Boeing had one problem then after that every maintenance issue and fault was scrutinized. It’s all overhyped media bull fueled by the lust of clicks and views.
Mo 65 insansız hava yakıt ikmal siha tasarımi olarak yaptım burun kısmına 700kw lazer topu entegre ettim kanat kisimina iki yanına 800kw lazer topu entegre ettim kanat kisimina iki iki yakıt transfer kiki entegre ettim tank savar füze entegre ettim insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak
With all due respect, the MQ-25 is another example of a program that was designed very poorly by the Navy. It wasn't required to have a big enough fuel load to refuel the f-35, only the F/A-18 super hornet
The MQ-25's fuel capacity is almost exactly that of the F-35, but unless something has gone terribly wrong, planes aren't running on fumes when they refuel. The Stingray is capable of topping off four to six F-35s or F-18s at a range of 520 miles from the carrier.
When I see renderings, I always think of it as a cute little bayraktar-2 size drone, but the shot at 0:48 shows how big the MQ-25 is.
...that is a gorgeous airframe
It will be a nice addition to our Navy.
This & the xq-58 valkyrie will extend capabilities
Add 10 years and double the cost!
I’m sure it’s a great product, just like pretty much everything Boeing makes nowadays 😂
Boeing had one problem then after that every maintenance issue and fault was scrutinized. It’s all overhyped media bull fueled by the lust of clicks and views.
Even Iran makes superior drones than this lol!
@@deltaboy2011 bruh, that’s taking it too far… Boeing ain’t THAT crappy.. at least not yet!
@@deltaboy2011 you mean all the ones that got shot down the other day lol?
Dunno, feel like all new tankers would be better $$ option, realistically how much fuel can that drone carry? Yeah it needs a new mission
Different use cases though, regular tankers can not take off aircraft carriers
@@map3158then why not a high aspect ratio flying wing that folds? Can carry more, lower takeoff speed,etc
@@smallpeople172 That is more of a question for the US Navy, not me 😅
Offloads 16,000 lb fuel at a 500 mile mission radius.
Didn't you watch the video? They said its fuel capacity.
Mo 65 insansız hava yakıt ikmal siha tasarımi olarak yaptım burun kısmına 700kw lazer topu entegre ettim kanat kisimina iki yanına 800kw lazer topu entegre ettim kanat kisimina iki iki yakıt transfer kiki entegre ettim tank savar füze entegre ettim insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak
With all due respect, the MQ-25 is another example of a program that was designed very poorly by the Navy. It wasn't required to have a big enough fuel load to refuel the f-35, only the F/A-18 super hornet
The MQ-25's fuel capacity is almost exactly that of the F-35, but unless something has gone terribly wrong, planes aren't running on fumes when they refuel. The Stingray is capable of topping off four to six F-35s or F-18s at a range of 520 miles from the carrier.
This & the xq-58 valkyrie will extend capabilities
This & the xq-58 valkyrie will extend capabilities
This & the xq-58 valkyrie will extend capabilities