I wish you would upload a video from the moment you put the magnet on the jar, to the moment all motion is gone, so we can watch for ourselves. Thank you very much, sir.
Never let this guy approach your computer : you never know what is in his pocket and your nice pictures and photos on your hard drive would sink into oblivion 😁 Other than that, super great and fascinating video of how vortices can be created by a magnetic field. Watched it twice. Please. We want more on this topic !
It is more fun to see the magnetism in 3D and in motion :) I have watched lots of your videos with the ferrocells - they definitely provide a different way of looking at it:)
Hmmm….this is a great video…one may be confused about the effect of a magnetic ‘field’ close to a magnet, especially when magnets, in this case iron filings, are used in observation. Obviously, the magnetic filings, change what the observer ‘sees’ in relation to the test magnetic source. You did a great job of representing this observation conundrum. By merely changing the filing size and oil viscosity, the observation changes. Thus, one may conclude the actual magnetic field configuration from the magnet is hard to really discern. For example, if space is made of extremely small charged particles, or energy with magnetic ‘moments’, then again one has a difficult time describing magnetic field geometry. Of course, the magnet itself consists of its’ own internal environment, immense in another scale, where again one encounters the same conundrum. Of course, the other aspect of magnetic ‘field’ is the electric ‘field’ which is always present as well, and inseparable, as they are different aspects of the same thing. Again, it was so refreshing to see your video, thanks!
@@jadug3305 Rather, easier to see the ‘shape’ of a ‘field’ influenced by micron size iron in oil. Certainly all of the iron becomes magnetic itself and attracts and separates thereof.
Can I ask you a question, please? Some time ago I saw a ball magnet which was hit with a hammer and there was only a little dent on its surface. Its color was dark violet to black. The surface was smooth. Its mechanical toughness was close to the one of a 2 inch steel bearing ball. Do you know the name of the allow?
Typically most people are just like you:) However, what we have seen a lot is that overt time, people come up on a situation that does require a magnet and then they remember SuperMagnetMan and come to us.
@@SuperMagnetMan glad to hear that ;) I used to love crafts and design and included a lot of magnets in my designs. Sadly unless you deliver to europe I will have to stick with local providers sorry ^^'
Maybe you can help me. I had a meditation where I was shown a model of a geothermal magnetic generator. It was a donut shaped vortex with a tight center. There were magnets on tracks being propelled by a pipe inside a geothermal vent in a pulsating manner. I was told if we build 7 of these we could power all of planet earth. I have been meditating for many years, and sometimes things come through. This was one of the most powerful ones and I'd really like for someone with knowledge to consider my theory. If Tesla could access knowledge above, I guess any of us can. So maybe this is one of those ideas.
It seems like you only did this with the South Pole facing down and I know iron is attractive to both North and South poles, but then again each side would be in opposite directions of flow one would be going in in the other going out. Therefore is there a difference with this experiment if you change the pole from south to north or does it act the same? I would assume it might act similar except be less pronounced in the repulsive effect of the outer tornado because both fields are going together and therefore the tornado would likely be larger and quicker to develop as well as maybe more forceful in its action.
Usually I don't check for south or north polarity when working with iron since it is attracted to both. It is a great experiment to explain gradients in magnetic fields.
Ok I think I am picking up what you’re laying down. It’s not actually the hourglass vortex that’s the source it’s the 2 rotating vortices that pitch the cylinder vortex that do all the work. Mother Nature loves Venturi effect. Plasma pitching. light vortex pitching using dielectric rotating torus Venturing a light hyperboloid or ⌛️ what makes it pitch are those rotating particles in the solution 🍩 ⏳ 🍩 🔃↕️🔃 ↔️ 🔄↕️🔄
Saygı değer öğretmenim 12:00 bence mıknatısı magnetizer ile yön verdiğinizde bobinin mıknatısın içini bir havlu gibi sıkıyorsunuz burgu hareketi. Bu şekilde nükleonlar veya sicimler kasırga hareketi ile kum saati gibi saçılıyor. Mıknatıs ışık hızındaki nükleonların hızını yavaşlattığını düşünüyorum. Kara delik gibi hareket ediyorlar.
translated from Google - My respected teacher, 12:00, I think when you direct the magnet with the magnetizer, you squeeze the inside of the magnet like a towel, the twisting movement. In this way, nucleons or strings are scattered like an hourglass with whirlwind motion. I think the magnet slows down the speed of nucleons at the speed of light. They act like black holes.
Very interesting idea. Now we have to think of a way to verify. These particles are large enough to allow me to study but small enough to reveal magnetism secrets. Çok ilginç bir fikir. Şimdi doğrulamanın bir yolunu düşünmeliyiz. Bu parçacıklar çalışmama izin verecek kadar büyük ama manyetizma sırlarını açığa çıkaracak kadar küçük.
I have just been learning about these magnet materials myself and trying to get up to speed. They look like they could be the future! Ben de bu mıknatıs malzemelerini yeni öğreniyordum ve hızlanmaya çalışıyorum. Gelecek olabilirler gibi görünüyorlar!
You are mixing up magnetic with fluid dynamic effects. The vortex is a result of your oil being pulled up and out with the filings. Try this again with something less viscous (water, spiritus) and you will probably see less vortex (and faster movement).
Thanks for your comment - I intentionally chose a fairly viscous fluid to see it - Of course water or alcohol quickly oxidize the particles and you only have a very short time frame to work with and have to shoot everything with slow motion cameras. If you look carefully out to the sides you absolutely see a stream of particles going down relative to the central stream. Then as they near the bottom they are pulled to the center stream and back up. It is harder to video in micro as opposed to me being able to watch this through a magnifying glass:)
The wording at @9:22 is unfortunate: 'gathers the field' is not what happens, it's just an induced magnet in the filing that interacts with the primary magnet, nothing more. An ferrite core in a coil does the same, no 'concentration' or 'bending' of the field.
Thanks for the comment - but "gathers the field" is what actually happens - as the magnetism prefers to travel through ferrous material rather than anything else it will pull more field into the particles which will align relative to the applied field. Adjacent particles that are just ahead of that particle will align themselves N-S to N-S and become a longer particle. Particles that are parallel to each other will repel side to side until one has collected a larger mass and then accelerate ahead.
@@SuperMagnetMan You cannot put a force on a field and bend it. A total field is just the sum of a lot of elementary fields, Within ferro- and ferri-magnetic materials, small elementary magnets that are normally in random directions and cancel each other, under an external magnetic field will align, forming an additional magnet. The sum of the external field and the induced field will combine and look like the external field is bent. But actually it is just an additional field. You may say it does not make a difference in the end. But it is most important to have the right explanation to do correct predictions for systems. Do the simulation, you will see it works out.
Define field. The way you word it you make it sound like more than one field. It doesn't even make sense unless there is a fundamental field outside of the magnetic field. There might be many magnetic fields but they are all the same thing from the same source just a different state? Like ice is frozen water. It's still water.
@@magneticflux7833 I'll take the definition I learned at university, in the words of the english wikipedia: "A magnetic field is a vector field that describes the magnetic influence on moving electric charges, electric currents, and magnetic materials." Where "vector field" means that the influence has a magnitude and direction. You can measure the field by some probe that you move through the field and that somehow is affected by the field, for example small magnetic particles, or a Hall probe. The key point in vector fields is that every source generates a field and you can add them by the linear superposition principle. The result of course is one effective field. If you remove all but a single source, measure it separately, and do this for every source, you can add up the separates fields to the total effective field. The special thing about ferro- and ferri-magnetic materials is, that they only generate a field when some external field is present (or was present and the material shows reminiscence - permanent magnet). This works by alignment of the otherwise randomly oriented magnetic (Weiss) domains. Then the material acts just like an additional permanent magnet. This is the magnetization, and depending on the material you can either measure it afterwards in a permanent magnet or only little magnetization in a ferrite rod (see coercitivity). The combination of the magnetizing field and the ready-created magnet is the field that you observe. It looks like the ferrous material "attracts" the field, and "amplifies" it, while in fact it is two different sources that each generate their own fields, combining in a seemingly no-trivial total fields.
Superfan here. Lol Ever attempted this with a diamagnetic particle? Paramagnetic? I am interested in effect of induced field of ferromagnetic on co suspensions of para and diamagnetic particles. I'm positing that self organizing structures may be visible, ie crystalline stabilization patterns
I have tried pyrolytic graphite - the most diamagnetic material - with magnets and the particles suspended in water. It is hard to tell anything. I will set up some with the silicone oil and see if it shows anything else. I would not expect the paramagnetic particles like copper to show anything but I can test it and see. Good suggestion.
@@SuperMagnetMan thanks, did you just order 2nm iron filings? I am going to see if I can set up a shaker table to size filings. Are you just using plain silicon brake fluid?
Can you use your most sensitive magnetometer and gauss meter on someone who has gotten bill gates jahb for covid? Dont use covid in the description just post it. People are claiming magnetic injection sites????
What would be the effect (if any) of a hexagram shaped magnet? I know the pyramid effects from the magnets I bought form you. Thank you btw. I love them.
Have you noticed that the movement of the ferrous material in the magnetic field is essentially the same way a mushroom cloud forms from a nuclear explosion?
Please recreate this experiment with bismuth, I predict a toroidal helix formation it would be so beautiful. I had tried to achieve this videos experiment a few years ago with no success. Ty for doing this experiment on video I finally have proof of my prediction thanks to u
What if I had a donut, with 2 tracksrunning around the outside and then coming close but never touching in the middle of the donut, then shooting steam up the center to keep the magnets moving in the middle? Could that be made into a magnetic generator?
@Science Revolution fields are actions.. not objects.. so technicly we are ALL actions since we are all on the same "plane' we are ALL ALEAYS in motion.. the difference is weather that motion is contained into an area through molecular bonding or by other means.
Awesome! Ken sent me here. New subscriber.
I wish you would upload a video from the moment you put the magnet on the jar, to the moment all motion is gone, so we can watch for ourselves.
Thank you very much, sir.
George, I absolutely love it! 🤩 Dielectricity and magnetism visually demonstrated. Seeing is believing 👍🏻
Never let this guy approach your computer : you never know what is in his pocket and your nice pictures and photos on your hard drive would sink into oblivion 😁
Other than that, super great and fascinating video of how vortices can be created by a magnetic field. Watched it twice. Please. We want more on this topic !
I always have some small magnets in my pocket:) Love it!!!
Came here after Ken Wheeler’s post.
time for you to buy a ferrocell honey muffin
It is more fun to see the magnetism in 3D and in motion :) I have watched lots of your videos with the ferrocells - they definitely provide a different way of looking at it:)
@@SuperMagnetManFEM anyone?
I needed this channel SO bad. Just placed an order.
Thank you, that was very interesting. Have you looked up from the base rather than the side?
Hmmm….this is a great video…one may be confused about the effect of a magnetic ‘field’ close to a magnet, especially when magnets, in this case iron filings, are used in observation. Obviously, the magnetic filings, change what the observer ‘sees’ in relation to the test magnetic source. You did a great job of representing this observation conundrum. By merely changing the filing size and oil viscosity, the observation changes. Thus, one may conclude the actual magnetic field configuration from the magnet is hard to really discern. For example, if space is made of extremely small charged particles, or energy with magnetic ‘moments’, then again one has a difficult time describing magnetic field geometry. Of course, the magnet itself consists of its’ own internal environment, immense in another scale, where again one encounters the same conundrum. Of course, the other aspect of magnetic ‘field’ is the electric ‘field’ which is always present as well, and inseparable, as they are different aspects of the same thing. Again, it was so refreshing to see your video, thanks!
The field is easier to visualise with a ferrocell. Look for Ken Wheeler's TH-cam channel theoria_apophasis
@@jadug3305 Rather, easier to see the ‘shape’ of a ‘field’ influenced by micron size iron in oil. Certainly all of the iron becomes magnetic itself and attracts and separates thereof.
Can I ask you a question, please? Some time ago I saw a ball magnet which was hit with a hammer and there was only a little dent on its surface. Its color was dark violet to black. The surface was smooth. Its mechanical toughness was close to the one of a 2 inch steel bearing ball. Do you know the name of the allow?
How many people here are watching the videos because they are clients and how many are just super curious like me?
Typically most people are just like you:) However, what we have seen a lot is that overt time, people come up on a situation that does require a magnet and then they remember SuperMagnetMan and come to us.
@@SuperMagnetMan glad to hear that ;)
I used to love crafts and design and included a lot of magnets in my designs.
Sadly unless you deliver to europe I will have to stick with local providers sorry ^^'
Maybe you can help me. I had a meditation where I was shown a model of a geothermal magnetic generator. It was a donut shaped vortex with a tight center. There were magnets on tracks being propelled by a pipe inside a geothermal vent in a pulsating manner. I was told if we build 7 of these we could power all of planet earth. I have been meditating for many years, and sometimes things come through. This was one of the most powerful ones and I'd really like for someone with knowledge to consider my theory. If Tesla could access knowledge above, I guess any of us can. So maybe this is one of those ideas.
Has anybody ever measured the angular velocity of a toroidal magnetic field? Can it be slowed or sped up?
🎉torus fields run the realm
have you tried copper or gold and any other elements upside down and right side up ??
I have a question please tell me
How to measure the magnetic force between stator and the rooter in running condition in induction motor
is this what you might call centrifugal divergence and centripetal convergence of the dielectric field?
Does a monopole have just one fluck?
It seems like you only did this with the South Pole facing down and I know iron is attractive to both North and South poles, but then again each side would be in opposite directions of flow one would be going in in the other going out. Therefore is there a difference with this experiment if you change the pole from south to north or does it act the same?
I would assume it might act similar except be less pronounced in the repulsive effect of the outer tornado because both fields are going together and therefore the tornado would likely be larger and quicker to develop as well as maybe more forceful in its action.
Usually I don't check for south or north polarity when working with iron since it is attracted to both. It is a great experiment to explain gradients in magnetic fields.
Ok I think I am picking up what you’re laying down. It’s not actually the hourglass vortex that’s the source it’s the 2 rotating vortices that pitch the cylinder vortex that do all the work. Mother Nature loves Venturi effect. Plasma pitching. light vortex pitching using dielectric rotating torus Venturing a light hyperboloid or ⌛️ what makes it pitch are those rotating particles in the solution 🍩 ⏳ 🍩 🔃↕️🔃 ↔️ 🔄↕️🔄
Who's here because of Ken's video
Saygı değer öğretmenim 12:00 bence mıknatısı magnetizer ile yön verdiğinizde bobinin mıknatısın içini bir havlu gibi sıkıyorsunuz burgu hareketi. Bu şekilde nükleonlar veya sicimler kasırga hareketi ile kum saati gibi saçılıyor. Mıknatıs ışık hızındaki nükleonların hızını yavaşlattığını düşünüyorum. Kara delik gibi hareket ediyorlar.
Öğretmenim bana demir nitrür mıknatıs yapmayı öğretirmisiniz.Bununla ilgili kaynak var mı. Saygılarımla.
translated from Google - My respected teacher, 12:00, I think when you direct the magnet with the magnetizer, you squeeze the inside of the magnet like a towel, the twisting movement. In this way, nucleons or strings are scattered like an hourglass with whirlwind motion. I think the magnet slows down the speed of nucleons at the speed of light. They act like black holes.
Very interesting idea. Now we have to think of a way to verify. These particles are large enough to allow me to study but small enough to reveal magnetism secrets.
Çok ilginç bir fikir. Şimdi doğrulamanın bir yolunu düşünmeliyiz. Bu parçacıklar çalışmama izin verecek kadar büyük ama manyetizma sırlarını açığa çıkaracak kadar küçük.
I have just been learning about these magnet materials myself and trying to get up to speed. They look like they could be the future!
Ben de bu mıknatıs malzemelerini yeni öğreniyordum ve hızlanmaya çalışıyorum. Gelecek olabilirler gibi görünüyorlar!
Present
You are mixing up magnetic with fluid dynamic effects. The vortex is a result of your oil being pulled up and out with the filings. Try this again with something less viscous (water, spiritus) and you will probably see less vortex (and faster movement).
Thanks for your comment - I intentionally chose a fairly viscous fluid to see it - Of course water or alcohol quickly oxidize the particles and you only have a very short time frame to work with and have to shoot everything with slow motion cameras. If you look carefully out to the sides you absolutely see a stream of particles going down relative to the central stream. Then as they near the bottom they are pulled to the center stream and back up. It is harder to video in micro as opposed to me being able to watch this through a magnifying glass:)
@@SuperMagnetMan try with diesel fuel or gasoline
The wording at @9:22 is unfortunate: 'gathers the field' is not what happens, it's just an induced magnet in the filing that interacts with the primary magnet, nothing more. An ferrite core in a coil does the same, no 'concentration' or 'bending' of the field.
Thanks for the comment - but "gathers the field" is what actually happens - as the magnetism prefers to travel through ferrous material rather than anything else it will pull more field into the particles which will align relative to the applied field. Adjacent particles that are just ahead of that particle will align themselves N-S to N-S and become a longer particle. Particles that are parallel to each other will repel side to side until one has collected a larger mass and then accelerate ahead.
@@SuperMagnetMan You cannot put a force on a field and bend it. A total field is just the sum of a lot of elementary fields, Within ferro- and ferri-magnetic materials, small elementary magnets that are normally in random directions and cancel each other, under an external magnetic field will align, forming an additional magnet.
The sum of the external field and the induced field will combine and look like the external field is bent. But actually it is just an additional field.
You may say it does not make a difference in the end. But it is most important to have the right explanation to do correct predictions for systems.
Do the simulation, you will see it works out.
@@patrickstrasser-mikhail6873 You can manipulate a field by changing permeability th-cam.com/video/4mXlX9XaHcg/w-d-xo.html
Define field. The way you word it you make it sound like more than one field.
It doesn't even make sense unless there is a fundamental field outside of the magnetic field.
There might be many magnetic fields but they are all the same thing from the same source just a different state? Like ice is frozen water. It's still water.
@@magneticflux7833 I'll take the definition I learned at university, in the words of the english wikipedia: "A magnetic field is a vector field that describes the magnetic influence on moving electric charges, electric currents, and magnetic materials." Where "vector field" means that the influence has a magnitude and direction. You can measure the field by some probe that you move through the field and that somehow is affected by the field, for example small magnetic particles, or a Hall probe.
The key point in vector fields is that every source generates a field and you can add them by the linear superposition principle. The result of course is one effective field. If you remove all but a single source, measure it separately, and do this for every source, you can add up the separates fields to the total effective field.
The special thing about ferro- and ferri-magnetic materials is, that they only generate a field when some external field is present (or was present and the material shows reminiscence - permanent magnet). This works by alignment of the otherwise randomly oriented magnetic (Weiss) domains. Then the material acts just like an additional permanent magnet. This is the magnetization, and depending on the material you can either measure it afterwards in a permanent magnet or only little magnetization in a ferrite rod (see coercitivity). The combination of the magnetizing field and the ready-created magnet is the field that you observe.
It looks like the ferrous material "attracts" the field, and "amplifies" it, while in fact it is two different sources that each generate their own fields, combining in a seemingly no-trivial total fields.
Superfan here. Lol Ever attempted this with a diamagnetic particle? Paramagnetic? I am interested in effect of induced field of ferromagnetic on co suspensions of para and diamagnetic particles. I'm positing that self organizing structures may be visible, ie crystalline stabilization patterns
I have tried pyrolytic graphite - the most diamagnetic material - with magnets and the particles suspended in water. It is hard to tell anything. I will set up some with the silicone oil and see if it shows anything else. I would not expect the paramagnetic particles like copper to show anything but I can test it and see. Good suggestion.
@@SuperMagnetMan thanks, did you just order 2nm iron filings? I am going to see if I can set up a shaker table to size filings. Are you just using plain silicon brake fluid?
@@SuperMagnetMan I'm thinking pyrolitic has wrong density. Bismuth? Density isnt the correct word. Pyrolitic is planar
Can you use your most sensitive magnetometer and gauss meter on someone who has gotten bill gates jahb for covid? Dont use covid in the description just post it. People are claiming magnetic injection sites????
You might want to send me an email on this with more details about your question. I am not sure I follow the question. Thanks
What would be the effect (if any) of a hexagram shaped magnet? I know the pyramid effects from the magnets I bought form you. Thank you btw. I love them.
Awesome! Ken sent me here. New subscriber
Here from Ken's channel.
VERY interesting! I have always loved magnets, i guess you could say I've always been drawn towards them!🤣🤓🧐
Have you noticed that the movement of the ferrous material in the magnetic field is essentially the same way a mushroom cloud forms from a nuclear explosion?
Pleasure to watch! Great explanation! Thank You!
Glad it was helpful!
Please recreate this experiment with bismuth, I predict a toroidal helix formation it would be so beautiful. I had tried to achieve this videos experiment a few years ago with no success. Ty for doing this experiment on video I finally have proof of my prediction thanks to u
Best video. Can u magnetize an magnet i. A spiral direction? Instead of straight up example?
What if I had a donut, with 2 tracksrunning around the outside and then coming close but never touching in the middle of the donut, then shooting steam up the center to keep the magnets moving in the middle? Could that be made into a magnetic generator?
Quantitatively speaking that is.
Does a magnet Lose its power over time . years or decades or even longer time period
Yes
The rotating magnetic field is a fundamental principle in physics and one of the greatest discoveries of all times.
@Science Revolution I’m always asking the atomism ist people what fields are made of? Or how light speeds up again after traveling through glass
@Science Revolution fields are actions.. not objects.. so technicly we are ALL actions since we are all on the same "plane' we are ALL ALEAYS in motion.. the difference is weather that motion is contained into an area through molecular bonding or by other means.
Magnetism is key to everything in the Unseen World it literally is an intelligence beyond grasp🌿👁️🌿
Black markers matter, just an fyi
You are correct!!! We will have a new one for the next video:)