@yetanotherdude3955 the laws of physics apply . You couldn't carry enough water to create enough steam or carry enough batteries to create it . This is a troll post of fake technology in case you noticed 🤣
@@SeanHenrichsT-Stoff and Z-Stoff? I’d use C-Stoff instead of Z-Stoff, more oomph for the mass, but being hypergolic makes that a rather … explosive mixture. But, indeed, HTP is much more ecological safe than many other rocket propulsion fuels. Although it has a taste for eating up any organic material, like humans. Unfortunately, it has not the greatest ISP, especially w/o something to burn.
I guess they have launched a first stage successfully using steam. Then it uses fuels for the later stages. With that said. They are trying to build a bigger rocket, right? It is literally 420 engines strapped in like a hexagonal shape! Fatter than it is tall at first. The makers do have proof of their work, but their dream rocket looks straight out of a KSP game made by someone like me. Scott Manley has talked about them. It is worth a watch on just ridiculous the concept is.
Agreed like it's hidrogen peroxide in this case if I'm not mistaken, but steam engine can also be said about liquid fuel hidrogen and oxigen which exists for like over 50 years? Btw way less enviromentally dangerous than a peroxide 'bomb' in case of a failure
Better than Rocket is here Easy lift off Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship No Fire No Explosion No Flame Just Spin and Lift off Powered by Baterry Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space Can lift more than 100 Ton Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity? It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums: A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time. The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof. . . In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like. People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
There was a guy in California who killed himself because he accidentally deployed the parachute during the takeoff of his homemade steam-powered rocket.
A lot of rockets use hydrogen as fuel. It burns with oxygen to make water. Can’t get much cleaner than that. Peroxide propellant is a step backwards, and definitely not environmentally friendly or safe. Now, there are other propellants that aren’t as clean burning as hydrogen, but still seems better than this.
It's probably hydrogen peroxide decomposition. It's nothing new and craft like the X15 used combustion of ammonia with oxygen to release nitrogen and water vapor which is equally environmentally safe. For solid rockets, using ammonium nitrate as an oxidiser also releases no toxic fumes.
Unreliable isn't an issue most solid fueled rockets have. They can't be throttled or shut off arbitrarily. That's the only issue when using them on human rated rockets. That's why they're used as boosters only on human rated rockets.
He actually did talk about them. It is real. The water rockets are for lower stages, and they got them to work as intended mostly except they were tethered. Lower stages are steam with the higher ones being chemical. These mother fuckers are wild though. They want to now build a huge one with 420 rockets basically strapped. It is wider than it is taller, and looks just ridiculous. They be trippin dawg. So the kids say. I think they are just nuts, and were stupid to ask investment showing that. Looks like something I would make in KSP. Anyway I think there might be some niche uses. Weapons come to mind. Why? Because storing/handling water is a lot easier than many other fuels. Water doesn't expire, and way less cost of maintenence. Anyway I think it is a cool demonstrator. I swear Scott Manley said it would carry a 20kg payload to space. That is pathetic if true.
Iv seen this one, no people, it's not hydrogen peroxide. It's battery power, high output heating elements, turning just water to steam. Iv seen their stuff on TH-cam and it does work, and produce thrust. Tho I very much doubt It would be able to carry the required volume of water or battery power to run for very long
Physics. Energy has to come from somewhere. So much like an E vehicle, the pollution is simply remoted offsite. The energy required is considerable and my spitball says the only thing getting hoisted is the investors wallets.
You do know most rocket fuel reacts into water right? The most efficient is liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen, combusts to form H2O and a couple other H2 and O2 variants in smaller quantities
I think this is using HTP / T-stoff. Not remotely safe or nontoxic and certainly not battery powered. Basically in WWII the Germans decided to use this to make flying pilot-liquification machines know as the Me-163.
😊So let's think about this.. (And by the way these are simply my own thoughts, I haven't checked any official sources yet.) A big part of the pre-launch preparation routine should strategically include preheating, and therefore pre-energizing, the water, or whatever fluid they use, inside both the first and second stages pressure vessels, to far above the boiling point, which creates a huge load of massively energized steam pressure in both stages' electrically heated boilers!! Up to the last second of the countdown the electric heating coils inside the boilers are fed power through the all-electric umbilical cord to the ship, which disconnects at the last second during launch, the same way most other rockets unplug their's. Therefore it's already superheated and super-energized at that point of the countdown, and ready to blast off right at the get-go when they finally open the steam valve! While at the same time of disconnect, the batteries take over and are fully engaged enough to superheat up the rest of the superheated fluid along with the superheated steam.. This maintains an immense and steady flow of powerfully expelled steam energy, comparably as effective as some chemical-based boosters. So the first stage's batteries are merely employed to steadily continue boiling away during the incredibly intense, very short minutes of flight, before the depleted first stage is jettisoned, coinciding with the depletion of that battery pack's speedy, intense first-stage power-transfer cycle. That's how quick those batteries have played their role. Likewise, the second stage has the very similar routine as the first.. (Those two stages of the launch only comprises very few minutes to get the speed up to where the final stage's chemical engine ignites.) By the way, you got to love the irony, how that the electricity was generated from a regional coal, or natural-gas-fired power plant, providing electricity to the launch site, which charges the batteries, and also powers the electric boilers' preheating systems. Therefore, this new rocket could be described as a coal-fired, steam powered rocket ship... Correct?! 😊 And if that power plant was nuclear, you could accurately call it a nuclear powered space ship! And to be technically correct, it's actually a 3-cycle, steam-electric, to electric-steam, battery-assisted rocket !!! 🤔 😂 Wow?😲
Great! And as we get away from fossil fuel energy (much more than half way there), we can call it a cooperative solar-panel/wind-turbine/hydro-turbine/geothermal very-eco-friendly rocket. Right?❤
@@TheSpectralArtisan Never use it myself 😄. It can only work using a miniture nuclear device, not a battery. Another explored option in the past is ground laser device.
It will be capable of carrying a payload of 5 Weebles well downrange on a near orbital trajectory via the proximal parhelion to terminal velocity. Unfortunately eBay is currently sold out of Weebles.
I don't believe cientists, i believe people with brains, it's written one must love the Lord your God with all the hart, your soul and your whole brain 😊
My question is not not how powerful is it (superheated steam, when properly harnessed, is just like plasma when it comes to terms of energy releasef and power capabilities), but HOW do you make it? Boiling off that much water and storing the respective fuel (superheated water under IMMENSE PRESSURE) would take INSANE amounts of energy (fuel)! WHERE AND HOW do you generate that much clean energy on a rocket? Or HOW do you contain the superheated water long enough before you "flash" it to steam in the nozzle? This whole process just doesn't make sense to me. It seems impossible!
I would venture to say that the final stage, which is not stated to be steam, is more conventional and does 95% of the work. Steam does not get it to 137 miles and 17700 mph... not even close.
@@mikejosef2470 - ah, many reasons.... Absolute safety - any chemical rocket has to operate at the limits of the strength of materials, with little to no safety margins due to the low specific impulse of the propulsion system. For the same reason, it has to carry a huge amount of volatile propellants which would release their energy catastrophically in the event of relatively minor engineering failures. Relative safety - in the event of a failure, a steam explosion is in no way less dangerous than a fire explosion.
We have all the stuff around us we need to create magnificent things . All we need the oil companies in you know kerosene rockets like Elon Musk has to stop . I doubt that's going to happen anytime soon .
1st they gave us paper straws and now Eco friendly nuclear warheads? A truly amazing time to be alive
😂😂😂
environment friendly nuke vehicle has that magical selling point. genius marketing team 😂
It couldn't reach sufficient attitude.
You do have me beat on the batteries not being environmentally friendly. 😄👍
Pretty sure that a "reusable rocket" isn't used for warheads. This is for placing satellites and landing to be refueled and used again when needed.
Big question, what is the payload size?
I'm going to call bs on this right now
Yep! Doesn't even pass the basic sniff test, does it?
Why? State your theory?
@@yetanotherdude3955Where does the steam come from?
@yetanotherdude3955 the laws of physics apply . You couldn't carry enough water to create enough steam or carry enough batteries to create it . This is a troll post of fake technology in case you noticed 🤣
@@yetanotherdude3955 1 it’s basically impossible 2 Arca is a crypto scam not an actual rocket company
'steam' = hydrogen peroxide
😭🤣
Came to write this, definitely high test H2O2 with a metal catalyst
@@SeanHenrichsT-Stoff and Z-Stoff?
I’d use C-Stoff instead of Z-Stoff, more oomph for the mass, but being hypergolic makes that a rather … explosive mixture.
But, indeed, HTP is much more ecological safe than many other rocket propulsion fuels. Although it has a taste for eating up any organic material, like humans. Unfortunately, it has not the greatest ISP, especially w/o something to burn.
I mean its exhaust is steam and hydrogen
I guess they have launched a first stage successfully using steam. Then it uses fuels for the later stages.
With that said. They are trying to build a bigger rocket, right? It is literally 420 engines strapped in like a hexagonal shape! Fatter than it is tall at first.
The makers do have proof of their work, but their dream rocket looks straight out of a KSP game made by someone like me.
Scott Manley has talked about them. It is worth a watch on just ridiculous the concept is.
This video is very misleading.
Very, but its typical pandering
"Scary Unsafe!" But wont tell you why or how lol
Low Information is control
@@DraconX3high test H2O2+metal catalyst lined chamber, big secret
Agreed like it's hidrogen peroxide in this case if I'm not mistaken, but steam engine can also be said about liquid fuel hidrogen and oxigen which exists for like over 50 years? Btw way less enviromentally dangerous than a peroxide 'bomb' in case of a failure
@@SeanHenrichsno its only water.
@@MrEh5 either way, no big secret
Solid Rocket Motors are one of the most reliable ticket engines every designed. They are stupid simple and utterly reliable.
Better than Rocket is here
Easy lift off
Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship
No Fire
No Explosion
No Flame
Just Spin and
Lift off
Powered by Baterry
Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery
can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space
Can lift more than 100 Ton
Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity?
It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums:
A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time.
The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof.
.
.
In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like.
People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
There was a guy in California who killed himself because he accidentally deployed the parachute during the takeoff of his homemade steam-powered rocket.
Mad Mike
He was trying to prove the world was flat
A lot of rockets use hydrogen as fuel. It burns with oxygen to make water. Can’t get much cleaner than that. Peroxide propellant is a step backwards, and definitely not environmentally friendly or safe.
Now, there are other propellants that aren’t as clean burning as hydrogen, but still seems better than this.
'..Battery Powered Steam Propulsion..?'
Where's the coal car and smokestack? 😂
first steam plane flew in the very early thirties and the v2 rocket was steam powered
Dream on... Battery powerd?! Common...
Batteries do not carry that much energy.
Needs a neuclear power pack.
the propellant pumps are battery powered, maybe?
Battery powered pumps for the H2O2 with a metal catalyst lined chamber. Easy peasy
When people hear battery and immediately think it works like a toy plane 💀
They have been develloping this for several years. And it is battery powered.
People will believe anything if there's nice video and unsubstantiated numbers. This is the rubbish musk would spruike
Spruike? Isn't musk used in making perfume?
It's probably hydrogen peroxide decomposition. It's nothing new and craft like the X15 used combustion of ammonia with oxygen to release nitrogen and water vapor which is equally environmentally safe. For solid rockets, using ammonium nitrate as an oxidiser also releases no toxic fumes.
Makes sense.All the fuel burning with minimum use. Make steam it has tremendous volume and weight...
Unreliable isn't an issue most solid fueled rockets have. They can't be throttled or shut off arbitrarily. That's the only issue when using them on human rated rockets. That's why they're used as boosters only on human rated rockets.
Well.....I am certainly steamed over this.
Americans: do you a believe a rocket can fly 147493 bubble gum wrappers per second ? Or reach an altitude of 72002762 earlobes ?:
Cool tail fins!👍
One giant steamy leap for mankind...
Even using that in war still it's safe ang eco-friendly.
Attention Scott Manley.
He actually did talk about them. It is real. The water rockets are for lower stages, and they got them to work as intended mostly except they were tethered.
Lower stages are steam with the higher ones being chemical.
These mother fuckers are wild though. They want to now build a huge one with 420 rockets basically strapped. It is wider than it is taller, and looks just ridiculous.
They be trippin dawg. So the kids say. I think they are just nuts, and were stupid to ask investment showing that. Looks like something I would make in KSP.
Anyway I think there might be some niche uses. Weapons come to mind.
Why? Because storing/handling water is a lot easier than many other fuels. Water doesn't expire, and way less cost of maintenence.
Anyway I think it is a cool demonstrator.
I swear Scott Manley said it would carry a 20kg payload to space. That is pathetic if true.
To see back 16 years ago, go here- dragosmur
If works go for it.
Sounds faster than Stephensons version.🙂
Iv seen this one, no people, it's not hydrogen peroxide.
It's battery power, high output heating elements, turning just water to steam.
Iv seen their stuff on TH-cam and it does work, and produce thrust. Tho I very much doubt It would be able to carry the required volume of water or battery power to run for very long
Physics. Energy has to come from somewhere. So much like an E vehicle, the pollution is simply remoted offsite. The energy required is considerable and my spitball says the only thing getting hoisted is the investors wallets.
This might put small payloads in low earth orbits . Third stage is regular rocket , it has to be
Now if the boosters can be made of ice it could possibly be 100% reusable.
I'm Amazed!!
with h2 o2, yeah....peroxide rockets are pretty strong
STEAMPUNK!!! 🚂⚙️
Nazis beat ya to it
Is the “steam” or peroxide produced with coal or oil in the supply chain?
You do know most rocket fuel reacts into water right? The most efficient is liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen, combusts to form H2O and a couple other H2 and O2 variants in smaller quantities
Good for the environment but it should have more carrying capacity..
What are the Batteries made from? What happens to the Batteries after launch?
Eco-friendly with a nuclear warhead.
Yeah, and I have a steam powered outboard.
Environmentally friendly rocket anyone else see the irony in this being used as a missile.
I think this is using HTP / T-stoff. Not remotely safe or nontoxic and certainly not battery powered. Basically in WWII the Germans decided to use this to make flying pilot-liquification machines know as the Me-163.
That's 😎
I bet it's as safe for human as the rest of the war industries funding their development and adaptation as cruise missiles. 😆
Batery powered? 😂😂😂
Aaaaaaand where, pray tell, is all that energy coming from?
Can you make Private Jets steam-powered?
😊So let's think about this..
(And by the way these are simply my own thoughts, I haven't checked any official sources yet.)
A big part of the pre-launch preparation routine should strategically include preheating, and therefore pre-energizing, the water, or whatever fluid they use, inside both the first and second stages pressure vessels, to far above the boiling point, which creates a huge load of massively energized steam pressure in both stages' electrically heated boilers!!
Up to the last second of the countdown the electric heating coils inside the boilers are fed power through the all-electric umbilical cord to the ship, which disconnects at the last second during launch, the same way most other rockets unplug their's.
Therefore it's already superheated and super-energized at that point of the countdown, and ready to blast off right at the get-go when they finally open the steam valve!
While at the same time of disconnect, the batteries take over and are fully engaged enough to superheat up the rest of the superheated fluid along with the superheated steam.. This maintains an immense and steady flow of powerfully expelled steam energy, comparably as effective as some chemical-based boosters.
So the first stage's batteries are merely employed to steadily continue boiling away during the incredibly intense, very short minutes of flight, before the depleted first stage is jettisoned, coinciding with the depletion of that battery pack's speedy, intense first-stage power-transfer cycle. That's how quick those batteries have played their role.
Likewise, the second stage has the very similar routine as the first..
(Those two stages of the launch only comprises very few minutes to get the speed up to where the final stage's chemical engine ignites.)
By the way, you got to love the irony, how that the electricity was generated from a regional coal, or natural-gas-fired power plant, providing electricity to the launch site, which charges the batteries, and also powers the electric boilers' preheating systems.
Therefore, this new rocket could be described as a coal-fired, steam powered rocket ship... Correct?! 😊
And if that power plant was nuclear, you could accurately call it a nuclear powered space ship!
And to be technically correct, it's actually a 3-cycle, steam-electric, to electric-steam, battery-assisted rocket !!! 🤔 😂
Wow?😲
Great! And as we get away from fossil fuel energy (much more than half way there), we can call it a cooperative solar-panel/wind-turbine/hydro-turbine/geothermal very-eco-friendly rocket. Right?❤
No!
Except that at 164k feet it's still within the atmosphere
Is this a prototype or did they actually put a payload into orbit?! They basically have the velocity
Prototype, and i doubt it will ever evolve into an orbital rocket before Acra (the company) goes bankrupt
Some one call elon!
Steampunk!
Just us oxygen and hydrogen, you'll be spitting out the same thing and have way more energy.
There seems to be a lot of saturation, I wonder if a hybrid rocket, using fuel to super heat the steam would be more efficient.
Interesting lower end on that rocket
That's a lot of coal to shovel quickly
Did the voice over say "battery powered" rocket ?!
Is it H20 steam or like peroxide & catalyst mesh? Remember those little water rocket toys?
What's the source of energy? If it's hidrozin, it's not very eco-friendly.
It’s steam?
Hydrazine has a thick deep orange colored exhaust doesn’t it?? 🤔
@@TheSpectralArtisan
Never use it myself 😄.
It can only work using a miniture nuclear device, not a battery.
Another explored option in the past is ground laser device.
@@TheSpectralArtisan thats the Nitrogen Tetroxide oxidiser
@TheSpectralArtisan
It's the oxidizer Dinitrogen tetroxide that has the orange color.
High test H2O2 with a metal catalyst lined "combustion" chamber
I wouldn't quite call this innovation.
"battery powerered steam propulsion" yes ... battery powerered rocket but eco friendly ....
I think steam power is sorely underutilized in general.
It will be capable of carrying a payload of 5 Weebles well downrange on a near orbital trajectory via the proximal parhelion to terminal velocity. Unfortunately eBay is currently sold out of Weebles.
"Battery powered"
I don't believe cientists, i believe people with brains, it's written one must love the Lord your God with all the hart, your soul and your whole brain 😊
Ok... Your point?
that is steam punk af!
nuclear fuel rods and water will make this happen
Wonder how scalable this is?…
I still want to know why doesn't oxygen disappear in to outer space 😮 😂😂
My question is not not how powerful is it (superheated steam, when properly harnessed, is just like plasma when it comes to terms of energy releasef and power capabilities), but HOW do you make it? Boiling off that much water and storing the respective fuel (superheated water under IMMENSE PRESSURE) would take INSANE amounts of energy (fuel)! WHERE AND HOW do you generate that much clean energy on a rocket? Or HOW do you contain the superheated water long enough before you "flash" it to steam in the nozzle? This whole process just doesn't make sense to me. It seems impossible!
I would venture to say that the final stage, which is not stated to be steam, is more conventional and does 95% of the work. Steam does not get it to 137 miles and 17700 mph... not even close.
i imagine the US invading another country under the premise of possessing a non environment friendly nuke missiles 😂
Is it hydrogen peroxide and a silver catalytic converter???
Liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen isnt water enough 😂
If by steam-powered you mean high-test hydrogen peroxide, then its not exact safe.
Also, water vapor is a greenhouse gas.
Who's moaning about clouds being bad for the environment?
EVERY GAS is a GREEN HOUSE GAS and if natural it is fine!
"Unreliable" solid rocket boosters? Used on many, if not all space missions. Okay...
Biased "eco-friendly" channel, what can we say?
Or you could just use a methane roxket and cut the Co2 in half or go with hydrogen and completely eliminate the Co2 output
This is not "a reality", The Isp is not high enough. It bull.
Is that like burning liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen?
the only way to use steam to propel a rocket into space is jf you make it from liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen.
🤔 wonder what you get when you combine liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen....
They are still around?
Steam pressure needed makes this far from safe.
ARCA a company in Romania
Flush it out with vinegar once a month or so.
And that battery is eco friendly too?
Its powere by unicorn farts!
Prove it can carry a payload.
What's the. Payload capacity
SCAM!!! I thought ANYTHING coming out of CHAD should be Sus!
That's great if your payload weighs 5 kg
battery power is bs, maybe just the H202 pump?
Still a kettle on the ground
What's the catch?
The hydrogen oxygen engine of the Satrun rockets were also "eco friendly" nothing new
They were kerosene and oxygen. You're thinking of the shuttle engines.
Who makes it?
Arca space
Black Knight...
Ask mad Mike Hughes
The highest altitude reached so far is a few hundred meters.
The 3rd stage is not steam.
Yeah, the second stage launches, the 3rd fires.
And I'd bet my last dollar that it does 95% of the work.
A rocket putting anything up from out of Earth's gravity well cannot be "safe".
Why not? People would have said aeroplanes could never be safe.
@@mikejosef2470 - ah, many reasons....
Absolute safety - any chemical rocket has to operate at the limits of the strength of materials, with little to no safety margins due to the low specific impulse of the propulsion system. For the same reason, it has to carry a huge amount of volatile propellants which would release their energy catastrophically in the event of relatively minor engineering failures.
Relative safety - in the event of a failure, a steam explosion is in no way less dangerous than a fire explosion.
We have all the stuff around us we need to create magnificent things . All we need the oil companies in you know kerosene rockets like Elon Musk has to stop . I doubt that's going to happen anytime soon .
😂😂😂😂.... steam?.... and steam trains back then were very effective too huh....
17k mph at that altitude is wild, is the nose heat shielded?
137 miles up is space, with no significant atmospheric friction.
What about the batteries. Theyy will have ot be disposed of at some point.
No, no I don’t. Sounds like another hokey idea and looks like a bunch of cgi to sell it.
What kind of payload is possible.