drone. Remember the US-Iranian Sentinel incident?

  • @pornchaiphan6880
    @pornchaiphan6880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    Well done... Lockheed Martin

    • @AngelLestat2
      @AngelLestat2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      you must be the lockheed martin CEO, the only crazy that can said that.

    • @pornchaiphan6880
      @pornchaiphan6880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not necessary. Most people who see with their eyes and use the mind to know is true.

    • @AngelLestat2
      @AngelLestat2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      those are your taxes the ones that are stealing.. not mine..

    • @pornchaiphan6880
      @pornchaiphan6880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The complexity of threat must be covered by budget. Just like you have a gun at home to use it at a critical time.

    • @AngelLestat2
      @AngelLestat2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      tell me.. how much it cost this project and what are the benefits?

  • @jerrymccrae7202
    @jerrymccrae7202 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love this idea! Its simple and cheap and does a great duty!

    • @vibhanshuchauhan3328
      @vibhanshuchauhan3328 ปีที่แล้ว

      it is 100 million dollar drone but cheap for american standard

  • @glitchjockey6551
    @glitchjockey6551 5 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    No Arsenal Bird?
    *”You! Solitary now!”*

  • @billybobjohnadamjoe
    @billybobjohnadamjoe 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I’m most curious to see how much fuel it can actually store as a tanker, and how (overall) that’d contribute to keeping planes up in the air.

  • @crimsontyphoon1030
    @crimsontyphoon1030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Truly the next step in military aviation.

  • @superbehemothboy02
    @superbehemothboy02 5 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Waiting for the day when the arsenal bird from AC7 will be a legit thing...

    • @Saviliana
      @Saviliana 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And before they even have lay down the first cable, we will have a Stonehenge before anything.

    • @mightymonster9034
      @mightymonster9034 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Already is, military has plans to use the boeing 747 as a flying aircraft carrier. Could launch and reclaim drones mid flight.

    • @sta5011
      @sta5011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Saviliana Or a literal parody of it

  • @muhithossain7312
    @muhithossain7312 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    So is this the precursor to the Arsenal Bird?

  • @haryredneck
    @haryredneck 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love how these pop into my feed like I'm some kind of costumer. Yea I'll take three of these to refill my accord.

  • @keterduty6294
    @keterduty6294 5 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    When yall gonna make that ADFX-01 morgan

    • @2ia26_rakhaamanta4
      @2ia26_rakhaamanta4 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When are you gonna stop Bright from taking all the Chainsaws

    • @keterduty6294
      @keterduty6294 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@2ia26_rakhaamanta4 not my problem it the 05 problem

    • @2ia26_rakhaamanta4
      @2ia26_rakhaamanta4 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@keterduty6294 true true, but they seriously need to restrain bright from it

    • @keterduty6294
      @keterduty6294 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@2ia26_rakhaamanta4 well... Just let it slide

    • @calamitousenigma9052
      @calamitousenigma9052 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@keterduty6294 just make sure awwnb doesn't get their filthy paws on it

  • @Sonjaslostson
    @Sonjaslostson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Not a bad idea. Drones can be set on an autonomous flight path with zero chance of pilot fatique while being small makes them harder to shoot down. Losing a tanker is never easy. Even with all the problems I have with drones, this is a perfect role for UAVs. Bravo, Lockheed Martin.

  • @chuintwo1174
    @chuintwo1174 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    you are master lockheed martin! you have always exceeded all my expectations my lord!

  • @slashusr
    @slashusr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +400

    For my birthday I want...

    • @sandm4n
      @sandm4n 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Robert Ruork GET THIS MAN A MQ-25!

    • @michaelc.4321
      @michaelc.4321 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Robert Ruork what the hell would you do with it though?

    • @breakafreak
      @breakafreak 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Random stuff with Michael air refuel his car

    • @Gilbertory
      @Gilbertory 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Alec DiIenno
      🤤😂

    • @MrEtherShot
      @MrEtherShot 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Robert Ruork sex change and 🍪

  • @shadowteam9943
    @shadowteam9943 5 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    [Osean Fighter-1] “Man these are sure a step above the last drones!”

    • @TheReaper08_
      @TheReaper08_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hahaha

    • @ЗиятЗият-к2ч
      @ЗиятЗият-к2ч 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Хххххээхэээххээхххххзххххххххххэээххэээхээхэхэххххххххххххххххххх

    • @dsleurink7052
      @dsleurink7052 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheReaper08_ iii7

  • @buck3336
    @buck3336 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Funny how you guys come up with spectacular looking beast of a machine and couple countries we all know who instantly come out with a look alike. I have always wonder how well these UAVs could actually perform in actual combat like Boeing's "wingman" project.

    • @haparcheledupwar
      @haparcheledupwar ปีที่แล้ว

      You will never know because your just an average youtuber and citizen

  • @mrdriver2988
    @mrdriver2988 5 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    When the American military finds out about ace combate.

    • @kishascape
      @kishascape 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Can't wait for the bigger flying aircraft carrier version.

    • @royalteluis623
      @royalteluis623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kishascape they tried making a giant flying nuclear carrier in the 70s

    • @sta5011
      @sta5011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kishascape I mean.. They did try one which was the 747 carrier but failed

  • @adamsshafiqq
    @adamsshafiqq 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Solitary. NOW!

  • @KazenoniKakuremi
    @KazenoniKakuremi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Air refueling via long range high capacity drone is a game changer... It removes navy depends on availability of airforce infrastructure and refueling tankers

  • @Spudtron98
    @Spudtron98 5 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    (Sees flying wing design)
    "DAE think it's a Ho-229?????"
    Honestly, people, use your heads. You may as well think that a Spitfire's directly related to an Eagle.

    • @mandernachluca3774
      @mandernachluca3774 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly, i mean, the Ho 229 had ,beyond every other difference,
      obviously 2 engines, not one like this design.

    • @areaofdefect907
      @areaofdefect907 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Except the basic aerodynamic principles are much closer than between a Spitfire and an F15 but hey whatever means you can show how much smarter you are than people.

    • @mandernachluca3774
      @mandernachluca3774 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@areaofdefect907
      Yeah, his comparsion is a bit overkill but he still has a point. You can Ho 229 as much as you want but this modern day drone has nothing to do with it, except the aerodynamic principles.

    • @areaofdefect907
      @areaofdefect907 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@mandernachluca3774 Yeah I get that they're not actually that similar and I'm not saying they are, it's just the comment comes across as very high and mighty when there are good reasons to see a resemblance. I guess we have War Thunder to blame for everyone knowing about the Horten now :P

    • @mandernachluca3774
      @mandernachluca3774 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@areaofdefect907
      Well, my guess is that he could be a bit pissed. I'm not even judging him for that, these comments saying that this drone looks like the Horten is what gets people into making fun of every single technological oddity of the germans and calling everyone a whereaboo that essentially tries to explain them that these oddities mad sense from the perspective of the germans. Maybe that was the reason for the slightly high and mighty' ish comment.

  • @LoganRob69
    @LoganRob69 6 ปีที่แล้ว +157

    Anyone else think it looks just like the horten 229?

    • @Crankiebox99
      @Crankiebox99 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Concorde ja

    • @gingeabredguy8070
      @gingeabredguy8070 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kinda

    • @crunchymix
      @crunchymix 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It look more like N-1M.

    • @spaky1954
      @spaky1954 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I bet we used their plans from it and improved upon it.

    • @dankziq5435
      @dankziq5435 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I smell german engineering

  • @AviationApple
    @AviationApple 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    these lights look so cool on this plane.

  • @aliceWT
    @aliceWT 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    taget confirm, target is mq-101

    • @johnconner9149
      @johnconner9149 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The for runner for the Arsenal Bird

  • @Ie0n1
    @Ie0n1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Absolutely beautiful

  • @SRDPS2
    @SRDPS2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    0:04 MQ-101, That you?
    Lockheed
    : A development group that make all ACE COMBAT Thing is real.

  • @cameronwick
    @cameronwick 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for releasing this type of stuff. i know its not meant for the public so much as part of a bunch of info you use for investors and clients and whatnot, but just to be able to see some of the the more interesting aspects of these projects is really neat.
    How cool would it have been if back in the SR-71 days we were getting TH-cam videos of renders and shit like that. Good on ya LM.

  • @gonietubenyc5741
    @gonietubenyc5741 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you Lockheed !! And American company that together with Boeing Insures that the United States 🇺🇸 holds air superiority and ground superiority

    • @lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239
      @lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Superiority.lol.18 year fighting with walking people.not only never Wong a fight.comeback home crazy like a cow.lol

    • @GowthamNatarajanAI
      @GowthamNatarajanAI 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239 What nonsense are you talking about?

    • @lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239
      @lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GowthamNatarajanAI do you read or not

    • @GowthamNatarajanAI
      @GowthamNatarajanAI 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239 Where is US fighting for 18 years? In Afghanistan and Iraq? That has got nothing to do with military power. US is trying to rebuild and maintain peace and struggling with it. It has got nothing to do with the power of the military.

    • @lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239
      @lisandromanuelhidalgoruz3239 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GowthamNatarajanAI peace you say.if you got power like you say u control anything.u got power with country like siria.what about China Russian and india.show me your power

  • @stephenhill1716
    @stephenhill1716 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes people, everything in Ace Combat exists in some way shape or form.

  • @ziggy8190
    @ziggy8190 6 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Looks like a modern Ho 229 designed for tanker duties

    • @deathtrooper199
      @deathtrooper199 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It seems like it wanted to fly freely otherwise, performed better roles, just to fulfill his decedent HO 229's unfulfilled purpose.

    • @coryfice1881
      @coryfice1881 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a Jet not a glider.

  • @aerohk
    @aerohk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Very pretty LED lights. Winner.

  • @CanadianGamer.01
    @CanadianGamer.01 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So glad they're putting light up arrows on the front so people can see what it's doing!

  • @Lucas-wj8kl
    @Lucas-wj8kl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Lol the faces of those innocent viewers who read strangereal comments.

  • @TheRibbonRed
    @TheRibbonRed 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    1. Can take off and land on a carrier all by itself.
    2. Can refuel mid-air all by itself.
    3. Capable of delivering payload to a target.
    US Navy: “We don’t trust it enough.”
    Turned into a flying tanker.
    Well done. I suppose the very least this project could do is to not get terminated and found other applications-even though it is capable for more than what it immediately received.

    • @Locutus494
      @Locutus494 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Did you watch the video? Do you have any knowledge of the UCLASS program's objectives? Obviously not. Buddy refueling is just one of the role requirements of this program.

    • @damianm-nordhorn116
      @damianm-nordhorn116 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Firstly there are attack and surveillance drones out there already and tanking is extremely important.
      Secondly, if they're not gonna use it for other purposes from day one already, it's convenient to use it as a tanker first and check it's reliability (probably especially regarding carrier landing) before you load them with more expensive and secret equipment.
      I'd assume they're no dummies.

    • @TheRibbonRed
      @TheRibbonRed 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Locutus494 I watched the whole video. That’s why I’m commenting, because they downplayed the UCLASS program’s combat purposes and overtly repeated the “buddy tanking” capabilities of the former-to-be X-47B. No need to be offensive.
      Damian here provided a nice point that I overlooked without claiming that I know nothing of the program’s objectives (which the decision to merely relegate it as a buddy tanker was controversial after the X-47B proved to be fully capable autonomously-which also might have a hand in Northrop withdrawing from the program).
      I doubt that the MQ-25 would ever demonstrate its combat capabilities when assigned as an air tanker, but perhaps that day might come.

    • @damianm-nordhorn116
      @damianm-nordhorn116 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TheRibbonRed
      It's only a marketing video after all ;)
      Remember how loads of people were bashing the F-35? .. And now most of NATO orders it.
      They'll test and evaluate this one and analyze current and future needs and then decide.
      And while it doesn't look like THE f FUTURE ATTACK DRONE (carrying weapons outside and not 'stealthy'), NATO partners without tanker fleets might be interested in this product.

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      US Navy has a point however. Newer things need time to prove itselfs reliability

  • @professordanfurmanek3732
    @professordanfurmanek3732 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Way to go Lockheed! Also time to put some of this engineering Magic into competing more heavily in the private company space vehicle Market!

  • @jeremyjohn8199
    @jeremyjohn8199 6 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    The German Hortem Ho is the great grand daddy for all these planes

    • @damianm-nordhorn116
      @damianm-nordhorn116 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Jeremy John
      'Nurflügler'? Nature had proved this concept long before ;)
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batoidea

    • @williamchamberlain2263
      @williamchamberlain2263 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Damian Müller-Nordhorn and en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alsomitra_macrocarpa

    • @dillydilly3680
      @dillydilly3680 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Look up the N9M and N1M

    • @thefreeman8791
      @thefreeman8791 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      And the American Wright brothers made the first ancestor of all aircraft.

    • @damianm-nordhorn116
      @damianm-nordhorn116 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Billy Slo
      This is about the flying wing concept. Also the Wright brothers weren't first.

  • @riphopfer5816
    @riphopfer5816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is beautiful! Excellent concept, excellent mission objective. It’s funny; I was just thinking that standard KC-135 tankers will be in grave danger in future air wars that involve extending the native range of the F-22/F-35 over non-allied airspace.

    • @georgepantazis141
      @georgepantazis141 ปีที่แล้ว

      They do have countermeasures kC-135 and Protection by fighter escorts.🇦🇺🇺🇦

  • @FrathouseMouse
    @FrathouseMouse 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Never forget who we are working for"
    *salute*

  • @jeanvaljean7154
    @jeanvaljean7154 6 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    1 trillion dollars later...

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      F-35 program hasn't reach "1 trillion dollars". Try again.
      "1 trillion dollars" is for the life of F-35 program with 56 years and four digit unit numbers.

    • @utkarshadhikari5525
      @utkarshadhikari5525 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rnl Valen it has crossed over 100 billion mark though and nowhere near ready and teething with issues

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      HITESH Adhikari
      F-35A has reached Block 3F status.
      F-35B and F-35C are still progressing their Block 3F status.

    • @utkarshadhikari5525
      @utkarshadhikari5525 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rnl Valen u realise that no one other than Israeli f35 have seen combat and that too because they modify their systems.
      Also the 200 previously built jets are already obsolete as they don't support upgrades and cost of upgrading them is more than building new one

    • @bar5167
      @bar5167 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Usa have mony not like russia

  • @kainevittulainen
    @kainevittulainen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    No one told me that Lockheed Martin merged with the South Belkan Munitions Factory...

  • @kyrie26
    @kyrie26 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    “Carrier-suitable” needs the hyphen, otherwise the carrier is suitable.

    • @D.b._Lord
      @D.b._Lord 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Man that carrier is looking nice in that suit

  • @bloodaid
    @bloodaid 5 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Why was this recommended to me?
    It's an ad of a highly militarized drone.
    I couldn't buy this even if I could afford it.

    • @GekkoSeven
      @GekkoSeven 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      lol

    • @HuntingTarg
      @HuntingTarg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because algorithms aren't always right?

    • @antares3171
      @antares3171 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm buying one anyway. Screw the rules, I have a drone.

    • @kishascape
      @kishascape 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just what I needed for my MQ-9 Reaper to fly forever!

  • @daddiodizzle8990
    @daddiodizzle8990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    "There will always be a human in the response chain."
    Uh, hunh.

    • @TheSkyGuy77
      @TheSkyGuy77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sitting at a computer desk

  • @googleaccount6761
    @googleaccount6761 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    31 years and then I retired.. now they come out with the good toys..damn!

  • @flapflapflapflap
    @flapflapflapflap 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I fear no man
    But that thing
    *MQ-25*
    It scares me

  • @fpcxenos3788
    @fpcxenos3788 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ho229 is that you 80 years later?

  • @grahamvirgil
    @grahamvirgil 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great looking plane ! Way to go Skunk !

  • @DeanXiety-yp8ie
    @DeanXiety-yp8ie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    yess... another flying boomerang !!!