5:21 - "I shouldn't even have to write it out, but I am writing it out, because I care about you, and I want you to be happy." Thank you. New subscriber.
Why the euatuons to find the components of the tensor is different for different axes. I mean why do you say that xx component is calculated like this and all. It may seem silly but iam not getting the point.
That's a great question - without an easy answer. Basically, you are taking individual points and finding the angular momentum (r x p). When you factor and gather terms, you get stuff that looks like the elements in the inertia tensor and they just happen to have a negative sign. The key is to realize where that tensor comes from - r x p for a bunch of particles.
5:21 - "I shouldn't even have to write it out, but I am writing it out, because I care about you, and I want you to be happy." Thank you. New subscriber.
Loved it. I always like adding details like the color, thank you.
I like your videos.
Thank you
It was best explanation
Why the euatuons to find the components of the tensor is different for different axes. I mean why do you say that xx component is calculated like this and all. It may seem silly but iam not getting the point.
thanks!
A quick doubt. Why xy and yx components get a negative sign. Sorry if the question is too obvious for the answer.
That's a great question - without an easy answer. Basically, you are taking individual points and finding the angular momentum (r x p). When you factor and gather terms, you get stuff that looks like the elements in the inertia tensor and they just happen to have a negative sign.
The key is to realize where that tensor comes from - r x p for a bunch of particles.
First, do you always draw capital sigma by drawing a 2 and then adding a flag? Second, nice Monte Carlo approach (sounds familiar :)
am I drawing sigma wrong? If so, I blame my parents.