Scientists discover breakthrough material that stores carbon faster than trees
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ค. 2024
- Scientists discover breakthrough material that stores carbon faster than trees
👇👇 Buy something and support The Electric Viking Store 👇👇
shop.theelectricviking.com/
Size guide and other help for the store 👇
theelectricviking.com/the-ele...
🔔 Subscribe and hit the notification bell! ► / @electricviking
Join me on Patreon ► / theelectricviking
Join as a member in The Electric Viking TH-cam►
/ @electricviking
Members-only videos (see videos before anyone else)►
• Members-only videos
👇 Please donate here for Shanna (Viking's wife) if you can 👇
gofund.me/ef6650d7
See what happened to Shanna:
• Stage 4 can go to hell...
The Electric Viking on other platforms:
Rumble ► rumble.com/c/TheElectricViking
Facebook page ► / theelectricvikingfb
Facebook group ► / theevfbgroup
Twitter ► / theevking
Instagram ► / theelectricvking
Pinterest ► / theelectricviking
Telegram ► t.me/theelectricviking
TikTok ► / theelectricviking
👇 See more about me 👇
• You've been asking; he...
👇 My Bali trip 👇
• I went to Indonesia an...
👇 Video about My Skateboard 👇
• EASIEST & cheapest way...
👇 Subscribe to my kids channel 👇
tinyurl.com/subscribetojackan...
See more videos:
Top AI researchers say AI will end humanity soon - Elon Musk disagrees
• Top AI researchers say...
China's Tesla Bot rival reveals scarily ‘human-like’ Astribot S1 robot
• China's Tesla Bot riva...
Musk says Tesla will sell the Optimus humanoid robot next year
• Musk says Tesla will s...
Sodium battery with higher energy density than Tesla cells charges in seconds
• Sodium battery with hi...
Tesla reveals NEW FSD update v12.3.5 - owners say Autonomy CLOSE
• Tesla reveals NEW FSD ...
Tesla fast-tracking $25,000 Model 2 and Model Y Juniper for late 2024
• Tesla fast-tracking $2...
Tesla reveals Model 3 Performance +: 0-60 mph in 2.9 sec & cheaper price
• Tesla reveals Model 3 ...
Tesla has lowest 10 yr maintenance and repair cost of any brand in America
• Tesla has lowest 10 yr...
Elon Musk reveals Tesla's plan for FSD in China
• Elon Musk reveals Tesl...
Tesla Model Y sales fall 42% but it still wins in Europe + BYD up 16,312%
• Tesla Model Y sales fa...
Tesla’s biggest retail shareholder votes against Elon Musk’s $55 billion
• Tesla’s biggest retail...
Kia’s new rival to $25k Tesla, the EV2, could cost only $20,000
• Kia’s new rival to $25...
Tesla slashes the price of the Model Y, Model X and Model S as sales slow
• Tesla slashes the pric...
Elon Musk’s Tesla Roadster has traveled 3.1 Billion miles
• Elon Musk’s Tesla Road...
Andrej Karpathy responds to 'Tesla should remove Elon Musk as CEO'
• Andrej Karpathy respon...
Tesla reveals cheaper add on Powerwall 3 option and LFP battery chemistry
• Tesla reveals cheaper ...
Tesla has installed over 600,000 Powerwalls worldwide
• Tesla has installed ov...
Tesla Powershare bidirectional charging V2L, V2H, V2V & Powerwall
• Tesla Powershare bidir...
Tesla DROPS the price of the Powerwall home battery AGAIN
• Tesla DROPS the price ...
Tesla’s Cybertruck Basecamp integrates with Cybertruck 'TENT MODE'
• Tesla’s Cybertruck Bas...
Tesla Cybertruck comes in 3 ‘colors’ for $6,500 - cheaper than Model Y
• Tesla Cybertruck comes...
Cybertruck range revealed after Tesla STOP taking orders
• Cybertruck range revea...
Tesla employee reveals claimed Cybertruck battery size...
• Tesla employee reveals...
Swedish Government loses case against Tesla in move Elon Musk calls 'insane'
• Swedish Government los...
Tesla offers discounts on inventory stock but raises prices of new Model Y
• Tesla offers discounts...
#artificialintelligence #robot #scientist #evproduction
👇Reference to the news/charts & videos used in this video:
www.independent.co.uk/tech/gr...
This channel may use some copyrighted materials without specific authorization of the owner; but content used here falls under the “Fair Use” Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.
Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Contact us for any copyright issues. If you want a credit of any footage we are using, please let us know.
Website: theelectricviking.com/contact/
Email: contact@theelectricviking.com
Oh no, not another game changer breakthrough! I am delirious with excitement.
At least it doesn't change everything - ROFL
Trees have other benefits too like helping to manage heavy downpours to reduce flooding and providing habitats.
Yeah, I don't want a house made out of that stuff, I'd rather have wood.
Yes the complete isolation of only carbon emissions as the sole focus shows the deep shit we are in.
@@naveennandigum8630 One volcano can make us humble again.
The carbon is already captured in the ground. Just dont burn it or make plastics and we will be good
so what replaces all the plastics consumers not that easy. A serious plan to transition from polymers made from crudes to bioorganic polymers needs to be implemented. That takes persistence as Big Oil won't let go of their strangle hold on our every dependency
@@PeeJay3714if they don't break down organically might not be better
Says the guy with an iPhone and a car in the garage of his air-conditioned home.
Too late. We already burnt so much that even if we stop tomorrow, the climate change that it will cause will still be disastrous. Gotta start getting it out of the air.
@Zip_Silver Yes the IPhone I agree since China's a supporter of slavery, the garage, and AC you're wrong. Houses can be built of sustainable materials or recycled, AC units can be heat pumps and powered via renewable energy, so I'd say that's fairly forward thinking
How much of this porous material is needed to capture a significant amount and where would it be stored. How much energy is required for the process.
Not only that but how do we Hoover it all up?
Imagine a small room with a soda straw spewing wood smoke and another straw elsewhere inhaling the room’s common air.
Despite a 1:1 relationship of airflow, the room will remain smoky.
You’d need something like 100x the filtration to make a real dent in the smell.
Now scale that to every tailpipe and smokestack on earth lol
Granted my argument is an overreach for CO2 because it’s safe at trace (smell) percentages but in the case of sulfur hexaflouride and carbon monoxide, probably not.
yeah this is... ebegging for research grants and nothing more
This will work about as well as an acre of grass. Add well-managed grazing animals and the grass will beat this nonsense by an order of magnitude or more. Bah, humbug.
Sam, thank you for this wonderful video. I like to use the Ecosia search engine. They use their profits to plant the right trees in the right places with the help of the local people. In addition to capturing carbon dioxide, trees are pretty to see, they help the local people by changing rainfall patterns, and they provide a place for animals to live. I hope you and your family are having a wonderful day. Sheila Mink in New Mexico
There are tens of thousands of game changer discoveries in labs found every year, but less than a few hundred applicable in real life
Trees are a slow way to capture carbon. Wild flowers are faster.
Up to 80% of the wild flowers carbon escapes. So it is kind of a false hope. A farmers grain field is more effective and the straw can be turned under incorporating the carbon into the soil.
The problem is once captured, how do you keep it sequestered? Wood can be turned into charcoal and buried back into the ground, but it's pointless unless you stop extracting coal in the first place.
@@EdgewiseSJ Just let the trees grow, they will sequester it for centuries
True! But they release it again a whole lot faster too when they die and decompose. We need a lot longer binding process and trees are way better at that. And even more permanent (as in stone and rock) solutions are needed for that.
Wow, isn’t this the world ending plot to “snowpiercer”! We release a substance into the atmosphere that removes so much greenhouse gases that the earth falls into a world wide Ice Age.
Sam, I am with you on this. CCS does not reduce the CO2. It just stores it. It has never been successfully achieved at scale despite O&G throwing billions at it. This type of engineering is not a mass market solution. Stopping CO2 emissions altougher, we're possibly, should be our strategy. Some companies would be better to invest in solar, wind & batteries rather than CCS.
4:45 I'm also a huge fan of fortests for sequestration, but its good to take an 'all hands in deck' approach...and this sounds like it can taeget nasty compounds trees may not be as effective against.
interesting thing about sulferhexafloride or SF6 gas is that its used in power transmission. medium to high voltage switching is done with contact bathed in SF6 gas because it prevents arcing. MVS switchgear and HV circuit breakers and MSG switchgear all use SF6 gas and they do leak it.
I remember a training video from a large international company I work for stating that they have eliminated SF6 gas from their HV and MV switchgear. I don't directly work for the department concerned but I thought I would just mention it to show there are actually solutions out there to this issue.
@bryanackerly7775 yea, if we eliminate the use they will need a alternative. My data center is between 2015 and 2024 buildings and we use all SF6 so there is probably a compromise in using the alternative gas. It's like refrigerant gas, there are only so many elements on the periodic table to make a hydrocarbon.
Sounds like this stuff would make a good scrubber for closed environments.
Assume that carbon capture is truth, even economical, do we know whether capturing CO2 in the air a good thing or a bad thing? There are always two sides to everything. I have seen far too many group thinking that increase of CO2 is a bad thing, but has there studies that it is good thing?
CO2 is definitely not a bad thing, ask a tree or any living thing. Are humans the main reason for climate change? You cannot question the “science”, especially if all the money goes to science that supports the narrative. If your research says otherwise you will have no future.
The question I have is cost. How much do these facilities cost to build and operate? Trees do it almost for free except the cost of planting.
This is great news 😁
Thanks Sam for raising your volume a bit. I usually have to raise my volume to 80 to hear you.
Get new speakers.
@@NeoKailthas Not the problem. 90% of other videos are fine. I have a 100W amp and 2 DMLs right next to my head. And BTW butt out. I wasn't looking for advice from some rando.
@@tims8603 don't post negative comments if you don't want to be challenged. Also this is a you problem. We're not having issues with the volume
@@NeoKailthas How is thanking Sam for raising the volume negative? BTW butt out. I ain't about you.
It's going to take everything. Direct carbon capture from air, removing ice vehicles from the road, changing the process of the largest emitters like steel and concrete production, changing agriculture so it emits less and the soil absorbs more including biochar, pumping c02 into the ground etc. etc. We have a lot to do to try and salvage what's left of the future climate.
Love it, Maybe create air filters from it? #air_filter If it can filter out other compounds and diseases from air could use it in air conditioners for homes, offices and hospitals. Every thing has its place.
Would it be faster than fields of hemp?
Hemp sounds good! Fast growing and you can make fabric o and rope out of it! :)
@@RandyP-jr1ekand hempcrete.
Nature has the answer to everything. Plant more trees.
Gasoline engine exhaust is a mixture of many chemicals. It is produced when engines, including those in cars, trucks, boats, and motorized equipment, burn gasoline. These chemicals include benzene, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, ethylbenzene, and 1,3-butadiene.
Bingo,clean up the air pollution and case closed.
Leaving the forest we already have is a better idea
The videos shown do not show carbon emission…they show precipitated steam…ie: water.
It's not really game changing until it's cheaper than not burning fossil fuels, has no unpleasant side effect and is cheap and easy to store indefinitely. You didn't mention any of that so I assume this is only theoretical, not really a game changer at all. Just more smoke and mirrors to allow business as usual.
Absorbing quicker than trees is like saying faster then a glacier moves. That is an incredibly low hurdle. PR stunt to get more free funding. With trees we do end up with a very useful crop over time as well. Let alone all the habitat they provide wildlife.
Masanobu Fukuoka developed coating tree seeds, spreading, and let nature do the rest. It's simple, easy, inexpensive, and popular in the 3rd world.
So what year do you think we'll have to reintroduce ICE engines to counteract too much carbon removal?
Looks like a material for my Venus terraforming project.
Conversely, if we wanted to terraform Mars we would pump all the carbon we could muster into the atmosphere!
@@jaaklucas1329 i believe nitrogen is going to be the real issue with Mars but Venus has enough to share.
an'@@waywardgeologist2520 Just watching the movie"The Titan".Highly recommend. The concept is dont terraform a planet to suit our existence, adapt a human on the cellular level to exist there.Saturns moon Titan has a lot of nitrogen!
I believe growing hemp seqeusters as much as a pine tree - a tree that takes 20 years plus to grow. Hemp can produce 2 crops a year - it provides nutritous flour, material for ropes or clothing, hempcrete for building without the need for herbicide or pesticide and it cleans up degraded soils. What are we waiting for? Humanity is so dumb at times.
Come on Scotland wonderful news
👍👍
The real problem here is, even if we reduce our oil consumption/production by 99%, while still using a tiny bit of plastic or some kind of oil byproduct, we will have passionate loyal fanatics of big oil who will still try & argue that we shouldn’t stop using it, or it isn’t realistic, or they will condescendingly ask us if we’re aware that oil is made for other things besides gasoline. Anything to pretend that were idiots, even if it’s reduced by 99.99%.
Just grow bamboo, it's fadtest growing plant and can replace wood.
There is no mention of what you do with the material once it becomes saturated with CO2. Do you go and bury that material underground? If so, we will need billions of tons of it annually. Or is there a way to extract the C02 back out of it? That would make more sense, but then they need to explain how. Because the extraction process is going to use some energy. Is it a little or a lot? If it is a lot, the idea is dead on arrival.
Seems kind of doublethink. Dig up the carbon where it is stored, burn it and release it into the atmosphere where theres too much of it then recapture it and restore it!
Morning mate
China's 15 biggest (not only) bus makers (many BEV - some even autonomous):
Yutong bus
Higer bus
Zhongtong Bus
Kinglong Motors
JMC Bus
Foton Ouhui AUV
BYD bus
Golden Dragon Bus
Ankai bus AK
Changan Kaicheng
Dongfeng Chaolong
Nanjing Iveco NAVECO
Brilliance Renault Gold Cup
Sunwin bus
Sunlong Bus
What about planting bamboo? Grows much faster than trees and have a million uses for it from building materials to toilet paper.
Have you seen the prices of products made from bamboo? People will not spend double so its a no go.
Personally I love bamboo but in N.America for instance its classified as an invasive species.Anyone whos planted it in their back yard knows it can never be eradicated or contained really. That said giant bamboo especially is an amazing species.
The purpose of net zero is to produce a food and energy shortage.
This won't matter. The capitalist system goal is profit not preserving the environment. As long as there is extra cost to cleaning the environment, companies will fight it and refuse to spend money on it.
Kudos for correctly pronouncing 'Edinburgh'. 😀
Edin"BRUH"? 😂
Then what do you the material that absorbs the carbon dioxide?
Carbon dioxide is not pollution and only accounts for 0.04% of the atmosphere, up from 0.03% in the past few decades.
If only we could stop all the noxious fumes were pumping into our air that we breath.
😂
Go to study.
If you eat 1g of cianet is what percentagem of your Weiight? You Will die.
It is not need to get the percentage of Vénus, to BE in hoven. For earth more 5°C is a huge differece.
@jaaklucas1329 that's easily achieved. The process is called DYING 😅
@@robertfonovic3551 And then turn into carbon.Dino fuel of the future!
Historically, co2 spikes correlate with extinction events, so the actual percentage is irrelevant. What is relevant is the change we, humans, introduced, tipping the delicate system off balance. Please don’t vote for populists who misinformed you while protecting interests of oil mafia. Thank you.
Use a Thunderstorm generator simples.
Sphagnum moss is better ,it improves soil,can be combined with trees
Great: so we all can carry on with burning stuff?! 😕
Viking is not only anti nuclear and anti logic/facts in general but also crypto carbonhead.
This new chemical cage... what happens if you eat a teaspoon of it?
It's called hemp?
If this stopped new trees being planted then we might run out of oxygen. Maybe.
But for what we need to remove a gas, which all the green plants need to breathe?
It’s a high excess of CO2 that we’re talking about in addition to other pollutants like SHF6 that plants cannot absorb that needs to be reduced. It needs to be rebalanced before temperatures get out of control and additional gases like methane are released into the atmosphere causing further heating.
But trees make oxygen!
What a joke !!! Do they produce oxygen ??? Does one suggest we replace trees with these molecular structures ??? Come on.
Just make filters for cars and such
What to do with these new materials full of carbon dioxide?
Computer simulations and AI are not the same thing
I don t understand what you do after you ve discovered the material
We're at the point where the car caught fire burned down and left a dark mark on the road and you're talking about how to put tires on it🤪😋
world co2 is apprx 400 ppm ,,,, max plant growth is apprx 1600 ppm ,,, the world needs more co2 not less
I don’t think carbon should be removed from the atmosphere assuming emissions stop within the next 30-40 years. There’s nothing wrong with a slightly warmer Earth with more carbon in the atmosphere for trees and crops.
In a few years the south of Europe will be a desert and not be able to sustain agriculture.
Yeah, and starve plants.
Carbon capture is a method of extracting money from goverments.
.
Not Governments. It's the taxpayer who foots the bill !!!!
Got to be careful here. Just how much carbon dioxide is created when manufacturing this carbon capture material? If it's something like quicklime then sure, it's going to capture lots of CO2 fast. But it gives off even more when you manufacture it in the first place.
I'd like to know a bit more about where and how we obtain this wonder material before I start breaking out the champagne.
Who says carbon should be captured? Klaus Schwab?
good but trees transform carbon in oxygen for free! not only store it!
If we get rid of CO2 in our atmosphere, won t this affect plants capacity to inhale CO2 and exhale O2, while eating the carbon they need for their growth?
The aim isn't to remove all of it, but to get it back to pre-industrial levels ... which leaves plenty for the plants.
CO2 is a life gas, the more CO2 the greener our planet. Trees flourish with more CO2 not less. These CO2 capturing projects are a joke, it’s about $$$
No worries about Europe... at least the Northern parts. Soon the AMOC will shutdown and they will freeze. Finland, Norway and other countries there may almost be unlivable due to the cold.
Wasn’t that always the case? 70 years ago? 100 years ago?
@@RandyP-jr1ek Well now they have actually found that AMOC is slowing dramatically from what it was just a few years ago. I now see estimates that it could stop within a decade or two at most.
This will backfire. The end of humanity, the beginning for AI
OPEC pumps out CO2 and makes trillions in profit, make them pay for the cost of capturing the equivalent CO2.
Yeah its called wild grasslands that ruminants should be eating and shitting back on. A la the Bison in the great plains of north america in the 1800s.
Well... Photosynthesis? We don't need ANY expensive tech for this - stop the madness.
#STOPBURNINGSTUFF
But I like burning wood!
@@waywardgeologist2520 Then Grasshopper you must plant trees each time you burn wood!!
Applied sciences field will take off with AI
Carbon capture is a mistake.
Plant growth is key to life, more CO2, more life.
This is false
What nonsense. You fell for the propoganda. It's way more complex than that
CO2 is good for plants , plants need less water, and more plant growth means more food .
While it's true that plant growth relies on CO2, CO2 isn't the only ingredient that plant relies on.
As an analogy lets imagine a person that loves pizza.
We can say this person's growth relies on pizza.
However, we all know that this person cannot grow just on pizza alone.
This person will need beverages and an assortment of other different food to thrive, otherwise this person is highly likely to get very sick from eating pizza every meal, forever.
Furthermore, this person may be able to eat an entire box of pizza per day, but would be impossible for this person to eat 10 boxes of pizza per day, no matter how much this person may love pizza.
So even if you give 100 boxes of pizza per day to this person, it won't make this person grow faster.
In the same reasoning, more CO2 won't make plants grow faster beyond a limit.
Furthermore, a plant's growth requires:
1) light, for photosynthesis
2) carbon dioxide (CO2), for conversion into carbohydrates during the photosynthesis process
3) water, for nutrient uptake, photosynthesis, and structural support
4) mineral nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, etc), for metabolic processes
5) oxygen, for respiration where plants convert stored energy into a usable form (especially at night when the sun doesn't shine). Yes, plants do breath oxygen.
Moreover, we had already crossed the point where there is so much CO2 in the air that even if the entire earth is covered in plants will not be enough to make a meaningful difference in CO2 levels. As a result, active carbon capture technologies are necessary to help reduce CO2 levels and mitigate the impacts of climate change.
@user-el1hd3iz6m CO2 has been a lot higher in the past, and the climate has always been changing
The rise n sulfur hexafluoride in the atmosphere is attributable in large part to releases from the expanding electric power sector,
CO2 is the most important trace gas of life! It isn't pollution.
Yes we’ve just had one of the coldest Aprils in the UK, global warming my arse. ElePRICK Viking😭😭
That’s why they changed the name to climate change instead of global warming…it’s the divergence from the mean so colder winters warmer summers, etc….hard for nature to adapt quickly
That's why it's called Climate Change. There's a big link below the video that can explain this to you.
freezing April in Nova Scotia Canada
I think we are too late and life on this planet is going to be decimated in the next 30 years.
And how much carbon dioxide is created by making this material?
How toxic is this stuff when through absorbing these gases and can it be safely buried in the millions of metric tons that would be needed? Does the material breakdown over time and release what they absorbed?
Questions questions questions.
You ship it of planet and sail it into the sun! 😆 Who knows? At least someone is attempting to find a viable solution that is fast enough to reverse the damage done already. Better than a screaming hot planet releasing even more volatiles into our atmosphere.
@@RandyP-jr1ek I would totally agree with you. Just asking questions since we don't want a false "solution" that actually makes things worse.
This is coal-oil lobby agenda. Just ask them one question. Does that material need much less energy to be made than is obtained while emission of same amout (that would be captured). Not to mention trees actually work by themselves in nature. END using coal/oil/natural gas, end of story.
So, Miss Anja, this new material can capture carbon dioxide?
Hand up when you're in class, Tommy.
Sorry, Miss.
Yes, Tommy. That's what they are proposing.
With no further use? Tree's at least do something. Can this stuff be eaten, used as a plastic...anything?
Nothing mentioned, Tommy.
Go back to the AI and get a refund.
You can't phytoplankton
Waste wood is the easiest capture opportunity. We don't need more trees, we need less dead wood decomposing. This can be done by placing wood underground where it is preserved indefinitely in deep anoxic spaces.
Sounds like top notch bs
Dear Vikings, trees are a great idea, but they grow slow Soo planting trees is a nice solution but the effect of it comes too late. Moreover trees die and then give most of their carbon back to the air. We need solutions now! So bind the carbon, make artificial clouds, pour water over gletsjers to make them white, keep the rainwater inside the cities and use it as a natural coolant on warm days etc. We need it all.
But it causes cancer
Bit late for Europe to be concerned now, the boat has sailed and they missed it and we are all doomed to a dead planet as humans contract cancer and die off.
BS. If that were true Europe would be experiencing a population decline. It is not.
Do conservatives care? Nope!
It's not that we don't care... we just noticed you have turned this into a political weapon (hence your comment). Every single climate measure has resulted in the government getting bigger and more powerful while the people get poorer. Why not some measure that limits, say, the ability to start wars since they are enormously destructive to the planet. I'll remind you out of the last 4 or 5 President the Republicans have actually started fewer wars. Your mascots: Al Gore, Greta and AOC have been both hilariously wrong in their predictions, and outrageously hypocritical with their own lifestyles. The movement had to be rebranded from "global warming" to "climate change" due to inaccuracies in your climate model and predictions. Fundamentally you guys are nihilistic and anti-human; we know we are the carbon you want to reduce. You campaign to make sure we don't have babies because it's bad for the environment, and then you flood the country with other folks who don't need to follow those rules. You praise Joe Biden for being a champion for environmental concerns, while ignoring that he committed the greatest act of environmental terrorism in human history. If you can decouple this movement from the obvious political grift, and stop stealing from people, and be a little more honest about what is not known about the science - then you might find you have way more allies in preservation than you thought.