Farid great response ex shia here. and i was deep into it my whole life, i can say that ammar has changed. alot. in 2011 and before he used to hate speakers like yasser habib who used to do these types of videos cause of shia sunni unity and causing the killing of shias in the middle east due to there cursing of respected personalities. he was opposed of shia lecturers using the mimbar to curse or defame these figures for it has no positive bearing. until he got sponsored he always was afollower of sistani. but that changed when he got sponsored by hussein tv a shirazi tv show now why is that important. ayatollah shirazi is the teacher of yasser habib. and is one of the few ayatollahs who opposes unity with sunnis. and openly courages cursing tatbir. and other things made haram by sistani and khamenei to name two prominoate ayatollahs or marjas who oppose shirazi arrested his brother in qom. ever since he got money his message changed he began being more distasteful it first began with his ISIS refrence to the first caliph abu bark (ra) and every year since he gotten more bold. ayatollah khamenei made a fatwa against these scholars. and sais they were m15 m16 agents or british shia he called them only useful to cause hatred between sunni and shia for the UK and its allies like america and israel. hamdulilah i left shiasm many years ago. but still hold respect for khamenei for giving fatwas against cursing against tatbir. and urging sunni shia unity. unlike shirazi who now owns ammar nakshawani. anyways bit of insight good video
@@abiabi9353 If Allah describes them in the Quran as mothers of the believers, and this did not happen to the wives of the prophets Noah and lot , peace be upon them, Who are you or someone else to come and attack the mothers of the believers?
@babahadjimohamed9339 Mother of believers is a legal title, meaning that it is impermissible for any of the wives of the Prophet ﷺ to get remarried after his passing. (Since it is haram to marry your mother). The term has nothing to do with merit. The Prophet had both good and bad wives. And the bad wives were a test for him from Allah ﷽.
@@Adam-iz5kh legal title ? Said who exactly ? Why were the wives of the prophets Noah and Lot, peace be upon them, not described in Quran as mothers of the believers? If the intention was to prohibit marriage to the wives of the Prophet, peace be upon him only, why did the prohibition not come without a title of honor for them, which is mothers of the believers?
Truly the people of my house (Ahl al-Bayt) in my community is like Noah's ark: Whoever takes refuge therein is saved and whoever opposes it is drowned."
@@jessep517 Minor variations of this hadith appear in the works of Sunni scholars such as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Abd-Allah al-Tabari, al-Suyuti, and al-Shablanji.
its not a conspericy...lol...ammar may not speak very calmly, but this is not conpericy brother are you blind? Its in the QURAN, IN SAHIH, IN BUKHARI....
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 the Quran also didn’t give authority to Abu bakr. It also didn’t give Umar the authority to creat “good bidah” passed the prophet Mohammad’s death. The Quran does not verify many things. We are talking about history and comparing 3rd party sourcing though Hadith. The Quran is a backing to the claims. Lut and Nuh peace be upon them didn’t need to divorce their wives for Allah to tell us in the Quran they are going to hell. If you’re looking for all the proofs of 3rd party sourcing in the Quran. And they were all there. There wouldn’t be Shia. Sunni. Selifi. Wahabi. Ahmadi and many more splits within the religion. There wouldn’t be different school of thoughts in Sunni Islam as well as Shia Islam. If it was all “clear”. Just because Sayid Ammar has an outlook and view on the sourcing you may not have does not make him wrong. He’s been studying for 20+ years traveling the world and studying. We should respect those who dedicate their lives to studying these sources. Shia Sunni or whoever. Their analysis counts. And so does yours. If this was supposed to be easy, we would all have 1 simple narrative. Love you brother I appreciate the points. And for all of us as Muslims. We should look into each point for ourselves. Open the sourcing ourself. And read! As Allah has commanded us to. Salam Habibi 🤲🏼✊🏽♥️
dude trynna doing tafsir with english translation LOOL, you know he is a con-artist. because they dont have any tafsir + all their books are not authentic. so they built everything upon lies.
I am sunni, but to be honest I found your rebuttal to be weak. You are just beating around the bush. please come up rebuttal of every hadees Ammar quoted with reference, page number and book and the publisher. I have double checked everything ammar has said. I am eager to hear you reply. Please help me, I am feeling uneasy about what I have been thought my entire life
Brother we shais are not all the same, as a shia myself I don't agree with Ammar on everything but his last vid on Hafsa/Ayesha had a very strong argument. Brother read About Ghadir khum, and what happened in saqeefa
You see how Ammar twisted the word 'happly', I found him dishonesty on this, he mocked Allah subhana hu wa taala directly really ... What else he was on his bad intentions? BTW Is tattoo allowed in shiaism?
I am sunni and i found his rebuttal more than sufficient barak allahu feehu. He showed multiple instances of lies and misattributions by ammar. If you had a specific thing maybe mention it and we can try to help inschallah. But if all things of ammar you still find convincing... Even this interpretation of the hadith about fitnah from the east coming from aisha's home ..idk man. No words I can say in ramadan
Completely agree with you, this was a weak rebuttal. His responses through out this was based of opinion not whats written. Sated Ammar is pointing out exactly what's written. That to in Sunni literature only. And through the Quran. And what we got back was no he's misunderstood it when it's written clearly.
I mean basically all you tried to accomplish in this video was trying to downplay his words but you didn’t actually refute anything he said with solid evidence and it took you this long to make a response to one of his topics what about the other videos 😂
You need to do this reaction academically(give reference from sunni book) If not, your comment only based on your opinion, emotion and it is weak argument. Salam Ramadan, brother!
I don't understand. He showed him to be dishonest with his usages of sources . Do you need a hadith saying that ammar says a book is from abdulwahab when it's not lol?
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
@@sadikkadom9566 Yes, he uses them DISHONESTLY. Make your judgement. One who points out mistakes honestly, or one who dishonestly uses Sahih books (but not sahih hadith lmao) and Qur'an.
I am not satisfied with this response. Ammar Nakshawani came with strong evidence from our books. I hope you can clarify. It has created a lot of doubts.
@@iceycones654 1. I have seen these types of comments a lot recently and farid exposed a similar comment in one of his video 2. Because of this concept of taqiyya shias can't be trusted. Look at that comment,this peter guy is definitely a shia lol .
@@Check_my_playlists What do you mean by exposed? And generalizing a whole group of people because of a concept? Do you even know what Taqqiya means? It means to hide your identity in fear of death or execution, this peter guy doesn't seem to be in any danger. Also this is what the Quran says about this, "Surah 3:28, “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.”
So while he used your books and quoted direct sources you just engaged in ad hominem attacks on him and twisting words instead of actually refuting any of what he said? Sounds about right
Such a weak response - classic Sunni response when the truth is clear even within your own books.. ‘oh they’re plotting because they loved the prophet’ ‘they would make the prophet upset because they were joking’ ‘the chain of narration is weak’. If only you defended the real Prophet like you defend your idols. It is a known fact and even among Sunni academics this is known to be a verse about these two wives (Hafsa and Aisha). God just decides to reveal a verse to defend the prophet and threaten these two if they continue to mock the Prophet out of bants? God doesn’t know that they were jealous because they ‘loved’ him? Wake up ya Akhi. Why do you make these people infallible and always find an excuse?
Notice how they always use their annoying tone to get their point across. Ironically every ashura they smack themselves anyway, so they’re losing brain cells by the year. That’s why their arguments get weaker overtime lol
@Azharq2023 annoying voice? So he's voice is more important than his message? Remember mocking people was one of the attributes of kafir during the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) so this makes me think you guys are just focusing on being funny then learning the truth.
Man after seeing him share a clip of Omar suleiman describing Aishah and how rosy and sugar coated it is - as if there are no issues at all, I’d rather face the truth from Ammar than be blinded by Sunni scholars.
Thank u Syed ammar your truths have rattled so many cages n the true colours of those who still refuse or deny even their own books by twisting and turning it as they twist n turn the words of Allah swt to fit their agendas!
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Are you saying it's alright for a wife to lie and say her husband mouth smells just for fun? What's your defense? We learn Rasullah never lied even in jokes. And how is Aisha even 16 in medina?
He is saying ammar is an inconsistent liar slandering the wives of the prophet salallahu aleihi wa salam who stayed married to him till his death in the holy month of ramadan in public . Hope this helps your understanding .
No one is infalliable except the prophet pbuh everyone has a qareen with them which is shytan that tempts them expect the prophet pbuh also keep in mind I think Aisha and had sa ra repented afterwards that innixdent
17:50 the reason “it’s a test” is valid for the question of why prophet Muhammad stayed married, is because Aisha is one of, if not THE central figure in the Sunni/Shia schism It’s a test for every Muslim after him - when faced with a question like Jamal, whose side are you on? I notice some sneaky language you used at the beginning… aisha was merely “involved” with Jamal… Why dance around it? The weight of what she did, compared against all the Hadiths we have about Ali’s status? Don’t whitewash the battle of Jamal, while being ready to criticize others for their creative uses of language. Did her father Abu Bakr not kill those who went against his Khilaafa? So by keeping Aisha around, this becomes the ultimate test for every Muslim to pick a side. You simply cannot be intellectually honest and remain neutral Once you start putting the Hadiths in favor of Ahlulbayt, and comparing the actions of some sahabis against those Hadiths, then you can see that early Islamic figures were not exactly the most pure of people So then the question becomes, who do you take your religion from? If Omar/Aisha/Abu Bakr are not good enough, then WHO IS? Enter the pure household of Allah’s messenger, which solves all the moral problems a new studying Muslim would have… both through prophetic wisdom passed down and purity of character guaranteed by Allah
Your response to Syed Ammar is not strong at all if you watch any of his videos he uses Sunni books and gives the book name published hadeeth number and author and volume and makes his case from Sunni books and Quran to outline the Shia view of Aisha and Hafsa all you did was reiterate what he basically said and just give your own opinions but didn’t give hard concrete sources that lead to a solid believable conclusion
Shia ..worship graves and 12 semi-deity imams, believe in distorting the Qur’an, declare 120,000 companions to be infidels, and attack the honor of the Mothers of the Believers 🤦♂️🤣
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
You claim that these people are the righteous of believers and second to the Prophet (saw), all Sayed Ammar is doing is showing you from your OWN literature and Sahih texts that this CLEARLY is utter nonsense. To say these people are human and they made mistakes and so on so on but you keep them as your TOP guide to the Sunnah of the Prophet is delusional, it is simple, we Shia do not want them, we do not need them, Allah, his messenger, Quran and his Ahlulbayt are “sufficient”for us. if you truly follow Umar’s teachings then you should remove all Hadith literature from your houses and studying as Umar said to the prophet of GOD in Sahih al Bukhari, “The Quran is sufficient for us”, we do not need to get you a pen and paper! May Allah guide us All.
Lmao. Clearly the points you're making in this video are absurd, taking parts of the ayah and saying that Allah is praising them. How blind could you guys be wallah? That's the problems us shias/rawafidh/kuffar/murtad (whatever you wanna call us, it's quite expected from you guys now) have with you, maybe not with the certain personalities in fact. You praise them to such an extent that they clearly don't deserve. It's clear as day. When you say Aisha was the most beloved, best wife bla bla all nonsense, that for us is the biggest disrespect to Sayyeda Khadija (AS). And we praise the ahlul bayt (AS) because they for sure well deserve that praise, plus we have clear evidence from your literature with nothing that can disregard their status.
@@AH_5878 what kind of stupid comparative question this is? Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was the wife of Rasul Allah while imam Ali (AS) was his successor. Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was his most beloved among the wives and imam Ali (AS) was his most beloved among the companions.
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 haha yes. Also, I'm trying to find the word 'happly' in the dictionary. Couldn't find in the one we have on the internet, lemme know if someone is a Shakespeare fan or smth, maybe it is a word.
May Allah help u Sunnis. With u guys the verse “it’s not the eyes that’s are blind, it’s the heart” is well and true. Syed Ammar using ur books to prove u wrong and u still can’t accept the truth
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm crazy conclusions? 😂😂 he read the facts from ur books and told u what they said? He didn’t conclude these things… ur scholars did. This farid brother is trying his best to escape the truth by looking for silly ways out
Nice try fooling the ummah without showing proofs, so that they dont go read the Quran and their own books. All of the ahlulbayt were given the merit of shahadat, including the Holy Prophet pbuh. And the ones to kill Him pbuh were his own wives. May Allah never forgive them
@@condorianonegdiffsgokuthe reality is Quran cannot be understood with our Hadith. If you read the tafsir of the Ayat ul tathir it is clear who the members of the Ahlulbayt are, and the prophet makes it clear in the Hadith that it is not his wife/ wives.
@@May-mp9vw The verses of Quran are not random sentences stiched together. They have coherency, order and a story. And it is very clear if you read the verses serially, the wives (ra) are part of ahlul bayt. The hadiths have a weaker strength than what is clear in the Quran. And our sunni hadiths don't even exclude the wives. And I don't read shia tafsirs. Sunni tafsirs say this verse refers to the wives (ra). Based on context the term ahlul bayt might be used for the wives or it might be used for the family of Ali (ra) or for both. In this verse, however, it is primarily directed to the wives and it indirectly may include other members as an addition. If 11:73 includes sarah (as), there is no reason to doubt the verse of ahlul bayt includes the wives of prophet (saws). It's very similar in structure.
20:48 And that's one of the problems with the Shia, they are fine with the prophet warning people about Aisha then continue his marriage with her. And when you asked a Shia would you continue your marriage to your wife if your wife gone against Ali!!? Or if she is a Kaffir, or if she is a Zaniah? And they always refuse or divorce their wives, but they are fine with the prophet being that. It is the hate they have been growing with that blinded them with such obvious facts.
First of all the prophet isn't your regular human being, he is the best of the creations of Allah (SWT) and about prophets staying with their kafir wives the Quran has given an example in the same surah 66, where Allah (SWT) talks about the wives of prophet Nuh(As) and Lot(As).
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them) First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them) First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut stayed with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
Allah literally told Aisha to fix up coz she betrayed him 😂😂. Allah said he can divorce her and he would be happy even though Allah says he does not like divorce.
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed.. It fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Bro, you are not saying the truth. Please study more and carefully, so that you can see the truth with your naked eyes Habibi. Mahe Ramadhan Kareem to you and your loved ones. May ALLAH grants you hidayah through the blessings of this Holy Month.
Alhmdulil Allah for shia and followers of ahlul bayte when even the sunnies can not find fault in tbem yet but we find many contradiction in Aisha and the first 3 khalifa of sunnies.
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm we make it? when its even in your OWN books? you guys you guys are blind lol now it makes sense that when Allah says in Quran that "its not the eyes that are blind but the hearts". we will see in hereafter in sha Allah
@@asefhosseini3074 yeah count me out from venerating people so highly to worship them and to make claims of infallibility and divinity to certain individuals who were somehow oppressed at the same time. You guys are in a cult and the sooner you realize the better. May Allah guide you all.
Seriously? Really? Who’s got a HUUUGE number of hate books against the other? Who’s whole sect is based upon the hate of the other? Who’s sect has got some dumb ass stories or bidas about the other? Think u need to reevaluated ur life if that’s what u think
We’re not the ones chopping Sunnis heads. Destroying their civilizations. And funding terrorism. The Shia are the only ones helping the Sunni Palestinians right now. While the 1.9billion Sunni watch and pray from home. We are focused on you you’re right. Focused on protecting you and sharing the truth.
Speaker’s Corner bashes Shia every other week. What are you smoking And yeah it’s kinda hard to NOT focus on the Bakri sect when all sectarian militias in the Middle East & South Asia come from them lol Y’all need to start acting human
And you failed to actually falsify his claims. Watch his full lecture. Aisha got exposed, cry about it. Because I’m pretty sure Allah and his prophet love a person so much they’d threaten them by saying god is on his side and so is Gabriel and the believers and the angels. It’s not a cop out to say she was a test. Aisha was a test. Everything in this life is a test, Ammar bin yaser said himself, verily Allah has tested you with Aisha to see if you choose him or her. Your arguments are based on emotion rather than intellectual enquiry grow up Literally you’ll happily say Aisha being a test is a cop out because it emotionally gets to you but you’ll happily say the children in Gaza are dying because they’re being tested. Why is one a cop out and one isn’t? A test has a purpose, ie to choose Allah or her. Because whether you like it or not, Aisha has demonstrated many evidences or herself being against Allah. And literally refuted your own claim, you said at the beginning, if you have a opinion on a personality like hitler, giving charity this will be seen as bad. You’ve literally done the same thing. You’ve assumed Aisha is a good person so any Hadith narrated from her must be from a good place like kisa, why have you assumed that? That’s based on emotion. Again the shia just show that there is a lot of evidence to show that Aisha is shady person and thus we must dissociate from her
Brother @Farid, Syed Ammar made it clear that during his series #4 and #5, he will show evidence that the Quran and Sunni books expose Aisha and Hafsa. In your final comment you make the claim, 19:19 "To summarize, Allah (swt) never exposed Aisha and the Prophet (pbuh) never exposed Aisha despite what Ammar wants to believe." Can you make a video responding to each of the verses in the Quran and Hadiths from Sunni books that Syed Ammar used as evidence from his series #4 and #5 where Allah (swt) and the Prophet (pbuhaf) exposed Aisha. This should address your points 1, 2 and 3 you raise at the end of your video.
I'm super glad I watched this. Nakshawani very effectively why the Shia narrative makes sense...and the Sunni narrative does not. I do respect Farid, though, and hope he and his followers come to the truth.
I think if you pointed out how Allah had regard the people who spread rumors about Aisha’s supposed “infidelity” *Astagfirullah* and how they were condemned it would make this video stronger by making it clear that they are committing the same action that had those people condemned.
Rafida focus on criticizing the wives and ashaab of prophet Muhammad A.S. Make the jealousy out of love turn out to be enmity. May Allah guide them or curse them.
2:43 such people are clowns Aisha and hafsa (may allah be pleased with them both)are wives of the prophet Good womens are for good mens Bad womens are for bad womens If prophet Muhammad(pbuh) is the best Then his wives are also the best
This video is a clear example that you are Ahlul Sunnah is focusing on the Rafidha. If they weren't, this video wouldn't even exist. Especially because it is a direct response to Ammar.
It’s not just an insult to the mothers of the believers radhi allahu anyu but an insult against the prophet sallahu alayhi wasalam! How can you call yourself a follower of his and insult his wives and imply that he isn’t a good enough judge of character to know who he’s marrying?
Weak response to be honest. I’ve seen quite a few response videos to Ammar‘s lectures this Ramadan, already, and none of them actually give a substantial counter-argument. The responses are either a mockery, or using other Shia scholars opinions or like in this video, picking out small things and not even giving a response that actually considers the argument of Aisha, for example, being in the wrong. A bunch of dodging around. Also if you claim some Hadiths from Bukhari are weak, then please do me a favour and stop claiming it to be Sahih and 100% authentic.
Great rebuttal. We shouldn't even be debating any of this when the Quran clearly says the wives of the Prophet are the mothers of the believers. How can the mothers of the believers be disbelievers
What caused Aisha RA to fight imam Ali in Jamal... clearly shows even if you are related to prophet doesn't mean you are always on right path. May allah be pleased with her she had done damage to the islam too
When you love aisha more than prophet (Sawa), this is why god keeps you in darkness and turn you blind, I pray to allah to guide my all sunni brothers and sisters to the reality and help them to accept the truth
19:14 - no, this doesn’t sound like an evil Nasibi. As a strict Shia, it’s inappropriate to say Aisha is purely evil. Outside of prophets and the Ahlulbayt, everyone is shades of gray. Vast vast majority of Shia scholars condemn Aisha’s actions but we are not Allah to say whether she’s in heaven or hell. However, Islam is not a joke, not a game, and not something to be taken from people who have both purity and impurity. Aisha is not a purely bad character, but her actions, both against Ali, jealousy of Khadijah, doubting the prophethood of Muhammad (SAWA) disqualify her from being a source of authority when you DO have alternatives. If no alternatives, then Aisha would just be a mufti or sheika. But when the question is Ali or Aisha, there should be zero hesitation And if you are to say: well we love both Does you really love your father if you don’t obey him? Do you love Allah if you never obey him? So if we say we love Ahlulbayt, then obedience is mandatory. الثقلين وآية المودّة Now we have to see what these so called Ahlulbayt actually said, who their enemies were, what they taught, how they lived If you do the above, then you’re Shiat Ahlulbayt and Allahuma barik lak
As a Sunni, that’s exactly what I say, Allah will judge, he is the only judge. Who are we to decide when we weren’t even born and did not see over them. Hope we have Sunni Shia unity, what you said is a good example of how we can come to common terms and let go of the grey areas! And focus on the most important things in religion
Its actually sickening to see people curse, say bad about the mothers of the believers (may Allah be pleased with them)when Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala has forgiven them and is pleased with them. End of story.
Good video, but if the story of the Prophet pbuh and Maria is not true, what about Sunan an Nasai 3959? It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. (Authentic according to darussalam)
Bro, he is literally reading Quran and the commentary. When are you going to even listen to him? When are you going to actually read Quran and the commentary yourselves? This isn't rocket science. Put your sectarianism aside and open your eyes. Read Quran. Ask yourself, how were Ahlulbayt (a.s.) were respected and treated in the history? Keep it that simple and start from there.
Rafida are like St.paul. He tampered the risala of Isa (Al), while rafida also tries to undermine the risala of rasululah by tampering the quran, where it says she is a pure women and is a mother of the believers.
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
All you're doing is defending the people you "worship" without any real talk. I am a sunni, and I find your arguments baseless. This nakshwani guy is to the point, explaining what is in the Quran and sahih books. It's right there, there is no two ways about it. And people saying "mother of the believers" like she was the only wife/ves of the Prophet. The title "mother of the believers" was given because they could not re marry after the prophet passed on. Ammars lectures are an eye opener, and you better accept the fact that ahle sunna hides these things not wanting people to know about the filth that happened with the prophet. There's no explanation. Shame on you
Brother, you are playing with words and not negating what Sayed Ammar was saying. You are down playing the actions or softening. Mashallah, you have many books behind you, and would of been better for you for showed us forgiveness from the wives of the Holy Prophet (saws) that was they have done was wrong. Or at the very least show another sahih hadith negating one of the Sayed Ammar's sahih hadith (under discussion) that he was wrong. But it is ok, because we will all go back to our Lord and we will be judged on our conclusions. P.S It's really unfortunate that some people that comment here are saying the Shias are not Muslim. Most Sunni scholars, whilst disagreeing obviously with the Shi’a on matters of difference, have accepted them within the Muslim community and do not consider them as following another religion.
12:34 The book “رسالة في الرد على الرافضة” has been attributed to multiple authors in various sources: Muhammad Hayyat ibn Ibrahim al-Sindhi1, an Islamic scholar known for his contributions to the Hanafi and Hanbali schools of thought. Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the founder of Wahhabism, whose works include a book with a similar title Muhammad bin Khalil bin Yusuf Abu Hamid al-Balbisi al-Shafi’i, also known as Al-Ramli Al-Maqdisi, who has a book with the same title.
Bummer I was trying not to be sectarian or get into polemics at all this Ramadan,… cuz of you know Gaza,.. But I have been in the Sunni mosque all month so far,. Except one day,. And praying like you, I see you as brothers ,. But I also hear a lot of snide comments from ignorance,. (Not towards me but in general/ probably cuz they watch these dawah bro channels) this is why,. We practice taqiyya,. I haven’t subverted or even preached one word ,. Of Shia thought ,. Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) would be proud 😊 Anyways it sucks your books that are sahih are not sahih as soon as our argument appears,… as sahih,. Get over it Gaza is starving 😢
@@rcmysm9123 where's the comparison your making your own comparison again it was again refering to the disbeliefing wives of prophet not the other thing apart
@@Syy-q5h The Quran says he sought their pleasure. So he didn't actually make halal haram in the true sense but rather decided that their pleasure is a must so he needs to refrain. Why did he seek their pleasure?
Allah exposed them When he revealed the verse and then the prophet Recite it, you think people didn't ask people didn't have an inclination to who he Was referring to A roamer mill went around and everybody knew to whom the verse was Referring to And as for The prophet peace be upon literary pointed at her house. And you deny when the truth is literally in your face, you put blinders on.
These shia preachers are truly making their place in Jahannam deeper and deeper with these statements of individuals Allah (God) stated clearly in the Quran he is PLEASED WITH. May (God) Guide them before the inevitable reality of death Radiallahu-anhum
If the truth makes me to be in hellfire then let it be. I don't have problem with that because I know the truth and Allah will reveal it with Mahdi (PBUH).
Your response is weak and emotive. You provide no evidence. If my brothers and sisters listened to Nakshawani they would too have question marks about what Muslims have been taught since they were small. I’m very intrigued Ammar Nakshawani’s lectures and they are impressive with history evidence using solid literature. My mind has been opened.
@@everythingandroidois Only in the sense that we can’t marry them. This “mothers” verse you quote was Allah’s response to Talha’s proclamation he wanted to marry Aisha, and he was a so-called “righteous Sahabi” at the same time You cannot have it both ways, we either have logic or we have this blind Nasibi idolization
Hazrat Lots wife was disobedient, divorce her. Hazrat Nuhs son was disobedient, disown him. Even if its not "happly" as in pleasure, ALLAH is looking at POSSIBILITIES for divorce...
...but didn't. Allah says he will do many things to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) if he does such and such, this does not mean it will ever happen.
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 daleel like yours. FYI both the wives were destroyed like other people in front of the Prophets. But u have given your allegiance to majoosis and yahoodis (remember your forefather, ibn sahab the prime enemy of Islam)
Am i the only one who felt like this was a clear rebuttal and the evidence of the weakness in the chain of the hadith that the Brother Ammar accepts basically disintegrates all his points? As well as Ammar taking these english footnotes and treating them like real evidence? Alhamdullilah, thank you Farid for your excellent analysis as always and may Allah make clear the haqq from the batil
Jazakallah khair brother Farid. You have splendidly and concisely explained the background. That is enough for seekers of truth. And those whose heart has disease will not understand. When sahaba asked the Prophet pbuh, "who do you love the most," he replied "Ayesha" and they asked amongst men, he replied "her father." This is enough for us to believe. May Allah Ta'ala bless the souls of all the mothers of believers. Aameen
May Allah be pleased with all the wives of the Prophet pbuh. I'll be honest I genuinely find it kind of funny and endearing that Aisha ra and Hafsa ra clearly had a BFF relationship going on lol. How many hadith do we have where they are both involved 😂 it's nice to see they were actually normal people and they were pretty young as well and clearly still a bit immature and acting like it. Alhumdulillah that Allah never exposes our own immaturity when we were young, how many of us have done silly things as teenagers lol
salaams brother. I came across a Shia on social media who pointed out a few hadith in Abd al-Razzaq's Musannaf asserting that Ibn Umar (RA) held the view that taraweeh/Qiyam should not be prayed in the masjid. could you perhaps make a video on this?
Sayyed ammar made a whole video about the taraweeh prayer and all of the sources are from sunni books, I recommend you go watch it and inshallah Allah swt will open your eyes to the truth
@@bubblegumniece8952 He has a bad habit of using inauthentic hadith to make points against the sahaba, whilst presenting them as if they are sahih. otherwise he misrepresents/misinterprets the sahih ones. That alone makes him untrustworthy, and I dont think it is wise as a layman to take knowledge from such a person.
@@Shobob okay how about this, you go to Sayed Ammar's video about the taraweeh prayers, get your own copy of sahih Al-bukhari and other Hadiths mentioned and open the Hadith to which he opens to. I can see your sincere heart is willing to go on the right path. all this propaganda you heard about Sayed Ammar are pure hate speeches so don't listen to others and see for yourself
@@Shobob Hey, i have personally viewed some of the videos regarding these controversial topics, and i must say, not out of bias, hate nor lie; that most, if not ALL of the evidence used are compiled from the 6 'believed' sahihs; through this, Amaar Nakshawani clealy shows the authenticity of the book, and reads the wording of the 'sahih' hadith/s word for word. Im sure that its not too hard for you to make your own judgment through the use of pure logic and clearly shown evident sources. So, please go and watch the entirety of the video, and i can assure you that you will be further educated regarding this topic. Hope this clarifies a few things.
Please continue to rebuke all these videos. I have been watching them from day one because he pulls out every source and reads from them directly. I am unsure of attending taraweeh in jamah after watching his video because it Is clear from the hadiths that the prophet (PBUH) advised to do them individually in the homes. If you can make a video on that it would be helpful to clarify my confusion.
Follow the Sunnah of our holy Prophet brother, not the Sunnah of Umar You don’t have to go full Shi’a yet and commemorate the martyrdom of Husayn (AS) at the hands of Yazid etc., but at least both of our sects can agree on the clear instructions to avoid all innovations correct? And Allah only judges intentions, as long as we try our best to practice the truth he is the most Merciful
What are you saying? It's not like Muslims are supposed to hunt down rafidhis for being rafidhis. Most people do other stuff. Also, Sufis, for all their flaws, do rebuke Shias for speaking negatively about the Prophet SAWW wives when confronting them.
Prove from the books just like Syed Amaar does i think it would give us a better understanding. Additionally, could i understand which Sunni Book or books specifically would be consider authentic and/or which can be considered 100% authentic?
Theres literally no word in the dictionary as happly...its a typo and the word is supposed to be happily. Do not misguide people by making new definitions
Haply is a word in dictionary and word used in arabic is عَسَىٰ which means perhaps/Maybe. Idk which Kinda Dictionary and Quran you are using and only one who is misguiding people is you at the moment.
No offence that Br. Ammar sounds like a quack, even the way he says “Sallallahu Alaihi Wa alai"eats words" annoys me. If he cant even respect and send peace and blessing to our prophet properly, anything that he says is least credible to my ears.
@@Adam-iz5kh might be nothing for some, but my personal psychological reactance to avoid such people, the marvelous Quran person also used to say "Salaam un alaikum" it might be right, but it sounded disingenuous to me, then he went and made up new weird esoteric translation of Quran, so I avoid listening to him too. It is just these small quirks of some people whom after listening for a while, I get this feeling that they are misleading me.
@iznij3284 Sallallahu alaihi w alai has a different meaning than sallallahu walaihi wasalam. It means may peace and blessing be upon him ﷺ and his family, as opposed to just him.
@@sadikkadom9566 the judgment is already in the Quran lmao Shi’ites cannot prove imamah/wilayah from the Kitab of Allah 😂 Shi’ites love to read Sahih collections of Hadith, what are you hiding in your own books? Why don’t we open up Al Kafi and see what’s in there, hmm?
Hazrat Aisha mother of believers died in 678 at age 67. Check for yourselves. Therefore born in 611. And married in 623. Therefore her marriage consummation happened at the age of ..... Calculate by yourselves
I wonder too, and it just happens to be about the same people who’s fathers stole saqifa, appointed Muwaia the governor of sham, started the war of Jamal etc…. Why is it it’s always the same characters????
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
The end of sunni deception is on the horizon. You have never rebuttled any shia narrative sufficiently..May Allah guide you non shia to the truth of the family of the rasul. (S.a.a. w.a..w.s)
If you are talking about how important al zahra was from Aisha’s own words then why do you sunnis call Aisha the one that you admit done so much bad as the mother of the believers but I hav never heard any of you call Fatima al zahra the mother of the believers. Why because she is the prophets daughter and not abu bakrs daughter? You say we worship the ahlulbayt more like you worship the sahaba and will never accept the wrong that they did! But on the day of judgement you can’t act blind when Allah swt exposes your arrogant blind heart
Aisha went to war with Ali enough said all of this back and forth is a total waste of time. Whos side are you on? Its clear you all have to go against Aisha or you going against the Caliph Ali? This for me is a huge red flag in Sunni Islam. I 100% would be going to war against Aisha but will you be making the same decision your stuck between a roch and a hard place.
Imagine if I am someone who has no clue, and imagine if I am Shia. Why wouldn't I believe in what Syed is saying? I will be listening to him daily, and take everything he says as truth. Imagine how much wrong info I am being fed and how much things are manipulated enough to deceive people like "me" to develop hatred against pious wives and companions of Prophet Muhammed PBUH. And yes the hatred for Mohammed Bin AbdulWahab (Rahima Ullah), an attempt to discredit all his efforts (which indeed they cannot). They can just try. El7mdulillah, that brother Farid exists who takes out time to research & study and then expose these deceivers. May Allah reward you!
Farid great response ex shia here. and i was deep into it my whole life, i can say that ammar has changed. alot. in 2011 and before he used to hate speakers like yasser habib who used to do these types of videos cause of shia sunni unity and causing the killing of shias in the middle east due to there cursing of respected personalities. he was opposed of shia lecturers using the mimbar to curse or defame these figures for it has no positive bearing. until he got sponsored he always was afollower of sistani. but that changed when he got sponsored by hussein tv a shirazi tv show now why is that important. ayatollah shirazi is the teacher of yasser habib. and is one of the few ayatollahs who opposes unity with sunnis. and openly courages cursing tatbir. and other things made haram by sistani and khamenei to name two prominoate ayatollahs or marjas who oppose shirazi arrested his brother in qom. ever since he got money his message changed he began being more distasteful it first began with his ISIS refrence to the first caliph abu bark (ra) and every year since he gotten more bold. ayatollah khamenei made a fatwa against these scholars. and sais they were m15 m16 agents or british shia he called them only useful to cause hatred between sunni and shia for the UK and its allies like america and israel. hamdulilah i left shiasm many years ago. but still hold respect for khamenei for giving fatwas against cursing against tatbir. and urging sunni shia unity. unlike shirazi who now owns ammar nakshawani. anyways bit of insight good video
May Allah be pleased with the mothers of believers
Yes they are mothers of believers but their hearts are deviated just like the wives of prophets Nuhu and Lut.
@@abiabi9353 If Allah describes them in the Quran as mothers of the believers, and this did not happen to the wives of the prophets Noah and lot , peace be upon them, Who are you or someone else to come and attack the mothers of the believers?
@@abiabi9353bro these are your mothers your talking about do you think their blood is halal?
@babahadjimohamed9339 Mother of believers is a legal title, meaning that it is impermissible for any of the wives of the Prophet ﷺ to get remarried after his passing. (Since it is haram to marry your mother). The term has nothing to do with merit. The Prophet had both good and bad wives. And the bad wives were a test for him from Allah ﷽.
@@Adam-iz5kh legal title ? Said who exactly ? Why were the wives of the prophets Noah and Lot, peace be upon them, not described in Quran as mothers of the believers? If the intention was to prohibit marriage to the wives of the Prophet, peace be upon him only, why did the prohibition not come without a title of honor for them, which is mothers of the believers?
"Rafidha are the donkeys of Jews"
Minhaj al-Sunnah by Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, vol 1, page 21.
Truly the people of my house (Ahl al-Bayt) in my community is like Noah's ark: Whoever takes refuge therein is saved and whoever opposes it is drowned."
@@Adam-iz5kh Majoosi Hadith attributed to the prophet ﷺ
@@jessep517 Minor variations of this hadith appear in the works of Sunni scholars such as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Abd-Allah al-Tabari, al-Suyuti, and al-Shablanji.
@@Adam-iz5kh Check Da’if al-Jamī’ al-Sāghīr by al-Albāni, Hadith 1974.
Current situation in Gazza shows who are the donkeys of jews.
Ahmak.
May Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى reward you immensely for defending the Prophet ﷺ’s honor, and the mother of the believers رضي الله عنهم
May Allah bless the Prophet ﷺ and his pure beloved progeny.
Ameen
I think ( رضي الله عنهنَّ ) will be more accurate as mothers of the believers are woman
امين it is incumbent upon us to speak up against these batil munafiqs ❌ thank you Br Farid بارك الله فيك
Clearly can’t handle the facts they wasn’t part of 33.33 only a fool can’t see it
its not a conspericy...lol...ammar may not speak very calmly, but this is not conpericy brother are you blind? Its in the QURAN, IN SAHIH, IN BUKHARI....
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 the Quran also didn’t give authority to Abu bakr. It also didn’t give Umar the authority to creat “good bidah” passed the prophet Mohammad’s death. The Quran does not verify many things. We are talking about history and comparing 3rd party sourcing though Hadith. The Quran is a backing to the claims.
Lut and Nuh peace be upon them didn’t need to divorce their wives for Allah to tell us in the Quran they are going to hell.
If you’re looking for all the proofs of 3rd party sourcing in the Quran. And they were all there. There wouldn’t be Shia. Sunni. Selifi. Wahabi. Ahmadi and many more splits within the religion. There wouldn’t be different school of thoughts in Sunni Islam as well as Shia Islam. If it was all “clear”.
Just because Sayid Ammar has an outlook and view on the sourcing you may not have does not make him wrong. He’s been studying for 20+ years traveling the world and studying.
We should respect those who dedicate their lives to studying these sources. Shia Sunni or whoever. Their analysis counts. And so does yours.
If this was supposed to be easy, we would all have 1 simple narrative.
Love you brother I appreciate the points. And for all of us as Muslims. We should look into each point for ourselves. Open the sourcing ourself. And read! As Allah has commanded us to.
Salam Habibi 🤲🏼✊🏽♥️
1.Are you dumb????????????? NUH AND LUT DIVORCED THEIR WIVES WTFFFFF 2. Bro he used Bukhari and Muslim are you blind or what?@@abdelqadir5227
@@abdelqadir5227 why are you pretending to be a muslim?
@@abdelqadir5227very weak response .
The "happly" part was the funniest part of the video. Change my mind.
Ibn kuthair.
@@Bulayla1426Yeah that one too 😂
its "haply" actually which means perhaps, not happily, which he misread 'happly' as... he should read more old books.
dude trynna doing tafsir with english translation LOOL, you know he is a con-artist. because they dont have any tafsir + all their books are not authentic. so they built everything upon lies.
@@Bulayla1426 why he sound different... he try to give every word his own touch...😅
I am sunni, but to be honest I found your rebuttal to be weak. You are just beating around the bush. please come up rebuttal of every hadees Ammar quoted with reference, page number and book and the publisher. I have double checked everything ammar has said. I am eager to hear you reply. Please help me, I am feeling uneasy about what I have been thought my entire life
Brother we shais are not all the same, as a shia myself I don't agree with Ammar on everything but his last vid on Hafsa/Ayesha had a very strong argument. Brother read About Ghadir khum, and what happened in saqeefa
You see how Ammar twisted the word 'happly', I found him dishonesty on this, he mocked Allah subhana hu wa taala directly really ... What else he was on his bad intentions? BTW Is tattoo allowed in shiaism?
I am sunni and i found his rebuttal more than sufficient barak allahu feehu. He showed multiple instances of lies and misattributions by ammar.
If you had a specific thing maybe mention it and we can try to help inschallah. But if all things of ammar you still find convincing...
Even this interpretation of the hadith about fitnah from the east coming from aisha's home ..idk man. No words I can say in ramadan
Thank you for being honest, I encourage you to continue looking for the truth may Allah guide you
Completely agree with you, this was a weak rebuttal. His responses through out this was based of opinion not whats written.
Sated Ammar is pointing out exactly what's written. That to in Sunni literature only. And through the Quran. And what we got back was no he's misunderstood it when it's written clearly.
I mean basically all you tried to accomplish in this video was trying to downplay his words but you didn’t actually refute anything he said with solid evidence and it took you this long to make a response to one of his topics what about the other videos 😂
Only if you listen to it properly instead of typing stupid stuff then you would of understood
lol he is literally saying this is not sahih bukhari because that book doesnt have brackets @@MuhammedKus-iu7ls 😂😂
@@MuhammedKus-iu7ls understand what bro? They guy commenting said it as it is no refuting no evidence end of story. Khalaas
farid's entire schtick is "i know better so i wont address any arguments"
People always be targeting Islam for no reason
why do you have shaytan in your name?
@@Adam-iz5kh Making fun of Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism)
Twelver Shias are not Muslims.
@@lithium8847-er2oj Why?
Because they believe in prophets after the the last and final messenger this takes you out of the fold of islam and they go against the Quran ofcourse
You need to do this reaction academically(give reference from sunni book) If not, your comment only based on your opinion, emotion and it is weak argument. Salam Ramadan, brother!
I don't understand. He showed him to be dishonest with his usages of sources . Do you need a hadith saying that ammar says a book is from abdulwahab when it's not lol?
@@ashketchum1793 Have you watched his (Sayed Ammar) video? He uses the Sahih Books and Holy Quran. In the end, you make your judgement.
Show sources
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@sadikkadom9566 Yes, he uses them DISHONESTLY. Make your judgement. One who points out mistakes honestly, or one who dishonestly uses Sahih books (but not sahih hadith lmao) and Qur'an.
I am not satisfied with this response. Ammar Nakshawani came with strong evidence from our books. I hope you can clarify. It has created a lot of doubts.
okay 'Peter'
You missed the part 'As a sunni' in your comment .
I know you do taqiyya but this is embarrassing 😂
@@Check_my_playlists You can't label anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view as a shia doing taqiyya lol.
@@iceycones654 1. I have seen these types of comments a lot recently and farid exposed a similar comment in one of his video
2. Because of this concept of taqiyya shias can't be trusted.
Look at that comment,this peter guy is definitely a shia lol .
@@Check_my_playlists What do you mean by exposed? And generalizing a whole group of people because of a concept? Do you even know what Taqqiya means? It means to hide your identity in fear of death or execution, this peter guy doesn't seem to be in any danger. Also this is what the Quran says about this,
"Surah 3:28, “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.”
So while he used your books and quoted direct sources you just engaged in ad hominem attacks on him and twisting words instead of actually refuting any of what he said? Sounds about right
Exactly lol this clown Farid has no comebacks to Sayed Ammar
Such a weak response - classic Sunni response when the truth is clear even within your own books.. ‘oh they’re plotting because they loved the prophet’ ‘they would make the prophet upset because they were joking’ ‘the chain of narration is weak’. If only you defended the real Prophet like you defend your idols. It is a known fact and even among Sunni academics this is known to be a verse about these two wives (Hafsa and Aisha). God just decides to reveal a verse to defend the prophet and threaten these two if they continue to mock the Prophet out of bants? God doesn’t know that they were jealous because they ‘loved’ him?
Wake up ya Akhi. Why do you make these people infallible and always find an excuse?
Glorification of the sahaba at the prophet (saws) and his family’s (as) expense,… eVERy tIme 😮😢
Jazakallah Akhi
You clearly didn’t watch the video properly. Go watch it again and especially about the verse of repentance
Notice how they always use their annoying tone to get their point across. Ironically every ashura they smack themselves anyway, so they’re losing brain cells by the year. That’s why their arguments get weaker overtime lol
😅
@Azharq2023 annoying voice? So he's voice is more important than his message? Remember mocking people was one of the attributes of kafir during the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) so this makes me think you guys are just focusing on being funny then learning the truth.
Ok sons of bidah 👍🏽
@@Syy-q5h clown shia shut up
Man after seeing him share a clip of Omar suleiman describing Aishah and how rosy and sugar coated it is - as if there are no issues at all, I’d rather face the truth from Ammar than be blinded by Sunni scholars.
Thank u Syed ammar your truths have rattled so many cages n the true colours of those who still refuse or deny even their own books by twisting and turning it as they twist n turn the words of Allah swt to fit their agendas!
Facts ❤
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
Are you saying it's alright for a wife to lie and say her husband mouth smells just for fun? What's your defense? We learn Rasullah never lied even in jokes. And how is Aisha even 16 in medina?
He is saying ammar is an inconsistent liar slandering the wives of the prophet salallahu aleihi wa salam who stayed married to him till his death in the holy month of ramadan in public .
Hope this helps your understanding .
@@ashketchum1793but is it alright to lie when you are jealous? Is this what aisha is teaching. And what does age have to do with anything
No one is infalliable except the prophet pbuh everyone has a qareen with them which is shytan that tempts them expect the prophet pbuh also keep in mind I think Aisha and had sa ra repented afterwards that innixdent
I want to see it in the books - where is it mentioned Aishah was 16. Brother Farid needs to point it out
@@ashketchum1793 Reading the Quran and "sahih" Sunni hadiths = Slander?
17:50 the reason “it’s a test” is valid for the question of why prophet Muhammad stayed married, is because Aisha is one of, if not THE central figure in the Sunni/Shia schism
It’s a test for every Muslim after him - when faced with a question like Jamal, whose side are you on?
I notice some sneaky language you used at the beginning… aisha was merely “involved” with Jamal…
Why dance around it? The weight of what she did, compared against all the Hadiths we have about Ali’s status? Don’t whitewash the battle of Jamal, while being ready to criticize others for their creative uses of language.
Did her father Abu Bakr not kill those who went against his Khilaafa?
So by keeping Aisha around, this becomes the ultimate test for every Muslim to pick a side. You simply cannot be intellectually honest and remain neutral
Once you start putting the Hadiths in favor of Ahlulbayt, and comparing the actions of some sahabis against those Hadiths, then you can see that early Islamic figures were not exactly the most pure of people
So then the question becomes, who do you take your religion from? If Omar/Aisha/Abu Bakr are not good enough, then WHO IS?
Enter the pure household of Allah’s messenger, which solves all the moral problems a new studying Muslim would have… both through prophetic wisdom passed down and purity of character guaranteed by Allah
Great analysis
They say ,. Find a clear proof of any Imam(as) in Quran ,. I wanna see where a prophet (as) appointed his best friend to succeed him 😮😅
@@jaleel42do you deny hadith Thaqalayn?
@@Virgoingaway re read what I wrote
Of course they take it from them. Omar called the Prophet (saw) a delirious and they agreed what else you want as proof.
Nah Ammar won this one, your video is very weak and this comes from a Muslim who doesn’t consider himself Shia or Sunni
Brother Farid, I bought your book on the martyrdom of hussein ra. InshaAllah I will read it. It's a bengali translation.
@@ahmedmuniyat9213 কারবালা বাস্তবতা বনাম কল্পকথা
লেখক : ফরিদ আল বাহরাইনি
প্রকাশনী : ইলম হাউজ পাবলিকেশন
Your response to Syed Ammar is not strong at all if you watch any of his videos he uses Sunni books and gives the book name published hadeeth number and author and volume and makes his case from Sunni books and Quran to outline the Shia view of Aisha and Hafsa all you did was reiterate what he basically said and just give your own opinions but didn’t give hard concrete sources that lead to a solid believable conclusion
Shia ..worship graves and 12 semi-deity imams, believe in distorting the Qur’an, declare 120,000 companions to be infidels, and attack the honor of the Mothers of the Believers 🤦♂️🤣
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
You claim that these people are the righteous of believers and second to the Prophet (saw), all Sayed Ammar is doing is showing you from your OWN literature and Sahih texts that this CLEARLY is utter nonsense. To say these people are human and they made mistakes and so on so on but you keep them as your TOP guide to the Sunnah of the Prophet is delusional, it is simple, we Shia do not want them, we do not need them, Allah, his messenger, Quran and his Ahlulbayt are “sufficient”for us. if you truly follow Umar’s teachings then you should remove all Hadith literature from your houses and studying as Umar said to the prophet of GOD in Sahih al Bukhari, “The Quran is sufficient for us”, we do not need to get you a pen and paper! May Allah guide us All.
Lmao. Clearly the points you're making in this video are absurd, taking parts of the ayah and saying that Allah is praising them. How blind could you guys be wallah? That's the problems us shias/rawafidh/kuffar/murtad (whatever you wanna call us, it's quite expected from you guys now) have with you, maybe not with the certain personalities in fact. You praise them to such an extent that they clearly don't deserve. It's clear as day. When you say Aisha was the most beloved, best wife bla bla all nonsense, that for us is the biggest disrespect to Sayyeda Khadija (AS). And we praise the ahlul bayt (AS) because they for sure well deserve that praise, plus we have clear evidence from your literature with nothing that can disregard their status.
Who was more beloved to prophet (sa)? Khadiza or Ali (ra)?
@@AH_5878 what kind of stupid comparative question this is? Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was the wife of Rasul Allah while imam Ali (AS) was his successor. Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was his most beloved among the wives and imam Ali (AS) was his most beloved among the companions.
From what gathered so far his points were : she's 16 = she's a young innocent lady. And also replace happily with happly
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 haha yes. Also, I'm trying to find the word 'happly' in the dictionary. Couldn't find in the one we have on the internet, lemme know if someone is a Shakespeare fan or smth, maybe it is a word.
@@iamibrahim99
the word is ''Haply''... which means by chance. There could be a typo in the book I guess.
May Allah help u Sunnis. With u guys the verse “it’s not the eyes that’s are blind, it’s the heart” is well and true. Syed Ammar using ur books to prove u wrong and u still can’t accept the truth
Facts they have no imam.
Facts 😂
As a Sunni, I agree that Ammar was impressive in his arguments, but Farid was very weak in the rebuttal
Syed Ammar literally made crazy conclusions and you are here with your confirmation biases without listening to what Farid actually has to say.
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm crazy conclusions? 😂😂 he read the facts from ur books and told u what they said? He didn’t conclude these things… ur scholars did. This farid brother is trying his best to escape the truth by looking for silly ways out
Nice try fooling the ummah without showing proofs, so that they dont go read the Quran and their own books.
All of the ahlulbayt were given the merit of shahadat, including the Holy Prophet pbuh. And the ones to kill Him pbuh were his own wives. May Allah never forgive them
I memorzie whole Quran with meaning (learned arabic for that) and ahlul bayt in the Quran is the wives of the prophet (sa).
@@condorianonegdiffsgokuthe reality is Quran cannot be understood with our Hadith. If you read the tafsir of the Ayat ul tathir it is clear who the members of the Ahlulbayt are, and the prophet makes it clear in the Hadith that it is not his wife/ wives.
@@May-mp9vw
The verses of Quran are not random sentences stiched together. They have coherency, order and a story. And it is very clear if you read the verses serially, the wives (ra) are part of ahlul bayt. The hadiths have a weaker strength than what is clear in the Quran. And our sunni hadiths don't even exclude the wives. And I don't read shia tafsirs. Sunni tafsirs say this verse refers to the wives (ra). Based on context the term ahlul bayt might be used for the wives or it might be used for the family of Ali (ra) or for both. In this verse, however, it is primarily directed to the wives and it indirectly may include other members as an addition.
If 11:73 includes sarah (as), there is no reason to doubt the verse of ahlul bayt includes the wives of prophet (saws). It's very similar in structure.
20:48
And that's one of the problems with the Shia, they are fine with the prophet warning people about Aisha then continue his marriage with her.
And when you asked a Shia would you continue your marriage to your wife if your wife gone against Ali!!? Or if she is a Kaffir, or if she is a Zaniah?
And they always refuse or divorce their wives, but they are fine with the prophet being that.
It is the hate they have been growing with that blinded them with such obvious facts.
First of all the prophet isn't your regular human being, he is the best of the creations of Allah (SWT) and about prophets staying with their kafir wives the Quran has given an example in the same surah 66, where Allah (SWT) talks about the wives of prophet Nuh(As) and Lot(As).
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them)
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them)
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut stayed with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
Allah literally told Aisha to fix up coz she betrayed him 😂😂. Allah said he can divorce her and he would be happy even though Allah says he does not like divorce.
indeed Ayesha prayed and did good things but also she fought against the forth Khalif which was not a good thing.
See my video on al-Jamal.
How funny you said it’s private matter , if it’s private why Allah would mention it in Quran !!
Beautiful question. I'll share an answer on twitter.
If it's public why doesn't it mention them by name . Please listen to the video properly
I mean the Prophet SAW didn’t marry like 50 women. So if it’s saying 2 wives in Quran, it doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out who could be.
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed.. It fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 don’t say Allah fails
Bro, you are not saying the truth. Please study more and carefully, so that you can see the truth with your naked eyes Habibi.
Mahe Ramadhan Kareem to you and your loved ones.
May ALLAH grants you hidayah through the blessings of this Holy Month.
Wallahi, I can’t stand his way of talking, let alone his broken aqida…
Same. He sounds like emasculated zesty transgender part of the rainbow community
Same my man, I felt like muting D':
same here.. ammar’s voice is as irritating as appus n hatun…
@@eerievon2208 Him saying Ibn Kuthayr was the peak for me 💀
@@ifad 🤣🤣.. ibn kuthayr.. too much persian slang.. 🤣🤣🤣.. oh someone please make ammar bite the curb… 🤣🤣
Alhmdulil Allah for shia and followers of ahlul bayte when even the sunnies can not find fault in tbem yet but we find many contradiction in Aisha and the first 3 khalifa of sunnies.
Kaafir bark elsewhere.
what
@@Mayochup191 they make their own delusions lol
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm we make it? when its even in your OWN books? you guys you guys are blind lol now it makes sense that when Allah says in Quran that "its not the eyes that are blind but the hearts". we will see in hereafter in sha Allah
@@asefhosseini3074 yeah count me out from venerating people so highly to worship them and to make claims of infallibility and divinity to certain individuals who were somehow oppressed at the same time. You guys are in a cult and the sooner you realize the better. May Allah guide you all.
4:33
He speaks as if God were like humans Sometimes he is ready and sometimes he is not ready .
Sorry Farid my guy but u are dodging everything without prove. Ammar showed everything from Sunni books
The fact that he looks so satisfied takes the cake. By the way, Allah exonerated Aisha, the mother of the believers. FULL STOP.
Allah also said u n one side n me one one side.
If Allah SWT even did, that exoneration happened BEFORE this incident
@@user_db769 Allah says, "The Prophet is more worthy of the believers than themselves, and his wives are their mothers." [Surah al-Ahzab 33:6]
@@user_db769I love prophet Muhammad Sallahu Alayahi Wa Salaam more than all my family combined and love those whom he loved like Aisha R.A.
why does he keep saying "kuthayr"?
cringe fr
We focus on our worship and religion and they focus on us
Seriously? Really? Who’s got a HUUUGE number of hate books against the other? Who’s whole sect is based upon the hate of the other? Who’s sect has got some dumb ass stories or bidas about the other? Think u need to reevaluated ur life if that’s what u think
So sunnis have never made vids on shias? Ur not that bright r u?
We’re not the ones chopping Sunnis heads. Destroying their civilizations. And funding terrorism.
The Shia are the only ones helping the Sunni Palestinians right now. While the 1.9billion Sunni watch and pray from home.
We are focused on you you’re right. Focused on protecting you and sharing the truth.
Speaker’s Corner bashes Shia every other week. What are you smoking
And yeah it’s kinda hard to NOT focus on the Bakri sect when all sectarian militias in the Middle East & South Asia come from them lol
Y’all need to start acting human
Worst response I've seen in a while xD watch the whole video of Syed Ammar, fear god for your cherry picking.
And you failed to actually falsify his claims. Watch his full lecture. Aisha got exposed, cry about it. Because I’m pretty sure Allah and his prophet love a person so much they’d threaten them by saying god is on his side and so is Gabriel and the believers and the angels. It’s not a cop out to say she was a test. Aisha was a test. Everything in this life is a test, Ammar bin yaser said himself, verily Allah has tested you with Aisha to see if you choose him or her. Your arguments are based on emotion rather than intellectual enquiry grow up
Literally you’ll happily say Aisha being a test is a cop out because it emotionally gets to you but you’ll happily say the children in Gaza are dying because they’re being tested. Why is one a cop out and one isn’t? A test has a purpose, ie to choose Allah or her. Because whether you like it or not, Aisha has demonstrated many evidences or herself being against Allah. And literally refuted your own claim, you said at the beginning, if you have a opinion on a personality like hitler, giving charity this will be seen as bad. You’ve literally done the same thing. You’ve assumed Aisha is a good person so any Hadith narrated from her must be from a good place like kisa, why have you assumed that? That’s based on emotion. Again the shia just show that there is a lot of evidence to show that Aisha is shady person and thus we must dissociate from her
Brother @Farid, Syed Ammar made it clear that during his series #4 and #5, he will show evidence that the Quran and Sunni books expose Aisha and Hafsa. In your final comment you make the claim, 19:19 "To summarize, Allah (swt) never exposed Aisha and the Prophet (pbuh) never exposed Aisha despite what Ammar wants to believe." Can you make a video responding to each of the verses in the Quran and Hadiths from Sunni books that Syed Ammar used as evidence from his series #4 and #5 where Allah (swt) and the Prophet (pbuhaf) exposed Aisha. This should address your points 1, 2 and 3 you raise at the end of your video.
I'm super glad I watched this. Nakshawani very effectively why the Shia narrative makes sense...and the Sunni narrative does not. I do respect Farid, though, and hope he and his followers come to the truth.
Yea right
I think if you pointed out how Allah had regard the people who spread rumors about Aisha’s supposed “infidelity” *Astagfirullah* and how they were condemned it would make this video stronger by making it clear that they are committing the same action that had those people condemned.
Rafida focus on criticizing the wives and ashaab of prophet Muhammad A.S. Make the jealousy out of love turn out to be enmity. May Allah guide them or curse them.
2:43 such people are clowns
Aisha and hafsa (may allah be pleased with them both)are wives of the prophet
Good womens are for good mens
Bad womens are for bad womens
If prophet Muhammad(pbuh) is the best
Then his wives are also the best
People focus on worship and these rafidha focus on us😂❤
They are real kufar they worship 12 demigods
Rafidah are divorced from the Quran and the seerah. Rafidah are only interested in tabloid fabricated narrations....
Silly shias...trix are for kids!!
This video is a clear example that you are Ahlul Sunnah is focusing on the Rafidha. If they weren't, this video wouldn't even exist. Especially because it is a direct response to Ammar.
@@Adam-iz5kh
Shiaism is a myth about 12 demigods.
Islam is about Allah
@@Adam-iz5kh Ammar was the one who started these accusations lol. What are you on?
It’s not just an insult to the mothers of the believers radhi allahu anyu but an insult against the prophet sallahu alayhi wasalam! How can you call yourself a follower of his and insult his wives and imply that he isn’t a good enough judge of character to know who he’s marrying?
They're الكفار just like the so-called "Quraniyun".
Weak response to be honest. I’ve seen quite a few response videos to Ammar‘s lectures this Ramadan, already, and none of them actually give a substantial counter-argument. The responses are either a mockery, or using other Shia scholars opinions or like in this video, picking out small things and not even giving a response that actually considers the argument of Aisha, for example, being in the wrong. A bunch of dodging around.
Also if you claim some Hadiths from Bukhari are weak, then please do me a favour and stop claiming it to be Sahih and 100% authentic.
They have no rebuttal whatsoever. They result to name calling and bs . Their entire religion is brainwashed. I’m so happy to be a Shia.
😅🎉👏
That’s what I’ve been saying. They seem to all sound like excuses.
Now they don't want Sayyidah Aisha AS to even be human, and to be a robot like the rawafidh🤦🏼♂
Great rebuttal. We shouldn't even be debating any of this when the Quran clearly says the wives of the Prophet are the mothers of the believers. How can the mothers of the believers be disbelievers
Ask yourself why would Allah reveals such verses about some of these wives ?!!!
@@almoola1for context
They are the mother of the believers in the sense that you can't marry them after the prophet,that's what Allah means there.Can you marry your mother?
What caused Aisha RA to fight imam Ali in Jamal... clearly shows even if you are related to prophet doesn't mean you are always on right path. May allah be pleased with her she had done damage to the islam too
When you love aisha more than prophet (Sawa), this is why god keeps you in darkness and turn you blind, I pray to allah to guide my all sunni brothers and sisters to the reality and help them to accept the truth
19:14 - no, this doesn’t sound like an evil Nasibi. As a strict Shia, it’s inappropriate to say Aisha is purely evil. Outside of prophets and the Ahlulbayt, everyone is shades of gray. Vast vast majority of Shia scholars condemn Aisha’s actions but we are not Allah to say whether she’s in heaven or hell.
However, Islam is not a joke, not a game, and not something to be taken from people who have both purity and impurity.
Aisha is not a purely bad character, but her actions, both against Ali, jealousy of Khadijah, doubting the prophethood of Muhammad (SAWA) disqualify her from being a source of authority when you DO have alternatives.
If no alternatives, then Aisha would just be a mufti or sheika. But when the question is Ali or Aisha, there should be zero hesitation
And if you are to say: well we love both
Does you really love your father if you don’t obey him? Do you love Allah if you never obey him?
So if we say we love Ahlulbayt, then obedience is mandatory. الثقلين وآية المودّة Now we have to see what these so called Ahlulbayt actually said, who their enemies were, what they taught, how they lived
If you do the above, then you’re Shiat Ahlulbayt and Allahuma barik lak
As a Sunni, that’s exactly what I say, Allah will judge, he is the only judge. Who are we to decide when we weren’t even born and did not see over them. Hope we have Sunni Shia unity, what you said is a good example of how we can come to common terms and let go of the grey areas! And focus on the most important things in religion
Its actually sickening to see people curse, say bad about the mothers of the believers (may Allah be pleased with them)when Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala has forgiven them and is pleased with them. End of story.
Good video, but if the story of the Prophet pbuh and Maria is not true, what about Sunan an Nasai 3959?
It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed:
"O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse.
(Authentic according to darussalam)
نَحْنُ النَّار والاِعْصَار مَهْمَا صَار
لَنْ نَرْكَعْ علي!
كَا الزِّلزَال لِلْاَرْذَالْ كُلُّنْ قَال
لَنْ نَرْكَعْ علي!
عَمْرُوْ عَابِسُنْ بَشْرُ
مُسْلِمُنْ بَدْرُ
نَفْتَدِيْكَا نَفْتَدِيْكَا
فَخْرُ يَوْمَ عَاشُوْرَاء نُسْعِدُ الزَّهْرَاء
يا حسين يا حسين
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥
😂😂😂
May allah guide our sunni brothers and sisters to the correct path
You mean the grave-worshipping, flagellating, legalised prostitution, worshipping in demigods, 'version' of Islam?
Bro, he is literally reading Quran and the commentary. When are you going to even listen to him? When are you going to actually read Quran and the commentary yourselves? This isn't rocket science. Put your sectarianism aside and open your eyes. Read Quran. Ask yourself, how were Ahlulbayt (a.s.) were respected and treated in the history? Keep it that simple and start from there.
Bro it sounds like your confirming what the Shia guy said
Because it is undeniable
@@Adam-iz5kh
In your shia demigods dream
@@uthman2281 Allah (swt) is my lord.
@@Adam-iz5kh
Yeah + 12 demigods
@@uthman2281 La ilaha illallah ☝️
Rafida are like St.paul. He tampered the risala of Isa (Al), while rafida also tries to undermine the risala of rasululah by tampering the quran, where it says she is a pure women and is a mother of the believers.
The actualy paul of islam is called umar ibn khattab , the one who introduced bidas in islam.
a polytheist, dajjal found.@@noorhussain6462
Come face me in real life I’ll fix you
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
Do you know WHY that verse was revealed? And how it relates to Talha the Sahabi?
All you're doing is defending the people you "worship" without any real talk. I am a sunni, and I find your arguments baseless. This nakshwani guy is to the point, explaining what is in the Quran and sahih books. It's right there, there is no two ways about it. And people saying "mother of the believers" like she was the only wife/ves of the Prophet. The title "mother of the believers" was given because they could not re marry after the prophet passed on. Ammars lectures are an eye opener, and you better accept the fact that ahle sunna hides these things not wanting people to know about the filth that happened with the prophet. There's no explanation. Shame on you
Alhamdulillah
Brother, you are playing with words and not negating what Sayed Ammar was saying. You are down playing the actions or softening. Mashallah, you have many books behind you, and would of been better for you for showed us forgiveness from the wives of the Holy Prophet (saws) that was they have done was wrong. Or at the very least show another sahih hadith negating one of the Sayed Ammar's sahih hadith (under discussion) that he was wrong.
But it is ok, because we will all go back to our Lord and we will be judged on our conclusions.
P.S It's really unfortunate that some people that comment here are saying the Shias are not Muslim. Most Sunni scholars, whilst disagreeing obviously with the Shi’a on matters of difference, have accepted them within the Muslim community and do not consider them as following another religion.
You basically confirmed everything he said lol
Are you deaf or blind of just absolute more on?
12:34 The book “رسالة في الرد على الرافضة” has been attributed to multiple authors in various sources:
Muhammad Hayyat ibn Ibrahim al-Sindhi1, an Islamic scholar known for his contributions to the Hanafi and Hanbali schools of thought.
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the founder of Wahhabism, whose works include a book with a similar title
Muhammad bin Khalil bin Yusuf Abu Hamid al-Balbisi al-Shafi’i, also known as Al-Ramli Al-Maqdisi, who has a book with the same title.
Bummer I was trying not to be sectarian or get into polemics at all this Ramadan,… cuz of you know Gaza,..
But I have been in the Sunni mosque all month so far,. Except one day,. And praying like you, I see you as brothers ,. But I also hear a lot of snide comments from ignorance,. (Not towards me but in general/ probably cuz they watch these dawah bro channels) this is why,. We practice taqiyya,. I haven’t subverted or even preached one word ,. Of Shia thought ,. Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) would be proud 😊
Anyways it sucks your books that are sahih are not sahih as soon as our argument appears,… as sahih,. Get over it Gaza is starving 😢
Aisha and Hafsa were like the wives of Noah and Lott. They never divorced them, yet they were evil. Aisha and Hafsa were evil the same way.
Prove that Nuh (as) and Lut (as) knew about the reality of their wives.
Where they punished the same way ???
@@rcmysm9123it was example of betrayal and disbelief unlike incase of hafsa and Aisha while Ammar is exaggerating
@@rcmysm9123 where's the comparison your making your own comparison again it was again refering to the disbeliefing wives of prophet not the other thing apart
@@rcmysm9123 when it comes to ppl like something obvious doesn't matter
He did it because he loves them? 😂😂😂😂 at this point I can’t even argue it’s beyond stupid!
So you think prophet (SA) made halal haram at whim?
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku another stupid response. I think it’s this level of stupidity is common in responses!
@@Syy-q5h
The Quran says he sought their pleasure. So he didn't actually make halal haram in the true sense but rather decided that their pleasure is a must so he needs to refrain. Why did he seek their pleasure?
@@Syy-q5h
You are too dumb to understand my point.
Why did he seek their pleasure?
I've checked from sunni sources and these 2 wives of the holy prophet were not good
Fareed, brother, can you answer the videos against you from "Muhammad" (Hadeeth rejector)?
Specify a point worth refuting.
Mate your knowledge and explanation is no where near syed Amman naqshwani.Explanation has been given from Sunni books not his own text
Can you please confirm whether the books he is narrating from authenic sunni books.
If you watch his video you'll get the answer
Watch the video
Please watch the video, because unfortunately this video does no justice. He is reading only for Sahih Books and Holy Quran.
Allah exposed them
When he revealed the verse and then the prophet Recite it, you think people didn't ask people didn't have an inclination to who he Was referring to A roamer mill went around and everybody knew to whom the verse was Referring to And as for The prophet peace be upon literary pointed at her house. And you deny when the truth is literally in your face, you put blinders on.
Facts ❤
These shia preachers are truly making their place in Jahannam deeper and deeper with these statements of individuals Allah (God) stated clearly in the Quran he is PLEASED WITH. May (God) Guide them before the inevitable reality of death
Radiallahu-anhum
If the truth makes me to be in hellfire then let it be. I don't have problem with that because I know the truth and Allah will reveal it with Mahdi (PBUH).
Im sorry but, those were from your own books? He was literally reading the stuff from your books, like what???
Your response is weak and emotive. You provide no evidence. If my brothers and sisters listened to Nakshawani they would too have question marks about what Muslims have been taught since they were small. I’m very intrigued Ammar Nakshawani’s lectures and they are impressive with history evidence using solid literature. My mind has been opened.
Did Farid really compare Aisha and Hafsa with Hitler ? 😂
More like I compared how people can treat Hitler is a more objective way than how some Shias treat the wives in their understanding of the narratives.
Don't say the 'wives', we respect them. It's only those 2. And I think Sayed Ammar has clarified that stance as well.
@@Ali-ti8hfThey are both your mothers.
@@everythingandroidois
Only in the sense that we can’t marry them. This “mothers” verse you quote was Allah’s response to Talha’s proclamation he wanted to marry Aisha, and he was a so-called “righteous Sahabi” at the same time
You cannot have it both ways, we either have logic or we have this blind Nasibi idolization
You clearly have comprehension issues
Hazrat Lots wife was disobedient, divorce her.
Hazrat Nuhs son was disobedient, disown him.
Even if its not "happly" as in pleasure, ALLAH is looking at POSSIBILITIES for divorce...
...but didn't.
Allah says he will do many things to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) if he does such and such, this does not mean it will ever happen.
Rafzis worship abululu and have a big shrine (temple) of that majoosi in iran
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 daleel like yours. FYI both the wives were destroyed like other people in front of the Prophets. But u have given your allegiance to majoosis and yahoodis (remember your forefather, ibn sahab the prime enemy of Islam)
@@admin202
Your Umar literally tried to recite TORAH in front of our holy Prophet, who’s following Judaism now buddy😂😂
Am i the only one who felt like this was a clear rebuttal and the evidence of the weakness in the chain of the hadith that the Brother Ammar accepts basically disintegrates all his points? As well as Ammar taking these english footnotes and treating them like real evidence? Alhamdullilah, thank you Farid for your excellent analysis as always and may Allah make clear the haqq from the batil
يا ذاكر الأصحاب...
Jazakallah khair brother Farid. You have splendidly and concisely explained the background. That is enough for seekers of truth. And those whose heart has disease will not understand.
When sahaba asked the Prophet pbuh, "who do you love the most," he replied "Ayesha" and they asked amongst men, he replied "her father." This is enough for us to believe.
May Allah Ta'ala bless the souls of all the mothers of believers. Aameen
May Allah be pleased with all the wives of the Prophet pbuh. I'll be honest I genuinely find it kind of funny and endearing that Aisha ra and Hafsa ra clearly had a BFF relationship going on lol. How many hadith do we have where they are both involved 😂 it's nice to see they were actually normal people and they were pretty young as well and clearly still a bit immature and acting like it. Alhumdulillah that Allah never exposes our own immaturity when we were young, how many of us have done silly things as teenagers lol
You can trivilialize serious matters like that as being immature??
Aisha mocked Lady Khadija’s (AS) age & appearance in front of our Prophet. You find that behavior acceptable?
salaams brother. I came across a Shia on social media who pointed out a few hadith in Abd al-Razzaq's Musannaf asserting that Ibn Umar (RA) held the view that taraweeh/Qiyam should not be prayed in the masjid. could you perhaps make a video on this?
Sayyed ammar made a whole video about the taraweeh prayer and all of the sources are from sunni books, I recommend you go watch it and inshallah Allah swt will open your eyes to the truth
@@bubblegumniece8952 He has a bad habit of using inauthentic hadith to make points against the sahaba, whilst presenting them as if they are sahih. otherwise he misrepresents/misinterprets the sahih ones. That alone makes him untrustworthy, and I dont think it is wise as a layman to take knowledge from such a person.
@@Shobob okay how about this, you go to Sayed Ammar's video about the taraweeh prayers, get your own copy of sahih Al-bukhari and other Hadiths mentioned and open the Hadith to which he opens to. I can see your sincere heart is willing to go on the right path. all this propaganda you heard about Sayed Ammar are pure hate speeches so don't listen to others and see for yourself
@@Shobob Hey, i have personally viewed some of the videos regarding these controversial topics, and i must say, not out of bias, hate nor lie; that most, if not ALL of the evidence used are compiled from the 6 'believed' sahihs; through this, Amaar Nakshawani clealy shows the authenticity of the book, and reads the wording of the 'sahih' hadith/s word for word. Im sure that its not too hard for you to make your own judgment through the use of pure logic and clearly shown evident sources. So, please go and watch the entirety of the video, and i can assure you that you will be further educated regarding this topic.
Hope this clarifies a few things.
@@soldier_x7212 Ive already watched his video on taraweeh. I was not impressed lol.
Great video Akhi. Jazakallah Khairan for making it
JazakAllahu kiran
Please continue to rebuke all these videos. I have been watching them from day one because he pulls out every source and reads from them directly. I am unsure of attending taraweeh in jamah after watching his video because it Is clear from the hadiths that the prophet (PBUH) advised to do them individually in the homes. If you can make a video on that it would be helpful to clarify my confusion.
Follow the Sunnah of our holy Prophet brother, not the Sunnah of Umar
You don’t have to go full Shi’a yet and commemorate the martyrdom of Husayn (AS) at the hands of Yazid etc., but at least both of our sects can agree on the clear instructions to avoid all innovations correct?
And Allah only judges intentions, as long as we try our best to practice the truth he is the most Merciful
As always no response from Sufis against rafidis. Zindeeq people
What are you saying?
It's not like Muslims are supposed to hunt down rafidhis for being rafidhis.
Most people do other stuff.
Also, Sufis, for all their flaws, do rebuke Shias for speaking negatively about the Prophet SAWW wives when confronting them.
Prove from the books just like Syed Amaar does i think it would give us a better understanding. Additionally, could i understand which Sunni Book or books specifically would be consider authentic and/or which can be considered 100% authentic?
Theres literally no word in the dictionary as happly...its a typo and the word is supposed to be happily. Do not misguide people by making new definitions
Haply is a word in dictionary and word used in arabic is عَسَىٰ which means perhaps/Maybe. Idk which Kinda Dictionary and Quran you are using and only one who is misguiding people is you at the moment.
@@belabarlina6627your mothers lol 😂
It's unfortunate for muslims that they don't reflect upon the Qur'an especially Surah At-Tahrim.
No offence that Br. Ammar sounds like a quack, even the way he says “Sallallahu Alaihi Wa alai"eats words" annoys me. If he cant even respect and send peace and blessing to our prophet properly, anything that he says is least credible to my ears.
He is Not a brother he is a liar a 12 demigods worshipper
wait what is wrong with that
@@Adam-iz5kh might be nothing for some, but my personal psychological reactance to avoid such people, the marvelous Quran person also used to say "Salaam un alaikum" it might be right, but it sounded disingenuous to me, then he went and made up new weird esoteric translation of Quran, so I avoid listening to him too.
It is just these small quirks of some people whom after listening for a while, I get this feeling that they are misleading me.
@iznij3284 Sallallahu alaihi w alai has a different meaning than sallallahu walaihi wasalam. It means may peace and blessing be upon him ﷺ and his family, as opposed to just him.
@@Adam-iz5kh thanks for the info, I will still follow my sixth sense and avoid such people.
Unbelievable the deception these people are capable of.
Absolutely insane!
brother keep responding and exposing this guy cuz he's been yapping a lot lately.
I wish he would see this or that you would say this in real life and he'd overhear you.
@@jaclynholland-strauss7054or what? He gonna smoke some shisha or get another tattoo lmao?
You goof
Exposing what, he is reading from Sahih Books and the Holy Quran. At the end you make up your own judgement.
@@sadikkadom9566 the judgment is already in the Quran lmao Shi’ites cannot prove imamah/wilayah from the Kitab of Allah 😂
Shi’ites love to read Sahih collections of Hadith, what are you hiding in your own books?
Why don’t we open up Al Kafi and see what’s in there, hmm?
@@dontwatchmee I encourage you to read.
Hazrat Aisha mother of believers died in 678 at age 67. Check for yourselves. Therefore born in 611. And married in 623. Therefore her marriage consummation happened at the age of ..... Calculate by yourselves
13
If this correct, then it is not far off from mother Maryam giving birth to Isa (A) at 13/14.
Why would Allah reveal a VERSE in the Quran, if it's simply about jealousy?
I wonder too, and it just happens to be about the same people who’s fathers stole saqifa, appointed Muwaia the governor of sham, started the war of Jamal etc…. Why is it it’s always the same characters????
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
The end of sunni deception is on the horizon. You have never rebuttled any shia narrative sufficiently..May Allah guide you non shia to the truth of the family of the rasul. (S.a.a. w.a..w.s)
What a pathetic response
If you are talking about how important al zahra was from Aisha’s own words then why do you sunnis call Aisha the one that you admit done so much bad as the mother of the believers but I hav never heard any of you call Fatima al zahra the mother of the believers. Why because she is the prophets daughter and not abu bakrs daughter? You say we worship the ahlulbayt more like you worship the sahaba and will never accept the wrong that they did! But on the day of judgement you can’t act blind when Allah swt exposes your arrogant blind heart
Quran 33:6 refers to his wives as the mothers of the believers.
Such a weak and emotional response. Very disappointing
Majus
Aisha went to war with Ali enough said all of this back and forth is a total waste of time. Whos side are you on? Its clear you all have to go against Aisha or you going against the Caliph Ali? This for me is a huge red flag in Sunni Islam. I 100% would be going to war against Aisha but will you be making the same decision your stuck between a roch and a hard place.
My brother your evidence is weak against brother Ammar. Good job with trying, but you have not proved anything sufficient against Ammar evidence.
When we ask rafidhis to prove their false religion from their own books: *opens sahih bukhari and draws his own imaginary conclusions*
lmaooo true. These guys have no shame and I saw Ammaar's videos on Mut'ah, I had a good laugh. I can't believe these guys are real
Imagine if I am someone who has no clue, and imagine if I am Shia. Why wouldn't I believe in what Syed is saying? I will be listening to him daily, and take everything he says as truth. Imagine how much wrong info I am being fed and how much things are manipulated enough to deceive people like "me" to develop hatred against pious wives and companions of Prophet Muhammed PBUH. And yes the hatred for Mohammed Bin AbdulWahab (Rahima Ullah), an attempt to discredit all his efforts (which indeed they cannot). They can just try.
El7mdulillah, that brother Farid exists who takes out time to research & study and then expose these deceivers. May Allah reward you!