Looking at those opposing magnetic fields, It makes perfect sense to me now As to why certain anti-gravity systems that rely on magnetic fields utilize forcing 2 or more opposing magnets together to create magnetic fields that expand beyond the magnets, creating a "disk" of flux surrounding the forced together magnets.
@@smitinghammer5309 - LMFAO Who cares what he says. He is challenging your basic understanding of what you think & thought you knew to be TRUE. I can't stop laughing cuz YES he does speak like such. Why not just correct him instead? The Ferrocell does indeed work far better than this demonstration.
@@adolforosado There is a video exposing his theft of photos. Some people also say he clearly doesn't have any advice to give about photography. I dunno, that's not why i watch him...
@@MathSciTutor - Ken still doesn't explain what exactly a Magnetic Field is. He label's such as.... *"Ether Perturbation"* That doesn't explain what a Field is. That describes what a Field does. That's not the definition of what a Field is but rather what you think it does. If someone could define what a Magnetic Field is beyond dodging the question. That would be great.
If only a magnet could be positioned in a central region of a liquid suspension containing ferro magnetic particles that are locally bound but able to rotate (quasi crystalline is it? Or something of the sort anyway.) If a means of visualising the suspensions alignment somehow, we might get a decent representation of the field as a whole. Undoubtedly it would identify discrepancies that would be indicative of unknown, unknowns but from this point, the properties and characteristics of the suspension could be amended and an even clearer representation could be achieved. Of the fields interaction anyhow, my head hurts when trying to grasp the feasibility of interacting/detecting something without altering it to, too much of a degree that it could be considered authentic. Even if it is not altered, it would be dampened...
Hi. Many thanks for this video. Have you done one with a magnet submerged in that liquid with the iron powder already mixed in? I know it is sacrificing a magnet but should produce a true 3D image of the field around a magnet...or would it just draw all the powder onto itself?
From what I can tell - magnetism without anything in the field is a uniform field. The presence of anything ferrous within the field changes the field by its presence. That gets represented as lines of flux because the ferrous particles align themselves within the field and repel all their neighbors creating the flux line representation. I hope this was not too confusing:)
I don't think magnetism brings the lines to the game. The only reason that you see it is because of the iron filings, and they are probably creating the lines from their reaction to the magnetic field. You don't feel ratcheting between two magnets, because there are no lines.
. Magnetic fluxes have a three-dimensional structure and cannot be transmitted in a flat form. In addition, if you use iron filings, then you get the result of their interaction with magnetic fluxes and not the form of the fluxes themselves. . I made a sensor/indicator that allows to get at least an idea of how the magnet works. Good luck! . Магнитные потоки имеют объёмную структуру и в плоском виде их не передать. К тому же, если вы используете железные опилки, то вы получаете результат их взаимодействия с магнитными потоками а не вид самих потоков. . Я сделал датчик/индикатор позволяющий хоть приблизительно получить представление о том как работает магнит. Удачи!
Nope, he didn't use too much words. He gave every piece of information you need in a clear and proper way so people can do this themselves. No waste of words or time there.
@@Abihef Ok, what a dick I was there.. I was thinking he used too much not needed obvios explanation.. thanks for you make me get so very clear and . How is it the word?.. I don remember but, well ok, thank because you teach me the right way of look and watch or to see, I mean. Ok no. But. Thanks anyway. 🤪
Well, if you know everything about silicone casting, particle physics, magnets and how to combine those. But most people who're gonna try this would totally mess this up with any less explanation. Only remark I'd have would be him saying let's get started twice in a row. There was this other video about coil and magnets to which it did semi apply though.
Looking at those opposing magnetic fields, It makes perfect sense to me now As to why certain anti-gravity systems that rely on magnetic fields utilize forcing 2 or more opposing magnets together to create magnetic fields that expand beyond the magnets, creating a "disk" of flux surrounding the forced together magnets.
havent you seen my buddies invention the ferrocell yet?
@@smitinghammer5309 - LMFAO
Who cares what he says. He is challenging your basic understanding of what you think & thought you knew to be TRUE. I can't stop laughing cuz YES he does speak like such. Why not just correct him instead?
The Ferrocell does indeed work far better than this demonstration.
@@smitinghammer5309 Your brain is missing troll.
@@smitinghammer5309 My DIY ferrocells work 1000X better than this video.
@@adolforosado There is a video exposing his theft of photos. Some people also say he clearly doesn't have any advice to give about photography. I dunno, that's not why i watch him...
@@timewas673 would you give a link?
Good video! Imagine a big table with a "dinamic" ferrita dust swimming in a gel .... inside in a bigger table.....
Very nice demonstration
This needs to be done in like a liter or 5 liter scale. An aquarium with some big magnets, singularly or in pairs.
Have you done a video showing the magnetic fields as one magnet passses over another , from entering to leaving, both in attraction and repelling?
George, contact me , im Tommy martins friend, i wrote that book on magnetism, you need to get a FERROCELL to REALLY see what magnetism is
Is this the Tom Martin in KY?
yes, ive spent 5 years trying to call you, but nobody ever answers..... havent you seen my buddies invention the FERROCELL yet????????
@@MathSciTutor - Ken still doesn't explain what exactly a Magnetic Field is. He label's such as.... *"Ether Perturbation"*
That doesn't explain what a Field is. That describes what a Field does. That's not the definition of what a Field is but rather what you think it does.
If someone could define what a Magnetic Field is beyond dodging the question. That would be great.
- What are Magnetic Field Lines
- Why do they even exist
Very Simple Questions
@@metalgear- I have ..drawn it...proved it :)
If only a magnet could be positioned in a central region of a liquid suspension containing ferro magnetic particles that are locally bound but able to rotate (quasi crystalline is it? Or something of the sort anyway.)
If a means of visualising the suspensions alignment somehow, we might get a decent representation of the field as a whole. Undoubtedly it would identify discrepancies that would be indicative of unknown, unknowns but from this point, the properties and characteristics of the suspension could be amended and an even clearer representation could be achieved.
Of the fields interaction anyhow, my head hurts when trying to grasp the feasibility of interacting/detecting something without altering it to, too much of a degree that it could be considered authentic.
Even if it is not altered, it would be dampened...
Hi. Many thanks for this video. Have you done one with a magnet submerged in that liquid with the iron powder already mixed in? I know it is sacrificing a magnet but should produce a true 3D image of the field around a magnet...or would it just draw all the powder onto itself?
Makes me think that hot pouring iron parts for motors around a magnet might improve efficiency?
that would erase the magnetism from the magnet.
Would using a circular container be better?
This is well cool
Why do magnets have lines of flux rather than a uniform field?
From what I can tell - magnetism without anything in the field is a uniform field. The presence of anything ferrous within the field changes the field by its presence. That gets represented as lines of flux because the ferrous particles align themselves within the field and repel all their neighbors creating the flux line representation. I hope this was not too confusing:)
neighbors please define what neighbors are ,?thanks
8:10 whats the point in waiting? Is there a timed release with the iron? hmm
I don't think magnetism brings the lines to the game. The only reason that you see it is because of the iron filings, and they are probably creating the lines from their reaction to the magnetic field. You don't feel ratcheting between two magnets, because there are no lines.
. Magnetic fluxes have a three-dimensional structure and cannot be transmitted in a flat form. In addition, if you use iron filings, then you get the result of their interaction with magnetic fluxes and not the form of the fluxes themselves.
. I made a sensor/indicator that allows to get at least an idea of how the magnet works. Good luck!
. Магнитные потоки имеют объёмную структуру и в плоском виде их не передать. К тому же, если вы используете железные опилки, то вы получаете результат их взаимодействия с магнитными потоками а не вид самих потоков.
. Я сделал датчик/индикатор позволяющий хоть приблизительно получить представление о том как работает магнит. Удачи!
Stopped at 10:10 DO IT I A VACUUM.. That will eliminate the air bubbls.....
Can silicone oil produce electric field
..How to talk a million of word to explain something easy...
Perfectly describes the other video I saw of this dude.😂
You got me curious
Nope, he didn't use too much words. He gave every piece of information you need in a clear and proper way so people can do this themselves. No waste of words or time there.
@@Abihef Ok, what a dick I was there.. I was thinking he used too much not needed obvios explanation.. thanks for you make me get so very clear and . How is it the word?.. I don remember but, well ok, thank because you teach me the right way of look and watch or to see, I mean. Ok no. But. Thanks anyway. 🤪
Well, if you know everything about silicone casting, particle physics, magnets and how to combine those.
But most people who're gonna try this would totally mess this up with any less explanation.
Only remark I'd have would be him saying let's get started twice in a row.
There was this other video about coil and magnets to which it did semi apply though.
very awesome!
Magnetism in 3D = Gravity it seems to me
How to Make Minus Magnet Oil
You look like sid meier lol
WOW first comment long time fan. Hi George!