Yep, they underdelivered in MSFS. CRJ is okey, but still has flaws and is kinda abandoned right now… the TwinOtter was a joke. I will definitely wait and see before i spend money on this A330. If it doesnt fit my expectations, ill just skip it and wait for PMDG 777 for long haul
Okay, I get it. This is a flight sim and a lot of us mostly fly and we dont pay attention to the cabin a lot. But it is a very nice feature to have. Also being able to set custom wing views yourself would be amazing, but I guess we have to use the Default showcase views in the Camera menu thing. There better be some good default wing views because a LOT and a LOT of people care about that and it makes no sense why Aerosoft wouldn't make a cabin like Fenix, PMDG, and other companies.
Yep, all about setting custom views, especially on a long haul flight. But... I'm not going to complain cause the last thing I want is for them to delay it anymore. So.... i'm not sayin' no' nottin'
49:01 of course🙄 Because Mathijs and Aerosoft doesn't give a sh*t about what customers say. PMDG 737 has a cabin, Fenix A320 has one, even the freeware A220 from Synaptic Simulations will feature one! But in the eyes of Mathijs it's just useless... I don't go into the cabin in the sim to connect to some passengers, but I do it because it's awesome to be able to look out of every single window of a plane and have a dynamic sound which really pushes the immersion. (not related to the timestamp): And system wise it's gonna be the same like on every Aerosoft plane. Not detailed enough and anything that is not likely to happen in real life will not be a thing. I am tired of this rejecting attitude of Mathijs and they should finally go further than they have done so far.
Don't just say "customers" when you clearly talk about yourself. I personally do not need a cabin. I see the view from the cabin windows more than I'd like to every time I'm boarding a real plane. I don't need that on my PC, where I want to fly the airplane and not pretend to go on the next business trip. Aerosoft clearly says what they will offer and what not. Don't buy it, if your expectations are not met. Problem solved, nobody forces you to buy it. Seems you aren't the target audience anyway. There will be other add ons, that will have, what you want.
@@conaly082 that’s your opinion i want an cabin and a majority would most likely want a cabin so he indeed can say customers.And saying nobody is forcing you to buy is true but if a majority of the audience wants a cabin and the developer says he doesn’t care that’s gonna reflect on their ratings and revenue.
Interesting interview. Matthijs (pronouce Matt-Ice) is an interesting character. I'mlooking forward to the driving game, and hope fervently that it'll support VR :)
Aerosoft get flak because of a certain GA they made for MSFS but they're more than alright. Big fan of the CRJ and i have no doubt that this one will be amazing.
I think they should just listen to what the community wants. If it's clear quite a few more people would buy the A330 if it had a properly modeled cabin, I would totally do it. It's basic economics. You've got to break even.
I hope they create tiller accuses. If they keep on thinking of ideas then a tiller is one! On there new taking video I was disappointed as taxiing looks twitchy and they taxi with rudder pedals! I’m not impressed so far if they can’t get the basics down
Well get to programming, you will have a decent one in about 10 years. there is a reason developers don't make the A350 they don't have much info on it.
@@AtomAtom111 well the 350 is an incredibly complicated aircraft. It has an all glass cockpit with each screen having a multitude of uses so it would honestly take forever to create one if someone is gonna make a study level one. Same with the 787 but on a lesser level. There is a 787 for msfs but it’s extremely basic and is not very realistic at all. Digital flight dynamics is actually make an a350 for msfs but it won’t be out until late 2024 if even that and I’m not sure how realistic that will be
@@mathiskra P3d has been out for a long time so there’s been sufficient time to create a good one. Msfs has been out for almost a few years and is a completely new game so it’s gonna be a while before developers come out with the wide body aircraft that are very complex. We are already starting to see some wide body come out like the pmdg 777, fbw a380, etc.
![MSFS 2024 The MOST Advanced Flight Sim EVER (FULL) The Blu-XPerience [EP.43]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/u9vUVpettp0/mqdefault.jpg)
![MSFS 2024 The MOST Advanced Flight Sim EVER (FULL) The Blu-XPerience [EP.43]](/img/tr.png)
![What is the Future of X-Plane? (FULL) The Blu-XPerience [EP.48]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SD0P48oI-R8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Airbus A350 Lufthansa ULTIMATE COCKPIT MOVIE + Business Class Tokyo [AirClips full flight series]](/img/n.gif)
As someone who has spent thousands over the years, I've stopped purchasing Aerosoft developed software, too many disappointments in the past.
Yep, they underdelivered in MSFS. CRJ is okey, but still has flaws and is kinda abandoned right now… the TwinOtter was a joke. I will definitely wait and see before i spend money on this A330. If it doesnt fit my expectations, ill just skip it and wait for PMDG 777 for long haul
@@lupo_aim yup PMDG and FBW A380(cant complain about the end product as its free) is all im excited for.
This is the plane I’ve been waiting for!
Okay, I get it. This is a flight sim and a lot of us mostly fly and we dont pay attention to the cabin a lot. But it is a very nice feature to have. Also being able to set custom wing views yourself would be amazing, but I guess we have to use the Default showcase views in the Camera menu thing. There better be some good default wing views because a LOT and a LOT of people care about that and it makes no sense why Aerosoft wouldn't make a cabin like Fenix, PMDG, and other companies.
Yep, all about setting custom views, especially on a long haul flight.
But... I'm not going to complain cause the last thing I want is for them to delay it anymore.
So.... i'm not sayin' no' nottin'
49:01 of course🙄 Because Mathijs and Aerosoft doesn't give a sh*t about what customers say.
PMDG 737 has a cabin, Fenix A320 has one, even the freeware A220 from Synaptic Simulations will feature one! But in the eyes of Mathijs it's just useless... I don't go into the cabin in the sim to connect to some passengers, but I do it because it's awesome to be able to look out of every single window of a plane and have a dynamic sound which really pushes the immersion.
(not related to the timestamp):
And system wise it's gonna be the same like on every Aerosoft plane. Not detailed enough and anything that is not likely to happen in real life will not be a thing. I am tired of this rejecting attitude of Mathijs and they should finally go further than they have done so far.
I agree 100%
Don't just say "customers" when you clearly talk about yourself. I personally do not need a cabin. I see the view from the cabin windows more than I'd like to every time I'm boarding a real plane. I don't need that on my PC, where I want to fly the airplane and not pretend to go on the next business trip.
Aerosoft clearly says what they will offer and what not. Don't buy it, if your expectations are not met. Problem solved, nobody forces you to buy it. Seems you aren't the target audience anyway. There will be other add ons, that will have, what you want.
Tbh while it is a dick attitude i have to agree with him here, i hardly ever go into a cabin, ever.
@@conaly082 that’s your opinion i want an cabin and a majority would most likely want a cabin so he indeed can say customers.And saying nobody is forcing you to buy is true but if a majority of the audience wants a cabin and the developer says he doesn’t care that’s gonna reflect on their ratings and revenue.
we wan’t realism in the flying experience everything else is secondary
After this interview and how aerosoft talks about cabin like notting important, i decided to skip and wait for pmdg 777.
First question I would ask is why was the Otter pulled and are we should also anticipate that this could also happen to other planes like the A330.
I surprisingly enjoyed this interview
It was good man.
Interesting interview. Matthijs (pronouce Matt-Ice) is an interesting character. I'mlooking forward to the driving game, and hope fervently that it'll support VR :)
Aerosoft get flak because of a certain GA they made for MSFS but they're more than alright. Big fan of the CRJ and i have no doubt that this one will be amazing.
no their CRJ is terrible for anyone who actually cares about realism and quality
@@mlx39996 No it’s not terrible. Don’t be a smart&$$ little troll. It only goes a short way.
I think they should just listen to what the community wants. If it's clear quite a few more people would buy the A330 if it had a properly modeled cabin, I would totally do it. It's basic economics. You've got to break even.
Really looking forwards to the a330!
I hope they create tiller accuses. If they keep on thinking of ideas then a tiller is one! On there new taking video I was disappointed as taxiing looks twitchy and they taxi with rudder pedals! I’m not impressed so far if they can’t get the basics down
If it’s like the P3D version then I’m going to pass on the A330. Very disappointed in Aerosoft lately.
I wonder when it will release. I am assuming in the summer.
that what they want. they said it will be release most likely in the summer but dont know when during the summer.
@@specialopssoldier1 then outta nowhere. We’re 90% done and then they push it back till Christmas lol
@@VineFortuna yep ridiculous
Summer of what year?
@@fsx-legend4602 Summer 2023
Nothing news , finally this Aircraft release in 2030🥴🥴🥴
maybe for summer 2036 will be ready
I love te latinvfr a321 because of its cabin...adds greatly to immersion
LOL pure junk that plane flies just like the default Neo which is also junk
Ewww
A330 is boring. I want the 350 😍
Well get to programming, you will have a decent one in about 10 years. there is a reason developers don't make the A350 they don't have much info on it.
@@fsx-legend4602 yeah heard about that problem. What about the 787? Same problem?
@@AtomAtom111 well the 350 is an incredibly complicated aircraft. It has an all glass cockpit with each screen having a multitude of uses so it would honestly take forever to create one if someone is gonna make a study level one. Same with the 787 but on a lesser level. There is a 787 for msfs but it’s extremely basic and is not very realistic at all. Digital flight dynamics is actually make an a350 for msfs but it won’t be out until late 2024 if even that and I’m not sure how realistic that will be
@@sean1388 what about the qualitywings 787? I‘ve never flown it in P3D/FSX but people said it’s at least on the same level as PMDG
@@mathiskra P3d has been out for a long time so there’s been sufficient time to create a good one. Msfs has been out for almost a few years and is a completely new game so it’s gonna be a while before developers come out with the wide body aircraft that are very complex. We are already starting to see some wide body come out like the pmdg 777, fbw a380, etc.
I respect his work, but his english makes me cringe so hard. "Dat is somsing de sim kan not doe at dis moment". I hate dutch accent in English.
That’s rude