Misconception #5: What About Gravity? | Thunderbolts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @fixitfast110
    @fixitfast110 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    the sun: i would ask some one to do a rudimentary calculation of the mass ejected from the sun in the last 1000 years and note if that amount of mas is greater or lesser than the mass of the sun. Also if this mass is close to the mass of the sun why has the sun remained the same mass or not. Or if the size of the sun remains consistent. The mass ejected has to come from some where. If the sun be plasma then it follows that it CREATES mass as a plasma. stuff me wonders abouts 🤔

    • @ArchonOne
      @ArchonOne หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      The electric model of space, the sun is synthesizing matter at its chromosphere. A stream of protons is flowing into the sun through the Birkeland current and being pinched magnetically just like on any planet or asteroid, however, it’s pinched so close together that rather than spinning until balloons out with centrifugal force to create gravity, it actually goes into arc mode and ignit the plasma sheath into that “fiery” surface you see. Every two protons that enter, are fused together in that pinch, letting off a massive outpouring of energy and turning two protons into one proton and one neutron. Those neutrons are blown out on the solar wind where they fuse with other particles as they accelerate away from the sun, picking up charge and bonding with others to form the elements that rain down on our planets. So the Sun is not injecting its own mass so much as it is quite literally creating all the building blocks of creation and spraying them across our planets. It also explains why there are billowing clouds of water vapor high up in the atmosphere where water cannot reach through evaporation. Well, that’s my limited understanding of it.

    • @jivadao
      @jivadao หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      In the Electric Universe Model the Sun is part of a bigger circuit connecting it to the galaxy. The Sun is receiving additional mass from the galaxy and then sending that mass on to the planets in the form of a solar wind. Just think of the Sun's heliosphere as a huge collector gathering the sparse ions and electrons in the near emptiness of space and channeling it into the Sun's north and south poles. Voyager 1 and 2 are passing through the boundary of the heliosphere at about twice the distance of Pluto..

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      the "missing mass" the gravity-centric nutters go on about, is the combined mass thrown off by tetrillions of stars over tetrillions of years

    • @TheDAT9
      @TheDAT9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The three replies here have validity.

    • @jackschwartz1783
      @jackschwartz1783 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Maybe I can clear something up for you. What they call Gravity is actually an Electro Magnetic attraction at the sub atomic level. It's easier to understand if you find the 2 errors in the equation that explains Electromagnetism and correct them. However, if you do, DON'T tell anyone. If you do, people will show up and take your material and STRONGLY suggest you never tell anyone what you found.

  • @MrMooagi977
    @MrMooagi977 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Always a good morning to see EU

    • @pedroferrr1412
      @pedroferrr1412 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well, time is relative, here is midnight!

    • @nadahere
      @nadahere หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jolly good, Mr. Magoo. =]]

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep. 5:50am here

  • @craigf2696
    @craigf2696 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    The Why Files flat out lied about Wal T.
    He's had more than enough time to correct any "mistake".
    Given the gravity of what E.U.T. brings to the table upon which the human experience rests, AJ remains unforgiven by me.
    Just another Flint Dibble, clinging to the perks offered in desperation by a dying paradigm.

    • @andrewmckeown6786
      @andrewmckeown6786 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I have faith in AJ & TWF
      I dont know what hoops he is required to jump through, but I think that he provided enough
      Tongue-in-cheek remarks to convey his actual position.
      Just my perspective. No disrespect intended to anyone👍😁❤️🇨🇦🍻

    • @TigerTiger-fx3ps
      @TigerTiger-fx3ps หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      they're cheap entertainers. "ehckle fish" tht show is aimed at kiddies

    • @JimmyMatis-h9y
      @JimmyMatis-h9y หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @andrewmckeown6786 true though, sadly, no tongue in cheek comments were made in the EU episode. I was shocked at his out of hand dismissal of EU and his apparent lack of basic research as he did misrepresent the theory as well as something about Wal Thornhill though i don't recall exactly what as it has been a while since I watched it.
      Until that episode i was a big fan but he either intentionally misunderstood it or didn't do much prep. The latter is unlikely based on his other videos. So, yeah, it left a bad taste in my mouth
      That, and have you watched his Symbols of the Illuminati video? Talking about the pyramid hand sign being about watching or gatekeeping (?) then remember how he closed every episode....with the hand sign mixed in with a "kung fu salute" and the Hindu greeting called anjalī: 🙏
      He even edit a frame of himself doing it mixed in between celebrities doing the same. 24:13 is the timestamp, if memory serves.
      Either he's low-key rubbing it in our faces or he does it to kick up speculations/engagement in the comments which is rather exploitational at worst, insincere at best.
      Wdyt?

    • @ArchonOne
      @ArchonOne หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Keep in mind AJ has a staff that does his research and during the research of that show hollow science was off-line. He didn’t even have access to Wal’s website. In my opinion, we should be bringing this to his attention 24 seven. Sooner or later he’s going to run out of material to cover and most likely revisit Electric Universe with a better understanding.

    • @acetate909
      @acetate909 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The Wal commentary in The Why Files episode was the part that angered me the most. They dismissed him as some fringe researcher with no qualifications to comment on cosmology. They even claimed they got a significant portion of their information from Professor Dave, an establishment plant who's sole job is to defend the dogmatic acedmic narrative and dismiss and skeptics with childish name calling and ad hominem attacks. Dave is the ultimate estabIishmenł łooI who attacks anyone who doesn't confirm to the "settled science" that seemingly changes every month.

  • @hackjealousy
    @hackjealousy หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Eh, I kinda stopped watching the Why Files after that episode. If they got the details so badly wrong on that episode, they are probably equally as sloppy with others.

    • @ni_tai
      @ni_tai หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      When you see someone misrepresent something you're intimately familiar with, it definitely does lead you to question all their other videos.

    • @izzyplusplusplus1004
      @izzyplusplusplus1004 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Had the same experience for real.

    • @thomascrator8183
      @thomascrator8183 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yup, it is lazy or worse done on purpose out of fear of push back. A.J. is just another liberal loser getting rich pretending to be something he isn't. A mainstream sheeple shill.

    • @JimmyMatis-h9y
      @JimmyMatis-h9y หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      NGL, AJ is very entertaining but the more why files i watched, the more I noticed he almost always ends up reaffirming the main stream. I can dig that for Sasquatch and such but with the physics and a few other topics....I wast surprised to learn that he used to be a programmer working for the government. Dude seems more counterintelligence than unbiased exploration of "fringe" topics.

    • @ArchonOne
      @ArchonOne หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I had the same take-away. I like that he admitted we do get the science right in a lot of cases, and that he aknowldge the standard models smug arrogance, but he may have misrepresented our model as bag as professor Dave. I still like the show but find myself heavily doubting his research now.

  • @JammaLamma
    @JammaLamma หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Thank you David!

  • @dantheman9135
    @dantheman9135 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Keep Crushing EUniverse...

  • @craigf2696
    @craigf2696 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The LHC paradox.
    The use of the only force available to downplay, if not deny the importance of the very same force.

  • @ArchonOne
    @ArchonOne หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Really good work David. I have to say though, I find the greatest trick of the Higgs Boson was to convince a bunch of smart people that it actually exists when it doesn’t.

    • @swainsongable
      @swainsongable หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Humans may be clever but not necessarily correct.

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I think the Bertrand Russell quote captures that. "The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd...”

    • @mikehannan8206
      @mikehannan8206 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The Higgs Bosun is in fact a stunning example of the “Texas Sharp Shooter” fallacy, where the target (declaration of Higgs discovery) is painted on AFTER the test has been conducted. Way to go scientists!😂

    • @swainsongable
      @swainsongable หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@daviddrew7852 ...like the Big Bang? 😉

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@swainsongable Yes, that's another classic.

  • @dleetr
    @dleetr หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    The circular logic collider. Can't find anything, need more money to find what we can't find.

    • @nickprohoroff3720
      @nickprohoroff3720 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Boom! Nailed it.

    • @nadahere
      @nadahere หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The circular logic collider = perpetual funding machine. Mystery of the Universe is discovered! =]]

    • @alanb2409
      @alanb2409 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Perpetual Funding...
      The search for Something that isn't there.
      🤫...✌️

    • @skynet4496
      @skynet4496 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just like virology

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@skynet4496 virology is a very real field of study, and it is important because viruses are real

  • @RunsWithScissorsSenior
    @RunsWithScissorsSenior หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    How big is the Universe? I shorted a connection while working on my son’s car. Flash! Zap! He said, “If you jump as soon as you see the flash, you won’t get electrocuted”. I suggested the electrons were traveling at the speed of light and I’m an old man who can’t jump that fast …anymore. He replied, “Electrons have mass. If they approach the speed of light they become infinitely massive.” I took a moment to ponder and replied, “I think your mother’s approaching the speed of light!” He and his brother collapsed into a heap of laughter.

    • @jivadao
      @jivadao หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Electrons in a wire travel very slowly about 7 inches per hour. These moving electrons create an electric field around the wire. Waves can travel through this field at near the speed of light. The power of the circuit is carried in the electric field, not in the wire. The power the field can carry is proportional to the number of moving electrons. The reason the wire heats up is due to resistance to the moving electrons.

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      things only become (theoretically) "infinitely massive' if they accelerate *due to thrust* which induces inertia - acceleration due to *falling* induces zero inertia! which is why Felix Baumgartner exceeded mach 1

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jivadao
      electricity does not travel "like water through a pipe" - in fact electricity travels in a manner very similar to Newtons Ladder

    • @Dlweta57
      @Dlweta57 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andyman8630ah, then that would explain his spin causing, an unconscious state which fortunately he recovered from before being transformed into a two dimensional form of non existance

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dlweta57
      when you can translate that into English, i'll (possibly) respond

  • @skiracer
    @skiracer หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Dear David and Dufus, The series is very well presented. Great Job!!

  • @DissonantDragon23
    @DissonantDragon23 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Great vid. The Three-Body Problem alone highlights the gaping hole in our knowledge.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      not really

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x Without knowledge, orthodox people like you only know how to talk nonsense, you are really incompetent.

  • @DR-dudders
    @DR-dudders หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Grabity

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother6584 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    "Magnetohydrodynamics & Plasma Physics" is discussed in Chapter 10 of Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (2nd edition). Revisiting the concepts in "Cosmical Electrodynamics" by Alfvén & Fälthammar, and "Physics of the Plasma Universe" by Peratt deserves attention, especially in light of contemporary observations from JWST and other observatories.

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Cheezus Cries himself could materialise in front of them and explain the basics and they'd still deny it in their confirmation bias

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andyman8630 None of which has anything to do with explaining gravity. And Perastt is an irrelevance anyway.

  • @tomladdus9264
    @tomladdus9264 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    excellent fnd: paper referencing Einstein not believing in black holes. Because we all know it is a religious dogma with main stream science.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And Einstein was wrong. Just as he was about quantum. And as Oppenheimer showed in a paper in the same year. And as has since been shown by observations.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 the brainless guy is back

    • @tomladdus9264
      @tomladdus9264 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davejones7632 no black holes are wrong and most of his theories are wrong.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tomladdus9264 And yet you can't deal with the evidence for relativity, and you can't deal with the evidence for black holes. Do any of you people ever have anything other than word salad? Rhetorical.

  • @duderama6750
    @duderama6750 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    One key to understanding the universe is the most conductive metals have the highest density.

    • @tisithecount4198
      @tisithecount4198 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@duderama6750 osmium is the densest metal. Silver is the most conductive. Ten seconds on google.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tisithecount4198 "but Google is a psy-op"

  • @Salmacys
    @Salmacys หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    excellent!

  • @WW-bt3tx
    @WW-bt3tx หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    I'm triggering cognitive dissonance by quoting Einstein who admitted he borrowed equations from Maxwell to explain what relativity couldn't.

    • @railwaymechanicalengineer4587
      @railwaymechanicalengineer4587 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The "Electric Universe Model" does NOT support the Theories and concepts of Albert Einstein & his first wife. Who it must be added was better qualified than Albert. It was "she" who wrote the original maths connected with those Five Theories of 1905. Indeed Alberts wife later became a qualified Astronomer, and her work is on public display today in Switzerland, where the "Einstein's" then lived !!!! So it was Alberts wife that had the degree in Mathematics NOT Albert. So your reference to Maxwell, who was in reality the person, that later tried to tidy up some of the original mathematical mistakes. Which all reveals yet another bit of the obscene Propaganda machine that has always surrounded Albert, since they "bought" him in 1928, from Max Planck a Professor of Mathematics and the Director of the General Institute for Science in Berlin, who had himself "used" little Albert, to promote himself Max Planck !!!
      As Professor Velikovsky is recorded as saying to Albert in Velikovsky's study, while poking little Albert in the chest. Quote: "You can run back to your Political Masters (The American Jewish Industrialists, a well known "Pressure Group") and tell them from me. I have absolutely no intention whatsoever of desisting from my work. Indeed I have a second book almost ready for publication" Unquote !!!! Velikovsky was referring to his publication "Worlds in Collision", (published 1950 by Macmillan). Which had just set the American Scientific community on fire, by its incredible revelations. It was this book, that eventually led to the modern "Electric Universe Model". Note: Velikovsky had approximately 30 times more qualifications than Albert, a fact they try to hide today !!!
      Indeed you will find here on this expansive "Thunderbolts Project" channel, many explanations dispelling "Einstein" as effective bunk. Especially the nonsense that "Time & Space" can be warped. (A concept born out of that absurd "General Theory of Relativity"). Which was itself seriously denigrated by a number of well known scientists back in 1935, when it was first published. Including the famous 2 page article in the New York Times on July 11th 1935, by none other than Nikola Tesla. And the work of the then well known Research Scientist Professor Miller. Who developed a incontrovertible Laboratory test for that daft theory, and proved it was nothing more than pure nonsense. Indeed Miller, went as far as dismantling the smoke screen (the Mathematics) revealing that even the famous E=mc2, is itself fundamentally flawed. The "m" being the mistake !!!!

    • @RussellColeman-p2w
      @RussellColeman-p2w หลายเดือนก่อน

      Einstein is the biggest fraud of the 20th century. He couldn't hold Tesla's clipboard.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      that is complete nonsense! the likes show that none of the punters here have ever even seen these equations

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@railwaymechanicalengineer4587 mr antisemitism is back

    • @WW-bt3tx
      @WW-bt3tx หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x “The special theory of relativity owes its origin to Maxwell’s Equations of the electromagnetic field.” Edward Schilpp’s 'Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist' - Library of Living Philosophers, 1949. Page 62 (in the German version).
      There's more:
      "As for the origin of the formula, it wasn’t until five years before his death (1955) that Einstein publicly attributed the basis of E = mc2 to the 1862 charge-momentum field equations of James Clerk Maxwell"
      "Albert Einstein, Out of My Later Years" - Philosophical Library, New York, 1950, viii.
      The only one spouting nonsense is you.

  • @duderama6750
    @duderama6750 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Why files is the YT version of Mythbusters. A disinfo psyop.

    • @NGC-catseye
      @NGC-catseye หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fear the crabcat 😸

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hear, Hear!

    • @NGC-catseye
      @NGC-catseye หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@j.pershing2197 Hello John, I hope you are doing well ⚡

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@duderama6750 NGC
      I am thank you. Just got over pnuemonia. Hope you and yours are content and healthy.

    • @benwinter2420
      @benwinter2420 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Adam the ginger Einstein from Mysthbusters said in private interview . . that folks should be banned from disputing on any media , anything contrary to the in his eyes settled science of man made carbon release = global warming/cooling WTF flavor of WEF month / / mount Etna volcano released thousands of times more life regreening . . mad sinister puppets mafia

  • @GIFTGAS88
    @GIFTGAS88 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    ⚡⚡

  • @SciD1
    @SciD1 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Gravity is electrostatic. It's one of the manifestations of the Aether.

    • @tisithecount4198
      @tisithecount4198 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Wouldn’t charged objects fall at different rates then?

    • @SciD1
      @SciD1 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @tisithecount4198 it's a function of density of matter. All atoms are tiny dipoles.

    • @tisithecount4198
      @tisithecount4198 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @ but what about matter with net charges? Two identical density items, one positively charged (net) and one net negatively charged should not only fall at different rates, but wouldn’t one fall “up?”

    • @SciD1
      @SciD1 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@tisithecount4198 no such thing as positive or negative charge"s" . There's charge (+) and discharge (-). Aether (charge) is constantly flowing through matter. The Aether is static until it it's in the presence of matter.

    • @tisithecount4198
      @tisithecount4198 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @ making stuff up is fun huh?!

  • @Kook-a-mal
    @Kook-a-mal หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Infinite Funding Machine!
    That’s great 🤔

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep, a perpetual funding machine.

  • @philoso377
    @philoso377 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Nice video and presentation.
    There is nothing in this equation : F = G*(m1*m2)/r² : that suggest gravity force originates from matter.

    • @bobann3566
      @bobann3566 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gravity is not a force, it is an anti force, originating of an aether disturbance, specifically, it is the anti force, anti field return vector we call, ACCELERATION

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bobann3566 Not according to anyone familiar with physics.

    • @bobann3566
      @bobann3566 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 True but that does not mean that I am wrong. Just look at a falling ball. Do you see any force there? I only see acceleration which is the opposite of force. I know this is true because when I throw that ball up in the air, that is the force, but I can see no force returning it.
      Its like hitting a still pool of water, a force of motion is disturbed, we call it a wave, and that wave then accelerates back to stillness.
      Gravity is the return vector after the force vector has been spent.
      Physicists need to catch up to the rest of us, unfortunately, the Government has captured them with Grants, pensions and salaries. Self Interest Governs all human behavior, even Physicists.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bobann3566 _"True but that does not mean that I am wrong"_
      I'm afraid it does if your conjecture only exists as a youtube comment. Physicist know gravity precisely enough to make predictions (and get them right), and to use it to plot the orbits of spacecraft years in advance, and even using it in-flight with gravity assists from planets. And without it being caused by mass we would not have confirmed time dilation, as predicted by Einstein, in numerous experiments. Including the very first GPS satellite, NAVSTAR, IN 1977. Time dilation in GPS has to be accounted for. And mass and velocity have time dilation effects that are opposite in sign to each other. All of which was calculated by physicists before NAVSTAR even launched. And then they let it fly for ~ 20 days without correction. Guess what? The physicists were right, and the people who said corrections would not be needed (engineers) were wrong.
      _"Physicists need to catch up to the rest of us,"_
      You mean the non-physicists and mythologists of EU? Lol.
      _"unfortunately, the Government has captured them with Grants, pensions and salaries. Self Interest Governs all human behavior, even Physicists."_
      The usual crackpot word salad and conspiritard nonsense expected from creationists and flat earthers. Change the record and do some science.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davejones7632 what on earth do they _want_ ? do they want David "we still have a lot to learn about gravity" Drew to be in charge of the next mission to the outer solar system?

  • @carlubambi5541
    @carlubambi5541 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Awesome .looking into some Spyroe theory .Seen a few clips on that and it's gone

  • @nickprohoroff3720
    @nickprohoroff3720 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My suspicions are getting the better of me about the Why Files.

  • @Snailmailtrucker
    @Snailmailtrucker หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I was a Fan of The Why Files and I enjoyed the episode AJ did about The Electric Universe right up until he Straight out Lied about Wal Thornhill and his absolutely Perfect predictions about that July 4th approach and contact and brilliant Flash on that Comet. I left a Comment that day at The Why Files on my Disgust with his Flagrant Lie about Thornhill and I gave AJ a Thumbs Down and Unsubscribed from his TH-cam Channel. I have been back since !

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Shoemaker Levy 9
      I saw that and he lied like crazy after that

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      _"Straight out Lied about Wal Thornhill and his absolutely Perfect predictions about that July 4th approach and contact and brilliant Flash on that Comet."_
      Thornhill was the one that lied. He got nothing right about the Tempel 1 impact and mission. No electrical flash, as shown by a number of instruments that observed the impact in the very wavelengths where the mythologist Thornhill said his impossible flash would be seen. It didn't happen. And he knew it didn't happen. So, he lied. Just as he lied by omission by not mentioning that thousands of tonnes of ice grains were ejected by that impact.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@j.pershing2197 I think you'll find that Thornhill was the liar.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 orthodox trash that kid

    • @Snailmailtrucker
      @Snailmailtrucker 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@davejones7632
      *You Think....hahaha...Not much of a chance of that happening !*

  • @DaveAtlas
    @DaveAtlas หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I asked AI to fit a model to physics that removes the idea of General Relativity completely. I would post it here if I could... I replaced time as a fundamental construct with time as an emergent property of space and motion, the output of the function space x motion... This changes most of current cosmology because most of it is based on GR...Interestingly, AI had no problem re-creating primary physics formulas with this idea, noting that it conceptually works fine with every main idea... with the only caveat that it won't fit into any current framework and will need it's own...

    • @DaveAtlas
      @DaveAtlas หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Then we had a nice conversation about the restrictive nature of frameworks in general...

    • @demonmonsterdave
      @demonmonsterdave 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@DaveAtlas its *

  • @acetate909
    @acetate909 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I pointed out the mistakes in The Why Files EU episode and they blocked me from posting and deleted my comment.
    My comment wasn't aggressive or derogatory. I simply corrected their many mistakes one by one in a very straight forward manner without any insults or nasty language. I even ended the comment by saying I was a massive fan of the channel and I simply wanted to make sure the audience received an accurate account of the EU theory. But apparently the episode was an intentional smear piece and the channel didn't want the audience to know they were intentionally deceived.
    Since that episode I've lost a lot of respect for the channel and now that I know they're not as unbiased as they claim I've started to notice their subtle agenda in every video.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Maybe you're starting to figure out these shiny glossy vids aren't about telling the truth.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      EU has no science. Simple.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 the opposite then kid bbt no science just lying and incompetent

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@trungtamienmayquocquang7233 Gibberish.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 orthodox trash that kid

  • @jonbigman9723
    @jonbigman9723 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wal had it right! But for one thing. We live in a dynamic environment. He was describing the structure of particles within our atmosphere that act like grounding rods and lets Plasma from the Sun follow it downward as it loses charge going to the ground which it sees as a vacuum or sink. Gravity is nothing more then charges going to ground via the structures that grow around a planet with an atmosphere(suspended particles) of any kind.
    We can not look at these systems without including that we can not stop time in reality and dynamically we have to include it in our theories. That means flows and motion of charges Out of the Source, in our view is the Sun. Plasma is dynamic and flows with fluid dynamics in its nature. If plasma is to be understood we need to understand that potentials attract and condense plasma. That even includes all matter. Our planet has many many layers of condensed plasma sitting between every piece of matter. We can vary that density between matter by raising the potential of matter. Or in the case of getting the energy out we only need to apply a potential enough to cause a discharge of plasma after

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Plasma physics isn't your strong point, is it? Rhetorical.

  • @mnemonyss
    @mnemonyss หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice video! 🎉 really enjoyed the reminders

  • @KennethKustren-lr6tg
    @KennethKustren-lr6tg หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    HOW MANY BILLIONS OF HOURS, DOLLARS, AND SECONDS OF TIME ... DOES IT TAKE TO BUILD A PARTICLE YOU CANNOT SEE ?

    • @Bobany
      @Bobany หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It only takes a little mathematical horseplay to piece together lacking physics theories

    • @ArchonOne
      @ArchonOne หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As long as they’re making money, they’ll keep pretending to be scientists.

    • @Saturn-Matrix
      @Saturn-Matrix หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Freemasons building portals to their deities

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Classic reification.

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now you understand why DoD is missing $830B in just 2024 and has failed the last 7 audits. NASA is similar. Trillions and we get camp fires on the sun

  • @gamebent
    @gamebent 11 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you.

  • @StephenGoodfellow
    @StephenGoodfellow หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nice summary.

  • @lmwlmw4468
    @lmwlmw4468 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Great video.

  • @CartmanSandiego
    @CartmanSandiego หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Forget about the why files, dudes a grifter and a bumb. Talks to himself....as a fish....

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I enjoy the show, but it seems to have gone downhill since the EU episode, strangely. Long breaks between episodes, numerous compilations of earlier shows, and a general lack of the old verve.

  • @efdangotu
    @efdangotu หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Every dimension beyond *LIGHT REFRACTION* = show me the math

  • @dodruaidh9146
    @dodruaidh9146 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    These are matters of some gravity.

  • @kristimcgowandarkoscellard3126
    @kristimcgowandarkoscellard3126 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I swear that so called “black hole image” looks like a zoomed in out of focus image of a lit 🔥 cigarette to me!! 😱🤦🏼‍♀️🤣😜

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤣It could well be. It sure as hell ain't no black hole.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Maybe it's another piece of pepperoni

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@daviddrew7852 Yes it is. And you have no other explanation for it.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 understand kid or are you brainless and don't understand anything

  • @2550205
    @2550205 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    9:15
    The laws of Geometry must then be considered to be , not among the laws of "mathematics" period.
    This supports the rest of the idea presented here that everything Uncle Al put down on paper is, in his words,
    a nice fantasy that has certainly had its day in the sun and is now well overdue for its trip to the circular file.
    Along the way forward the people who have done their homework need to reclassify the nonsense that is all
    considered and called mathematics into math magic the entertainment meant for those who enjoy bending the
    mind for a bend minded thrill and Arith math it ic the arithmetic that works well when the base is kept consistent
    and the operator is tuned into the tone of the tome at the tone of the sun

  • @KennethKustren-lr6tg
    @KennethKustren-lr6tg หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Gràvity ... not without a mass of body

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is mass? What is gravity?

    • @KennethKustren-lr6tg
      @KennethKustren-lr6tg หลายเดือนก่อน

      @daviddrew7852 Mass equals size, density and momentum . GRAVITY IS AN ELECTRICAL BYPRODUCT AFFECTING 2 OR MORE OBJECTS IN A SYSTEM .

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@KennethKustren-lr6tg Lol.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 study physics and you will know more

  • @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858
    @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    In Larson's Reciprocal Systems Theory of Space and Time, gravity in the space-time sector is attractive, but in the (reciprocal) time-space sector (faster than light), gravity is a repulsive force.
    He says much most akin to the electrical theory. An important key is that Unity, the speed of light, is that from which all forces are measured. Light is made of electricity and magnetism, that is, space and time. Time is 3 dimensional. There are two sectors -- the material sector is slower than light, the cosmic sector is faster than light. Reciprocal to a T. A deductive theory. The unified theory mainstream science claims to be searching for (and I believe you are).

    • @efdangotu
      @efdangotu หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dang. I like this one.

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I understand it as a squeezing force

  • @whatdoiknowsmith
    @whatdoiknowsmith หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great video. How do so called smart people believe that everything in existence was created from an infinitely hot dense point? Magic is not a law of physics. Yet it is at the forefront of relativity.

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Big Bang is creationism with the clock put back.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Turns out they ain't so smart.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 no, not at all - at least try to understand the science you purport to be commenting on

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x No need for you to object, doing unnecessary things is the forte of incompetent people like you.

  • @mboyer68
    @mboyer68 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I really enjoy the why files and was so excited when the EUT episode came out. He missed more than he included. I emailed the why files that night telling them to look into a number of things that would change their position, and that with such a large platform, they had the ability to change scientific understanding for the better, and beg them to look into it further. But never heard back and they've never changed their position. That really sucked because they could've helped push truth very far.

  • @raymondrhudy8681
    @raymondrhudy8681 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I haven't watched wf? Since that episode!

  • @mmascientific
    @mmascientific หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent

  • @klind57
    @klind57 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    100,000 plasma bits are coalesced into one hydrogen atom. The electric spin on fire.
    Doug Voht

  • @Capt.Turner
    @Capt.Turner หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for your latest entry, David. Great job.
    Before his untimely death, Wal was mentioning on numerous occasions, that he was working on his book about his all-encompassing theory.
    Do you know, if he was able to finish his book and will it ever see the light of day ? Thx.

    • @playfulplanets1697
      @playfulplanets1697 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The book is still in the works. Keep an eye on the TB website.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@playfulplanets1697 that should be interesting... all-encompassing, eh?

  • @dextermorgan1
    @dextermorgan1 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm not intelligent enough or educated enough to understand most of what is said in these videos, but I know they are likely correct. Just from what I know, cosmology, is incorrect. Many of the theories put forth by mainstream science don't add up to somebody like me, who uses common sense as opposed to "book smarts". I can't tell you why I feel electric Universe model is correct but I would bet my last dollar that it is.

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The EU does not claim to have all the answers, but we are on the right track to be sure.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not smart, but I believe these people telling me lies on yt. OK then.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@daviddrew7852 Not even close. Nothing EU proposes is even possible, and you cannot point to anything that is possible. No science, no scientists.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 orthodox trash that kid

  • @DeathValleyDazed
    @DeathValleyDazed หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love thus content👏

  • @Dlweta57
    @Dlweta57 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fabulous

  • @classicalmechanic8914
    @classicalmechanic8914 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The reason why curved spacetime does not cause equal and opposite force is gravity is just a map of spacetime, which can be curved only from the perspective of observer.

    • @FVLMEN
      @FVLMEN หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Timespace is the map of timespace. Gravity is its distortion. A rubber sheet analogy only works because of gravity. That analogy doesn’t work in outer space where a ball doesn’t press against the rubber because there’s no gravity, the very thing they try to explain using the rubber sheet itself, yet GR posits that the warping of timespace fabric is why things fall. It clearly doesn’t explain anything. That paradox 1. If were a membrane its distortion would still not cause things to accelerate any direction let alone the one way direction of GR gravity.
      Then you have to consider that steel ball on a rubber sheet warps the sheet “downward” which we know is a concept tied to the direction which gravity accelerates things towards earth and doesn’t truly exist. So when space is distorted, is it being pressed down in 4th dimensional sense and if so why not pressed upward? Why downward? We’ve already established that on the rubber we have gravity accelerating things towards the earth which the rubber sheet is keeping the ball from doing hence the distortion on it. Is there a 4D earth accelerating our 3D earth “downward” against our 3D timespace rubber sheet? Paradox 2.
      Paradox 3 is you can make up an infinite amount of dimensions as soon as you say our timespace is just the skin on a 4D bubble. That bubble is a 4D object floating in a 4D timespace that’s the skin on a 5D bubble etc.

    • @classicalmechanic8914
      @classicalmechanic8914 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FVLMEN Gravity is the map because force is absolute. Everything moving relative to this absolute map of spacetime is relative.

    • @bobann3566
      @bobann3566 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then why does a ball thrown in the air, curve back towards the ground? There is a curve in the vector and space is just the end point of the force vector and the beginning point of the accelerative return back to power.

    • @classicalmechanic8914
      @classicalmechanic8914 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bobann3566 From the perspective of person who threw the ball, ball falls down due to gravity. From the perspective of the ball, it is stationary until Earth accelerates up into it. Both interpretations are correct.

    • @FVLMEN
      @FVLMEN หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@classicalmechanic8914 I help you out again. Timespace is the map of timespace. Gravity is if anything are roads. And please there is no such thing as space as a fabric. Space is not made of material. Space is illusory.

  • @plamenzlatev1206
    @plamenzlatev1206 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    6:33 ... Tesla was right , curved spaces will uncurve space ... here the punch line is that is space only , spacetime is Einstein (the first modern demi-god of science) fiction !

  • @j.pershing2197
    @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why files even went so far as to say Wal wasnt educated and nobody could find where he studied. Then they said there is no math to support the theory. Lastly, they said he was intentionally spreading misinformation.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He had no education in anything relevant. And there is no maths to support the impossible claims of the mythologists of EU. And Thornhill certainly did spew out a load of disinformation. Every time he opened his mouth!

  • @jeffbush7764
    @jeffbush7764 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Consensus = Group think

  • @jesperandersson889
    @jesperandersson889 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A centrifugal experience - anybuddy up for the task of derailing cetrifugal deviation?

  • @barrydysert2974
    @barrydysert2974 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    ⚡⚡⚡🙏💜🙏⚡⚡⚡

  • @WilliamWilliamster
    @WilliamWilliamster หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I would like the EU to cover plasma topics as reported in the book A New Science of Heaven by Robert Temple, (I used the audio book), i.e., crystalline dusty plasmas. Also Malcolm Bendall's work with plasmoid technology which is demonstrating practical open source, as opposed to SAFIRE, applications for clean energy, clean internal combustion tech, and radioactive cleanup. th-cam.com/video/4AbTU9MBre0/w-d-xo.html
    th-cam.com/video/yN5fz8QgDuY/w-d-xo.html

    • @j.pershing2197
      @j.pershing2197 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fkn SOROS bought in heavily to the Safire project. This tech will be patented then shelved

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@j.pershing2197 paranoid nonsense - safire has no tech, their results are phoney

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x Sure enough a stupid parrot is trying to preach theory I am a parrot besides being lazy very incompetent and useless like orthodox theologists

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x 1 nonsense paranoia of self-proclaimed theologians bbt

  • @andyman8630
    @andyman8630 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    gravity is a 'vector field' resulting from the mutual resonance between the electric and magnetic fields of *every atom* even though some atoms lack a *magnetic moment*
    gravity is local! that is it keeps you on the planet! but gravity plays no more part in stellar/planetary orbits than it does in atomic 'orbits'
    there is no part of the universe *which is not electric!* piezo effect, static, life, aurora, ionosphere, magnetosphere,,, etc
    edit: the "aether" is in fact *the EM soup* which permeates every portion of the entire universe! space is by no means 'void' it is in fact chock full and brimming with EM energy

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol. Learn physics.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 the brainless guy is back

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davejones7632
      seriously? that's all you've got? no counterpoint? no counter argument? no refutation? no facts? no data? no evidence? and no *truth?*
      just a baseless "appeal to authority" you cannot cite?
      so in essence, you've got *NOTHING?*

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andyman8630 he is right though, you need to learn physics before you are able to comment meaningfully on any of this

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andyman8630 _"no counterpoint? no counter argument? no refutation? no facts? no data? no evidence? and no truth?"_
      Everything I say is backed up by a mountain of observations and experimental evidence, all published in the scientific literature. Nothing you say has any scientific validity, and does not exist in the scientific literature. For a reason - it isn't science. It has as much scientific validity as flat earth and creationism.

  • @Genome69420
    @Genome69420 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    where specifically is this quote from? "we do not see the signal. if it existed, we would see it. but when we look at our data, we basically se nothing" dmitri denisov

  • @timothy8426
    @timothy8426 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Magnetic fields are bonded together. Electricity is rapid heat exchanging through mass faster than the normal farther reaching magnetic field. Meteorites hit our atmosphere faster than earth's quantum internal magnetic fields grounding currents and Meteorites disolving into external heat energy outside of entanglement of mass like campfires slowly disolving internal magnetic fields disolving into external heat energy outside of entanglement of mass. Lightning is rapid heat loss as disolving atmospheric gases into external heat energy like campfires instantaneously disolving mass as fire lighting up the sky instantaneously. Magnetism is centrifugal forces of unification of unidirectional currents flowing synchronization. What force caused gravity? Magnetic fields grounding currents through all masses in its path until displacement can't be overcome by impaction force of magnetism as illusionary solidity. Isn't it funny how mass disolves as external heat energy outside of entanglement of mass from stars decaying their atmospheric gasses as heat waves outside of entanglement of MASS. Cold space and heat as space is a weak external magnetic field filled with dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass. Currents flowing through and around mass everywhere. Tornadoes, hurricanes, and whirlpools are currents flowing from magnetism equalization of pressure. The closer to the core of the fire force increases and distance decreases. Magnetism. External heat energy outside of entanglement of mass doesn't ground currents. Hot air balloons prove hypothesis. External magnetic fields spinning all external heat energy within its field like a record on a record player centrifugal force of magnetism flowing currents quantumized around these massive monopoles of pure fabric of cold space as counterclockwise and clockwise as magnetism. The earth spinning is not coincidence that it's both clockwise and counterclockwise. Galaxies prove hypothesis as accretion disks surrounding external magnetic fields as outward force of pressure in equalization to magnetism. Magnetism passes through all mass including lead. Heavier elements sink to the bottom of the pool or core where external heat energy force is strongest. The closer to the core of the middle of a rapidly moving river more force of impact force of pressure. The same way magnets work. Magnetic fields affect each other as repulsion and bonding synchronization. Magnets are both clockwise and counterclockwise, repulsion and synchronization of bonding currents. Magnets will spin around if you put a stronger magnetic field by it. Fact. Mass falls through magnetic fields equalization to repulsion and bonding force.

  • @W.13th
    @W.13th หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tbh, you _should_ blame the WhyFiles. They weren't mislead. They're too mindful for that. They *choose* their information, wisely.

  • @kzziggy
    @kzziggy หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Uranus needs electricity 😂

  • @Shadowmaster625
    @Shadowmaster625 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It seems like it should be easy to prove if every atom subject to gravity is forming a dipole.

  • @jh2666
    @jh2666 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i hate gravity, it just weighs me down

  • @RobertMStahl
    @RobertMStahl หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    hbar = h / 2pi
    &c, hydrino

  • @Truthagainsttheworld8430
    @Truthagainsttheworld8430 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'm surprised we've accomplished as much as we have with these lame ideas of gravity.

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Although math-based models are only descriptive, they can still be useful. Orthodox science does not understand the mechanism behind gravity. The door must, therefore, be left open to other ideas.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, like density and buoyancy.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@daviddrew7852 _"The door must, therefore, be left open to other ideas."_
      EU doesn't have any.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 _all_ science is "only descriptive" when it comes down to it, but some descriptions are more all-encompassing and insightful; if you think you have science that goes beyond "merely descriptive" you should retake epistemology 101

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davejones7632 to think that our utterly wrong non-electrical misguided physics even allows us to manipulate the weather so that the Trump heartland is struck by droughts and tornadoes...

  • @Varatheraj
    @Varatheraj 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    its not just gravity. there are many others not dreamt up by their own intelligentsia.

  • @Thebrightat
    @Thebrightat หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The powers that be suppress this model knowing it would lead to anti gravity technology.

    • @JimmyMatis-h9y
      @JimmyMatis-h9y หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yup. Ever since the military/intelligence community got involved in physics (Manhattan project), the field has become science fiction. I wouldn't be at all surprised if your comment is 💯% accurate.

    • @tisithecount4198
      @tisithecount4198 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Thebrightat wouldn’t the powers that be want that too? Why wouldn’t they want an advanced technology they could control?

    • @Thebrightat
      @Thebrightat หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @tisithecount4198 they already have it. UAV previously known as UFO.

    • @ArchonOne
      @ArchonOne หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They ready have it. That’s what those UFOs are.

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to wonder.

  • @principiadiscordia111
    @principiadiscordia111 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I love the Martin Rees quote. "What causes gravity and mass? These questions still baffle all of us. Rather than the 'end of science' being nigh, we are still near the beginning of the cosmic quest."

  • @GregoryBirulkin
    @GregoryBirulkin หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The hadron collider a perpetual funding machine.
    Doesn't the hedron collider distort the Earth's magnetic field?

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some worried it might create a black hole, but there is no need to worry. They do not exist.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 ... he asserted dogmatically.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      what's a hedron?

  • @brankorichardbabic5914
    @brankorichardbabic5914 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do I attach photos with posts?

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can't attach pics to TH-cam replies besides the emojis they provide.

  • @batfly
    @batfly หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Elon Musk's Rocket technology is impressive. There is no denying this. However, humans need to develop technology beyond Newtonian physics before humans can travel the stars. Space, matter, electromagnetism, gravity (the sum of all aligned subatomic dipoles in matter), time and time dilation are all puzzle pieces for FTL (faster than light) intergalactic space craft. The EU (Electric Universe) community has better observations of the universe to begin putting the puzzle pieces together. This may lead to the day we escape the Petri dish of the Earth and the solar system. If Extraterrestrials, or whatever they are, already traveling the cosmos, don't transfer this technology to humans, then it will be the scientific observations and discoveries of the EU community that will... some day.

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We will need to escape the solar system if the Sun flares significantly. Living on Mars won't help us.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Redoing something from the 50s? I say it's not impressive at all. As a matter of fact, "you can tell its real because of how fake it looks"

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 gosh, do you seriously believe even a word you are saying?

  • @YawnGod
    @YawnGod หลายเดือนก่อน

    a8rhx4vrka0 Video isn't available anymore.

  • @johnbreen5668
    @johnbreen5668 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    No wonder democrats don't make sense. They still do the opposite of whatever Friedman said. Friedman said socialism is bad democrats sail let give it a hug. Friedman thinks science is important democrats decide men make the best women😂

    • @ArchonOne
      @ArchonOne หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Funny as it is, it is indicative of the way narrative has crept into science. We know we can’t trust our expert class anymore because large swaths of them proved beyond a shadow of doubt they will not question authority, and just about all influential authority was honey-potted by Epstien. I propose the standard model is an intentional fraud intended to halt scientific progress. The average astrophysics may be a believer, but it’s who wrote the textbooks you must be concerned with.

    • @Saturn-Matrix
      @Saturn-Matrix หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree but it's all a hegilian dialectic for sheeple who know nothing about the constitution. Freemasonic banking mafia controls both sides ultimately for socialism

    • @shodan6401
      @shodan6401 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @johnbreen5668
      Are you on drugs, Mate? Your sentences don't make any sense. No idea what you're talking about. Maybe try pulling Trump's sack out of your mouth next time?

    • @shodan6401
      @shodan6401 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @johnbreen5668
      Are you on drugs, Mate? Your sentences don't make any sense. No idea what you're talking about. Maybe try pulling DJ's sack out of your mouth next time?

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Science has become ideological and political.

  • @fyrerayne8882
    @fyrerayne8882 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    How can they accurately sift through all of that noisy data from the LHC?

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Why don't you read the papers?

    • @ThienLuu-n3i
      @ThienLuu-n3i 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@davejones7632 Do you have the latest update yet, kid?

    • @heiniknallkopp9688
      @heiniknallkopp9688 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Because these people know their stuff and how to do science.

    • @ThienLuu-n3i
      @ThienLuu-n3i 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@heiniknallkopp9688 NASA Quacks🤪

  • @Killer_Kovacs
    @Killer_Kovacs หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    7:46 🙄

  • @victorialadybug1
    @victorialadybug1 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When they first presented that doughnut blackhole photo I believed from the first that it was false!

  • @markhughes7927
    @markhughes7927 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    12:52
    Well observed! Were I to stand beside Einstein in space and activate an on/off switch on a laser pointing back at me some 30 light seconds away by pulling a piece of string - while Einstein activated one next to it and pointing back at him by a car-fob pulse beam (consonant with his theory of speed-limitation) my laser-light would arrive in 30 seconds and his in 60 seconds!

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      how do you reckon that? are you assuming that your pulling force will be transmitted instantaneously along the string?

    • @markhughes7927
      @markhughes7927 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @
      ‘Pulling force’ is not ‘transmitted’ - the molecules are in line tension along the string (taut) at the beginning of the exercise and make the laser switch contiguous with the hand pulling the string 30 light seconds away. The example illustrates - or intends to - Fuller’s ‘tensional integrity’ which - in his geodetic modelling of nature - counteracts unitarially all radiative fractions of Universe…(and which conception implies that Einstein’s way of seeing Universe was only half the story and improperly modelled).

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markhughes7927 so it is indeed your contention that the force travels down the string at infinite speed, due to it being taut and its molecules in line tension?

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x Without knowledge, orthodox people like you only know how to talk nonsense, you are really incompetent.

    • @markhughes7927
      @markhughes7927 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @
      Chap! - it cannot be turned on except at the very moment it IS turned on! - and at that moment counting starts 1 - 30 seconds!

  • @songmoshan
    @songmoshan 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yes. It is a mess, to quote John Lennon: "Your a failure scientist...mad scientist" - HELP!

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Lennon had better grammar than that.

    • @ThienLuu-n3i
      @ThienLuu-n3i 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3xlol

    • @songmoshan
      @songmoshan 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x "Human see; human do!" Dr. Zaius - "Planet of the Apes.

  • @christophvonknobelsdorff1936
    @christophvonknobelsdorff1936 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can you animate the magnetic field lines off our sunsystem , between sun , some planets with moons in motiion ?

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's a remarkably complex task.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@daviddrew7852 it's pretty easy, actually, although it would surprise me if you were up to it

    • @SciD1
      @SciD1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are no "lines" of anything.

    • @playfulplanets1697
      @playfulplanets1697 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SciD1 Well, like lines of latitude and longitude on a map, they are artifacts.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@playfulplanets1697 not what artefact means

  • @glenwaldrop8166
    @glenwaldrop8166 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just wanted to add, modern science treats Einstein's work as infallible, Einstein himself was trying to unify magnetism and gravity until the day he died, he just couldn't work it out in time.
    Einstein wasn't full of himself, the people that idolize him are the problem.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      _modern science treats Einstein's work as infallible_ not true, however, the relativity part has withstood the test of time pretty well
      _Einstein himself was trying to unify magnetism and gravity until the day he died_ One way of putting it, but nobody thinks he had a GUT or that he was on track where others weren't

    • @ThienLuu-n3i
      @ThienLuu-n3i 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x So just keep spewing trolls with no knowledge is how you comment

  • @shodan6401
    @shodan6401 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The phrase "Bennett Pinch" is used repeatedly. I think this is actually referring to a Birkeland Z-pinch? Or is there a Bennett who has contributed to the hypothesis of whom I am unaware?

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      See 01:58 to 02:01 where this is explained.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 hardly

  • @JJ33438
    @JJ33438 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for another educational video. I agree with the EU theory. It answers questions that the Gravity model cannot answer. I too was wondering about the black hole pictures somehow they seemed not right. I do hope Europe boycotts the expanding of the LHC basically we don't need it and building larger versions of it can present certain theorized dangers. Billions and Bilions of tax money spent to find "maybe particles" how does that benefit the tax payers? Thank you for a good video.

  • @piotrprs572
    @piotrprs572 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's rly funny to watch this video. In one side we have laugh about dark mater or particles without charge. (it can be understandable)
    But in other hand... no one even think about CHARGE itself!! What is it? How it can be explain in as basic force in 'ether' medium?
    Sure, we can 'cut' much.. much nonsense in current phisics, like dark mater, energy, BH, neutron stars, spacetime, etc.. etc. But we 'stop' at charge, plus/minus poles and electro-magnetic fields. We can't stop at this, we need 'push' it even further. Because if we don't do this, we still have some 'magic forces' appear. 🙂

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is difficult to avoid metaphysics, but the EU admits its shortcomings. Yes, we have much more to learn about EM and the aether. Orthodox science, meanwhile, spouts certainty despite relying on reification.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 I think you might have a ways to go admitting your shortcomings, in particular as to who exactly is doing the reification

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x "I think you might have a ways to go..." It would help if you worked on your English, too.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 it was perfectly good English

  • @holgerjrgensen2166
    @holgerjrgensen2166 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will is Mind-Power, Gravity is Stuff-Power,
    Basic of the Stuff, is Heat and Freeze,
    Electricity is the Effect of Heat and Freeze.
    But the Life-Desire is the Ultimate Life-Power/Force,
    Will and Gravity is a direct extension of the Life-Desire.
    Our Consciousness is 100% Electric,
    all Stuff is Degrees and Compositions of woven Electricity.

  • @TheLastOilMan
    @TheLastOilMan หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The BS has been nailed to its cross, by those big square rusty nails our fore fathers so loved !

  • @fictitiousart6410
    @fictitiousart6410 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s like comparing the extensive research that supports plasma physics to cartoon analogies of Pee Wee’s playhouse.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yet not a single plasma physicist on the planet subscribes to your impossible nonsense. And you don't have anyone with a clue about the subject.

  • @dorhinj23
    @dorhinj23 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Of course there could be mass that doesn't interact with em, or does so passively; there have to be insulators, as well as capcitors, relays etc, for the em to effect - let's call it 'Dark æther'... 😅

  • @brankorichardbabic5914
    @brankorichardbabic5914 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is the 3rd (third) perturbation, at 45 deg to the electric and magnetic vectors, Gravity? All these particulates are directly aligned with the Earth's Magnetic field? see : Photo attached

    • @FVLMEN
      @FVLMEN หลายเดือนก่อน

      What the kcuf do you mean by perturbation. Make sense

  • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
    @physicswithpark3r-x3x 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    3:05 You are fond of mentioning this - so does it ever occur to you guys that this alone completely _invalidates_ your theories?

    • @ThienLuu-n3i
      @ThienLuu-n3i 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So just keep spewing trolls with no knowledge is how you comment

  • @larsulrik1699
    @larsulrik1699 หลายเดือนก่อน

    response to FVLMEN: modern orthodox science teaches that the ground is accelerating. But since it(the ground) constitutes the surface of a globe, it's also not accelerating. Because if the surface of a globe is constantly accelerating in an outward direction, it would result in this globe constantly expanding at an accelerating rate. And that doesn't seem to be happening. So this acceleration is actually something that goes on a in a 4th dimension. So the ground is both accelerating and not accelerating at the same time.
    And this is what mordern orthodox actually teaches. and you're the one who's igonorant about this.

  • @dadsonworldwide3238
    @dadsonworldwide3238 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No one ever says that gaining weight is spooky action at a distance or has any issues with how eating objects increases your mass inertia.
    If economic power was not so intertwined here perhaps we wouldn't behave this way over gravity either
    It's hard to reason when it's nothing to reason in measured values that wouldn't be present without emerging energetic actors in the first place.
    Can't qauntize or even renormalize infinite nothingness that isn't there otherwise.
    If it was fundamental it would already be hard why mapping

  • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
    @physicswithpark3r-x3x 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Talk about misconceptions: every few second something about "the math does not work out" - sorry, but it does. It is rather an advanced subject, and it does not go away because it is too hard for you.
    Chaos does not mean the end of mathematics, it is a whole field of maths in its own right.
    Ditto for non-linear phenomena.

    • @ThienLuu-n3i
      @ThienLuu-n3i 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      An advanced subject and every few seconds you spew troll comments that prove you know nothing but brag that shows you are idiots who don't update information and are just incompetently conservative

  • @markhughes7927
    @markhughes7927 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .. 6:33 am I right in thinking that Newton described gravity as a general effect and that Einstein described gravity as a particular thing..? (chalk and cheese)

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      not in any real sense, but probably in a kook sense that would pass muster here

    • @NotableHeroicFailures
      @NotableHeroicFailures หลายเดือนก่อน

      Newton conceded he did not understand the mechanism behind gravity. He could only describe it mathematically. Einstein replaced a mathematical description with a mathematical abstraction (alleged space-time curvature).

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NotableHeroicFailures _replaced a mathematical description with a mathematical abstraction_ is there a difference?

  • @wesbaumguardner8829
    @wesbaumguardner8829 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I do not think that mass actually exists. If anything, it is a third or higher order emergent property of the aether field. Take water, for instance. Liquid water is heavier than both solid water (ice) and water vapor. So, gravity is actually working on each phase of water differently. Does that mean that water's mass changes with temperature?

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You commented before that matter can create and destroy that is wrong my friend

    • @wesbaumguardner8829
      @wesbaumguardner8829 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 1) I most certainly did not make that comment. 2) This comment is not about matter. It is about the alleged property of matter called mass.

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wesbaumguardner8829 Do you remember the law of conservation of mass? This law is being edited by the bbt to the point of being a joke. That's why they say the standard model is just incompetent and greedy.

    • @wesbaumguardner8829
      @wesbaumguardner8829 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@trungtamienmayquocquang7233 I reject the standard model in its entirety.

    • @davejones7632
      @davejones7632 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No such thing as 'aether field'.

  • @AshleyGraetz
    @AshleyGraetz หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Source.

  • @jerrybowen2869
    @jerrybowen2869 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Fascinating! Thanks. The gyroscope proves that a specially designed object with a spinning magnetic field easily resists the "urge" to tip over. Makes me wonder what else can be accomplished by counteracting the magnetic pull. Who was that talked about (conductive) mercury circulating around a ring at high speeds? I'm guessing our (out of control, mysterious) military has cracked the code, at least to some degree. Would a person weigh less if descending toward the center of the earth?

  • @moonlitrn1
    @moonlitrn1 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Gravity is the surface tension of space...objects of mass distort the tension of space like a water spiders legs distort the surface tension of water.....the water tries to level the water out... holding the spider suspended......gravity does the same with mass

  • @safffff1000
    @safffff1000 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I need a better description how gravity works

    • @daviddrew7852
      @daviddrew7852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It remains largely mysterious, as per this video. We still have a lot to learn.

    • @physicswithpark3r-x3x
      @physicswithpark3r-x3x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daviddrew7852 you certainly do

    • @trungtamienmayquocquang7233
      @trungtamienmayquocquang7233 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@physicswithpark3r-x3x
      NO ONE IS TALKING TO YOU STOP TALKING BULLSHIT AND SHUT UP AND THE NEXT STEP IS TO GET OUT OF HERE

  • @FloydD.Barber
    @FloydD.Barber หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gravity is electric.
    An atom behaves as an LC oscillator circuit.
    Gravity is hole flow into the atom.
    The release of electromagnetic energy from the atom is electron flow.
    Space is a thing.
    Acceleration of a mass relative to space induces a force on that mass called inertia.
    Accelerating space relative to a mass induces a force on that mass called gravity.
    Gravity is caused by space accelerating towards atoms.
    A mass falling towards Earth is not accelerating relative to space, it is at rest with space and that space is accelerating towards the Earth, therefore the falling mass will have no forces acting on it.
    Space does curve, just like water going down a drain.
    A clock will run slower on Earth than at rest in free space because a clock on Earth has a velocity relative to space.
    Light's path is curved near a mass because the light is moving through a medium that is accelerating towards that mass.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Density and buoyancy are the actual terms you are looking for. You're typing out star trek levels of bs.

    • @FloydD.Barber
      @FloydD.Barber หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garnet4846 Wrong. I am typing the truth.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FloydD.Barber < just another bot spamming nonsense.

    • @FloydD.Barber
      @FloydD.Barber หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garnet4846 Wrong again.
      Your comments do not make rational sense.

    • @garnet4846
      @garnet4846 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FloydD.Barber nice try bot.