If you follow the time of the process that happened since the last news about Tehran's nuclear power, then it is most likely that Iran has reached a stage close to or has created such a weapon.
@@dianhyouvideoshut up. The term antisemitic is meaningless now. That term used to mean people abusing Jews for no reason. But based on current events, the definition of anti-semitism should be this - ‘Jews do evil things and get mad at people for noticing them’
Both have been around, but under different the control of different people and governments over time. Iran at one time was under the control of the Mongols. Does that mean teh islands belong to present day Mongolia? LOL Initially occupied basically means they formally took control by landing troops. In teh past, I seriously doubt anyone was actually using the islands, certainly not for anthing like farming. LOL
It's also dangerous for Pakistan now. Sandwiched between enemies like India, Taliban and Iran with nuclear power and a growing army, Pakistan's future looks bleak.
The charlatan behind this channel, Shirvan, is a pan-turk from Baku who has a bone to pick with Iran. He spews absolute nonsense. Iran International is owned by Saudi Arabia
9:43 that's disrespectfully wrong. It's not just a "claim" because Iran historically had these islands. They were under Britains siege in 1901 and Iran took back control of them after negotiating with Britain. It is ridiculous that UAE was established one month AFTER Britain made a deal with Iran and let Iranians took back control of their Islands and they "claim" the islands are for them.
That’s not true, those islands were always part of Iran, and Iran took those islands back from the coloniser (Britain) , UAE didn’t even exist at that time
Are you going to then claim anatolia mesopotamia and the levant since they also at one point or another belonged to an a power from persia? Get over it, persia annexed these islands, proving they weren’t in their possession beforehand.
@@Baerock broski idk why you are so pressed by Iranian sovereignty over their OWN LAND but if you talk to much we may as well do ! Those islands are Iranian inheritance they been a part of iran since Bronze age civilisation maybe you get your ass educated first then open your mouth
@@Baerock again not really since you sre not educated enough let me educate you kiddo those islands were part of Iran before UAE get their tribe independence from UK and Uk navy used to land every where on the planet and call it theirs dismissing the actual countries ruling over those lands they claimed the islands for themselves but because this was obvious that the islands are Iranian land Qajar king didn’t bother himself and later on they realised its all a brtitish plan they moved in the islands to solidify our sovereignty ,those are iranian lands no matter what you feel , arabs dont have balls to fight for them anyway and if they do they will die there
Those three islands has been part of Persian territory since ancient times, only Britishs took them in 19th century by force and Iran took it back later. I don't understand UAE claims to land that has never been theirs. Even when Iran took its islands back, state of UAE never existed.
Without those islands, Iran has full control over the Strait of Hormuz which would be disastrous for the UAE. The UAE needs open sea access there, but also in the Red Sea. They do not care about any human rights for this. So in Yemen and Sudan they're the only ones left letting their allies fighting off Iranian proxies supported by Russia and both are literally the world's worst human catastrophes. The UAE in that regard is having the same problem as Israel and Ukraine is the next one. They rely on the NATO countries for their survival, but NATO (at least when it comes to deterrence) is doing their bare minimum to help them out, forcing them to be insanely brutal to just survive. I personally am not a great fan of this approach. There must be other ways that don't cost literally millions of people their lives in the most hellish ways possible.
@@NederlandsTransatlanticus exactly, because they need other people's lands for their right or wrong reasons, they start claiming it. Just like saying to your neighbour, "I like your garden and need it for a swimming pool, so I go to other neighbours and council and claim it was mine!" , I just don't understand UAE's claims, something doesn't become yours, just because you need it!
By your logic you can just claim tajikistan and uzbekistan and turkey and iraq and syria as part of iran, since they were at least in part; a part of the persian empires. You’re brainwashed to say that, which is why even the iranian farmer will say your exact words. Arabs liver there, and also in arabistan and the entire arabian gulf coast except for the part where balochis live, many arabs lived there including my grandparents, it was never yours, you just ethnically cleansed the place, which is why there is no difference between iran and israel, both need islamic conquests.
@@Baerock firstly, the difference between Tajikestan, Usbakestan and ... with those three Persian islands is that Tajikestan and ... are now independent countries while those three Persian islands has been and are part of Persian territory. Secondly no one, no Persians or Arabs actually lives in those islands, there are only Iranian military bases there. Thirdly, by your logic New york's chinatown is part of China, because Chinese people live there! I think you have been brainwashed like Israelis into claiming lands that has never been yours, by lies and misconceptions. Also UAE is one of the few muslim countries that has a full diplomatic relationship with Israel regardless of what they do to Palestinians, because UAE and Israel are just the same! Edit: Iran is a country that Baluchs, Turks, Arabs, Persians, Kurds and ... live in it and we are proud of being the oldest multi-cultural society in the world.
Iran is really impressive despite sanctions they have a space, nuclear, missles and drone programme including armed proxies. Russia is probably sharing key technology with them as well. Its just a matter of time before Iran becomes a major power.
Russia's century-old tech in failing in Ukraine. They literally rely on North Korea to supply them with ammunition. And mediocre youtube trolls for their soft power projection, apparently. If Iran is relying on them for assistance: good fucking luck.
I think you are right. Israel and the US are on pretty shaky ground now. A serious retaliation from Iran could result in another 2 million Israelis leaving Israel, which would destroy it. American hegemony in West Asia is rapidly unraveling.
This report is pretty biased reporting in places. With US/Israel having decimate West Asia militarily, you are taking about Iran being a belligerent force in the Area? That would be WAY behind the US.
They sure could, at least they could easily obtain one from either Pakistan or Russia. Thing is, once they declared they successfully build or obtain nukes, their rivals (Saudi in particular) will also seek to get one for themselves. So what's the problem? Well, having nuke is ofc great for Iran's self-defense, but if that means Saudi also obtain nukes, it means Iran will have to invest large amount of money and resources to protect itself from potential Saudi nuclear attack across the gulf (and vice versa). This kind of arms race will benefit Saudi more than Iran (because Saudi is wealthier and have access to better tech).
@@ihl0700677525As a rule, the existing members of the nuclear club like it to be exclusive. Including keeping their allies nuclear-free. I think the DPRK nuclear program says something about how much the DPRK wants to rely on a Chinese nuclear umbrella. DPRK views them as a deterrent to outside regime change, and as an additional saber-rattling during other negotiations.
@@bastiaan7777777it has nothing to do with religion. Both are Shia countries but Azerbaijanis are not so religious. Israel and Azerbeidzjan are allies and Iran is allied with Armenia. That’s why.
There was a hole digged that was 10 km deep. It took about 25 years of constant drilling and a cost of billions of dollars. Noone is gonna drill that deep for a simple nuke test.
@dcross6360 if you are old enough to remember the lead up to iraq war, this feels similar. Fake intel about wmds from israel then and I can guarantee this is fake intel from israel now. They then build narratives to get the public to support war and preemptive invasion.
@@TheMalayLinguistthe doublespeak of warmongering propaganda. Iran is so dangerous that they have nukes so we have to invade. Also then: Iran is so weak they can't even maintain their helicopters
Lol😂 Iran was 2 months away from developing a nuke in 2020,2021,2022..... You really think they haven't done it living under threat of Murkia and its puppies
Iran hasn’t made nukes because they know they will be diciplined and but in their place. The highest they can do is arm militias in other countries because they have no real economic or political power.
I Guess "neutrality" today means you have to be on the fence about a theocratic, totalitarian regime that oppresses women, gays, minorities and others, that arms, trains and finances global terror groups, that vows to destroy another UN member country, that stives to spread their oppressive Islamic revolution worldwide, calls death to US and on and on and on. Only an Islamist or an idiot would call that "neutrality".
The quality has declined for CR . I understand your audience were thoae in west and you want to appeal to them but selling them fantasy and delusion ain't it.
Ukraine too, because nobody is taking their bid for NATO membership seriously. Well done Biden in protecting the non proliferation regime, a cornerstone of US foreign policy for decades now. 👍
@@JunaidKhan-pq8ji if nuclear Iran meant nuclear KSA (along Israel and NATO Turkey), then as a paradox a new equilibrium might be better estabilished. India developed nuclear weapons, Pakistan followed suit to set the powers equal again, and their cold war continues.
A lot of analysts have believed that the Jewish colony has been bluffing for years pretending they have one . Not necessarily people who value honesty lol.
If masterworks is such a great investment opportunity then why don’t you invest all your money into it? You’ve been doing MW ads for the past 4-5 years, at this point you’d be a millionair. At least you’re not promoting chinese knives as japanese hand made blades anymore
@@kylewhitt587 but it kinda isn't tho. They have proper documentation, breaking no law, are very transparent in their process of buying art, have a secondary market to sell/buy shares... i mean... it literally cannot be a borderline scam. Otherwise it would've been exposed within those 4 years
Our society does not promote coverage of certain topics that would make peasants question the decisions of their leadership, nor is doing business a democracy or charity. Our Western incentive system was NOT designed to promote people who trying to improve society but those creating jobs, competitive edge, and wealth for a nation. So, any kind of decent journalism or education questioning our rotten system is discouraged by financial punishments, and thus, good deeds need to be balanced by shady offers to sustain the effort, so just don't buy anything promoted on TH-cam and you will be fine. The few decent YT channels you can watch at the expense of some scam ads are still among the best educational value you get these days without risking getting some kind of computer virus, unless you can spare a separate computer on piracy subsidized education...
@@IonorRea Caspian Report is anything but trustworthy, making up imaginary scenarios and shit even locals never knew about and stating it as "planned" or other bullshit. I subscribed 5 years ago, production quantity was ramped up to the skies meanwhile quality sank like a stone in water. I still come back from time to time to check on the parallel universe and use it as a complimentary source to create my beliefs of recent events but I'd never call it journalism, maybe daydreaming. If you want real journalism, Good Times Bad Times is my favourite, those guys are not making shit up to pump out videos every week to get as many sponsors as possible. I don't have any specific beef against CR but it's got as much credit as those shills posting videos about "China's done collapse imminent" or "USD is gone prepare for war" and speaking about nothing for 20 minutes, at least CR looks somewhat pleasing to the eyes.
ANd who put it in N Korea and now Iran? China nad Russia. Witch country became nuclear because of the USA ? Israel. Now Ukraine because USA failed to defend Ukraine.
This is NOT ABOUT you put she put he put....this is about Nepotism ....this is about AUTOCRATS ....this about religions that sweep the floor with LGTB's , women and disabled basic human rights...this is about the ULTIMATE PRICE you pay to have a NUTTER in power FREEDOM!!!!
10:37 there are negligible zorastrians in the world and most are concentrated in india they do not make majority or even a sizeable population in any region of iran.
By the way, those three islands have belonged to Iran since 500 BC. Only in the 18th century, the UK did take them from Iran. The Shah of Iran eventually exchanged Bahrain with those three islands.
*"Internationally recognized borders"* is just code for *"ARTIFICIAL borders set up by the British Empire in the 19th and 20th centuries with the purpose of ensuring that there will be perpetual disputes and civil wars in the area."*
Israel claims Palestine based on a fantasy book, now Iran cannot claim an island after history? 😂 Western BS by an Azeri youtuber what a day to be alive
It's astounding how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you can't acknowledge the historical evidence of the Jewish claim to the land, while hypocritically trying to claim that Iran has a claim to the land of other countries.
@@SonnyRick The oil at least isn't as important anymore since US is self-sufficient and sanctions block much of Iran's oil. It's clear that US/Israel doesn't want Iran to have nukes. While US did destructive things, it also did positive things and innovation. However, when it comes to Iran, I've heard they are responsible for the theocrat takeover and people had better lives before.
@@usr123yt Well I don't support Iran's government so I don't care as long as you show respect towards other cultures , I don't really mind to be honest , no big deal
Because unlike Iran, Israel doesn't constantly threaten with the annihilation of other countries. The only thing Iran should be worried about defending itself against, is the people of Iran who want to get rid of the regime that is dragging them into wars with all its neighbours.
Because iran has already showed that it wants to expand even before nukes, meanwhile israel hasn’t used them even in political agreements. Nuclear armed iran will force turkey saudi arabia egypt and the uae to get nukes aswell.
No radioactivity was detected and the location of seismic activity was too low for a nuke. It's highly unlikely it was a detonation, and more so as a regular earthquake, frequent in the region.
You wouldn't measure radioactivity if it was underground, unless you took your measurement devices underground as well, which I doubt anyone would have done. As for the depth... those seismic estimates have fairly large error bars, especially when they're being measured from a long distance away. A 10km reading is entirely consistent with a true epicenter all the way up to the surface.
@@altrag Iran would have been bragging about it. The IMS uses four complementary verification methods, using the latest available technology: Fifty primary and 120 auxiliary seismic stations to monitor for an underground test by measuring shockwaves through the ground. Eleven hydroacoustic stations to detect soundwaves through the ocean from an underwater explosion. Sixty infrasound stations to listen for ultra-low-frequency sound waves moving through the atmosphere at levels inaudible to the human ear. Eighty radionuclide stations to detect radioactive particles or gases from atmospheric explosions, or vented by underground or underwater nuclear explosions. I'm pretty sure they know more about it than you do.
I love Geography and History man, at the end of the day everytime superpowers clash you end up looking at commerce-supply lines throught Europe and Asia, it's the same chokepoints through history, gotta love the human.
“Take advantage of five before five: your youth before your old age, your health before your sickness, your wealth before your poverty, your free time before your busyness, and your life before your death.” Prophet Muhammad ﷺ (Peace be upon him).
@@MrIansmitchell Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe' *"Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God."*
@@MrIansmitchell Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe' "Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God."
@@MrIansmitchell Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe' Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God.
I am happy the country of my parents(Pakistan) helped you(Iran As well) get the technology and you now have NC weapons. Otherwise they would have been invaded by USA like Iraq, and God knows how many millions would have died, so Alhamdolillah.
@@smallcube-zn2mm The West who leaves Iran alone unless Iran keeps starting proxy wars and fund terrorism across the middle east? Yeah no, Iran wants nukes for expanding their terroristic reach and dominance in the ME.
You are leaving one important thing out for some reason. The Middle East has been a place of wars and destruction and millions of deaths since the Ottoman Empire disintegrated and the British, the French and later on the USA started getting involved militarily. An umbrella of nukes provided by Iran could also bring real independence from neo colonial powers who, till now, only came to the region to kill and plunder.
A better effort than many of the agitprop-saturated videos if late but still riddled with bias. Such a shame because in the early days this channel was a breath of fresh air.
The art investing ad reminds me of the insanity of 2008. I'm starting to see ads for "I lost my job/don't have any money but still want to buy a house" mortgage ads too.
I know nukes are powerful and stuff, but people forget how powerful conventional weapons are. The air-raid of Tokyo was deadlier than the nuclear bomb over Nagasaki. And if you detonate a nuke close to your borders (I am talking about hundreds of kms), then it affects you as much, especially if the sea is involved. As the Tschernobyl nuclear melt down did in Anatolia and that was "just" a nuclear meltdown. What I am trying to say: You can always use conventional weapons. Not so much nukes. Let's say a conflict starts in southern Aserbaijan between Turkey and Iran, would Iran really use nukes and poison its own territory? Not to mention that nukes are a huge money burner due to their maintanance. People overvalue nukes. Not that they should be undervalued, but it is not as much of a game changer as people believe it to be.
Nukes enable the use of non-nuclear weapons, as well as diplomatic options. You can see this in Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the dynamics between Taiwan and China. It creates a line really far down acceptable geopolitical behavior because of its possibility for escalation.
@@capnbarky2682 You can do that even without nukes. If Russia had no nukes, they would have still invaded Ukraine. The nuke topic is in no relation to the topic at hand. Other nations are also invading or supporting other nations all without nukes. E.g. Turkey in Syria, even going against Russian soldiers, despite the fact that Russia has nukes. The only thing nukes do well, are the prevention of an all-out war, Vietnam style, which can 99,9999% of the time be solved diplomatically in this day and age. I highly doubt that even a war like the Iran-Iraq war could have ended in the usage of nukes, since it would just damage all sides.
@@justsefa1843 well I would say that all out wars actually died out because of nukes in general, since even if a country doesn't have them, one of their patron states probably does. It's easy to see how nuclear powers are able to bully non nuclear ones, Israel and Russia are able to personally push the ticket way more than even a very large modern army like Iran's because they're backed up by being at the bargaining table for Armageddon.
@@MacrossFaltenmeyer The ayatollahs are a result of US and UK f+ckery against a democratically elected government in Iran. You tell me who is acting rational and who isnt. Considering how hostile the US acted against the iranian people, which includes the Iran-Iraq war, which was green-light by the US, I think they are by far more rational with nuke plans than US foreign policy.
This guy is saying that if Iran becomes nuclear power it will be difficult for West and America to interfere in middle east so world please help West and America they have interfere in middle east because that's there right by birth
Israel won’t stop expansion so militant groups won’t stop fighting them and when you’re in a conflict with a nuclear power, you’re only goal is to develop nuclear weapons yourself perfectly rational for Iran.
"Iran already has an idealogical mindset that legitimizes it's interference with the affairs of other". 10:45 I can't write a more ironic statement if I tried...
Because Israel is a civilized responsible state that desires peace, and the regime that rules Iran is the world's largest supporter of ter..rism and is guided by a geno..dal ideology. "Let this land Iran burn as long as Islam emerges triumphant!" - Ruhollah Khomeini
Širvân jân, Iran doesn’t claim the islands were a part of its territory 6 centuries BC Iran, as the oldest country in the world which also included Baku region, has been in charge of those islands for 27 centuries, if not longer Building a nation state based on language has no guarantees of prosperity Instead of hating Iran, see if there are ways to be stronger together As for the Islamic Horror government, they will fade away as their ideology is against sanity and civility When that happens I look forwards to seeing you agree with what’s going on and stop hating where you come from
Iran is a fake country invented in the begininning of 20th century.. Todays Iran and Azerbaijan were part of turkic Qajar dynasty. Qajars were Azerbaijani Turks. Iran must be part of Azerbaijan by logic.
اکثر مردم ایران برای حمله اسرائیل به حکومت اشغالگر ایران لحظه شماری میکنند / جمهوری اسلامی جکومت اشغالگر است و مردم ایران از آن متنفر هستند ، زیرا منابع ملی را هدر داد و منافع ملی ایرانیان را قربانی منافع شخص ، حزبی و مذهبی خودش کرد /.
Iran's trip to Syria with their military is not diplomatic. We know your views are skewed from an Azerbaijani point of view but honestly everyone knows that was a military meetup in Syria . That's why surprise surprise the Israeli attack in Syria on that Iranian diplomatic mission turned out that they were Iranian military officers. Unless you are either blind or trying to deceive the audience here, you are not being an honest reporter of events.
I see your Azerbaijani agenda between the lines, and that is no surprise. Some fact checks: 1- The issue with the Zangezur corridor is that it passes the Iran-Armenia border (even if the alternative route inside the Iranian territory is not pursued) on which Iran and Armenia have sovereignty. This means their approval is a must, and their interests should be served. 2- There are also political science theories, supported by known figures in this field including John Mearsheimer, stating that a nuclear-blanced rivalry leads to stability AND less conventional confrontation as the necessity to co-exist gets imposed on both sides. To sum up, no single theory may be universally applicable at all times.
@@maquacr7014 , is that English? What in the world does that mean? Did you mean, "Silence, Westoid!" I.e. ordering me to be silent? It did you mean, "Silence the Westoid!" I.e. telling me to silence some kind of Westoid (John Mearsheimer, perhaps.) You need punctuation, otherwise your post is incomprehensible. BTW, Mearsheimer was born in New York City, USA. I was born in Kiev, USSR. So which of us is the Westoid? You figure it out.
Iran is no threat to India nor Azerbaijan. India is already using north-south corridors of Iran, and Chabahar port, to connect with Russia. Also Iran will be in China's Belt and Road plan anyways, due to Iran's strategic location. The purpose of the Zangezur corridor is to "disconnect" Iran and Armenia which has a lot of un-wanted consequences for Iran, it basically blocks one of the main routes from Iran to Europe, and it will give a leverage to Turkey and Azerbaijan to put pressure on Iran. Similarly the Arab_MED corridor was another route suggested by Israel and Arabs to bypass Iran. It wasn't particularly for India's interest, the main purpose was harming Iran's interests. Finally, neither Arabs or Turkey will get seek for nukes. KSA is literally US's puppet and it's not an independent state. US will not give them the permission to construct such arsenal. In addition, non of Arab states have the industrial or scientific capabilities for such things. Turkey, is a member of NATO, and US already installed nukes in Turkey. But again she'll not be allowed to build her own nukes independently exactly because of NATO membership...
Given that we developed functional atomic weapons with the available mid 1940s technology, I find it difficult to believe Iran doesn’t already have them. Pakistan and North Korea did it years ago. Making the bombs isn’t all that hard, it’s obtaining the fissile material that’s problematic. Or is it? Plutonium is pretty easy to make with breeder reactors- or they could obtain it from other countries. Delivery systems and having enough weapons is another matter. Also, they know that using them will bring massive retaliation that could end them. Unfortunately there are a large number of adherents to Shia prophecy about the return of the 12th imam and believe they welcome a conflagration to bring it about
Part of it is how much incentive and will a state has. A lot of states, even ones with no weapons ambitions, are x years from a weapon. If they should start one. The EU was trying to negotiate for a halted program, but the USA pulled out.
Pakistan had help from American scientists (not sure of the state itself) and later China (who previously had help from the Soviets) N. Korea had help from Pakistan. Other than France, USSR and India all states had foreign help. Even the US had help from scientists fleeing Europe.
@@SusCalvin that is generally true but the USSR had ideological reasons to help China. China wanted to screw over India by helping Pakistan. And idk Pakistan why it helped N. Korea. Maybe just money since Pakistan has corrupt leadership.
@@duckpotat9818 India had help from USSR plus stole tech from peaceful nuclear program in Europe. Pakistan had no help from USA. It also stole tech from Europe and later got help from China.
10 kilometres???? That’s deep!!! The deepest hole is about 12 kilometres and very narrow at 23cm. To slide a nuclear device (at least 50 cm in diameter) through a hole down to 10km deep is impressive.
This page is so funny and biased … you’re clearly just serving Turkish interests. Iran has occupied the 3 islands? Bro we had these islands 2500 years ago before Arabs were a thing.
You said their facilities are too deeply buried now, but just the other day the U.S. demonstrated it's capabilities to strike at underground facilities, no matter how deep, with the use of their B-2 bombers.
Skip the waitlist and invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks - masterworks.art/caspian
how did you send that 12 hours ago
@@SupWanteduploaded and kept it in private visibility, only changed it to public now.
you are being paid to promote a scam. unsubbing.
I wish you would not promote a scam.
If you follow the time of the process that happened since the last news about Tehran's nuclear power, then it is most likely that Iran has reached a stage close to or has created such a weapon.
"Iran will bring nuclear weapons to the middle east"
That a weird way to frame it since, you know, nukes are already in the middle east
anti symmetry
@@Dino-g3z aunty semite 🤔
@@dianhyouvideoshut up. The term antisemitic is meaningless now. That term used to mean people abusing Jews for no reason.
But based on current events, the definition of anti-semitism should be this - ‘Jews do evil things and get mad at people for noticing them’
Shush, that's anti Semitic to say that Israel has nukes
Is this a fact or an assumption @user-op8fg3ny3j
Iran developed nuclear weapons .. I’d like to thank our sponsor; Brilliant
yeah this channel is now helping to scam us. I've unsubbed.
@@BigTimeRushFan2112how is sponsoring Masterworks a scam?
@@karroxgaming research buddy
Thanx
You mean Brilliant sponsored Iran's nuclear weapons?
The islands were occupied? Don't think thats correct when Iran has been there for centuries and the UAE is around 50 years old. Come on Caspain
Iran is actualy the first country in the world.
I have an arm chair in my living room which is older than UAE.
@@jimkidney8913 BS
B sht always can be found in youtub videos😊😊
Both have been around, but under different the control of different people and governments over time. Iran at one time was under the control of the Mongols. Does that mean teh islands belong to present day Mongolia? LOL
Initially occupied basically means they formally took control by landing troops. In teh past, I seriously doubt anyone was actually using the islands, certainly not for anthing like farming. LOL
8:18 how dare they station their country so close to American military bases😂
It's also dangerous for Pakistan now. Sandwiched between enemies like India, Taliban and Iran with nuclear power and a growing army, Pakistan's future looks bleak.
Those are gone in the first 120 seconds of direct confrontation, so the carriers...
Iran sees it as a containment belt cuz, like, they are sooo paranoid about the noble World Police...
This channel is ludicrously biased.
Well said. They need to move their country.
lol underrated comment. China should build a military base around LA
"numerous Iranian state media outlets"
*Proceeds to show Iran International*
Hahahaha
Which is literally funded by NATO and Israeli apartheid regime
Lmaooooooo
The charlatan behind this channel, Shirvan, is a pan-turk from Baku who has a bone to pick with Iran. He spews absolute nonsense.
Iran International is owned by Saudi Arabia
Because all the rest are one.. IRCG
9:43 that's disrespectfully wrong. It's not just a "claim" because Iran historically had these islands. They were under Britains siege in 1901 and Iran took back control of them after negotiating with Britain. It is ridiculous that UAE was established one month AFTER Britain made a deal with Iran and let Iranians took back control of their Islands and they "claim" the islands are for them.
This channel host, Shervin, is a spiteful and subhuman-intelligent shill.
Even if their claim was only from the 6th century the precedent has been set with Israel. Israel’s claim is solely about ancient history.
@@JMosUndefeated Israel has no precedent. Ancient Israel is in no way related to the State of Israel
Cry more 😂
That’s not true, those islands were always part of Iran, and Iran took those islands back from the coloniser (Britain) , UAE didn’t even exist at that time
Im sorry Caspian but those 3 islands have been part of country much longer than UAE existed Idk what are you trying to implement here
The agenda he is responsible for from above forces him to do this.
Are you going to then claim anatolia mesopotamia and the levant since they also at one point or another belonged to an a power from persia? Get over it, persia annexed these islands, proving they weren’t in their possession beforehand.
@@Baerock broski idk why you are so pressed by Iranian sovereignty over their OWN LAND but if you talk to much we may as well do ! Those islands are Iranian inheritance they been a part of iran since Bronze age civilisation maybe you get your ass educated first then open your mouth
@@Baerock again not really since you sre not educated enough let me educate you kiddo those islands were part of Iran before UAE get their tribe independence from UK and Uk navy used to land every where on the planet and call it theirs dismissing the actual countries ruling over those lands they claimed the islands for themselves but because this was obvious that the islands are Iranian land Qajar king didn’t bother himself and later on they realised its all a brtitish plan they moved in the islands to solidify our sovereignty ,those are iranian lands no matter what you feel , arabs dont have balls to fight for them anyway and if they do they will die there
@@Baerockall of UAE belong to Iran.
Those three islands has been part of Persian territory since ancient times, only Britishs took them in 19th century by force and Iran took it back later. I don't understand UAE claims to land that has never been theirs. Even when Iran took its islands back, state of UAE never existed.
Without those islands, Iran has full control over the Strait of Hormuz which would be disastrous for the UAE.
The UAE needs open sea access there, but also in the Red Sea. They do not care about any human rights for this. So in Yemen and Sudan they're the only ones left letting their allies fighting off Iranian proxies supported by Russia and both are literally the world's worst human catastrophes.
The UAE in that regard is having the same problem as Israel and Ukraine is the next one. They rely on the NATO countries for their survival, but NATO (at least when it comes to deterrence) is doing their bare minimum to help them out, forcing them to be insanely brutal to just survive.
I personally am not a great fan of this approach. There must be other ways that don't cost literally millions of people their lives in the most hellish ways possible.
@@NederlandsTransatlanticus exactly, because they need other people's lands for their right or wrong reasons, they start claiming it. Just like saying to your neighbour, "I like your garden and need it for a swimming pool, so I go to other neighbours and council and claim it was mine!" , I just don't understand UAE's claims, something doesn't become yours, just because you need it!
By your logic you can just claim tajikistan and uzbekistan and turkey and iraq and syria as part of iran, since they were at least in part; a part of the persian empires.
You’re brainwashed to say that, which is why even the iranian farmer will say your exact words. Arabs liver there, and also in arabistan and the entire arabian gulf coast except for the part where balochis live, many arabs lived there including my grandparents, it was never yours, you just ethnically cleansed the place, which is why there is no difference between iran and israel, both need islamic conquests.
@@Baerock firstly, the difference between Tajikestan, Usbakestan and ... with those three Persian islands is that Tajikestan and ... are now independent countries while those three Persian islands has been and are part of Persian territory. Secondly no one, no Persians or Arabs actually lives in those islands, there are only Iranian military bases there. Thirdly, by your logic New york's chinatown is part of China, because Chinese people live there! I think you have been brainwashed like Israelis into claiming lands that has never been yours, by lies and misconceptions. Also UAE is one of the few muslim countries that has a full diplomatic relationship with Israel regardless of what they do to Palestinians, because UAE and Israel are just the same!
Edit: Iran is a country that Baluchs, Turks, Arabs, Persians, Kurds and ... live in it and we are proud of being the oldest multi-cultural society in the world.
One word - the power of conquest. No one has to agree, but its real.
Iran is really impressive despite sanctions they have a space, nuclear, missles and drone programme including armed proxies. Russia is probably sharing key technology with them as well. Its just a matter of time before Iran becomes a major power.
России до Ирана еще далеко.
Russia's century-old tech in failing in Ukraine. They literally rely on North Korea to supply them with ammunition. And mediocre youtube trolls for their soft power projection, apparently. If Iran is relying on them for assistance: good fucking luck.
Good Joke.
I think you are right. Israel and the US are on pretty shaky ground now. A serious retaliation from Iran could result in another 2 million Israelis leaving Israel, which would destroy it. American hegemony in West Asia is rapidly unraveling.
This report is pretty biased reporting in places. With US/Israel having decimate West Asia militarily, you are taking about Iran being a belligerent force in the Area?
That would be WAY behind the US.
Well people, in the end, buy stocks from the Military industrial complex
And short oil we Traders are surely evil people making profits from war.
So, by the theory of who benefits, the conflict must have been a machination of the military industrial complex in the first place.
Been in that...RTX going crazy.
How to ROI when nukes drop
Buy stocks in the thing that will make money useless. Smart.
I think it is just matter of time when Iran gets it's own nuclear weapon. If North Korea can develop it then Iran surely can also.
They sure could, at least they could easily obtain one from either Pakistan or Russia.
Thing is, once they declared they successfully build or obtain nukes, their rivals (Saudi in particular) will also seek to get one for themselves.
So what's the problem?
Well, having nuke is ofc great for Iran's self-defense, but if that means Saudi also obtain nukes, it means Iran will have to invest large amount of money and resources to protect itself from potential Saudi nuclear attack across the gulf (and vice versa). This kind of arms race will benefit Saudi more than Iran (because Saudi is wealthier and have access to better tech).
@@ihl0700677525As a rule, the existing members of the nuclear club like it to be exclusive. Including keeping their allies nuclear-free.
I think the DPRK nuclear program says something about how much the DPRK wants to rely on a Chinese nuclear umbrella.
DPRK views them as a deterrent to outside regime change, and as an additional saber-rattling during other negotiations.
You can thank obama. He helped
@@ihl0700677525 they are both muslim countries tho, I don't get why they hate eachother
lol obtain one, you win the most retrograde remark for the day.
His Azerbaijani influence really shows in this video
religion
@@bastiaan7777777it has nothing to do with religion. Both are Shia countries but Azerbaijanis are not so religious. Israel and Azerbeidzjan are allies and Iran is allied with Armenia. That’s why.
@@lazgkhn Hahaha.. so.. SA and Iran are friends :P
@@bastiaan7777777what does SA have to do with this?
@@lazgkhn Exactly this. Why else would Iran need nukes?
Such a confusing intro. It went from seismic recordings from a potential nuclear test in Iran to art collecting Americans in 10 seconds.
That's the Caspian report in a nutshell
Did not make sense to me too
10 km underground? Seems unbelievable. Almost like someone is creating a narrative for war...
There was a hole digged that was 10 km deep. It took about 25 years of constant drilling and a cost of billions of dollars. Noone is gonna drill that deep for a simple nuke test.
iran can't even make helicopters to save their former president earlier this year
@dcross6360 if you are old enough to remember the lead up to iraq war, this feels similar. Fake intel about wmds from israel then and I can guarantee this is fake intel from israel now. They then build narratives to get the public to support war and preemptive invasion.
@@TheMalayLinguist Poland can't build a plane that saves some of their government in 2010 so what's your point?
@@TheMalayLinguistthe doublespeak of warmongering propaganda.
Iran is so dangerous that they have nukes so we have to invade.
Also then: Iran is so weak they can't even maintain their helicopters
Lol😂
Iran was 2 months away from developing a nuke in 2020,2021,2022.....
You really think they haven't done it living under threat of Murkia and its puppies
You forget 2000, 2001 , 2002 , 2003 , 2004 , 2005 .....
Paki detected, opinion discarded.
It started in the early 90s with Naziyahoo making the claim to congress in 92 I believe, look it up
Iran hasn’t made nukes because they know they will be diciplined and but in their place. The highest they can do is arm militias in other countries because they have no real economic or political power.
Is this video just a vessel for the Masterworks ad?
Worst investment scam after nfts
Most video essays are. They all use the same clips...
This channel has really gone downhill
@@Storm-zr5qwi like it :) 😊
Dude has to get paid the video is plenty informative and you can fast forward through the ad once u realize what it id and that ur uninterested
i thought Caspian report was neutral, but i was wrong
I Guess "neutrality" today means you have to be on the fence about a theocratic, totalitarian regime that oppresses women, gays, minorities and others, that arms, trains and finances global terror groups, that vows to destroy another UN member country, that stives to spread their oppressive Islamic revolution worldwide, calls death to US and on and on and on.
Only an Islamist or an idiot would call that "neutrality".
No he is a Pan-Turk
He is neutral except for when it is about the enemies of Azerbaijan
He's CIA puppet
@@Threezi04lol
The quality has declined for CR . I understand your audience were thoae in west and you want to appeal to them but selling them fantasy and delusion ain't it.
I have to agree here
What is fantasy and delusion about the video?
This title reads like a patch note.
v2.0.23 - Ukraine anti-aircraft buff
v2.0.24 - Iran gains access to locked section of nuclear tech tree
v.2.0.25 - Iran removed from player map in new global update.
@@SeaJay_Oceans
Changiz Khan and Alexander couldn't remove Iran from the Map
In the censored EU and US version* @@SeaJay_Oceans
@@ElamiteMan
They were not God's Chosen Ones, the Holy Warriors of Zion.
@@SeaJay_Oceans do you imply they didn't have enough religious barbarism in them to commit a genocide on scale but those Holy Warriors do?
This guy is obsessed with Iran. And most of his videos have a geopolitical agenda.
"we can have no pants (to wear) but we must have atomic (bombs)" - Mao Zedong
If not China would have been threatened with invasion by now and can do nothing about it.
A nuclear-armed Iran will mean a nuclear-armed Saudi Arabia.
Nah Saudi Arabia is too busy with Esport events.
And Türkiye,and then Egypt
Ukraine too, because nobody is taking their bid for NATO membership seriously. Well done Biden in protecting the non proliferation regime, a cornerstone of US foreign policy for decades now. 👍
Awesome
@@JunaidKhan-pq8ji if nuclear Iran meant nuclear KSA (along Israel and NATO Turkey), then as a paradox a new equilibrium might be better estabilished. India developed nuclear weapons, Pakistan followed suit to set the powers equal again, and their cold war continues.
It would be based if Iran managed to bluff having a nuke by pretending an earthquake was a test explosion
A lot of analysts have believed that the Jewish colony has been bluffing for years pretending they have one .
Not necessarily people who value honesty lol.
How would that be “‘based’ in truth/fact”? Or are you using “based” as a synonym for cool? If so that’s fuckin lame.
Gets absolutely devestated in another coalition war lol
@@pja6476 Iran is not Iraq
N.korea did it already
Those apocalypse enthusiasts will finally be happy.
If masterworks is such a great investment opportunity then why don’t you invest all your money into it? You’ve been doing MW ads for the past 4-5 years, at this point you’d be a millionair. At least you’re not promoting chinese knives as japanese hand made blades anymore
Oh c'mon bro, be nice. He has to shill his sponsors to fund his videos. These videos cost money to make. 🤷♂️
@@iron74tube Yes, but picking a borderline scam is not cool.
@@kylewhitt587 but it kinda isn't tho.
They have proper documentation, breaking no law, are very transparent in their process of buying art, have a secondary market to sell/buy shares... i mean... it literally cannot be a borderline scam. Otherwise it would've been exposed within those 4 years
Our society does not promote coverage of certain topics that would make peasants question the decisions of their leadership, nor is doing business a democracy or charity.
Our Western incentive system was NOT designed to promote people who trying to improve society but those creating jobs, competitive edge, and wealth for a nation. So, any kind of decent journalism or education questioning our rotten system is discouraged by financial punishments, and thus, good deeds need to be balanced by shady offers to sustain the effort, so just don't buy anything promoted on TH-cam and you will be fine.
The few decent YT channels you can watch at the expense of some scam ads are still among the best educational value you get these days without risking getting some kind of computer virus, unless you can spare a separate computer on piracy subsidized education...
@@IonorRea Caspian Report is anything but trustworthy, making up imaginary scenarios and shit even locals never knew about and stating it as "planned" or other bullshit. I subscribed 5 years ago, production quantity was ramped up to the skies meanwhile quality sank like a stone in water. I still come back from time to time to check on the parallel universe and use it as a complimentary source to create my beliefs of recent events but I'd never call it journalism, maybe daydreaming. If you want real journalism, Good Times Bad Times is my favourite, those guys are not making shit up to pump out videos every week to get as many sponsors as possible.
I don't have any specific beef against CR but it's got as much credit as those shills posting videos about "China's done collapse imminent" or "USD is gone prepare for war" and speaking about nothing for 20 minutes, at least CR looks somewhat pleasing to the eyes.
10km earthquake depth is the placeholder depth they put in to post them; then they go back and update them usually
Iran didn't occupy Abu Musa. It was already ours.
Yes and so is Bahrain
he is from azerbaijan he has to show his pan-turkist ideology
this guy is very suspicious I have seen many of his videos randoly over the years and lately he is very pro-israeli. he miss sooooo many points
Just like the entirety of the West Bank and Golan is Israel's, right?
Its not ABU musa. The real name is bu musa! ABU musa is name arabs call it.
I love the constant framing of the USSR putting weapons in Cuba as if the USA didn't put them in Turkey first
ANd who put it in N Korea and now Iran? China nad Russia. Witch country became nuclear because of the USA ? Israel. Now Ukraine because USA failed to defend Ukraine.
The only reason way Usa put NUCLEAR WEAPONS in TURKIYE wes to stop the TURKS from making there own NUCLEAR WEAPONS LoL go learn history
yeah Shirvan is a joke at this point
This is NOT ABOUT you put she put he put....this is about Nepotism ....this is about AUTOCRATS ....this about religions that sweep the floor with LGTB's , women and disabled basic human rights...this is about the ULTIMATE PRICE you pay to have a NUTTER in power FREEDOM!!!!
Propaganda is a national hobby.
10:37 there are negligible zorastrians in the world and most are concentrated in india they do not make majority or even a sizeable population in any region of iran.
Yes that map is insane
All Iranians have a massive zoroastrian influence in our culture but few are actually zoroastrian in faith, what is that map 😂
Thanks for the continuous update! I am super excited about how my stock investment is going so far, making over $41k weekly is an amazing gain.
Do you invest with a professional broker? I would appreciate it if you could show me how to go about it.
Thanks to Mrs. Bruce Christelle time in my life, which had a profound impact on me.
@@DorinaMyftiu-s9pWow! Kind of in shock you mentioned expert, Bruce Christelle What a coincidence!!
Bruce Christelle has really set the standard for others to follow, we love her here in the UK as she has been really helpful and changed lots of lives
Life is easier when the cash keeps popping in, thanks to Bruce Christelle services. Glad she's getting the recognition she deserves
This guy tries to sound fair but deep inside he is very biased towards Israel because he is Azeri
What is Azeri?
@@Sib1204 Meaning he is from Azerbaijan
Azeri have beef with Armenia. Also it suffered from bolsJEWism.
Then tell me what you wanted to hear?
as an Iranian Azeri 🇮🇷 Azerbaijan+uae+ israel belong to Iran 🇮🇷
I am a Sunni Muslim and I stands with Iran 🇮🇷
Great and easy to understand information, thank you 🙏
“No nuclear weapons. Special military projectiles.” Iran
People should search how Israel got enriched Uranium for their first nuke
Israel secret nukes
Since US wars were described as bringing democracy and freedom, and Israeli wars are self defense, it's a fair game.
@@ammarlakis In six day war Israel attacked first and it was planned years ahead
@@Feefa99 indeed. They all mock Russia's "special operation" but they use the same propaganda tactics.
By the way, those three islands have belonged to Iran since 500 BC. Only in the 18th century, the UK did take them from Iran. The Shah of Iran eventually exchanged Bahrain with those three islands.
Just like a large part of Jordan has belonged to Israel since 1047 BCE along with parts of Lebanon, Syria and all of the West Bank.
@@JohnTheStun اره اما اسراییل مردم انجارا قتل عام میکند زیرا او فقط زمین را میخواهد
I really appreciate these analyses of emerging central Asian trades routes; they're very informative.
*"Internationally recognized borders"*
is just code for
*"ARTIFICIAL borders set up by the British Empire in the 19th and 20th centuries with the purpose of ensuring that there will be perpetual disputes and civil wars in the area."*
Your comment is just a code for "west bad"
@@MotiMota15
Your tribalism mentality is showing....
@@MotiMota15 i like the short truth
Israel claims Palestine based on a fantasy book, now Iran cannot claim an island after history? 😂 Western BS by an Azeri youtuber what a day to be alive
It's astounding how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you can't acknowledge the historical evidence of the Jewish claim to the land, while hypocritically trying to claim that Iran has a claim to the land of other countries.
Maybe Iran can finally stop Israel's evil and bring peace to the middle east.
A country that's essentially a mountain fortress with the capability to dispense nuclear warheads? What could possibly go wrong...
@@SonnyRick The oil at least isn't as important anymore since US is self-sufficient and sanctions block much of Iran's oil.
It's clear that US/Israel doesn't want Iran to have nukes. While US did destructive things, it also did positive things and innovation. However, when it comes to Iran, I've heard they are responsible for the theocrat takeover and people had better lives before.
@@SonnyRick how did i talk shit about iran?
I'm just saying Americans like to talk shit about other nations
@@usr123yt Well I don't support Iran's government so I don't care as long as you show respect towards other cultures , I don't really mind to be honest , no big deal
Iran has every right to defend itself. Israel has nukes so why not Iran?
Because unlike Iran, Israel doesn't constantly threaten with the annihilation of other countries. The only thing Iran should be worried about defending itself against, is the people of Iran who want to get rid of the regime that is dragging them into wars with all its neighbours.
Because iran has already showed that it wants to expand even before nukes, meanwhile israel hasn’t used them even in political agreements. Nuclear armed iran will force turkey saudi arabia egypt and the uae to get nukes aswell.
Hedging against global financial problems with art would be pretty dumb…
as ends at 3:38
No radioactivity was detected and the location of seismic activity was too low for a nuke.
It's highly unlikely it was a detonation, and more so as a regular earthquake, frequent in the region.
You wouldn't measure radioactivity if it was underground, unless you took your measurement devices underground as well, which I doubt anyone would have done.
As for the depth... those seismic estimates have fairly large error bars, especially when they're being measured from a long distance away. A 10km reading is entirely consistent with a true epicenter all the way up to the surface.
@@altrag Iran would have been bragging about it.
The IMS uses four complementary verification methods, using the latest available technology:
Fifty primary and 120 auxiliary seismic stations to monitor for an underground test by measuring shockwaves through the ground.
Eleven hydroacoustic stations to detect soundwaves through the ocean from an underwater explosion.
Sixty infrasound stations to listen for ultra-low-frequency sound waves moving through the atmosphere at levels inaudible to the human ear.
Eighty radionuclide stations to detect radioactive particles or gases from atmospheric explosions, or vented by underground or underwater nuclear explosions.
I'm pretty sure they know more about it than you do.
"No radioactivity was detected"
no shit. it was underground..
@@kleroterion1196 Israel didn't parade theirs around so why would Iran. Also Israel hasn't retaliated yet and it's been awhile.
@@Drunkendrakon What are you talking about?
Read my other comments in this thread.
If you're trying to argue if Iran has a nuke, then no, they don't.
A nuclear test at 10 km depth? Stop insulting our intelligence!
This is how they do it now 😂 u can't do nuke tests on ground level anymore. Its been band...how u think pakistan did them? Read em up
@@ashkay780 NOT at *10* km depth.
I love Geography and History man, at the end of the day everytime superpowers clash you end up looking at commerce-supply lines throught Europe and Asia, it's the same chokepoints through history, gotta love the human.
“Take advantage of five before five: your youth before your old age, your health before your sickness, your wealth before your poverty, your free time before your busyness, and your life before your death.” Prophet Muhammad ﷺ (Peace be upon him).
Which one of those consummating his“marriage” to a preteen?
@@MrIansmitchell Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe'
*"Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God."*
@@MrIansmitchell Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe'
"Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God."
@@MrIansmitchell Joseph was 90 when he married 12 year old Mary, the mother of your God.
@@MrIansmitchell Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe'
Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God.
Sounds like Iran is a reasonable country looking after its interests
LMAO
I am happy the country of my parents(Pakistan) helped you(Iran As well) get the technology and you now have NC weapons. Otherwise they would have been invaded by USA like Iraq, and God knows how many millions would have died, so Alhamdolillah.
Hasn't Iran been "a year from the nuke" since the 90s. I have always considered that to be a very long year.
It's Iranian policy to hold their uranium enrichment capacity always a year or several months from the nuke and develop it when it's needed.
this vedio is more about fear mongering of irans nuclear ambitions
Shervan is from Azerbaijan. They are anti-Iranian.
@@kenw.4539 because.... diff offshoot of believes...?
@@bastiaan7777777 Azerbaijan are close allies of Israel
Thank you very much, very interesting! Love your channel, keep up the great work!!
Israel: "we have a superior conventional army"
Also Israel: "we need the US to help us!"
Those two statements should really be the other way round... Then you might get why statement 1 is true.
@@thomasdixon5037the US most definitely doesn’t need a bunch of scrawny Israeli jews who have been bullied throughout history’s.
Israel DOES have a superior army, but that won't stop suicidal Islamists from starting a nuclear war in which everybody loses.
Iran needs nuclears to defend itself. Iran also has the right to defend itself!!!
defend against sa?
@@bastiaan7777777 defend against the West
Defend its shitty radical regime?
@@smallcube-zn2mm The West who leaves Iran alone unless Iran keeps starting proxy wars and fund terrorism across the middle east? Yeah no, Iran wants nukes for expanding their terroristic reach and dominance in the ME.
It seems your analysis is very useful and, even handed. Well done 👏
Thank you, I always had a problem with sleeping too well.
Come on, old people are scared of nukes. You should be afraid of the crazies with bio labs.
TLDR : Iran and it's "proxies" are bad, while US and it's "allies" are good
Reading and listening comprehension: 0 /10
and remember, all of that is in iran's neighborhood
Another exceptional video!! Good work, SIRVAN
Iran has the right to defend itself.
Err, sponsoring terr0r1sm?
That's not what they're doing.
10:56 so Iran will act like US
No, they don't even want n... it's against their beliefs. Their hand is being forced, so that Is... has pretext it needs to drag us in.
Don't threaten us with a good time, Shirvan
You are leaving one important thing out for some reason. The Middle East has been a place of wars and destruction and millions of deaths since the Ottoman Empire disintegrated and the British, the French and later on the USA started getting involved militarily. An umbrella of nukes provided by Iran could also bring real independence from neo colonial powers who, till now, only came to the region to kill and plunder.
The Ottomans conquered it with wars, and were preceded by wars. Nukes just bring even more destruction.
Iran : helped by russia
Isrral : helped by USA
Isrral nuclear project was helped by the french, and the nuclear submarines by germans.
A better effort than many of the agitprop-saturated videos if late but still riddled with bias.
Such a shame because in the early days this channel was a breath of fresh air.
Israël/USA will not allow it period.
Mistake at 0:30 iran int. Isnt a state run channel please mention that in top comment
Iran int is pro Israel right?
BS in this video is on another level.
I am leaving your channel because of the ads
The art investing ad reminds me of the insanity of 2008. I'm starting to see ads for "I lost my job/don't have any money but still want to buy a house" mortgage ads too.
Iran would be stupid not to have built nukes.
I know nukes are powerful and stuff, but people forget how powerful conventional weapons are. The air-raid of Tokyo was deadlier than the nuclear bomb over Nagasaki.
And if you detonate a nuke close to your borders (I am talking about hundreds of kms), then it affects you as much, especially if the sea is involved. As the Tschernobyl nuclear melt down did in Anatolia and that was "just" a nuclear meltdown.
What I am trying to say: You can always use conventional weapons. Not so much nukes. Let's say a conflict starts in southern Aserbaijan between Turkey and Iran, would Iran really use nukes and poison its own territory? Not to mention that nukes are a huge money burner due to their maintanance. People overvalue nukes. Not that they should be undervalued, but it is not as much of a game changer as people believe it to be.
Nukes enable the use of non-nuclear weapons, as well as diplomatic options. You can see this in Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the dynamics between Taiwan and China. It creates a line really far down acceptable geopolitical behavior because of its possibility for escalation.
@@capnbarky2682 You can do that even without nukes. If Russia had no nukes, they would have still invaded Ukraine. The nuke topic is in no relation to the topic at hand. Other nations are also invading or supporting other nations all without nukes. E.g. Turkey in Syria, even going against Russian soldiers, despite the fact that Russia has nukes.
The only thing nukes do well, are the prevention of an all-out war, Vietnam style, which can 99,9999% of the time be solved diplomatically in this day and age. I highly doubt that even a war like the Iran-Iraq war could have ended in the usage of nukes, since it would just damage all sides.
@@justsefa1843 well I would say that all out wars actually died out because of nukes in general, since even if a country doesn't have them, one of their patron states probably does. It's easy to see how nuclear powers are able to bully non nuclear ones, Israel and Russia are able to personally push the ticket way more than even a very large modern army like Iran's because they're backed up by being at the bargaining table for Armageddon.
You think rationally. You think that Ayatollahs who talk about Allah every five seconds are so rational?
@@MacrossFaltenmeyer The ayatollahs are a result of US and UK f+ckery against a democratically elected government in Iran. You tell me who is acting rational and who isnt.
Considering how hostile the US acted against the iranian people, which includes the Iran-Iraq war, which was green-light by the US, I think they are by far more rational with nuke plans than US foreign policy.
With what is happening in the middle east, one could argue why Iran wouldn't get a nuclear weapon? The incentives are all there...
This guy is saying that if Iran becomes nuclear power it will be difficult for West and America to interfere in middle east so world please help West and America they have interfere in middle east because that's there right by birth
Israel won’t stop expansion so militant groups won’t stop fighting them and when you’re in a conflict with a nuclear power, you’re only goal is to develop nuclear weapons yourself perfectly rational for Iran.
Great point honestly
Expanding where? Did you just invent this or do you have actual evidence that Israel is “expanding”?
I love those classic one liners at the end.
"Iran already has an idealogical mindset that legitimizes it's interference with the affairs of other". 10:45
I can't write a more ironic statement if I tried...
Perhaps something like "Iran is not a terrorist sponsoring theocracy"?
If Israel have nukes then why shouldn't Iran?
Because israel is Iran's Abba and children are not allowed to have nukes
Israel dont belife in 72 vargins in reward for boom boom 🤡
Because Israel is a civilized responsible state that desires peace, and the regime that rules Iran is the world's largest supporter of ter..rism and is guided by a geno..dal ideology.
"Let this land Iran burn as long as Islam emerges triumphant!"
- Ruhollah Khomeini
Because Iran wants to destroy Israel, and Israel does not want to destroy Iran.
Because unlike Iran, Israel doesn't constantly threaten with the annihilation of other countries.
Great, Concise Research!
Imagine the person threatening you with a knife complaining that have one.
Širvân jân, Iran doesn’t claim the islands were a part of its territory 6 centuries BC
Iran, as the oldest country in the world which also included Baku region, has been in charge of those islands for 27 centuries, if not longer
Building a nation state based on language has no guarantees of prosperity
Instead of hating Iran, see if there are ways to be stronger together
As for the Islamic Horror government, they will fade away as their ideology is against sanity and civility
When that happens I look forwards to seeing you agree with what’s going on and stop hating where you come from
"Iran, as the oldest country in the world "
lol. how do you make up this shit?
Iran is a fake country invented in the begininning of 20th century..
Todays Iran and Azerbaijan were part of turkic Qajar dynasty. Qajars were Azerbaijani Turks. Iran must be part of Azerbaijan by logic.
@@PappaTom-ub3htgoogle things above your education, love
How hard is that 😂😂
As for coming up with shit, we have your face to thank I guess lol
@@rusbea.2279 Insert angry Egyptian looks here....
@@bastiaan7777777 yet Egypt is behind by 800 years
That’s wayyyyy too long for attitude or grey area 😎
something nobody thinks about is more than 70% of the people are against the regime but the 30% have all the guns while the 70% has 0
84% & 16%
what is nonsense numbers when it comes to our country no matter who is in charge we defend it !
Bruh you really think it's hard to get guns in the middle east?
اکثر مردم ایران برای حمله اسرائیل به حکومت اشغالگر ایران لحظه شماری میکنند / جمهوری اسلامی جکومت اشغالگر است و مردم ایران از آن متنفر هستند ، زیرا منابع ملی را هدر داد و منافع ملی ایرانیان را قربانی منافع شخص ، حزبی و مذهبی خودش کرد /.
Those 70% percent would fight for Iran all the same when war comes.
Iran's trip to Syria with their military is not diplomatic. We know your views are skewed from an Azerbaijani point of view but honestly everyone knows that was a military meetup in Syria . That's why surprise surprise the Israeli attack in Syria on that Iranian diplomatic mission turned out that they were Iranian military officers. Unless you are either blind or trying to deceive the audience here, you are not being an honest reporter of events.
Always good content 🙏
Ashamed to say it took me too long to unsubscribe from this channel
Same here
I agree
Still worth a watch to see what the kosher propaganda is
I see your Azerbaijani agenda between the lines, and that is no surprise. Some fact checks:
1- The issue with the Zangezur corridor is that it passes the Iran-Armenia border (even if the alternative route inside the Iranian territory is not pursued) on which Iran and Armenia have sovereignty. This means their approval is a must, and their interests should be served.
2- There are also political science theories, supported by known figures in this field including John Mearsheimer, stating that a nuclear-blanced rivalry leads to stability AND less conventional confrontation as the necessity to co-exist gets imposed on both sides.
To sum up, no single theory may be universally applicable at all times.
John Mearsheimer is a sad joke. Stephen Walt is also a sad joke.
@@Kurtlane John Mearsheimer doesn't believe Israel is a civilized, responsible country. So his statements carry mire weight than your delululu.
@@Kurtlane Silence, westoid.
@@maquacr7014 , is that English? What in the world does that mean?
Did you mean, "Silence, Westoid!" I.e. ordering me to be silent? It did you mean, "Silence the Westoid!" I.e. telling me to silence some kind of Westoid (John Mearsheimer, perhaps.) You need punctuation, otherwise your post is incomprehensible.
BTW, Mearsheimer was born in New York City, USA. I was born in Kiev, USSR. So which of us is the Westoid? You figure it out.
@@Kurtlane Read my comment again, dingus.
Thank you for your thoughts and analysis
"but these were our islands 2600 years ago ;__: "
LMAO
I laughed when he said “international recognized borders”….
Laugh at yourself for not knowing history, you clown
They use this term everywhere except in israel.
So basically you gave 17 minutesof reasons why Iran should build nukes
No.......
Anri-Iranian propaganda folks 💯
It's so obvious
Whats propoganda here? Iranian mullahs are the enemy of humanity.. even, own population of Iran hate those fake religious businessmen..
Absolutely, funded by the CIA, extremis jyyywww & christins.. Long Live the Islamic Republic of Iran. 🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷
Proud to be a Muslim and an Iranian.
he is azeri he has to say this stuff fake azeri btw im the real azeri LUL
and never forget the role of Iran in the Iran-Contra affair, we CAN NOT skip THAT
Unsubscribe from this biased channel. I always knew you are pro-z1o oriented.
Interesting 🤔 times ahead 🤞
Every one has PROXIES
Iran is no threat to India nor Azerbaijan. India is already using north-south corridors of Iran, and Chabahar port, to connect with Russia. Also Iran will be in China's Belt and Road plan anyways, due to Iran's strategic location.
The purpose of the Zangezur corridor is to "disconnect" Iran and Armenia which has a lot of un-wanted consequences for Iran, it basically blocks one of the main routes from Iran to Europe, and it will give a leverage to Turkey and Azerbaijan to put pressure on Iran. Similarly the Arab_MED corridor was another route suggested by Israel and Arabs to bypass Iran. It wasn't particularly for India's interest, the main purpose was harming Iran's interests.
Finally, neither Arabs or Turkey will get seek for nukes. KSA is literally US's puppet and it's not an independent state. US will not give them the permission to construct such arsenal. In addition, non of Arab states have the industrial or scientific capabilities for such things.
Turkey, is a member of NATO, and US already installed nukes in Turkey. But again she'll not be allowed to build her own nukes independently exactly because of NATO membership...
Given that we developed functional atomic weapons with the available mid 1940s technology, I find it difficult to believe Iran doesn’t already have them. Pakistan and North Korea did it years ago. Making the bombs isn’t all that hard, it’s obtaining the fissile material that’s problematic. Or is it? Plutonium is pretty easy to make with breeder reactors- or they could obtain it from other countries.
Delivery systems and having enough weapons is another matter.
Also, they know that using them will bring massive retaliation that could end them. Unfortunately there are a large number of adherents to Shia prophecy about the return of the 12th imam and believe they welcome a conflagration to bring it about
Part of it is how much incentive and will a state has. A lot of states, even ones with no weapons ambitions, are x years from a weapon. If they should start one.
The EU was trying to negotiate for a halted program, but the USA pulled out.
Pakistan had help from American scientists (not sure of the state itself) and later China (who previously had help from the Soviets)
N. Korea had help from Pakistan.
Other than France, USSR and India all states had foreign help. Even the US had help from scientists fleeing Europe.
@@duckpotat9818 My impression was that the existing members of the nuclear club generally prefer to keep it exclusive.
@@SusCalvin that is generally true but the USSR had ideological reasons to help China.
China wanted to screw over India by helping Pakistan.
And idk Pakistan why it helped N. Korea. Maybe just money since Pakistan has corrupt leadership.
@@duckpotat9818 India had help from USSR plus stole tech from peaceful nuclear program in Europe.
Pakistan had no help from USA. It also stole tech from Europe and later got help from China.
10 kilometres???? That’s deep!!! The deepest hole is about 12 kilometres and very narrow at 23cm. To slide a nuclear device (at least 50 cm in diameter) through a hole down to 10km deep is impressive.
its nonsense, see top comments.
This page is so funny and biased … you’re clearly just serving Turkish interests. Iran has occupied the 3 islands? Bro we had these islands 2500 years ago before Arabs were a thing.
Thank the democrats for letting this happen.
You said their facilities are too deeply buried now, but just the other day the U.S. demonstrated it's capabilities to strike at underground facilities, no matter how deep, with the use of their B-2 bombers.